Validation of the Asthma Illness Representation Scale-Spanish (AIRS-S)

Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms, Underperception of Respiratory Compromise, and Illness Representations in Black and Latino Children With Asthma

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the associations between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms, underperception of respiratory compromise, and illness representations in Black and Latino children with asthma. We hypothesized that increased child-reported ADHD symptoms, as well as parent reports for their child, would be associated with underperception of respiratory compromise, and maladaptive asthma beliefs.

METHODS

Two hundred ninety-six parent-child dyads were recruited from pediatric asthma and primary care clinics in the Bronx. Participants completed demographic questionnaires, the Conners-3 ADHD Index to measure ADHD symptoms, and the Asthma Illness Representation Scale to assess asthma beliefs. Perception of respiratory compromise was assessed by programmable electronic peak flow monitors that measured the child's subjective estimates of peak expiratory flow (PEF) and actual PEF, with underperception as the primary measure.

RESULTS

Child-reported ADHD symptoms were associated with greater underperception (β = .117, p = .049) of respiratory compromise. Parent-reported ADHD symptoms were associated with greater underperception (β = .129, p = .028) of respiratory compromise. Child-reported ADHD symptoms (β = -.188, p < .001) were associated with more maladaptive asthma beliefs, F(1, 341) = 13.135. Parent-reported ADHD symptoms (β = -.203, p ≤ .001) were associated with more maladaptive asthma beliefs, F(1, 341) = 15.644.

CONCLUSIONS

ADHD symptoms were associated with a greater underperception of respiratory compromise and more maladaptive asthma beliefs. Deficits of attentional processes and/or hyperactivity levels might be contributing factors. We emphasize the need for psychoeducation and interventions that improve perception and health beliefs in children with comorbid ADHD and asthma.

Reduced asthma morbidity during COVID-19 in minority children: is medication adherence a reason?

OBJECTIVES

Asthma control improved during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study examined objectively measured medication adherence, asthma morbidity and quality of life (QoL) outcomes in Black and Latinx children by month for January-June 2019 (pre-COVID) compared to January-June 2020 (including first peak of COVID).

METHODS

Secondary analyses of 94 children with asthma (ages 10-17 years, 64% Latinx, 36% Black) and their caregivers assigned to the comparison group of a longitudinal RCT intervention trial. Outcomes included mean aggregate electronic adherence for controller medications, oral steroid bursts, acute healthcare utilization, caregiver asthma QoL, and the Asthma Control Test. Repeated measures analyses were conducted due to multiple observations.

RESULTS

Adherence to controller medications declined 48% from 2019 to 2020 (LS Mean = 33.9% vs. 17.6%, p=.0004, f=.92) with levels reaching a low in May 2020. A reduction in steroid bursts was observed over the same timeframe, 1.29 vs. 0.61, p = 0.006, f=.63. Caregiver QoL increased from 2019 to 2020 on total score (5.18 vs. 5.85, p = 0.002, f=.72), activity limitations (5.04 vs. 5.95), and emotional functioning (5.26 vs. 5.80). Although not statistically significant, a clinically meaningful 62% reduction in acute healthcare visits (p = 0.15) was reported in 2020. Children reported better asthma control (OR = 1.47, 95% CI 1.24, 1.73, p < 0.0001) in 2020 versus 2019 driven by improvements from May to June 2020.

CONCLUSIONS

Decreased asthma morbidity in minority children during COVID was coupled with decreased adherence to controller medications. This observed decrease in morbidity is not explained by improvements in adherence.

Impact of caregiver depression on child asthma outcomes in Mexicans and Puerto Ricans

OBJECTIVE

Examine whether caregiver depressive symptoms at baseline predict longitudinal child asthma outcomes in the two populations with the largest asthma disparities: Mexicans and Puerto Ricans.

METHODS

Two hundred and sixty-seven Hispanic caregiver-child dyads (Mexican = 188, Puerto Rican = 79; children 5-12 years) were recruited from clinics and hospitals in Phoenix, AZ and the Bronx, NY. The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale assessed caregiver depressive symptoms; higher scores indicate greater depressive symptomology. Medical records verified child asthma diagnosis. Assessments for outcome variables occurred at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12-month follow-ups. Pulmonary function was measured by spirometry, asthma control was measured by the Asthma Control Test, steroid bursts and acute healthcare utilization were assessed by caregiver report and medical records, and adherence was measured by doser devices on controller medications. Structural equation modeling analyzed baseline caregiver depressive symptoms as a predictor of longitudinal child asthma outcomes, and differences between subgroups.

RESULTS

Higher caregiver depressive symptoms predicted better pulmonary function (β = .02, p = .001) in Mexican children, and fewer steroid bursts (β = -.41, p = .01) and better medication adherence (β = .02, p = .07) in Puerto Rican children. Caregiver depressive symptoms did not predict pediatric asthma control or acute healthcare utilization in either subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

Caregiver depressive symptomology had unexpected effects on child asthma outcomes. Results may be explained by the Hispanic paradox, caregiver resilience, acculturation, and the study's longitudinal nature. Further research is needed on social determinants of health that may influence differences in child asthma outcomes in heterogeneous Hispanic communities.

Racial Inequities in Asthma Care

Racial inequities in asthma care are evolving as a recognized factor in long-standing inequities in asthma outcomes (e.g., hospitalization and mortality). Little research has been conducted regarding the presence or absence of racial inequities among patients seen in asthma specialist settings, this is an important area of future research given that asthma specialist care is recommended for patients experiencing the poor asthma outcomes disproportionately experienced by Black and Hispanic patients. This study provides a systematic review of racial asthma care inequities in asthma epidemiology, clinical assessment, medication prescription, and asthma specialist referral practices.

Explanatory Model for Asthma Disparities in Latino Children: Results from the Latino Childhood Asthma Project

BACKGROUND

Little research has been conducted that integrates, in one explanatory model, the multitude of factors potentially leading to disparities among Latino children.

PURPOSE

A longitudinal, observational study tested an explanatory model for disparities in asthma control between Mexican and Puerto Rican children with persistent asthma requiring daily controller medication use.

METHODS

Mexican and Puerto Rican children aged 5-12 years (n = 267) and their caregivers (n = 267) were enrolled and completed interviews and child spirometry at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postenrollment. A 12 month retrospective children's medical record review was completed. Participants were recruited from two school-based health clinics and the Breathmobile in Phoenix, AZ, and two inner-city hospital asthma clinics in the Bronx, NY.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences in the social/contextual predictors of asthma illness representations (IRs) were noted between Mexican and Puerto Rican caregivers. The structural equation model results revealed differences in asthma control over time by ethnicity. This model accounted for 40%-48% of the variance in asthma control test scores over 12 months. Caregivers' IRs aligned with the professional model of asthma management were associated with better children's asthma control across 1 year. These results also supported the theoretical notion that IRs change over time impacting caregivers' treatment decisions and children's asthma control.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings extend a previous cross-sectional model test using a more comprehensive model and longitudinal data and highlight the importance of considering within-group differences for diagnosis and treatment of children coming from the vastly heterogeneous Latino umbrella group.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial number NCT01099800.

The Adaptive Effect of Illness-Specific Panic-Fear on Asthma Outcomes in Mexican and Puerto Rican Children

OBJECTIVE

To examine baseline measures of illness-specific panic-fear (ie, the level of anxiety experienced specifically during asthma exacerbations) as a protective factor in pediatric asthma outcomes over a 1-year period.

STUDY DESIGN

The sample comprised 267 children (Mexican, n = 188; Puerto Rican, n = 79; age 5-12 years) from a longitudinal observational study conducted in Phoenix, AZ and Bronx, NY. Assessments were done at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The Childhood Asthma Symptom Checklist was administered at baseline to children and caregivers to assess children's illness-specific panic-fear. Asthma outcome variables quantified longitudinally included pulmonary function, the Asthma Control Test, acute healthcare utilization, and medication adherence, measured by devices attached to inhaled corticosteroids.

RESULTS

Child report of illness-specific panic-fear at baseline predicted higher forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) % across 1-year follow-up in Mexican children (β = 0.17, P = .02), better asthma control in Puerto Rican children (β = 0.45, P = .007), and less acute healthcare utilization for asthma in both groups (Mexicans: β = -0.39, P = .03; Puerto Ricans: β = -0.47, P = .02). Caregiver report of child panic-fear predicted higher FEV₁% in Mexican (β = 0.30; P = .02) and Puerto Rican (β = 0.19; P = .05) children. Panic-fear was not related to medication adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

Illness-specific panic-fear had beneficial effects on asthma outcomes in both groups of Latino children. The heightened vigilance associated with illness-specific panic-fear may lead children to be more aware of their asthma symptoms and lead to better strategies for asthma management.

Illness representations and cultural practices play a role in patient-centered care in childhood asthma: experiences of Mexican mothers

OBJECTIVE

Patients' cultural health beliefs and behaviors may conflict with biomedical healthcare values and practices potentially leading to non-adherence with asthma treatment regimens. To optimize shared decision-making, healthcare providers should understand and be sensitive to these cultural beliefs and behaviors and negotiate an asthma management plan acceptable to parents. The purpose of this study was to obtain the perspective of Mexican mothers regarding (1) their experiences of living with a child with asthma, (2) their understanding of the nature of asthma, and (3) how their cultural beliefs influence asthma management.

METHODS

A qualitative, phenomenological study design was employed to assess mothers' lived experiences with and perceptions of their child's asthma. Individual in-depth interviews were conducted with a purposeful sample of 20 Mexican mothers of children ages 5-17 years with asthma. An inductive, theory-driven, phenomenological analysis approach was used to elicit thematic findings.

RESULTS

Mothers expressed a symptomatic perception of asthma and limited understanding of the disease. Most believe the disease is present only when their child is symptomatic. Many are surprised and puzzled by the unpredictability of their child's asthma attacks, which they report as sometimes "silent". The inconsistency of triggers also leads to frustration and worry, which may reflect their concerns around daily controller medication use and preference for alternative illness management strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our clinical encounters should be refocused to better understand the context of these families' lives and the cultural lens through which they view their child's asthma.

The relationship between caregivers' post-traumatic stress disorder and their asthma health beliefs in an ethnic minority inner-city sample

OBJECTIVE

Caregivers' asthma health beliefs can impact healthcare decisions. This study aimed to determine whether caregivers with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) had asthma illness representations less aligned with the professional model of asthma management and whether their children had worse asthma control.

METHODS

Participants were 120 children with asthma (age M = 9.25 ± 1.37) and their caregivers recruited from the Bronx, NY, USA. Participants were Puerto Rican (n = 55), African-American (n = 30), Afro-Caribbean (n = 22), and Mexican (n = 13). Caregivers completed: a psychiatric interview to determine diagnosis of PTSD, anxiety and depressive disorders; the Asthma Illness Representation Scale (AIRS) to assess beliefs about their children's asthma; and the childhood asthma control test (C-ACT).

RESULTS

One in five caregivers had PTSD, and these caregivers had lower total AIRS scores, lower scores on the AIRS Emotional Aspects of Medication Use subscale, and the AIRS Nature of Symptoms subscale, indicating illness beliefs less aligned with the professional model. Caregivers with PTSD were more likely to perceive asthma as an acute, difficult to control illness and focused on the emotional aspects of medication use. There was no relationship between PTSD in caregivers and self-report of their children's asthma control, but children with poorly controlled asthma had caregivers with lower total AIRS scores.

CONCLUSION

Caregivers' traumatic experiences impact their beliefs about their children's asthma. Future interventions targeting these beliefs could improve the manner in which they understand and treat their children's asthma.