Endocrine resistance in advanced breast cancer

Targeting c-Jun inhibits fatty acid oxidation to overcome tamoxifen resistance in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer

Tamoxifen-based endocrine therapy remains a major adjuvant therapy for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer (BC). However, many patients develop tamoxifen resistance, which results in recurrence and poor prognosis. Herein, we show that fatty acid oxidation (FAO) was activated in tamoxifen-resistant (TamR) ER-positive BC cells by performing bioinformatic and functional studies. We also reveal that CPT1A, the rate-limiting enzyme of FAO, was significantly overexpressed and that its enzymatic activity was enhanced in TamR cells. Mechanistically, the transcription factor c-Jun was activated by JNK kinase-mediated phosphorylation. Activated c-Jun bound to the TRE motif in the CPT1A promoter to drive CPT1A transcription and recruited CBP/P300 to chromatin, catalysing histone H3K27 acetylation to increase chromatin accessibility, which ensured more effective transcription of CPT1A and an increase in the FAO rate, eliminating the cytotoxic effects of tamoxifen in ER-positive BC cells. Pharmacologically, inhibiting CPT1A enzymatic activity with the CPT1 inhibitor etomoxir or blocking c-Jun phosphorylation with a JNK inhibitor restored the tamoxifen sensitivity of TamR cells. Clinically, high levels of phosphorylated c-Jun and CPT1A were observed in ER-positive BC tissues in patients with recurrence after tamoxifen therapy and were associated with poor survival. These results indicate that the assessment and targeting of the JNK/c-Jun-CPT1A-FAO axis will provide promising insights for clinical management, increased tamoxifen responses and improved outcomes for ER-positive BC patients.

Advances in Therapy for Hormone Receptor (HR)-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer Patients Who Have Experienced Progression After Treatment with CDK4/6 Inhibitors

Approximately 70% of breast cancer (BC) cases are hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) BC. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors have acted as star drugs for reversing endocrine therapy (ET) resistance and improving the prognosis of patients with HR+ advanced breast cancer (ABC) since they were initially approved. However, progression eventually occurs. In this review, we summarize the recent treatment strategies post CDK4/6 inhibitors: 1) CDK4/6 inhibitors plus exemestane and everolimus; 2) phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor alpelisib plus fulvestrant for patients with PIK3CA mutation; 3) poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor for patients with germline PALB2 mutations, somatic BRCA1/2 mutations, or germline BRCA1/2 mutations; 4) exemestane and everolimus; and (5) chemotherapy. These strategies are all supported by evidence from clinical trials and retrospective studies. We also describe potential future treatment strategies post CDK4/6 inhibitors, such as the trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (Trop-2) directed antibody–drug conjugate, cyclin-dependent kinase 7 (CDK7) inhibitors, and B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitors.

Endocrine Resistance in Breast Cancer: The Role of Estrogen Receptor Stability

Therapy of hormone receptor positive breast cancer (BCa) generally targets estrogen receptor (ER) function and signaling by reducing estrogen production or by blocking its interaction with the ER. Despite good long-term responses, resistance to treatment remains a significant issue, with approximately 40% of BCa patients developing resistance to ET. Mutations in the gene encoding ERα, ESR1, have been identified in BCa patients and are implicated as drivers of resistance and disease recurrence. Understanding the molecular consequences of these mutations on ER protein levels and its activity, which is tightly regulated, is vital. ER activity is in part controlled via its short protein half-life and therefore changes to its stability, either through mutations or alterations in pathways involved in protein stability, may play a role in therapy resistance. Understanding these connections and how ESR1 alterations could affect protein stability may identify novel biomarkers of resistance. This review explores the current reported data regarding posttranslational modifications (PTMs) of the ER and the potential impact of known resistance associated ESR1 mutations on ER regulation by affecting these PTMs in the context of ET resistance.

The interplay of endocrine therapy, steroid pathways and therapeutic resistance: Importance of androgen in breast carcinoma

A great majority of breast carcinomas expresses estrogen receptor (ER) and estrogens have crucial roles in the progress of breast carcinomas. Endocrine therapy targeting ER and/or intratumoral estrogen production significantly improved clinical outcomes of the patients with ER-positive breast carcinomas. However, resistance to endocrine therapy is often observed and significant number of patients will recur after the treatment. In addition, treatment for the patients with triple-negative breast carcinomas (negative for all ER, progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2) are limited to cytotoxic chemotherapy and novel therapeutic targets need to be identified. In breast carcinoma tissues, not only ER but androgen receptor (AR) is frequently expressed, suggesting pivotal roles of androgens in the progress of breast carcinomas. Growing interest on androgen action as possible therapeutic target has been taken, but androgen action seems quite complicated in breast carcinomas and inconsistent findings has been also proposed. In this review, we will summarize recent studies regarding intratumoral androgen production and its regulation as well as distinct subset of breast carcinomas characterized by activated AR signaling and recent clinical trial targeting AR in the patients with either ER-positive and ER-negative breast carcinomas.

Pharmacological inhibition of sphingosine kinase isoforms alters estrogen receptor signaling in human breast cancer

Recently, crosstalk between sphingolipid signaling pathways and steroid hormones has been illuminated as a possible therapeutic target. Sphingosine kinase (SK), the key enzyme metabolizing pro-apoptotic ceramide to pro-survival sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), is a promising therapeutic target for solid tumor cancers. In this study, we examined the ability of pharmacological inhibition of S1P formation to block estrogen signaling as a targeted breast cancer therapy. We found that the Sphk1/2 selective inhibitor (SK inhibitor (SKI))-II, blocked breast cancer viability, clonogenic survival and proliferation. Furthermore, SKI-II dose-dependently decreased estrogen-stimulated estrogen response element transcriptional activity and diminished mRNA levels of the estrogen receptor (ER)-regulated genes progesterone receptor and steroid derived factor-1. This inhibitor binds the ER directly in the antagonist ligand-binding domain. Taken together, our results suggest that SKIs have the ability to act as novel ER signaling inhibitors in breast carcinoma.

"Resurrection of clinical efficacy" after resistance to endocrine therapy in metastatic breast cancer

Background

In a significant proportion of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients whose tumour has progressed within 6 months of endocrine therapy (de novo resistance), it is generally believed that the chance of achieving clinical benefit (CB) with further endocrine therapy is minimal.

Methods

Data was retrieved from a prospectively updated database of metastatic breast cancer. Relevant data was exported to SPSS™ software for statistical analysis.

Results

In oestrogen receptor (ER) positive MBC patients with assessable disease, CB was achieved in 159 (71.3%) (1^st line) patients. When these patients were put on further endocrine therapy, the CB rates were 63.2% (on 2^nd line), 46.1% (on 3^rd line) and 20% (on 4^th line) with a median duration of response (DOR) in those with CB of 22, 12, 11 and 15 months respectively. The remaining 64(28.7%) patients had de novo resistance on 1^st line endocrine therapy. Seventeen of these patients were treated with further endocrine therapy. The CB rates were 29.4% (on 2^nd line) and 22.2% (on 3^rd line) with a median DOR in those with CB of 22.7 months and 14 months respectively.

Conclusion

The chance of further endocrine response continues to decrease with each line of therapy, yet CB is still seen with reasonable duration even with a 4^th line agent. In addition, further endocrine response, with long duration, can be seen in a significant proportion of patients who have developed de novo resistance to 1^st line endocrine therapy. The use of further endocrine therapy should not be excluded under these circumstances.

Comparison of HER-2/neu, ER and PCNA expression in premenopausal and postmenopausal patients with breast carcinoma

We attempted to compare the pattern of HER-2/neu, ER and PCNA in premenopausal and postmenopausal patients with breast carcinoma to identify potential biological differences. Five hundred and forty-eight samples from 318 premenopausal and 230 postmenopausal women with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast were evaluated for HER-2/neu, ER and PCNA expression by immunohistochemistry. HER-2/neu expression showed 27.4% positivity in premenopausal and 24.8% in postmenopausal women; there was no significant difference between the two groups (p>0.05). In contrast, HER-2/neu expression was found to be significantly associated with ER negativity in the two groups (p<0.05 in premenopausal, p<0.001 in postmenopausal patients). However, it was significantly associated with PCNA expression only in the postmenopausal group (p<0.001). 54.4% showed premenopausal tumor cell ER positivity, whereas 64.3% of the postmenopausal group showed positivity. ER expression showed a significant correlation with patient menopausal status (p<0.05). The prevalence of PCNA positivity in the tumor cell components is slightly higher in postmenopausal compared to premenopausal women (p>0.20). The current study is consistent with reports from other groups regarding the correlation of HER-2/neu with adverse pathologic features and with expression of other markers in carcinoma. We also observed there was no trend toward increased HER-2/neu expression in either premenopausal or postmenopausal patients, i.e. there was similar HER-2/neu expression in the two groups. This suggests that HER-2/neu status could be used to determine assignment to specific intensive adjuvant therapy and evaluation of biological behavior in both pre- and postmenopausal patients with breast carcinoma.

The antiepidermal growth factor receptor agent gefitinib (ZD1839/Iressa) improves antihormone response and prevents development of resistance in breast cancer in vitro

Although many estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers initially respond to antihormones, responses are commonly incomplete with resistance ultimately emerging. Delineation of signaling mechanisms underlying these phenomena would allow development of therapies to improve antihormone response and compromise resistance. This in vitro investigation in MCF-7 breast cancer cells examines whether epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling limits antiproliferative and proapoptotic activity of antihormones and ultimately supports development of resistance. It addresses whether the anti-EGFR agent gefitinib (ZD1839/Iressa; TKI: 1 mum) combined with the antihormones 4-hydroxytamoxifen (TAM: 0.1 mum) or fulvestrant (Faslodex; 0.1 mum) enhances growth inhibition and prevents resistance. TAM significantly suppressed MCF-7 growth over wk 2-5, reducing proliferation detected by immunocytochemistry and fluorescence-activated cell sorter cell cycle analysis. A modest apoptotic increase was observed by fluorescence-activated cell sorter and fluorescence microscopy, with incomplete bcl-2 suppression. EGFR induction occurred during TAM response, as measured by immunocytochemistry and Western blotting, with EGFR-positive, highly proliferative resistant growth subsequently emerging. Although TKI alone was ineffective on growth, TAM plus TKI cotreatment exhibited superior antigrowth activity vs. TAM, with no viable cells by wk 12. Cotreatment was more effective in inhibiting proliferation, promoting apoptosis, and eliminating bcl-2. Cotreatment blocked EGFR induction, markedly depleted ERK1/2 MAPK and protein kinase B phosphorylation, and prevented emergence of EGFR-positive resistance. Faslodex plus TKI cotreatment was also a superior antitumor strategy. Thus, increased EGFR evolves during treatment with antihormones, limiting their efficacy and promoting resistance. Gefitinib addition to antihormonal therapy could prove more effective in treating estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer and may combat development of resistance.

Enhanced estrogen receptor (ER) alpha, ERBB2, and MAPK signal transduction pathways operate during the adaptation of MCF-7 cells to long term estrogen deprivation

The mechanisms involved in resistance to estrogen deprivation are of major importance for optimal patient therapy and the development of new drugs. Long term culture of MCF-7 cells in estrogen (E2)-depleted medium (long term estrogen deprivation; LTED) results in hypersensitivity to E2 coinciding with elevated levels of estrogen receptor (ER) alpha phosphorylated on Ser118 and MAPK, together with several of its downstream targets associated previously with ERalpha phosphorylation. Our data suggest elevated MAPK activity results from enhanced ERBB2 expression in the LTED cells versus the wild-type (wt), and treatment with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor ZD1839 revealed increased sensitivity in both transcription and proliferation assays. Similarly the MEK inhibitor U0126 decreased transcription and proliferation in the LTED cells and reduced their sensitivity to the proliferative effects of E2, while having no effect on the wt. However, the complete suppression of MAPK activity in the LTED cells did not inhibit ERalpha Ser118 phosphorylation suggesting that ER activity remained ligand-dependant. The LTED cells also expressed elevated levels of insulin-like growth factor-1R, and inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity with LY294002 reduced basal ERalpha transactivation by 70% in the LTED cells compared with the wt. However, LY294002 had no effect on ERalpha Ser118 phosphorylation. These data suggest that although elevated levels of MAPK occur during LTED and influence the phenotype, this is unlikely to be the sole pathway operating to achieve adaptation.

Tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer: elucidating mechanisms

Tamoxifen has been used for the systemic treatment of patients with breast cancer for nearly three decades. Treatment success is primarily dependent on the presence of the estrogen receptor (ER) in the breast carcinoma. While about half of patients with advanced ER-positive disease immediately fail to respond to tamoxifen, in the responding patients the disease ultimately progresses to a resistant phenotype. The possible causes for intrinsic and acquired resistance have been attributed to the pharmacology of tamoxifen, alterations in the structure and function of the ER, the interactions with the tumour environment and genetic alterations in the tumour cells. So far no prominent mechanism leading to resistance has been identified. The recent results of a functional screen for breast cancer antiestrogen resis- tance (BCAR) genes responsible for development of tamoxifen resistance in human breast cancer cells are reviewed. Individual BCAR genes can transform estrogen-dependent breast cancer cells into estrogen-independent and tamoxifen-resistant cells in vitro. Furthermore, high levels of BCAR1/pl30Cas protein in ER-positive primary breast tumours are associated with intrinsic resistance to tamoxifen treatment. These results indicate a prominent role for alternative growth control pathways independent of ER signalling in intrinsic tamoxifen resistance of ER-positive breast carcinomas. Deciphering the differentiation characteristics of normal and malignant breast epithelial cells with respect to proliferation control and regulation of cell death (apoptosis) is essential for understanding therapy response and development of resistance of breast carcinoma.

Variation of ER status between primary and metastatic breast cancer and relationship to p53 expression*

OBJECTIVE

Estrogen-dependent growth of breast cancer can be blocked by anti-estrogens. Estrogen receptor (ER) presence in breast cancer implies responsiveness to endocrine therapy. However, for those patients who ultimately develop resistance to endocrine therapy, the mechanisms remain unclear. The present study attempted to compare the expression status of ER mRNA in a series of primary breast tumors with matched metastases and explored the relation between ER and mutant p53 expression.

METHODS

In situ hybridization using a digoxigenin-labeled estrogen receptor cDNA probe was employed to determine the expression of ER mRNA in 52 cases of primary tumors and their matched axillary lymph node metastases. Immunohistochemical staining using a monoclonal antibody against ER was also performed.

RESULTS

ER expression was observed in 53.8% (28/52) of primary tumors and 48% (25/52) of metastases, while 57.7% (30/52) of primary tumors and 53.8% (28/52) of metastases showed ER mRNA positivity. There were variations in ER status between in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry measurements and between primary tumors and metastases. Mutant p53 expression was inversely associated with ER-negative, high-grade tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

In situ hybridization may be a more specific and sensitive method for determination of ER status than immunohistochemistry. It is possible that the biologic properties of ER change, and these changes may influence tumor response to endocrine therapy. In view of the ER variation, it was suggested that the ER status of metastatic tumors in addition to primary tumors should be taken into consideration in order to better determine the benefit of clinical endocrine therapy.

Antiaromatase agents after adjuvant tamoxifen: rationale and clinical implications

Although tamoxifen is considered standard adjuvant hormonal therapy in receptor-positive, stage I and II breast cancer, information on its optimal duration of administration has only been reported recently and, for many, the subject is still a matter of scientific debate. Data suggest that there is a time period beyond which, if tamoxifen is continued, it may become ineffective or even detrimental to the patient. Tamoxifen is usually discontinued after approximately 5 years of therapy, at which time most patients are thought to be disease free; however, some patients may harbor residual micrometastases. A fraction of these patients will have micrometastatic tumor cells that are still responsive to tamoxifen, and tamoxifen discontinuation could result in cancer cell growth. The preponderance of clinical data, however, indicate that a greater fraction of patients will have micrometastatic tumor cells that have become progressively resistant to tamoxifen. In fact, tumor cell growth could be stimulated by continued therapy with the drug. Although in some patients the micrometastatic tumor cells may have become hormonally unresponsive, in most cases (tamoxifen-responsive or tamoxifen-stimulated micrometastases), the tumor remains hormonally responsive. Therefore, the use of anti-aromatase agents to reduce the level of estrogenic stimulation and, as a result, the risk of recurrence may prove to be a valuable approach at the time of tamoxifen discontinuation. The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) is in the final stages of developing a clinical trial (NSABP B-33) to evaluate the effect of administering 2 years of therapy with the aromatase inactivator exemestane to postmenopausal, receptor-positive patients who have completed 5 years of tamoxifen therapy and are disease free at the time of tamoxifen discontinuation.