The occurrence of second neoplasms after treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors for chronic myeloid leukemia

Drug-induced tumoral disease: A global pharmacovigilance database analysis

INTRODUCTION

Cancer remains a worldwide threat, having caused almost 10 million deaths in 2020. The American Cancer Society has identified both known and probable carcinogens, including commonly used drugs. The aim of this study is to describe the drugs most frequently reported in the occurrence of cancer.

METHODS

Among all individual case safety reports (ICSRs) in the global pharmacovigilance database VigiBase, we searched for the 50 most reported drugs with an adverse drug reaction term belonging to the query "Malignant or unspecified tumors" until June 30, 2023. Then, we extracted the disproportionality measurement data, information component (IC), and reporting odds ratio (ROR) in order to assess a disproportionality signal.

RESULTS

Among all ICSRs in VigiBase, 871,925 contained an ADR belonging to the SMQ "Malignant or unspecified tumors". Ranitidine was the drug with the most reported ADRs related to cancer (n=106,484), followed by lenalidomide (n=13,466), and etanercept (n=8014). The drugs with the highest IC were ranitidine (IC=5.2, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]=5.2-5.2), pioglitazone (1353 ICSRs, IC=4.2, 95% CI=4.2-4.2), and regorafenib (1272 ICSRs, IC=2.8, 95% CI=2.8-2.8).

DISCUSSION

Our results show that the main pharmacological mechanisms are associated with ranitidine (link with levels of N-nitrosodimethylamine in ranitidine-based drugs), gene-activating drugs (pioglitazone: link with agonist effects on PPAR-γ gene activation), various pharmacological families with immunosuppressive effects (protein kinase inhibitors, immunomodulators, azathioprine, etc.), certain types of protein kinase inhibitors whose oncogenic mechanisms remain unclear (regorafenib, sorafenib, imatinib, ibrutinib, etc.), and hormone antagonists (tamoxifen, letrozole). Special monitoring of patients exposed to these drugs may be required. Further studies are needed to assess the risk with certain drugs in this ranking.

Adverse effects of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in cancer therapy: pathophysiology, mechanisms and clinical management

Since their invention in the early 2000s, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have gained prominence as the most effective pathway-directed anti-cancer agents. TKIs have shown significant utility in the treatment of multiple hematological malignancies and solid tumors, including chronic myelogenous leukemia, non-small cell lung cancers, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and HER2-positive breast cancers. Given their widespread applications, an increasing frequency of TKI-induced adverse effects has been reported. Although TKIs are known to affect multiple organs in the body including the lungs, liver, gastrointestinal tract, kidneys, thyroid, blood, and skin, cardiac involvement accounts for some of the most serious complications. The most frequently reported cardiovascular side effects range from hypertension, atrial fibrillation, reduced cardiac function, and heart failure to sudden death. The potential mechanisms of these side effects are unclear, leading to critical knowledge gaps in the development of effective therapy and treatment guidelines. There are limited data to infer the best clinical approaches for the early detection and therapeutic modulation of TKI-induced side effects, and universal consensus regarding various management guidelines is yet to be reached. In this state-of-the-art review, we examine multiple pre-clinical and clinical studies and curate evidence on the pathophysiology, mechanisms, and clinical management of these adverse reactions. We expect that this review will provide researchers and allied healthcare providers with the most up-to-date information on the pathophysiology, natural history, risk stratification, and management of emerging TKI-induced side effects in cancer patients.

Long-Term Side Effects of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Most patients with chronic myeloid leukemia have deep and durable responses when treated with BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Imatinib (the first approved TKI), nilotinib, and dasatinib are used in newly diagnosed, relapsed or intolerant patients, while bosutinib and ponatinib are used only in relapsed or intolerant patients. Previously the drug of choice was related to the likelihood of response and, to a small extent, patient comorbidities. The long-term toxicities, particularly cardiopulmonary side effects, are now impacting treatment choice, making patient comorbidities of significant concern. About 10 % of patients do not tolerate their initial BCR-ABL1 TKI and an increasing number are developing long-term side effects, particularly with the second generation drugs. Side effects of the five drugs reviewed here highlight the differences between cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and endocrine toxicities, as well as possible second malignancies. There is increasing evidence that patients whose disease is controlled by TKI's will have greater impact on their quality of life from comorbidities or drug adverse events than from the disease itself. Research into management of long-term toxicities is needed.

CML as Part of Dual Malignancies-A Retrospective Analysis: Possible Mechanisms and Review of Literature

Introduction of imatinib has changed the outlook of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients with overall survival approaching general population. Long term survival in CML patients has provided an opportunity to better study natural history and long term complications of disease as well as the treatment modalities. To study the occurrence and association of other malignancies with their outcomes in patients with CML. This is a single centre retrospective study. All CML patients case records registered with haematology clinic of a tertiary care centre in North India from 2001 to 2014 were perused and evaluated for dual malignancies. Those patients with dual malignancies were personally examined and interviewed if alive. Out of 1677 patients, 15 cases had co-existent malignancies. Four of fifteen cases of dual malignancies had CML as secondary cancer. Three had synchronous and rest 12 patients had metachronous malignancies. Only one patient was in accelerated phase, rest all were in chronic phase. Median age of the dual malignancy cases was 50 years (25-66 years), much younger than reported in west. The initial dose of imatinib was 400 mg OD in all except one. We did not find any causal association between CML or imatinib therapy with development of secondary tumours. Interestingly in this series, incidence of CML as secondary or synchronous malignancy was higher than earlier published studies.

Occurrence of secondary malignancies in chronic myeloid leukemia during therapy with imatinib mesylate-single institution experience

Introduction

Imatinib mesylate (IM) remains the treatment of choice for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) showing a remarkable efficacy and offers a perspective for long disease-free survival. Due to prolonged administration of IM, the questions about the possible impact on the development of secondary malignancies (SM) are raised.

Objective

To investigate the incidence and clinical outcome of secondary malignancies during IM therapy for CML.

Material and Methods

The records of 221 CML patients treated with IM between 2003–2013 in a single institution were reviewed. The Poisson regression model was used to estimate the relative risks for SM and death in CML patients.

Results

Secondary malignancies developed in eight out of the 221 patients (3.6%) receiving IM for a median of 61 months (range, 10–137 months). Female/male ratio was 5/3. Two patients were diagnosed with their CML at accelerated phase whereas 6 had chronic phase. The median age at IM initiation was 58 years (range, 31–72 years). Five of these 8 SM patients received IM after other treatments failure: interferon α (n=5), hydroxyurea (n=4) and cytarabine (n=1). Three patients received IM as a frontline therapy. All patients were on IM at 400mg daily at SM occurrence. The therapy for SM included surgery (n=3), chemotherapy only (n=3), and chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy (n=1). One patient did not receive treatment due to disseminated disease. All CML patients were in hematologic and complete cytogenetic response (CCR) at the time of SM development. All of them also met the criteria for major molecular response (BCR-ABL^IS ≤0.1%). They continued their IM while receiving treatment for SM. Among eight patients with SM, five patients are alive and remain in CCR on IM whereas three patients died due to SM. The risks for SM development as well as death due to SM in CML patients were not statistically increased if compared to age-adjusted population.

Conclusions

The association between IM therapy for CML and SM development has not been found.