Thermoradiotherapy planning: Integration in routine clinical practice

Hyperthermia for Targeting Cancer and Cancer Stem Cells: Insights from Novel Cellular and Clinical Approaches

The Cellular Heat Shock Response and in particular heat shock protein activation are vital stress reactions observed in both healthy and cancer cells. Hyperthermia (HT) has been proposed for several years as an advancing non-invasive cancer therapy. It selectively targets cancer cells through mechanisms influenced by temperature and temperature variations. This article delves into the impact of HT on cancer cells, especially cancer stem cells (CSCs), essential contributors to cancer recurrence and metastasis. HT has shown promise in eliminating CSCs, sensitizing them to conventional treatments and modulating the tumor microenvironment. The exploration extends to mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), which exhibit both pro-tumorigenic and anti-tumorigenic effects. HT's potential in recruiting therapeutic MSCs for targeted delivery of antitumoral agents is also discussed. Furthermore, the article introduces Brain Thermodynamics-guided Hyperthermia (BTGH) technology, a breakthrough in temperature control and modulation of heat transfer under different conditions. This non-invasive method leverages the brain-eyelid thermal tunnel (BTT) to monitor and regulate internal brain temperature. BTGH technology, with its precision and noninvasive continuous monitoring capabilities, is under clinical investigation for applications in neurological disorders and cancer. The innovative three-phase approach involves whole-body HT, targeted brain HT, and organ-specific HT. In conclusion, the exploration of localized or whole-body HT offers promising avenues for cancer, psychiatric and neurological diseases. The ongoing clinical investigations and potential applications underscore the significance of understanding and harnessing heat's responses to enhance human health.

Theoretical evaluation of the impact of diverse treatment conditions by calculation of the tumor control probability (TCP) of simulated cervical cancer Hyperthermia-Radiotherapy (HT-RT) treatments in-silico

INTRODUCTION

Hyperthermia (HT) induces various cellular biological processes, such as repair impairment and direct HT cell killing. In this context, in-silico biophysical models that translate deviations in the treatment conditions into clinical outcome variations may be used to study the extent of such processes and their influence on combined hyperthermia plus radiotherapy (HT + RT) treatments under varying conditions.

METHODS

An extended linear-quadratic model calibrated for SiHa and HeLa cell lines (cervical cancer) was used to theoretically study the impact of varying HT treatment conditions on radiosensitization and direct HT cell killing effect. Simulated patients were generated to compute the Tumor Control Probability (TCP) under different HT conditions (number of HT sessions, temperature and time interval), which were randomly selected within margins based on reported patient data.

RESULTS

Under the studied conditions, model-based simulations suggested a treatment improvement with a total CEM43 thermal dose of approximately 10 min. Additionally, for a given thermal dose, TCP increased with the number of HT sessions. Furthermore, in the simulations, we showed that the TCP dependence on the temperature/time interval is more correlated with the mean value than with the minimum/maximum value and that comparing the treatment outcome with the mean temperature can be an excellent strategy for studying the time interval effect.

CONCLUSION

The use of thermoradiobiological models allows us to theoretically study the impact of varying thermal conditions on HT + RT treatment outcomes. This approach can be used to optimize HT treatments, design clinical trials, and interpret patient data.

Radiosensitization by Hyperthermia Critically Depends on the Time Interval

PURPOSE

Hyperthermia is a potent sensitizer of radiation therapy that improves both tumor control and survival in women with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). The optimal sequence and interval between hyperthermia and radiation therapy are still under debate.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We investigated the interval and sequence in vitro in cervical cancer cell lines, patient-derived organoids, and SiHa cervical cancer hind leg xenografts in athymic nude mice and compared the results with retrospective results from 58 women with LACC treated with thermoradiotherapy.

RESULTS

All 3 approaches confirmed that shortening the interval between hyperthermia and radiation therapy enhanced hyperthermic radiosensitization by 2 to 8 times more DNA double-strand breaks and apoptosis and 10 to 100 times lower cell survival, delayed tumor growth in mice, and increased the 5-year survival rate of women with LACC from 22% (interval ≥80 minutes) to 54% (interval <80 minutes). In vitro and in vivo results showed that the sequence of hyperthermia and radiation therapy did not affect the outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Shortening the interval between hyperthermia and radiation therapy significantly improves treatment outcomes. The sequence of hyperthermia and radiation therapy (before or after) does not seem to matter.

A Novel Framework for Thermoradiotherapy Treatment Planning

PURPOSE

Thermoradiotherapy combines radiation therapy with hyperthermia to increase therapeutic effectiveness. Currently, both modalities are optimized separately and in state-of-the-art research the enhanced therapeutic effect is evaluated using equivalent radiation dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2). This study proposes a novel thermoradiotherapy treatment planning framework with voxelwise EQD2 radiation therapy optimizing including thermal radiosensitization and direct thermal cytotoxicity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

To demonstrate proof-of-concept of the planning framework, 3 strategies consisting of 20 radiation therapy fractions were planned for 4 prostate cancer cases with substantially different temperature distributions: (1) Conventional radiation therapy plan of 60 Gy combined with 4 hyperthermia sessions (RT60 + HT), (2) standalone uniform dose escalation to 68 Gy without hyperthermia (RT68), and (3) uniform target EQD2 that maximizes the tumor control probability (TCP) accounting for voxelwise thermal effects of 4 hyperthermia sessions without increasing normal tissue doses (RTHT + HT). Assessment included dose, EQD2, TCP, and rectal normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), alongside robustness analyses for TCP and NTCP against parameter uncertainties.

RESULTS

The estimated TCP of around 76% for RT60 without hyperthermia was increased to an average of 85.9% (range, 81.3%-90.5%) for RT60 + HT, 92.5% (92.4%-92.5%) for RT68, and 94.4% (91.7%-96.6%) for RTHT + HT. The corresponding averaged rectal NTCPs were 8.7% (7.9%-10.0%), 14.9% (13.8%-17.1%), and 8.4% (7.5%-9.7%), respectively. RT68 and RTHT + HT exhibited slightly enhanced TCP robustness against parameter uncertainties compared with RT60 + HT, and RT68 presented higher and less robust rectal NTCP values compared with the other planning strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

This study introduces an innovative thermoradiotherapy planning approach, integrating thermal effects into EQD2-based radiation therapy optimization. Results demonstrate an ability to achieve enhanced and uniform target EQD2 and TCP across various temperature distributions without elevating normal tissue EQD2 or NTCP compared with conventional methods. Although promising for improving clinical outcomes, realizable enhancements depend on accurate tumor- and tissue-specific data and precise quantification of hyperthermic effects, which are seamlessly integrable in the planning framework as they emerge.

Quantitative analysis of contribution of mild and moderate hyperthermia to thermal ablation and sensitization of irreversible electroporation of pancreatic cancer cells

INTRODUCTION

Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is an ablation modality that applies short, high-voltage electric pulses to unresectable cancers. Although considered a non-thermal technique, temperatures do increase during IRE. This temperature rise sensitizes tumor cells for electroporation as well as inducing partial direct thermal ablation.

AIM

To evaluate the extent to which mild and moderate hyperthermia enhance electroporation effects, and to establish and validate in a pilot study cell viability models (CVM) as function of both electroporation parameters and temperature in a relevant pancreatic cancer cell line.

METHODS

Several IRE-protocols were applied at different well-controlled temperature levels (37 °C ≤ T ≤ 46 °C) to evaluate temperature dependent cell viability at enhanced temperatures in comparison to cell viability at T = 37 °C. A realistic sigmoid CVM function was used based on thermal damage probability with Arrhenius Equation and cumulative equivalent minutes at 43 °C (CEM43°C) as arguments, and fitted to the experimental data using "Non-linear-least-squares"-analysis.

RESULTS

Mild (40 °C) and moderate (46 °C) hyperthermic temperatures boosted cell ablation with up to 30% and 95%, respectively, mainly around the IRE threshold E_th,50% electric-field strength that results in 50% cell viability. The CVM was successfully fitted to the experimental data.

CONCLUSION

Both mild- and moderate hyperthermia significantly boost the electroporation effect at electric-field strengths neighboring E_th,50%. Inclusion of temperature in the newly developed CVM correctly predicted both temperature-dependent cell viability and thermal ablation for pancreatic cancer cells exposed to a relevant range of electric-field strengths/pulse parameters and mild moderate hyperthermic temperatures.

The Relevance of High Temperatures and Short Time Intervals Between Radiation Therapy and Hyperthermia: Insights in Terms of Predicted Equivalent Enhanced Radiation Dose

PURPOSE

The radiosensitization effect of hyperthermia can be considered and quantified as an enhanced equivalent radiation dose (EQD_RT), that is, the dose needed to achieve the same effect without hyperthermia. EQD_RT can be predicted using an extended linear quadratic model, with temperature-dependent parameters. Clinical data show that both the achieved temperature and time interval between radiation therapy and hyperthermia correlate with clinical outcome, but their effect on expected EQD_RT is unknown and was therefore evaluated in this study.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Biological modeling was performed using our in-house developed software (X-Term), considering a 23- × 2-Gy external beam radiation scheme, as applied for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. First, the EQD_RT was calculated for homogeneous temperature levels, evaluating time intervals between 0 and 4 hours. Next, realistic heterogeneous hyperthermia treatment plans were combined with radiation therapy plans and the EQD_RT was calculated for 10 patients. Furthermore, the effect of achieving 0.5°C to 1°C lower or higher temperatures was evaluated.

RESULTS

EQD_RT increases substantially with both increasing temperature and decreasing time interval. The effect of the time interval is most pronounced at higher temperatures (>41°C). At a typical hyperthermic temperature level of 41.5°C, an enhancement of ∼10 Gy can be realized with a 0-hour time interval, which is decreased to only ∼4 Gy enhancement with a 4-hour time interval. Most enhancement is already lost after 1 hour. Evaluation in patients predicted an average additional EQD_RT (D95%) of 2.2 and 6.3 Gy for 4- and 0-hour time intervals, respectively. The effect of 0.5°C to 1°C lower or higher temperatures is most pronounced at high temperature levels and short time intervals. The additional EQD_RT (D95%) ranged between 1.5 and 3.3 Gy and between 4.5 and 8.5 Gy for 4- and 0-hour time intervals, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Biological modeling provides relevant insight into the relationship between treatment parameters and expected EQD_RT. Both high temperatures and short time intervals are essential to maximize EQD_RT.

Validation of a Temperature-Feedback Controlled Automated Magnetic Hyperthermia Therapy Device

We present in vivo validation of an automated magnetic hyperthermia therapy (MHT) device that uses real-time temperature input measured at the target to control tissue heating. MHT is a thermal therapy that uses heat generated by magnetic materials exposed to an alternating magnetic field. For temperature monitoring, we integrated a commercial fiber optic temperature probe containing four gallium arsenide (GaAs) temperature sensors. The controller device used temperature from the sensors as input to manage power to the magnetic field applicator. We developed a robust, multi-objective, proportional-integral-derivative (PID) algorithm to control the target thermal dose by modulating power delivered to the magnetic field applicator. The magnetic field applicator was a 20 cm diameter Maxwell-type induction coil powered by a 120 kW induction heating power supply operating at 160 kHz. Finite element (FE) simulations were performed to determine values of the PID gain factors prior to verification and validation trials. Ex vivo verification and validation were conducted in gel phantoms and sectioned bovine liver, respectively. In vivo validation of the controller was achieved in a canine research subject following infusion of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) into the brain. In all cases, performance matched controller design criteria, while also achieving a thermal dose measured as cumulative equivalent minutes at 43 °C (CEM43) 60 ± 5 min within 30 min.

The Effects of Heat Stress on the Transcriptome of Human Cancer Cells: A Meta-Analysis

Hyperthermia is clinically applied cancer treatment in conjunction with radio- and/or chemotherapy, in which the tumor volume is exposed to supraphysiological temperatures. Since cells can effectively counteract the effects of hyperthermia by protective measures that are commonly known as the heat stress response, the identification of cellular processes that are essential for surviving hyperthermia could lead to novel treatment strategies that improve its therapeutic effects. Here, we apply a meta-analytic approach to 18 datasets that capture hyperthermia-induced transcriptome alterations in nine different human cancer cell lines. We find, in line with previous reports, that hyperthermia affects multiple processes, including protein folding, cell cycle, mitosis, and cell death, and additionally uncover expression changes of genes involved in KRAS signaling, inflammatory responses, TNF-a signaling and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Interestingly, however, we also find a considerable inter-study variability, and an apparent absence of a 'universal' heat stress response signature, which is likely caused by the differences in experimental conditions. Our results suggest that gene expression alterations after heat stress are driven, to a large extent, by the experimental context, and call for a more extensive, controlled study that examines the effects of key experimental parameters on global gene expression patterns.

Evaluation of the Heat Shock Protein 90 Inhibitor Ganetespib as a Sensitizer to Hyperthermia-Based Cancer Treatments

Simple Summary

Hyperthermia boosts the effects of radio- and chemotherapy regimens, but its clinical potential is hindered by the ability of (cancer) cells to activate a protective mechanism known as the heat stress response. Strategies that inhibit its activation or functions have the potential, therefore, to improve the overall efficacy of hyperthermia-based treatments. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of the HSP90 inhibitor ganetespib in promoting the effects of radiotherapy or cisplatin combined with hyperthermia in vitro and in a cervix cancer mouse model.

Abstract

Hyperthermia is being used as a radio- and chemotherapy sensitizer for a growing range of tumor subtypes in the clinic. Its potential is limited, however, by the ability of cancer cells to activate a protective mechanism known as the heat stress response (HSR). The HSR is marked by the rapid overexpression of molecular chaperones, and recent advances in drug development make their inhibition an attractive option to improve the efficacy of hyperthermia-based therapies. Our previous in vitro work showed that a single, short co-treatment with a HSR (HSP90) inhibitor ganetespib prolongs and potentiates the effects of hyperthermia on DNA repair, enhances hyperthermic sensitization to radio- and chemotherapeutic agents, and reduces thermotolerance. In the current study, we first validated these results using an extended panel of cell lines and more robust methodology. Next, we examined the effects of hyperthermia and ganetespib on global proteome changes. Finally, we evaluated the potential of ganetespib to boost the efficacy of thermo-chemotherapy and thermo-radiotherapy in a xenograft murine model of cervix cancer. Our results revealed new insights into the effects of HSR inhibition on cellular responses to heat and show that ganetespib could be employed to increase the efficacy of hyperthermia when combined with radiation.

A patterns of care analysis of hyperthermia in combination with radio(chemo)therapy or chemotherapy in European clinical centers

PURPOSE

The combination of hyperthermia (HT) with radio(chemo)therapy or chemotherapy (CT) is an established treatment strategy for specific indications. Its application in routine clinical practice in Europe depends on regulatory and local conditions. We conducted a survey among European clinical centers to determine current practice of HT.

METHODS

A questionnaire with 22 questions was sent to 24 European HT centers. The questions were divided into two main categories. The first category assessed how many patients are treated with HT in combination with radio(chemo)therapy or CT for specific indications per year. The second category addressed which hyperthermia parameters are recorded. Analysis was performed using descriptive methods.

RESULTS

The response rate was 71% (17/24) and 16 centers were included in this evaluation. Annually, these 16 centers treat approximately 637 patients using HT in combination with radio(chemo)therapy or CT. On average, 34% (range: 3-100%) of patients are treated in clinical study protocols. Temperature readings and the time interval between HT and radio(chemo)therapy or CT are recorded in 13 (81%) and 9 (56%) centers, respectively. The thermal dose quality parameter "cumulative equivalent minutes at 43 °C" (CEM43°C) is only evaluated in five (31%) centers for each HT session. With regard to treatment sequence, 8 (50%) centers administer HT before radio(chemo)therapy and the other 8 in the reverse order.

CONCLUSION

There is a significant heterogeneity among European HT centers as to the indications treated and the recording of thermometric parameters. More evidence from clinical studies is necessary to achieve standardization of HT practice.

Current Challenges in Image-Guided Magnetic Hyperthermia Therapy for Liver Cancer

For patients diagnosed with advanced and unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), liver transplantation remains the best option to extend life. Challenges with organ supply often preclude liver transplantation, making palliative non-surgical options the default front-line treatments for many patients. Even with imaging guidance, success following treatment remains inconsistent and below expectations, so new approaches are needed. Imaging-guided thermal therapy interventions have emerged as attractive procedures that offer individualized tumor targeting with the potential for the selective targeting of tumor nodules without impairing liver function. Furthermore, imaging-guided thermal therapy with added standard-of-care chemotherapies targeted to the liver tumor can directly reduce the overall dose and limit toxicities commonly seen with systemic administration. Effectiveness of non-ablative thermal therapy (hyperthermia) depends on the achieved thermal dose, defined as time-at-temperature, and leads to molecular dysfunction, cellular disruption, and eventual tissue destruction with vascular collapse. Hyperthermia therapy requires controlled heat transfer to the target either by in situ generation of the energy or its on-target conversion from an external radiative source. Magnetic hyperthermia (MHT) is a nanotechnology-based thermal therapy that exploits energy dissipation (heat) from the forced magnetic hysteresis of a magnetic colloid. MHT with magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) and alternating magnetic fields (AMFs) requires the targeted deposition of MNPs into the tumor, followed by exposure of the region to an AMF. Emerging modalities such as magnetic particle imaging (MPI) offer additional prospects to develop fully integrated (theranostic) systems that are capable of providing diagnostic imaging, treatment planning, therapy execution, and post-treatment follow-up on a single platform. In this review, we focus on recent advances in image-guided MHT applications specific to liver cancer.

Clinical magnetic hyperthermia requires integrated magnetic particle imaging

Magnetic nanomaterials that respond to clinical magnetic devices have significant potential as cancer nanotheranostics. The complexities of their physics, however, introduce challenges for these applications. Hyperthermia is a heat‐based cancer therapy that improves treatment outcomes and patient survival when controlled energy delivery is combined with accurate thermometry. To date, few technologies have achieved the needed evolution for the demands of the clinic. Magnetic fluid hyperthermia (MFH) offers this potential, but to be successful it requires particle‐imaging technology that provides real‐time thermometry. Presently, the only technology having the potential to meet these requirements is magnetic particle imaging (MPI), for which a proof‐of‐principle demonstration with MFH has been achieved. Successful clinical translation and adoption of integrated MPI/MFH technology will depend on successful resolution of the technological challenges discussed.

This article is categorized under:

Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Nanomedicine for Oncologic Disease

Diagnostic Tools > In Vivo Nanodiagnostics and Imaging

A randomized phase-II study of reirradiation and hyperthermia versus reirradiation and hyperthermia plus chemotherapy for locally recurrent breast cancer in previously irradiated area

BACKGROUND

In patients with inoperable local regional recurrences of breast cancer in previously irradiated areas, local control is difficult to maintain and treatment options are limited. The Dutch standard treatment for such recurrences is reirradiation combined with hyperthermia. Apart from enhancing the effect of reirradiation, hyperthermia is also known to improve local effects of chemotherapy like cisplatin. This randomized phase-II trial compares reirradiation and hyperthermia versus the same treatment combined with cisplatin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From December 2010 up to January 2019, 49 patients were randomized, 27 in the standard arm and 22 in the combined arm. A total of 32 Gy was given in eight fractions of 4 Gy in 4 weeks, at two fractions per week. After January 2015, the radiation schedule was changed to 46 Gy in 23 fractions of 2 Gy, at five fractions per week. Hyperthermia was added once a week after radiotherapy. The combined arm was treated with four cycles of weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m².

RESULTS

Complete response rate was 60.9% in the standard arm and 61.1% in the combined arm (p = 0.87). Partial response rate was 30.4% in the standard arm and 33.3% in the combined arm (p = 0.79). One-year overall survival was 63.4% in the standard arm and 57.4% in the combined arm. One-year local progression-free interval was 81.5% in the standard arm and 88.1% in the combined arm (p = 0.95). Twenty-five percentage of patients in the standard arm experienced grade 3 or 4 acute toxicity and 29% of patients in the combined arm (p = 0.79).

CONCLUSION

No potential benefit could be detected of adding cisplatin to reirradiation and hyperthermia in patients with recurrent breast cancer in a previously irradiated area. With or without cisplatin, most patients had subsequent local control until last follow-up or death.

The role of hyperthermia in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer: a comprehensive review

Radiotherapy with cisplatin (chemoradiation) is the standard treatment for women with locally advanced cervical cancer. Radiotherapy with deep hyperthermia (thermoradiation) is a well established alternative, but is rarely offered as an alternative to chemoradiation, particularly for patients in whom cisplatin is contraindicated. The scope of this review is to provide an overview of the biological rationale of hyperthermia treatment delivery, including patient workflow, and the clinical effectiveness of hyperthermia as a radiosensitizer in the treatment of cervical cancer. Hyperthermia is especially effective in hypoxic and nutrient deprived areas of the tumor where radiotherapy is less effective. Its radiosensitizing effectiveness depends on the temperature level, duration of treatment, and the time interval between radiotherapy and hyperthermia. High quality hyperthermia treatment requires an experienced team, adequate online adaptive treatment planning, and is preferably performed using a phased array radiative locoregional hyperthermia device to achieve the optimal thermal dose effect. Hyperthermia is well tolerated and generally leads to only mild toxicity, such as patient discomfort. Patients in whom cisplatin is contraindicated should therefore be referred to a hyperthermia center for thermoradiation.

Targetability of cervical cancer by magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU)-mediated hyperthermia (HT) for patients receiving radiation therapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the targetability of late-stage cervical cancer by magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU)-induced hyperthermia (HT) as an adjuvant to radiation therapy (RT).

METHODS

Seventy-nine cervical cancer patients (stage IIIB-IVA) who received RT with lesions visible on positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) were retrospectively analyzed for targetability using a commercially-available HT-capable MRgHIFU system. Targetability was assessed for both primary targets and/or any metastatic lymph nodes using both posterior (supine) and anterior (prone) patient setups relative to the transducer. Thirty-four different angles of rotation along subjects' longitudinal axis were analyzed. Targetability was categorized as: (1) Targetable with/without minimal intervention; (2) Not targetable. To determine if any factors could be used for prospective screening of patients, potential associations between demographic/anatomical factors and targetability were analyzed.

RESULTS

72.15% primary tumors and 33.96% metastatic lymph nodes were targetable from at least one angle. 49.37% and 39.24% of primary tumors could be targeted with patient laying in supine and prone positions, respectively. 25°-30° rotation and 0° rotation had the highest rate of the posterior and anterior targetability, respectively. The ventral depth of the tumor and its distance to the coccyx were statistically correlated with the anterior and posterior targetability, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Most late-stage cervical cancer primaries were targetable by MRgHIFU HT requiring either no/minimal intervention. A rotation of 0° or 25°-30° relative to the transducer might benefit anterior and posterior targetability, respectively. Certain demographic/anatomic parameters might be useful in screening patients for treatability.

Efficient Heat Shock Response Affects Hyperthermia-Induced Radiosensitization in a Tumor Spheroid Control Probability Assay

Hyperthermia (HT) combined with irradiation is a well-known concept to improve the curative potential of radiotherapy. Technological progress has opened new avenues for thermoradiotherapy, even for recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). Preclinical evaluation of the curative radiosensitizing potential of various HT regimens remains ethically, economically, and technically challenging. One key objective of our study was to refine an advanced 3-D assay setup for HT + RT research and treatment testing. For the first time, HT-induced radiosensitization was systematically examined in two differently radioresponsive HNSCC spheroid models using the unique in vitro "curative" analytical endpoint of spheroid control probability. We further investigated the cellular stress response mechanisms underlying the HT-related radiosensitization process with the aim to unravel the impact of HT-induced proteotoxic stress on the overall radioresponse. HT disrupted the proteome's thermal stability, causing severe proteotoxic stress. It strongly enhanced radiation efficacy and affected paramount survival and stress response signaling networks. Transcriptomics, q-PCR, and western blotting data revealed that HT + RT co-treatment critically triggers the heat shock response (HSR). Pre-treatment with chemical chaperones intensified the radiosensitizing effect, thereby suppressing HT-induced Hsp27 expression. Our data suggest that HT-induced radiosensitization is adversely affected by the proteotoxic stress response. Hence, we propose the inhibition of particular heat shock proteins as a targeting strategy to improve the outcome of combinatorial HT + RT.

Advanced patient-specific hyperthermia treatment planning

Hyperthermia treatment planning (HTP) is valuable to optimize tumor heating during thermal therapy delivery. Yet, clinical hyperthermia treatment plans lack quantitative accuracy due to uncertainties in tissue properties and modeling, and report tumor absorbed power and temperature distributions which cannot be linked directly to treatment outcome. Over the last decade, considerable progress has been made to address these inaccuracies and therefore improve the reliability of hyperthermia treatment planning. Patient-specific electrical tissue conductivity derived from MR measurements has been introduced to accurately model the power deposition in the patient. Thermodynamic fluid modeling has been developed to account for the convective heat transport in fluids such as urine in the bladder. Moreover, discrete vasculature trees have been included in thermal models to account for the impact of thermally significant large blood vessels. Computationally efficient optimization strategies based on SAR and temperature distributions have been established to calculate the phase-amplitude settings that provide the best tumor thermal dose while avoiding hot spots in normal tissue. Finally, biological modeling has been developed to quantify the hyperthermic radiosensitization effect in terms of equivalent radiation dose of the combined radiotherapy and hyperthermia treatment. In this paper, we review the present status of these developments and illustrate the most relevant advanced elements within a single treatment planning example of a cervical cancer patient. The resulting advanced HTP workflow paves the way for a clinically feasible and more reliable patient-specific hyperthermia treatment planning.

Heating technology for malignant tumors: a review

The therapeutic application of heat is very effective in cancer treatment. Both hyperthermia, i.e., heating to 39-45 °C to induce sensitization to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and thermal ablation, where temperatures beyond 50 °C destroy tumor cells directly are frequently applied in the clinic. Achievement of an effective treatment requires high quality heating equipment, precise thermal dosimetry, and adequate quality assurance. Several types of devices, antennas and heating or power delivery systems have been proposed and developed in recent decades. These vary considerably in technique, heating depth, ability to focus, and in the size of the heating focus. Clinically used heating techniques involve electromagnetic and ultrasonic heating, hyperthermic perfusion and conductive heating. Depending on clinical objectives and available technology, thermal therapies can be subdivided into three broad categories: local, locoregional, or whole body heating. Clinically used local heating techniques include interstitial hyperthermia and ablation, high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), scanned focused ultrasound (SFUS), electroporation, nanoparticle heating, intraluminal heating and superficial heating. Locoregional heating techniques include phased array systems, capacitive systems and isolated perfusion. Whole body techniques focus on prevention of heat loss supplemented with energy deposition in the body, e.g., by infrared radiation. This review presents an overview of clinical hyperthermia and ablation devices used for local, locoregional, and whole body therapy. Proven and experimental clinical applications of thermal ablation and hyperthermia are listed. Methods for temperature measurement and the role of treatment planning to control treatments are discussed briefly, as well as future perspectives for heating technology for the treatment of tumors.

Modulating the Heat Stress Response to Improve Hyperthermia-Based Anticancer Treatments

Simple Summary

Hyperthermia is a method to expose a tumor to elevated temperatures. Heating of the tumor promotes the effects of various treatment regimens that are based on chemo and radiotherapy. Several aspects, however, limit the efficacy of hyperthermia-based treatments. This review provides an overview of the effects and limitations of hyperthermia and discusses how current drawbacks of the therapy can potentially be counteracted by inhibiting the heat stress response—a mechanism that cells activate to defend themselves against hyperthermia.

Abstract

Cancer treatments based on mild hyperthermia (39–43 °C, HT) are applied to a widening range of cancer types, but several factors limit their efficacy and slow down more widespread adoption. These factors include difficulties in adequate heat delivery, a short therapeutic window and the acquisition of thermotolerance by cancer cells. Here, we explore the biological effects of HT, the cellular responses to these effects and their clinically-relevant consequences. We then identify the heat stress response—the cellular defense mechanism that detects and counteracts the effects of heat—as one of the major forces limiting the efficacy of HT-based therapies and propose targeting this mechanism as a potentially universal strategy for improving their efficacy.

Mathematical model for the thermal enhancement of radiation response: thermodynamic approach

Radiotherapy can effectively kill malignant cells, but the doses required to cure cancer patients may inflict severe collateral damage to adjacent healthy tissues. Recent technological advances in the clinical application has revitalized hyperthermia treatment (HT) as an option to improve radiotherapy (RT) outcomes. Understanding the synergistic effect of simultaneous thermoradiotherapy via mathematical modelling is essential for treatment planning. We here propose a theoretical model in which the thermal enhancement ratio (TER) relates to the cell fraction being radiosensitised by the infliction of sublethal damage through HT. Further damage finally kills the cell or abrogates its proliferative capacity in a non-reversible process. We suggest the TER to be proportional to the energy invested in the sensitisation, which is modelled as a simple rate process. Assuming protein denaturation as the main driver of HT-induced sublethal damage and considering the temperature dependence of the heat capacity of cellular proteins, the sensitisation rates were found to depend exponentially on temperature; in agreement with previous empirical observations. Our findings point towards an improved definition of thermal dose in concordance with the thermodynamics of protein denaturation. Our predictions well reproduce experimental in vitro and in vivo data, explaining the thermal modulation of cellular radioresponse for simultaneous thermoradiotherapy.

Effect of gastrointestinal gas on the temperature distribution in pancreatic cancer hyperthermia treatment planning

PURPOSE

In pancreatic cancer treatment, hyperthermia can be added to increase efficacy of chemo- and/or radiotherapy. Gas in stomach, intestines and colon is often in close proximity to the target volume. We investigated the impact of variations in gastrointestinal gas (GG) on temperature distributions during simulated hyperthermia treatment (HT).

METHODS

We used sets of one CT and eight cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans obtained prior to/during fractionated image-guided radiotherapy in four pancreatic cancer patients. In Plan2Heat, we simulated locoregional heating by an ALBA-4D phased array radiofrequency system and calculated temperature distributions for (i) the segmented CT (sCT), (ii) sCT with GG replaced by muscle (sCT₀), (iii) sCT₀ with eight different GG distributions as visible on CBCT inserted (sCT_CBCT). We calculated cumulative temperature-volume histograms for the clinical target volume (CTV) for all ten temperature distributions for each patient and investigated the relationship between GG volume and change in ΔT₅₀ (temperature increase at 50% of CTV volume). We determined location and volume of normal tissue receiving a high thermal dose.

RESULTS

GG volume on CBCT varied greatly (9-991 cm³). ΔT₅₀ increased for increasing GG volume; maximum ΔT₅₀ difference per patient was 0.4-0.6 °C. The risk for GG-associated treatment-limiting hot spots appeared low. Normal tissue high-temperature regions mostly occurred anteriorly; their volume and maximum temperature showed moderate positive correlations with GG volume, while fat-muscle interfaces were associated with higher risks for hot spots.

CONCLUSIONS

Considerable changes in volume and position of gastrointestinal gas can occur and are associated with clinically relevant tumor temperature differences.

Whither Magnetic Hyperthermia? A Tentative Roadmap

The scientific community has made great efforts in advancing magnetic hyperthermia for the last two decades after going through a sizeable research lapse from its establishment. All the progress made in various topics ranging from nanoparticle synthesis to biocompatibilization and in vivo testing have been seeking to push the forefront towards some new clinical trials. As many, they did not go at the expected pace. Today, fruitful international cooperation and the wisdom gain after a careful analysis of the lessons learned from seminal clinical trials allow us to have a future with better guarantees for a more definitive takeoff of this genuine nanotherapy against cancer. Deliberately giving prominence to a number of critical aspects, this opinion review offers a blend of state-of-the-art hints and glimpses into the future of the therapy, considering the expected evolution of science and technology behind magnetic hyperthermia.

[Low-dose irradiation of non-malignant diseases: Did we throw the baby out with the bathwater?]

The irradiation of non-malignant diseases, essentially for anti-inflammatory purpose, have been largely proposed and performed worldwide until the 1970-80s. At that time, the better assessment of the radio-induced malignancies, essentially in children and young patients, as well as the efficacy of the new anti-inflammatory drugs (steroids and non-steroids), led to the almost disappearance of those techniques, at least in France. In contrast, our German colleagues are still going on treating about 50,000 patients per year for non-malignant (more or less severe) diseases. After a short historical overview, the present article suggests that we were possibly going too far in the rejection of those low-dose irradiations for benign lesions. The recent emergence of new preclinical data, the better understanding of the risk of radio-induced secondary tumours (almost nil in the elderly), and the severity of some situations, such as the cytokine storm of the COVID-19, should probably lead us to reconsider those low - and sometimes very low (less than 1Gy) - irradiations for well-selected indications in the elderly.

Increasing the efficiency of the retinoblastoma brachytherapy protocol with ultrasonic hyperthermia and gold nanoparticles: a rabbit model

PURPOSE

This study purposed to evaluate the efficacy of brachytherapy with the modality of ultrasonic hyperthermia in the presence of gold nanoparticles (GNPs) on an ocular retinoblastoma tumor in an animal model of the rabbit.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retinoblastoma tumor was induced by the injection of the human cell line of Y79 in rabbit eyes (n = 41). After two weeks, tumor size reached a diameter of about 5-7 mm. Seven groups were involved: control, GNPs injection, hyperthermia, hyperthermia with GNPs injection, brachytherapy with I-125, a combination of hyperthermia and brachytherapy, and a combination of brachytherapy, hyperthermia and, GNPs. The tumor area was measured using B-mode ultrasound images on the zero-day and at the end of the third week. The groups were evaluated for a histopathological study of tumor necrosis.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between the relative area changes of tumor in the combination group with the other study groups (p < .05). The results of histopathologic studies confirmed the necrosis of living retinoblastoma cells.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy of brachytherapy and hyperthermia with GNPs reduces the relative size of the tumor. This method increases the necrosis percentage of retinoblastoma and significantly reduces the retinoblastoma mass in the rabbit eyes.

Regional deep hyperthermia in combination with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in poor prognosis patients with brain metastases

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to assess for the first time, the role of regional deep hyperthermia in combination with radiotherapy and systemic therapy in patients with poor prognosis of brain metastases (GPI ≤ 2.5).

METHODS

Patients with confirmed cerebral metastases and classified as GPI score ≤ 2.5 were included in this prospective study. Pretreatment stratification was defined as patients with 0-1 GPI score (Group A) and patients with 1.5-2.5 GPI score (Group B). HT was applied twice a week, 60 min per session, during RT by regional capacitive device (HY-DEEP 600WM system) at 13.56 MHz radiofrequency.

RESULTS

Between June 2015 and June 2017, 15 patients and a total of 49 brain metastases were included in the protocol. All patients received all HT sessions as planned. RT and systemic therapy were also completed as prescribed. Tolerance to treatment was excellent and no toxicity was registered. Patients with HT effective treatment time longer than the median (W90time > 88%) showed better actuarial PFS at 6 and 12 months (100% and 66.7%, respectively) compared to those with less HT effective treatment time (50% and 0%, respectively) (p < 0.031). Median OS was 6 months (range 1-36 months). Stratification by GPI score showed a median OS of 3 months (CI 95% 2.49-3.51) in Group A and 8.0 months (CI 95% 5.15-10.41) in Group B (p = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

Regional hyperthermia is a feasible and safe technique to be used in combination with RT in brain metastases patients, improving PFS and survival in poor prognostic brain metastasis patients.

Cancer therapy with iron oxide nanoparticles: Agents of thermal and immune therapies

Significant research and preclinical investment in cancer nanomedicine has produced several products, which have improved cancer care. Nevertheless, there exists a perception that cancer nanomedicine 'has not lived up to its promise' because the number of approved products and their clinical performance are modest. Many of these analyses do not consider the long clinical history and many clinical products developed from iron oxide nanoparticles. Iron oxide nanoparticles have enjoyed clinical use for about nine decades demonstrating safety, and considerable clinical utility and versatility. FDA-approved applications of iron oxide nanoparticles include cancer diagnosis, cancer hyperthermia therapy, and iron deficiency anemia. For cancer nanomedicine, this wealth of clinical experience is invaluable to provide key lessons and highlight pitfalls in the pursuit of nanotechnology-based cancer therapeutics. We review the clinical experience with systemic liposomal drug delivery and parenteral therapy of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) with iron oxide nanoparticles. We note that the clinical success of injectable iron exploits the inherent interaction between nanoparticles and the (innate) immune system, which designers of liposomal drug delivery seek to avoid. Magnetic fluid hyperthermia, a cancer therapy that harnesses magnetic hysteresis heating is approved for treating humans only with iron oxide nanoparticles. Despite its successful demonstration to enhance overall survival in clinical trials, this nanotechnology-based thermal medicine struggles to establish a clinical presence. We review the physical and biological attributes of this approach, and suggest reasons for barriers to its acceptance. Finally, despite the extensive clinical experience with iron oxide nanoparticles new and exciting research points to surprising immune-modulating potential. Recent data demonstrate the interactions between immune cells and iron oxide nanoparticles can induce anti-tumor immune responses. These present new and exciting opportunities to explore additional applications with this venerable technology. Clinical applications of iron oxide nanoparticles present poignant case studies of the opportunities, complexities, and challenges in cancer nanomedicine. They also illustrate the need for revised paradigms and multidisciplinary approaches to develop and translate nanomedicines into clinical cancer care.

Radiosensitization by Hyperthermia: The Effects of Temperature, Sequence, and Time Interval in Cervical Cell Lines

Cervical cancers are almost exclusively caused by an infection with the human papillomavirus (HPV). When patients suffering from cervical cancer have contraindications for chemoradiotherapy, radiotherapy combined with hyperthermia is a good treatment option. Radiation-induced DNA breaks can be repaired by nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR). Hyperthermia can temporarily inactivate homologous recombination. Therefore, combining radiotherapy with hyperthermia can result in the persistence of more fatal radiation-induced DNA breaks. However, there is no consensus on the optimal sequence of radiotherapy and hyperthermia and the optimal time interval between these modalities. Moreover, the temperature of hyperthermia and HPV-type may also be important in radiosensitization by hyperthermia. In this study we thoroughly investigated the impact of different temperatures (37–42 °C), and the sequence of and time interval (0 up to 4 h) between ionizing radiation and hyperthermia on HPV16⁺: SiHa, Caski; HPV18⁺: HeLa, C4I; and HPV⁻: C33A, HT3 cervical cancer cell lines. Our results demonstrate that a short time interval between treatments caused more unrepaired DNA damages and more cell kill, especially at higher temperatures. Although hyperthermia before ionizing radiation may result in slightly more DNA damage, the sequence between hyperthermia and ionizing radiation yielded similar effects on cell survival.

Molecular and biological rationale of hyperthermia as radio- and chemosensitizer

Mild hyperthermia, local heating of the tumour up to temperatures <43 °C, has been clinically applied for almost four decades and has been proven to substantially enhance the effectiveness of both radiotherapy and chemotherapy in treatment of primary and recurrent tumours. Clinical results and mechanisms of action are discussed in this review, including the molecular and biological rationale of hyperthermia as radio- and chemosensitizer as established in in vitro and in vivo experiments. Proven mechanisms include inhibition of different DNA repair processes, (in)direct reduction of the hypoxic tumour cell fraction, enhanced drug uptake, increased perfusion and oxygen levels. All mechanisms show different dose effect relationships and different optimal scheduling with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Therefore, obtaining the ideal multi-modality treatment still requires elucidation of more detailed data on dose, sequence, duration, and possible synergisms between modalities. A multidisciplinary approach with different modalities including hyperthermia might further increase anti-tumour effects and diminish normal tissue damage.

Role of Simulations in the Treatment Planning of Radiofrequency Hyperthermia Therapy in Clinics

Hyperthermia therapy is a treatment modality in which tumor temperatures are elevated to higher temperatures to cause damage to cancerous tissues. Numerical simulations are integral in the development of hyperthermia treatment systems and in clinical treatment planning. In this study, simulations in radiofrequency hyperthermia therapy are reviewed in terms of their technical development and clinical aspects for effective clinical use. This review offers an overview of mathematical models and the importance of tissue properties; locoregional mild hyperthermia therapy, including phantom and realistic human anatomy models; phase array systems; tissue damage; thermal dose analysis; and thermoradiotherapy planning. This review details the improvements in numerical approaches in treatment planning and their application for effective clinical use. Furthermore, the modeling of thermoradiotherapy planning, which can be integrated with radiotherapy to provide combined hyperthermia and radiotherapy treatment planning strategies, are also discussed. This review may contribute to the effective development of thermoradiotherapy planning in clinics.

Hyperthermia with radiotherapy reduces tumour alpha/beta: Insights from trials of thermoradiotherapy vs radiotherapy alone

PURPOSE

Hyperthermia inhibits the repair of irradiation-induced DNA damage and thereby could alter the α/β values of tumours. This study estimates the clinical α/β_HTRT values from clinical trials of thermoradiotherapy (HTRT) vs radiotherapy (RT) in recurrent breast (RcBC), head and neck (III/IV) (LAHNC) and cervix cancers (IIB-IVA) (LACC).

METHODS

Three recently published meta-analyses for HTRT vs RT in RcBC, LAHNC and LACC were evaluated for complete response (CR). Studies with specified RT dose (D), dose/fraction (d) and corresponding CRs were selected. Tumour biological effective dose (BED) for each study with RT (BED_RT) was computed assuming an α/β_RT of 10 Gy. As outcomes were favourable with HTRT, thermoradiobiological BED (BED_HTRT) was calculated as a product of BED_RT and %CR_HTRT/%CR_RT. The α/β_HTRT was estimated as Dd/(BED_HTRT - D).

RESULTS

12 trials with 864 patients were shortlisted - RcBC (3 studies, n = 259), LAHNC (5 studies, n = 338) and LACC (4 studies, n = 267). Overall risk difference of 0.28 favoured HTRT (p < 0.001). Mean BED_RT and BED_HTRT were 64.7 Gy (SD: ±15.5) and 109.5 Gy (SD: ±32.1) respectively and global α/β_HTRT was 2.25 Gy (SD: ±0.79). Mean α/β_HTRT for RcBC, LAHNC and LACC were 2.05 Gy, 1.74 Gy and 3.03 Gy respectively. On meta-regression, α/β_HTRT was the sole predictor for the corresponding risk differences of the studies (coefficient = -0.096; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Thermoradiobiological effects on the repair of RT induced DNA damage results in reduction in α/β values of tumours. This should be considered to effectively optimize HTRT dose-fractionation schedules in the clinic.

Feasibility of a deep hyperthermia and radiotherapy programme for advanced tumors: first Spanish experience

BACKGROUND

Hyperthermia (HT) is used to increase the temperature of the tumor-sensitizing cells to the effects of radiation/chemotherapy. We aimed to assess the feasibility, tolerability and safety of hyperthermia treatment in a Radiation Oncology Department.

METHODS

Between June 2015 and June 2017, 106 patients and a total of 159 tumor lesions were included in a prospective study (EudraCT 2018-001089-40) of HT concomitant with radiotherapy (RT). Systemic treatment was accepted. HT was given twice a week, 60 min per session, during RT treatment by a regional capacitive device (HY-DEEP 600WM system) at 13.56 MHz radiofrequency.

RESULTS

Most lesions (138 cases, 86.8%) received all HT sessions planned. Thirteen lesions (12 patients) withdrew treatment due to grade ≥3 QMHT toxicity. All these 12 patients completed the prescribed radiotherapy and/or systemic treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Regional hyperthermia is a feasible and safe technique to be used in combination with radiotherapy and systemic treatment.

Ultrasound Hyperthermia Technology for Radiosensitization

Hyperthermia therapy (HT) raises tissue temperature to 40-45°C for up to 60 min. Hyperthermia is one of the most potent sensitizers of radiation therapy (RT). Ultrasound-mediated HT for radiosensitization has been used clinically since the 1960s. Recently, magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU), which has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for thermal ablation therapy, has been adapted for HT. With emerging clinical trials using MRgHIFU HT for radiosensitization, there is a pressing need to review the ultrasound HT technology. The objective of this review is to overview existing HT technology, summarize available ultrasound HT devices, evaluate clinical studies combining ultrasound HT with RT and discuss challenges and future directions.

Quantitative Estimation of the Equivalent Radiation Dose Escalation using Radiofrequency Hyperthermia in Mouse Xenograft Models of Human Lung Cancer

Hyperthermia is a potent radiosensitizer, and its effect varies according to the different types of cancer cells. In the present study, the radiosensitizing effect of hyperthermia on lung cancer cell lines A549 and NCI-H1299 was determined based on the equivalent radiation dose escalation. In vitro cell experiments were conducted using lung cancer cell lines A549 and NCI-H1299 to determine thermal radiosensitivity. In vivo experiments were conducted using mouse heterotopic xenograft models to determine the treatment response and increase in the temperature of tumors using a 13.56 MHz radiofrequency (RF) hyperthermia device. Using the α and β values of the linear–quadratic equations of cell survival curves, numerical simulations were performed to calculate the equivalent radiation dose escalations. The dielectric properties of tumors were measured, and their effect on the calculated equivalent radiation dose was analyzed. Hyperthermia increased the equivalent radiation dose of lung cancer xenografts and a higher escalation was found in NCI-H1299 cells compared with that observed in A549 cells. An underestimation of the calculated equivalent radiation dose was observed when the dielectric property of the tumor was varied. This study may contribute to the effective planning of thermoradiotherapy in clinics.

Mild hyperthermia as a localized radiosensitizer for deep-seated tumors: investigation in an orthotopic prostate cancer model in mice

OBJECTIVE:

Non-ablative or mild hyperthermia (HT) has been shown in preclinical (and clinical) studies as a localized radiosensitizer that enhances the tumoricidal effects of radiation. Most preclinical in vivo HT studies use subcutaneous tumor models which do not adequately represent clinical conditions (e.g. proximity of normal/critical organs) or replicate the tumor microenvironment-both of which are important factors for eventual clinical translation. The purpose of this work is to demonstrate proof-of-concept of locoregional radiosensitization with superficially applied, radiofrequency (RF)-induced HT in an orthotopic mouse model of prostate cancer.

METHODS:

In a 4-arm study, 40 athymic male nude mice were inoculated in the prostate with luciferase-transfected human prostate cancer cells (PC3). Tumor volumes were allowed to reach 150-250 mm3 (as measured by ultrasound) following which, mice were randomized into (i) control (no intervention); (ii) HT alone; (iii) RT alone; and (iv) HT + RT. RF-induced HT was administered (Groups ii and iv) using the Oncotherm LAB EHY-100 device to achieve a target temperature of 41 °C in the prostate. RT was administered ~30 min following HT, using an image-guided small animal radiotherapy research platform. In each case, a dual arc plan was used to deliver 12 Gy to the target in a single fraction. One animal from each cohort was euthanized on Day 10 or 11 after treatment for caspase-9 and caspase-3 Western blot analysis.

RESULTS:

The inoculation success rate was 89%. Mean tumor size at randomization (~16 days post-inoculation) was ~189 mm3 . Following the administration of RT and HT, mean tumor doubling times in days were: control = 4.2; HT = 4.5; RT = 30.4; and HT + RT = 33.4. A significant difference (p = 0.036) was noted between normalized nadir volumes for the RT alone (0.76) and the HT + RT (0.40) groups. Increased caspase-3 expression was seen in the combination treatment group compared to the other treatment groups.

CONCLUSION:

These early results demonstrate the successful use of external mild HT as a localized radiosensitizer for deep-seated tumors.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:

We successfully demonstrated the feasibility of administering external mild HT in an orthotopic tumor model and demonstrated preclinical proof-of-concept of HT-based localized radiosensitization in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Hyperthermia: The Optimal Treatment to Overcome Radiation Resistant Hypoxia

Regions of low oxygenation (hypoxia) are a characteristic feature of solid tumors, and cells existing in these regions are a major factor influencing radiation resistance as well as playing a significant role in malignant progression. Consequently, numerous pre-clinical and clinical attempts have been made to try and overcome this hypoxia. These approaches involve improving oxygen availability, radio-sensitizing or killing the hypoxic cells, or utilizing high LET (linear energy transfer) radiation leading to a lower OER (oxygen enhancement ratio). Interestingly, hyperthermia (heat treatments of 39⁻45 °C) induces many of these effects. Specifically, it increases blood flow thereby improving tissue oxygenation, radio-sensitizes via DNA repair inhibition, and can kill cells either directly or indirectly by causing vascular damage. Combining hyperthermia with low LET radiation can even result in anti-tumor effects equivalent to those seen with high LET. The various mechanisms depend on the time and sequence between radiation and hyperthermia, the heating temperature, and the time of heating. We will discuss the role these factors play in influencing the interaction between hyperthermia and radiation, and summarize the randomized clinical trials showing a benefit of such a combination as well as suggest the potential future clinical application of this combination.

Re‑irradiation plus hyperthermia for recurrent pediatric sarcoma; a simulation study to investigate feasibility

Recurrent pediatric tumors pose a challenge since treatment options may be limited, particularly after previous irradiation. Positive results have been reported for chemotherapy and hyperthermia, but the combination of re‑irradiation and hyperthermia has not been investigated thus far, although it is a proven treatment strategy in adults. The theoretical feasibility of re‑irradiation plus hyperthermia was investigated for infield recurrent pediatric sarcoma in the pelvic region and the extremities. A total of 46 recurrent pediatric sarcoma cases diagnosed at the Academic Medical Center (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) between 2002 and 2017 were evaluated. Patients not previously irradiated, outfield recurrences and locations other than the pelvis and extremities were excluded, ultimately yielding four eligible patients: Two with sarcomas in the pelvis and two in an extremity. Re‑irradiation and hyperthermia treatment plans were simulated for 23x2 Gy treatment schedules and weekly hyperthermia. The radiosensitizing effect of hyperthermia was quantified using biological modelling with a temperature‑dependent change in the parameters of the linear‑quadratic model. The possible effectiveness of re‑irradiation plus hyperthermia was estimated by calculating the equivalent radiotherapy dose distribution. Treatment planning revealed that tumors located in the pelvis and the extremities can be effectively heated in children. Equivalent dose distributions indicated that hyperthermic radiosensitization can be quantified as a target‑selective additional D95% of typically 10 Gy, thereby delivering a possibly curative dose of 54 Gy, without substantially increasing the equivalent dose to the organs at risk. Therefore, re‑irradiation plus hyperthermia is a theoretically feasible and possibly effective treatment option for recurrent pediatric sarcoma in the pelvic region and the extremities, and its clinical feasibility is worthy of evaluation.

The effect of time interval between radiotherapy and hyperthermia on planned equivalent radiation dose

PURPOSE

Thermoradiotherapy is an effective treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer. However, the optimal time interval between radiotherapy and hyperthermia, resulting in the highest therapeutic gain, remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the effect of time interval on the therapeutic gain using biological treatment planning.

METHODS

Radiotherapy and hyperthermia treatment plans were created for 15 cervical cancer patients. Biological modeling was used to calculate the equivalent radiation dose, that is, the radiation dose that results in the same biological effect as the thermoradiotherapy treatment, for different time intervals ranging from 0-4 h. Subsequently, the thermal enhancement ratio (TER, i.e. the ratio of the dose for the thermoradiotherapy and the radiotherapy-only plan) was calculated for the gross tumor volume (GTV) and the organs at risk (OARs: bladder, rectum, bowel), for each time interval. Finally, the therapeutic gain factor (TGF, i.e. TER_GTV/TER_OAR) was calculated for each OAR.

RESULTS

The median TER_GTV ranged from 1.05 to 1.16 for 4 h and 0 h time interval, respectively. Similarly, for bladder, rectum and bowel, TER_OARs ranged from 1-1.03, 1-1.04 and 1-1.03, respectively. Radiosensitization in the OARs was much less than in the GTV, because temperatures were lower, fractionation sensitivity was higher (lower α/β) and direct cytotoxicity was assumed negligible in normal tissue. TGFs for the three OARs were similar, and were highest (around 1.12) at 0 h time interval.

CONCLUSION

This planning study indicates that the largest therapeutic gain for thermoradiotherapy in cervical cancer patients can be obtained when hyperthermia is delivered immediately before or after radiotherapy.

Therapeutic hyperthermia

The term hyperthermia broadly refers to either an abnormally high fever or the treatment of a disease by the induction of fever. Its effect depends on the temperature and exposure time. The increasing number of applications and clinical trials at universities, clinics, and hospitals prove the feasibility and applicability of clinical therapeutic hyperthermia. This chapter aims to outline and discuss the means by which electromagnetic energy and other techniques can provide elevation of temperature within the human body. Because of the individual characteristic of each type of treatment, different modalities of heating systems have evolved. The chapter concludes with a discussion of challenges and opportunities for further improvement in technology and routine clinical application.

The clinical benefit of hyperthermia in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

In pancreatic cancer, which is therapy resistant due to its hypoxic microenvironment, hyperthermia may enhance the effect of radio(chemo)therapy. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the validity of the hypothesis that hyperthermia added to radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy improves treatment outcome for pancreatic cancer patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We searched MEDLINE and Embase, supplemented by handsearching, for clinical studies involving hyperthermia in pancreatic cancer patients. The quality of studies was evaluated using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine levels of evidence. Primary outcome was treatment efficacy; we calculated overall response rate and the weighted estimate of the population median overall survival (m_p) and compared these between hyperthermia and control cohorts.

RESULTS

Overall, 14 studies were included, with 395 patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic cancer of whom 248 received hyperthermia. Patients were treated with regional (n = 189), intraoperative (n = 39) or whole-body hyperthermia (n = 20), combined with chemotherapy, radiotherapy or both. Quality of the studies was low, with level of evidence 3 (five studies) and 4. The six studies including a control group showed a longer m_p in the hyperthermia groups than in the control groups (11.7 vs. 5.6 months). Overall response rate, reported in three studies with a control group, was also better for the hyperthermia groups (43.9% vs. 35.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperthermia, when added to chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, may positively affect treatment outcome for patients with pancreatic cancer. However, the quality of the reviewed studies was limited and future randomised controlled trials are needed to establish efficacy.

Association of elevated reactive oxygen species and hyperthermia induced radiosensitivity in cancer stem-like cells

Cancer stem-like cells (CSCs) are the principal causes of tumor radio-resistance, dormancy and recurrence after radiotherapy. Clinical trials show hyperthermia (HT) might be a potent radiation sensitizer. In this study, CSCs were found to be more susceptible to radiation when combined with HT treatment. Treated cells showed significantly reduced self-renewal, cell survival and proliferation in vitro, as well as significant reduced tumor formation in vivo. Further study demonstrated that the radiosensitization effect was associated with increased intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) level in CSCs, confirmed by modifying redox status in CSCs bidirectionally. Pharmacologic depletion of glutathione by buthionine sulphoximine mimicked HT induced radiosensitivity in CSCs. Antioxidant N-acetylcysteine could efficiently rescue HT induced radiosensitivity in CSCs. To our knowledge, this may be the first report suggesting the association between elevated intracellular ROS level and HT induced radiosensitization in human breast CSCs and pancreatic CSCs, which might provide new strategy for improving CSCs radiosensitivity.

Integrating Hyperthermia into Modern Radiation Oncology: What Evidence Is Necessary?

Hyperthermia (HT) is one of the hot topics that have been discussed over decades. However, it never made its way into primetime. The basic biological rationale of heat to enhance the effect of radiation, chemotherapeutic agents, and immunotherapy is evident. Preclinical work has confirmed this effect. HT may trigger changes in perfusion and oxygenation as well as inhibition of DNA repair mechanisms. Moreover, there is evidence for immune stimulation and the induction of systemic immune responses. Despite the increasing number of solid clinical studies, only few centers have included this adjuvant treatment into their repertoire. Over the years, abundant prospective and randomized clinical data have emerged demonstrating a clear benefit of combined HT and radiotherapy for multiple entities such as superficial breast cancer recurrences, cervix carcinoma, or cancers of the head and neck. Regarding less investigated indications, the existing data are promising and more clinical trials are currently recruiting patients. How do we proceed from here? Preclinical evidence is present. Multiple indications benefit from additional HT in the clinical setting. This article summarizes the present evidence and develops ideas for future research.

Laser Ablation for Cancer: Past, Present and Future

Laser ablation (LA) is gaining acceptance for the treatment of tumors as an alternative to surgical resection. This paper reviews the use of lasers for ablative and surgical applications. Also reviewed are solutions aimed at improving LA outcomes: hyperthermal treatment planning tools and thermometric techniques during LA, used to guide the surgeon in the choice and adjustment of the optimal laser settings, and the potential use of nanoparticles to allow biologic selectivity of ablative treatments. Promising technical solutions and a better knowledge of laser-tissue interaction should allow LA to be used in a safe and effective manner as a cancer treatment.

Enhancing radiosensitisation of BRCA2-proficient and BRCA2-deficient cell lines with hyperthermia and PARP1-i

Poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase1 (PARP1) is an important enzyme in regulating DNA replication. Inhibition of PARP1 can lead to collapsed DNA forks which subsequently causes genomic instability, making DNA more susceptible in developing fatal DNA double strand breaks. PARP1-induced DNA damage is generally repaired by homologous recombination (HR), in which BRCA2 proteins are essential. Therefore, BRCA2-deficient tumour cells are susceptible to treatment with PARP1-inhibitors (PARP1-i). Recently, BRCA2 was shown to be down-regulated by hyperthermia (HT) temporarily, and this consequently inactivated HR for several hours. In this study, we investigated whether HT exclusively interferes with HR by analysing thermal radiosensitisation of BRCA2-proficient and deficient cells. After elucidating the equitoxicity of PARP1-i on BRCA2-proficient and deficient cells, we studied the cell survival, apoptosis, DNA damage (γ-H2AX foci and comet assay) and cell cycle distribution after different treatments. PARP1-i sensitivity strongly depends on the BRCA2 status. BRCA2-proficient and deficient cells are radiosensitised by HT, indicating that HT does not exclusively act by inhibition of HR. In all cell lines, the addition of HT to radiotherapy and PARP1-i resulted in the lowest cell survival, the highest levels of DNA damage and apoptotic levels compared to duo-modality treatments. Concluding, HT not only inhibits HR, but also has the capability of radiosensitising BRCA2-deficient cells. Thus, in case of BRCA2-mutation carriers, combining HT with PARP1-i may boost the treatment efficacy. This combination therapy would be effective for all patients with PARP1-i regardless of their BRCA status.

A short time interval between radiotherapy and hyperthermia reduces in-field recurrence and mortality in women with advanced cervical cancer

Background

Combined radiotherapy and hyperthermia is a well-established alternative to chemoradiotherapy for advanced stage cervical cancer patients with a contraindication for chemotherapy. Pre-clinical evidence suggests that the radiosensitizing effect of hyperthermia decreases substantially for time intervals between radiotherapy and hyperthermia as short as 1–2 h, but clinical evidence is limited. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of the time interval between external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and same-day hyperthermia on in-field recurrence rate, overall survival and late toxicity in women with advanced stage cervical cancer.

Methods

Patients with advanced stage cervical cancer who underwent a full-course of curative daily EBRT and (4–5) weekly hyperthermia sessions between 1999 and 2014 were included for retrospective analysis. The mean time interval between EBRT fractions and same-day hyperthermia was calculated for each patient; the median thereof was used to divide the cohort in a ‘short’ and ‘long’ time-interval group. Kaplan-Meier analysis and stepwise Cox regression were used to compare the in-field recurrence and overall survival. Finally, high-grade (≥3) late toxicity was compared across time-interval groups. DNA repair suppression is an important hyperthermia mechanism, DNA damage repair kinetics were therefore studied in patient biopsies to support clinical findings.

Results

Included were 58 patients. The 3-year in field recurrence rate was 18% and 53% in the short (≤79.2 min) and long (>79.2 min) time-interval group, respectively (p = 0.021); the 5-year overall survival was 52% and 17% respectively (p = 0.015). Differences between time-interval groups remained significant for both in-field recurrence (HR = 7.7, p = 0.007) and overall survival (HR = 2.3, p = 0.012) in multivariable Cox regression. No difference in toxicity was observed (p = 1.00), with only 6 and 5 events in the short and long group, respectively. The majority of DNA damage was repaired within 2 h, potentially explaining a reduced effectiveness of hyperthermia for long time intervals.

Conclusions

A short time interval between EBRT and hyperthermia is associated with a lower risk of in-field recurrence and a better overall survival. There was no evidence for difference in late toxicity.