Association of systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure with carotid intima thickness in elderly Japanese patients

Elevated blood pressure variability is associated with an increased risk of negative health outcomes in adults aged 65 and above-a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The clinical relevance of blood pressure variability (BPV) is still unknown, despite increasing evidence associating BPV to negative health outcomes (NHOs). There is currently no gold standard to define high BPV and normal reference values for BPV are lacking.

AIM

The primary aim was to examine whether high BPV can predict NHO in adults aged ≥65. The predictive value of BPV was compared to mean BP (mBP) when both parameters were available.

METHODS

PubMed and Web of Science were systematically screened; 49 articles (12 retrospective, 18 prospective and 19 cross-sectional studies) were included and evaluated for methodological quality. Meta-analyses were conducted to examine the association of BPV (and mBP when available) with NHO.

RESULTS

Systolic BPV and systolic mBP seem to indicate at least comparable odds for cardiovascular disease (BPV: odds ratio (OR) = 1.33 (95% CI: 1.19-1.48, P < .00001) vs mBP: OR = 1.06 (95% CI: 1.03-1.09, P = .0002)) and cerebral deterioration (BPV: OR = 1.28 (95% CI: 1.17-1.41, P < .00001) vs mBP: OR = 1.06 (95% CI: 1.04-1.09, P < .00001)). Increased diastolic BPV was associated with higher odds of cerebral deterioration (OR = 1.18 (95% CI: 1.04-1.35), P = .01).

CONCLUSION

High systolic BPV and high systolic mBP are associated with 33% and 6% higher odds of cardiovascular disease in adults aged ≥65, respectively. High BPV is also related to an 18%-28% and 11% increased odds of cerebral deterioration and poor stroke recovery. An overview of cut-off values is provided for the most often reported BPV parameters in literature, which can be used as a guideline to identify elevated BPV in clinical practice.

Contemporary Prevalence and risk factors of carotid artery stenosis in asymptomatic low-income Chinese individuals: a population-based study

OBJECTIVES

Carotid artery stenosis (CAS) is an established risk factor for cerebrovascular disease. However, the contemporary prevalence and risk factors of CAS in asymptomatic rural Chinese individuals, especially low-income populations, remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to explore the present prevalence and risk factors of CAS in a low-income Chinese population.

METHODS

A total of 3126 people aged ≥ 45 years without history of stroke or cardiovascular disease were recruited for this study. B-mode ultrasonography was performed to evaluate the presence of CAS. We used multivariate analysis to determine potential risk factors for CAS.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of CAS in this population was 6.7%, with a prevalence of 8.8% for men and 5.0% for women. The risk of CAS increased with older age and a higher level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and fasting blood glucose (FBG) (all P < 0.05). Each 1-mmHg increase in SBP increased the risk of CAS by 0.011 times, each 1-mmol/L increase in LDL-C increased the risk of CAS by 0.192 times, and each 1-mmol/L increase in FBG increased the risk of CAS by 0.067 times. In addition, the risk of CAS increased 52.9% in men compared to that in women, increased 100.2% in current drinkers compared to that in never drinkers, and increased 38.9% in patients with diabetes compared to those without diabetes (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that the prevalence of CAS remains high in low-income individuals. Male sex, older age, current drinking, diabetes, and high levels of LDL-C, SBP, and FBG increase the risk of CAS. Thus, to prevent cerebrovascular disease and reduce the severe disease-associated burden for low-income individuals, there is a definitive need to control the risk factors of CAS.

Excessive pulse pressure response to standing in community population with orthostatic systolic hypertension

The postural change of pulse pressure (PP) in the persons with orthostatic hypertension (OHT) is unclear. This study included 2849 (65.0 ± 9.3 years) community participants. Blood pressures (BPs) in supine and standing positions were measured. The differences between upright and supine BP and PP were recorded as ΔBP and ΔPP. The criteria for OHT was ΔBP ≥10 mm Hg, for orthostatic hypotension (OH) was ≤-10 mm Hg and for orthostatic normotension (ONT) was -9 to 9 mm Hg. Fasting blood lipids and glucose were measured. The supine SBP of the sOHT group were similar to that of sONT group (140.9 ± 20.2 mm Hg vs 138.2 ± 19.7 mm Hg), but significantly lower than that of sOH group (151.9 ± 19.2 mm Hg; P < .05). Their PPs were 65.3 ± 15.9, 62.8 ± 14.7, and 71.1 ± 15.1 mm Hg, respectively, and with the similar group difference like SBP. When the position changed from supine to standing, the sOHT group showed PP rise, while sOH and sONT groups showed PP reduction (3.8 ± 7.1 mm Hg vs -17.0 ± 8.5 mm Hg and -5.8 ± 6.6 mm Hg; both P < .05). Thus, the standing PP in the sOHT group was significantly higher than in the sONT (69.1 ± 18.0 mm Hg vs 57.0 ± 15.8 mm Hg; P < .05) and in the sOH (54.2 ± 15.2 mm Hg; P < .05) groups. The postural PP profile varies with the postural responses of SBP. The sOHT group has obviously increased PP and significantly higher standing PP compared with the sONT group.