1
|
Zang Y, Qiu Y, Sun Y, Fan Y. Baseline functioning scales of EORTC QLQ-C30 predict overall survival in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a meta-analysis. Qual Life Res 2024; 33:1455-1468. [PMID: 38227073 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03591-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE A consensus has not been reached on the value of quality of life (QoL) as a prognostic factor for survival in gastrointestinal cancer. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the association between functioning scales of the EORTC QoL Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and the overall survival (OS) in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases, until February 7, 2023. The studies included were those that investigated the association between baseline QoL measured by the functioning scales of EORTC QLQ-C30 and OS in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. The prognostic capacity of QoL was calculated by pooling the adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS Twenty-four studies' analyses reported by 22 eligible articles involving 11,609 patients were included. When compared with good parameters of QoL, poor global QoL (HR 1.81; 95% CI 1.53-2.13), physical functioning (HR 1.51; 95% CI 1.31-1.74), social functioning (HR 1.67; 95% CI 1.30-2.15), and role functioning scale (HR 1.42; 95% CI 1.20-1.29) were significantly associated with decreased OS. For each 10-point increase in QLQ-C30 parameters, the pooled HR of OS was 0.87 (95% CI 0.83-0.92) for global QoL, 0.87 (95% CI 0.83-0.92) for physical functioning, and 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.97) for role functioning. However, each 10-point increase in social, emotional, or cognitive functioning scale did not significantly predict OS. CONCLUSIONS Baseline health-related QoL defined by the physical functioning or global QoL scale of EORTC QLQ-C30 significantly predicts OS in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ye Zang
- Department of Oncology, The People's Hospital of Danyang, Affiliated Danyang Hospital of Nantong University, Danyang, 212399, China
| | - Yue Qiu
- Cancer Institute, The Affiliated People's Hospital, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212002, China
| | - Yimeng Sun
- Cancer Institute, The Affiliated People's Hospital, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212002, China.
- Institute of Molecular Biology & Translational Medicine, The Affiliated People's Hospital, Jiangsu University, No. 8 Dianli Road, Zhenjiang, 212002, Jiangsu, China.
| | - Yu Fan
- Cancer Institute, The Affiliated People's Hospital, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212002, China.
- Institute of Molecular Biology & Translational Medicine, The Affiliated People's Hospital, Jiangsu University, No. 8 Dianli Road, Zhenjiang, 212002, Jiangsu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Smedman TM, Guren TK, Tveit KM, Thomsen M, Andersen MH, Line PD, Dueland S. Health-Related Quality of Life in Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With Liver Transplantation Compared to Chemotherapy. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10404. [PMID: 35707633 PMCID: PMC9189292 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) for patients with non-resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) offers improved survival and has gained increased interest internationally the last years. The aim of this study was to describe the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with non-resectable CRLM receiving LT and how baseline HRQoL factors affect overall survival (OS). HRQoL data in the SECA (SEcondary CAncer) LT cohort was compared to data obtained from colorectal cancer patients starting first-line chemotherapy for metastatic disease in a clinical trial and data from a Norwegian normal population. HRQoL data from the QLQ-C30 questionnaire used in the SECA LT study and the NORDIC- VII study were reported. The relationship between patient-reported symptom burden at baseline and OS was investigated. In the SECA study longitudinal HRQoL assessment was used to describe the time until definitive deterioration as well as mean values at different time points. Patients in the SECA and NORDIC-VII studies reported similar baseline HRQoL. The median time until definitive deterioration in the transplanted patients was estimated to 36 months. In the SECA study appetite loss and pain at baseline had negative impact on OS (25.3 versus 71.7 months, p = 0.002 and 39.7 versus 71.7 months, p = 0.038, respectively). Despite a relapse in most of the LT patients the Global Health Score (GHS) remained good. Pain, and especially appetite loss at time of transplantation is associated with poor outcome after LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tor Magnus Smedman
- Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- *Correspondence: Tor Magnus Smedman,
| | | | | | | | | | - Pål-Dag Line
- Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Morishima T, Sato A, Nakata K, Matsumoto Y, Koeda N, Shimada H, Maruhama T, Matsuki D, Miyashiro I. Barthel Index-based functional status as a prognostic factor in young and middle-aged adults with newly diagnosed gastric, colorectal and lung cancer: a multicentre retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e046681. [PMID: 33853804 PMCID: PMC8054075 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Functional status assessments of activities of daily living may improve prognostic precision during initial diagnostic evaluations in young and middle-aged adults with cancer. However, the association between pretreatment functional status and survival in these patients is poorly understood. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of functional status in young and middle-aged patients with cancer. DESIGN Multicentre retrospective cohort study. SETTING We used a cancer registry from Osaka Prefecture, Japan. The data were linked to administrative claims data from 35 hospitals in the same prefecture. PARTICIPANTS Patients aged 18-69 years who received new diagnoses of gastric, colorectal or lung cancer between 2010 and 2014. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Cox proportional hazards models of 5-year all-cause mortality were developed to examine the prognostic impact of pretreatment functional status, which was categorised into three levels of functional disability (none, moderate and severe) based on Barthel Index scores. The models controlled for age, sex, comorbidities, cancer stage and tumour histology. RESULTS We analysed 12 134 patients. Higher mortality risks were significantly associated with moderate functional disability (adjusted HR 1.44 (95% CI 1.18 to 1.75), 1.35 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.68) and 1.74 (95% CI 1.50 to 2.03) in patients with gastric, colorectal and lung cancer, respectively) and severe functional disability (adjusted HR 3.56 (95% CI 2.81 to 4.51), 2.37 (95% CI 1.89 to 2.95) and 2.34 (95% CI 2.00 to 2.75) in patients with gastric, colorectal and lung cancer, respectively). CONCLUSION Accounting for functional status at cancer diagnosis may improve the prediction of survival time in young and middle-aged adults with cancer. Functional status has potential applications in survival predictions and risk adjustments when analysing outcomes in patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Akira Sato
- Cancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kayo Nakata
- Cancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | | | | | - Hiroko Shimada
- National Hospital Organization Osaka Minami Medical Center, Kawachinagano, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Maruhama
- Department of Health Information Management, Higashisumiyoshi Morimoto Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Isao Miyashiro
- Cancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Patient-reported outcomes as predictors of survival in patients with bowel cancer: a systematic review. Qual Life Res 2019; 28:2871-2887. [DOI: 10.1007/s11136-019-02255-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
5
|
Breadner D, Vincent MD, Jonker D, Cripps C, Klimo P, Biagi J, Lam W, O'Connell A, Whiston F, Stitt L, Welch S. Health related quality of life in older or frail patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with dose reduced capecitabine. J Geriatr Oncol 2018; 9:659-664. [PMID: 29728308 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2017] [Revised: 03/02/2018] [Accepted: 04/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Palliative chemotherapy's role is to prolong survival while minimizing treatment toxicities to preserve or improve quality of life. We have recently published a phase II trial of dose reduced capecitabine in older or frail patients with advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC). We herein provide a robust analysis of the health related quality of life (HRQoL) data from our trial. METHODS A single arm multi-centered phase II trial of dose reduced capecitabine (1500 or 2000 mg/m2 days one-fourteen q21 days) in older or frail patients. Participants (182 patients) were asked to complete Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy general questionnaire (FACT-G) at enrollment, after each cycle of capecitabine, and once upon completion, if possible. RESULTS 157 patients completed a baseline questionnaire (86%), and 137 patients (75%) completed at least one subsequent questionnaire. The mean baseline score was 81.6, out of a possible 108. The mean score peaked at 92 after cycle 10. The mean change from baseline was always positive. Patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) ranged from 30% to 45% during treatment. Higher baseline FACT-G and Physical Well-being score were independently prognostic for improved survival (p = 0.006 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Time until definitive deterioration (TUDD) was insignificantly longer in patients with a higher baseline FACT-G (p = 0.18). CONCLUSION Baseline HRQoL scores were independently prognostic for survival, supporting their importance. Compared to full dose, reduced dose capecitabine has previously demonstrated equivalent efficacy and reduced toxicity. We have reported dose reduced capecitabine improves quality of life in older or frail patients with aCRC, further supporting its use in the management of aCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Breadner
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario, Canada; Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Mark David Vincent
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario, Canada; Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Derek Jonker
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christine Cripps
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul Klimo
- Medical Oncology, Lions Gate Hospital, North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - James Biagi
- Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wendy Lam
- Burnaby Hospital Cancer Centre, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | - Larry Stitt
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephen Welch
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario, Canada; Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gong J, Wu D, Chuang J, Tuli R, Simard J, Hendifar A. Moving Beyond Conventional Clinical Trial End Points in Treatment-refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Composite Quality-of-life and Symptom Control End Point. Clin Ther 2017; 39:2135-2145. [PMID: 29079389 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2017] [Revised: 09/29/2017] [Accepted: 09/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This review highlights the evidence supporting symptom control and quality-of-life (QOL) measures as predictors of survival in treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and describes a composite symptom control and QOL end point recently reported in a Phase III trial that may serve as a more reasonable end point of efficacy in this population. METHODS A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE to identify clinical studies (including case series and observational, retrospective, and prospective studies) that reported the predictive value of QOL measures for survival in mCRC. The search was limited by the following key words: quality of life, survival, and colorectal cancer. We then performed a second search limited to studies of randomized and Phase III design in mCRC to identify studies that used QOL assessments as their primary end points. A manual search was also performed to include additional studies of potential relevance. FINDINGS There is increasing evidence to support that symptom control and QOL measures are predictors of survival in treatment-refractory mCRC and can serve as an alternative but equally as important end point to survival in this population. A recent large, randomized Phase III trial using a composite primary end point of lean body mass, pain, anorexia, and fatigue reported the feasibility in evaluating benefit in mCRC beyond conventional clinical trial end points. IMPLICATIONS Future studies in treatment-refractory mCRC may be better served by evaluating improvement in symptom control and QOL, which may otherwise serve as the best predictor of survival in last-line treatment settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Gong
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Daniel Wu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
| | - Jeremy Chuang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
| | - Richard Tuli
- Gastrointestinal and Neuroendocrine Malignancies, Samuel Oschin Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Andrew Hendifar
- Gastrointestinal and Neuroendocrine Malignancies, Samuel Oschin Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bonnetain F, Borg C, Adams RR, Ajani JA, Benson A, Bleiberg H, Chibaudel B, Diaz-Rubio E, Douillard JY, Fuchs CS, Giantonio BJ, Goldberg R, Heinemann V, Koopman M, Labianca R, Larsen AK, Maughan T, Mitchell E, Peeters M, Punt CJA, Schmoll HJ, Tournigand C, de Gramont A. How health-related quality of life assessment should be used in advanced colorectal cancer clinical trials. Ann Oncol 2017; 28:2077-2085. [PMID: 28430862 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Traditionally, the efficacy of cancer treatment in patients with advance or metastatic disease in clinical studies has been studied using overall survival and more recently tumor-based end points such as progression-free survival, measurements of response to treatment. However, these seem not to be the relevant clinical end points in current situation if such end points were no validated as surrogate of overall survival to demonstrate the clinical efficacy. Appropriate, meaningful, primary patient-oriented and patient-reported end points that adequately measure the effects of new therapeutic interventions are then crucial for the advancement of clinical research in metastatic colorectal cancer to complement the results of tumor-based end points. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is effectively an evaluation of quality of life and its relationship with health over time. HRQoL includes the patient report at least of the way a disease or its treatment affects its physical, emotional and social well-being. Over the past few years, several phase III trials in a variety of solid cancers have assessed the incremental value of HRQoL in addition to the traditional end points of tumor response and survival results. HRQoL could provide not only complementary clinical data to the primary outcomes, but also more precise predictive and prognostic value. This end point is useful for both clinicians and patients in order to achieve the dogma of precision medicine. The present article examines the use of HRQoL in phase III metastatic colorectal cancer clinical trials, outlines the importance of HRQoL assessment methods, analysis, and results presentation. Moreover, it discusses the relevance of including HRQoL as a primary/co-primary end point to support the progression-free survival results and to assess efficacy of treatment in the advanced disease setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Bonnetain
- Methodology and Quality of Life Unit, Oncology Department (INSERM UMR 1098), Quality of Life and Cancer Clinical Research Platform
| | - C Borg
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon
- Centre d'Investigation Clinique en Biothérapie, CIC-1431, Nantes
- 11UMR1098 INSERM/Université de Franche Comté/Etablissement Français du Sang, Besançon
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - R R Adams
- Cardiff University and Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - J A Ajani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - A Benson
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Northwestern Medical Group, Chicago, USA
| | - H Bleiberg
- Montagne de Saint Job, Brussels, Belgium
| | - B Chibaudel
- Institut Hospitalier Franco-Britannique, Levallois-Perret, France
| | - E Diaz-Rubio
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Y Douillard
- Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO), Nantes St-Herblain, France
| | - C S Fuchs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - B J Giantonio
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - R Goldberg
- Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center-James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, USA
| | - V Heinemann
- Department of Internal Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R Labianca
- Cancer Center, Ospedale Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - A K Larsen
- Cancer Biology and Therapeutics, INSERM and Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
| | - T Maughan
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Gray Laboratories, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - E Mitchell
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA
| | - M Peeters
- Department of Oncology, Center for Oncological Research Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - C J A Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H J Schmoll
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, University Clinic Halle, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - C Tournigand
- Department of Oncology, University of Paris Est Creteil; APHP, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - A de Gramont
- Institut Hospitalier Franco-Britannique, Levallois-Perret, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hsu T, Speers CH, Kennecke HF, Cheung WY. The utility of abbreviated patient-reported outcomes for predicting survival in early stage colorectal cancer. Cancer 2017; 123:1839-1847. [PMID: 28081292 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2016] [Revised: 11/11/2016] [Accepted: 11/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly used in clinical settings. Prior research suggests that PROs collected at baseline may be associated with cancer survival, but most of those studies were conducted in patients with breast or lung cancer. The objective of this study was to determine the correlation between prospectively collected PROs and cancer-specific outcomes in patients with early stage colorectal cancer. METHODS Patients who had newly diagnosed stage II or III colorectal cancer from 2009 to 2010 and had a consultation at the British Columbia Cancer Agency completed the brief Psychosocial Screen for Cancer (PSSCAN) questionnaire, which collects data on patients' perceived social supports, quality of life (QOL), anxiety and depression, and general health. PROs from the PSSCAN were linked with the Gastrointestinal Cancers Outcomes Database, which contains information on patient and tumor characteristics, treatment details, and cancer outcomes. Cox regression models were constructed for overall survival (OS), and Fine and Gray regression models were developed for disease-specific survival (DSS). RESULTS In total, 692 patients were included. The median patient age was 67 years (range, 26-95 years), and the majority had colon cancer (61%), were diagnosed with stage III disease (54%), and received chemotherapy (58%). In general, patients felt well supported and reported good overall health and QOL. On multivariate analysis, increased fatigue was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.99; P = .00007) and DSS (HR, 1.63; P = .03), as was lack of emotional support (OS: HR, 4.36; P = .0003; DSS: HR, 1.92; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS Although most patients described good overall health and QOL and indicated that they were generally well supported, patients who experienced more pronounced fatigue or lacked emotional support had a higher likelihood of worse OS and DSS. These findings suggest that abbreviated PROs can inform and assist clinicians to identify patients who have a worse prognosis and may need more vigilant follow-up. Cancer 2017;123:1839-1847. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina Hsu
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Caroline H Speers
- Division of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Hagen F Kennecke
- Division of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Winson Y Cheung
- Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wong CKH, Law WL, Wan YF, Poon JTC, Lam CLK. Health-related quality of life and risk of colorectal cancer recurrence and All-cause death among advanced stages of colorectal cancer 1-year after diagnosis. BMC Cancer 2014; 14:337. [PMID: 24886385 PMCID: PMC4030731 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2013] [Accepted: 05/12/2014] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The study aimed to examine the association between health-related quality of life (HRQOL) assessed with overall survival (OS) and recurrence after diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods Overall 160 patients with advanced stage CRC were recruited in an observational study and completed the generic and condition-specific HRQOL questionnaires at the colorectal specialist outpatient clinic in Hong Kong, between 10/2009 and 07/2010. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics including duration since diagnosis, primary tumor location and treatment modality, were collected to serve as predictor variables in regression models. All-cause death or CRC recurrence was the event of interest. Association between HRQOL with OS was assessed using Cox regression. Association between HRQOL and CRC recurrence was further modeled by competing-risks regression adjusted for the competing-risks of death from any cause. Results After a median follow-up of 23 months, there were 22 (16.1%) incidents of CRC recurrence and 15 (9.4%) deaths. Decreased physical functioning (hazard ratios, HR = 0.917, 95% CI:0.889-0.981) and general health of domains in SF-12 (HR = 0.846, 95% CI:0.746-0.958) or SF-6D scores (HR = 0.010, 95% CI:0.000-0.573) were associated with an increased risk of death, with adjustment of patients’ characteristics. Increased vitality (HR = 1.151, 95% CI:1.027-1.289) and mental health (HR = 1.128, 95% CI:1.005-1.265) were associated with an increased likelihood of death. In models adjusted for competing-risk of death, those with worse HRQOL was not associated with increased risk of CRC recurrence. Conclusions Although self-reported HRQOL was not a significant prognostic factor for CRC recurrence, the HRQOL provided independent prognostic value about mortality in patients with advanced stage of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos K H Wong
- Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, The University of Hong Kong, 3/F, Ap Lei Chau Clinic, 161 Ap Lei Chau Main Street, Ap Lei Chau, Hong Kong.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|