A 12-week dose-ranging study of fluticasone propionate powder in the treatment of asthma

The safety of long-term use of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to determine the safety of long-term use of ICS in patients with asthma.

METHODS

A systematic search was made of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov, without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on treatment of asthma with ICS, compared with non-ICS treatment (placebo or other active drugs), were reviewed.

RESULTS

Eighty-six RCTs (enrolling 51,538 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Oral or oropharyngeal candidiasis (RR 2.58, 95% CI 2.00 to 3.33), and dysphonia/hoarseness (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.85) were less frequent in the control group. There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of upper respiratory tract infection, lower respiratory tract infection, influenza, decline in bone mineral density, and fractures between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In addition to the mild local adverse events, the long-term use of ICS was safe in patients with asthma.

Glucocorticoid induced adrenal insufficiency

Synthetic glucocorticoids are widely used for their anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive actions. A possible unwanted effect of glucocorticoid treatment is suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, which can lead to adrenal insufficiency. Factors affecting the risk of glucocorticoid induced adrenal insufficiency (GI-AI) include the duration of glucocorticoid therapy, mode of administration, glucocorticoid dose and potency, concomitant drugs that interfere with glucocorticoid metabolism, and individual susceptibility. Patients with exogenous glucocorticoid use may develop features of Cushing's syndrome and, subsequently, glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome when the treatment is tapered down. Symptoms of glucocorticoid withdrawal can overlap with those of the underlying disorder, as well as of GI-AI. A careful approach to the glucocorticoid taper and appropriate patient counseling are needed to assure a successful taper. Glucocorticoid therapy should not be completely stopped until recovery of adrenal function is achieved. In this review, we discuss the factors affecting the risk of GI-AI, propose a regimen for the glucocorticoid taper, and make suggestions for assessment of adrenal function recovery. We also describe current gaps in the management of patients with GI-AI and make suggestions for an approach to the glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome, chronic management of glucocorticoid therapy, and education on GI-AI for patients and providers.

Relative efficacy and safety of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with asthma: Systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are recommended as first-line controller medications for persistent asthma. However, guidelines on the initial ICS doses, step-up and step-down algorithms, and when to switch to combination therapy vary.

OBJECTIVE

To understand the ideal starting doses of ICS therapy based on current evidence and to systematically compare low, moderate, and high starting doses of ICSs as monotherapy and in combination with long-acting β-agonists with respect to efficacy and safety.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant English-language articles published from 1980 to November 17, 2018. Randomized controlled trials with adult, steroid-naive, ICS-free (for ≥4 weeks) patients with asthma and a duration of 4 weeks or longer with an ICS treatment arm (monotherapy or combination therapy) were included. Separate fixed-effects Bayesian network meta-analyses were conducted on the extracted data for peak expiratory flow, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, nighttime rescue medication use, nighttime symptom score, and study withdrawal because of an adverse event.

RESULTS

A total of 31 randomized controlled trials were analyzed. All starting doses of ICSs were comparable with respect to nighttime rescue medication use, nighttime symptom score, change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and study withdrawal because of an adverse event. Significant improvement in morning peak expiratory flow was observed with high-dose ICSs and with low- and moderate-dose ICSs and long-acting β-agonists than with low-dose ICSs.

CONCLUSION

Overall, a high starting dose of ICSs had no additional clinical benefit in 3 of the 4 efficacy parameters compared with low or moderate ICS doses for controlling moderate to severe asthma but might have potential safety concerns.

Randomized, dose-ranging study of a fluticasone propionate multidose dry powder inhaler in adolescents and adults with uncontrolled asthma not previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids

OBJECTIVE

A novel, inhalation-driven, multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) eliminates the need to coordinate actuation with inhalation. To characterize dose response, efficacy, and safety of fluticasone propionate (Fp) MDPI, a dose-ranging study was conducted with placebo and active comparators.

METHODS

This 12-week, double-blind, parallel-group study randomized patients aged ≥12 years with uncontrolled persistent asthma not previously treated with inhaled corticosteroid therapy (N = 622) to twice-daily treatment with Fp MDPI (12.5, 25, 50, or 100 µg), placebo MDPI, or open-label Fp dry powder inhaler (DPI) 100 µg. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline over 12 weeks in trough (morning pre-dose and pre-rescue bronchodilator) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁). Blood samples were collected from a patient subset to evaluate pharmacokinetics. Adverse events were monitored.

RESULTS

Fp MDPI 25, 50, and 100 µg significantly improved change from baseline in trough FEV₁ over 12 weeks compared with placebo (p < 0.01). There were no substantial differences in FEV₁ change from baseline over 12 weeks between any Fp MDPI dose and Fp DPI 100 µg. Maximum observed concentration (C_max) of Fp increased with increasing Fp MDPI doses; time of C_max was similar across doses and treatments. Systemic exposures for Fp MDPI 25 and 50 µg were lower than that for Fp DPI 100 µg. The safety profile of Fp MDPI was consistent with that of Fp DPI.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, Fp MDPI 25 and 50 µg provided comparable efficacy and safety to Fp DPI 100 µg, with lower systemic exposure.

Adrenal Insufficiency in Corticosteroids Use: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to estimate pooled percentages of patients with adrenal insufficiency after treatment with corticosteroids for various conditions in a meta-analysis. Secondly, we aimed to stratify the results by route of administration, disease, treatment dose, and duration.

METHODS

We searched seven electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, COCHRANE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and CINAHL/Academic Search Premier) in February 2014 to identify potentially relevant studies. Original articles testing adult corticosteroid users for adrenal insufficiency were eligible.

RESULTS

We included 74 articles with a total of 3753 participants. Stratified by administration form, percentages of patients with adrenal insufficiency ranged from 4.2% for nasal administration (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-28.9) to 52.2% for intra-articular administration (95% CI, 40.5-63.6). Stratified by disease, percentages ranged from 6.8% for asthma with inhalation corticosteroids only (95% CI, 3.8-12.0) to 60.0% for hematological malignancies (95% CI, 38.0-78.6). The risk also varied according to dose from 2.4% (95% CI, 0.6-9.3) (low dose) to 21.5% (95% CI, 12.0-35.5) (high dose), and according to treatment duration from 1.4% (95% CI, 0.3-7.4) (<28 d) to 27.4% (95% CI, 17.7-39.8) (>1 year) in asthma patients.

CONCLUSIONS

1) Adrenal insufficiency after discontinuation of glucocorticoid occurs frequently; 2) there is no administration form, dosing, treatment duration, or underlying disease for which adrenal insufficiency can be excluded with certainty, although higher dose and longer use give the highest risk; 3) the threshold to test corticosteroid users for adrenal insufficiency should be low in clinical practice, especially for those patients with nonspecific symptoms after cessation.

Inhaled corticosteroids in children with persistent asthma: dose-response effects on growth

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the first-line treatment for children with persistent asthma. Their potential for growth suppression remains a matter of concern for parents and physicians.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether increasing the dose of ICS is associated with slower linear growth, weight gain and skeletal maturation in children with asthma.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of trials (CAGR) and the ClinicalTrials.gov website up to March 2014.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were eligible if they were parallel-group randomised trials evaluating the impact of different doses of the same ICS using the same device in both groups for a minimum of three months in children one to 17 years of age with persistent asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors ascertained methodological quality independently using the Cochrane Risk of bias tool. The primary outcome was linear growth velocity. Secondary outcomes included change over time in growth velocity, height, weight, body mass index and skeletal maturation.

MAIN RESULTS

Among 22 eligible trials, 17 group comparisons were derived from 10 trials (3394 children with mild to moderate asthma), measured growth and contributed data to the meta-analysis. Trials used ICS (beclomethasone, budesonide, ciclesonide, fluticasone or mometasone) as monotherapy or as combination therapy with a long-acting beta2 -agonist and generally compared low (50 to 100 μg) versus low to medium (200 μg) doses of hydrofluoroalkane (HFA)-beclomethasone equivalent over 12 to 52 weeks. In the four comparisons reporting linear growth over 12 months, a significant group difference was observed, clearly indicating lower growth velocity in the higher ICS dose group of 5.74 cm/y compared with 5.94 cm/y on lower-dose ICS (N = 728 school-aged children; mean difference (MD)0.20 cm/y, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02 to 0.39; high-quality evidence): No statistically significant heterogeneity was noted between trials contributing data. The ICS molecules (ciclesonide, fluticasone, mometasone) used in these four comparisons did not significantly influence the magnitude of effect (X(2) = 2.19 (2 df), P value 0.33). Subgroup analyses on age, baseline severity of airway obstruction, ICS dose and concomitant use of non-steroidal antiasthmatic drugs were not performed because of similarity across trials or inadequate reporting. A statistically significant group difference was noted in unadjusted change in height from zero to three months (nine comparisons; N = 944 children; MD 0.15, 95% CI -0.28 to -0.02; moderate-quality evidence) in favour of a higher ICS dose. No statistically significant group differences in change in height were observed at other time points, nor were such differences in weight, bone mass index and skeletal maturation reported with low quality of evidence due to imprecision.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In prepubescent school-aged children with mild to moderate persistent asthma, a small but statistically significant group difference in growth velocity was observed between low doses of ICS and low to medium doses of HFA-beclomethasone equivalent, favouring the use of low-dose ICS. No apparent difference in the magnitude of effect was associated with three molecules reporting one-year growth velocity, namely, mometasone, ciclesonide and fluticasone. In view of prevailing parents' and physicians' concerns about the growth suppressive effect of ICS, lack of or incomplete reporting of growth velocity in more than 86% (19/22) of eligible paediatric trials, including those using beclomethasone and budesonide, is a matter of concern. All future paediatric trials comparing different doses of ICS with or without placebo should systematically document growth. Findings support use of the minimal effective ICS dose in children with asthma.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Does altering the dose of inhaled corticosteroids make a difference in growth among children with asthma?

BACKGROUND

Asthma guidelines recommend inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as the first choice of treatment for children with persistent asthma that is not well controlled when only a reliever inhaler is used to treat symptoms. Steroids work by reducing inflammation in the lungs and are known to control underlying symptoms of asthma. However, parents and physicians remain concerned about the potential negative effect of ICS on growth.

REVIEW QUESTION

Does altering the dose of inhaled corticosteroids make a difference in the growth of children with asthma? WHAT EVIDENCE DID WE FIND?: We studied whether a difference could be seen in the growth of children with persistent asthma who were using different doses of the same ICS molecule and the same delivery device. We found 22 eligible trials, but only 10 of them measured growth or other measures of interest. Overall, 3394 children included in the review combined 17 group comparisons (i.e. 17 groups of children with mild to moderate asthma using a particular dose and type of steroid in 10 trials). Trials used different ICS molecules (beclomethasone, budesonide, ciclesonide, fluticasone or mometasone) either on their own or in combination with a long-acting beta2 -agonist (a drug used to open up the airways) and generally compared low doses of corticosteroids (50 to 100 μg) with low to medium (200 μg) doses of corticosteroids (converted in μg HFA-beclomethasone equivalent) over 12 to 52 weeks.

RESULTS

We found a small but statistically significant group difference in growth over 12 months between these different doses clearly favouring the lower dose of ICS. The type of corticosteroid among newer molecules (ciclesonide, fluticasone, mometasone) did not seem to influence the impact on growth over one year. Differences in corticosteroid doses did not seem to affect the change in height, the gain in weight, the gain in bone mass index and the maturation of bones. QUALITY OF THE EVIDENCE: This review is based on a small number of trials that reported data and were conducted on children with mild to moderate asthma. Only 10 of 22 studies measured the few outcomes of interest for this review, and only four comparisons reported growth over 12 months. Our confidence in the quality of evidence is high for this outcome, however it is low to moderate for several other outcomes, depending on the number of trials reporting these outcomes. Moreover, a few outcomes were reported only by a single trial; as these findings have not been confirmed by other trials, we downgraded the evidence for these outcomes to low quality. An insufficient number of trials have compared the effect of a larger difference in dose, for example, between a high dose and a low dose of ICS and of other popular molecules such as budesonide and beclomethasone over a year or longer of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

We report an evidence-based ICS dose-dependent reduction in growth velocity in prepubescent school-aged children with mild to moderate persistent asthma. The choice of ICS molecule (mometasone, ciclesonide or fluticasone) was not found to affect the level of growth velocity response over a year. The effect of corticosteroids on growth was not consistently reported: among 22 eligible trials, only four comparisons reported the effects of corticosteroids on growth over one year. In view of parents' and clinicians' concerns, lack of or incomplete reporting of growth is a matter of concern given the importance of the topic. We recommend that growth be systematically reported in all trials involving children taking ICS for three months or longer. Until further data comparing low versus high ICS dose and trials of longer duration are available, we recommend that the minimal effective ICS dose be used in all children with asthma.

Inhaled corticosteroids in children with persistent asthma: dose-response effects on growth

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the first-line treatment for children with persistent asthma. Their potential for growth suppression remains a matter of concern for parents and physicians.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether increasing the dose of ICS is associated with slower linear growth, weight gain and skeletal maturation in children with asthma.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of trials (CAGR) and the ClinicalTrials.gov website up to March 2014.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were eligible if they were parallel-group randomised trials evaluating the impact of different doses of the same ICS using the same device in both groups for a minimum of three months in children one to 17 years of age with persistent asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors ascertained methodological quality independently using the Cochrane Risk of bias tool. The primary outcome was linear growth velocity. Secondary outcomes included change over time in growth velocity, height, weight, body mass index and skeletal maturation.

MAIN RESULTS

Among 22 eligible trials, 17 group comparisons were derived from 10 trials (3394 children with mild to moderate asthma), measured growth and contributed data to the meta-analysis. Trials used ICS (beclomethasone, budesonide, ciclesonide, fluticasone or mometasone) as monotherapy or as combination therapy with a long-acting beta2-agonist and generally compared low (50 to 100 μg) versus low to medium (200 μg) doses of hydrofluoroalkane (HFA)-beclomethasone equivalent over 12 to 52 weeks. In the four comparisons reporting linear growth over 12 months, a significant group difference was observed, clearly indicating lower growth velocity in the higher ICS dose group of 5.74 cm/y compared with 5.94 cm/y on lower-dose ICS (N = 728 school-aged children; mean difference (MD)0.20 cm/y, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02 to 0.39; high-quality evidence): No statistically significant heterogeneity was noted between trials contributing data. The ICS molecules (ciclesonide, fluticasone, mometasone) used in these four comparisons did not significantly influence the magnitude of effect (X(2) = 2.19 (2 df), P value 0.33). Subgroup analyses on age, baseline severity of airway obstruction, ICS dose and concomitant use of non-steroidal antiasthmatic drugs were not performed because of similarity across trials or inadequate reporting. A statistically significant group difference was noted in unadjusted change in height from zero to three months (nine comparisons; N = 944 children; MD 0.15, 95% CI -0.28 to -0.02; moderate-quality evidence) in favour of a higher ICS dose. No statistically significant group differences in change in height were observed at other time points, nor were such differences in weight, bone mass index and skeletal maturation reported with low quality of evidence due to imprecision.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In prepubescent school-aged children with mild to moderate persistent asthma, a small but statistically significant group difference in growth velocity was observed between low doses of ICS and low to medium doses of HFA-beclomethasone equivalent, favouring the use of low-dose ICS. No apparent difference in the magnitude of effect was associated with three molecules reporting one-year growth velocity, namely, mometasone, ciclesonide and fluticasone. In view of prevailing parents' and physicians' concerns about the growth suppressive effect of ICS, lack of or incomplete reporting of growth velocity in more than 86% (19/22) of eligible paediatric trials, including those using beclomethasone and budesonide, is a matter of concern. All future paediatric trials comparing different doses of ICS with or without placebo should systematically document growth. Findings support use of the minimal effective ICS dose in children with asthma.

Once-daily fluticasone furoate is efficacious in patients with symptomatic asthma on low-dose inhaled corticosteroids

BACKGROUND

Fluticasone furoate (FF) is an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) with 24-hour activity in development as a once-daily treatment for the long-term management of asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of 4 doses of once-daily FF administered using a dry powder inhaler in patients (≥12 years) with moderate asthma, uncontrolled on low-dose ICS (fluticasone propionate [FP] 200 μg/day or equivalent).

METHODS

This double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study randomized 622 patients to 1 of 6 treatments: FF (100, 200, 300, or 400 μg) once daily in the evening, FP 250 μg twice daily (active control), or placebo for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in predose evening forced expiratory colume in 1 second (FEV1) at week 8.

RESULTS

At week 8, relative to placebo, all doses of FF once daily and FP twice daily demonstrated significantly (P < .001) greater increases from baseline and greater than 200-mL increases in predose FEV1. There was no evidence of a dose-response relationship between FF doses. Improvement with once-daily FF was similar to or greater than that for twice-daily FP. Secondary efficacy endpoint findings generally supported the efficacy of FF 100 to 400 μg once daily, although statistically significant improvements versus placebo in symptom-free 24-hour periods were only reported for FF 400 μg. There were few withdrawals due to lack of efficacy. Oral candidiasis was reported in 0 to 4% of patients; 24-hour urinary cortisol excretion ratios were similar across active treatment groups and not significantly different from placebo.

CONCLUSION

FF 100 to 400 μg once daily in the evening is effective and well tolerated in patients with asthma uncontrolled on low-dose ICS, with 100 μg and 200 μg, considered the most applicable doses in this asthma population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00603278.

Fluticasone versus placebo for chronic asthma in adults and children

BACKGROUND

Inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) is a relatively new inhaled corticosteroid for the treatment of asthma.

OBJECTIVES

To assess efficacy and safety outcomes in studies that compared FP to placebo for treatment of chronic asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register (January 2008), reference lists of articles, contacted trialists and searched abstracts of major respiratory society meetings (1997-2006).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials in children and adults comparing FP to placebo in the treatment of chronic asthma. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and risk of bias.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors extracted data. Quantitative analyses were undertaken using Review Manager software.

MAIN RESULTS

Eighty-six studies met the inclusion criteria, recruiting 16,160 participants. In non-oral steroid treated asthmatics with mild and moderate disease FP resulted in improvements from baseline compared with placebo across all dose ranges (100 to 1000 mcg/d) in FEV1 (between 0.1 to 0.43 litres); morning PEF (between 23 and 46 L/min); symptom scores (based on a standardised scale, between 0.44 and 0.7); reduction in rescue beta-2 agonist use (between 1 and 1.4 puffs/day). High dose FP increased the number of patients who could withdraw from prednisolone: FP 1000-1500 mcg/day Peto Odds Ratio 14.07 (95% CI 7.17 to 27.57). FP at all doses led to a greater likelihood of sore throat, hoarseness and oral Candidiasis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Doses of FP in the range 100-1000 mcg/day are effective. In most patients with mild-moderate asthma improvements with low dose FP are only a little less than those associated with high doses when compared with placebo. High dose FP appears to have worthwhile oral-corticosteroid reducing properties. FP use is accompanied by an increased likelihood of oropharyngeal side effects.

Fluticasone at different doses for chronic asthma in adults and children

BACKGROUND

Inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) is a high-potency inhaled corticosteroid used in the treatment of asthma.

OBJECTIVES

1. To assess the efficacy and safety outcomes of inhaled fluticasone at different nominal daily doses in the treatment of chronic asthma.2. To test for the presence of a dose-response effect.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Trials Register (January 2008).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials in children and adults comparing fluticasone at different nominal daily doses in the treatment of chronic asthma. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and methodological quality.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One review author extracted data. These were checked and verified by a second reviewer. Quantitative analyses where undertaken using Review Manager.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty-one published and unpublished trials (representing 55 group comparisons, 10,797 participants) met the inclusion criteria. In asthmatics with mild to moderate disease who were not on oral steroids, FP did not exhibit a dose-response effect in the lower dose comparisons in FEV1 (50mcg, 100mcg, 200mcg and 4-500mcg daily). There were no statisitically significant differences between 4-500mcg and 800-1000mcg, and between 50-100 and 800-1000mcg of FP. When 200mcg was compared with 800-1000mcg daily FEV1 favoured the four/five fold increase. For PEF, a dose response was present with FP when low and moderate, and low and high doses of FP were compared. There was no evidence of a dose-response effect on symptoms or rescue beta-2 agonist use. The likelihood of hoarseness and oral candidiasis was significantly greater for the higher doses (800 to 1000 microg/day). People with oral steroid-dependent asthma treated with FP (2000 microg/day) were significantly more likely to reduce oral prednisolone than those on 1000 to 1500 microg/day (Peto odds Ratio 2.8, 95% CI 1.3 to 6.3). The highest dose also allowed a significant reduction in daily oral prednisolone dose compared to 1000 to 1500 microg/day (WMD 2.0 mg/day, 95% CI 0.1 to 4.0 mg/day).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We have not found evidence of a pronounced dose response in FEV1 with increasing doses of fluticasone. The number of studies contributing to our primary outcomes was low. At dose ratios of 1:2, there are statistically significant differences in favour of the higher dose in morning peak flow across the low dose range. The clinical impact of these differences is open to interpretation. Patients with moderate disease achieve similar levels of asthma control on medium doses of fluticasone (400 to 500 microg/day) as they do on high doses (800 to 1000 microg/day). More work in severe asthma would help to confirm that doses of FP above 500 microg/day confer greater benefit in this subgroup than doses of around 200 microg/day. In oral corticosteroid-dependent asthmatics, reductions in prednisolone requirement may be gained with FP 2000 microg/day.

The dose-response characteristics of inhaled corticosteroids when used to treat asthma: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews

Inhaled corticosteroids form the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with asthma. A range of compounds are available with a wide range of prescribable doses. In this overview, we summarize the findings from a number of Cochrane systematic reviews that have examined the relative benefits of different doses of beclometasone dipropionate, budesonide and fluticasone propionate when used to treat children and adults. The key findings are that all inhaled corticosteroids demonstrate a dose-response relationship for efficacy measures, but most of the benefit in mild-to-moderate severity disease is gained in the low-to-moderate dose range of each drug. In this group, high doses of fluticasone lead to small improvements in measures of control at the expense of a steep increase in the incidence of oral side-effects. In patients with severe disease who are dependent on oral steroids, there may be appreciable benefit in reducing oral steroids from very high compared with high doses of fluticasone.

Factors influencing the responsiveness to inhaled glucocorticoids of patients with moderate-to-severe asthma

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Inhaled glucocorticoids (GCs) are the most effective control therapy for asthma. Although the clinical effects of inhaled GCs vary, there are few data on the differences in the responsiveness of individuals to inhaled GCs. The purpose of this study was to identify those factors that are associated with responsiveness to high-dose inhaled GCs in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma.

DESIGN

This study was a prospective analysis.

SETTING

Outpatient clinics of tertiary hospitals.

PATIENTS

Eighty-six adult outpatients with moderate-to-severe asthma.

METHODS

Eighty-six patients with asthma who had initial FEV1 values of < 80% predicted after they had received inhaled GCs (fluticasone propionate, 1,000 microg/d) for 4 weeks. The primary end points were FEV1, FEV1/FVC ratio, forced expiratory flow (midexpiratory phase), and the score at presentation in the asthma-related quality-of-life questionnaire (AQLQ).

RESULTS

The inhalation of GCs for 4 weeks had significant improvements in the FEV1% predicted and in the AQLQ score compared with the baseline values. Asthmatic patients with responses of > 12% (n = 46, 53.4%) in the change in FEV1 (deltaFEV1 = [FEV1 at 4 weeks--baseline FEV1]/baseline FEV1 x 100) also had significantly higher proportions of blood eosinophils and lower FEV1 values (in liters) prior to treatment. The change in FEV1 values correlated with the number of sputum eosinophils prior to GC inhalation (r = 0.242; p < 0.05) and correlated inversely with the FEV1 percent predicted values prior to GC inhalation (r = -0.462; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The FEV1 percent predicted and the blood and sputum eosinophil levels prior to GC inhalation are associated with the responsiveness to inhaled GCs in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma.

Fluticasone versus placebo for chronic asthma in adults and children

BACKGROUND

Inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) is a relatively new inhaled corticosteroid for the treatment of asthma.

OBJECTIVES

1. To assess efficacy and safety outcomes in studies that compared FP to placebo for treatment of chronic asthma.2. To explore the presence of a dose-response effect.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register (January 2005), reference lists of articles, contacted trialists and searched abstracts of major respiratory society meetings (1997-2004).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials in children and adults comparing FP to placebo in the treatment of chronic asthma. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and methodological quality.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers extracted data. Quantitative analyses were undertaken using RevMan 4.2

MAIN RESULTS

Seventy-five studies met the inclusion criteria (14,208 participants). Methodological quality was high. In non-oral steroid treated asthmatics with mild and moderate disease FP resulted in improvements from baseline compared with placebo across all dose ranges (100 to 1000 mcg/d) in FEV1 (between 0.13 to 0.45 litres); morning PEF (between 23 and 47 L/min); symptom scores (based on a standardised scale, between 0.5 and 0.85); reduction in rescue beta-2 agonist use (between 1.2 and 2.2 puffs/day). High dose FP increased the number of patients who could withdraw from prednisolone: FP 1000-1500 mcg/day Peto Odds Ratio 14.07 (95% CI 7.17 to 27.57). FP at all doses led to a greater likelihood of sore throat, hoarseness and oral Candidiasis. Twenty-one patients would need to be treated for one extra to develop Candidiasis (FP 500 mcg/day), whilst only three or four patients need to be treated to avoid one extra patient being withdrawn due to lack of efficacy at all doses of FP.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Doses of FP in the range 100-1000 mcg/day are effective. In most patients with mild-moderate asthma improvements with low dose FP are only a little less than those associated with high doses when compared with placebo. High dose FP appears to have worthwhile oral-corticosteroid reducing properties. FP use is accompanied by an increased likelihood of oropharyngeal side effects.

Efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate administered once-daily in the evening in patients with persistent asthma dependent on inhaled corticosteroids

BACKGROUND

Once-daily dosing with an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) may simplify asthma management and improve patient compliance. Since asthma is frequently worse at night, evening dosing appears to be a more obvious choice to accommodate the chronobiology of asthma than morning dosing.

OBJECTIVE

The primary study objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate (MF) dry powder inhaler (MF-DPI) 400 microg qd PM (one 400 microg inhalation) with placebo for the treatment of asthma in patients previously dependent on twice a day (bid, bis in die) ICS therapy. We also compared different regimens of MF-DPI with each other and with placebo.

METHODS

This 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated lung function and asthma symptoms in 400 subjects with persistent asthma randomized to MF-DPI 200 microg qd (once a day, quaque die) PM, 400 microg qd PM as one inhalation from a 400 microg device, 400 microg qd PM as two inhalations from a 200 microg device, 200 microg twice daily (bid), or placebo. Evening doses were to be taken in the late afternoon or early evening, preferably before dinner time.

RESULTS

Mean changes from baseline at endpoint in FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 s) were similar for MF-DPI 400 microg qd PM (one inhalation; 0.41 L), MF-DPI 400 microg qd PM (2 inhalations; 0.49 L), MF-DPI 200 microg qd PM (0.41 L), and MF-DPI 200 microg bid (0.51 L); and all were significantly improved compared with placebo (0.16 L; p < 0.001). Secondary efficacy variables, including nocturnal awakenings and use of rescue albuterol, were also significantly improved with MF-DPI treatment compared with placebo. All treatments were generally safe and well tolerated, with adverse events of mild to moderate severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily evening dosing of MF-DPI at doses of 400 and 200 microg restored lung function and improved nocturnal and daytime symptom control in subjects with asthma previously dependent on bid ICS therapy. Comparable effectiveness of a total daily dose of 400 microg was demonstrated between once daily in the evening and twice-daily administration. The results also confirm the effectiveness of MF-DPI 200 microg qd PM, the lowest dose studied.

Inhaled fluticasone at different doses for chronic asthma in adults and children

BACKGROUND

Inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) is a high-potency inhaled corticosteroid used in the treatment of asthma.

OBJECTIVES

1. To assess the efficacy and safety outcomes of inhaled fluticasone at different nominal daily doses in the treatment of chronic asthma. 2. To test for the presence of a dose-response effect.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Trials Register (January 2005) and reference lists of articles. We contacted trialists and pharmaceutical companies for additional studies and searched abstracts of major respiratory society meetings (1997 to 2004).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials in children and adults comparing fluticasone at different nominal daily doses in the treatment of chronic asthma. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and methodological quality.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One reviewer extracted data. These were checked and verified by a second reviewer. Quantitative analyses where undertaken using RevMan (Analyses 1.0.2).

MAIN RESULTS

Forty-three studies (45 data sets with 8913 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality was high. In asthmatics with mild to moderate disease who were not on oral steroids a dose-response effect was present with FP for change in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF). For low doses (100 versus 200 microg/day) the weighted mean difference (WMD) was 6.29 litres/min, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.28 to 10.29. Comparing medium (400 to 500 microg/day) to low dose (200 microg/day) FP the WMD was 6.46 litres/min (95% CI 3.02 to 9.89); this effect was more pronounced in one trial with more severely asthmatic children. For FP 100 versus 400 to 500 microg/day the WMD was 8 litres/min (95% CI 1 to 15) and at high versus low doses (800 to 1000 versus 50 to 100 microg/d) the WMD was 22 litres/min (95% CI 15 to 29). When high and medium doses were compared there was no significant difference in the change in morning PEF: at 400 to 500 versus 800 to 1000 microg/day the WMD was 0.16 litres/min (95% CI 6.95 to 6.63). There was no dose-response effect on symptoms or rescue beta-2 agonist use. The likelihood of hoarseness and oral candidiasis was significantly greater for the higher doses (800 to 1000 microg/day). People with oral steroid-dependent asthma treated with FP (2000 microg/day) were significantly more likely to reduce oral prednisolone than those on 1000 to 1500 microg/day (Peto odds Ratio 2.8, 95% CI 1.3 to 6.3). The highest dose also allowed a significant reduction in daily oral prednisolone dose compared to 1000 to 1500 microg/day (WMD 2.0 mg/day, 95% CI 0.1 to 4.0 mg/day).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Effects of fluticasone are dose dependent but relatively small. At dose ratios of 1:2, there are significant differences in favour of the higher dose in morning peak flow across the low dose range. The clinical impact of these differences is open to interpretation. Patients with moderate disease achieve similar levels of asthma control on medium doses of fluticasone (400 to 500 microg/day) as they do on high doses (800 to 1000 microg/day). More work in severe asthma would help to confirm that doses of FP above 500 microg/day confer greater benefit in this subgroup than doses of around 200 microg/day. In oral corticosteroid-dependent asthmatics, reductions in prednisolone requirement may be gained with FP 2000 microg/day.

Initial starting dose of inhaled corticosteroids in adults with asthma: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Asthma guidelines vary in their recommendations for the initial dose of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) in asthma. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to establish the optimal starting dose of ICS for asthma in adults.

METHODS

Randomised controlled trials comparing two doses of the same ICS in adults with asthma and no concomitant inhaled or oral corticosteroid were assessed. Included trials were analysed according to the following ICS dose comparisons: high (> or =800 microg/day beclomethasone (BDP)) versus moderate (400<800 microg/day BDP) (n = 7); moderate versus low (<400 microg/day BDP) (n = 6); step down versus constant dose (n = 4).

RESULTS

Fourteen publications describing 13 trials were included in the review. Studies (n = 4) that compared a step down approach with a constant moderate/low dose of ICS found no difference in lung function, symptoms, or rescue medications between the two treatment approaches (p>0.05). There was no difference in the change in morning peak flow after treatment with high compared with moderate dose ICS. When compared with low dose ICS, moderate dose ICS significantly improved morning peak flow (change from baseline WMD 11.14 l/min, 95% CI 1.34 to 20.93) and nocturnal symptoms (SMD -0.29, 95% CI -0.53 to -0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with asthma who require ICS, starting with a moderate dose is equivalent to starting with a high dose and stepping down. The small non-significant benefits of starting with a high ICS dose are not of sufficient clinical benefit to warrant its use. Initial moderate ICS doses appear to be more effective than an initial low ICS dose.

Add-on therapy options in asthma not adequately controlled by inhaled corticosteroids: a comprehensive review

Many patients with persistent asthma can be controlled with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). However, a considerable proportion of patients remain symptomatic, despite the use of ICS. We present systematically evidence that supports the different treatment options. A literature search was made of Medline/PubMed to identify randomised and blinded trials. To demonstrate the benefit that can be obtained by increasing the dose of ICS, dose-response studies with at least three different ICS doses were identified. To demonstrate whether more benefit can be obtained by adding long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA), leukotriene antagonist (LTRA) or theophylline than by increasing the dose of ICS, studies comparing these options were identified. Thirdly, studies comparing the different "add-on" options were identified. The addition of a LABA is more effective than increasing the dose of ICS in improving asthma control. By increasing the dose of ICS, clinical improvement is likely to be of small magnitude. Addition of a LTRA or theophylline to the treatment regimen appears to be equivalent to doubling the dose of ICS. Addition of a LABA seems to be superior to an LTRA in improving lung function. However, addition of LABA and LTRA may be equal with respect to asthma exacerbations. However, more and longer studies are needed to better clarify the role of LTRAs and theophylline as add-on therapies.

Systematic review of the dose-response relation of inhaled fluticasone propionate

AIMS

To examine the dose-response relation of inhaled fluticasone for both efficacy and adrenal function in children with asthma.

METHODS

Systematic review of double blind randomised dose-response studies of fluticasone in children of at least 4 weeks duration.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

FEV1, morning peak expiratory flow, night awakenings, beta agonist use, major exacerbations, 12 or 24 hour urinary cortisol, peak plasma cortisol post-stimulation.

RESULTS

Seven studies of 1733 children with asthma met the inclusion criteria for efficacy. The dose-response curve for each efficacy outcome measure suggested that the response began to plateau between 100 and 200 microg per day with additional efficacy at the 400 microg per day dose shown in one study of severe asthmatics. Five studies of 1096 children with asthma met the inclusion criteria for assessment of adrenal function. The largest placebo controlled study of 437 children reported no difference in 24 hour urinary cortisol between placebo and fluticasone at doses of 100 and 200 microg per day. The non-placebo controlled study of 528 children reported significant suppression of overnight urinary cortisol levels with fluticasone at 400 compared with 200 microg per day.

CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient data to determine the dose-response of fluticasone in children at doses >400 microg per day. The dose-response curve for fluticasone appears to plateau between 100 and 200 microg per day for efficacy. There was additional efficacy at the 400 microg per day dose in children with severe asthma; however there was evidence of adrenal suppression at this dose.

Oral corticosteroid-sparing effects of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of persistent and acute asthma

OBJECTIVE

To review the efficacy and safety of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) when used to reduce daily oral corticosteroid (OCS) requirements in patients with severe persistent asthma and periodic requirements in patients with acute asthma exacerbations.

DATA SOURCES

Clinical studies of the OCS-sparing effects of ICSs were located by searching MEDLINE databases from 1966 onward using the terms oral, steroid, and asthma in combination with the generic names for each marketed ICS.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies reporting on the use of ICSs to reduce OCS requirements in patients with persistent and acute asthma are included.

RESULTS

Clinical study results consistently show that ICSs significantly improve asthma control and reduce OCS requirements among adults, children, and infants with persistent asthma. A dose reduction or complete discontinuation of use of OCSs is possible in most patients without loss of asthma control. ICSs also can control asthma during acute asthma exacerbations and reduce the need for short courses of OCSs. With many ICSs, the reductions in OCS use are accompanied by recovery of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function, indicating that the safety of asthma therapy is improved when OCS requirements are decreased with ICSs. Of the available ICSs that may reduce OCS needs, budesonide appears to be the most intensively studied.

CONCLUSIONS

ICSs can reduce OCS requirements in adults and children with persistent asthma and during acute asthma exacerbations. The reduced systemic corticosteroid activity associated with ICS treatment improves the overall safety of asthma therapy.

Risk-benefit value of inhaled glucocorticoids: a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic perspective

Inhaled glucocorticoids induce therapeutic and adverse systemic effects via the same types of receptors. Analysis of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters of inhaled glucocorticoids generates a risk-benefit value (RBV). Targeted efficacy with minimal adverse effects helps to quantify an appropriate RBV. High lung deposition/targeting, high receptor binding, longer pulmonary retention, and high lipid conjugation are among the pharmacokinetic parameters to be considered for improved efficacy of the compound. Low or negligible oral bioavailability, small particle size and inactive drug at the oropharynx, high plasma protein binding, rapid metabolism, high clearance, and lower systemic concentrations are associated with low risks for adverse effects. Inhaled glucocorticoid potency is enhanced by solution inhalers, which result in higher pulmonary deposition and minimize local adverse effects. These properties, among others, determine the efficacy and safety of inhaled glucocorticoids. Currently available inhaled glucocorticoids do not provide the complete pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters to optimize RBV, leaving room for improvement in the development of future agents.

High dose versus low dose inhaled corticosteroid as initial starting dose for asthma in adults and children

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) form the basis of maintenance therapy in asthma and their efficacy is well established. However, the optimal starting dose of ICS is not clearly established. Recent reviews demonstrate a relatively flat efficacy curve for ICS and increasing side effects with increasing ICS doses. High doses are frequently prescribed and there are now reports of significant side effects occurring with high dose ICS use. These issues demonstrate the need to establish the optimal starting dose of ICS in asthma.

OBJECTIVES

To establish the optimal starting dose of ICS by evaluating the efficacy of initial high dose ICS with low dose ICS in subjects with asthma, not currently on ICS.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group trials register and reference lists of articles. Date of last search: January 2003

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of two different doses of the same ICS in adults and children with asthma with no concomitant ICS or OCS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trial quality was assessed and data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Study authors were contacted for confirmation. Trials were analysed according to the following ICS dose comparisons: step down vs constant dose ICS (n=7); high vs moderate (n=11); high vs low (n=9); moderate vs low (n=11); fold change in dose (all studies).

MAIN RESULTS

31 papers reporting the results of 26 trials were included in the review. For studies that compared a step down approach to a constant moderate/low ICS dose, there were no significant differences in lung function, symptoms, rescue medications or asthma control between the two treatment approaches. Significant but clinically small improvements in percent predicted FEV(1) ( WMD 5.32, 95% CI 0.65 to 9.99) and non significant improvements in the change in morning PEF were found for high dose ICS compared to moderate dose ICS. There were no significant differences in efficacy between high and low dose ICS. For moderate dose ICS, compared to low dose ICS, there were significant improvements in the change in morning PEF l/min from baseline (WMD 11.14, 95% CI 1.34 to 20.93) and nocturnal symptoms (SMD -0.29, 95% CI -0.53 to -0.06 ). Commencing ICS at double or quadruple a base moderate or low dose had no greater effect than commencing with the base dose. Several studies reported greater improvement in airway hyperresponsiveness for high dose ICS.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

For patients with asthma who require ICS, commencing with a moderate dose ICS is equivalent to commencing with a high dose ICS and down-titrating. The small significant benefits of commencing with a high ICS dose are not of sufficient clinical benefit to warrant its use when compared to moderate or low dose ICS. Initial moderate ICS dose appears to be more effective than initial low ICS dose. High dose ICS may be more effective than moderate or low dose ICS for airway hyperresponsiveness. There is no benefit in doubling or quadrupling ICS in subjects with stable asthma.

Effects of varying doses of fluticasone propionate on the physiology and bronchial wall immunopathology in mild-to-moderate asthma

OBJECTIVES

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are typically associated with a flat dose-response curve when traditional efficacy values are examined (eg, FEV(1)). The aim of the present study was to investigate if a dose-response relationship exists for lung function and inflammatory cell numbers in bronchial biopsy specimens.

METHODS

Bronchial biopsy specimens were obtained from 36 patients randomized to receive 100 micro g, 500 microg, or 2,000 microg/d of fluticasone propionate (FP). Lung physiology and bronchial biopsies were performed at baseline and after 2 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

Improvement in lung function and suppression of airway inflammation were optimal at a dose of 500 microg/d of FP. Significant changes from baseline following treatment were documented in FEV(1) (p = 0.02), forced expiratory flow (p = 0.002), FEV(1)/FVC (p = 0.007), provocative concentration of histamine causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) (PC(20)) [p = 0.02], T-cell numbers (p = 0.0005), activated eosinophils (p = 0.01), and numbers of macrophages (p = 0.01) in the group treated with 500 microg/d of FP. Comparison between groups administered different doses of FP failed to demonstrate a dose-response relationship for change from baseline in PC(20) (p = 0.43), any of the lung function parameters, T-cell numbers (p = 0.64), activated T cells (p = 0.46), eosinophils (p = 0.53), activated eosinophils (p = 0.48), or macrophage numbers (p = 0.68).

CONCLUSION

The apparent lack of a dose-response for ICS treatment in patients with asthma further validates the preferential use of add-on therapy over increasing the dose of ICS.

Efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate 250 microg administered once daily in patients with persistent asthma treated with or without inhaled corticosteroids

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown fluticasone propionate (FP) 100, 200, and 500 microg administered once daily to be effective in the treatment of asthma. The efficacy of a once daily regimen of FP 250 microg has not been evaluated previously.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of inhaled FP 250 microg administered once daily in patients currently receiving inhaled short-acting beta-agonists (SABA) alone or inhaled corticosteroids (ICS).

METHODS

In two separate studies, 408 patients in the SABA study and 401 patients in the ICS study were randomly assigned to receive FP 250 microg or placebo for 12 weeks through the Diskus device (GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC) each morning.

RESULTS

At the study endpoint, SABA patients treated with FP and placebo had mean increases in forced expiratory volume in 1 second from baseline of 0.23 +/- 0.03 L and 0.10 +/- 0.03 L, respectively (P < 0.001). ICS patients treated with FP had a mean increase of 0.08 +/- 0.02 L compared with a decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second of -0.08 +/- 0.03 L with placebo (P < 0.001). Changes of similar magnitude in morning peak expiratory flow rates were seen with FP in both the SABA and ICS studies. Fewer FP-treated ICS study patients were withdrawn from the study as a result of predetermined asthma stability criteria and, therefore, those patients had a greater probability of remaining in the study than placebo-treated patients (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

FP 250 microg, once daily, produced greater improvements in pulmonary function and asthma symptom control than placebo. This new treatment regimen provides clinicians with an additional therapeutic option for patients with asthma previously treated with either beta2-agonists alone or ICS.

Seretide for obstructive lung disease

Seretide (Advair [North America], GlaxoSmithKline) is an inhaler combination formulation intended for the maintenance therapy of obstructive airways disease. Seretide was developed and made available initially as three multi-dose, dry powder inhaler formulations delivering 50 microg/puff of the long acting beta(2) agonist salmeterol and either 100, 250 or 500 microg/puff of the inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone propionate. In addition to the initial multi-dose dry powder inhaler system (Diskus or Accuhaler), a chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-free pressurised aerosol formulation has become available. Studied mostly extensively as a maintenance therapy for patients with persistent asthma, the combination inhaler is at least equivalent to its components administered separately and is superior to monotherapy with salmeterol or inhaled corticosteroid in both paediatric and adult populations. The combination has a logical role in the treatment of moderate-to-severe asthma, offering the advantage of increased convenience and possibly improved compliance. In addition to improvements in lung function, symptom scores and quality of life, the combination therapy reduces exacerbation rates, an outcome that contributes to favourable cost-effectiveness. A role as initial maintenance therapy in all forms of persistent asthma is also plausible but there are fewer data concerning the impact of Seretide in milder forms of persistent asthma. Clinical trials are underway to examine the potential role of Seretide in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Salmeterol has been shown to be an effective first-line bronchodilator in COPD and fluticasone has been shown to reduce the frequency and or severity of exacerbations in COPD patients in two key trials. At a time when the prevalence of both asthma and COPD is increasing, Seretide is a valuable step in the management of these common obstructive lung diseases.

A meta-analysis of the dose-response relationship of inhaled corticosteroids in adolescents and adults with mild to moderate persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Although inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are commonly used in the treatment of persistent asthma, the relationship between dose and clinical response remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated whether ICS exhibit a dose-response relationship in the treatment of mild to moderate persistent asthma.

METHODS

This was a meta-analysis of published randomized clinical trials concerning the relationship between ICS dose and response in asthma. Relevant studies were identified through a search of PubMed and MEDLINE for articles on asthma and ICS published between January 1996 and January 2001. The search was limited to publications classified as clinical trials that included the text words asthma and corticosteroids, glucocorticoids, beclomethasone, budesonide, fluticasone, flunisolide, mometasone, or triamcinolone acetonide. Five clinical measures were considered: morning peak expiratory flow rate (AM PEFR), evening PEFR (PM PEFR), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), beta-agonist use, and asthma symptom score (severity of symptoms on a given day, as evaluated by patients).

RESULTS

Forty-three studies were identified, of which 16 met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. These studies involved 4 agents: fluticasone propionate, triamcinolone acetonide, budesonide, and mometasone furoate. A statistically significant dose response in AM PEFR was observed with fluticasone propionate, triamcinolone acetonide, and budesonide (respective 95% CIs, 4.9 to 11.5, 4.7 to 18.0, and 5.8 to 24.9). A statistically significant dose response to fluticasone propionate and triamcinolone acetonide was also observed in PM PEFR (95% CIs, 2.0 to 8.7 and 2.4 to 13.7) and asthma symptom score (95% CI, -0.069 to -0.002 and -0.60 to -0.10). In terms of FEV(1), the dose response was statistically significant only with budesonide (95% CI, 0.025 to 0.17). Dose-response relationships were not disproportionately driven by the highest doses, and the greatest effects on response were seen at doses below or at the low end of the recommended range, suggesting that use of high doses of ICS may contribute only marginally to efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose-response relationships were not uniformly observed with all drugs or for all measures of response. Use of higher doses of ICS in patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma does not appear to increase the efficacy of these drugs.

What are the alternatives to increasing inhaled corticosteroids for the long term control of asthma?

The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines stated the therapeutic goals for the management of asthma and, through a stepwise approach to treatment, defined the various grades of asthma severity and the therapeutic options available to the clinician at each step. This article considers the options at step 3; the management of a patient with poorly controlled asthma who is already taking low-dose inhaled corticosteroids. Before considering a change in therapy, the clinician should rule out alternative diagnoses, confirm compliance with treatment, explore potential exacerbants in the patient's environment and, where possible, remove them. If a change in medication is necessary, the choice of drug will depend on the therapeutic goal that needs to be achieved. If the most important goal is the control of symptoms and optimisation of lung function, most studies support the addition of a long-acting beta(2)-agonist to low dose inhaled corticosteroids. If recurrent severe exacerbations are a major feature of the poor control, increasing the dosage of inhaled corticosteroids may be most effective. The addition of a leukotriene antagonist may be the best choice if exercise-induced symptoms are prominent or in the setting of aspirin-sensitive asthma. General recommendations supported by the findings of large therapeutic trials do not allow for significant variability in the individual response to a particular drug. Receptor polymorphisms have recently been discovered that may account for variability in the response to beta(2)-agonists and leukotriene receptor antagonists. However, until more is known about the reasons behind this variability, a therapeutic trial may be the most effective way of determining the best drug for an individual patient. One of the key developments in asthma over the past decade has been the acceptance of the concept of asthma as a chronic inflammatory disorder of the airways. However, the long term significance of this inflammation is not clear and the importance of control of inflammation beyond the suppression of symptoms, reduction of exacerbation frequency and the optimisation of lung function has not been established.

Dose-response relation of inhaled fluticasone propionate in adolescents and adults with asthma: meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To examine the dose-response relation of inhaled fluticasone propionate in adolescents and adults with asthma.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis of placebo controlled, randomised clinical trials that presented data on at least one outcome measure of asthma and that used at least two different doses of fluticasone.

SETTING

Medline, Embase, and GlaxoWellcome's internal clinical study registers.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

FEV(1), morning and evening peak expiratory flow, night awakenings, beta agonist use, and major exacerbations.

RESULTS

Eight studies, with 2324 adolescents and adults with asthma, met the inclusion criteria. Data on doses of >500 microg/day were limited. The dose-response curve for the raw data began to reach a plateau at around 100-200 microg/day and peaked by 500 microg/day. A negative exponential model for the data, without meta-analysis, indicated that 80% of the benefit at 1000 microg/day was achieved at doses of 70-170 microg/day and 90% by 100-250 microg/day. A quadratic meta-regression showed that the maximum achievable efficacy was obtained by doses of around 500 microg/day. The odds ratio for patients remaining in a study at a dose of 200 microg/day, compared with higher doses, was 0.73 (95% confidence interval 0.49 to 1.08). Comparison of the standardised difference in FEV(1 )for an inhaled dose of 200 microg/day against higher doses showed a difference in FEV(1) of 0.13 of a standard deviation (-0.02 to 0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

In adolescent and adult patients with asthma, most of the therapeutic benefit of inhaled fluticasone is achieved with a total daily dose of 100-250 microg, and the maximum effect is achieved with a dose of around 500 microg/day. However, these findings were limited by the lack of data on individual patients and by the paucity of dose-response studies that included doses of >500 microg/day.

Dose-ranging study of mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler in the treatment of moderate persistent asthma using fluticasone propionate as an active comparator

BACKGROUND

Mometasone furoate (MF; Schering-Plough, Madison, NJ), is a glucocorticoid with high local potency and low potential systemic availability.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the relative efficacy and safety of a new formulation of MF, coupled with a recently designed dry powder inhaler (DPI), in the treatment of patients with moderate persistent asthma. Fluticasone propionate administered by Diskhaler (FP Diskhaler, 250 microg twice a day; Glaxo Wellcome, Research Triangle Park, NC) was used as an active control.

DESIGN

A randomized, parallel group, double-blind (for MF-DPI dosage), evaluator-blind (for MF-DPI vs FP) trial.

SETTING

Sixty centers in 20 countries.

PATIENTS

Seven hundred thirty-three patients with moderate persistent asthma on inhaled corticosteroid treatment.

INTERVENTIONS

Discontinuation of previous inhaled corticosteroid and initiation of one of four study treatments: three doses of MF-DPI (100, 200, and 400 microg twice daily) and one of FP (250 microg twice daily >12 weeks).

RESULTS

FEV1 (primary efficacy variable) was evaluated as the mean change from baseline to endpoint (last evaluable visit). All dosage groups showed improvement at endpoint. Only 400 microg twice daily of MF-DPI (+0.19 L) was statistically different from 100 microg twice daily of MF-DPI (+0.07 L; P = 0.02). MF-DPI (200 microg twice daily) and FP Diskhaler groups showed similar improvement (+0.16 L). Greater improvement in most secondary variables (forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity, and morning and evening peak expiratory flows) also resulted from treatment with 200 or 400 microg twice daily of MF-DPI or with FP Diskhaler, compared with 100 microg twice daily of MF-DPI. Overall, a total daily 800-microg dose of MF-DPI conferred no significant additional benefit >400 microg of MF-DPI. The incidence of oral candidiasis was 1%, 7%, 10%, and 10% in the 100, 200, and 400 microg twice daily of MF-DPI and FP groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A total daily dose of 400 microg of MF-DPI provides clinical benefit comparable to that observed with a total daily dose of 500 microg of FP Diskhaler.

Inhaled mometasone furoate reduces oral prednisone requirements while improving respiratory function and health-related quality of life in patients with severe persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroid therapy in severe persistent asthma has been shown to reduce or eliminate oral corticosteroid (OCS) use while retaining effective asthma control.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the ability of mometasone furoate (MF) delivered by means of dry powder inhaler to reduce daily oral prednisone requirements in OCS-dependent patients with severe persistent asthma.

METHODS

We performed a 12-week, double-blind, placebocontrolled trial (21 centers, 132 patients) comparing 2 doses of MF (400 and 800 microg administered twice daily) with placebo, followed by a 9-month open-label phase in which 128 patients received treatment with MF.

RESULTS

At the endpoint of the double-blind trial, MF 400 and 800 mg twice daily reduced daily OCS requirements by 46.0% and 23.9%, respectively, whereas placebo increased OCS requirements by 164.4% (P <.01). Oral steroids were eliminated in 40%, 37%, and 0% of patients in the MF 400 and 800 mg twice daily and placebo groups, respectively. Pulmonary function and quality of life significantly increased for MF-treated patients. Further reductions in OCS requirements were achieved with long-term MF treatment in the open-label phase.

CONCLUSION

MF inhaled orally as a dry powder is an effective alternative to systemic corticosteroids in patients with severe persistent asthma.

Fluticasone propionate: a potent inhaled corticosteroid for the treatment of asthma

Fluticasone propionate (FP) is a potent inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) for the treatment of asthma. It is currently marketed in both the United States (as Flovent) and Europe (as Flixotide). Fluticasone is available in both aerosolised metered dose inhaler (MDI) and dry powder devices, with dosages ranging from 44-500 micrograms/puff. FP has been extensively studied in both children and adults; efficacy has been documented across the entire spectrum of asthma severity, including corticosteroid-dependent disease. Clinical data with FP strongly corroborates the in vitro pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies that FP is at least twice as potent as beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), budesonide (BUD) or triamcinolone acetonide (TAA). Both objective (lung function) and subjective (symptoms, beta-agonist use and quality of life) outcomes are improved with FP treatment. Extensive post-marketing surveillance with FP suggests that it is more cost-effective than BUD and flunisolide (FLU) when analysed by an overall healthcare cost perspective. Most of the benefits arise from decreased hospitalizations, emergency room visits and physician-office visits. Extensive safety data with FP documents no clinically meaningful effects on bone mass, nor impairment of growth velocity in children. Considering the efficacy and safety data along with the ability to optimise patient's asthma therapy using the delivery devices and strengths available, FP has become a leader in the ICS marketplace to date.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-response study with budesonide Turbuhaler in Japanese asthma patients. Japanese Pulmicort Turbuhaler study group

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the dose-response for inhaled budesonide via Turbuhaler in Japanese patients with mild to moderate asthma.

METHODOLOGY

Inhaled budesonide 100 microg, 200 microg, 400 microg or placebo was administered twice daily via Turbuhaler for 6 weeks, to 267 adult Japanese patients (mean age 51 years) with mild-to-moderate, non-steroid-dependent bronchial asthma, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel group study. The patients had to be symptomatic for more than 3 days/week and have an average morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) 50-80% of predicted normal value.

RESULTS

The response to budesonide was rapid, all treatments showing a significant improvement in morning PEF after 1 week (P<0.05). During week 6, mean improvements of 15, 45, 53 and 71 L/min were observed for the placebo, 200 microg, 400 microg and 800 microg budesonide groups, respectively. Compared with placebo all improvements in the budesonide groups were statistically significant and a significant dose-response was demonstrated (P<0.001). The difference between the 200 microg and 800 microg doses was significant. Also, for several secondary efficacy variables (e.g. evening PEF, symptom score, treatment score, daily activity score and sleep score) significant dose-responses were shown. Other variables included the investigators' assessments of improvement and usefulness. They also showed statistically significant dose-response relationships and confirmed the rapid onset of action. Budesonide was well tolerated at all tested doses, with a low incidence of adverse events, all of which were minor in severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Budesonide Turbuhaler in the doses 100 microg to 400 microg twice daily was effective, well tolerated and showed a rapid onset of action in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma. Dose-response was demonstrated for several variables of clinical efficacy.

A dose-ranging study of fluticasone propionate administered once daily via multidose powder inhaler to patients with moderate asthma

STUDY OBJECTIVE

This dose-ranging study evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of inhaled fluticasone propionate administered once daily via a multidose powder inhaler in patients with moderate asthma (FEV(1), 45 to 75% predicted).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this multicenter trial, 330 patients (> or = 12 years old) previously receiving inhaled corticosteroids or beta(2)-agonists alone were randomized in a double-blind manner to receive fluticasone propionate at 100, 200, or 500 microg once daily or matching placebo for 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Once-daily treatment with fluticasone propionate resulted in an improvement in efficacy variables, such as FEV(1), morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptom scores, nighttime awakenings, albuterol use, and duration of study participation. A dose-related trend was observed for improvements in morning and evening PEF and albuterol use. Statistical significance for pairwise comparisons was achieved for 200 microg and 500 microg fluticasone propionate vs placebo for all efficacy variables, and for 100 microg fluticasone propionate vs placebo for morning and evening PEF at most or all time points. Drug-related adverse events were few (< or = 5%) and mostly related to the topical effects of inhaled corticosteroids. No dose-response effect or clinically relevant differences were observed in morning plasma cortisol concentrations or after cosyntropin stimulation.

CONCLUSION

Once-daily treatment with fluticasone propionate was well tolerated and demonstrated some dose-related trends in improvements in lung function and asthma control in patients with moderate asthma.

Comparison of once- and twice-daily dosing of fluticasone propionate 200 micrograms per day administered by diskus device in patients with asthma treated with or without inhaled corticosteroids

BACKGROUND

There are limited published data regarding the efficacy of once- versus twice-daily administration of flutica-sone propionate.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to evaluate the effectiveness of fluticasone propionate powder 200 microg/d administered as a once- or twice-daily dosage regimen in patients who were currently being treated with bronchodilators only (BD patients) and in patients who required inhaled corticosteroids for maintenance treatment of asthma (ICS patients).

METHODS

Five hundred seventy patients were randomly assigned to receive one of the following inhaled treatments through the Diskus device (Glaxo Wellcome, Research Triangle Park, NC) for 12 weeks: fluticasone propionate 100 microg twice daily (FP100BID) or 200 microg once daily (FP200QD) or placebo.

RESULTS

BD patients treated with FP100BID, FP200QD, and placebo had mean increases in FEV(1) from baseline to end point of 0. 49 L, 0.37 L, and 0.21 L, respectively (P <.001, FP100BID vs placebo; P =.05, FP200QD vs placebo). ICS patients treated with FP100BID and FP200QD had mean increases in FEV(1) of 0.27 L and 0.11 L, respectively, compared with a decrease in FEV(1) of -0.08 L with placebo (P <.001, FP100BID vs placebo; P =.023, FP200QD vs placebo). BD patients treated with FP100BID and FP200QD had mean increases in morning peak expiratory flow from baseline to end point of 31 L/min and 27 L/min, respectively, compared with a 1 L/min increase in patients treated with placebo. ICS patients treated with FP100BID had a mean increase in morning peak expiratory flow (from baseline to end point) of 18 L/min compared with mean decreases of -3 L/min and -12 L/min in the FP200QD and placebo groups, respectively. More patients were withdrawn from placebo (26% and 48%, in BD and ICS patients, respectively) than from fluticasone propionate (7%-9% [BID-QD] and 18%-32% [BID-QD], in BD and ICS patients, respectively) because of failure to meet predetermined asthma stability criteria.

CONCLUSION

The efficacies of FP100BID and FP200QD were comparable with regard to improvement in pulmonary function and asthma stability in BD patients. In ICS patients, asthma control was maintained with FP200QD, whereas FP100BID provided greater improvements in pulmonary function and asthma stability.

Low-dose inhaled fluticasone propionate versus oral zafirlukast in the treatment of persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Few studies have compared the efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids and leukotriene modifiers for the treatment of persistent asthma.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to compare the efficacy of a low dose of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) with that of oral zafirlukast in the treatment of persistent asthma previously treated with short-acting beta(2)-agonists alone.

METHODS

A 12-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study was conducted in 451 patients aged 12 years and older with asthma who were symptomatic on short-acting beta(2)-agonists alone. After an 8- to 14-day run-in period, patients were randomized to treatment with FP 88 microg twice daily or zafirlukast 20 mg twice daily.

RESULTS

Treatment with FP was more effective than treatment with zafirlukast in increasing morning FEV(1) (by 0.42 L vs 0.20 L over baseline, P <.001), morning peak expiratory flow (by 49.94 L/min vs 11.68 L/min over baseline, P <. 001), and evening PEF (by 38.91 L/min vs 10.50 L/min over baseline, P <.001). Statistically significant differences between the two treatments in FEV(1) were noted after the first observation (week 4) and in morning and evening peak expiratory flow by week 2. Mean change in percentage of symptom-free days was greater with FP than with zafirlukast (28.5% of days vs 15.6% of days, P <.001) and FP significantly increased the percentage of rescue-free days by 40.4% of days compared with 24.2% of days with zafirlukast (P <.001). Treatment with FP significantly reduced albuterol use by 2.39 puffs per day compared with 1.45 puffs per day (P <.001) and increased the percentage of nights with no awakenings by 21.2% of nights compared with 8.0% of nights with zafirlukast (P <.001).

CONCLUSION

The clinical effectiveness of a low dose of FP as first-line therapy in patients with persistent asthma who are symptomatic on beta(2)-agonists alone is superior to that of zafirlukast.

Once-daily mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler in the treatment of patients with persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Although inhaled glucocorticoids are recommended for all stages of persistent asthma, compliance with long-term therapy is often poor, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. A simplified, once-daily dosing regimen may foster improved compliance.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily (AM) administration of mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler (MF DPI) 200 microg and 400 microg with placebo in patients with asthma previously maintained only on short-acting inhaled beta-adrenergic receptor agonists.

METHODS

This was a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study. The mean change from baseline to endpoint (last treatment visit) for FEV1 was the primary efficacy variable.

RESULTS

At endpoint, both doses of MF DPI were significantly more effective than placebo (P < or = .05) in improving FEV1. Based on morning peak expiratory flow rate, once-daily MF DPI 400 microg was more effective than placebo (P < or = .001) at endpoint. Both active treatments also demonstrated improvement at endpoint in asthma symptom scores, physician-evaluated response to therapy and use of rescue medication. Although both MF DPI dosages were efficacious, MF DPI 400 microg provided additional improvement in some measures of pulmonary function (eg, morning PEFR) when these agents were administered once daily in the morning. Both doses of MF DPI were well tolerated and treatment-related adverse events occurred at a similar incidence among the three treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that once-daily (AM) MF DPI provides a convenient and effective treatment option for patients with mild or moderate persistent asthma.

Beclomethasone for asthma in children: effects on linear growth

BACKGROUND

Inhaled steroids play a central role in the management of childhood asthma. There is concern about their side effects, especially on growth. However asthma may also cause growth retardation. Growth rates are not stable, so randomised controlled parallel group studies are needed to assess the impact of inhaled steroids on growth. This review is confine to one inhaled steroid, beclomethasone, that is known to have significant levels of systemic absorption.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether inhaled beclomethasone cause significant delay in the linear growth of children with asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Airways Group asthma register was searched. Bibliographies from included studies, and known reviews were searched for additional citations. Personal contact with colleagues and researchers working in the field of asthma were made to identify potentially relevant trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized, controlled trials comparing the effects of beclamethasone to non-steroidal medication (placebo or non-steroidal therapy) on the linear growth of children with asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data related to the clinical outcome "change in growth" were extracted by two reviewers working independently

MAIN RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-nine citations were identified by the search strategy and bibliography review. Three studies met the inclusion criteria. All used beclomethasone 200 mcg twice daily delivered by dry powder Diskhaler to treat children with mild-moderate asthma. Study duration was 7-12 months. In all three studies, a significant decrease in linear growth occurred in children treated with beclomethasone compared to those receiving placebo or non-steroidal asthma therapy. The average decrease, calculated through meta-analysis, was -1.54 cm per year (95% CI -1.15, -1.94).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

In children with mild-moderate asthma, beclomethasone 200 mcg twice daily caused a decrease in linear growth of -1.54 cm per year. These studies lasted a maximum of 54 weeks, so it remains unclear whether the decrease in growth is sustained or whether it reverses with 'catch up' after therapy is discontinued. We are unable to comment on growth effects of other inhaled steroids that have potentially less systemic effects. If inhaled steroids are required to control a child's asthma, we recommend using the minimum dose that effectively controls the child's asthma and closely following growth.

Dose-ranging study of a new steroid for asthma: mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler

A new formulation of mometasone furoate (MF) for administration by dry powder inhaler (DPI) was evaluated for the treatment of asthma. A 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-ranging study compared the efficacy and safety of three doses of MF DPI (100, 200 and 400 mcg b.i.d) with beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 168 mcg b.i.d. administered by metered dose inhaler in 365 adult or adolescent patients being treated with inhaled glucocorticoids. The mean change from baseline to endpoint (last treatment visit) for forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) was the primary efficacy variable. Secondary efficacy variables included other objective measures of pulmonary function [forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory flow 25-75% (FEV25-75%.) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR)] as well as subjective measures of therapeutic response (patients' daily evaluation of asthma symptoms and physicians' evaluation). At endpoint, all four active treatments were significantly more effective than placebo (P < 0.01) in improving FEV1 (MF DPI 5 to 7%, BDP 3%, placebo -6.6%) and all other measures of pulmonary function (FVC: MF DPI 4 to 5%, BDP 2%, placebo -4.7%; FEF25-75%: MF DPI 6 to 18%, BDP 7.5%, placebo -9.5%; PEFR (AM): MF DPI 5 to 10%, BDP 5.7%, placebo -7%). A consistent trend was observed for better improvement in patients treated with MF DPI 200 mcg b.i.d. than with MF DPI 100 mcg b.i.d., with no apparent additional benefit of MF DPI 400 mcg b.i.d. Results for the MF DPI 100 mcg b.i.d. and BDP 168 mcg b.i.d. treatment groups were similar. Patients' and physicians' subjective evaluations of symptoms found similar improvement in the MF DPI 200 and 400 mcg b.i.d. treatment groups, which were slightly better than that in the MF DPI 100 mcg b.i.d. group. Symptoms tended to worsen in the placebo group. MF DPI was well tolerated at all dose levels and the most frequently reported treatment-related adverse effects were headache, pharyngitis and oral candidiasis. No evidence of HPA-axis suppression was detected in any treatment group. In summary, all doses of MF DPI were well tolerated and significantly improved lung function and MF DPI 400 mcg (200 mcg b.i.d.) was the optimal dose in this study of patients with moderate persistent asthma.

Time to onset of effect of fluticasone propionate in patients with asthma

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of inhaled glucocorticoids in the treatment of asthma is well documented; however, times to onset and maximal treatment effects of these agents have been poorly described.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the time to onset of effect and the time to the best observed effect of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) in patients with asthma.

METHODS

Data from 8 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials of at least 8 weeks' duration were analyzed. Corticosteroid-naive patients (n = 1461) were treated with either FP (25 micrograms to 500 micrograms) or placebo twice daily. Efficacy evaluations included morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptom scores, supplemental albuterol use, and FEV1.

RESULTS

Statistically significant improvements in PEF, asthma symptom scores, and supplemental albuterol use were observed beginning on day 1 of treatment in the FP group versus the placebo group (P <.001); significant increases in FEV1 were observed at the first measurement at week 1 (P <.001). The best observed effect occurred within 3 weeks of the start of FP treatment for PEF (+36 L/min) and FEV1 (+0.52 L) and within 2 weeks for reduction in supplemental albuterol use and asthma symptom scores. Patients with the most severe airflow obstruction had the greatest change in PEF (+56 L/min) and fastest time to 50% of best observed effect (3 days) compared with patients with mild or moderate airflow obstruction; however, time to best observed effect was similar in the 3 groups (20 to 27 days).

CONCLUSION

In patients with asthma, the onset of significant benefit of FP on PEF, symptoms, and rescue albuterol use occurred within 1 day of the start of therapy. FEV1 improved within 1 week of the start of therapy (the first measurement after randomization). There was no effect of sex, age, or dose of FP on the time to response. The best observed response in PEF varies with the degree of baseline airflow obstruction; however, the degree of airflow obstruction has no effect on the time to best observed response.

Inhaled fluticasone propionate: a review of its therapeutic efficacy at dosages < or = 500 microg/day in adults and adolescents with mild to moderate asthma

Fluticasone propionate is a corticosteroid with comparatively high receptor affinity and topical activity. Inhaled fluticasone propionate < or =500 microg/day provided effective corticosteroid maintenance treatment in patients with mild to moderate asthma in randomised, controlled clinical studies of 4 to 24 weeks in duration. Dosages of 50 to 250 microg twice daily produced consistent improvement in spirometric measures of lung function, reduced the frequency of as-needed beta2-agonist bronchodilator use, asthma symptom scores and night-time wakenings, and prevented asthma exacerbations compared with placebo. Fluticasone propionate < or =250 microg twice daily provided significantly greater improvements in lung function than nedocromil 4 mg 4 times daily, theophylline (5 to 15 mg/L) or zafirlukast 20 mg twice daily. Health-related quality of life improved significantly with fluticasone propionate 88 microg twice daily, but not zafirlukast 20 mg twice daily or placebo. In comparative trials in which fluticasone propionate was given at half the dosage of beclomethasone dipropionate, budesonide or flunisolide, fluticasone propionate < or =250 microg twice daily produced equivalent or greater improvement in spirometric parameters and equivalent reductions in the use of as-needed beta2-agonists than beclomethasone dipropionate, budesonide or flunisolide. Fluticasone propionate 250 microg twice daily was generally more effective than triamcinolone acetonide 200 microg 4 times daily in two 24-week trials. The combination of inhaled fluticasone propionate < or =250 plus salmeterol < or =50 microg twice daily allowed for the use of lower dosages of the inhaled corticosteroid. The incidence of adverse events in patients receiving inhaled fluticasone propionate 50 to 250 microg twice daily was similar to that in beclomethasone dipropionate 168 to 500 microg twice daily and budesonide 100 to 600 microg twice daily recipients and greater than that in recipients of triamcinolone acetonide 200 microg 4 times daily in comparative trials. The incidence of oral candidiasis was < or =8% in patients treated with fluticasone propionate < or =250 microg twice daily or other agents. There was no evidence of clinically significant hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis suppression with fluticasone propionate < or =250 microg twice daily in comparative trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Inhaled fluticasone propionate < or =500 microg/day is an effective antiinflammatory therapy for mild to moderate asthma in adolescents and adults. The drug is more effective than nedocromil, theophylline or zafirlukast and is at least as effective as other inhaled corticosteroids administered at twice the fluticasone propionate dosage. The addition of inhaled salmeterol allows the use of lower maintenance dosages of fluticasone propionate. The drug is well tolerated and there is no evidence of a clinically significant effect of this dosage on HPA axis function. Hence, fluticasone propionate < or =500 microg/day is a particularly suitable agent for patients with mild to moderate asthma.

Effect of inhaled corticosteroids on bronchial responsiveness in patients with "corticosteroid naive" mild asthma: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids are the most efficacious anti-inflammatory drugs in asthma. International guidelines also advocate the early introduction of inhaled corticosteroids in corticosteroid naive patients. A study was undertaken to assess the effects of inhaled corticosteroids on bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with corticosteroid naive asthma by conventional meta-analysis.

METHODS

A Medline search of papers published between January 1966 and June 1998 was performed and 11 papers were selected in which the patients had no history of treatment with inhaled or oral corticosteroids. Bronchial responsiveness to bronchoconstricting agents was considered as the main outcome parameter. Doubling doses (DD) of histamine or methacholine were calculated.

RESULTS

The total effect size of inhaled corticosteroids (average daily dose 1000 microg) versus placebo in the 11 studies was +1.16 DD (95% confidence interval (CI) +0.76 to +1.57). When only the eight short term studies (2-8 weeks) were analysed the effect size of the bronchoconstricting agent was +0.91 DD (95% CI +0.65 to +1.16). No relationship was found between the dose of inhaled corticosteroid used and the effect on bronchial responsiveness.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis in patients with corticosteroid naive asthma indicates that, on average, high doses of inhaled corticosteroids decrease bronchial hyperresponsiveness in 2-8 weeks. It remains unclear whether there is a dose-response relationship between inhaled corticosteroids and effect on bronchial hyperresponsiveness.

Inhaled salmeterol and fluticasone: a study comparing monotherapy and combination therapy in asthma

BACKGROUND

The current stepwise approach to pharmacotherapy in the treatment of asthma includes the initiation of an inhaled corticosteroid with the addition of a long-acting inhaled bronchodilator if low dose inhaled corticosteroid fails to control asthma symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether initiation of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate treatment together improves asthma control greater than initiation of monotherapy with the individual agents alone with no additional safety risk in patients with asthma who had not previously been treated with inhaled corticosteroids.

METHODS

A total of 136 male and female patients at least 12 years of age with asthma [forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV) between 50% and 80% of predicted] were randomized to twice daily salmeterol 42 microg, fluticasone propionate 88 microg, fluticasone propionate 220 microg, salmeterol 42 microg plus fluticasone propionate 88 microg, salmeterol 42 microg plus fluticasone propionate 220 microg, or placebo for 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Patients treated with salmeterol combined with fluticasone propionate had improvements over baseline in FEV at endpoint that were at least twice as great (0.6 to 0.7 L) as improvements in patients treated with salmeterol (0.3 L) or fluticasone propionate alone (0.3 L) (P < .05). Patient-rated data (peak expiratory flow, asthma symptom scores, percent of days with no asthma symptoms) confirmed greater (P < .05) mean change from baseline improvements after combined treatment compared with fluticasone propionate alone. No clinically significant differences were noted between treatment groups in any safety measurement.

CONCLUSION

Initiation of maintenance therapy with salmeterol and fluticasone propionate in patients with asthma treated with short-acting beta2-agonists alone provides greater improvements in pulmonary function and symptom control than initiation of maintenance therapy with fluticasone propionate alone.

Diskus and diskhaler: efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate via two dry powder inhalers in subjects with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Fluticasone propionate is a topically active glucocorticoid with potent antiinflammatory activity in the treatment of asthma.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of fluticasone propionate administered via the Diskus and Diskhaler powder delivery devices in subjects with mild-to-moderate asthma.

METHODS

Fluticasone propionate (500 microg twice daily) or placebo was administered via the Diskus and Diskhaler to 213 adolescent and adult asthma subjects in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study for 12 weeks. Subjects were stratified according to baseline therapy of inhaled corticosteroids or beta2-agonists alone. Subjects were dropped from the study if they met predefined criteria for lack of efficacy.

RESULTS

Fluticasone propionate improved pulmonary function both in subjects previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids or beta2-agonists alone. At endpoint, fluticasone propionate significantly improved forced expiratory volume in 1 second (P < .001), morning and evening peak expiratory flow (P < .001), and asthma symptom scores (P < or = .016), and significantly reduced nighttime awakenings (P = .016; Diskhaler group only) and rescue albuterol use (P < .001). Overall, efficacy measurements for the Diskus and Diskhaler were similar. More placebo-treated subjects (34%) withdrew from the study due to lack of efficacy than subjects in the Diskus (5%) or Diskhaler (5%) groups. The incidence and severity of adverse events were similar across groups. Measurement of plasma fluticasone propionate and cortisol concentrations showed no apparent influence of device on systemic exposure.

CONCLUSION

Fluticasone propionate powder, administered via the Diskus or Diskhaler inhalation devices, was well tolerated and effective in the treatment of mild-to-moderate persistent asthma.

Fluticasone propionate powder: oral corticosteroid-sparing effect and improved lung function and quality of life in patients with severe chronic asthma

BACKGROUND

Many patients with severe asthma are dependent on oral corticosteroids for maintenance control of their disease. Treatments that allow patients to be weaned off oral corticosteroids may help to minimize the risk of side effects associated with their chronic use.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated whether inhaled fluticasone propionate powder could maintain pulmonary function while reducing the dose of oral prednisone in patients with chronic, severe asthma.

METHODS

Oral prednisone-dependent (5 to 40 mg/day) adolescents and adults with asthma (n = 111; mean FEV1 = 61% of predicted value) were randomized to placebo or twice daily fluticasone propionate 500 or 1000 microg administered by means of a multidose powder inhaler for 16 weeks in a double-blind, parallel-group study. Patients underwent controlled prednisone reduction on the basis of predetermined asthma stability criteria.

RESULTS

Oral prednisone was eliminated by 75% and 89% of patients in the twice daily 500 and 1000 microg fluticasone propionate groups, respectively, versus 9% of the placebo group (P <.001). FEV1, morning and evening peak expiratory flow, asthma symptoms, albuterol use, and nighttime awakenings improved with fluticasone propionate treatment, achieving statistical significance (P </=.009) primarily in the 1000 microg twice daily group. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression observed at baseline improved when patients were weaned off oral prednisone to fluticasone propionate. Adverse events ascribed to drug treatment were primarily topical effects of inhaled corticosteroids or those associated with prednisone withdrawal. Patient quality of life assessed by means of the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire was clinically and significantly improved after fluticasone propionate treatment (P </=.003).

CONCLUSION

Fluticasone propionate powder (500 or 1000 microg twice daily) effectively improved lung function, adrenal function, and asthma-specific quality of life in patients with severe chronic asthma previously treated with oral prednisone while allowing most patients to be weaned off oral corticosteroid therapy.

Effects of the inhaled corticosteroids fluticasone propionate, triamcinolone acetonide, and flunisolide and oral prednisone on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in adult patients with asthma

Two multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies were conducted in adult patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma to assess the effects of 4 weeks of treatment with inhaled corticosteroids on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function. The first study compared fluticasone propionate 100 and 500 microg twice daily, triamcinolone acetonide 300 and 500 microg twice daily, oral prednisone 10 mg every morning, and placebo. The second study compared fluticasone propionate 100 and 250 microg twice daily, flunisolide 500 microg twice daily, and placebo. Therapeutic doses of fluticasone propionate, triamcinolone acetonide, and flunisolide were found to be comparable to each other and to placebo in their lack of adrenal suppressive effects, based on mean plasma cortisol responses to 6-hour cosyntropin infusion. Prednisone produced significantly greater suppression of HPA-axis function than did any of the inhaled corticosteroids or placebo (P<0.001). Mean reductions from baseline in 8-hour area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and 8-hour peak plasma cortisol concentrations and the mean percentage of change from baseline in 8-hour AUC were significantly greater after treatment with triamcinolone acetonide 500 microg twice daily compared with placebo (P< or =0.042). These findings indicate that fluticasone propionate has no greater systemic effect than either triamcinolone acetonide or flunisolide at doses appropriate for patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma.

Inhaled fluticasone propionate delivered by means of two different multidose powder inhalers is effective and safe in a large pediatric population with persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids are increasingly being used to treat mild-to-moderate asthma in children. However, data regarding therapy with this class of compounds, especially in children under age 6 years, is limited. Fluticasone propionate is a third generation inhaled corticosteroid with an optimal therapeutic index. Few large prospective clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate powder in children.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate powder administered by means of the Diskus and Diskhaler multidose powder inhalers in pediatric patients with persistent asthma.

METHODS

Fluticasone propionate powder (50 microg or 100 microg twice daily) or placebo was administered by means of the Diskus or Diskhaler inhalers to 437 children (4 to 11 years old) with persistent asthma for 12 weeks in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multi-center trial. Patients were stratified according to whether they were receiving prior treatment with inhaled corticosteroids or cromolyn or beta2-agonists alone.

RESULTS

Fluticasone propionate powder administered by means of Diskus or Diskhaler significantly improved FEV1 (mean increase from baseline of 0.22 to 0.24 L; p < or = 0.023), clinic morning peak expiratory flow (mean increase from baseline of 48 to 55 L/min; p < or = 0.006), patient-measured morning (p < or = 0.001) and evening (p < or = 0.003) peak expiratory flow, and asthma symptom scores (in all but the 50 microg Diskus group; p < or = 0.036), as well as reduced albuterol use (p < or = 0.002) and nighttime awakenings (p < or = 0.019) at endpoint. Efficacy parameters were not significantly different between the two doses with either device. More placebo-treated patients discontinued the study because of lack of efficacy than patients in any fluticasone propionate group (p < 0.001). Fluticasone propionate did not suppress morning plasma cortisol concentrations and did not affect 24-hour urinary free-cortisol excretion. Adverse events were primarily pharmacologic effects of inhaled corticosteroids, and those related to the study drug occurred with low frequency. Patient satisfaction with both the Diskus and Diskhaler devices was high, with a majority of patients (> 80%) rating them favorably.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that fluticasone propionate powder, at the conventional recommended doses of up to 200 microg/day administered by means of Diskus or Diskhaler, was well tolerated and improved lung function in children even as young as 4 and 5 years old regardless of whether they were previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids or cromolyn or beta2-agonists alone.

Dose-related response to inhaled fluticasone propionate in patients with methacholine-induced bronchial hyperresponsiveness: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Dose-response relationships with inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of asthma have been difficult to establish. A multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of low doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) in patients with mild to moderate asthma. Methacholine challenge testing was conducted in addition to measurement of traditional efficacy variables. After a single-blind screening period, 138 patients > or = 12 years of age were randomly assigned to receive placebo, FP 50 microg, or FP 100 microg, twice daily for 8 weeks. The results of methacholine challenge testing averaged over all visits favored FP 200 microg/day over placebo and FP 100 microg/day (p < 0.05); there were no significant differences between placebo and FP 100 microg/day. Mean changes from baseline to endpoint favored each dose of FP over placebo based on forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), patient-measured peak expiratory flow (PEF), total symptom scores, and rescue bronchodilator use (p < 0.05); there were no differences in these parameters between the two doses of FP. The addition of methacholine challenge testing allowed definition of a dose-response relationship that was not apparent with traditional efficacy variables.

Fluticasone propionate powder administered through Diskhaler versus triamcinolone acetonide aerosol administered through metered-dose inhaler in patients with persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Attempts to delineate efficacy and safety differences among inhaled corticosteroids have been difficult because of the lack of well-controlled, comparative studies reported in the medical literature.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study was conducted in 24 outpatient centers. A total of 291 male and female patients at least 12 years of age with asthma (FEV1 between 50% and 80% of predicted value), who had previously received maintenance therapy with beclomethasone dipropionate or triamcinolone acetonide, were switched to treatment with fluticasone propionate powder (250 microg twice daily), triamcinolone acetonide aerosol (200 microg four times daily), or placebo for 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Mean increase in FEV1 from baseline to end point was significantly (p = 0.009) greater in patients switched to treatment with fluticasone compared with patients switched to treatment with triamcinolone (0.27 L and 0.07 L, respectively). At end point, mean increase in morning peak expiratory flow from baseline was 21 L/min with fluticasone compared with mean decreases of 6 L/min and 28 L/min with triamcinolone and placebo, respectively (p < 0.001 vs triamcinolone and placebo). Supplemental rescue albuterol use decreased by 30% from baseline with fluticasone (p < 0.05 vs triamcinolone and placebo) compared with triamcinolone (6%) or placebo (increased by 50%). The percentage of patients withdrawn from the study because they met predefined lack-of-efficacy criteria was higher with placebo (60%) and triamcinolone (27%) than with fluticasone (17%). Incidence of adverse events and low morning plasma cortisol concentrations were similar across treatment groups except for oral candidiasis (p = 0.035, fluticasone vs placebo).

CONCLUSION

Fluticasone propionate powder twice daily (500 microg/day) was superior in efficacy to triamcinolone acetonide aerosol four times daily (800 microg/day) in patients with persistent asthma.