Monocyte subsets and monocyte-platelet aggregates: implications in predicting septic mortality among surgical critical illness patients

Circulating monocyte-platelet aggregates with different monocyte subsets and their association with disease severity in chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is usually considered an immune inflammatory disease. Interaction between platelets and monocytes is associated with immune inflammation. Cross-talk between platelets and monocytes is reflected by formation monocyte-platelet aggregates (MPAs). This study aims to test MPAs and MPAs with the different monocyte subsets to evaluate their association with disease severity in CKD.

METHODS

Forty-four hospitalized patients with CKD and twenty healthy volunteers were enrolled. The proportion of MPAs and MPAs with the different monocyte subsets were tested by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

The proportion of circulating MPAs in all patients with CKD were significantly higher than those of healthy controls (p<0.001). A higher proportion of MPAs with classical monocytes (CM) was found in CKD4-5 patients (p=0.007), while another higher proportion of MPAs with non-classical monocytes (NCM) was found CKD2-3 patients (p<0.001). The proportion of MPAs with intermediate monocytes (IM) in CKD 4-5 group was significantly higher in comparison to CKD2-3 group and healthy controls (p<0.001). Circulating MPAs were found to be correlated with serum creatinine (r=0.538, p<0.001) and eGFR (r=-0.864, p<0.001). The AUC for MPAs with IM was 0.942 (95% CI 0.890-0.994, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Study results highlight the interplay between platelets and inflammatory monocytes in CKD. There are alterations in circulating MPAs and MPAs with the different monocyte subsets in CKD patients compared to controls which change with CKD severity. The MPAs may have an important role in the development of CKD or as a predictive marker for monitoring disease severity.

Beyond Hemostasis: Platelet Innate Immune Interactions and Thromboinflammation

There is accumulating evidence that platelets play roles beyond their traditional functions in thrombosis and hemostasis, e.g., in inflammatory processes, infection and cancer, and that they interact, stimulate and regulate cells of the innate immune system such as neutrophils, monocytes and macrophages. In this review, we will focus on platelet activation in hemostatic and inflammatory processes, as well as platelet interactions with neutrophils and monocytes/macrophages. We take a closer look at the contributions of major platelet receptors GPIb, α_IIbβ₃, TLT-1, CLEC-2 and Toll-like receptors (TLRs) as well as secretions from platelet granules on platelet-neutrophil aggregate and neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation in atherosclerosis, transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) and COVID-19. Further, we will address platelet-monocyte and macrophage interactions during cancer metastasis, infection, sepsis and platelet clearance.

Evolution of Platelet Activation Parameters During Septic Shock in Intensive Care Unit

During severe sepsis, platelet activation may induce disseminate microvascular thrombosis, which play a key role in critical organ failure. Crucially, most of the studies in this field have explored platelet-leukocyte interactions in animal models, or explored platelets under the spectrum of thrombocytopenia or disseminated intravascular coagulation and have not taken into account the complex interplay that might exist between platelets and leukocytes during human septic shock nor the kinetics of platelet activation. Here, we assessed platelet activation parameters at the admission of patients with sepsis to the intensive care unit (ICU) and 48 hours later. Twenty-two patients were enrolled in the study, thirteen (59.1%) of whom were thrombocytopenic. The control group was composed of twelve infection-free patients admitted during the study period. The activation parameters studied included platelet-leukocyte interactions, assessed by flow cytometry in whole blood, as well as membrane surface and soluble platelet activation markers measured by flow cytometry and dedicated ELISA kits. We also investigated platelet aggregation and secretion responses of patients with sepsis following stimulation, compared to controls. At admission, the level of circulating monocyte-platelet and neutrophil-platelet heterotypic aggregates was significantly higher in sepsis patients compared to controls and returned to a level comparable to controls or even below 48 hours later. Basal levels of CD62P and CD63 platelet membrane exposure at admission and 48 hours later were low and similar to controls. In contrast, plasma level of soluble GPVI and soluble CD40 ligand was significantly increased in septic patients, at the two times of analysis, reflecting previous platelet activation. Platelet aggregation and secretion responses induced by specific agonists were significantly decreased in septic conditions, particularly 48 hours after admission. Hence, we have observed for the first time that critically ill septic patients compared to controls have both an early and durable platelet activation while their circulating platelets are less responsive to different agonists.

Platelet-Monocyte Aggregates: Understanding Mechanisms and Functions in Sepsis

ABSTRACT

Platelets have been shown to play an important immunomodulatory role in the pathogenesis of various diseases through their interactions with other immune and nonimmune cells. Sepsis is a major cause of death in the United States, and many of the mechanisms driving sepsis pathology are still unresolved. Monocytes have recently received increasing attention in sepsis pathogenesis, and multiple studies have associated increased levels of platelet-monocyte aggregates observed early in sepsis with clinical outcomes in sepsis patients. These findings suggest platelet-monocyte aggregates may be an important prognostic indicator. However, the mechanisms leading to platelet interaction and aggregation with monocytes, and the effects of aggregation during sepsis are still poorly defined. There are few studies that have really investigated functions of platelets and monocytes together, despite a large body of research showing separate functions of platelets and monocytes in inflammation and immune responses during sepsis. The goal of this review is to provide insights into what we do know about mechanisms and biological meanings of platelet-monocyte interactions, as well as some of the technical challenges and limitations involved in studying this important potential mechanism in sepsis pathogenesis. Improving our understanding of platelet and monocyte biology in sepsis may result in identification of novel targets that can be used to positively affect outcomes in sepsis.

Association of platelet activation markers with recurrence of atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is known to cause platelet activation. AF and its degree of thrombogenesis could be associated with monocyte-platelet aggregates (MPAs). We investigated on whether the content of MPAs or other platelet activation markers is associated with the recurrence of AF after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). A total of 73 patients with symptomatic AF underwent PVI. After 6 months, all patients were evaluated for episodes of AF recurrence. At the same time, flow-cytometric quantification analyses were performed to determine the content of MPAs. Further platelet activation parameters were detected by using either cytometric bead arrays or quantitative immunological determination. Patients with recurrent AF (n = 20) compared to individuals without AF relapse (n = 53) were associated with an increased content of MPAs (43 ± 3% vs. 33 ± 2%, p = 0.004), as well as an increased CD41 expression on monocytes (191 ± 20 vs. 113 ± 6, p = 0.001). The level of the soluble platelet activation markers such as D-dimer, sCD40L, and sP-selectin did not differ between these groups. The content of MPAs correlated weakly with the level of sCD40L (r = 0.26, p = 0.03), but not with sP-selectin and D-dimer, whereas sP-selectin and sCD40L correlated with each other (r = 0.38, p = 0.001). Only the cellular marker of platelet activation, the content of MPAs, was increased in patients with recurrent AF after PVI. In contrast, soluble markers remained unaltered. These data indicate a distinct mechanism and level of platelet activation in AF. The clinical relevance of MPAs in identifying AF recurrence or in guiding the therapy with anticoagulants remains to be elucidated.