A case of autoimmune retinopathy associated with thyroid carcinoma

Electrodiagnostic Biomarkers in Paraneoplastic Retinopathy

OBJECTIVE

Paraneoplastic retinopathy (PNR) is a rapid-onset photoreceptor and post-photoreceptor dysfunction triggered by a cross-reaction between antigens expressed by the underlying tumour and retinal proteins. The present study aims to determine the electrodiagnostic biomarkers that support the diagnosis of PNR and evaluate the effect of treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective observational case-controlled study including 25 patients with suspected PNR, of which 11 patients were diagnosed with PNR. The presence of PNR was confirmed based on clinical examination, supported by colour fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence imaging, optical coherence tomography, fluorescein angiography, retinal vessel oximetry, colour test, full-field electroretinogram (ffERG), on-/off ERG, S-cone ERG, and multifocal ERG (mfERG). The relationships between the clinical symptomatology and the effect of therapy were evaluated.

RESULTS

All PNR patients (Nr: 11) presented with subjective symptoms of newly reported central vision or visual field deterioration. Posterior segment findings showed a severe patchy-like retinal atrophy, attenuation of the retinal vessels, and a waxy optic disc. Optical coherence tomography revealed a discontinued ISe line, and multiple hyperreflective foci. Retinal vessel oxygen saturation was increased. Multifocal ERG revealed reduced central and paracentral responses and ffERG severely attenuated scotopic-, photopic-, on-/off- and S-cone responses. The colour vision test revealed a tritan-tetartan-weakness. Two of the PNR patients underwent rituximab therapy with no further progression and even recovery of electrodiagnostic responses.In 1 nPNR (non-paraneoplastic retinopathy) patient (total Nr: 14) pseudoxanthoma elasticum-related retinopathy was the reason for impaired vision. In 3 of 13 patients with bronchopulmonary cancer a MEK- and FGFR-inhibitor- drug toxicity was the reason for the visual deterioration.

CONCLUSION

Careful investigation for signs of central and/or peripheral visual field deterioration must be performed in the presence of history of a co-existing malignancy. The possibility of PNR should be taken into account. The electrodiagnostic biomarkers, suggested in this study, may help to promptly recognise PNR and also to evaluate the effect of implemented therapy.

Paraneoplastic vision loss

Paraneoplastic vision loss, which represents a small percentage of paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes, can be a blinding disease. Presenting visual symptoms are variable, making diagnosis challenging. History of the presenting illness, ocular examination, and utilization of various modalities, such as automated perimetry, ocular coherence tomography, and electroretinogram allow for localization of vision loss to the optic nerves or retina, guiding in diagnosis and management. Paraneoplastic vision loss is often painless, bilateral, and subacute, and accompanies other neurologic symptoms but can be the first presenting symptom. Paraneoplastic optic neuropathy has been described in association with several antibodies, but most commonly anti-CRMP5. Cancer-associated retinopathy is the most common paraneoplastic autoimmune retinopathy; however, melanoma-associated retinopathy and bilateral diffuse uveal melanocytic proliferation have also been described to be associated with a paraneoplastic process affecting the retina. Paraneoplastic visual loss is an expanding field and advances in research have improved phenotypic characterization; however, further work is needed to identify more reliable biomarkers of disease and to better understand the underlying mechanisms and management.

Ocular Paraneoplastic Syndromes: A Critical Review of Diffuse Uveal Melanocytic Proliferation and Autoimmune Retinopathy

Background: Dozens of paraneoplastic syndromes affect the visual system ranging from conjunctival pemphigoid to encephalopathy of the occipital cortex. The most profiled ocular syndromes are bilateral diffuse uveal melanocytic proliferation (BDUMP) and the autoimmune retinopathies.Purpose: To review the critical features of these 2 entities then concentrate on advancements in treatment made within the last 10 years.Study Design: Literature review with structured data abstraction.Results: Major insights into pathogenesis have been wanting. Plasmapheresis appears to improve vision in a substantial proportion of patients with BDUMP. The number of clinical variables that influence visual outcome in paraneoplastic retinopathies combined with the variety of local and systemic treatment options makes interpretation of clinical effectiveness difficult.Conclusions: The rarity of these disorders makes randomized clinical trials unlikely. It may be time for a clinical professional organization to use a modified Delphi method to establish a consensus algorithm for the diagnosis and management of retinal paraneoplastic syndromes to augment clinical communications and clinical trials.

Rituximab for non-infectious Uveitis and Scleritis

Purpose

To provide a comprehensive review of rituximab use for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis and scleritis.

Methods

Review of literature through December 2020.

Results

Individual data was available for 229 patients with refractory non-infectious uveitis (n = 108) or scleritis (n = 121) who received treatment with rituximab (RTX). Rituximab was generally utilized as third-line or later treatment (uveitis: 67/90, 74.4%; scleritis: 90/96, 93.8%) at a mean of 33.5 months following the diagnosis of uveitis (range = 0 to 168.0 months; median = 24.0 months) and 39.4 months after diagnosis of scleritis (range = 1.0 to 168.0 months; median = 21.0 months). Patients with non-infectious uveitis and scleritis either received prior treatment with corticosteroids only (uveitis: 18/90, 20%; scleritis: 4/94, 4.3%), or with one (uveitis: 19/90, 21.1%; scleritis: 30/94, 31.9%), two (uveitis: 11/90, 12.2%; scleritis 27/94, 28.7%), or three or more (uveitis: 37/90, 41.1%; scleritis: 31/94, 33.0%) corticosteroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents with or without corticosteroids before initiation of RTX treatment. The rheumatologic protocol (two infusions of 1 gram of RTX separated by 14 days) was utilized most frequently (uveitis: 45/87, 51.7%; scleritis: 87/114, 76.3%), followed by the Foster protocol (eight weekly infusions of 375 mg/m² RTX; uveitis: 18/87, 20.7%; scleritis: 10/114, 8.8%), and the oncologic protocol (four weekly infusions of 375 mg/m² RTX; uveitis: 5/87, 5.7%; scleritis: 6/114, 5.3%). Various other off-label regimens were used infrequently (uveitis: 19/87, 21.8%; scleritis 11/114, 9.6%). Rituximab treatments resulted in a positive therapeutic response for the majority of patients with non-infectious uveitis (81/97, 83.5%). Commonly treated uveitic diagnoses included non-paraneoplastic autoimmune retinopathy (30/107, 28.0%), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (21/107, 19.6%), Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (12/107, 11.2%), and Behçet disease (11/107, 10.3%). Cases of non-infectious scleritis were most commonly attributed to granulomatosis with polyangiitis (75/121, 62.0%) and rheumatoid arthritis (15/121, 12.4%), and showed an even greater rate of positive therapeutic response (112/120, 93.3%) following RTX treatment. No side effects were reported in 76.3% (74/97) of uveitis and 85.5% (71/83) scleritis cases. Of those cases associated with RTX-induced adverse events, the most common were infusion reactions of various severity (11/35, 31.4%).

Conclusions

Overall, RTX appeared to be both effective and well-tolerated as second or third-line therapy for patients with non-infectious uveitis and scleritis.

Paraneoplastic ocular syndrome: a pandora's box of underlying malignancies

Paraneoplastic syndromes affecting the visual system are a group of conditions that arise in the systemic malignancy framework. In this review, we have provided a detailed and comprehensive overview of the published literature on the various ophthalmic paraneoplastic manifestations. A systematic review of many databases has been performed to identify ample literature on the paraneoplastic syndromes related to ophthalmology. We have discussed here the clinical features, pathogenesis, and treatment strategies of various ophthalmic paraneoplastic syndromes. It can be challenging to distinguish these disorders from their non-paraneoplastic counterparts and to determine the appropriate systemic assessment for the tumour responsible, to have a proper approach towards the management of the syndrome. METHOD: We searched PubMed, Science Direct and Journal of Ophthalmology for studies published in English between 1995 and April 2020, incorporating the general search term "paraneoplastic ocular syndrome" with connecting terms relevant to subheadings-e.g. Key search terms were cancer-associated retinopathy, (CAR), melanoma-associated retinopathy, (MAR), paraneoplastic retinopathy, autoimmune retinopathy, autoimmune-related retinopathy, and optic neuropathy, (ARRON), acute zonal occult outer retinopathy, (AZOOR), paraneoplastic vitelliform maculopathy, paraneoplastic vitelliform retinopathy, bilateral diffuse uveal melanocytic proliferation, (BDUMP), paraneoplastic optic neuropathy, (PON), polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclona gammopathy, and skin changes syndrome (POEMS) and various other terms. References from identified studies have been reviewed and included if deemed appropriate, valid, and scientifically important. If referenced in a selected English paper, we contemplated papers in other languages too. We preferentially selected papers that have been published in the last 10 years, but we have included relevant older references.

An update on autoimmune retinopathy

Autoimmune retinopathy (AIR) refers to a group of rare autoimmune retinal degenerative diseases presumably caused by cross-reactivity of serum autoantibodies against retinal antigens. The pathogenesis of AIR remains largely presumptive and there are a significant number of antiretinal antibodies that have been detected in association with AIR. The diagnosis of AIR is largely based on the demonstration of antiretinal antibodies in the serum along with suggestive clinical features and ancillary investigations. A high index of suspicion along with early diagnosis and treatment may play a critical role to lower the risk of irreversible immunological damage to the retinal cells in these patients. A multi-disciplinary approach for complete management and evaluation is helpful in such conditions. Various therapeutic options have been described for the treatment of AIR, though there is no consensus on standard treatment protocol.

Correlation of Immunological Markers with Disease and Clinical Outcome Measures in Patients with Autoimmune Retinopathy

Purpose

To determine if immunological markers (1) are significantly different between autoimmune retinopathy (AIR) patients and controls and (2) correlate with disease progression in AIR patients.

Methods

We enrolled patients with a possible AIR diagnosis, as well as control participants without eye disease, autoimmunity, or cancer. Immunological markers were tested in all participants. In addition, AIR patients had up to three blood draws for testing over their disease course. For AIR patients, clinical measures, including visual acuity (VA) and Goldmann visual field (GVF) area, were recorded at each draw. We used the Mann-Whitney U test to compare the immunological markers between AIR patients and controls. We used multilevel mixed-effect regression to investigate the correlation between markers and clinical parameters over time in AIR patients.

Results

Seventeen patients with AIR and 14 controls were included. AIR patients had a higher percent of monocytes (Z = 3.076, P = 0.002). An increase in immunoglobulin G against recoverin was correlated with a VA decrease (β = 0.0044, P < 0.0001). An increase in monocyte proportion was correlated with a decrease in GVF area (β = -7.27, P = 0.0021). Several markers of B-cell depletion were correlated with GVF improvement.

Conclusions

Monocytes may play a role in AIR pathophysiology and be a disease activity marker. B-cell depletion markers correlated with clinical parameter improvement, particularly GVF.

Translational Relevance

This work elucidates immunologic markers that may improve the accuracy of diagnosis and treatment of AIR.

Rituximab for autoimmune retinopathy: Results of a Phase I/II clinical trial

PURPOSE:

This prospective study evaluates whether rituximab is a safe and potentially effective treatment for nonparaneoplastic autoimmune retinopathy (npAIR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Five npAIR patients were enrolled in a Phase I/II, prospective, nonrandomized, open-label, single-center study. All patients received a cycle of 1000 mg intravenous rituximab at weeks 0 and 2, with a second cycle of rituximab 6 to 9 months later. Clinical evaluation was performed at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks after each rituximab cycle, and then every 3 months for a total duration of 18 months. The primary outcome for this study was treatment success based on visual field and full-field electroretinography at 6 months. The secondary outcomes included treatment success at months 12 and 18, drug-related adverse events, changes in visual symptoms, and changes in quality of life.

RESULTS:

Two patients met criteria for treatment success: one based solely on electroretinography and the other based solely on visual field area, but treatment success was not sustained. Clinical response over the course of the 18-month study showed disease stabilization in three patients and treatment failure in two patients. There were no severe drug-related adverse events.

CONCLUSION:

This is the first clinical trial prospectively evaluating the effect of rituximab in npAIR and, although rituximab was well tolerated, there was no clear-cut clinical improvement conferred by B cell depletion with rituximab.

Testicular Seminoma Presenting with Bilateral Blindness: Looking Beyond the Eye

Cancer-associated retinopathy (CAR) is a rare cause of vision loss that was first reported in 1976. It is reported that the retinopathy associated with cancer occurs due to antibodies against the tumor antigens that cross-react with retinal cell layers. We present the case of a young male who came to the emergency department with sudden onset of bilateral vision loss. He had a large-sized testicular seminoma with metastatic retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy. Several primary ophthalmological and systemic conditions were considered. He had multiple, positive anti-retinal antibodies. The cancer was felt to be the cause of the vision loss based on the clinical presentation and the presence of anti-retinal antibodies. He was treated with intravenous steroids, plasmapheresis, and curative chemotherapy, but there was no improvement in vision. Unfortunately, he died due to multiorgan failure. Our case is the second on seminoma-associated retinopathy in the literature.

Cancer-Associated Retinopathy and Treatment with Intravenous Immunoglobulin Therapy. A Seldom Used Approach?

Purpose: To report a case of cancer-associated retinophaty (CAR) treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IGIV) and review the use of IGIV in the treatment of CARMethods: Case report: A 68-year-old woman, former smoker, presented with bilateral subacute decreased visual acuity with 1 month of evolution, without other symptoms. Clinical examination revealed retinal atrophy and a mild vitritis component. Treatment with corticosteroid and IGIV was initiated empirically with the stabilization of visual loss. Anti-recoverin antibodies tested positive and a small cell lung carcinoma was diagnosed. In a review of the literature, we found that only 12 cases of patients treated with intravenous immunoglobulins have been reported.Conclusions: the early use of IVIG could contribute to an improvement and/or stabilization of visual symptoms in this patient group due to its rapid effect and lower profile of adverse effects when administered with chemotherapy.

Case Series of Cancer-associated Retinopathy (CAR)

Cancer-associated retinopathy (CAR) is a rare paraneoplastic disorder of the retina leading to blindness, associated with multiple cancers. It can lead to rapid progressive visual deterioration with retinal pathology ranging from retinitis pigmentosa to retinal degeneration. It is caused by antibodies directed against retinal antigens. This uncommon syndrome is a remote effect, independent of the primary tumor or metastatic lesion. We describe two cases of CAR, as well as pathophysiology, clinical manifestation, diagnostic criteria, and treatment of cancer-associated retinopathy.

Unilateral cancer-associated retinopathy: diagnosis, serology and treatment

PURPOSE

To report a case of unilateral cancer-associated retinopathy (CAR) with clinical, serological and electroretinogram (ERG) normalization after aggressive cancer treatment combined with steroids and rituximab.

METHODS

Work-up included extensive clinical and electrophysiological testing. Also, serological work-up for antiretinal antibodies and oncological screening was organized.

RESULTS

A 45-year-old female presented with progressive photopsias, photophobia and relative central scotoma in the right eye since 6 weeks prior. BCVA was 1.0 in both eyes. Biomicroscopy, IOP and fundus exam were unremarkable. Also, colour vision, autofluorescence imaging, OCT and EOG were normal. Visual fields showed decreased central sensitivity in the right eye. ERG showed a unilateral, electronegative combined and ON-bipolar response. A diagnosis of CAR was suspected. After a diagnosis of an adenocarcinoma of the right ovary, radical ovariectomy and hysterectomy were performed, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. A whole-body PET scan revealed no metastasis. Treatment with rituximab monoclonal antibodies in combination with corticosteroids was initiated. The patient tested positive for serum autoantibodies against TRPM1, a transient receptor potential cation channel expressed in ON-bipolar cells. During treatment, there was progressive improvement in symptoms and the ERG normalized. Serology confirmed complete clearance of autoantibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

Although rare, unilateral CAR does occur and in cases with high clinical suspicion an oncological work-up is mandatory. Aggressive cancer treatment combined with steroids and rituximab can lead to normalization of the clinical and ERG phenotype, with clearing of antiretinal antibodies.

Outcomes in Autoimmune Retinopathy Patients Treated With Rituximab

PURPOSE

To evaluate clinical and ancillary testing, including adaptive optics, outcomes in autoimmune retinopathy (AIR) patients treated with rituximab.

DESIGN

Retrospective, interventional case series.

METHODS

patients: Sixteen AIR patients treated with rituximab.

OBSERVATION PROCEDURES

All patients were treated with a loading and maintenance dose schedule of intravenous rituximab. Visual acuity (VA), electroretinography (ERG), and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) and visual field (VF) results were recorded. A subset of patients was also imaged using adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (AO-SLO).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Rates of VA change before vs after rituximab initiation were compared with mixed-model linear regression.

RESULTS

The rate of visual decline was significantly less after rituximab initiation compared with the rate of visual decline prior to rituximab initiation (P = .005). Seventy-seven percent of eyes had stable or improved VA 6 months after rituximab initiation. Amplitudes and implicit times on ERG, mean deviation on VF, central subfield mean thickness, and total macular volume did not decrease to a significant degree over the rituximab treatment period. Six eyes had serial AO-SLO imaging. Cone densities did not change significantly over the treatment period.

CONCLUSION

VA was stable or improved in a majority of AIR patients while they were being treated with rituximab. OCT and ERG parameters, as well as AO-SLO cone densities, were stable during treatment. Studies with additional patients and longer follow-up periods are needed to further explore the utility of rituximab in the management of AIR.

Efficacy of rituximab in non-paraneoplastic autoimmune retinopathy

Background

Autoimmune retinopathy (AIR) is a rare but potentially blinding condition that is often underdiagnosed. Common features in AIR presentation include rapidly progressive vision loss with abnormal electrophysiological responses of the retina associated with positive anti-retinal antibodies. AIR is also challenging to treat, and thus, the introduction of new potential therapeutic agents is welcomed. The goal of this communication is to assess the effects of rituximab infusions on electroretinogram (ERG) responses and visual function outcomes in patients with non-paraneoplastic autoimmune retinopathy (npAIR).

Results

Following infusion(s), three out of five patients showed no evidence of disease progression or improved, while two patients continued to progress on ERG. One patient demonstrated improvement in visual acuity (2 lines) in both eyes. ERG responses provided objective monitoring of patients’ visual function and response to immunosuppression over time.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that patients with npAIR unresponsive to other immunosuppression therapies may benefit from rituximab infusion, although stabilization rather than improvement was more frequently the outcome in our case series. Furthermore, regularly scheduled ERG follow-up examinations are recommended for monitoring patients’ progression during treatment.

B Cell Anomalies in Autoimmune Retinopathy (AIR)

Purpose

Autoimmune retinopathy (AIR) is a retinopathy associated with unexplained vision loss presumably linked to circulating antiretinal antibodies; currently, however, there are no standardized criteria regarding the diagnosis, treatment strategy, or pathogenesis of this disease. The importance of B-lymphocyte immunophenotyping in the classification of AIR is unknown.

Methods

We utilized 15-color multiparametric flow cytometry to identify aberrations in B cell subsets that may contribute to the pathophysiology of AIR. Luminex cytokine analysis was also performed on plasma samples from AIR patients.

Results

Significant differences in AIR patients compared to individuals with other inflammatory conditions or healthy donors were found in the B cell memory compartment, including an increase in naïve B cells and a decrease in switched and unswitched memory B cells, which correlated with alterations in immunoglobulin secretion.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that the maturation process of B cells may be impaired and that B cell immunophenotyping may help in understanding disease process in AIR.

Impact of Autoantibodies against Glycolytic Enzymes on Pathogenicity of Autoimmune Retinopathy and Other Autoimmune Disorders

Autoantibodies (AAbs) against glycolytic enzymes: aldolase, α-enolase, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, and pyruvate kinase are prevalent in sera of patients with blinding retinal diseases, such as paraneoplastic [cancer-associated retinopathy (CAR)] and non-paraneoplastic autoimmune retinopathies, as well as in many other autoimmune diseases. CAR is a degenerative disease of the retina characterized by sudden vision loss in patients with cancer and serum anti-retinal AAbs. In this review, we discuss the widespread serum presence of anti-glycolytic enzyme AAbs and their significance in autoimmune diseases. There are multiple mechanisms responsible for antibody generation, including the innate anti-microbial response, anti-tumor response, or autoimmune response against released self-antigens from damaged, inflamed tissue. AAbs against enolase, GADPH, and aldolase exist in a single patient in elevated titers, suggesting their participation in pathogenicity. The lack of restriction of AAbs to one disease may be related to an increased expression of glycolytic enzymes in various metabolically active tissues that triggers an autoimmune response and generation of AAbs with the same specificity in several chronic and autoimmune conditions. In CAR, the importance of serum anti-glycolytic enzyme AAbs had been previously dismissed, but the retina may be without pathological consequence until a failure of the blood–retinal barrier function, which would then allow pathogenic AAbs access to their retinal targets, ultimately leading to damaging effects.

Thyroid malignancy presenting with visual loss: an unusual case of paraneoplastic retinopathy

Paraneoplastic retinopathy is a rare cause of painless vision loss, associated with an underlying (and often occult) systemic malignancy. Ocular examination findings are subtle, and the diagnosis is often made on the basis of electrophysiology findings. This report describes the case of a 48-year-old Caucasian man with paraneoplastic retinopathy presenting as visual disturbance, central scotomata and abnormal electrophysiology. He was subsequently diagnosed with papillary thyroid malignancy.

Systemic paraneoplastic vasculitis secondary to papillary carcinoma of the thyroid

Systemic vasculitis secondary to thyroid carcinomas is exceptional. We report the case of a 55-year-old woman who presented with systemic vasculitis involving leucocytoclastic cutaneous vasculitis and renal disorders secondary to papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Her symptoms resolved completely after total thyroidectomy. Other causes of vasculitis were excluded. To our knowledge, this is only the second case reported of systemic vasculitis associated with PTC in a paraneoplastic manner.

Electroretinographic improvement after rituximab therapy in a patient with autoimmune retinopathy

Purpose

To describe the effect of rituximab on full-field electroretinography (ERG) in a patient with nonparaneoplastic autoimmune retinopathy (npAIR).

Observations

A 58-year-old male patient with visual complaints, positive anti-retinal antibodies and negative work-up for cancer was diagnosed with npAIR. Visual acuity and ancillary tests were normal except abnormal ERG in both eyes. The patient was given one course of rituximab 375 mg/m²/week for 4 weeks and cyclophosphamide 1 gr/m²/month for 6 months. A second course of rituximab was necessary as autoantibody titers showed no change and as new antibodies were noted after treatment with rituximab and cyclophosphamide. Electroretinography was repeated after the first course of rituximab, after cyclophosphamide, and the second course of rituximab therapy.

Conclusions and importance

Rituximab therapy led to marked improvement in full-field ERG readings and regression of symptoms was reported by the patient after rituximab infusions. The effect of rituximab in npAIR was objectively demonstrated with ERG.

Autoimmune retinopathy

PURPOSE

To provide a detailed review of current clinical guidelines for the diagnosis, work-up and treatment of autoimmune retinopathy and to preview briefly possible future therapies.

DESIGN

Perspective based on literature review and clinical expertise.

METHODS

Interpretation of current literature, relying on the authors' clinical experience.

RESULTS

Autoimmune retinopathy is a rare immunologic disease characterized by the presence of circulating antiretinal antibodies along with electroretinographic and visual field abnormalities. An ophthalmic examination can be normal or show minimal findings. The diagnosis of autoimmune retinopathy is made difficult by diagnostic criteria that are both limited and nonstandardized. Currently, the diagnosis is made based on the demonstration of serum antiretinal antibodies and the presence of clinical manifestations (including abnormal electroretinographic findings). The mere presence of these antibodies is not diagnostic. Lack of an accepted gold standard for antiretinal antibodies detection and poor interlaboratory concordance make the diagnosis challenging. There are anecdotal reports of immunosuppressive therapy in autoimmune retinopathy; however, the response to treatment is variable, with more favorable results achieved in paraneoplastic retinopathy, particularly cancer-associated retinopathy, with a combination of chemotherapy and immunosuppression. Whether an earlier attempt to treat nonparaneoplastic autoimmune retinopathy would be more beneficial is unknown. Early treatment attempts are limited by lack of sensitive and specific assays and definitive clinical criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Little is known about the clinical course, prognosis and treatment of autoimmune retinopathy. Additional studies should examine the specificity and pathogenicity of antiretinal antibodies and screen for biomarkers, and they should be conducted concurrently with studies seeking to identify appropriate treatment.

Autoimmune retinopathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Autoimmune retinopathy (AIR) is an immune-mediated disorder characterized by progressive visual loss, abnormal electroretinographic and visual field findings in the presence of circulating anti-retinal antibodies. This review highlights advances made toward understanding the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and trends in the management of AIR.

RECENT FINDINGS

The pathophysiology of AIR is likely antibody-mediated. AIR serum autoantibodies are variable in their size and retinal tissue they target and can also be present in healthy controls and multiple autoimmune diseases. Rarely, AIR may be associated with dysregulated self-tolerance mechanisms in the thymus. Despite progress in research, our understanding of AIR remains incomplete. Lack of standardized methods for anti-retinal antibody testing continues to challenge the interpretation of seropositivity. Conventional immunosuppressives have been further studied, and promising immunomodulatory therapies, such as targeted B-cell therapy, have been introduced. Newer imaging modalities such as fundus autofluorescence and spectral domain optical coherence tomography may be helpful in diagnosis, monitoring progression of disease and response to treatment.

SUMMARY

AIR is a rare but vision-threatening disease whose pathogenesis is poorly defined. Lack of standardized clinical or laboratory criteria further complicates the diagnosis and management. Despite recent progress, further basic science research into the autoimmune process is needed. Prospective controlled clinical trials with immunomodulatory therapy can help define future treatment paradigms.

[Panuveitis associated with papillary carcinoma of the thyroid]

Ocular involvement secondary to thyroid carcinomas is uncommon. Uveal metastasis may occur. More rarely, they can be responsible for paraneoplastic syndromes. We report the case of a 64-year-old woman who presented with a severe bilateral panuveitis with venous vasculitis associated with hyperthyroidism from a multinodular goiter, complicated by papillary carcinoma. Systemic steroid therapy was initiated; ocular symptoms resolved completely after total thyroidectomy. Other causes of panuveitis with venous vasculitis were ruled out. This is the first reported case of panuveitis associated with papillary thyroid carcinoma. The occurrence of the ocular symptoms with hyperthyroidism and their remission after surgery supports the possibility that this association may not be coincidental. A paraneoplastic phenomenon is suspected.

Intravitreal triamcinolone for cancer-associated retinopathy refractory to systemic therapy

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to report the use of intravitreal triamcinolone for treatment of cancer-associated retinopathy (CAR) refractory to systemic therapy.

Methods

This was a retrospective chart review study.

Results

A 67-year-old man presented with cancer-associated retinopathy with antibodies against a 46-kDa retinal protein, alpha enolase. There was disease progression despite therapy with mycophenolate and intravenous immunoglobulin. Serial intravitreal injections of triamcinolone resulted in restoration of photoreceptor anatomy on optical coherence tomography and visual improvement. The patient’s vision was preserved at 20/40 OD and 20/32 OS until his death from lung cancer 31 months after CAR diagnosis.

Conclusions

Intravitreal triamcinolone may be beneficial for maintenance of vision in patients with CAR.