1
|
Schellack S, Breidenbach C, Rick O, Kowalski C. Predictive factors for return to work among cancer survivors in Europe: A systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 200:104422. [PMID: 38897312 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Revised: 06/13/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Of the 4.4 million people diagnosed with cancer in Europe each year, around 36 % are of working age. Return-to-work rates vary across Europe. Work is important for the individual, as well as for society, and this review aims to provide an overview of the predictors for the return to work (RTW) process in European cancer survivors of working age. A systematic literature search was conducted. The present review included quantitative and qualitative study designs published since 2013. In total, the review included 85 papers examining cancer survivors with various cancer diagnoses in 18 European countries. Identified predictive factors for RTW related to the social system, treatment, disease, health behavior, the individuals' psychosocial, work, and sociodemographic situations. There is a need for a standardized definition and operationalization of RTW. Providers can use these results to identify survivors at risk and support cancer survivors in their RTW process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Schellack
- German Cancer Society, Kuno-Fischer-Straße 8, Berlin 14057, Germany.
| | | | - Oliver Rick
- Center for Oncology Rehabilitation, Clinic Reinhardshoehe, Quellenstraße 8-12, Bad Wildungen 34537, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ding M, Gane E, Wiffen H, Johnston V. Tools to assess employment readiness for colorectal cancer survivors: A scoping review. Cancer Med 2023; 12:18327-18353. [PMID: 37559402 PMCID: PMC10523978 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ability to return to work and remain at work is an important recovery milestone after a cancer diagnosis. With the projected number of colorectal cancer patients of working age likely to increase, it is important to identify when a person is ready to resume work. There are many employment-related tools available to help people return to work after injury or illness; however, it is unknown which may be suitable for a person with colorectal cancer. AIM To identify tools related to employment readiness in colorectal cancer survivors and to chart the relevant factors of employment assessed by these tools. METHOD Literature searches were performed in PubMed, CINAHL, Embase and Medline, the Cochrane library and PsycINFO using search terms around cancer, survivorship and employment to identify all peer-reviewed articles published in English up to June 2022. RESULTS Thirty-five studies used a total of 77 tools focused on assessing employment issues experienced by people with cancer in general. Four tools were used with colorectal cancer survivors. None considered all relevant employment-related factors for colorectal cancer survivors. CONCLUSION Tools used to identify return-to-work and remain-at-work were not specific to colorectal cancer. There are a range of existing tools that collate some, but not all, of the domains and outcome criteria required to meet the employment needs of colorectal cancer survivors. To optimize work outcomes for the working colorectal cancer population, a specified tool is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingshuang Ding
- School of Health and Rehabilitation SciencesThe University of QueenslandSt LuciaQueenslandAustralia
- EBSCO Information ServicesBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Elise Gane
- School of Health and Rehabilitation SciencesThe University of QueenslandSt LuciaQueenslandAustralia
- Physiotherapy DepartmentPrincess Alexandra HospitalIpswichMassachusettsUSA
| | - Harry Wiffen
- Royal Brisbane and Women's HospitalBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Venerina Johnston
- School of Health and Rehabilitation SciencesThe University of QueenslandSt LuciaQueenslandAustralia
- School of Health and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Engineering and SciencesUniversity of Southern QueenslandDarling HeightsQueenslandAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This systematic review aims to assess what is known about convalescence following abdominal surgery. Through a review of the basic science and clinical literature, we explored the effect of physical activity on the healing fascia and the optimal timing for postoperative activity. BACKGROUND Abdominal surgery confers a 30% risk of incisional hernia development. To mitigate this, surgeons often impose postoperative activity restrictions. However, it is unclear whether this is effective or potentially harmful in preventing hernias. METHODS We conducted 2 separate systematic reviews using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The first assessed available basic science literature on fascial healing. The second assessed available clinical literature on activity after abdominal surgery. RESULTS Seven articles met inclusion criteria for the basic science review and 22 for the clinical studies review. The basic science data demonstrated variability in maximal tensile strength and time for fascial healing, in part due to differences in layer of abdominal wall measured. Some animal studies indicated a positive effect of physical activity on the healing wound. Most clinical studies were qualitative, with only 3 randomized controlled trials on this topic. Variability was reported on clinician recommendations, time to return to activity, and factors that influence return to activity. Interventions designed to shorten convalescence demonstrated improvements only in patient-reported symptoms. None reported an association between activity and complications, such as incisional hernia. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review identified gaps in our understanding of what is best for patients recovering from abdominal surgery. Randomized controlled trials are crucial in safely optimizing the recovery period.
Collapse
|
4
|
Güsgen C, Willms A, Schaaf S, Prior M, Weber C, Schwab R. Lack of Standardized Advice on Physical Strain Following Abdominal Surgery. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2021; 117:737-744. [PMID: 33439823 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2019] [Revised: 11/26/2019] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Germany as elsewhere, standardized recommendations are lacking on the avoidance of physical exertion to protect the abdom - inal wall in patients who have recently undergone abdominal surgery. It is unclear how much stress the abdominal wall can withstand and how long the patient should be exempted from work. The goal of this review is to determine whether there are any standardized, evidence-based recommendations for postoperative care from which valid recommendations for Germany can be derived. METHODS We systematically searched the literature for evidence-based recommendations on exertion avoidance after abdominal surgery, as well as for information on the extent to which postoperative abdominal wall stress contributes to incisional hernia formation. We then created a questionnaire on recommendation practices and sent it to all of the chiefs of general and visceral surgery services that were listed in the German hospital registry (1078 chiefs of service as of June 2016). RESULTS All 16 of the included studies on postoperative exertion avoidance contained low-level evidence that could only be used to formulate weak recommendations ("can," rather than "should" or "must"). Some 50 000 incisional hernia repair procedures are performed in Germany each year, with a reported incidence of 12.8% in the first two years after surgery. The scientifically documented risk factors for incisional herniation are related to techniques of wound closure, the suture materials used, wound infections, and the patient risk profile. From the biological point of view, the abdominal wall regains full, normal resistance to exertional stress 30 days after a laparotomy with uncomplicated healing. Most incisional hernias (>50%) arise 18 months or more after surgery; they are more common in patients who have avoided exertion for longer periods of time (more than 8 weeks). Our questionnaire was returned by 386 surgical clinics. The responses showed that 78% of recommendations were based on personal experience only. The recommendations varied widely; exertion avoidance was recommended for as long as 6 months. CONCLUSION The dilemma of a deficient evidence base for postoperative exertion avoidance to protect the abdominal wall should be resolved with the much higher-quality evidence available from hernia research, which concerns the patient population with the biologically least favorable starting conditions. Based on our analysis of the available literature in light of the biomechanical principles of abdominal wall healing, we propose a new set of recommendations on postoperative exertion avoidance after abdominal surgery, with the goal of eliminating excessively protracted exertion avoidance and enabling a timely return to work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Güsgen
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Central Hospital, German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV), Koblenz, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy diagnosed in North American men. Although medical advances have improved survival rates, men treated for prostate cancer experience side-effects that can reduce their work capacity, increase financial stress, and affect their career and/or retirement plans. Working-age males comprise a significant proportion of new prostate cancer diagnoses. It is important, therefore, to understand the connections between prostate cancer and men’s work lives. This scoping review aimed to summarize and disseminate current research evidence about the impact of prostate cancer treatment on men’s work lives. Electronic databases were searched to identify peer-reviewed articles published between 2006 and 2020 that reported on the impact of prostate cancer treatment on men’s work. Following scoping review guidelines, 21 articles that met inclusion criteria were identified and analyzed. Evidence related to the impact of prostate cancer on work was grouped under three themes: (1) work outcomes after prostate cancer treatment; (2) return to work considerations, and (3) impact of prostate cancer treatment on men’s finances. Findings indicate that men’s return to work may be more gradual than expected after prostate cancer treatment. Some men may feel pressured by financial stressors and masculine ideals to resume work. Diverse factors including older age and social benefits appear to play a role in shaping men’s work-related plans after prostate cancer treatment. The findings provide direction for future research and offer clinicians a synthesis of current knowledge about the challenges men face in resuming work in the aftermath of prostate cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wellam F Yu Ko
- University of British Columbia, School of Nursing, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - John L Oliffe
- University of British Columbia, School of Nursing, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Joan L Bottorff
- University of British Columbia, School of Nursing, Kelowna, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Omil-Lima DO, Gupta K, Calaway AC, Zell MA. Historical Considerations and Surgical Quality Improvement in Robotic Prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am 2020; 48:35-44. [PMID: 33218592 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2020.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Laparoscopic prostatectomy was technically challenging and not widely adopted. Robotics led to the widespread adoption of minimally invasive prostatectomy, which has been used heavily, supplanting the open and traditional laparoscopic approach. The benefits of robotic prostatectomy are disputed. Data suggest that robotic prostatectomy outcomes have improved over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danly O Omil-Lima
- Urology Institute, University Hospitals-Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
| | - Karishma Gupta
- Urology Institute-University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Adam C Calaway
- Urology Institute-University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Michael A Zell
- Urology Institute-University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yu Ko WF, Oliffe JL, Johnson JL, Bottorff JL. Reformulating the Worker Identity: Men's Experiences After Radical Prostatectomy. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2020; 30:1225-1236. [PMID: 30674232 DOI: 10.1177/1049732318825150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
The number of men in the Canadian workforce who have prostate cancer is increasing. The purpose of the study was to explore the processes involved in men's return to work post radical prostatectomy and understand how these events are connected to masculinities. Drawing on data collected through individual interviews with 24 participants, constructivist grounded theory method was used to develop the substantive theory of Reformulating the Worker Identity which comprises two processes, recovering after radical prostatectomy and renegotiating work expectations. Recovering after radical prostatectomy revealed how men overcame side effects at home and evaluated their potential for returning to work. Renegotiating work expectations included participant's strategies for securing graduated return to work accommodations. Study findings revealed that the challenges for fully returning to work post prostatectomy are often underestimated by clinicians and patients. In this context, preempting return to work challenges preoperatively might allay significant anxieties for many men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wellam F Yu Ko
- The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - John L Oliffe
- The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Joy L Johnson
- Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Joan L Bottorff
- The University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nilsson R, Dahl AA, Bernklev T, Kersten H, Haug ES. Work status and work ability after radical prostatectomy or active surveillance for prostate cancer. Scand J Urol 2020; 54:194-200. [PMID: 32285740 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2020.1750473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Objective: Being able to work is important for health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and little is known about work life after radical treatment for prostate cancer (PCa). The aim was to investigate work status (WS) and work ability (WA) after radical prostatectomy (RP) or active surveillance (AS) for PCa, and to identify factors associated with reduced WA.Materials and methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of 606 men treated with RP (n = 442) or AS (n = 164) at two Norwegian general hospitals. In 2017, they were asked to complete questionnaires measuring adverse effects (AE), HRQoL, aspects of work life and psychological factors at a median of 4.1 (range 1.3-8.1) years after diagnosis. Clinical data were retrieved from medical records. WS was categorized into employed, unemployed or retired. WA was rated using the Work Ability Index. Regression analyses were performed to find factors associated with reduced WA.Results: WS was similar for the RP and AS groups at diagnosis and survey. There was a small reduction in WA from diagnosis to survey and the difference between the RP and AS groups was non-significant. Older age, poorer self-rated health, poorer incontinence score, more chronic fatigue, and increased anxiety and depressive symptoms were associated with reduced WA, while treatment method, urinary bother and use of pads were not.Conclusion: The impact of RP and AS on WS and WA was almost similar. Age and psychological variables were more strongly associated with reduced WA than cancer-related variables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rasmus Nilsson
- Department of Urology, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Alv A Dahl
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,National Advisory Unit for Late Effects after Cancer Therapy, Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tomm Bernklev
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Research and Development, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.,Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien, Norway
| | - Hege Kersten
- Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien, Norway.,Department of Pharmaceutical Bioscience, School of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Erik S Haug
- Department of Urology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.,Institute of Cancer Genomics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
|
10
|
Impact of Robotic Surgery on Sick Leave and Return to Work in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy: An Evidence-Based Analysis. UROLOGY PRACTICE 2020. [DOI: 10.1097/upj.0000000000000069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
11
|
McLennan V, Ludvik D, Chambers S, Frydenberg M. Work after prostate cancer: a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv 2019; 13:282-291. [PMID: 30900159 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-019-00750-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Research in the field of vocational rehabilitation, specifically for prostate cancer, remains rare despite increasing recognition of the role of vocational interventions in other cancer groups. The aim of this review was to compile and evaluate current trends, facilitators and barriers associated with returning to work after a prostate cancer diagnosis. METHOD The literature search was conducted in March 2018 using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Forty-seven original research papers published in English in peer-reviewed journals were identified. The included studies comprised a total of 20,083 prostate cancer patients with a mean age of 61 years. RESULTS The studies implied a good overall return to work prognosis in prostate cancer patients; however, these findings are not generalisable to those with physically demanding or low paid jobs, comorbid conditions or poor physical functioning. CONCLUSION The limited research investigating the long-term implications of prostate cancer indicates that there may be problems related to job retention and early unwanted retirement. Facilitators and barriers to employment after prostate cancer are identified and implications for vocational interventions and further research are discussed. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS This review helps to shed light on the barriers and facilitators to employment among prostate cancer survivors, as well as the need for further research and development in vocational rehabilitation interventions for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanette McLennan
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia. .,School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia.
| | - Dominika Ludvik
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia
| | - Suzanne Chambers
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia.,University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia.,Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Department of Surgery, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ullrich A, Rath HM, Otto U, Kerschgens C, Raida M, Hagen-Aukamp C, Bergelt C. Return to work in prostate cancer survivors - findings from a prospective study on occupational reintegration following a cancer rehabilitation program. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:751. [PMID: 30029637 PMCID: PMC6053748 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4614-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2017] [Accepted: 06/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background This prospective multicentre-study aimed to analyze return to work (RTW) among prostate cancer survivors 12 months after having attended a cancer rehabilitation program and to identify risk factors for no and late RTW. Methods Seven hundred eleven employed prostate cancer survivors treated with radical prostatectomy completed validated self-rating questionnaires at the beginning, the end, and 12 months post rehabilitation. Disease-related data was obtained from physicians and medical records. Work status and time until RTW were assessed at 12-months follow-up. Data were analyzed by univariate analyses (t-tests, chi-square-tests) and multivariate logistic regression models (OR with 95% CI). Results The RTW rate at 12-months follow-up was 87% and the median time until RTW was 56 days. Univariate analyses revealed significant group differences in baseline personal characteristics and health status, psychosocial well-being and work-related factors between survivors who had vs. had not returned to work. Patients’ perceptions of not being able to work (OR 3.671) and feeling incapable to return to the former job (OR 3.162) were the strongest predictors for not having returned to work at 12-months follow-up. Being diagnosed with UICC tumor stage III (OR 2.946) and patients’ perceptions of not being able to work (OR 4.502) were the strongest predictors for late RTW (≥ 8 weeks). Conclusions A high proportion of prostate cancer survivors return to work after a cancer rehabilitation program. However, results indicate the necessity to early identify survivors with low RTW motivation and unfavorable work-related perceptions who may benefit from intensified occupational support during cancer rehabilitation. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4614-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anneke Ullrich
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Hilke Maria Rath
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ullrich Otto
- Rehabilitation Clinics Hartenstein GmbH, Clinic Quellental, Bad Wildungen, Germany
| | | | - Martin Raida
- HELIOS Rehabilitation Clinic Bergisch-Land, Wuppertal, Germany
| | | | - Corinna Bergelt
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
von Mechow S, Graefen M, Haese A, Tennstedt P, Pehrke D, Friedersdorff F, Beyer B. Return to work following robot-assisted laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy: A single-center cohort study to compare duration of sick leave. Urol Oncol 2018; 36:309.e1-309.e6. [PMID: 29551549 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2017] [Revised: 01/16/2018] [Accepted: 02/13/2018] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the duration of sick leave in patients with localized prostate cancer after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and open retropubic RP (ORP) at a German high-volume prostate cancer center. METHODS The data of 1,415 patients treated with RP at Martini Klinik, Prostate Cancer Center between 2012 and 2016 were, retrospectively, analyzed. Information on employment status, monthly revenues and days of work missed due to sickness were assessed via online questionnaire. Additional data were retrieved from our institutional database. Medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) were reported for continuous data. Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to compare both surgical techniques for return to work time after RP. RESULTS Median time elapsed between surgery and return to work comprised 42 days in patients undergoing RARP (IQR: 21-70) and ORP (IQR: 28-84, P = 0.05). In Cox regression analysis, surgical approach showed no impact on return to work time (RARP vs. ORP hazard ratio = 1, 95% CI: 0.91-1.16, P = 0.69). Return to work time was significantly associated with employment status, physical workload and monthly income (all P<0.001). Limitation of this study is the nonrandomized design in a single-center. CONCLUSIONS As the surgical approach did not show any influence on the number of days missed from work in patients undergoing RP, no superiority of either RARP or ORP could be identified for return to work time in a German cohort. Both surgical approaches are safe options usually allowing the patients to resume normal activities including work after an appropriate convalescence period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie von Mechow
- Martini Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Haese
- Martini Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pierre Tennstedt
- Martini Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Pehrke
- Martini Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Burkhard Beyer
- Martini Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Matthew AG, Raz O, Currie KL, Louis AS, Jiang H, Davidson T, Fleshner NE, Finelli A, Trachtenberg J. Psychological distress and lifestyle disruption in low-risk prostate cancer patients: Comparison between active surveillance and radical prostatectomy. J Psychosoc Oncol 2017; 36:159-174. [DOI: 10.1080/07347332.2017.1342733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew G. Matthew
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Orit Raz
- Department of Urology, Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kristen L. Currie
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alyssa S. Louis
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Haiyan Jiang
- Department of Biostatistics, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tal Davidson
- Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Neil E. Fleshner
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Antonio Finelli
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - John Trachtenberg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Outcomes across the return-to-work process in PC survivors attending a rehabilitation measure—results from a prospective study. Support Care Cancer 2017; 25:3007-3015. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-017-3790-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2017] [Accepted: 06/07/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
16
|
Sozialmedizinische Begutachtung bei Patienten mit Prostatakarzinom. Urologe A 2016; 55:1481-1486. [DOI: 10.1007/s00120-016-0139-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
17
|
Gettman MT. Assessing Work Disability After Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2016; 70:72-73. [PMID: 26810116 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2016] [Accepted: 01/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew T Gettman
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Work Disability After Robot-assisted or Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Nationwide, Population-based Study. Eur Urol 2016; 70:64-71. [PMID: 26782345 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2015] [Accepted: 12/29/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has been associated with reduced bleeding and shorter hospital stays than open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), but it is unclear whether these differences translate into shorter absence from work. OBJECTIVE To investigate short- and long-term rates of work disability following RARP and RRP. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We conducted a nationwide population-based cohort study of 2571 men of working age treated with RARP or RRP between 2007 and 2009 identified in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden. Information about physician-certified sick leave and disability pension was retrieved from the Swedish Social Insurance Agency through 2012. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS We used Cox regression to calculate time to return to work (RTW, or duration of sick leave) after surgery and used generalised estimating equations to analyse days lost from work (because of sick leave and disability pension) after RTW. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Men treated with RARP returned to work after a median of 35 d, whereas the corresponding time for RRP was 48 d (p<0.001). The difference was seen early; within the first month, men treated with RARP returned to work nearly four times faster than men treated with RRP (adjusted relative RTW rate 3.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.04-4.66). During a median of 3.6 yr after return to work, men treated with RARP lost fewer days from work per person-year than men treated with RRP-12 d versus 15 d-but the association was not statistically significant (p=0.10). The adjusted rate ratio was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.82-1.42). One limitation is the nonrandomised design of this study. CONCLUSIONS RARP was associated with a faster RTW compared with RRP, but the surgical method did not influence long-term rates of work disability in terms of days lost from work after RTW. PATIENT SUMMARY We compared disease-related absence from work between two surgical methods for the removal of the prostate. Robot-assisted surgery was associated with a faster return to work compared with open surgery but did not influence absence from work in a long-term perspective.
Collapse
|
19
|
Raabe NK, Normann M, Lilleby W. Low-dose-rate brachytherapy for low-grade prostate cancer. TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LEGEFORENING 2015; 135:548-52. [PMID: 25806763 DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.13.1404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer is a radiosensitive type of cancer for which radiotherapy is used for both curative and palliative purposes. Low-dose-rate brachytherapy is an internal radiotherapy technique which allows high doses of radiation to be delivered to a tumour at short range and with a high degree of precision. We have conducted a systematic review of the evidence base for this treatment. The method is not established in Norway. METHOD This review is based on systematic review articles and publications on treatment, outcomes, adverse effects and health economics considerations found by searching the databases Cochrane Library, Current Controlled Trials, Medline, Embase and NICE (National Institute of Clinical Excellence). RESULTS Subsequent to long-term observations of the efficacy, adverse effects and costs presented in 43 selected studies, including one randomised, controlled trial, there is still uncertainty as to which of the three methods low-dose brachytherapy, external radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy is optimal. The reason for this is the methodological differences in patient selection and in endpoints such as biochemical disease-free interval and cause-specific survival. The evidence base appears to suggest that low-dose-rate brachytherapy causes more frequent grade 2 and 3 doctor-reported urogenital adverse effects than prostatectomy, but better patient-reported sexual functions and fewer patients with urinary incontinence than after surgery. Low-dose-rate brachytherapy appears to be socioeconomically cost-effective. INTERPRETATION The evidence base with respect to therapeutic effect and toxicity in men with low-risk prostate cancer treated with low-dose brachytherapy is regarded as solidly documented. However, there are no good prospective randomised multi-centre trials with overall survival as an endpoint.
Collapse
|
20
|
Dahl S, Loge JH, Berge V, Dahl AA, Cvancarova M, Fosså SD. Influence of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer on work status and working life 3 years after surgery. J Cancer Surviv 2014; 9:172-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s11764-014-0399-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2014] [Accepted: 09/01/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
21
|
Affiliation(s)
- Karin E Smedby
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden and Center for Hematology, Karolinska University Hospital , Stockholm , Sweden
| |
Collapse
|