Effects on bone mass of two oral contraceptives containing ethinylestradiol and cyproterone acetate or desogestrel: results of a 2-year follow-up

Bone health and hormonal contraception

INTRODUCTION

Short-term and long-term steroid contraceptive systems are widely employed in adolescents and premenopausal women; they could induce variation in bone metabolism, but whether these changes increase the overall fracture risk is not yet clear.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic search of scientific publications about "hormonal contraceptives" and "bone metabolism" in reproductive age women was conducted.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

In adolescent girl, combined oral contraceptives could have a deleterious effect on bone health when their onset is within three years after menarche and when they contain ethinyl estradiol at the dose of 20 mcg. In perimenopausal women, steroid contraceptives seem not influence bone health nor increase osteoporotic fractures risk in menopause. The oral progestogens intake is not related to negative effects on skeletal health. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) induce a prolonged hypoestrogenism with secondary detrimental effect on healthy bone; the higher bone loss was observed at the DMPA dose of 150 mg intramuscular such as after long-term DMPA-users. Progestin-based implants and intrauterine devices have not negative effect on bone health.

CONCLUSIONS

Since sex-steroid drugs induce variations in hormonal circulating concentrations, they may negatively affect bone metabolism. Contraceptive choice should be tailored evaluating any possible effect on bone health. Clinicians should always perform a precontraceptive counselling to identify any coexisting condition that may affect bone health. Further randomized studies are needed to confirm these results.

Interventions for hirsutism (excluding laser and photoepilation therapy alone)

BACKGROUND

Hirsutism occurs in 5% to 10% of women of reproductive age when there is excessive terminal hair growth in androgen-sensitive areas (male pattern). It is a distressing disorder with a major impact on quality of life. The most common cause is polycystic ovary syndrome. There are many treatment options, but it is not clear which are most effective.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of interventions (except laser and light-based therapies alone) for hirsutism.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL (2014, Issue 6), MEDLINE (from 1946), EMBASE (from 1974), and five trials registers, and checked reference lists of included studies for additional trials. The last search was in June 2014.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in hirsute women with polycystic ovary syndrome, idiopathic hirsutism, or idiopathic hyperandrogenism.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent authors carried out study selection, data extraction, 'Risk of bias' assessment, and analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 157 studies (sample size 30 to 80) comprising 10,550 women (mean age 25 years). The majority of studies (123/157) were 'high', 30 'unclear', and four 'low' risk of bias. Lack of blinding was the most frequent source of bias. Treatment duration was six to 12 months. Forty-eight studies provided no usable or retrievable data, i.e. lack of separate data for hirsute women, conference proceedings, and losses to follow-up above 40%.Primary outcomes, 'participant-reported improvement of hirsutism' and 'change in health-related quality of life', were addressed in few studies, and adverse events in only half. In most comparisons there was insufficient evidence to determine if the number of reported adverse events differed. These included known adverse events: gastrointestinal discomfort, breast tenderness, reduced libido, dry skin (flutamide and finasteride); irregular bleeding (spironolactone); nausea, diarrhoea, bloating (metformin); hot flushes, decreased libido, vaginal dryness, headaches (gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues)).Clinician's evaluation of hirsutism and change in androgen levels were addressed in most comparisons, change in body mass index (BMI) and improvement of other clinical signs of hyperandrogenism in one-third of studies.The quality of evidence was moderate to very low for most outcomes.There was low quality evidence for the effect of two oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) (ethinyl estradiol + cyproterone acetate versus ethinyl estradiol + desogestrel) on change from baseline of Ferriman-Gallwey scores. The mean difference (MD) was -1.84 (95% confidence interval (CI) -3.86 to 0.18).There was very low quality evidence that flutamide 250 mg, twice daily, reduced Ferriman-Gallwey scores more effectively than placebo (MD -7.60, 95% CI -10.53 to -4.67 and MD -7.20, 95% CI -10.15 to -4.25). Participants' evaluations in one study with 20 participants confirmed these results (risk ratio (RR) 17.00, 95% CI 1.11 to 259.87).Spironolactone 100 mg daily was more effective than placebo in reducing Ferriman-Gallwey scores (MD -7.69, 95% CI -10.12 to -5.26) (low quality evidence). It showed similar effectiveness to flutamide in two studies (MD -1.90, 95% CI -5.01 to 1.21 and MD 0.49, 95% CI -1.99 to 2.97) (very low quality evidence), as well as to finasteride in two studies (MD 1.49, 95% CI -0.58 to 3.56 and MD 0.40, 95% CI -1.18 to 1.98) (low quality evidence).Although there was very low quality evidence of a difference in reduction of Ferriman-Gallwey scores for finasteride 5 mg to 7.5 mg daily versus placebo (MD -5.73, 95% CI -6.87 to -4.58), it was unlikely it was clinically meaningful. These results were reinforced by participants' assessments (RR 2.06, 95% CI 0.99 to 4.29 and RR 11.00, 95% CI 0.69 to 175.86). However, finasteride showed inconsistent results in comparisons with other treatments, and no firm conclusions could be reached.Metformin demonstrated no benefit over placebo in reduction of Ferriman-Gallwey scores (MD 0.05, 95% CI -1.02 to 1.12), but the quality of evidence was low. Results regarding the effectiveness of GnRH analogues were inconsistent, varying from minimal to important improvements.We were unable to pool data for OCPs with cyproterone acetate 20 mg to 100 mg due to clinical and methodological heterogeneity between studies. However, addition of cyproterone acetate to OCPs provided greater reductions in Ferriman-Gallwey scores.Two studies, comparing finasteride 5 mg and spironolactone 100 mg, did not show differences in participant assessments and reduction of Ferriman-Gallwey scores (low quality evidence). Ferriman-Gallwey scores from three studies comparing flutamide versus metformin could not be pooled (I² = 62%). One study comparing flutamide 250 mg twice daily with metformin 850 mg twice daily for 12 months, which reached a higher cumulative dosage than two other studies evaluating this comparison, showed flutamide to be more effective (MD -6.30, 95% CI -9.83 to -2.77) (very low quality evidence). Data showing reductions in Ferriman-Gallwey scores could not be pooled for four studies comparing finasteride with flutamide as the results were inconsistent (I² = 67%).Studies examining effects of hypocaloric diets reported reductions in BMI, but which did not result in reductions in Ferriman-Gallwey scores. Although certain cosmetic measures are commonly used, we did not identify any relevant RCTs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Treatments may need to incorporate pharmacological therapies, cosmetic procedures, and psychological support. For mild hirsutism there is evidence of limited quality that OCPs are effective. Flutamide 250 mg twice daily and spironolactone 100 mg daily appeared to be effective and safe, albeit the evidence was low to very low quality. Finasteride 5 mg daily showed inconsistent results in different comparisons, therefore no firm conclusions can be made. As the side effects of antiandrogens and finasteride are well known, these should be accounted for in any clinical decision-making. There was low quality evidence that metformin was ineffective for hirsutism and although GnRH analogues showed inconsistent results in reducing hirsutism they do have significant side effects.Further research should consist of well-designed, rigorously reported, head-to-head trials examining OCPs combined with antiandrogens or 5α-reductase inhibitor against OCP monotherapy, as well as the different antiandrogens and 5α-reductase inhibitors against each other. Outcomes should be based on standardised scales of participants' assessment of treatment efficacy, with a greater emphasis on change in quality of life as a result of treatment.

Effect of oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy on bone mineral density in premenopausal and perimenopausal women: a systematic review

Seventy five articles on the effect of oral contraceptives and other hormone replacement on bone density in premenopausal and perimenopausal women were reviewed. The evidence was appraised using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine levels of evidence. There is good evidence for a positive effect of oral contraceptives on bone density in perimenopausal women, and fair evidence for a positive effect in "hypothalamic" oligo/amenorrhoeic premenopausal women. There is limited evidence for a positive effect in healthy and anorexic premenopausal women. In hypothalamic oligo/amenorrhoeic women, baseline bone density has been shown to be significantly lower than that in healthy controls, therefore the decision to treat is clinically more important. The ideal formulation(s) and duration of treatment remain to be determined by further longitudinal and prospective randomised controlled trials in larger subject populations.

Short-term variations in bone remodeling markers of an oral contraception formulation containing 3 mg of drospirenone plus 30 μg of ethinyl estradiol: Observational study in young postadolescent women

The clinical study of treated subjects and nontreated controls was made in healthy eumenorrheic young postadolescent women volunteers in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at Cagliari University, to investigate whether an oral contraceptive (OC) containing drospirenone (3 mg) plus ethinyl estradiol (30 microg) (DRSP+EE) can affect bone metabolism. Control group (n = 26) and OC group (n = 28) women did not differ in age, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio and main outcome measures [urinary levels of deoxypyridinoline and pyridinoline, serum levels of osteocalcin, bone specific alkaline phosphatase (bSAP), total testosterone (total-T), sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), progesterone and bone mineral density (BMD) at the heel]. The control group was studied at the luteal phase (LP) during both the first and the sixth menstrual cycle; the OC group was studied during the first cycle at the LP, and on days 16-18 of the sixth cycle of DRSP+EE treatment. At the sixth cycle, in the control group, the main outcome measures did not change compared to baseline. In the OC group, deoxypyridinoline, pyridinoline, osteocalcin, bSAP, total-T and progesterone levels were reduced, whereas SHBG levels were increased. The BMD was unchanged compared to baseline. The results suggest that 6-month DRSP+EE treatment decreases bone turnover.

Lifestyle factors and the development of bone mass and bone strength in young women

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the contributions of adolescent calcium intake, oral contraceptive use, and exercise on bone mass and bone strength.Study design Eighty white women participated in 10 years of the Penn State Young Women's Health Study, a longitudinal study of community participants. We measured bone mineral mass (g), density (BMD, g/cm(2)), and body composition from dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and estimated proximal femur section modulus (bone bending strength). Calcium intake was determined from 45 days of prospective food records at regular intervals between the ages of 12 and 22 years. Exercise history and oral contraceptive use were assessed by questionnaire.

RESULTS

Daily calcium intakes between the ages of 12 and 22 years ranged from 500 to 1900 mg/d and were not significantly associated with bone gain or bone strength. Oral contraceptive use during adolescence was not correlated with bone or body composition measurements. Femoral neck BMD did not change from 17 to 22 years of age, but section modulus increased 3% (P <.05). Only exercise during adolescence was significantly associated with increased BMD and bone bending strength.

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescent lifestyle patterns can influence young adult bone strength. Our data suggest that exercise is the predominant lifestyle determinant of bone strength for this cohort.

Overview on the effects of progestins on bone

In view of the fact that fractures are the clinically relevant events, risk factors for fractures are discussed first. Bone mineral density (BMD) appears to be a much less important risk factor for the most severe hip fractures than the risk of falling. No results of experimental studies on hormones and fractures at advanced age are available. An overview of the effects of progestins on bone is given. Effects of progestins on bone have been studied by in vitro experiments using cell lines and by more relevant clinical observations. Prospective studies have been conducted following the use of progestins contained in oral contraceptives, alone or in combination with oestrogens; long-term contraception by injection of depot preparations; so-called "add-back" hormonal therapy attempting to reverse the adverse effects of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists on bone and after different regimens of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women. From the data there are no indications that the various progestins, used in clinical practice, have either a bone-protective or an oestrogen antagonistic activity. Progestins do not add or subtract much of the protective action of oestrogens on the bones.

Longitudinal changes in bone density in relation to oral contraceptive use

The primary aim of this 36-month prospective cohort study was to evaluate the association between use of oral contraceptives (OCs) and bone mineral density in reproductive-age women. The 36-month bone density (g/cm2) at the spine, hip and whole body and percent change from baseline (measured at 6-month intervals) were evaluated among 245 women 18-39 years of age; 89 were using OCs (median duration: 3.7 years at study entry) and 156 were not using any hormonal contraception. Before and after adjustment for covariates (baseline bone density, age, race, ever pregnant, exercise, body mass and calcium intake), women using OCs did not differ significantly from comparison women in percent change in bone density over 36 months or in absolute bone density at 36 months. All p-values for between-group differences were >0.55. In conclusion, within the limitations of this study, OCs did not appear to impact bone density over time in this cohort of reproductive-age women.

Effects of a triphasic combination oral contraceptive containing norgestimate/ethinyl estradiol on biochemical markers of bone metabolism in young women with osteopenia secondary to hypothalamic amenorrhea

This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study of 45 patients evaluated the short-term effects of an oral contraceptive [Ortho Tri-Cyclen, 180-250 micro g of norgestimate (NGM) and 35 microg of ethinyl estradiol (EE)] on biochemical markers of bone resorption, formation, and osteoprotegerin in young women (mean age +/- SD, 26.5 +/- 6.3 yr) with hypothalamic amenorrhea and osteopenia. Body fat, endocrine, and cognitive function were evaluated as secondary endpoints. Biomarkers of bone metabolism were measured at baseline and after three cycles of NGM/EE or placebo. There were significant decreases in mean values of N-telopeptide [mean (SD), -13.4 (13.4) vs. 1.2 (23.8) nmol bone collagen equivalents (BCE)/mmol creatinine (Cr); P = 0.001] and deoxypyridinoline [-1.2 (2.9) vs. -0.5 (1.5) nmol deoxypyridinoline/mmol Cr; P = 0.021] as well as significant decreases in bone specific alkaline phosphatase [-5.1 (3.5) vs. 0.4 (3.1) ng/ml; P < 0.001], osteocalcin [-5.9 (3.6) vs. -2.9 (3.7); P = 0.016], and procollagen of type I propeptide [-35.2 (44.6) vs. -0.2 (30.0) ng/ml; P = 0.025], but not osteoprotegerin [0.39 (1.46) vs. -0.2 (0.49) pmol/liter; P = 0.397] in the NGM/EE vs. placebo group. There were no significant differences between groups with respect to changes in cognitive function, mood, body weight, body mass index, body fat, percentage of body fat, and all endocrine levels except FSH, [-3.7 (3.8) vs. -0.6 (2.1) IU/liter; P < 0.001, NGM/EE vs. placebo]. No serious adverse events were reported in either group. These results suggest that NGM/EE decreases bone turnover in osteopenic premenopausal women with hypothalamic amenorrhea. Further studies are needed to determine whether estrogen will increase bone density in this population.

Cyproterone acetate for hirsutism

BACKGROUND

Hirsutism is a distressing and relatively common endocrine problem in women which may prove difficult to manage. Cyproterone acetate, an anti-androgen, is frequently used to treat hirsutism, usually in combination with ethinyl estradiol.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to investigate the effectiveness of cyproterone acetate alone, or in combination with ethinyl estradiol, in reducing hair growth in women with hirsutism secondary to ovarian hyperandrogenism.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group trials register was searched (last search - 4 June 2002). The Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group register is based on regular searches of MEDLINE (1966 to 2002), EMBASE (1980 to 2002), CINAHL (1982 to 2002), PsycINFO (1987 to 2002) and CENTRAL (Issue 2, 2002 of the Cochrane Library) the handsearching of several journals and conference proceedings, and searches of several key grey literature sources. All publications of randomised controlled trials of cyproterone acetate with or without estrogen versus placebo or other drug therapies for hirsutism were identified.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled studies comparing:- cyproterone acetate to placebo- cyproterone acetate with ethinyl estradiol to placebo- cyproterone acetate with ethinyl estradiol to cyproterone acetate alone- cyproterone acetate (with or without estradiol) to other medical therapies for treatment of hirsutism.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Eleven studies were identified which fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Nine randomised studies were included in the review, and two were excluded because of insufficient information. Only one study had more than 100 women included in the analysis. The major outcomes included: subjective improvement in hirsutism, changes in Ferriman Gallwey scores, changes in linear hair growth and hair shaft diameter, alterations in endocrine parameters, side effects to treatment, withdrawals during therapy

MAIN RESULTS

There were no clinical trials comparing cyproterone acetate alone with placebo. There was one small study comparing cyproterone acetate in combination with ethinyl estradiol to placebo. In this study there was a significant subjective reduction in hair growth with cyproterone acetate therapy, although the confidence limits were large. There were no studies comparing cyproterone acetate alone with cyproterone acetate in combination with ethinyl estradiol to treat hirsutism. In studies where cyproterone acetate was compared to other drug modalities (ketoconazole, spironolactone, flutamide, finasteride, GnRH analogues) no difference in clinical outcome was noted. There were, however, endocrinological differences in androgen and estrogen levels between different drug therapies. There were insufficient data to assess differences in side effects between women treated with cyproterone acetate and other medical therapy.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Cyproterone acetate combined with estradiol results in a subjective improvement in hirsutism compared to placebo. Clinical differences in outcome between cyproterone acetate and other medical therapies were not demonstrated in the studies included in this review. This may be because of the small size of the studies, lack of standardized assessment and lack of objective determinants of improvement in hirsutism. The endocrinological effects of the different drug therapies reflect the mode of action. Larger carefully designed studies are needed to compare efficacy and safety profiles between drug therapies for hirsutism.

Forearm bone density in long-term users of oral combined contraceptives and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate

OBJECTIVE

To compare the bone mineral density of users of combined oral contraceptives (OC) or depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (depot-MPA) with women who have never used a hormonal contraceptive method.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Academic tertiary-care hospital.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 189 women, aged 30 to 34 years old, were allocated to three groups: 63 who had used OC for at least 2 years; 63 who had used depot-MPA for at least 2 years; and 63 control women who had never used hormonal contraceptives.

INTERVENTION(S)

Each woman's bone mineral density (BMD) was evaluated at the distal and ultradistal section of the radius of the nondominant forearm by the use of single x-ray absorptiometry.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

We obtained BMD measurements for each participant.

RESULT(S)

Independent of the period of use and the section of the forearm studied, we found no difference in BMD for OC or depot-MPA users when compared to women who had never used hormonal contraceptive methods. In addition, BMD was similar between OC users and depot-MPA users. The multiple linear regression analysis showed that the variables associated with BMD were weight, number of pregnancies, and the woman's occupation.

CONCLUSION(S)

Women aged 30 to 34 years who have used OC or depot-MPA have similar BMD as control women. These findings suggest that the use of OC or depot-MPA does not affect the BMD of women in this age group.

The effect of combined oral contraception with or without spironolactone on bone mineral density of hyperandrogenic women

We studied the effect of treatment with combined oral contraception (COC) with or without spironolactone on the bone mineral density (BMD) of hyperandrogenic women. A group of 22 women (group 1) was treated with ethinylestradiol plus desogestrel for 21 days each month for 12 months, while another group of 21 patients (group 2) was treated with ethinylestradiol and desogestrel for 21 days each month plus spironolactone daily for 12 months. There was no statistically significant difference with respect to mean age, body mass index (BMI) and BMD between the two groups of patients before the treatment. Serum levels of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), androstenedione, total testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), prolactin and estradiol were assessed in both groups and no statistically significant difference was found before treatment. Nor was there any statistically significant difference in bone turnover between the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student's t test for unpaired data to compare age, BMD and biochemical data, and statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. The BMD before and after 12 months of treatment showed no statistically significant difference between the patients of group 1 and those of group 2, suggesting that both ethinylestradiol plus desogestrel, and ethinylestradiol and desogestrel plus spironolactone daily for 12 months at the given doses do not affect the BMD of the treated women, while the addition of spironolactone improves the efficacy of hirsutism treatment.

Evidence that treatment with monophasic oral contraceptive formulations containing ethinylestradiol plus gestodene reduces bone resorption in young women

The aim of the study was to evaluate if a pill containing the same dose of the same type of progestin compound (gestodene, GES, 75 microg) but different doses of ethinylestradiol (EE2) (20 or 30 microg) differently influences specific markers of bone resorption (urinary levels of pyridinoline (PYR) and dexoxypyridinoline (D-PYR)). During the 12 months of the study a significant decrease of urinary levels of PYR and D-PYR was found in 2 groups of young post-adolescent women taking the pills with 20 and 30 microg of EE2 in comparison with control women (subjects of the same age group with normal menstrual cycle who did not use contraception). In women taking pills with 20 or 30 microg EE2, the levels of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) significantly increased during treatment in comparison with baseline, whereas in the same time period no changes occurred in control women. These findings suggest that similar to the pill containing 30 microg EE2, the lower dosage of the EE2 pill (20 microg) is also capable of reducing bone resorption. Twenty and 30 microg EE2 pills exert the same biological estrogenic effect. In fact, SHBG levels significantly increased with both pills. However, an additional effect of the progestin compound that could act directly on progestin or estrogen receptors of bone cannot be excluded. Since contraception with a pill containing the lowest estrogen dose is associated with the lowest incidence of side effects, these findings further suggest a pill containing 20 microg EE2 for young post-adolescent women would be the best choice.