Progestins in breast cancer treatment. A review

High Levels of Progesterone Receptor B in MCF-7 Cells Enable Radical Anti-Tumoral and Anti-Estrogenic Effect of Progestin

The widely reported conflicting effects of progestin on breast cancer suggest that the progesterone receptor (PR) has dual functions depending on the cellular context. Cell models that enable PR to fully express anti-tumoral properties are valuable for the understanding of molecular determinant(s) of the anti-tumoral property. This study evaluated whether the expression of high levels of PR in MCF-7 cells enabled a strong anti-tumoral response to progestin. MCF-7 cells were engineered to overexpress PRB by stable transfection. A single dose of Promegestone (R5020) induced an irreversible cell growth arrest and senescence-associated secretory phenotype in MCF-7 cells with PRB overexpression (MCF-7PRB cells) but had no effect on MCF-7 cells with PRA overexpression. The growth-arresting effect was associated with downregulations of cyclin A2 and B1, CDK2, and CDK4 despite an initial upregulation of cyclin A2 and B1. R5020 also induced an evident activation of Nuclear Factor κB (NF-κB) and upregulation of interleukins IL-1α, IL-1β, and IL-8. Although R5020 caused a significant increase of CD24+CD44+ cell population, R5020-treated MCF-7PRB cells were unable to form tumorspheres and underwent massive apoptosis, which is paradoxically associated with marked downregulations of the pro-apoptotic proteins BID, BAX, PARP, and Caspases 7 and 8, as well as diminution of anti-apoptotic protein BCL-2. Importantly, R5020-activated PRB abolished the effect of estrogen. This intense anti-estrogenic effect was mediated by marked downregulation of ERα and pioneer factor FOXA1, leading to diminished chromatin-associated ERα and FOXA1 and estrogen-induced target gene expression. In conclusion, high levels of agonist-activated PRB in breast cancer cells can be strongly anti-tumoral and anti-estrogenic despite the initial unproductive cell cycle acceleration. Repression of ERα and FOXA1 expression is a major mechanism for the strong anti-estrogenic effect.

Leveraging Antiprogestins in the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer

Although incurable, the prognosis for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has considerably improved with the approvals of multiple targeted and cytotoxic therapies. For hormone receptor-positive (HR+), ie, estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor positive (ER+/PgR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (ie, ERBB2 gene nonamplified or HER2-) MBC, current approved treatment options include palliative endocrine therapy (ET), cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK 4/6) inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors, and PI3 kinase inhibitors. Most treatments target ER+ disease regardless of PgR status. Although the presence of PgR is crucial for ER+ cell proliferation in both normal and malignant mammary tissue, currently, there are no approved treatments that specifically target PgR. Recent literature has demonstrated the potential of antiprogestins in the treatment of MBC both in preclinical and clinical studies. Antiprogestins, including selective PgR modulators (SPRMs) that act as PgR antagonists, are a promising class of therapeutics for overcoming endocrine resistance in patients who develop activating estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) gene mutations after prior endocrine therapy. Herein, we summarize the role of PgR and antiprogestins in the treatment of MBC. Other aspects on the use of functional imaging, clinical trials incorporating novel antiprogestins, and potential treatment combinations to overcome endocrine resistance will be briefly discussed.

Endocrine therapy for advanced/metastatic breast cancer

First-line endocrine therapy by estrogen antagonism or suppression of estrogen achieves objective responses (ORs) and clinical benefit (CB) in around 30% and 50% of estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients, respectively. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are the most effective treatment in previously untreated postmenopausal women. Tamoxifen is an effective alternative. The optimal endocrine therapy on relapse remains uncertain. Tamoxifen and fulvestrant achieve CB in around 50% of patients and ORs of 10%. CB of exemestane after nonsteroidal AIs is 30% to 50% but ORs are rare. Targeted agents (eg, everolimus) plus endocrine therapy are likely to become increasingly important in overcoming endocrine resistance.

A new approach to construct a fused 2-ylidene chromene ring: highly regioselective synthesis of novel chromeno quinoxalines

Regioselective construction of a fused 2-ylidene chromene ring was achieved for the first time by using AlCl(3)-induced C-C bond formation followed by Pd/C-Cu mediate coupling-cyclization strategy. A number of chromeno[4,3-b]quinoxaline derivatives were prepared by using this strategy. Single crystal X-ray diffraction study of a representative compound e.g. 6-(2,2-dimethylpropylidene)-4-methyl-6H-chromeno[4,3-b]quinoxalin-3-ol confirmed the presence of an exocyclic C-C double bond with Z-geometry. The crystal structure analysis and hydrogen bonding patterns of the same compound along with its structure elaboration via propargylation followed by Sonogashira coupling of the resulting terminal alkyne is presented. A probable mechanism for the formation of 2-ylidene chromene ring is discussed. Some of the compounds synthesized showed anticancer properties when tested in vitro.

Evaluation of plasma and tissue estrogen suppression with third-generation aromatase inhibitors: of relevance to clinical understanding?

Development of aromatase inhibition and aromatase inhibitors as a therapeutic strategy was initiated through two different pathways. The one pathway went through systematic exploration of aromatase substrate analogues for enzyme inhibitions, subsequently leading to the development of steroidal agents for clinical use. The second involved clinical observation with an unsuccessful anti-epileptic compound named aminoglutethimide, attempting to achieve a "medical adrenalectomy". Endocrine studies on patients treated with aminoglutethimide lead to direct assessment of in vivo aromatase inhibition in patients on treatment, thus identifying a novel therapeutic strategy. As such, both research programs represent different examples of pioneering translational work leading towards a successful therapeutic strategy. Subsequent studies with respect to total aromatase inhibition have led to successful development of more potent strategies. Most importantly, these studies have revealed a correlation between aromatase inhibition and clinical outcome. Ongoing studies exploring tissue estrogen levels as well as gene expression profiles on therapy may further improve this important therapeutic area.

Additive endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer - back to the future

While novel endocrine treatment options have been implemented in the advanced - as well as adjuvant setting, recent results suggest a place for "old-fashioned" additive treatment with estrogens in advanced breast cancer. This paper reviews the biological rationale for endocrine therapy in general and additive treatment with estrogens in particular. The finding that patients becoming resistant to treatment with aromatase inhibitors may subsequently respond to estrogen therapy adds important information to our understanding of therapy resistance in general. Moreover, the return of a therapeutic option abandoned more than 20 years ago, now to be used in a different sequential setting, suggests a critical examination whether there may be other conventional treatment options still earning a place as treatment in advanced disease as well. While ablative therapies including surgical oophorectomy, hypophysectomy and adrenalectomy are not candidate treatment options due to morbidity, there are additive treatment options apart from estrogen therapy that may be considered. Androgens administered at therapeutic doses are not feasible for toxicity reasons; yet, the potential of adding androgens in small doses as adjuvant to aromatase inhibitors should be further explored. Whether patients become resistant to other treatment options may still benefit from megestrol acetate, remains to be explored.

Emerging drugs in metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women and comprises 26% of all cancers diagnosed in women in the United States. Among presenting patients, 3 - 6% already have metastatic disease, and 50 - 70% of the remaining patients develop systemic relapse. Recently many new drugs, particularly molecular targeted therapies, have been developed in the field.

OBJECTIVE

To review the current and emerging data on the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, with emphasis on novel therapies that show promise.

METHODS

PubMed and ASCO annual meeting abstracts were used for a literature search.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

Despite improved response rates, conventional treatments still result only in transient remission in most cases. New therapeutic alternatives and new strategies to overcome drug resistance are needed to improve these results.

Lack of complete cross-resistance between different aromatase inhibitors; a real finding in search for an explanation?

While third-generation aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane) are successfully implemented as adjuvant and first-line therapy for hormone-sensitive breast cancer in postmenopausal women, important questions remain to be addressed. An issue of particular interest is the question about lack of complete cross-resistance between steroidal and non-steroidal compounds. Although the studies reporting this phenomenon in general contain a small number of patients, the findings across the different reports seem consistent. While several potential mechanisms have been suggested, so far we lack scientific proof what mechanisms may be responsible for this finding. Finally, we do not know whether lack of cross-resistance actually signals an improved efficacy for certain compounds or may be due to alternative mechanisms of action. Neither do we know whether some tumours are more sensitive to particular drugs. This paper summarizes clinical findings up to now with respect to lack of cross-resistance and discuss potential mechanisms involved.

Advances in Endocrine Therapy for Breast Cancer: Considering Efficacy, Safety, and Quality of Life

Breast cancer is the most common cancer found in women in the United States. Endocrine therapy is the standard of care for most women with hormone receptor-positive tumors in adjuvant and metastatic settings. The selective estrogen response modifier tamoxifen has been the standard treatment for postmenopausal patients for many years. Numerous new endocrine therapy agents provide women with novel treatment options, including the nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors anastrozole and letrozole, the steroidal aromatase inhibitor exemestane, and the estrogen receptor antagonist fulvestrant. Clinical trials have begun to define the role of these agents and their unique side-effect profiles. Nurses are vital in supporting patients in the decision-making process, managing side effects of treatment, and making observations to enhance understanding of the patient experience with new treatments. This article will assist nurses in educating patients about endocrine therapy options and their associated potential short- and long-term side effects, as well as treatment demands.

Characterization of a new class of selective nonsteroidal progesterone receptor agonists

The identification of a new series of selective nonsteroidal progesterone receptor (PR) agonists is reported. Using a high-throughput screening assay based on the measurement of transactivation of a mouse mammary tumor virus promoter-driven luciferase reporter (MMTV-Luc) in human breast cancer T47D cells, a benzimidazole-2-thione analog was identified. Compound 1 showed an apparent EC50 of 53 nM and efficacy of 93% with respect to progesterone. It binds to PR with high affinity (Ki nM), but had no or very low affinity for other steroid hormone receptors. Structure-activity relationship studies of a series of benzimidazole-2-thione analogs revealed critical positions for high PR binding affinity and transactivation potency as well as receptor selectivity, as exemplified by 25. Compound 25 binds to human PR with high affinity (Ki nM) and had at least > 1000-fold selectivity for PR versus other steroid receptors. Molecular modeling studies suggested that these agonists overlap favorably with progesterone in the ligand-binding domain of PR. In T47D cells, compound 25 acted as a full agonist in the MMTV-Luc reporter assay, as well as in the induction of endogenous alkaline phosphatase activity with apparent EC50 values of 4 and 9 nM, respectively. In the immature rat model, compound 25 provided a significant suppression of estrogen-induced endometrium hypertrophy as measured by luminal epithelial height. In contrast, compound 25 was inactive in the luteinizing hormone release assay in young ovariectomized rats. These benzimidazole-2-thione analogs constitute a new series of nonsteroidal PR agonists with an excellent steroid receptor selectivity profile. The differential activities observed in the in vivo progestogenic assays in rat models suggest that these analogs can act as selective PR modulators.

Aromatase inhibitors and inactivators for breast cancer therapy

Aromatase inhibitors and inactivators are increasingly important to the therapy of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. These compounds are also currently being evaluated in the adjuvant setting and may have potential in breast cancer prevention. In addition to the recent clinical results, experimental research with development of aromatase 'knockout' mice as well as certain clinical observations in individuals lacking this enzyme have deepened our understanding of estrogens outside of the field of reproduction. Such information should help us to further develop this type of therapy in breast cancer and, in particular, extend our understanding of the lack of complete cross-resistance between aromatase inhibitors and inactivators. Clinically, third-generation aromatase inhibitors and inactivators have shown superiority compared with conventional treatment in advanced postmenopausal breast cancer with respect to second-line (tamoxifen failures) as well as first-line therapy. The fact that tamoxifen is noncurative in metastatic disease but improves long-term survival in the adjuvant setting suggests that even modest improvements in therapy of advanced disease may be translated into survival benefits in patients with early disease. In addition, these novel compounds with lack of complete cross-resistance extend the scope of using sequential treatment options to maximise the duration of optimal endocrine therapy in metastatic breast cancer disease.

Stepwise estrogen suppression manipulating the estrostat

Estrogen suppression is an effective endocrine treatment option in pre- as well as postmenopausal breast cancer patients. The fact that it produces clinical benefits not only in these two groups of patients that differ significantly with respect to plasma estrogen levels but also among patients with very low plasma estrogen levels due to previous hypophysectomy, adrenalectomy or treatment with first/second generation aromatase inhibitors, suggests estrogen deprivation to work independent of pretreatment plasma estrogen levels. Interestingly, in vitro studies have revealed MCF-7 cells to respond to estrogen deprivation by sensitization, causing maximum estradiol stimulation at a concentration 10(-5) to 10(-4) the concentration needed in wild-type cells. While results from recent phase III studies comparing novel aromatase inhibitors and inactivators to conventional therapy have suggested that a more effective hormone ablation may be translated into an improved clinical efficacy, the biochemical rationale for lack of complete cross-resistance between aromatase inhibitors and inactivators or aromatase inhibitors and megestrol acetate remains to be explained. Interestingly, patients becoming resistant to estrogen deprivation may still respond to estrogens administered in pharmacological doses. Future studies are warranted to explore alterations in gene expression and signaling mechanisms in response to different therapies in tumor tissue in vivo.

Is there a growing role for endocrine therapy in the treatment of breast cancer?

Novel biochemical findings on the molecular mechanisms of estrogen actions may help us to understand some of the unexplained observations seen in breast cancer treatment and suggest new therapeutic opportunities. Thus, apart from the challenge of improving the clinical treatment of patients with advanced disease, results from trials in this setting may reveal new therapeutic principles that may be evaluated in the adjuvant setting. The role of endocrine therapy in metastatic as well as early breast cancer is increasing, and the possibility of improving cure rates for breast cancer by implementing therapy with novel aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting is exciting. While the results from prevention trials are most interesting, suggesting the possibility of reducing breast cancer incidence in high-risk groups, more data are needed before we can decide whether such interventions are warranted in women at high risk of developing breast cancer.

The novel progesterone receptor antagonists RTI 3021-012 and RTI 3021-022 exhibit complex glucocorticoid receptor antagonist activities: implications for the development of dissociated antiprogestins

We have identified two novel compounds (RTI 3021-012 and RTI 3021-022) that demonstrate similar affinities for human progesterone receptor (PR) and display equivalent antiprogestenic activity. As with most antiprogestins, such as RU486, RTI 3021-012, and RTI 3021-022 also bind to the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) with high affinity. Unexpectedly, when compared with RU486, the RTI antagonists manifest significantly less GR antagonist activity. This finding indicates that, with respect to antiglucocorticoid function, receptor binding affinity is not a good predictor of biological activity. We have determined that the lack of a clear correlation between the GR binding affinity of the RTI compounds and their antagonist activity reflects the unique manner in which they modulate GR signaling. Previously, we proposed a two step "active inhibition" model to explain steroid receptor antagonism: 1) competitive inhibition of agonist binding; and 2) competition of the antagonist bound receptor with that activated by agonists for DNA response elements within target gene promoters. Accordingly, we observed that RU486, RTI 3021-012, and RTI 3021-022, when assayed for PR antagonist activity, accomplished both of these steps. Thus, all three compounds are "active antagonists" of PR function. When assayed on GR, however, RU486 alone functioned as an active antagonist. RTI 3021-012 and RTI 3021-022, on the other hand, functioned solely as "competitive antagonists" since they were capable of high affinity GR binding, but the resulting ligand receptor complex was unable to bind DNA. These results have important pharmaceutical implications supporting the use of mechanism based approaches to identify nuclear receptor modulators. Of equal importance, RTI 3021-012 and RTI 3021-022 are two new antiprogestins that may have clinical utility and are likely to be useful as research reagents with which to separate the effects of antiprogestins and antiglucocorticoids in physiological systems.

Influence of Aromatase Inhibitors on Plasma Total Homocysteine in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Patients

In this study, we evaluated the effect of estrogen suppression with three aromatase inhibitors, aminoglutethimide (n = 30), formestane (n = 12), and exemestane (n = 10), and the progestin megestrol acetate (n = 21) on plasma total homocysteine (tHcy) in patients suffering from advanced breast cancer. Treatment with 1 g/day aminoglutethimide for 2 and 3–5 months increased plasma tHcy by a mean value of 24.5% [95% confidence interval, 10.5–40.4%] at 2 months and 35.8% (95% confidence interval, 18.2–55.9%) at 3–5 months, corresponding to increases in the mean plasma tHcy of 1.90 and 3.67 μmol/L, respectively. In contrast, none of the other treatment options influenced plasma tHcy concentrations. The finding that aminoglutethimide, but none of the other aromatase inhibitors or megestrol acetate, influenced plasma tHcy suggests that this effect is achieved by mechanisms not related to suppression of plasma estrogens or to the glucocorticoids administered in concert.

5-Benzylidene 1,2-dihydrochromeno[3,4-f]quinolines, a novel class of nonsteroidal human progesterone receptor agonists

A novel series of nonsteroidal progestins, 5-benzylidene-1, 2-dihydrochromeno[3,4-f]quinolines (2), was discovered, and a preliminary structure-activity relationship study around the 5-benzylidene ring generated several potent human progesterone receptor agonists (compounds 8, 16). These new progestins showed biological activities (EC50 = 5.7 and 7.6 nM) similar to progesterone (EC50 = 2.9 nM) in the cotransfection assay with high efficacy (132% and 166%) and binding affinity (Ki = 0.66 and 0.83 nM) similar to medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) (Ki = 0.34 nM). A representative analogue, 8, demonstrated similar oral potency to MPA in the uterine wet weight/mammary gland morphology assay in ovariectomized rats.

Influence of treatment with onapristone on the IGF-system in breast cancer patients

The influence of the novel antiprogestin onapristone on the serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system was studied in a group of 13 postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. Blood samples were obtained before treatment and subsequently after 1, 2 and 3 months on therapy. IGF-I, IGF-II and IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-2 were measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA). In addition, the IGFBP profile was evaluated by Western ligand blotting (WLB), and IGFBP-3 fragmentation determined by immunoblotting. A moderate (29%) but significant increase in IGF-I was observed after 3 months on treatment (p < 0.05). IGFBP-2 showed a significant, progressive increase during treatment when evaluated both by WLB (44% increase over baseline at 3 months) and by RIA (33% increase over baseline at 3 months). There was a non-significant trend towards an initial decrease in IGFBP-3 fragmentation. No significant alterations were observed in IGF-II or any of the binding proteins (except IGFBP-2) determined by Western ligand blotting. Due to the observation that onapristone treatment caused a moderate suppression of serum cortisol and androstenedione, we postulate the observed increase in IGF-I to be due to a slight glucocorticoid agonistic effect of the drug. On the contrary, the increase in IGFBP-2 may be related to disease progression as has been observed in patients suffering from prostatic cancer.

Progestins and breast cancer

In the last years there has been an extraordinary development in the synthesis of new progestins. These compounds are classified, in agreement with their structure, in various groups which include progesterone, retroprogesterones, 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterones, 19-norprogesterones, 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone derivatives, androstane and estrane derivatives. The action of progestins is a function of many factors: its structure, affinity to the progesterone receptor or to other steroid receptors, the target tissue considered, the biological response, the experimental conditions, dose, and metabolic transformation. The information on the action of progestins in breast cancer patients is very limited. Positive response with the progestins: medroxyprogesterone acetate and megestrol acetate was obtained in post-menopausal patients with advanced breast cancer. However, extensive information on the effect of progestins was obtained in in vitro studies using hormone-dependent and hormone-independent human mammary cancer cell lines. It was demonstrated that in the hormone-dependent breast cancer cells, various progestins (nomegestrol acetate, tibolone, medrogestone, promegestone) are potent sulfatase inhibitory agents. The progestins can also involve the inhibition of mRNA of this enzyme. In another series of studies it was also demonstrated that various progestins are very active in inhibiting the 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase for the conversion of estrone to estradiol. More recently it was observed that the progestins promegestone or medrogestone stimulate the sulfotransferase for the formation of estrogen sulfates. Consequently, the blockage in the formation of estradiol via sulfatase, or the stimulatory effect on sulfotransferase activity, by progestins can open interesting and new possibilities in clinical applications in breast cancer.

A randomised phase III cross-over study of tamoxifen versus megestrol acetate in advanced and recurrent breast cancer

139 peri- and postmenopausal women with advanced or recurrent breast cancer who had not received prior hormonal therapy were randomised in an open, cross-over study comparing the synthetic progestogen megestrol acetate with tamoxifen. The response rate (CR/PR) to megestrol acetate (25%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 15-35%) was not significantly different from that produced by tamoxifen (33%, CI 22-44%). Time-to-treatment failure was also similar in the two groups. Cross-over treatment was given on progression in 76 cases. Cross-over response (CR/PR) was seen in 3 of 35 patients (9%) receiving megestrol acetate as second-line therapy and in 6 of 41 patients (15%) receiving tamoxifen second-line. There was no significant difference in survival between the groups (P = 0.17) with median survival times of 24 and 32 months for the megestrol acetate and tamoxifen groups, respectively. The toxicity profile of the two drugs was different, although significant toxicity was rare with either agent. Megestrol acetate is an effective treatment for advanced breast cancer in older women when used either as first- or second-line treatment. Cross-over response is seen following both treatments. Given that most patients now receive tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment, megestrol acetate would appear to be one of the logical choices for patients who find the side-effects of tamoxifen unacceptable and for those who relapse on tamoxifen with further hormone therapy being clinically indicated.

Mechanisms of action of endocrine treatment in breast cancer

Endocrine treatment plays an important role in the therapy of breast cancer. While the basic mechanisms are understood, additional mechanisms may be of importance to their action and they may also contribute to the mechanism(s) of acquired resistance. Currently, several novel drugs are entering into clinical trials. Observations of the absence or presence of cross resistance to novel 'pure' steroidal antiestrogens and the non-steroidal tamoxifen may add important information to our understanding of the mechanisms of action of both classes of drugs. Similarly, exploration of different aromatase inhibitors in sequence or concert, as well as the combining of different endocrine treatment options may be warranted. Additionally, alterations in different biochemical parameters such as growth factors should not only be carefully explored in relation to treatment options but should also be followed during the course of treatment to asess alterations over time and in relation to the development of drug resistance.

Response of brain metastases from breast cancer to megestrol acetate: a case report

A 56 year old women was treated with megestrol acetate (Megace) 40 mg p.o. q.i.d. for her cerebellar metastasis of primary adenocarcinoma of the breast. She had previously undergone two surgical resections of her brain metastasis, and a course of radiotherapy. After failing to tolerate tamoxifen therapy, she received Megace, with marked improvement in her cerebellar tumor on CT scans. Despite good control of her brain tumor with Megace, she developed progressive neurological symptoms thought to be due to meningeal carcinomatosis, and died two years after initiating Megace therapy. We conclude that Megace could potentially be beneficial in some patients with brain metastases from adenocarcinoma of the breast.