1
|
Küçükyurt S, Şahin K, Yılmaz U, Erçalışkan A, Özkan Tekin T, Ortaboz D, Elverdi T, Salihoğlu A, Ar MC, Öngören Ş, Başlar Z, Eşkazan AE. Diagnosis and Management of Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Curr Probl Cancer 2022; 46:100913. [PMID: 36399974 PMCID: PMC9554335 DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2022.100913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 09/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has brought life to a standstill globally. Intermittent quarantines were applied to control the pandemic and reduce contamination. During the pandemic, patients with hematological malignancies were among the most vulnerable population. Our aim was to compare in terms of demographic data, disease-related factors, symptom-to-diagnosis interval, diagnosis-to-treatment interval , and interim and end-of-treatment response in classical Hodgkin lymphoma patients diagnosed during the pandemic and in the pre-pandemic periods. A total of 90 patients were included, of which 65 and 25 were diagnosed in the 2 years before the pandemic and the 12-month period during the pandemic, respectively. Demographic features were comparable in both groups. Although the percentage of patients with advanced-stage disease was higher during the pandemic (64% vs 53.8%), this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.384). The median symptom-to-diagnosis interval was significantly longer during the pandemic than was observed within the pre-pandemic era (16 weeks vs 8 weeks, P = 0.042). The median diagnosis-to-treatment intervals was similar in both groups (13 days vs 15 days, P = 0.253). In the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods, 85.2% and 72.7% of the patients had complete response at end-of-treatment evaluation, respectively (P = 0.208). We found that symptom-to-diagnosis interval was significantly prolonged during the pandemic. Higher percentage of patients with advanced-stage disease during the pandemic might also be due to this delay, nevertheless, this difference did not reach to a significant difference regarding treatment response in both groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selin Küçükyurt
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Kübra Şahin
- Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Umut Yılmaz
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Abdülkadir Erçalışkan
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Tuba Özkan Tekin
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Damla Ortaboz
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Tuğrul Elverdi
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ayşe Salihoğlu
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Muhlis Cem Ar
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Şeniz Öngören
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Zafer Başlar
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Emre Eşkazan
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey,Correspondence to: Ahmet Emre Eşkazan, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ferhanoglu B, Kim TM, Karduss A, Brittain D, Tumyan G, Al-Mansour M, Zerga M, Song Y, Rivas-Vera S, Kwong YL, Lim ST, Yeh SP, Abdillah A, Huang Z, Dalal M, Wan H, Hertzberg M. Treatment pathways and clinical outcomes in Hodgkin lymphoma outside Europe and North America: results from the international, multicenter, retrospective, B-HOLISTIC study. Leuk Lymphoma 2022; 63:3317-3330. [PMID: 36200380 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2022.2126281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Information on Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is mostly limited to Europe and North America. This real-world, retrospective study assessed treatment pathways and clinical outcomes in adults with stage IIB-IV classical HL receiving frontline treatment (n = 1598) or relapsed/refractory HL (RRHL, n = 426) in regions outside Europe and North America between January 2010 and December 2013. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in the RRHL group. Among patients with RRHL, 89.0% received salvage chemotherapy; most common regimen was etoposide, methylprednisolone, cytarabine, cisplatin (ESHAP; 26.3%). Median PFS in the RRHL group was 13.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.9-20.2) and was longer in patients with vs. without stem cell transplantation (SCT; 20.6 vs. 7.5 months; p = 0.0071). This large-scale study identified a lower PFS for RRHL in the rest of the world compared with Europe and North America, highlighting the need for novel targeted therapies and SCT earlier in the treatment continuum.Clinical trial registration: NCT03327571.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burhan Ferhanoglu
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Tae Min Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University Cancer Research Institute, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Amado Karduss
- Bone Marrow Transplant Program, Instituto de Cancerologia, Clínica las Américas, Medellín, Colombia
| | - David Brittain
- Albert Alberts Stem Cell Transplant Center, Pretoria East Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Gayane Tumyan
- Department of Chemotherapy of Hemoblastosis, Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Mubarak Al-Mansour
- Adult Medical Oncology, Princess Noorah Oncology Center, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs-Western Region, Jeddah, The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.,College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Marta Zerga
- Department of Hematology, Angel Roffo Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Yuqin Song
- Department of Lymphoma, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Silvia Rivas-Vera
- Department of Hematology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Yok Lam Kwong
- Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.,Hematology Division, Medical Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Soon Thye Lim
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Su-Peng Yeh
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Arif Abdillah
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG-Singapore Branch, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Zhongwen Huang
- Takeda R&D Data Sciences Institute, Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. (TDCA), Lexington, MA, USA
| | - Mehul Dalal
- Takeda R&D Data Sciences Institute, Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. (TDCA), Lexington, MA, USA
| | - Hui Wan
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG-Singapore Branch, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Mark Hertzberg
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
The outcome of older adults with classic Hodgkin lymphoma in British Columbia. Blood Adv 2022; 6:5924-5932. [PMID: 36075016 PMCID: PMC9701622 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Outcomes in older adults with classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) have traditionally been poor, in part, related to poor tolerance to standard chemotherapy. Herein, we evaluated the survival of patients with cHL aged ≥60 years in British Columbia in a population-based analysis. From 1961 to 2019, 744 patients with newly diagnosed cHL were identified. With a median follow-up of 9 years, 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) have improved by decade comparison (both P < .001), remaining stable in the past 20 years (DSS, P = .35; OS, P = .26). In the modern management era (2000-present), 361 of 401 patients (90%) received active therapy for cHL and had a 5-year OS of 60%. For those who received curative-intent therapy (n = 327), the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and DSS were 60%, 65%, and 76%, respectively, and estimates were superior in those who were 60 to 69 years of age (72%, 77%, and 83%, respectively) compared with those who were 70 to 79 years of age (54%, 57%, and 70%, respectively) and ≥80 years of age (28%, 39%, and 63%, respectively) (P < .05 for all). Overall, pulmonary toxicity occurred in 58 of 279 patients (21%) treated with bleomycin, with 22 of 58 (38%) occurring after cycles 1 or 2, accounting for 8 of 20 (40%) treatment-related deaths. Outcomes in older adults with cHL have improved in recent decades; however, they remain poor for those aged ≥70 years, even in the modern treatment era. Furthermore, treatment-related toxicity remains a significant concern and use of bleomycin should be avoided in most patients.
Collapse
|
4
|
Chahal M, Hayden A, Savage KJ, Villa D, Scott DW, Gerrie AS, Lo A, Chan M, Pickles T, Connors JM, Sehn LH, Freeman CL. Outcomes after initial refusal of curative treatment in patients with classic Hodgkin lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 2022; 63:2739-2742. [DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2022.2087071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Manik Chahal
- Centre for Lymphoid Cancer and Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Kerry J. Savage
- Centre for Lymphoid Cancer and Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Diego Villa
- Centre for Lymphoid Cancer and Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - David W. Scott
- Centre for Lymphoid Cancer and Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Alina S. Gerrie
- Centre for Lymphoid Cancer and Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Andrea Lo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Matthew Chan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Tom Pickles
- Division of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Joseph M. Connors
- Centre for Lymphoid Cancer and Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Laurie Helen Sehn
- Centre for Lymphoid Cancer and Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Ciara L. Freeman
- Centre for Lymphoid Cancer and Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Blay JY, Boucher S, Le Vu B, Cropet C, Chabaud S, Perol D, Barranger E, Campone M, Conroy T, Coutant C, De Crevoisier R, Debreuve-Theresette A, Delord JP, Fumoleau P, Gentil J, Gomez F, Guerin O, Jaffré A, Lartigau E, Lemoine C, Mahe MA, Mahon FX, Mathieu-Daude H, Merrouche Y, Penault-Llorca F, Pivot X, Soria JC, Thomas G, Vera P, Vermeulin T, Viens P, Ychou M, Beaupere S. Delayed care for patients with newly diagnosed cancer due to COVID-19 and estimated impact on cancer mortality in France. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100134. [PMID: 33984676 PMCID: PMC8134718 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of the first coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) wave on cancer patient management was measured within the nationwide network of the Unicancer comprehensive cancer centers in France. PATIENTS AND METHODS The number of patients diagnosed and treated within 17 of the 18 Unicancer centers was collected in 2020 and compared with that during the same periods between 2016 and 2019. Unicancer centers treat close to 20% of cancer patients in France yearly. The reduction in the number of patients attending the Unicancer centers was analyzed per regions and cancer types. The impact of delayed care on cancer-related deaths was calculated based on different hypotheses. RESULTS A 6.8% decrease in patients managed within Unicancer in the first 7 months of 2020 versus 2019 was observed. This reduction reached 21% during April and May, and was not compensated in June and July, nor later until November 2020. This reduction was observed only for newly diagnosed patients, while the clinical activity for previously diagnosed patients increased by 4% similar to previous years. The reduction was more pronounced in women, in breast and prostate cancers, and for patients without metastasis. Using an estimated hazard ratio of 1.06 per month of delay in diagnosis and treatment of new patients, we calculated that the delays observed in the 5-month period from March to July 2020 may result in an excess mortality due to cancer of 1000-6000 patients in coming years. CONCLUSIONS In this study, the delays in cancer patient management were observed only for newly diagnosed patients, more frequently in women, for breast cancer, prostate cancer, and nonmetastatic cancers. These delays may result is an excess risk of cancer-related deaths in the coming years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Y Blay
- Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France.
| | | | | | - C Cropet
- Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| | | | - D Perol
- Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| | | | - M Campone
- Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Nantes et Angers, France
| | - T Conroy
- Institut de Cancerologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - C Coutant
- Centre George Francoise Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | | | - J P Delord
- Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | | | - J Gentil
- Centre George Francoise Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - F Gomez
- Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| | - O Guerin
- Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Nantes et Angers, France
| | | | | | - C Lemoine
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - M A Mahe
- Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | | | - H Mathieu-Daude
- Institut de Cancerologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | - X Pivot
- Centre Paul Strauss/ICANS, Strasbourg, France
| | | | - G Thomas
- Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - P Vera
- Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | | | - P Viens
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - M Ychou
- Institut de Cancerologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Clark JJ, Dwyer D, Pinwill N, Clark P, Johnson P, Hackshaw A. The effect of clinical decision making for initiation of systemic anticancer treatments in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol 2020; 22:66-73. [PMID: 33253639 PMCID: PMC7833889 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30619-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Background Cancer services worldwide had to adapt in response to the COVID-19 pandemic to minimise risk to patients and staff. We aimed to assess the national impact of COVID-19 on the prescribing of systemic anticancer treatment in England, immediately after lockdown and after the introduction of new treatments to reduce patient risk. Methods We did a retrospective analysis using data from a central National Health Service England web database mandated for clinicians to register intention to start all new systemic anticancer treatments approved for use in England since 2016. We analysed the monthly number of treatment registrations in April, 2020, after the implementation of societal lockdown on March 23, 2020, and after implementation of treatment options to reduce patient risk such as oral or less immunosuppressive drugs, in May and June, 2020. We compared the number of registrations in April–June, 2020, with the mean number of registrations and SD during the previous 6 months of unaffected cancer care (September, 2019, to February, 2020). We calculated the percentage change and absolute difference in SD units for the number of registrations overall, by tumour type, and by type and line of therapy. Findings In April, 2020, 2969 registrations were recorded, representing 1417 fewer registrations than in the control period (monthly mean 4386; 32% reduction, absolute difference 4·2 SDs, p<0·0001). In May, 2020, total registrations increased to 3950, representing a 10% reduction compared with the control period (absolute difference 1·3 SDs, p<0·0001). In June, 2020, 5022 registrations were recorded, representing a 15% increase compared with the control period (absolute difference 1·9 SDs; p<0·0001]). Interpretation After the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a reduction in systemic anticancer treatment initiation in England. However, following introduction of treatment options to reduce patient risk, registrations began to increase in May, 2020, and reached higher numbers than the pre-pandemic mean in June, 2020, when other clinical and societal risk mitigation factors (such as telephone consultations, facemasks and physical distancing) are likely to have contributed. However, outcomes of providing less treatment or delaying treatment initiation, particularly for advanced cancers and neoadjuvant therapies, require continued assessment. Funding None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James J Clark
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
| | - Dominic Dwyer
- Commercial Medicines Directorate, NHS England & NHS Improvement, Skipton House, London, UK
| | - Nina Pinwill
- Commercial Medicines Directorate, NHS England & NHS Improvement, Skipton House, London, UK
| | - Peter Clark
- Commercial Medicines Directorate, NHS England & NHS Improvement, Skipton House, London, UK
| | - Peter Johnson
- Medical Directorate, NHS England & NHS Improvement, Skipton House, London, UK; Cancer Research UK Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Allan Hackshaw
- Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Policiano C, Subirá J, Aguilar A, Monzó S, Iniesta I, Rubio Rubio JM. Impact of ABVD chemotherapy on ovarian reserve after fertility preservation in reproductive-aged women with Hodgkin lymphoma. J Assist Reprod Genet 2020; 37:1755-1761. [PMID: 32488563 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01844-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2019] [Accepted: 05/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION How is ovarian reserve affected by chemotherapy in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) who undergo fertility preservation (FP)? METHODS A retrospective study was conducted by reviewing medical records of 105 HL patients referred to the FP unit before starting adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) chemotherapy. Ovarian reserve was evaluated before chemotherapy and at the last follow-up using anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC) measurements. The decrease in AMH was compared with that expected from normograms. AMH was compared between patients who underwent cryopreservation of ovarian tissue and those who underwent cryopreservation of mature oocytes. RESULTS After ABVD, 15% of patients required hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. At a median follow-up of 33 months, the median decrease in AMH was 0.88 ng/mL, which was significantly greater than that of the general population of this age group (p < 0.001). Of the 82 women who only had ABVD, 38 underwent FP by cryopreservation of mature oocytes and 44 underwent cryopreservation of the ovarian cortex. There was no significant difference in AMH or AFC at the last follow-up between FP techniques. CONCLUSION Although ABVD is considered to be of low gonadotoxic risk, the decrease in AMH was greater than expected for patients' age, and 15% of patients needed more aggressive therapy during follow-up. Type of FP was not associated with decline in ovarian reserve. Reproductive-aged women with HL should have the opportunity for FP counseling before starting treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catarina Policiano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHLN-Hospital Universitário de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Jessica Subirá
- Accredited Group on Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Health Investigation La Fe, University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
- IVI-Valencia, Plaza de la Policía Local, 3, 46015, Valencia, Spain.
| | - Alejandra Aguilar
- Accredited Group on Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Health Investigation La Fe, University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Susana Monzó
- Accredited Group on Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Health Investigation La Fe, University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ignacio Iniesta
- Accredited Group on Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Health Investigation La Fe, University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jose María Rubio Rubio
- Accredited Group on Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Health Investigation La Fe, University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Alexander M, Blum R, Burbury K, Coutsouvelis J, Dooley M, Fazil O, Griffiths T, Ismail H, Joshi S, Love N, Opat S, Parente P, Porter N, Ross E, Siderov J, Thomas P, White S, Kirsa S, Rischin D. Timely initiation of chemotherapy: a systematic literature review of six priority cancers - results and recommendations for clinical practice. Intern Med J 2017; 47:16-34. [DOI: 10.1111/imj.13190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2015] [Revised: 01/10/2016] [Accepted: 01/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M. Alexander
- Department of Pharmacy; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine; Monash University; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - R. Blum
- Department of Medical Oncology; Bendigo Health; Bendigo Victoria Australia
| | - K. Burbury
- Department of Haematology; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - J. Coutsouvelis
- Pharmacy Department; Alfred Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Department of Centre for Medicine Use and Safety; Monash University; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - M. Dooley
- Pharmacy Department; Alfred Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Department of Centre for Medicine Use and Safety; Monash University; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - O. Fazil
- Pharmacy Department; Monash Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - T. Griffiths
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre; Austin Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - H. Ismail
- Departments of Pharmacy; Royal Women's Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - S. Joshi
- Department of Medical Oncology; Latrobe Regional Hospital; Traralgon Victoria Australia
| | - N. Love
- Department of Nursing; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - S. Opat
- Department of Clinical Haematology; Monash Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - P. Parente
- Department of Medical Oncology; Eastern Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Department of Eastern Clinical School; Monash University; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - N. Porter
- Department of Clinical Haematology; Monash Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - E. Ross
- Division of Neurosciences, Cancer and Infection Medicine; The Royal Melbourne Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - J. Siderov
- Pharmacy Department; Austin Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - P. Thomas
- Departments of Nursing; Royal Women's Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - S. White
- Department of Medical Oncology; Northern Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - S. Kirsa
- Department of Pharmacy; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - D. Rischin
- Department of Medical Oncology; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| |
Collapse
|