Progestagen component in combined hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women and breast cancer risk: a debated clinical issue

PGRMC1 in animal breast cancer tissue and blood is associated with increased tumor growth with norethisterone in contrast to progesterone and dydrogesterone: four-arm randomized placebo-controlled xenograft study

Progesterone receptor membrane component 1 (PGRMC1) is mediating strong breast cancer cell proliferation induced by certain synthetic progestogens which we have shown within already published in vitro studies. Aim was now to use an animal model, to compare tumor growth using progesterone and its isomer dydrogesterone with norethisterone, which elicited in our in vitro studies the strongest proliferating effect. For the first time, we wanted to investigate if growth can be correlated both with blood concentrations and tissue expression of PGRMC1 to identify if PGRMC1 could be a new tumor marker. Prospective, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled four-arm study (45-50 days); PGRMC1-transfected or empty-vector T47D- and MCF7-xenotransplants were each treated with estradiol (E2) +placebo; E2 + progesterone; E2 + norethisterone; E2 + dydrogesterone; blood PGRMC1 assessed by a novel ELISA, tissue expression by immunohistochemistry. PGRMC1-transfected tumors further increased with E2 + norethisterone but not with E2-dydrogesterone or E2-progesterone. In both PGRMC1-xenograft groups (T47D, MCF7) with E2/norethisterone, the blood concentrations and tissue expression of PGRMC1 were higher than in all other 14 groups (p < .05), with positive significant correlation between blood PGRMCI concentrations and tissue PGRMC1 expression. In the presence of PGRMC1, certain progestogens could increase the growth of breast tumor, which now also should be tested in clinical studies.

Hormonal and Growth Regulation of Epithelial and Stromal Cells From the Normal and Malignant Endometrium by Pigment Epithelium-Derived Factor

We discovered that pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF)-null mice have endometrial hyperplasia, the precursor to human type I endometrial cancer (ECA), which is etiologically linked to unopposed estrogen (E2), suggesting that this potent antiangiogenic factor might contribute to dysregulated growth and the development of type I ECA. Treatment of both ECA cell lines and primary ECA cells with recombinant PEDF dose dependently decreased cellular proliferation via an autocrine mechanism by blocking cells in G1 and G2 phases of the cell cycle. Consistent with the known opposing effects of E2 and progesterone (Pg) on endometrial proliferation, Pg increases PEDF protein synthesis and release, whereas E2 has the converse effect. Using PEDF luciferase promoter constructs containing two Pg and one E2 response elements, E2 reduced and Pg increased promoter activity due to distal response elements. Furthermore, E2 decreases and Pg increases PEDF secretion into conditioned media (CM) by both normal endometrial stromal fibroblasts (ESFs) and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), but only CM from ESFs mediated growth-inhibitory activity of primary endometrial epithelial cells (EECs). In addition, in cocultures with primary EECs, Pg-induced growth inhibition is mediated by ESFs, but not CAFs. This is consistent with reduced levels of Pg receptors on CAFs surrounding human malignant glands in vivo. Taken together, the data suggest that PEDF is a hormone-regulated negative autocrine mediator of endometrial proliferation, and that paracrine growth inhibition by soluble factors, possibly PEDF, released by ESFs in response to Pg, but not CAFs, exemplifies a tumor microenvironment that contributes to the pathogenesis of ECA.

Deciphering the divergent roles of progestogens in breast cancer

Most breast cancers are driven by oestrogen receptor-α. Anti-oestrogenic drugs are the standard treatment for these breast cancers; however, treatment resistance is common, necessitating new therapeutic strategies. Recent preclinical and historical clinical studies support the use of progestogens to activate the progesterone receptor (PR) in breast cancers. However, widespread controversy exists regarding the role of progestogens in this disease, hindering the clinical implementation of PR-targeted therapies. Herein, we present and discuss data at the root of this controversy and clarify the confusion and misinterpretations that have consequently arisen. We then present our view on how progestogens may be safely and effectively used in treating breast cancer.

A higher aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage incidence in women prior to menopause: a retrospective analysis of 4,895 cases from eight hospitals in China

BACKGROUND

Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) from a ruptured cerebral aneurysm is a devastating disease. Despite the risk factors, including hypertension, cigarette smoking and alcohol use, are more common in men, aneurysmal SAH belongs to a few diseases which the incidence is higher in women than in men. Sex hormones, especially estrogen, might be protective against this condition. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) seems to be associated with a reduced risk for aneurysmal SAH. This study aims to know the prevalence of aneurysmal SAH of men and women at different ages.

METHODS

The age and gender information of 4,895 case of aneurysmal SAH (3,016 females, 1,879 males) were collected retrospectively from eight institutions in mainland China. The prevalence of aneurysmal SAH of men and women at different ages was analyzed.

RESULTS

The data showed women had a higher incidence of aneurysmal SAH than men starting at late thirties, and men might have a higher incidence of aneurysmal SAH than women only before 37-year-old.

CONCLUSIONS

Menopause may not be the only dominant factor causing higher incidence of aneurysmal SAH in women than in men.

Menopausal hormone therapy and menopausal symptoms

A majority of women will experience bothersome symptoms related to declining and/or fluctuating levels of estrogen during their menopausal transition. Vasomotor symptoms, vaginal dryness, poor sleep, and depressed mood have all been found to worsen during the menopausal transition. While vasomotor symptoms gradually improve after menopause, the time course can be many years. Vaginal dryness does not improve without treatment, while the long-term course of sleep and mood deterioration is not clearly defined at this time. A small minority of women have vasomotor symptoms that persist throughout the remainder of their lives. These common menopausal symptoms all improve with estrogen treatment. Over the last 10 years, we have witnessed a dramatic reduction in enthusiasm for menopausal hormone therapy, despite its high efficacy relative to other treatments. We have also seen the emergence of sound, evidence-based clinical trials of non-hormonal alternatives that can control the common menopausal symptoms. Understanding the natural history of menopausal symptoms, and the risks and benefits of both hormonal and non-hormonal alternatives, helps the clinician individualize management plans to improve quality of life.

Effects of short-term estradiol and norethindrone acetate treatment on the breasts of normal postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate among postmenopausal women the effects of a 3-month treatment with estradiol (E2) alone or in combination with norethindrone acetate (NA) on expression of hormone receptors and proliferation in the breast as well as on lipids and climacteric symptoms.

METHODS

Sixty healthy postmenopausal women were computer-randomized into two groups, with one group receiving 1 mg of E2 and the other group receiving 1 mg of E2 and 0.5 mg of NA daily for 12 weeks. Before and after treatment, middle-needle biopsies were obtained for histology and investigation of the expression levels of estrogen receptors (ERs; ER-α and ER-β), progesterone receptors (PRs; PR-A and PR-B), androgen receptor (AR), the proliferation marker Ki67, and collagen. Climacteric symptoms were recorded, and serum was collected to measure lipoprotein levels.

RESULTS

Fifty-six women finished the 12-week study. Proliferating cells (Ki67-positive) were very rare in all but a few of the untreated women. There were proliferating cells in both E2- and E2/NA-treated groups; however, these were not widespread and limited to nests of cells that amounted to 2% of the total epithelial cells. Some of these nests were positive for human epithelial growth factor receptor 2. Treatments caused no marked changes in the expression of ER-α, ER-β, or AR. However, both treatments resulted in an increase in PR-A and PR-B expressions. The presence of collagen was clearly associated with a mammographic diagnosis of dense breasts, but neither hormone treatment affected breast density. Both E2 and E2/NA treatments were effective in relieving hot flashes and sweating without adverse effects on blood pressure, weight, and liver, kidney, and thyroid functions. A decrease in cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was induced by E2/NA but not by E2.

CONCLUSIONS

This short-term prospective study shows that E2 and estrogen-progestogen treatment can up-regulate PRs but do not significantly affect ERs, AR, proliferation, or breast density.

2-methoxyestradiol binding of GPR30 down-regulates angiotensin AT(1) receptor

Controlling angiotensin AT1 receptor function has been shown to be protective for many pathophysiological disorders. Although estrogen metabolite, 2-methoxyestradiol (2ME2) can down-regulate angiotensin AT1 receptor expression independently of nuclear receptors, no specific cellular targets have been identified. This study was focused on identification and validation of a cellular target responsible for 2ME2-mediated angiotensin AT1 receptor down-regulation in a continuously passaged rat liver epithelial cell line. Cell membranes were isolated and used to determine 2ME2 specific binding. Cell membranes exposed to [(3)H]2ME2 showed specific saturable binding, which was found to be pertussis toxin (PTx) sensitive. Under similar conditions, G-protein coupled receptor 30 (GPR30) agonist (G1) and antagonist (G15) inhibited 2ME2 specific binding. In these cells GPR30 was found localized to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membranes. In intact cells, G1 down-regulated angiotensin AT1 receptor expression and this effect was reversed by G15. Furthermore, 2ME2 mediated activation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) followed by ERK1/2 phosphorylation, an essential signaling step in angiotensin AT1 receptor down-regulation, was abrogated by G15, suggesting that this signal is GPR30 dependent. Additionally, EGF was found to independently down-regulate angiotensin AT1 receptor in an ERK1/2-dependent manner. In summary, our results demonstrate for the first time that 2ME2 down-regulation of angiotensin AT1 receptor is dependent on ER membrane-associated GRP30. Moreover, this effect is facilitated by GPR30 dependent transactivation of EGFR and ERK1/2 phosphorylation. This study provides further understanding of the physiological significance of 2ME2 and its role in modulating angiotensin AT1 receptor expression.

Perspective on hormone therapy 10 years after the WHI

The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) hormone trials are among the most influential and debated research studies in women's health in recent medical history. This year (2013) marked the 10th anniversary of the publication of the WHI results and this past decade has been nothing less than revolutionary. We have witnessed a transformative evolution in our understanding of, and in the practice of, menopause management and herein summarize the strides the field has traversed over the past 10 years.

Changing concepts: Menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer

Hormone therapy is still used by millions of women for menopausal symptoms. Concerns regarding hormone therapy and breast cancer were initially based on case reports and retrospective case-control studies. However, recent results from large prospective cohort studies and the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) randomized placebo-controlled hormone therapy trials have substantially changed concepts regarding how estrogen alone and estrogen plus progestin influence breast cancer. The preponderance of observational studies suggested that estrogen alone and estrogen plus progestin both increased the risk of breast cancer, with cancers commonly diagnosed at an early stage. However, substantially different results emerged from the WHI randomized hormone therapy trials. In the WHI trial evaluating estrogen plus progestin in postmenopausal women with an intact uterus, combined hormone therapy statistically significantly increased the risk of breast cancer and hindered breast cancer detection, leading to delayed diagnosis and a statistically significant increase in breast cancer mortality. By contrast, estrogen alone use by postmenopausal women with prior hysterectomy in the WHI trial did not substantially interfere with breast cancer detection and statistically significantly decreased the risk of breast cancer. Differential mammography usage patterns may explain differences between observational study and randomized trial results. In clinical practice, hormone therapy users have mammograms more frequently than nonusers, leading to more and earlier stage cancer detection. By contrast, in the WHI randomized trials, mammogram frequency was protocol mandated and balanced between comparison groups. Currently, the different effects of estrogen plus progestin vs estrogen alone on breast cancer are not completely understood.

How to judge the association of postmenopausal hormone therapy and the risk of breast cancer

The relevance of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) for breast cancer risk has been long debated, although it is one of the most important barriers for women to accept HT. Various opinions have been reported from recent randomized clinical trials and epidemiological studies. These unanswered questions include: whether HT has a positive impact on breast cancer; whether risks of therapy with unopposed estrogen and combined estrogen-progestin are different; and whether different types and routes of estrogen and progestogens, as well as the duration and cessation of HT use, have different impacts on this disorder. Recently, there has been some good news such as the following: the currently available data do not provide sufficient evidence to prove a causal relationship between postmenopausal HT and breast cancer; breast cancer in postmenopausal women using HT usually has better prognosis than that of nonusers. In conclusion, HT is still the most effective method of relieving climacteric symptoms for many postmenopausal women. However, a possible risk of breast cancer associated with long-term HT usage should not be ignored. With respect to prevention of breast cancer, regular evaluation of individual breast cancer susceptibility and close follow-up through mammography and/or breast sonography are necessary strategies for the safety of HT use.