Chemical Adhesion Barriers: Do They Affect the Intraperitoneal Behavior of a Composite Mesh?

Prevention of Post-Operative Adhesions: A Comprehensive Review of Present and Emerging Strategies

Post-operative adhesions affect patients undergoing all types of surgeries. They are associated with serious complications, including higher risk of morbidity and mortality. Given increased hospitalization, longer operative times, and longer length of hospital stay, post-surgical adhesions also pose a great financial burden. Although our knowledge of some of the underlying mechanisms driving adhesion formation has significantly improved over the past two decades, literature has yet to fully explain the pathogenesis and etiology of post-surgical adhesions. As a result, finding an ideal preventative strategy and leveraging appropriate tissue engineering strategies has proven to be difficult. Different products have been developed and enjoyed various levels of success along the translational tissue engineering research spectrum, but their clinical translation has been limited. Herein, we comprehensively review the agents and products that have been developed to mitigate post-operative adhesion formation. We also assess emerging strategies that aid in facilitating precision and personalized medicine to improve outcomes for patients and our healthcare system.

Polymer Hernia Repair Materials: Adapting to Patient Needs and Surgical Techniques

Biomaterials and their applications are perhaps among the most dynamic areas of research within the field of biomedicine. Any advance in this topic translates to an improved quality of life for recipient patients. One application of a biomaterial is the repair of an abdominal wall defect whether congenital or acquired. In the great majority of cases requiring surgery, the defect takes the form of a hernia. Over the past few years, biomaterials designed with this purpose in mind have been gradually evolving in parallel with new developments in the different surgical techniques. In consequence, the classic polymer prosthetic materials have been the starting point for structural modifications or new prototypes that have always strived to accommodate patients’ needs. This evolving process has pursued both improvements in the wound repair process depending on the implant interface in the host and in the material’s mechanical properties at the repair site. This last factor is important considering that this site—the abdominal wall—is a dynamic structure subjected to considerable mechanical demands. This review aims to provide a narrative overview of the different biomaterials that have been gradually introduced over the years, along with their modifications as new surgical techniques have unfolded.

[Existing and forward-looking ways to prevent adhesions in IPOM hernia repair. A research overview]

IPOM intraperitoneal hernia repair, in comparison with other abdominal wall reconstruction methods, has a number of significant advantages. Among them are a reduction in operative time, low rate of surgical site infections, quick rehabilitation, and good cosmetic results. At the same time, one of the main constraining factors for its widespread use is the rather high frequency of adhesion formation between the implant and the abdominal organs. The first way to solve this serious problem is to improve the structure of the implant itself, and in the first place, its anti-adhesive layer. The second is the search for adjuvant tools that work in «problematic» areas, prone to adhesions formation, such as the points of implant fixation, its edges, or the areas of damage to antiadhesive layer due to a violation of the operative technique. It is desirable that they could exert their effect also in other parts of the abdominal cavity, which, despite the absence of a zone of «active» intervention, can also undergo adhesions. Based on this, the purpose of this review was to summarize modern data on the anti-adhesive activity of both composite implants and specialized membranes and liquid agents.

Adhesion Prevention to Polypropylene Meshes Using Combined Icodextrin Four Percent and Dimetindene Maleate

BACKGROUND

The use of surgical meshes in ventral hernia repair has significantly reduced hernia recurrence rates. However, when placed intraperitoneally prosthetic materials can trigger the development of peritoneal adhesions. The present experimental study evaluated the combined icodextrin 4% and dimetindene maleate treatment in preventing peritoneal adhesion formation to polypropylene and titanium-coated polypropylene meshes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty female white rabbits were divided into four groups. A 2 × 2 cm piece of mesh was fixed to intact peritoneum in all animals through a midline laparotomy. A lightweight polypropylene mesh was implanted in groups 1 and 2 and a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh in groups 3 and 4. Groups 2 and 4 were treated, intraoperatively, with intravenous dimetindene maleate (0.1 mg/kg) and intraperitoneal solution of icodextrin 4% (20 mL/kg) and for the next 6 d with dimetindene maleate intramuscularly. The observation period lasted 15 d. Adhesion scores, percentage of mesh affected surface, tissue hydroxyproline levels, and tissue histopathology were examined.

RESULTS

All animals in group 1 and 57% of animals in group 3 presented postoperative adhesions. The combination of antiadhesives significantly reduced the extent and severity of adhesions as well as the hydroxyproline levels in groups 2 and 4 compared with groups 1 and 3. On microscopic evaluation, animals in group 1 exhibited higher inflammation scores compared with group 2, whereas animals in groups 2 and 4 had better mesotheliazation compared with groups 1 and 3.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined administration of icodextrin 4% and dimetindene maleate reduces the extent and severity of adhesions and may be successfully used to prevent adhesion formation after mesh intraperitoneal placement.

Lightweight, Highly Permeable, Biocompatible, and Antiadhesive Composite Meshes for Intraperitoneal Repairs

Ventral hernia is a public health issue and millions of meshes are used to repair abdominal wall defects every year. Polypropylene-based composite meshes represent an important class of materials for intraperitoneal repair, but the meshes generally give rise to infection, seroma, migration, and adhesion, leading to severe consequence or even reoperation. Here, a facile and versatile one-way fabrication of lightweight, highly permeable, and biocompatible composite meshes with superior antiadhesion properties is proposed by modifying polypropylene meshes with well-defined polydopamine nanocoating. The resulting composite meshes are found to significantly enhance the biocompatibility and antiadhesion effect in rat model. The scalable production and excellent biomedical properties of composite meshes make them a promising candidate for future-generation ventral hernia repair materials.

* The New Zealand White Rabbit as a Model for Preclinical Studies Addressing Tissue Repair at the Level of the Abdominal Wall

In this report, we review the use of the New Zealand White rabbit as the experimental animal for several models of abdominal wall repair. For the repair of an abdominal wall defect, such as a hernia in clinical practice, multiple types of prosthetic material exist. Before their marketing, each of these biomaterials needs to be tested in a preclinical setting to confirm its biocompatibility and appropriate behavior at the different tissue interfaces. For preclinical trials, we have always used the New Zealand White rabbit as the model owing to its ease of handling and suitable size. This size allows for laparoscopic studies designed to follow the behavior in real time of a biomaterial implanted at the peritoneal interface, a delicate interface that often gives rise to complications in human practice. The size of the rabbit also offers a sufficiently large number of implant samples to be harvested for a complete battery of tests at several time points postimplant. In this review, we first describe the models established and then provide the results obtained so far using these models to test the different types of biomaterial. We end our review with a discussion of the clinical implications of these results.

Comparative study of Polypropylene versus Parietex composite®, Vicryl® and Ultrapro® meshes, regarding the formation of intraperitoneal adhesions

PURPOSE

To compare the polypropylene mesh (Marlex®) to Vicryl®, Parietex composite® and Ultrapro® meshes to assess the occurrence of adhesions in the intraperitoneal implantation.

METHODS

Sixty Wistar rats were allocated into three groups: PP+V, in which all the animals received a polypropylene and a Vicryl® mesh; PP+PC, with the implantation of polypropylene and Parietex composite® meshes and PP+UP, in which there was implantation of polypropylene and Ultrapro®. Macroscopic analysis was performed 28 days later to assess the percentage of mesh area affected by adhesion.

RESULTS

in the PP+ V group, the Vicryl® mesh showed lower adhesion formation (p=0.013). In the PP+PC, there were no differences between polypropylene and Parietex composite® (p=0.765). In the PP+UP group, Ultrapro® and polypropylene meshes were equivalent (p=0.198) .

CONCLUSION

All the four meshes led to adhesions, with the Vicryl® mesh showing the least potential for its formation.

Sepramesh and postoperative peritoneal adhesions in a rat model

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to investigate the safety and the anti-postoperative peritoneal adhesion (PPA) characteristics of Sepramesh^® (Davol), a composite mesh made of polypropylene covered with Seprafilm, when intraperitoneally placed in a rat model.

METHODS

Twenty male rats were randomized into a control group and a Sepramesh group. They underwent a primary surgical procedure aiming to induce a peritoneal injury in order to induce PPAs. In the Sepramesh group, the burnt peritoneum was covered with a 2-cm diameter disc of Sepramesh prosthesis. The mesh was fixed to the parietal peritoneum with four 3-0 absorbable stitches. PPAs were assessed during a second laparotomy 10 days later using quantitative and qualitative scoring systems.

RESULTS

There was no difference in terms of mean number of PPAs between both groups. All the rats from the control group developed PPAs. In the Sepramesh group, no adhesions were observed at the site of the injured peritoneum that had been covered with the Sepramesh prosthesis, but PPAs occurred at the extremities of the mesh, where there was close contact between polypropylene and viscera, or where the fixation sutures were placed. The severity and the type of adhesions were significantly higher in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that for the Sepramesh prostheses, the Seprafilm layer might be effective in PPA prevention, but damage caused by the section and fixation of Sepramesh should be limited in order to limit PPAs.

Altered mechanical interaction between rat plantar flexors due to changes in intermuscular connectivity

Connective tissue formation following muscle injury and remedial surgery may involve changes in the stiffness and configuration of the connective tissues linking adjacent muscles. We investigated changes in mechanical interaction of muscles by implanting either a tissue-integrating mesh (n = 8) or an adhesion barrier (n = 8) to respectively increase or decrease the intermuscular connectivity between soleus muscle (SO) and the lateral gastrocnemius and plantaris complex (LG+PL) of the rat. As a measure of mechanical interaction, changes in SO tendon forces and proximal-distal LG+PL force differences in response to lengthening LG+PL proximally were assessed 1 and 2 weeks post-surgery. The extent of mechanical interaction was doubled 1 week post-implantation of the tissue-integrating mesh compared to an unaffected compartment (n = 8), and was more than four times higher 2 weeks post-surgery. This was found only for maximally activated muscles, but not when passive. Implanting the adhesion barrier did not result in a reduction of the mechanical interaction between these muscles. Our findings indicate that the ratio of force transmitted via myofascial, rather than myotendinous pathways, can increase substantially when the connectivity between muscles is enhanced. This improves our understanding of the consequences of connective tissue formation at the muscle boundary on skeletal muscle function.

Coated meshes for hernia repair provide comparable intraperitoneal adhesion prevention

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair with intraperitoneal mesh is associated with a certain degree of adhesion formation to the mesh. This experimental study examined the efficacy of several coated meshes for adhesion reduction.

METHODS

Five commercially available meshes with a layered coating were placed intraperitoneally in rats and followed up for 90 days: polypropylene and polyester meshes, both coated with absorbable collagen (Parietene Composite and Parietex Composite, respectively), and three polypropylene meshes respectively coated with absorbable omega-3 fatty acids (C-Qur Edge), absorbable cellulose (Sepramesh IP), and nonabsorbable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Intramesh T1). Uncoated polypropylene and collagen meshs (Parietene and Permacol, respectively) served as the control condition. Adhesions, incorporation, and tissue reaction were evaluated macro- and microscopically. Additionally, the development of the neoperitoneum was examined.

RESULTS

All the coated meshes performed equally well in terms of adhesion reduction. The collagen mesh performed comparably, but the uncoated polypropylene mesh performed significantly worse. The different coatings led to very differing degrees of inflammation. Ingrowth was observed only at the place of suture but was comparable for all the meshes except C-Qur Edge, which showed the weakest incorporation. Development of a neoperitoneum on the mesh surface occurred independently of whether an absorbable or nonabsorbable coating or no coating at all was present.

CONCLUSIONS

Commercially available meshes with a layered coating deliver comparable adhesion reduction. The physical presence of a layered coating between the intraperitoneal content and the abdominal wall seems to be more important than the chemical properties of the coating in adhesion formation.

Current strategies and future perspectives for intraperitoneal adhesion prevention

INTRODUCTION

The formation of peritoneal adhesions still is a relevant clinical problem after abdominal surgery. Until today, the most important clinical strategies for adhesion prevention are accurate surgical technique and the physical separation of traumatized serosal areas. Despite a variety of barriers which are available in clinical use, the optimal material has not yet been found.

DISCUSSION

Mesothelial cells play a crucial physiological role in friction less gliding of the serosa and the maintenance of anantiadhesive surface. The formation of postoperative adhesions results from a cascade of events and is regulated by various cellular and humoral factors. Therefore, optimization or functionalization of barrier materials by developments interacting with this cascade on a structural or pharmacological level could give an innovative input for future strategies in peritoneal adhesion prevention. For this purpose, the proper understanding of the formal pathogenesis of adhesion formation is essential. Based on the physiology of the serosa and the pathophysiology of adhesion formation, the available barriers in current clinical practice as well as new innovations are discussed in the present review.

The search for ideal hernia repair; mesh materials and types

Hernia surgery continues to draw the attention of surgeons, patients, and the industry. This strong interest has driven the establishment of professional medical societies with the sole purpose of furthering the understanding of hernias and hernia repair. In the more than 100 years of development, industry has played a major role in advancing the technology to perfect the performance of hernia repair with the hope of establishing the "best" technique and its associated technology. However, with the development of newer prosthetics and approaches to hernia repair, many surgeons do not fully understand the properties of the available prosthetics. The goal of this review is to highlight the different types of meshes in an effort to clarify to surgeons what types of materials are available to them and how to select an appropriate one for a given case.