Investigation of knowledge of asthma and inhaler devices in pharmacy workers

Role of Community Pharmacist in Asthma Management: Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice

Purpose

To investigate knowledge, attitude, and practice of asthma management counseling and the perceived barriers by community pharmacists.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted on 416 community pharmacists using an online-based questionnaire. The questionnaire included five parts that assessed socio-demographics and medical references used to seek drug-related information, pharmacists' knowledge (7 items), attitudes (5 items), practice (22 items) and the barriers for the provision of asthma management counseling (10 items). Binary logistic regression was conducted to find the variables that were significantly and independently associated with knowledge, attitude and asthma management counseling practice.

Results

Increased years of experience was associated with decreased knowledge (OR = 0.918, 95% Cl (0.869:0.970), P = 0.002) and less positive attitude toward asthma management (OR = 0.876, 95% Cl. (0.821:0.935), P < 0.001), while working in independent community pharmacy (OR = 2.097, 95% Cl. (1.273:3.454), P = 0.004) and increased awareness of asthma management guidelines (OR = 1.60, 95% CI. (1.044:2.453), P = 0.031) increased the odds of being in the high knowledge group. In contrast, increasing the daily number of pharmacy visitors OR = 1.009, 95% Cl. (1.001:1.016), P = 0.024) and having a pharmacy degree (OR = 2.330, 95% Cl. (1.256:4.326), P = 0.007) increased the odds of having a positive attitude. Male pharmacists (OR = 0.553, 95% Cl. (0.350:0.873), P = 0.011) and having bachelor in pharmacy (OR = 0.354, 95% Cl. (0.179:0.700), P = 0.003) decreased the odds of being in the high practice group. On the other hand, increased awareness of asthma management guidelines tripled the odds of being in the high practice group (OR = 3.067, 95% Cl. (1.964:4.787), P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The current study findings offer valuable insights into the gaps in knowledge, attitude, and practice of asthma management counseling among community pharmacists, as well as the barriers and factors that impede the provision of these services. These insights serve as a guide for developing future strategies aimed at enhancing the role of pharmacists in asthma care.

A systematic review of methods of scoring inhaler technique

Many inhaler devices are currently used in clinical practice to deliver medication, with each inhaler device offering different benefits to overcome technique issues. Inhaler technique remains poor, contributing to reduced airway drug deposition and consequently poor disease control. Scoring inhaler technique has been used within research as an outcome measure of inhaler technique assessment, and this systematic review collates and evaluates these scoring methods. The review protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020218869). A total of 172 articles were screened with 77 included, and the results presented using narrative synthesis due to the heterogeneity of the study design and data. The most frequently used scoring method awarded one point per step in the inhaler technique checklist and was included in 59/77 (77%) of articles; however limited and varied guidance was provided for score interpretation. Other inhaler technique scoring methods included grading the final inhaler technique score, expressing the total score as a percentage/ratio, deducting points from the final score when errors were made, and weighting steps within the checklist depending on how crucial the step was. Vast heterogeneity in the number of steps and content in the inhaler technique checklists was observed across all device types (range 5-19 steps). Only 4/77 (5%) of the inhaler technique measures had undertaken fundamental steps required in the scale development process for use in real world practice. This review demonstrates the demand for a tool that measures inhaler technique and highlights the current unmet need for one that has undergone validation.

Evaluation of real-life data on the use of inhaler devices, including satisfaction and adherence to treatment, by community pharmacists in partnership with pulmonary disease specialists

OBJECTIVE

The use of inhaler device (UID) and the satisfaction and adherence of patients to treatment were evaluated by Istanbul city community pharmacists to obtain real-life data from patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHODS

Pharmacists educated by pulmonary disease specialists asked patients who combined medications with inhaler devices to fill out a questionnaire prepared by the specialists. Each patient's UID was checked, and their errors were corrected by showing them the already prepared standard video of their inhaler device. Afterward, the UID was repeated and rechecked. The visual analog scale (VAS), feeling of satisfaction with the inhaler (FSI-10) questionnaire, and the Morisky Green Levine (MGL) scale were used for symptom control, satisfaction, and adherence, respectively. Then, we compared the results of three different types of inhalers: metered dose inhalers (MDI), dry powder inhalers (DPI), and dry powder inhalation capsules (DPI Caps).

RESULTS

Twenty-seven (19.3%) patients used MDI, 42 (30%) used DPI caps, and 71 (50.7%) used DPI. UID before training was better in patients with DPI than in those with MDI and DPI Cap (p < 0.001). After training, the UID increased in all three groups (p < 0.001). The VAS scores were high in the DPI Caps group than the other groups (p < 0.001). The FSI-10 score was not significantly different among the groups (p > 0.05). Full-adherence was observed in 36.8% of the MDI group, 39.1% of the DPI Caps group, and 21.7% of the DPI groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The partnership between community pharmacists and pulmonary disease specialists improved patients' UID.

Short-acting β2-agonist prescription patterns in patients with asthma in Turkey: results from SABINA III

Background

Over-reliance on short-acting β₂-agonists (SABAs) is associated with poor asthma outcomes. However, the extent of SABA use in Turkey is unclear owing to a lack of comprehensive healthcare databases. Here, we describe the demographics, disease characteristics and treatment patterns from the Turkish cohort of the SABA use IN Asthma (SABINA) III study.

Methods

This observational, cross-sectional study included patients aged ≥ 12 years with asthma from 24 centres across Turkey. Data on sociodemographics, disease characteristics and asthma treatments were collected using electronic case report forms. Patients were classified by investigator-defined asthma severity (guided by the 2017 Global Initiative for Asthma [GINA]) and practice type (primary/specialist care). The primary objective was to describe SABA prescription patterns in the 12 months prior to the study visit.

Results

Overall, 579 patients were included (mean age [standard deviation; SD]: 47.4 [16.1] years; 74.3% female), all of whom were treated by specialists. Most patients had moderate-to-severe asthma (82.7%, GINA steps 3–5), were overweight or obese (70.5%), had high school or university/post-graduate education (51.8%) and reported fully reimbursed healthcare (97.1%). The mean (SD) asthma duration was 12.0 (9.9) years. Asthma was partly controlled/uncontrolled in 56.3% of patients, and 46.5% experienced ≥ 1 severe exacerbation in the preceding 12 months. Overall, 23.9% of patients were prescribed ≥ 3 SABA canisters in the previous 12 months (considered over-prescription); 42.9% received no SABA prescriptions. As few patients had mild asthma, only 5.7% were prescribed SABA monotherapy. Therefore, most patients (61.5%) were prescribed SABA in addition to maintenance therapy, with 42.8% receiving ≥ 3 SABA canisters in the previous 12 months. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), ICS + a long-acting β-agonist fixed-dose combination and oral corticosteroids were prescribed to 14.5%, 88.3% and 28.5% of all patients, respectively. Additionally, 10.2% of patients purchased SABA over the counter, of whom 27.1% purchased ≥ 3 canisters in the preceding 12 months.

Conclusions

Despite all patients being treated by specialists and most receiving fully reimbursed healthcare, nearly a quarter of patients received prescriptions for ≥ 3 SABA canisters in the previous 12 months. This highlights a public health concern and emphasizes the need to align clinical practices with the latest evidence-based recommendations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-022-02008-9.

Knowledge, attitude, and practice of pharmacists regarding asthma management: a cross-sectional study in Egypt

Background

Asthma is a significant public health issue that poses a substantial health and economic burden. Despite the availability of effective asthma medications, its management remain suboptimal. Recent asthma guidelines have highlighted the importance of pharmacist unique position and its interventional strategies in positively impacting asthma treatment outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the degree of Egyptian pharmacists’ knowledge, attitudes, as well as their practices towards asthma management in line with the recent asthma guidelines.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted among 800 pharmacists working in different private and governmental sectors. The data were collected using a 37-item pre-validated self-administered KAP questionnaire. The data were analyzed using Student’s t-test and analysis of variance to assess the association between each KAP level and the sociodemographic variables at the significance level of 0.05.

Results

Of the 800 distributed questionnaire, a total of 550 participants (316 Male, and 234 Female) responded, representing a 68.7% response rate. The mean ± SD score of knowledge, attitude, practice, and barrier was 5.49 ± 1.65 (min = 0; max = 8), 23.5 ± 2.84 (min = 15, max = 30), 43.12 ± 8.61 (min = 28, max = 62), and 27.76 ± 3.72 (min = 17, max = 39), respectively. The results showed that poor knowledge, attitude, and practice scores were achieved by 30.54, 0, and 38.72% of participants, respectively.

Conclusion

Our findings revealed the inconsistencies between poor pharmacists’ knowledge and practices with respect to their positive attitudes. The lack of pharmacists’ knowledge and compliance to recent GINA guidelines in this study highlight the crucial need for effective Educational strategies that should better equip pharmacists for their potential role in asthma care.

Assessment of Poor Inhaler Technique in Older Patients with Asthma or COPD: A Predictive Tool for Clinical Risk and Inhaler Performance

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Older patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are particularly susceptible to inhaler technique errors and poor clinical outcomes. Several factors may influence their risk, but most studies are inconsistent and contradictory. We developed a tool for the major predictors of individual risk in these patients.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

In this multicentre, cross-sectional study, several demographic, socioeconomic and clinical characteristics were collected as potential predictors. Clinical features and inhaler technique performance were the main outcomes. Linear and logistic regression models were set up to identify significant variables. Subgroup analysis was performed according to age, cognitive performance and different types of inhalers.

RESULTS

We included 130 participants, mean age of 74.4 (± 6.4) years. Mean years of device use were 5.8 (± 7.3). Inhaler errors affected 71.6% (95% CI 64-78.5) and critical mistakes 31.1% (95% CI 24-38.8). There were respiratory comorbidities in 82.3% of participants, and 56.2% had moderate to severe disease. A predictive score of misuse probability was developed for clinical practice, including points attributable to cognitive score, adherence and having received previous education on a placebo device. Other significant variables of individual risk were having respiratory allergies or comorbidities, smoking status, depression and educational level. Worse performance was detected in cognitively impaired patients older than 75 years who were using dry powder inhalers (DPI). Lung function was associated with smoking load, incorrect dose activation and absent end pause after inhalation.

CONCLUSIONS

Individual risk assessment in older individuals should focus on inhaler technique performance (mainly on dose activation and end pause) and adherence, smoking, respiratory comorbidities and cognitive impairment. Placebo device training provided by doctors seems to best suit these patients.

Understanding the Knowledge Gap and Assessing Comfort Level among Healthcare Professionals Who Provide Inhaler Education

Inhaled medications play a pivotal role in the management of COPD and asthma. Provider knowledge and ability to teach various devices is paramount as poor inhaler technique directly correlates with worse disease control. The goal of our survey was to assess the knowledge and comfort level with various inhaled devices among providers involved in patient inhaler education. We constructed a 20-question survey consisting of a five-question Likert scale-based comfort assessment and a 15-question multiple-choice inhaler knowledge test that was distributed both internally and nationwide. Groups surveyed included internal medicine residents, family medicine residents, pulmonary fellows, respiratory therapists, nursing staff, and pharmacists. A total of 557 providers responded to the survey. The overall correct response rate among all respondents was only 47%. There was no significant difference between correct response rates among prescribers (internal medicine residents, family medicine residents, and pulmonary fellows) and non-prescribers (respiratory therapists, nursing staff, and pharmacists), 47% and 47%, respectively (p = 0.6919). However, respiratory therapists had the overall highest correct response rate of 85%. Over 72% of respondents indicated that they educate patients on inhaler technique as part of their clinical duties. Furthermore, the correct response rates for various inhaler devices varied with 55% among metered dose inhalers, 52% among dry powder inhalers, and 34% among soft-mist inhalers. Our study reveals that there is a continued need for education on the subject of inhaler devices among providers given their overall poor knowledge, particularly in an era of fast-changing inhaler devices. We continue without knowing what we teach.

The pharmacists' ability to use pressurized metered-dose inhalers with a spacer device and factors affecting it

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the pharmacists' ability to use pMDIs with a spacer device and the factors that affect this ability.Method: Face to face interviews were conducted with the pharmacists. A nine item questionnaire was completed and the checklist for how to use pMDIs with a spacer device was filled out.Results: A total of 307 pharmacists voluntarily participated in this study. Fifty-six (18.2%) of the pharmacists stated that they did not know how to use pMDIs with a spacer device. These pharmacists were excluded and remaining 251 pharmacists included in the study. Only 100 (39.8%) pharmacists demonstrated all of the inhaler spacer device usage steps correctly. The step in which pharmacists made the most mistakes was "take 5-6 deep and slow breaths, hold for 10 s and slow breaths." Those pharmacists who were more likely to correctly use pMDIs with a spacer device were younger (p = 0.023), had dispensed more asthma medications per day (p < 0.001), had dispensed more asthma medications per day for patients younger than six years of age (p = 0.016), and sold inhaler spacer devices at their pharmacy (p = 0.042).Conclusion: Approximately one third of the pharmacists in the current study were able to correctly demonstrate all of the steps for proper usage of pMDIs with a spacer device, which indicates that pharmacists should be included in the training program and be provided continuous training on the use of pMDIs with a spacer device.

ELLIPTA Dry Powder Versus Metered-Dose Inhalers in an Optimized Clinical Trial Setting

BACKGROUND

Reduced error rates have been demonstrated with the ELLIPTA inhaler versus other commonly used devices.

OBJECTIVE

This phase IV, randomized, crossover study evaluated correct use of ELLIPTA compared with 2 commonly prescribed metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) in adults with asthma and optimized inhaler technique.

METHODS

The study comprised 2 crossover substudies (ELLIPTA vs MDI-1 and ELLIPTA vs MDI-2). Inhaler use was assessed at the start of each period, following instruction from a health care professional, and after 28 days of use without instruction. Data for each inhaler were pooled within substudies, irrespective of treatment sequence; study objectives were addressed in each substudy. The primary end point, percentage of participants making 0 errors after 28 days of use, was analyzed separately for each substudy using a Mainland-Gart test for each ELLIPTA versus MDI comparison.

RESULTS

Correct use rates after 28 days were higher with ELLIPTA than with MDI-1 and MDI-2 (ELLIPTA vs MDI-1, 96% vs 84%; ELLIPTA vs MDI-2, 98% vs 91%). Among discordant cases, statistically significantly more participants correctly used ELLIPTA but made 1 or more overall error with MDIs than did those who correctly used the MDIs but made 1 or more overall error using ELLIPTA (87% vs 13% in both substudies; P < .001 and P = .007 for ELLIPTA vs MDI-1 and ELLIPTA vs MDI-2, respectively). More participants made multiple device errors with MDIs than with ELLIPTA.

CONCLUSIONS

Inhaler technique can be optimized in trial settings. In such settings, ELLIPTA is associated with higher rates of correct use and lower error rates than are MDIs.

Effectiveness of a short training program for community pharmacists to improve knowledge and practice of asthma counselling - A simulated patient study

OBJECTIVE

Community pharmacists can make significant contributions and be an indispensable member in the asthma therapy chain. The present study aimed to investigate the current knowledge level of Vietnamese community pharmacists in asthma counselling and the impact of a short training program on asthma knowledge and practice.

METHOD

300 community pharmacists participated in the study. A knowledge questionnaire about asthma medications and a standardized inhaler checklist were designed to evaluate their knowledge before and after a 4-h training program. Six to eight weeks later, 10 simulated patients were sent to the community pharmacies to evaluate the pharmacists' knowledge and practice.

RESULTS

The training program significantly improved the asthma knowledge score of pharmacists from 5.3 to 17.2 out of a maximum score of 20 (p < 0.001). After the training, the percentage of pharmacists performing correctly inhaler devices increased significantly (0% vs.∼50%, p < 0.001). In the simulated patient study, pharmacists who attended the training demonstrated better asthma knowledge with higher scores (5.4 vs 1.7 out of a maximum score of 7.0, p < 0.001), as well as much better inhaler technique scores (6.1 vs 4.3, out of a maximum score of 8, p < 0.001). These pharmacists achieved higher scores in all aspects encompassing distinguishing controllers and relievers, counselling correctly about adherence, and common side effects.

CONCLUSION

Our results revealed significant knowledge deficiency about asthma among Vietnamese community pharmacists. However, a short training program was effective in upskilling the pharmacists to effectively counsel asthmatic patients about the management of their condition and medications.

Errors in the Use of Inhalers by Health Care Professionals: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Inefficient inhaler technique (IT) compromises the optimal delivery of medication. However, the IT knowledge of health care professionals (HCPs) has received scant attention.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review of published reports assessing the IT proficiency of HCPs in using pressurized metered dose (pMDI) and dry powder (DPI) inhalers.

METHODS

Studies published between 1975 and 2014 that directly assessed the IT skills of HCPs were selected according to predefined selection criteria.

RESULTS

Data were extracted from 55 studies involving 6,304 HCPs who performed 9,996 tests to demonstrate their IT proficiency. Overall, the IT was considered correct in 15.5% of cases (95% confidence interval [CI], 12-19.3), decreasing over time from 20.5% (95% CI, 14.9-26.8) from the early period (defined as 1975-1995) to 10.8% (95% CI, 7.3-14.8) during the late period (1996-2014). The most common errors in the use of pMDIs were as follows: not breathing out completely before inhalation (75%; 95% CI, 56-90), lack of coordination (64%; 95% CI, 29-92), and postinhalation breath-hold (63%; 95% CI, 52-72). The most common errors using DPI were deficient preparation (89%; 95% CI, 82-95), not breathing out completely before inhalation (79%; 95% CI, 68-87), and no breath-hold (76%; 95% CI, 67-84).

CONCLUSIONS

HCPs demonstrated inadequate knowledge of the proper use of inhalers. The poor understanding of the correct use of these devices may prevent these professionals from being able to adequately assess and teach proper inhalation techniques to their patients.

The role of the pharmacy in the management of bronchial asthma: A literature-based evaluation

OBJECTIVE

Pharmacists play a relevant role in the real-life management of asthma because they are a first-line referral for patients. In fact, the role of pharmacies has been underlined and evidenced also in guidelines. Nonetheless, the true effect of pharmacy-based management of asthma has been assessed in only a few studies. We review the available literature on asthma management in a territorial pharmacy setting.

DATA SOURCES

The literature was searched for the keywords pharmacy, bronchial asthma, control, and management.

STUDY SELECTIONS

The available studies were subdivided into observational and interventional and described.

RESULTS

Seven observational studies and 14 interventional trials were found, involving approximately 20,000 individuals. Most of those studies were performed in Europe and Australia. A high proportion of patients had poorly controlled asthma in the observational studies. The active involvement of pharmacists, in the interventional trials, consistently led to an improvement of the quality of life, a better inhalation technique, and a reduction of exacerbations.

CONCLUSION

The literature analysis confirms the relevance of the role of pharmacists in the real-life management of bronchial asthma and underlines the need for a more specific training for those health care professionals.

Empowering family physicians to impart proper inhaler teaching to patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma depend on inhalers for management, but critical errors committed during inhaler use can limit drug effectiveness. Outpatient education in inhaler technique remains inconsistent due to limited resources and inadequate provider knowledge.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a simple, two-session inhaler education program can improve physician attitudes toward inhaler teaching in primary care practice.

METHODS

An inhaler education program with small-group hands-on device training was instituted for family physicians (FP) in British Columbia and Alberta. Sessions were spaced one to three months apart. All critical errors were corrected in the first session. Questionnaires surveying current inhaler teaching practices and attitudes toward inhaler teaching were distributed to physicians before and after the program.

RESULTS

Forty-one (60%) of a total 68 participating FPs completed both before and after program questionnaires. Before the program, only 20 (49%) reported providing some form of inhaler teaching in their practices, and only four (10%) felt fully competent to teach patients inhaler technique. After the program, 40 (98%) rated their inhaler teaching as good to excellent. Thirty-four (83%) reported providing inhaler teaching in their practices, either by themselves or by an allied health care professional they had personally trained. All stated they could teach inhaler technique within 5 min. Observation of FPs during the second session by certified respiratory educators found that none made critical errors and all had excellent technique.

CONCLUSION

A physician inhaler education program can improve attitudes toward inhaler teaching and facilitate implementation in clinical practices.