Is TRAP-6 suitable as a positive control for platelet reactivity when assessing response to clopidogrel?

Impact of ABO Blood Group on Thromboembolic and Bleeding Complications in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices

BACKGROUND

 The ABO blood group system is linked to hemostasis via its relationship with von Willebrand factor (VWF) and factor VIII (FVIII). In the current study, we investigated the association of the ABO system with clinical outcomes as well as VWF and platelet function in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs).

METHODS

 Bleeding and thromboembolic complications were assessed in 111 patients during 1 year after LVAD implantation. In 67 LVAD patients, VWF antigen, VWF activity, VWF ristocetin cofactor, VWF collagen-binding, and FVIII activity were assessed. Platelet surface P-selectin and activated glycoprotein IIb/IIIa were determined by flow cytometry, and soluble P-selectin was measured with an enzyme-linked immunoassay. Platelet aggregation was assessed by light transmission and impedance aggregometry.

RESULTS

 Thirty-six patients (32.4%) experienced a bleeding and 22 patients (19.8%) a thromboembolic event. In univariate analyses, patients with blood group O had numerically more bleeding complications and less thromboembolic events as compared to patients with blood group non-O (both p ≥ 0.05). After multivariable adjustment, blood group O was significantly associated with a higher risk of bleeding (hazard ratio 2.42 [95% confidence interval 1.03-5.70], p = 0.044) but not linked to thromboembolic complications.

CONCLUSION

 Patients with blood group O had significantly lower levels of VWF and FVIII (all p < 0.05), whereas P-selectin expression in response to thrombin-receptor activating peptide and soluble P-selectin were higher as compared to patients with blood group non-O (both p < 0.05). LVAD patients with blood group O are at an increased bleeding risk, potentially due to lower VWF and FVIII levels.

Time from blood draw to multiple electrode aggregometry and association with platelet reactivity

Results from multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) may vary according to pre-analytic factors. This study aimed to analyze the association of time from blood draw to MEA in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In this observational single-center cohort study, platelet aggregation (aggregation units, U) was quantified by MEA (Multiplate Analyzer) after stimulation with adenosine diphosphate (ADP; final concentration [Fc] 6.4 μM), thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP; Fc 32 μM), or arachidonic acid (AA; Fc 0.5 mM) in patients treated with ASA and clopidogrel following PCI. High on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (HPR) was defined as ADP-induced platelet aggregation ≥ 46 U. The manufacturer recommends performing the analysis within 30-180 min after blood draw. Patients were grouped according to the time from blood draw to MEA: 30-180 min, < 30 min, or > 180 min. Platelet function of 273 patients with coronary artery disease undergoing PCI with dual antiplatelet therapy was analyzed. The median age was 72 years (interquartile range, IQR 62-79) and 179 (66%) were male. Median ADP-, TRAP-, and AA-induced aggregation was 25 (IQR 18-36) U, 79 (IQR 63-96) U, and 12 (IQR 7-18) U, respectively. For those analyzed within 30-180 min from blood draw, no significant correlation of time from blood draw to MEA was observed 1) ADP (r = - 0.04, p = 0.51); 2) TRAP (r = - 0.06, p = 0.32); 3) AA (r = - 0.03, p = 0.67). In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and treated with dual antiplatelet therapy, the time from blood draw to multiple electrode aggregometry does not correlate with ADP- induced aggregation when the measurement occurred within the recommended time interval of 30-180 min after blood draw.

Impact of body size on platelet function in patients with acute coronary syndrome on dual antiplatelet therapy

INTRODUCTION

Patients undergoing acute percutaneous coronary intervention receive dual antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention. Recurrent myocardial infarction or bleedings are possibly due to under- or overdosing of antiplatelet therapy in relation to body size.

METHODS

We correlated residual platelet aggregation with body mass index, body surface area, lean body mass and blood volume in 220 patients on prasugrel (n = 121) or ticagrelor (n = 99).

RESULTS

Platelet aggregation outside the recommended window was recorded in 85 patients, but not correlated with any of the body indices.

CONCLUSION

Body size does not affect platelet response to prasugrel or ticagrelor at the guideline-recommended fixed dosages.

Polysaccharide-protein complex from coelomic fluid of Dendrobaena veneta earthworm exerts a multi-pathway antiplatelet effect without coagulopathy and cytotoxicity

There is a pressing need to identify novel antiplatelet agents, an alternative to acetylsalicylic acid and thienopyridines, to broaden the prevention of cardiovascular events, the leading cause of global morbidity and mortality. Invertebrate coelomocytes structurally and functionally resemble the thrombocyte-like cells of vertebrates; therefore, the coelomic fluid in which they are suspended may contain agents controlling their clumping abilities. However, whether coelomocytes-free coelomic fluid may also affect human platelet activities was not a subject of any study. This study aimed to screen the in vitro antiplatelet and anticoagulant activities of the polysaccharide-protein complex from Dendrobaena veneta coelomic fluid (25-100 µg/mL) (PPC-DV). All tested fluid concentrations induced significant (42.4-52.5%) inhibition of adenosine-5'-diphosphate (ADP)-induced aggregation of human platelets at a level comparable to that of 140 µmol/L acetylsalicylic acid. Its relevant antiplatelet effect (27.2-45.9%) was also evidenced in the thrombin receptor-activating peptide-6 (TRAP-6) assay. Moreover, 50 and 100 µg/mL of PPC-DV inhibited arachidonic acid-inducible aggregation. No coagulopathic or cytotoxic effects of PPC-DV were observed. The study indicates that PPC-DV, at a concentration of at least 50 µg/mL, exerts a favorable antiplatelet effect by targeting at least three pathways (P2Y₁₂ receptor, cyclooxygenase-1, and protease-activated receptor-1), justifying further experimental and clinical investigations on its use in cardiovascular disease prevention.

A Prospective Observational Study on Multiplate®-, ROTEM®- and Thrombin Generation Examinations Before and Early After Implantation of a Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD)

Background

Heart failure patients are frequently on coagulation-active medications before LVAD implantation and perioperative bleeding is a frequent complication after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. The role of point-of-care coagulation tests in assessing bleeding risk for LVAD implantation and the early postoperative time course of these tests is not well established.

Methods

We prospectively enrolled 25 patients with terminal heart failure undergoing LVAD implantation. Study related TRAP-, ASPI- and ADP- tests of Multiplate^® platelet aggregometry, ROTEM^® rotational thromboelastometry (INTEM, EXTEM, FIBTEM), thrombin generation assay and conventional laboratory studies were measured at 11 predefined time-points during the first 21 postoperative days. We examined if preoperative TRAP-, ASPI-, ADP- and ROTEM values are correlated with estimated total blood loss (primary outcome parameter) during the first 21 days after LVAD implantation and compared the baseline values of these measurements between patients with a bleeding event to those without. We performed Spearman's correlation and non-parametric tests for paired and non-paired comparisons.

Results

7 out of 25 (28%) patients experienced a bleeding event of which 4 required surgical revision. Of the preoperatively performed measurements the TRAP test [Spearman's Rho (ρ) = −0.5, p = 0.01], INTEM CFT (ρ = 0.72, p < 0.001), INTEM alpha (−0.7, p < 0.001), EXTEM MCF (ρ = −0.63; p < 0.001), EXTEM alpha (ρ = −0.67; p < 0.001), FIBTEM MCF (ρ = −0.41; p = 0.042), Fibrinogen (Clauss) (ρ = −0.5; p = 0.011), Anti-thrombin activity (ρ = −0.49; p = 0.013) and platelet count (ρ = −0.42; p = 0.034) were significantly correlated to total blood loss. Patients undergoing a surgical bleeding revision had significantly reduced values in TRAP—[31.5 IQR (17.25–43.5U) vs. 69 IQR (52.5–87U); p = 0.004], ASPI—[16.5 IQR (5.5–35.7U) vs. 39 IQR (24.5–62.5U); p = 0.038], ADP—[30 IQR (22–69U) vs. 12.5 IQR (8.7–21.5U); p = 0.01], EXTEM MCF—[63 IQR (57.7–63.7) vs. 67 IQR (65–75.5); p = 0.019] and EXTEM alpha [74 IQR (68.75–74) vs. 79 IQR (78–80.5); p = 0.002] values before LVAD implantation.

Conclusion

Multiplate^® and ROTEM^® measurements before LVAD implantation may identify LVAD candidates with platelet dysfunction and alterations of the primary hemostasis and could guide anesthetists and intensive care practitioners in bleeding risk stratification and in the perioperative clinical management.

Sex-specific platelet activation through protease-activated receptor-1 in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1-mediated platelet activation may vary according to sex and clinical situation. In order to investigate sex-specific platelet activation through PAR-1, we assessed platelet response to thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP) in 562 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization without (Group 1A) and with (Group 1B) acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Subsequently, we sought to confirm our findings in 287 patients undergoing elective (Group 2A) or acute (Group 2B) percutaneous coronary intervention.

METHODS

TRAP-stimulated platelet surface expression of P-selectin and activated glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) were measured by flow cytometry in Group 1. Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) in response to TRAP were assessed in Group 2.

RESULTS

In Group 1A, platelet activation in response to TRAP was significantly higher in women compared to men (P-selectin: 511 MFI [443-597 MFI] vs. 471 MFI [393-552 MFI]; GPIIb/IIIa: 84 MFI [58-119 MFI] vs. 70 MFI [47-103 MFI]; both p ≤ 0.002). In contrast, in Group 1B, TRAP-stimulated P-selectin and activated GPIIb/IIIa were similar in men and women (both p ≥ 0.3). Likewise, TRAP-stimulated platelet aggregation was significantly higher in female patients in Group 2A (LTA: 66% [54-76%] vs. 51% [41-65%]; MEA: 78 AU [66-107 AU] vs. 62 AU [52-88 AU]; both p ≤ 0.02), whereas men and women in Group 2 B had similar platelet aggregation (p = 0.5). The occurrence of ischemic endpoints did not differ significantly between men and women in Group 1A and Group 1B.

CONCLUSIONS

Platelet PAR-1 signaling is more pronounced in women than in men without ACS. In ACS, however, PAR-1-mediated platelet activation is similar in male and female patients.

Platelet activation and aggregation in different centrifugal-flow left ventricular assist devices

Left-ventricular assist devices (LVADs) improve outcomes in end-stage heart failure patients. Two centrifugal-flow LVAD systems are currently approved, HeartMate 3 (HM3) and Medtronic/Heartware HVAD (HVAD). Clinical findings suggest differences in thrombogenicity between both systems. We compared markers of platelet activation and aggregation between HM3 and HVAD. We prospectively included 59 LVAD patients (40 HM3, 19 HVAD). Platelet P-selectin expression, activated glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa and monocyte-platelet aggregates (MPA) were assessed by flow-cytometry. Platelet aggregation was measured by light-transmission aggregometry (LTA) and multiple-electrode aggregometry (MEA). Von-Willebrand factor (VWF) antigen (VWF:Ag), VWF activity (VWF:Ac), and VWF multimer pattern analysis were determined. Soluble P-selectin (sP-selectin) was measured with an enzyme-linked immunoassay. P-selectin, GPIIb/IIIa and MPA levels in vivo and in response to arachidonic acid, adenosine diphosphate, and thrombin receptor activating peptide were similar between HM3 and HVAD (all p > .05). Likewise, agonist-inducible platelet aggregation by LTA and MEA did not differ between HM3 and HVAD (all p > .05). VWF:Ag levels and FVIII:C were similar between both systems (both p > .05), but patients with HVAD had significantly lower VWF:Ac (p = .011) and reduced large VWF multimers (p = .013). Finally, sP-selectin levels were similar in patients with HVAD and HM3 (p = .845). In conclusion, on-treatment platelet activation and aggregation are similar in HM3 and HVAD patients. Potential clinical implications of observed differences in VWF profiles between both LVAD systems need to be addressed in future clinical trials.

Residual platelet reactivity in low-dose aspirin-treated patients with class 1 obesity

BACKGROUND

Recent data suggest a decreased clinical efficacy of low-dose aspirin in patients weighing ≥70 kg. We therefore investigated the impact of body weight and class 1 obesity on thromboxane generation and platelet reactivity to arachidonic acid (AA) in 316 patients on dual antiplatelet therapy following angioplasty and stenting.

METHODS

Platelet surface expression of P-selectin and activated glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa in response to AA were determined by flow cytometry as sensitive markers of platelet activation. Urinary 11-dehydro-thromboxane B2 (11-dehydro-TXB2) and serum TXB2 were measured by commercially-available immunoassays. On-treatment residual AA-inducible platelet aggregation was assessed by light transmission aggregometry (LTA), the VerifyNow aspirin assay and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA).

RESULTS

Class 1 obesity was independently associated with increased platelet surface expression of P-selectin and activated GPIIb/IIIa, but not with urinary 11-dehydro-TXB2, serum TXB2, and on-treatment platelet aggregation by all assays. Of all measured parameters, only MEA showed a positive albeit very weak correlation with body weight (r = 0.13, p = 0.02). Furthermore, the results of all tests did not differ significantly between patients without and with a body weight ≥ 70 kg. After adjustment for age and diabetes by multivariate logistic regression analysis, the frequency of high-on treatment residual TXB2 generation and high on-treatment residual AA-inducible platelet reactivity (HRTG/HRPR) did not differ significantly between obese and non-obese patients.

CONCLUSION

Class 1 obesity is associated with enhanced platelet activation in response to AA in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy. This seems to be independent of cyclooxygenase-1 inhibition and does not translate into HRTG/HRPR.

Comparison of Light Transmission Aggregometry With Impedance Aggregometry in Patients on Potent P2Y12 Inhibitors

Since data on the agreement between light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) in patients on the more potent P2Y₁₂ inhibitors are missing so far, we investigated if the evaluation of the responsiveness to therapy by LTA can be replaced by MEA in 160 acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients on dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and prasugrel or ticagrelor (n = 80 each). Cut-off values for high on-treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) in response to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) or arachidonic acid (AA) were defined according to previous studies showing an association of HRPR with the occurrence of adverse ischemic outcomes. ADP- inducible platelet aggregation was 33% and 37% (P = 0.07) by LTA and 19 AU and 20 AU (P = 0.38) by MEA in prasugrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients, respectively. AA- inducible platelet aggregation was 2% and 3% by LTA and 15 AU and 16 AU by MEA, (all P ≥ 0.3) in patients on prasugrel and ticagrelor, respectively. By LTA, HRPR ADP and HRPR AA were seen in 5%/5% and in 4%/ 13% of patients receiving prasugrel- and ticagrelor, respectively. By MEA, HRPR ADP and HRPR AA were seen in 3%/ 25% and 0%/24% of prasugrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients, respectively. ADP-inducible platelet reactivity by MEA correlated significantly with LTA ADP in prasugrel-treated patients (r = 0.4, P < 0.001), but not in those receiving ticagrelor (r = 0.09, P = 0.45). AA-inducible platelet aggregation by LTA and MEA did not correlate in prasugrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients. Sensitivity/specificity of HRPR by MEA to detect HRPR by LTA were 25%/99% for MEA ADP and 100%/79% for MEA AA in prasugrel-treated patients, and 0%/100% for MEA ADP and 70%/83% for MEA AA in ticagrelor-treated patients. In conclusion, on-treatment residual ADP-inducible platelet reactivity by LTA and MEA shows a significant correlation in prasugrel- but not ticagrelor-treated patients. However, in both groups LTA and MEA revealed heterogeneous results regarding the classification of patients as responders or non-responders to P2Y₁₂ inhibition.

Platelet-to-lymphocyte and Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratios Predict Target Vessel Restenosis after Infrainguinal Angioplasty with Stent Implantation

Platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) and lymphocyte-to-monocyte (LMR) ratios are associated with the occurrence of critical limb ischemia in peripheral artery disease (PAD). We therefore investigated whether PLR, NLR or LMR are linked to target vessel restenosis (TVR) following infrainguinal angioplasty and stenting. Moreover, we studied on-treatment platelet reactivity and neutrophil-platelet aggregate (NPA) formation as potential underlying mechanisms. Platelet, neutrophil, lymphocyte and monocyte counts were determined one day after angioplasty and stenting in 95 stable PAD patients. Platelet reactivity and NPA formation in response to protease-activated receptor-1 stimulation were measured by light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and flow cytometry, respectively. PLR and NLR were significantly higher in patients who subsequently developed TVR (both p < 0.05). In contrast, LMR did not differ significantly between patients without and with TVR (p = 0.28). A PLR ≥ 91 and NLR ≥2.75 were identified as the best thresholds to predict TVR, providing sensitivities of 87.5% and 81.3%, and specificities of 34.9% and 50.8%, respectively, and were therefore defined as high PLR and high NLR. TVR occurred significantly more often in patients with high PLR and high NLR than in those with lower ratios (both p < 0.05). Patients with high PLR and high NLR exhibited significantly increased on-treatment platelet aggregation compared to those with lower ratios, and patients with high PLR had higher levels of NPA formation (all p < 0.01). In conclusion, PLR and NLR predict TVR after infrainguinal angioplasty with stent implantation. Platelet activation and neutrophil-platelet interaction may be involved in the underlying pathomechanisms.

Protease-activated receptor-mediated platelet aggregation in acute coronary syndrome patients on potent P2Y12 inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Despite the increasing use of potent P2Y12 inhibitors, further atherothrombotic events still impair the prognosis of many acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. This may in part be attributable to intact platelet aggregation via the human thrombin receptors protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1 and PAR-4.

OBJECTIVE

We studied PAR mediated platelet aggregation in ACS patients following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation in a cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Platelet aggregation to ADP as well as to the PAR-1 agonist SFLLRN and the PAR-4 agonist AYPGKF was assessed by multiple electrode aggregometry in 194 ACS patients on dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and either prasugrel (n = 114) or ticagrelor (n = 80) 3 days after PCI.

RESULTS

Based on the consensus cutoff value, high on-treatment residual platelet reactivity to ADP (HRPR ADP) was observed in only 2 prasugrel-treated patients. Both patients with HRPR ADP had also a normal response to SFLLRN and AYPGKF. Among the 112 prasugrel-treated patients with adequate P2Y12 inhibition, 50 patients (45%) still had a normal response to SFLLRN, and 70 patients (63%) still had a normal response to AYPGKF. Among the 80 ticagrelor-treated patients with adequate P2Y12 inhibition, 25 patients (31%) still had a normal response to SFLLRN, and 50 (63%) still had a normal response to AYPGKF.

CONCLUSION

Normal platelet aggregation via PAR-1 and PAR-4 is preserved in many patients with adequate P2Y12 inhibition by prasugrel and ticagrelor. The present findings may at least in part explain adverse ischemic events despite potent P2Y12 inhibition.

Platelet activation parameters and platelet-leucocyte-conjugate formation in glioblastoma multiforme patients

Patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) suffer from an increased incidence of vascular thrombotic events. However, key influencing factors of the primary hemostasis have not been characterized in GBM patients to date. Thus, the present study determines the activation level of circulating platelets in GBM patients, in-vitro reactivity to agonist-induced platelet stimulation and the formation of circulating platelet-leucocyte conjugates as well as the plasma levels of the proinflammatory lipid mediator sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P). The endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) was determined as global marker for hemostasis. The 21 GBM patients and 21 gender and age matched healthy individuals enrolled in this study did not differ in mean total platelet count. Basal surface expression of platelet CD63 determined by flow cytometry was significantly increased in GBM patients compared to controls as was observed for the concentration of soluble P-selectin in the plasma of GBM patients. While the ETP was not affected, the immunomodulatory lipid S1P was significantly decreased in peripheral blood in GBM. Interestingly, monocyte expression of PSGL-1 (CD162) was decreased in GBM patient blood, possibly explaining the rather decreased formation of platelet-monocyte conjugates. Our study reveals an increased CD63 expression and P-selectin expression/ secretion of circulating platelets in GBM patients. In parallel a down-modulated PSGL-1 expression in circulating monocytes and a trend towards a decreased formation of heterotypic platelet-monocyte conjugates in GBM patients was seen. Whether this and the observed decreased plasma level of the immunomodulatory S1P reflects a systemic anti-inflammatory status needs to be addressed in future studies.

Heat-shock protein 72 promotes platelet aggregation induced by various platelet activators in rats

Increase of thrombus in the coronary arteries is positively correlated with the level of heat-shock protein 72 (HSP72) in the blood of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Platelet aggregation participates in thrombus formation on ruptured plaque in AMI. In this study, we aimed to clarify the role of HSP72 in thrombus formation by evaluating the effects of HSP72 on platelet aggregation. Platelet aggregation activities were measured in platelet-rich plasma obtained from male Sprague-Dawley rats with or without the platelet activators, such as adenosine diphosphate (ADP), collagen, thrombin receptor-activating peptide-6 (TRAP-6), ristocetin, and arachidonic acid. Changes in aggregation were estimated by the co-addition of recombinant HSP72 and anti-HSP72 antibodies. Our results showed that addition of HSP72 increased platelet aggregation in the presence of low concentrations of ADP, collagen, TRAP-6, ristocetin, and arachidonic acid. Increased platelet aggregation stimulated by ADP and HSP72 was reduced by the co-addition of anti-HSP72 antibodies. Thus, these findings suggested that HSP72 was released extracellularly in response to stress, promoting thrombus formation and AMI. Additionally, treatment with anti-HSP72 antibodies may control platelet aggregation induced by extracellular HSP72.

Third generation P2Y12 antagonists inhibit platelet aggregation more effectively than clopidogrel in a myocardial infarction registry

The current standard of antiplatelet therapy of patients after myocardial infarction includes the P2Y12 receptor antagonists clopidogrel, prasugrel or ticagrelor. This study aimed to compare the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients after myocardial infarction. In a single-centre registry the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor was investigated by aggregometry in patients after myocardial infarction. To assess the overall capacity of platelet aggregation whole blood was induced with thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP; 32 μM). To specifically quantify the effect of P2Y12 antagonists, whole blood was stimulated with 6.4 μM adenosine diphophosphate (ADP). Relative ADP induced aggregation (r-ADP-agg) was defined as the ADP-TRAP ratio to reflect an individual degree of P2Y12-dependent platelet inhibition. Platelet function of 238 patients was analysed [clopidogrel (n=58), prasugrel (n=65), ticagrelor (n=115)]. The r-ADP-agg was 35 ± 14% for patients receiving clopidogrel, 28 ± 10% for patients receiving prasugrel and 26 ± 11% for patients receiving ticagrelor. The r-ADP-agg was significantly lower in patients treated with prasugrel (p=0.0024) or ticagrelor (p<0.0001) compared to clopidogrel. There was no significant difference between patients receiving prasugrel or ticagrelor (p=0.2559). In conclusion, prasugrel and ticagrelor provide a stronger platelet inhibition compared to clopidogrel in patients after myocardial infarction. No significant difference in platelet inhibition was detected between prasugrel and ticagrelor. (registry for patients after Myocardial Infarction Treated with AntiPlatelet agents; DRKS00003146).

Underlying mechanism and specific prevention of hemolysis-induced platelet activation

Thromboembolic complications significantly impair the outcome of hemolytic disorders. We hypothesized that red cell adenosine diphosphate (ADP) release results in significant platelet activation in hemolysis and that this prothrombotic state can be prevented by inhibition of the ADP P2Y₁₂ receptor. In the current study, we therefore sought to investigate the mechanism and inhibition of hemolysis-induced platelet activation. The expression of activated integrin αIIbß3 was determined by flow cytometry, and platelet aggregation was assessed by multiple electrode platelet aggregometry. We demonstrate platelet activation and increased platelet aggregation by adding hemolytic blood (lysates) to whole blood, similarly to that achieved by the platelet agonist ADP. Enhanced platelet activation and reactivity in the presence of hemolytic blood were significantly abolished by apyrase, which catalyzes ADP degradation, and inhibited by blockade of the platelet ADP P2Y₁₂ receptor with cangrelor. Platelets from patients treated with the ADP P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonist clopidogrel showed a reduced response to lysates compared to platelets from healthy controls without antiplatelet treatment. Further, in vitro blood group ABO incompatibility induced hemolysis and led to increased platelet activation. Finally, "spontaneous" platelet aggregation seen in patients with cold agglutinin disease was completely abolished by cangrelor. In conclusion, hemolysis is associated with increased platelet activation and aggregation due to red cell derived ADP, which can be prevented by ADP receptor blockade.

High platelet reactivity after P2Y12-inhibition in patients with atrial fibrillation and coronary stenting

High platelet reactivity (HPR) after P2Y12-inhibition in patients undergoing coronary stenting is associated with an increased risk for thromboembolic events and coronary death. So far it is not known how HPR affects the clinical outcome of different treatment strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing coronary stenting. In this single centre, observational study the antiplatelet effect of P2Y12-inhibitors in AF patients undergoing coronary stenting was investigated using impedance aggregometry. Patients received either dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) or triple therapy (TT). HPR was defined as the ratio of ADP-to TRAP-induced aggregation (r-ADP-agg) ≥50 %. Thromboembolic and bleeding events were assessed within the first 30 days after stenting. Out of 910 screened patients 167 patients were available for the present analysis. HPR was found in 5 of 43 (12 %) patients treated with DAPT and in 18 of 124 (15 %) patients treated with TT. In patients receiving TT, HPR was not a risk factor for thromboembolic events compared to patients with adequate response to P2Y12-inhibitors (6 vs. 8 %, p = 0.712). There was a trend for less bleeding events in patients with HPR compared to r-ADP-agg <50 % in the TT group (0 vs. 16 %, p = 0.077). Our data suggest that HPR after P2Y12-antagonism in patients receiving TT due to AF and coronary stenting might protect from bleeding without increasing thromboembolic risk. Future studies will need to investigate if patients with AF receiving coronary stenting benefit from a reduction of antithrombotic therapy.

The Ratio of ADP- to TRAP-Induced Platelet Aggregation Quantifies P2Y12-Dependent Platelet Inhibition Independently of the Platelet Count

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the association of clinical factors with P2Y12-dependent platelet inhibition as monitored by the ratio of ADP- to TRAP-induced platelet aggregation and conventional ADP-induced aggregation, respectively.

BACKGROUND

Controversial findings to identify and overcome high platelet reactivity (HPR) after coronary stent-implantation and to improve clinical outcome by tailored anti-platelet therapy exist. Monitoring anti-platelet therapy ex vivo underlies several confounding parameters causing that ex vivo platelet aggregation might not reflect in vivo platelet inhibition.

METHODS

In a single centre observational study, multiple electrode aggregometry was performed in whole blood of patients after recent coronary stent-implantation. Relative ADP-induced aggregation (r-ADP-agg) was defined as the ratio of ADP- to TRAP- induced aggregation reflecting the individual degree of P2Y12-mediated platelet reactivity.

RESULTS

Platelet aggregation was assessed in 359 patients. Means (± SD) of TRAP-, ADP-induced aggregation and r-ADP-agg were 794 ± 239 AU*min, 297 ± 153 AU*min and 37 ± 14%, respectively. While ADP- and TRAP-induced platelet aggregation correlated significantly with platelet count (ADP: r = 0.302; p<0.001; TRAP: r = 0.509 p<0.001), r-ADP-agg values did not (r = -0.003; p = 0.960). These findings were unaltered in multivariate analyses adjusting for a range of factors potentially influencing platelet aggregation. The presence of an acute coronary syndrome and body weight were found to correlate with both ADP-induced platelet aggregation and r-ADP-agg.

CONCLUSION

The ratio of ADP- to TRAP-induced platelet aggregation quantifies P2Y12-dependent platelet inhibition independently of the platelet count in contrast to conventional ADP-induced aggregation. Furthermore, r-ADP-agg was associated with the presence of an acute coronary syndrome and body weight as well as ADP-induced aggregation. Thus, the r-ADP-agg is a more valid reflecting platelet aggregation and potentially prognosis after coronary stent-implantation in P2Y12-mediated HPR than conventional ADP-induced platelet aggregation.

Impact of variables of the P-selectin - P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 axis on leukocyte-platelet interactions in cardiovascular disease

The formation of leukocyte-platelet aggregates (LPA), through the P-selectin - P-selectin glycoprotein ligand (PSGL)-1 axis, plays a pivotal role in atherothrombosis. In order to investigate the influence of platelet (pP-selectin) and soluble P-selectin (sP-selectin), and of variations in the genes encoding for P-selectin (SELP) and PSGL-1 (SELPLG) on LPA formation, we assessed monocyte (MPA)- and neutrophil-platelet aggregates (NPA) as well as pP-selectin by flow cytometry in 263 patients undergoing angioplasty and stenting. sP-selectin was determined by ELISA, the SELP Pro715 allele and the SELPLG Ile62 allele were determined by allele specific PCR. The Pro715 allele was significantly associated with lower levels of in vivo pP-selectin and sP-selectin, while agonists´ inducible pP-selectin was not influenced by the Pro715 allele. PP-selectin was significantly associated with MPA and NPA formation. The in vivo formation of MPA and NPA depended to 19 % and 7.4 %, respectively, on in vivo pP-selectin, irrespective of the Pro715 allele and the Ile62 allele carrier status. TRAP-6 inducible MPA and NPA depended to 34 % and 27 %, respectively, on TRAP-6 inducible pP-selectin, but were independent of the Pro715 allele carrier status. Carriers of the Ile62 allele showed a stronger correlation between TRAP-6 inducible pP-selectin and TRAP-6 inducible MPA/NPA than non-carriers. Furthermore, TRAP-6 inducible NPA were higher in Ile62 allele carriers, which suggests higher thrombin sensitivity. In conclusion, our findings point to the significant role of pP-selectin for MPA and NPA formation, while other variables like sP-selectin, the SELP Pro715 allele and the SELPLG Ile62 allele have less influence.

Sex differences of leukocyte-platelet interactions and on-treatment platelet reactivity in patients with atherosclerosis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate differences of platelet activation and on-treatment residual platelet reactivity between female and male patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

We compared P-selectin expression, activated glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa and leukocyte-platelet aggregates (LPA) by flow cytometry between 110 female and 206 male patients undergoing angioplasty and stenting. On-treatment residual platelet reactivity was determined by two test systems.

RESULTS

The expression of P-selectin and GPIIb/IIIa did not differ significantly between female and male patients. In contrast, females showed a significantly more pronounced formation of LPA in vivo, in response to thrombin receptor-activating peptide-6 and in response to adenosine diphosphate. Further, high LPA were seen more frequently in female patients. Finally, protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1 mediated platelet reactivity by both assays was significantly higher in females.

CONCLUSION

Female sex is associated with a more pronounced formation of LPA and increased PAR-1 mediated platelet reactivity in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Plasma viscosity, functional fibrinogen, and platelet reactivity in vascular surgery patients

BACKGROUND

Platelet reactivity changes with shear stress, which in turn depends on whole blood and plasma viscosity (PV). Platelets interact with fibrinogen during thrombus formation, and fibrinogen is a determinant of PV. The respective role of PV and fibrinogen on platelet function is still unclear.

METHODS

30 patients undergoing vascular surgery were admitted to this study. In each patient we measured PV using a cone-on-plate viscosimeter, functional fibrinogen using thromboelastometry, and platelet reactivity to thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP) stimulation using multi-electrode aggregometry. Routine coagulation parameter were measured.

RESULTS

At the univariate analysis, platelet reactivity was positively associated with mean platelet volume (R2 = 0.15, P = 0.033) and PV (R2 = 0.35, P = 0.0006), and negatively associated with serum bilirubin (R2 = 0.20, P = 0.013) and international normalized ratio (INR) (R2 = 0.19, P = 0.017). At the multivariable analysis, only PV (P = 0.001) and INR (P = 0.019) remained independent predictors of platelet reactivity.

CONCLUSION

PV is directly and independently associated with platelet reactivity, whereas functional fibrinogen is not. Aspirin treatment is inadequate to correct thrombin-induced platelet aggregation. In presence of hyperviscosity, patients at high cardiovascular risk, may benefit from more aggressive anti-platelet treatments.

A high ratio of ADP-TRAP induced platelet aggregation is associated more strongly with increased mortality after coronary stent implantation than high conventional ADP induced aggregation alone

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate whether a high relative ADP induced aggregation (r-ADP-agg) is associated with an increased mortality in patients after coronary stent implantation.

BACKGROUND

Several trials were not able to improve clinical outcome by adapting platelet inhibition in patients after coronary stent implantation and high platelet reactivity (HPR). Platelet monitoring is complex and conventional definition of adenosindiphosphate (ADP) induced aggregation alone might not transfer the whole picture of adequate platelet inhibition in vivo.

METHODS

In a prospective single-centre observational trial multiple electrode aggregometry was performed in whole blood of patients after stent implantation. r-ADP-agg was defined as the ADP-thrombin receptor activating peptide ratio to reflect an individual degree of P2Y12 dependent platelet inhibition with a cut-off value for HPR of ≥ 50%. The primary end point was mortality.

RESULTS

Follow-up was completed in 176 of 184 patients (96%) with a mean follow-up time of 3.7 years. 35 (20 %) patients revealed an r-ADP-agg ≥ 50%. An r-ADP-agg ≥ 50% was associated with an increased mortality [unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) 7.006 (2.561-19.17); p = 0.0001]. In a multivariable Cox regression analysis mortality was independently associated with an r-ADP-agg ≥ 50% [HR 3.324 (1.542-7.165); p = 0.0022], ACS-setting [HR 3.249 (1.322-7.989); p = 0.0102] and severely reduced LV function [HR 5.463 (2.098-14.26); p = 0.0005].

CONCLUSION

An r-ADP-agg ≥ 50% is associated with an increased mortality in patients after coronary stent implantation. Furthermore, r-ADP-agg might represent a better tool to predict clinical outcome than the conventional ADP induced platelet aggregation alone.

Human platelet protease-activated receptor-1 responsiveness to thrombin related to P2Y12 inhibition

Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor inhibitors significantly improves the outcome of patients with stable coronary heart disease. However, abundant thrombin generation, which is not influenced by this dual antiplatelet therapy, is a major reason for recurrent thromboembolic disease in these patients. We, therefore, assessed in a hypothesis generating study in patients with stable coronary artery disease specifically the relation of responsiveness of the platelet thrombin receptor protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1 to the magnitude of the inhibition of the ADP receptor. PAR-1 regulation was studied prospectively in 86 consecutive patients with stable coronary artery disease treated with aspirin and clopidogrel (67 patients) or prasugrel (19 patients) and correlated the data to ADP inducible platelet reactivity by impedance aggregometry. PAR-1 expression did not differ between patients on aspirin and clopidogrel vs patients on aspirin and prasugrel (P > 0.5). PAR-1 levels were correlated to P-selectin expression (P < 0.0001). The higher the PAR-1 expression the more profound was the in vitro thrombin-inducible platelet activation. However, neither ex vivo PAR-1 expression nor in vitro thrombin-inducible PAR-1 were correlated to ADP-inducible platelet aggregation (P > 0.5). Thus, like in a real life scenario, patients with stable ischemic heart disease on dual antiplatelet therapy may express high levels of PAR-1, which are associated with profound thrombin-inducible platelet activation. This responsiveness cannot be predicted by the magnitude of ADP responsiveness.

Response to antiplatelet therapy is independent of endogenous thrombin generation potential

BACKGROUND

Thrombin is the most potent platelet activator, and achieves rapid platelet activation even in the presence of antiplatelet therapy. Since activated platelets respond stronger to additional stimuli, the extent of endogenous thrombin generation may in part be responsible for the reported response variability to aspirin and clopidogrel therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thrombin generation potential was measured with a commercially available assay, and platelet reactivity was assessed with the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation assay, light transmission aggregometry (LTA), the VerifyNow aspirin and P2Y12 assays, and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) in 316 patients on dual antiplatelet therapy undergoing angioplasty and stenting.

RESULTS

Peak thrombin, the lag phase and the area under the curve of thrombin generation correlated poorly with on-treatment platelet reactivity by all test systems. High on-treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) in response to arachidonic acid was seen in 33 (10.5%), 41 (13%), and 79 (25.7%) patients by LTA, the VerifyNow aspirin assay, and MEA, respectively. HRPR in response to adenosine diphosphate was seen in 150 (48.1%), 48 (15.3%), 106 (33.7%), and 118 (38.3%) patients by the VASP assay, LTA, the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, and MEA, respectively. Peak thrombin generation did not differ between patients without and with HRPR by the VASP assay, LTA, the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and MEA. In the VerifyNow aspirin assay, patients without HRPR had higher peak thrombin generation than patients with HRPR (p=0.01). Finally, patients without and with high peak thrombin generation exhibited similar on-treatment platelet reactivity by all test systems, and high peak thrombin generation occurred to a similar extent in patients without and with HRPR.

CONCLUSION

Response to antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel is not associated with thrombin generation potential.

Effects of pantoprazole on dual antiplatelet therapy in stable angina pectoris patients after percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to prospectively assess the potential influence of pantoprazole therapy on the antiplatelet effects of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and clopidogrel (CLO) in stable angina pectoris (SAP) patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

Forty-four patients with SAP (CCS I-III) and successful PCI with stent implantation were enrolled into the study. The patients were divided into group proton pump inhibitors (PPI): 23 patients with indications for PPI (F/M = 9/14; age = 64 ± 9; standard therapy + 20 mg pantoprazole) and the control group (group C): 21 patients (F/M = 6/15; age = 64 ± 8; standard therapy). The platelet function analysis in whole blood based on impedance aggregometry (ASPI, COL, ADP, TRAP tests) using Multiplate--V2.02.11 was performed 18-24 h after the PCI + CLO loading dose (600 mg) and 30 days after PCI.

RESULTS

Both baseline patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were comparable between the study groups. There were no differences in the mean values of the platelets (PTL) tests measured at the 30(th) day after PCI between both groups (PPI vs. C: ASPI: 24.6 ± 10.0 vs. 42.1 ± 14.8 U, COL: 32.9 ± 8.6 vs. 34.0 ± 7.7 U, ADP: 26.8 ± 12.4 vs. 30.4 ± 8.1 U, TRAP: 78.7 ± 16.6 vs. 78.1 ± 22.6 U, p = ns). The mean delta values of the PTL tests (18-24 h post-PCI/30 days post-PCI) were also comparable between the groups. The PTL aggregometry results were related to time (ADP, ASPI, TRAP vs. time, p = 0.001; COL vs. time, p = 0.03)--the baseline values of ADP, ASPI, COL and TRAP tests were smaller than those measured after the one-month observation.

CONCLUSION

Pantoprazole treatment does not impair the efficacy of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with SAP after PCI.

Residual platelet activation through protease-activated receptors (PAR)-1 and -4 in patients on P2Y12 inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and thienopyridines has improved outcomes of patients after coronary stent implantation. However, current knowledge suggests that thrombin generation is not affected by inhibition of the P2Y12 receptor, and therefore, platelet activation may still occur.

METHODS

The response to agonists specific for protease-activated receptors (PAR)-1 and -4 was tested by multiple electrode impedance aggregometry in 82 patients on stable doses of clopidogrel or prasugrel, and in 55 healthy controls.

RESULTS

Based on the consensus cut-off value for adenosine diphosphate (ADP) responsiveness, only one out of 19 patients on prasugrel, but 22 out of 63 patients on clopidogrel had high on-treatment residual platelet reactivity in response to exogenous ADP (p=0.01). Among the patients with adequate ADP P2Y12 receptor inhibition (n=59), we still observed 32 patients (54.2%) with normal response to the PAR-1 activator SFLLRN (26 patients on clopidogrel, 81.2%; 6 patients on prasugrel, 18.8%), and 37 patients (63.8%) with a normal response to the PAR-4 activator AYPGKF (29 patients on clopidogrel, 78.4%; 8 patients on prasugrel, 21.6%). The degree of PAR-agonists inducible platelet activation was directly correlated with the activation induced by ADP (r>0.5 and p<0.001 for both agonists). Moreover, SFLLRN and AYPGKF inducible platelet reactivities were strongly correlated (r=0.75, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

PAR responsiveness is preserved in the majority of patients with adequate clopidogrel-mediated inhibition of the platelet P2Y12 receptor, and still in about 20% of those with adequate inhibition by prasugrel.

Protease activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) mediated platelet aggregation is dependent on clopidogrel response

INTRODUCTION

Clopidogrel inhibits ADP mediated platelet aggregation through inhibition of the P2Y12 receptor by its active metabolite. Thrombin induces platelet aggregation by binding to protease activated receptor-1 (PAR-1), and inhibition of PAR-1 has been evaluated in patients treated with clopidogrel to reduce ischemic events after acute coronary syndromes. Residual PAR-1 mediated platelet aggregation may be dependent on extent of clopidogrel response.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Platelet aggregation was measured in 55 patients undergoing elective PCI at 16-24 hours after 600 mg clopidogrel loading dose by light transmittance aggregometry using ADP 20 μM and thrombin receptor agonist peptide (TRAP) at 15 μM and 25 μM as agonists. Genomic DNA was genotyped for common CYP2C19 variants.

RESULTS

Increasing quartiles of 20 μM ADP induced platelet aggregation after clopidogrel loading were associated with increasing levels of TRAP mediated platelet aggregation. Patients in the highest quartile (clopidogrel non-responders) of post treatment ADP aggregation had significantly higher TRAP mediated aggregation than the patients in the lowest quartile (clopidogrel responders) [TRAP 15 μM: 79.6 ± 5% vs. 69.5 ± 8%, p<0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

Non-responders to clopidogrel show increased residual platelet aggregation induced by TRAP, whereas clopidogrel responders exhibit attenuated response to TRAP. Addition of PAR-1 antiplatelet drugs may be most effective in patients with reduced clopidogrel response and high residual TRAP mediated platelet aggregation.