Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity in human pancreatic tumor tissues

Systemic therapies for pancreatic cancer--the role of pharmacogenetics

Effective systemic treatment of pancreatic cancer remains a major challenge, with progress hampered by drug resistance and treatment related toxicities. Currently available cytotoxic agents as monotherapy or in combination have provided only a modest survival benefit for patients with advanced disease. Disappointing phase III results with gemcitabine-based combinations in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer might be related to poor efficacy of systemic therapies in unselected patients. Future research strategies should prioritize identification of predictive markers through pharmacogenetic investigations. The individualization of patient treatment through pharmacogenetics may help to improve outcome by maximizing efficacy whilst lowering toxicity. This review provides an update on the pharmacogenetics of pancreatic cancer treatment and its influence on treatment benefits and toxicity.

Systemic therapies for pancreatic cancer--the role of pharmacogenetics

Effective systemic treatment of pancreatic cancer remains a major challenge, with progress hampered by drug resistance and treatment related toxicities. Currently available cytotoxic agents as monotherapy or in combination have provided only a modest survival benefit for patients with advanced disease. Disappointing phase III results with gemcitabine-based combinations in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer might be related to poor efficacy of systemic therapies in unselected patients. Future research strategies should prioritize identification of predictive markers through pharmacogenetic investigations. The individualization of patient treatment through pharmacogenetics may help to improve outcome by maximizing efficacy whilst lowering toxicity. This review provides an update on the pharmacogenetics of pancreatic cancer treatment and its influence on treatment benefits and toxicity.

Suppression of DPYD expression in RKO cells via DNA methylation in the regulatory region of the DPYD promoter: a potentially important epigenetic mechanism regulating DPYD expression

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is one of the factors that determine the efficacy and toxicity of 5-fluorouracil. Variations in DPD activity may result from alterations at the transcriptional level of the DPYD gene. Heterogeneity in DPYD expression has been reported, but the molecular mechanisms responsible for this remain unclear. We investigated methylation of the DPYD promoter as a mechanism for transcriptional regulation of DPYD in the RKO colorectal cancer cell line. We demonstrate that the active transcription machinery for DPYD is present in RKO cells, but promoter binding of Sp1, a transactivator of DPYD, was inhibited, which on subsequent examination was shown to be associated with dense promoter methylation. Treatment with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine alone or the combination of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine and trichostatin A induced demethylation of the promoter and markedly increased the DPYD mRNA level in RKO cells but not in unmethylated WiDr cells. Furthermore, in vitro methylation of the DPYD promoter decreased promoter activity. These data suggest an important role for methylation in DPYD suppression. The transcriptional suppression of DPYD by methylation may be responsible for the increased 5-fluorouracil sensitivity observed in some patients. This may also provide insight into the mechanism underlying the downregulation of DPYD in some colorectal cancers.

Regulation of human dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase: implications in the pharmacogenetics of 5-FU-based chemotherapy

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase is the enzyme that is critical for the efficacy and toxicity of the anticancer reagent 5-fluorouracil. It has been demonstrated that the regulation of the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene has an important role in the determination of the enzyme activity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase. The regulation of the gene expression is thus discussed from two aspects: normal regulation by specificity proteins, and the epigenetic regulation by promoter methylation. The influence of the polymorphism on dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase enzyme activity and other factors that have been suggested to be involved in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase regulation are also discussed.

Thymidylate synthase expression in resectable and unresectable pancreatic cancer: role as predictive or prognostic marker?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Thymidylate synthase (TS) is an important enzyme for DNA synthesis and the target for 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Its expression may determine the outcome of patients with gastrointestinal cancers. We examined the prognostic and predictive value of TS-protein expression in patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

METHODS

TS expression from 131 patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas was analyzed by immunohistochemistry in paraffin-embedded primary tumour specimens or biopsies.

RESULTS

The median disease-specific survival among all patients (n=131) was 13 months. The invasion depth, the presence of metastases, grading and Union Internationale Contre le Cancer [International Union Against Cancer] (UICC) stage were associated with survival. Among resected patients (n=98), a difference in median survival was seen in the group receiving postoperative adjuvant treatment (21.1 months) compared with the group treated by surgery alone (12.4 months) (p=0.025). Low- and high-TS immunoreactivity was present in 74 (56%) and 56 (43%) of the cancers, respectively. One sample was not evaluable. No difference in median survival was observed among low- and high-TS-expressing tumours. Among patients undergoing resection and receiving postoperative intra-arterial chemotherapy (n=23), a marked trend to a longer median survival was seen for the group with low-TS-expressing tumours compared with the corresponding high-TS group (25.0 vs 16.0 months) (p=0.3834). There was no difference in survival among all palliative treated patients with low- and high-TS-expressing tumours.

CONCLUSION

Especially patients undergoing tumour resection with low-TS values seemed to have taken advantage from an intensified postoperative chemotherapeutic protocol. However due to the heterogeneous group of patients in the present report, larger trials of more homogenous patient populations will be necessary to confirm this hypothesis.

The role of Sp1 and Sp3 in the constitutive DPYD gene expression

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), the initial and rate-limiting enzyme in the 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) catabolic pathway, has been implicated as one of the factors determining the efficacy and toxicity of the anticancer agent 5-FU. Studies have attributed variation in DPD activity partially to alterations at the transcriptional level of DPYD gene. We investigated the transcription factors implicated in the constitutive expression of DPYD by utilizing a 174-bp fragment of the DPYD promoter region in which three consensus Sp protein binding sites (SpA, SpB and SpC) were predicted. The binding of Sp1 and Sp3 transcription factors to this region was detected by electrophoretic mobility shift and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. By ectopically expressing human Sp1 and Sp3 in Sp-deficient Drosophila S2 cells, we demonstrated that Sp1 is a strong activator, while Sp3 by its own is a weak activator of the DPYD promoter. Moreover, Sp3 may serve as a competitor of Sp1, thus decreasing the Sp1 induced promoter activity. SpA, SpB and SpC sites are all Sp1 inducible. In the full activation of the DPYD promoter in human cell lines, the SpB site is essential; the SpC site works cooperatively with SpB, while SpA has minor promoter activity. These studies provide further insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying the heterogeneity of DPD activity, and may facilitate the efficacy and safety of 5-FU-based chemotherapy.

Thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activities in non-small cell lung cancer tissues: relationship with in vitro sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil

We examined enzymatic activities of thymidylate synthase (TS) and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissues to determine the relationship to tumor sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). TS and DPD activities were measured in 60 surgically resected primary NSCLC tissues using a TS-binding assay and a radioenzyme assay, respectively. In vitro tumor sensitivity to 5-FU was assayed using a collagen gel droplet embedded culture drug test (CD-DST). DPD activities slightly correlated with in vitro sensitivity to 5-FU (r=0.402,P=0.013), such that tumors with higher DPD activity were more resistant to 5-FU. In contrast, no correlation was observed in TS activities. Thus, it was suggested that only DPD activity in NSCLC tissues is a potential indicator in predicting tumor sensitivity to 5-FU. Based on these results, further study is needed to evaluate the clinical significance of these enzymes in 5-FU-based chemotherapy for patients with NSCLC.