Epidemiology of congenital hearing loss in Victoria, Australia: Epidemiología de la hipoacusia congénita en Victoria, Australia

Reliability and validity assessment of a survey: Measuring satisfaction with cochlear implant rehabilitation services for children in Jordan

BACKGROUND

Assessing parental satisfaction with healthcare services is crucial, particularly for parents and their children, who are the primary recipients of these services. In the context of Arabic-speaking parents, there is a notable absence of survey instruments tailored to measure their satisfaction. This study seeks to address this gap by validating a survey designed to evaluate parental satisfaction with rehabilitation services (RSs) provided to Jordanian children who have received cochlear implants (CIs).

METHODS

The study included 92 participants and followed a four-step methodology: 1) a literature review and expert input; 2) cognitive interviews, pilot testing, and test-retest reliability testing; 3) data collection; 4) validity and reliability assessments.

RESULTS

The survey's validity was confirmed. Expert input and cognitive interviews improved content validity, and factor analysis established construct validity by revealing six factors explaining 82.33% of the variance in the survey scale. Convergent and discriminant validity were confirmed (composite reliability >0.7 and average variance extracted value >0.5). Cronbach's α exceeded 0.8 for each factor and reached 0.855 for the total scale. Survey results showed reliance on speech therapy and audiology, varied rehabilitation durations, and progress. Parents expressed overall satisfaction, particularly influenced by technical quality and efficacy/outcome dimensions. Parents' recommendations to enhance satisfaction with RSs included financial support, improved service accessibility, enhanced service delivery, specialized education, and increased public awareness.

CONCLUSION

This study validates an Arabic satisfaction survey, emphasizing the significance of multidisciplinary, extended rehabilitation programs, skilled professionals, and positive outcomes. It emphasizes the necessity for improved access to specialized care and collaboration among healthcare, government, and media to shape parental perceptions of RSs. While the findings indicate overall satisfaction, they also reveal challenges faced by parents, highlighting the need for comprehensive support systems. These insights assist healthcare providers and policymakers in enhancing care quality and meeting the needs of CI children's families, thereby improving the RSs experience in Jordan.

Communication abilities in children with hearing loss - views of parents and daycare professionals

INTRODUCTION

Today, children with hearing loss (HL) are diagnosed and fitted with hearing devices at an early age. However, HL may still influence their communicative development. Thus, we need up-to-date research on how children perform in their everyday environments, such as at home or daycare. This study provides an overview of the communication abilities of early-diagnosed children with HL reported by parents and daycare professionals. The first aim of the study is to compare the results of children with bilateral hearing aids (BiHAs) or bilateral cochlear implants (BiCIs) with those of children with normal hearing (NH) and with each other. The second aim of the study is to compare the views of the two respondents, parents and the daycare professionals. In addition, the effects of gender and nonverbal intelligence quotient (IQ) on the responses are explored.

METHODS

The participants, aged 4;0-6;9, were 25 children with BiHAs, 29 children with BiCIs, and 64 children with NH. The Finnish version of the Children's Communication Checklist-2 (CCC-2) was used to assess the communication skills of the participants.

RESULTS

Group and nonverbal IQ had a significant effect on the General Communication Composite (GCC) score. Both groups of children with HL had poorer GCC scores than the children with NH, apart from the respondent. The BiHA-group had significantly lower scores than the NH-group on Speech, Syntax, Semantics, and Coherence subscales. The BiCI-group had significantly lower scores than the NH-group across all subscales of the CCC-2. The parents rated the participants significantly higher than the daycare professionals in Speech and Social Relations. In contrast, the daycare professionals rated the participants higher than the parents in Coherence, Inappropriate Initiation, Stereotyped Language, and Use of Context. Furthermore, gender influenced Coherence, Nonverbal Communication, Social Relations, and Interests, for which the girls performed better than the boys. The nonverbal IQ had an effect on Syntax, Semantics, and Use of Context, for which higher nonverbal IQ was associated with better performance.

CONCLUSIONS

On average the children with HL had poorer communication skills than the children with NH. Pragmatic difficulties were more common in the BiCI-group than in the BiHA-group. The respondents were not completely unanimous, which may be because of the different demands of different environments.

Mild matters: parental insights into the conundrums of managing mild congenital hearing loss

OBJECTIVE

To explore and describe parental experiences related to the management of mild bilateral congenital hearing loss in children.

DESIGN

Using qualitative methods, we conducted semi-structured interviews with parents/caregivers until saturation of themes was achieved. We analysed transcripts using inductive content analysis.

STUDY SAMPLE

Caregivers of children under 3-years-old with mild bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.

RESULTS

We interviewed 12 parents. Parental perception of advice regarding hearing aid fitting was varied; almost all children were offered hearing aids. Perceived positives related to hearing aids: feeling empowered that action has been taken; improvements in the child's hearing perception and; facilitation of behavioural management. Perceived negatives of hearing aid use: difficulties with compliance resulting in parental frustration and guilt, damage/loss of equipment, discomfort, parental discord, altered quality of natural sound and potential bullying/stigma. Some parents were ambivalent about the effect of the hearing aids. Where hearing aids were offered and not fitted, there was significant ongoing uncertainty, and the family carried the burden of their decision.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a wide variation in perceived advice regarding early hearing aid fitting in children with mild bilateral hearing loss. We identified parental perceptions of positive/negative impacts of hearing aid fitting and potential perceived harms from not fitting.

Spoken Language Skills in Children With Bilateral Hearing Aids or Bilateral Cochlear Implants at the Age of Three Years

Early hearing aid (HA) fitting and cochlear implants (CIs) aim to reduce the effects of hearing loss (HL) on spoken language development. The goals of this study were (1) to examine spoken language skills of children with bilateral HAs and children with bilateral CIs; (2) to compare their language skills to the age-norms of peers with normal hearing (NH); and (3) to investigate factors associated with spoken language outcomes.

Auditory, Social, and Behavioral Skills of Children With Unilateral/Mild Hearing Loss

This study explored the impact of mild bilateral or unilateral hearing loss on auditory, social, and behavior skills in early school-aged children. Thirty-two children (aged 5-9 years) were evaluated with parent and teacher questionnaires. Most outcomes were within the range of expected scores. However, functional auditory skills were below published results for children with typical hearing. On the social skills scale, about 21.4% (parent-reported) and 20.0% (teacher-reported) of children were below one standard deviation (SD) of the normative mean (i.e., a standard score below 85). On the parent-reported behavior test, over a quarter of children scored beyond 1 SD on some subscales. Laterality of hearing loss had no effect on outcomes (p > .05). Agreement between parents and teachers varied from poor (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: .162) to moderate (ICC: .448). Results indicate that these children are functioning in most areas like their peers with typical hearing. Additional research on this population of children who may benefit from early identification and amplification is warranted.

Risk factors for permanent childhood hearing impairment

OBJECTIVE

While several perinatal risk factors for permanent childhood hearing impairment (PCHI) are known, association with gestational length remains unclear. We hypothesised that shorter gestational length predicts higher PCHI risk.

DESIGN

19 504 participants from the UK Millennium Cohort Study (born 2000-2002, prior to newborn screening).

METHODS

Multivariable discrete-time survival analysis to examine associations between parent-reported PCHI by age 11 years and gestational length, plus other prespecified factors.

RESULTS

PCHI affected 2.1 per 1000 children (95% CI 1.5 to 3.0) by age 11; however, gestational length did not predict PCHI risk (HR, 95% CI 1.00, 0.98 to 1.03 per day increase). Risk was increased in those with neonatal illness, with or without admission to neonatal care (6.33, 2.27 to 17.63 and 2.62, 1.15 to 5.97, respectively), of Bangladeshi or Pakistani ethnicity (2.78, 1.06 to 7.31) or born to younger mothers (0.92, 0.87 to 0.97 per year).

CONCLUSION

Neonatal illness, rather than gestational length, predicts PCHI risk. Further research should explore associations with ethnicity.

Evidence-Based Practices and Outcomes for Children with Mild and Unilateral Hearing Loss

Purpose This forum provides an overview of current research and clinical practice for children with mild bilateral or unilateral hearing loss. Historically, there has been ambiguity surrounding the need for intervention in this population. Our goal is to explore the literature on outcomes and treatment so that audiologists, speech-language pathologists, teachers, physicians, and families can be confident in the clinical decision-making process when working with these children. To that end, topics include (a) progression of mild hearing loss in children; (b) the impact of mild or unilateral hearing loss on language, listening, and cognitive abilities; (c) research and reviews on intervention approaches; and (d) listening effort and fatigue in unilateral hearing loss. Conclusion Uncertainty about outcomes and treatment approaches for children with mild or unilateral hearing loss leads to inconsistent intervention and increased developmental risk. We hope that this forum will generate productive discussion among researchers and clinicians to ensure that all children with hearing loss reach their full potential.

Progressive Hearing Loss in Children With Mild Bilateral Hearing Loss

Purpose This study investigated progressive hearing loss in a cohort of children who were identified with permanent mild bilateral hearing loss. Method This population-based study included 207 children with permanent mild bilateral hearing loss, diagnosed and followed from 2003 to 2016 in 1 region of Canada. Clinical characteristics and initial audiologic results were collected prospectively at diagnosis, and audiologic information was updated. Changes in hearing levels between the 1st and most recent assessment were analyzed to determine progressive hearing loss. Clinical characteristics were compared between children with progressive and stable hearing loss. The association between risk indicators and progressive hearing loss was explored through logistic regression. Results A total of 47.4% (94 of 207) had progressive hearing loss in at least 1 ear, and 50% (47 of 94) of those experienced more than 20-dB average drop in thresholds. For these 94 children, a total of 147 ears were affected, and 116 (78.9%) ears experienced sufficient change in thresholds to be coded as a worse category of hearing loss. In the subset of 85 children with more than 5 years of audiologic follow-up, 56.4% (53/85) showed a decrease in hearing. Of the total sample of 207 children, 137 (66.2%) continued to have mild hearing loss in the better ear. There was no association between the risk factors examined (family history of hearing loss, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, or presence of a syndrome) and progressive hearing loss. Conclusion This study found that almost half of children with mild bilateral hearing loss showed a decrease in hearing in at least 1 ear. One third of the children first diagnosed with mild hearing loss in the better ear now have moderate or worse hearing loss in both ears. These findings point to the importance of careful long-term monitoring of children who present with mild hearing loss.

Rating the overall speech quality of hearing-impaired children by means of comparative judgements

OBJECTIVE

Acoustic measurements have shown that the speech of hearing-impaired (HI) children deviates from the speech of normally hearing (NH) peers. The aim of the present study is to examine whether listeners with varying degrees of experience with (HI) children's speech perceive a difference in the overall speech quality of seven-year-old NH children and their HI peers who received a device before the age of two.

METHOD

Short speech samples of seven children with NH, seven children with an acoustic hearing aid (HA) and seven children with a cochlear implant (CI) were judged by three groups of listeners (audiologists, primary school teachers and inexperienced listeners) in a comparative judgement task. In this task, listeners compared stimuli in pairs and decided which stimulus sounded better, leading to a ranking of the stimuli according to their overall speech quality.

RESULTS

The ranking showed that the overall speech quality differed considerably for HI and NH children. The latter group had a significantly higher overall speech quality than HI children. In the group of HI children, children with CI were ranked higher than children with HA. Moreover, length of device use was found to have a significant effect in the group of children with CI: longer device experience led to better ratings. This effect was significantly less strong in HA children. No significant differences were found between the three groups of listeners.

CONCLUSION

Listeners agree that the speech of NH children sounds better than the speech of HI children. This result indicates that even after almost seven years of device use, the speech of HI children still differs from the speech of NH children. The overall speech quality of CI children was better than that of HA children, and this effect increased with longer device use. No effect of listeners' experience with (NH and/or HI) children's speech was established.

Prevalence of Severe and Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss in School Children in West Bengal, India

There is pressing need for reliable information about prevalence of sensorineural hearing loss in children in India. Without this basic information it is difficult to plan services on a rational basis. In this stratified cross sectional study, we aimed to determine the prevalence of severe and profound sensorineural hearing loss in school children in West Bengal, India. We hypothesized that all children with severe or profound hearing loss in elementary schools (age 6-14 years) would be among those identified as 'children with special need' because of their marked problems with hearing, speech or communication. First stratum of our study included all 6-14 years old mainstream elementary school 'children with special need', with known or suspected hearing problem. Second stratum covered all 6-14 years old hearing impaired children attending special schools. Comprehensive audiological assessment of 10,763 'children with special need' in mainstream elementary schools identified 3984 children showing severe or profound SNHL (≥71 dB). A further 1022 children were identified with similar loss in special schools, giving a total of 5006 children with severe or profound sensorineural loss among a school population of 8,654,057, with estimated prevalence of 0.58 (CI 0.57-0.59) per 1000 children. This is the first large scale study of the epidemiology of severe and profound sensorineural hearing loss in school children in India. Although further studies are needed from other parts of India, in the interim, findings of this study can form the basis for planning resource allocation, service provision, investigation into etiology and prevention of sensorineural deafness in children in India.

Economic Evaluations of Childhood Hearing Loss Screening Programmes: A Systematic Review and Critique

BACKGROUND

Permanent childhood hearing loss is one of the most common birth conditions associated with speech and language delay. A hearing screening can result in early detection and intervention for hearing loss.

OBJECTIVES

To update and expand previous systematic reviews of economic evaluations of childhood hearing screening strategies, and explore the methodological differences.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane database, National Health Services Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED), the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) database, and Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health's (CADTH) Grey matters.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS

Economic evaluations reporting costs and outcomes for both the intervention and comparator arms related to childhood hearing screening strategies.

RESULTS

Thirty evaluations (from 29 articles) were included for review. Several methodological issues were identified, including: few evaluations reported outcomes in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs); none estimated utilities directly from surveying children; none included disutilities and costs associated with adverse events; few included costs and outcomes that differed by severity; few included long-term estimates; none considered acquired hearing loss; some did not present incremental results; and few conducted comprehensive univariate or probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Evaluations published post-2011 were more likely to report QALYs and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) as outcome measures, include long-term treatment and productivity costs, and present incremental results.

LIMITATIONS

We were unable to access the economic models and, although we employed an extensive search strategy, potentially not all relevant economic evaluations were identified.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Most economic evaluations concluded that childhood hearing screening is value for money. However, there were significant methodological limitations with the evaluations.

Childhood sensorineural hearing loss and adult mental health up to 43 years later: results from the HUNT study

Background

Hearing loss is a global public health problem putting millions of people at risk of experiencing impediments in communication and potentially impaired mental health. Many studies in this field are based on small, cross sectional samples using self-report measures. The present study aims to investigate the association between childhood sensorineural hearing loss and mental health in adult men and women longitudinally in a large cohort with a matched control group, and hearing is measured by pure-tone audiometry. Studies of this kind are virtually non-existing.

Methods

The present study combines data from two large studies; the School Hearing Investigation in Nord-Trøndelag (SHINT) carried out yearly from 1954 to 1986, and the second wave of the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT 2) conducted from 1995 to 1997. The participants were 7, 10 or 13 years during the SHINT, and between 20 and 56 years old during HUNT 2. The total sample consisted of 32,456 participants (of which 32,104 in the reference group). Participants with a sensorineural hearing loss in SHINT of 41 dB or more were classified with moderate-severe hearing loss (N = 66), 26–40 dB as mild (N = 66) and 16–25 dB as slight (N = 220). Mental health in adulthood was measured in HUNT 2 by symptoms of anxiety and depression, subjective well-being, and self-esteem. The association between childhood sensorineural hearing loss and adult mental health was tested by means of ANOVA.

Results

There was a significant relation between slight childhood sensorineural hearing loss and lowered subjective well-being in women (B = −.25, p = 0.038). Further investigation of the results revealed a significant association between slight hearing loss and symptoms of anxiety and depression (B = .30, p = 0.054) and between mild hearing loss and lowered self-esteem (B = .63, p = 0.024) among women aged 20–39 years. There were no significant relations between childhood sensorineural hearing loss and any of the three mental health outcomes among men.

Conclusions

This study suggests that women with slight or mild sensorineural hearing loss from childhood experience elevated levels of symptoms of anxiety and depression, lowered subjective well-being and lowered self-esteem. However, the results should be interpreted with caution due to a lack of power in some analyses.

A protocol for whole-exome sequencing in newborns with congenital deafness: a prospective population-based cohort

INTRODUCTION

The aetiology of congenital hearing loss is heterogeneous, and in many infants a genetic cause is suspected. Parents face a diagnostic odyssey when searching for a cause of their infant's hearing loss. Through the Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, a prospective cohort of infants will be offered whole-exome sequencing (WES) with targeted analysis in conjunction with chromosome microarray to determine the genetic causes of congenital hearing loss. Parents will also be offered the opportunity to receive additional results from their infant's WES.

METHODS

Eligible infants will be identified through the Victorian Infant Hearing Screening Program and offered an appointment in a paediatrician-run clinic, a genetics assessment and enrolment in the Victorian Childhood Hearing Impairment Longitudinal Databank. If parents consent to WES, genes causing deafness will be analysed and they can choose to obtain additional findings. For the additional results component, a modified laboratory protocol has been designed for reporting of results in the absence of a relevant phenotype. Parents' experience of being offered WES will be evaluated using surveys.

DISCUSSION

This project will provide descriptive analysis of the genetic aetiology of congenital hearing loss in this cohort and may provide data on genotype-phenotype correlations. Additionally, choices regarding additional findings will be analysed. Participants will represent a diverse cross section of the population, increasing the ability to generalise results beyond the study group. Evaluation surveys will allow analysis of preferences around counselling, usefulness of a decision aid and adequacy of information provision.

Outcomes of Children with Hearing Loss: Data Collection and Methods

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this article was to describe recruitment, data collection, and methods for a longitudinal, multicenter study involving children with bilateral mild to severe hearing loss. The goals of this research program were to characterize the developmental outcomes of children with mild to severe bilateral hearing loss during infancy and the preschool years. Furthermore, the researchers examined how these outcomes were associated with the child's hearing loss and how home background and clinical interventions mediated and moderated these outcomes.

DESIGN

The participants in this study were children who are hard of hearing (CHH) and children with normal hearing (CNH) who provided comparison data. CHH were eligible for participation if (1) their chronological age was between 6 months and 7 years of age at the time of recruitment, (2) they had a better-ear pure-tone average of 25 to 75 dB HL, (3) they had not received a cochlear implant, (4) they were from homes where English was the primary language, and (5) they did not demonstrate significant cognitive or motor delays. Across the time span of recruitment, 430 parents of potential children with hearing loss made contact with the research group. This resulted in 317 CHH who qualified for enrollment. In addition, 117 CNH qualified for enrollment. An accelerated longitudinal design was used, in which multiple age cohorts were followed long enough to provide overlap. Specifically, children were recruited and enrolled continuously across an age span of 6.5 years and were followed for at least 3 years. This design allowed for tests of time (period) versus cohort age effects that could arise by changes in services and technology over time, yet still allowed for examination of important developmental relationships.

RESULTS

The distribution of degree of hearing loss for the CHH showed that the majority of CHH had moderate or moderate-to-severe hearing losses, indicating that the sample undersampled children with mild HL. For mothers of both CHH and CNH, the distribution of maternal education level showed that few mothers lacked at least a high school education and a slight majority had completed a bachelor's degree, suggesting that this sample of research volunteers was more advantaged than the United States population. The test battery consisted of a variety of measures concerning participants' hearing and behavioral development. These data were gathered in sessions during which the child was examined by an audiologist and a speech-language examiner. In addition, questionnaires concerning the child's behavior and development were completed by the parents.

CONCLUSION

The Outcomes of Children with Hearing Loss study was intended to examine the relationship between variation in hearing ability across children with normal and mild to severe hearing loss and variation in their outcomes across several domains of development. In addition, the research team sought to document important mediators and moderators that act between the hearing loss and the outcomes. Because the study design provided for the examination of outcomes throughout infancy and early childhood, it was necessary to employ a number of different measures of the same construct to accommodate changes in developmental performance across age. This resulted in a large matrix of measures across variable types and developmental levels, as described in this manuscript.

Predictors of Psychosocial Outcomes in Hard-of-Hearing Preschool Children

Children with hearing loss are at risk for developing psychosocial problems. Children with mild to severe hearing loss are less frequently subject to research, in particular in preschool, and we therefore know less about the risk in this particular group. To address this, we compared psychosocial functioning in thirty-five 4-5-year olds with hearing aids to that of 180 typically hearing children. Parent ratings of psychosocial functioning and social skills, as well as scores of receptive vocabulary, were obtained. Children with hearing loss evidenced more psychosocial problems than hearing agemates. Female gender and early detection of hearing loss predicted better psychosocial functioning among children with hearing loss, whereas vocabulary and degree of hearing loss did not. Early intervention addressing psychosocial functioning is warranted for children with all degrees of hearing loss, including mild and moderate. Gender differences should be investigated in future research.

Children With Mild Bilateral and Unilateral Hearing Loss: Parents' Reflections on Experiences and Outcomes

Children with mild bilateral and unilateral hearing loss are now commonly identified early through newborn hearing screening initiatives. There remains considerable uncertainty about how to support parents and about which services to provide for children with mild bilateral and unilateral hearing loss. The goal of this study was to learn about parents' experiences and understand, from their perspectives, the impact of hearing loss in the mild range on the child's functioning. Parents of 20 children in Ontario, Canada, participated in the study. The median age of identification of hearing loss was 4.6 months (interquartile range: 3.6, 10.8). Parents appreciated learning early about hearing loss, but their experiences with the early process were mixed. Parents felt that professionals minimized the importance of milder hearing loss. There was substantial uncertainty about the need for hearing aids and the findings suggest that parents need specific guidance. Parents expressed concerns about the potential impact of hearing loss on their child's development, particularly at later ages.

Profile of patients assessed for cochlear implants

INTRODUCTION

Knowledge of the characteristics related to profound hearing loss is a matter of great importance, as it allows for the etiological and prognostic identification and strategic planning for public health interventions.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the different etiologies of hearing loss, age at diagnosis of the hearing loss, its relation to language acquisition, and the age at the first consultation in this service for cochlear implant assessment.

METHODS

This was a historical cohort, cross-sectional study, using retrospective analysis of the records of 115 patients with confirmed sensorineural hearing loss, who were followed in a university hospital, based on gender, age of hearing loss, age at the first consultation, language, and hearing loss etiology.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The majority of patients assessed for cochlear implants attend the first consultation when they are older than one year (an alarming mean of 3.8 years in the prelingual group) in spite of the early diagnosis of hearing loss. This reflects an already deficient health care system, in terms of referral. The idiopathic cause remains the most frequently identified. Among the known causes, the most prevalent are perinatal causes and meningitis.

Hearing difficulties in children with special health care needs

OBJECTIVE

To determine characteristics of children with special health care needs (CSHCN) with hearing difficulties including patterns of hearing aid use, comorbidity, and social and communication function.

METHODS

Bivariate and multivariable analysis of cross-sectional data on 40,723 children aged from birth to 17 years from the 2005-2006 National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs, including 1,982 (5%) with parent-reported hearing difficulties.

RESULTS

Among CSHCN, 383 (1%) used hearing aids, representing 20% of those with reported hearing difficulties. Odds of hearing aid use increased with age, primary language other than English, and lower income. More than half (58%) of the aided children reported hearing difficulties even with their aid. Among CSHCN with cerebral palsy, 13% had reported hearing difficulties and 3% used hearing aids. Equivalent figures for children with Down syndrome were 24% and 4%, mental retardation/developmental delay 12% and 5%, and autism spectrum disorder 9% and 2%. Overall, two-thirds of CSHCN with hearing difficulties had one or more sensory/developmental comorbidities; CSHCN with both hearing difficulties and a sensory/developmental comorbidity had highest odds of learning difficulties, speaking/communication difficulties, feeling anxious/depressed, acting out/bullying, and difficulty making friends. CSHCN with hearing difficulties alone, or sensory/developmental conditions alone had intermediate odds, after socio-demographic adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

Sensory/developmental comorbidities are common among CSHCN with hearing difficulties, and they are associated with higher odds of poorer social, communication, and educational function. Services for CSHCN must be equipped to address a range of hearing difficulties as well as sensory/developmental comorbidities and to improve social/emotional functioning as well as learning and communication.

NICU-only versus universal screening for newborn hearing loss: Population audit

AIM

Targeted newborn hearing screening for infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) may be considered when resources preclude universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS). However, process outcomes have not been compared between stand-alone NICU hearing screening programs and NICU screening within a full UNHS program.

METHODS

Comparison of two consecutive hearing screening programs delivered under similar conditions in the four NICUs in Victoria, Australia. All NICU infants were eligible for pre-discharge automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) hearing screening. Capture, referral and diagnostic data were collected for all NICU infants during the NICU-only (April 2003-February 2005) and subsequent UNHS (April 2005-June 2006) programs.

RESULTS

4704 eligible infants were admitted during the 23-month NICU-only period, and 3160 during the 15-month UNHS period. Double AABR using ALGO 3i equipment was planned for both programs but, due to clinician concern about this high-risk clinical population, the NICU-only protocol was amended to single AABR using AccuScreen equipment. Capture rates were 71.1% (NICU-only) vs. 95.4% (UNHS) (P < 0.001), successful follow-up rates were 85.8% vs. 96% (P= 0.004), and mean corrected age at the first audiology appointment was 51.5 vs. 40.2 days (P= 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

NICU screening offered within a larger UNHS program outperformed the stand-alone NICU hearing screening program on all measured parameters. Greater resourcing might address shortcomings of the stand-alone program but would also reduce its potential savings. The high loss to follow-up also argues against the often-advocated approach of referring all NICU infants for diagnostic audiologic testing, bypassing hearing screening altogether.

A large-scale newborn hearing screening in rural areas in China

OBJECTIVES

Newborn hearing screening has been successfully implemented in cities of China, but not in rural areas. This study aimed to provide guidance on implementing hearing screening in the rural areas of China.

METHODS

Subjects were 11,568 babies who were born in 5 counties of Hubei Province of China. Hearing screening followed a two-stage strategy with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs). Infants referred after the second-stage screening were tested by diagnostic auditory brainstem response (ABR).

RESULTS

The subjects screened included 10,665 (92.2%) normal newborns and 903 (7.8%) newborns with high-risk of hearing loss. While 8190 (70.8%) newborns passed the initial screening, 135 newborns failed in the re-screening, and 90 (66.7%) of these 135 newborns received diagnostic assessment. Finally, 58 infants were diagnosed as hearing loss, and the prevalence of congenital hearing loss among newborns in rural areas was 0.5% (58/11,568).

CONCLUSIONS

This large-scale newborn hearing screening in rural areas of Hubei Province of China demonstrated that the screening rate and referral rate for high-risk infants are low. Urgent measures should be taken by the government to promote newborn hearing screening in the rural areas.

Making targeted screening for infant hearing loss an effective option in less developed countries

Developing countries account for a disproportionate burden of infant hearing loss globally but the prospects of the more ideal universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) have been debated. The Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) of USA has consistently proposed targeted newborn hearing screening (TNHS) for such countries. This study therefore set out to examine the appropriateness of JCIH risk factors as a basis for TNHS in Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia. From a review of relevant literature published in PubMed in the last 10 years, evidence on the effectiveness of TNHS based on JCIH or other risk factors is sparse or limited. Consistent with the prevailing epidemiological profile of these countries additional putative risk factors not listed or more prevalent than those listed by JCIH such as maternal hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, lack of skilled attendant at delivery, non-elective cesarean delivery and infant undernutrition have been demonstrated besides consanguinity. While TNHS has intuitive appeal in resource-poor settings, it is likely to be fraught with diverse operational constraints that could significantly curtail its effectiveness in these two regions. Well-conducted pilot UNHS studies to determine context-specific risk factors, screening efficiency and the potential trade-offs are warranted in each country prior to embarking on TNHS where UNHS is not immediately practicable.

Newborn hearing screening in a developing country: results of a pilot study in Abidjan, Côte d'ivoire

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the feasibility of neonatal hearing impairment in newborn babies in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.

METHODS

It is a cross-sectional study in which all infants aged from 3 to 28 days, attending for Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) immunization in primary care centers or hospitalized in neonatal intensive care units (NICU), between July 2007 and March 2008, were included. Screening followed a two-stage strategy with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE). Infants referred after the second-stage screening were scheduled for diagnostic evaluation by diagnostic auditory brainstem response (ABR). The variables analyzed were: screening coverage, referral rates; return rates for second-stage screening and diagnostic evaluation, incidence of permanent hearing loss and age at diagnosis.

RESULTS

1306 newborns, of a total of 1495, were successfully screened, giving a screening coverage of 87.4%. The average age was 4.5 days (S.D.: 2.7), with 5.85 days (S.D.: 3.17) for the immunization group and 3.20 days (S.D.: 0.40) for the neonatal unit group. In total, 286 out of the 1306 infants (21.9%) were referred after the first-stage screening; out of which 193 (67.5%) return for the second stage. After the second-stage screening, 48 (16.8%) were scheduled for diagnostic evaluation (45 from NICU and 3 from primary care centers). The overall referral rate for diagnostic evaluation was 3.7% (48/1306). Only 18.75% of those referred (9/48) returned for evaluation, and seven of them (77.8%) were confirmed with hearing loss (2 from immunization group and 5 from neonatal unit group). The prevalence of permanent hearing loss in this screened population was 5.96 per 1000 (7/1174 babies who completed the screening) [95% I.C.: 5.62-6.30 per 1000]. The mean age at diagnosis was 22 weeks (S.D.: 8.3). The reasons for non-completed screening were, according to 62 mothers: no financial means, absence of hearing loss, fear of spouse reactions, lack of information about this test and deafness.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of permanent and early hearing impairment identified by this screening program was about 6 per 1000. Routine hearing screening of infants for the early detection of hearing loss is necessary in Côte d'Ivoire. It is possible to implement such a hearing screening, targeting all newborns, in primary health care centers and neonatal intensive care units.

Etiologies of hearing impairment among infants and toddlers: 1986-1987 versus 2001

OBJECTIVE

This study compares etiological factors for hearing loss, relevant neuro-sensory impairments and demographics between two groups of children referred for early hearing habilitation in Israel. Group I was referred in the years 1986-1987 (n=73) and group II was referred during 2001 (n=73).

METHODS

Family history, pregnancy, risk factors, developmental milestones, medical history, auditory brainstem response, tympanometry, otoacoustic emissions and behavioral audiometric results were retrospectively retrieved in 2003 from medical records at the MICHA Society for Deaf Children in Israel.

RESULTS

New referrals per year have doubled themselves over the 15 years that elapsed between 1986-1987 and 2001. No changes in gender and age at time of admission were found. The prevalence of mild-to-moderate hearing loss was higher in Group II while severe and profound hearing loss was more prevalent in Group I. Assisted reproductive technologies were involved only in Group II. There were more twin births and post-natal hypoxia in Group II. Rh incompatibility was reported only in Group I. Severe hearing loss was associated with younger age at admission. No significant associations were found between age at admission and etiology with the exception of the fact that children with genetic background were admitted at an earlier age. Since no significant association between genetic background and severity of hearing loss was found, it is conclude that the association between severity of hearing loss and age at admission did not account for changes in etiology in our sample.

CONCLUSIONS

Classic risk factors for hearing loss among infants and toddlers have not changed much over time, and the few changes that have been noticed are probably due to expanded medical knowledge and improved technologies.

Verificação do desempenho de crianças deficientes auditivas oralizadas em teste de vocabulário

TEMA: vocabulário expressivo de crianças deficientes auditivas oralizadas. OBJETIVO: verificar o desempenho de um grupo de crianças com perda de audição em um teste de vocabulário expressivo. MÉTODO: o Teste de Linguagem Infantil ABFW - Vocabulário foi aplicado em 21 crianças portadoras de deficiência auditiva de grau moderadamente severo a profundo divididas em três grupos, conforme suas idades: 3 anos a 4 anos e 11 meses, 5 anos a 6 anos e 11 meses e 7 anos a 8 anos e 11 meses. Estas crianças utilizavam predominantemente o código lingüístico oral para se comunicar. RESULTADOS: os indivíduos pertencentes aos diferentes grupos etários forneceram mais respostas corretas e processos de substituição ao nomearem as figuras solicitadas do que não designaram. Em geral, as crianças com idades entre 7 anos a 8 anos e 11 meses demonstraram melhor desempenho do que aquelas com idades entre 3 anos a 4 anos e 11 meses e 5 anos a 6 anos e 11 meses, cujos comportamentos foram semelhantes. CONCLUSÃO: as crianças demonstraram melhores desempenhos nos campos conceituais animais, meios de transporte e formas e cores; as crianças mais velhas mostraram maior conhecimento dos vocábulos na maioria dos campos conceituais. Ao verificar o desempenho destas crianças no Teste de Linguagem Infantil ABFW - Vocabulário, foi possível concluir que tal verificação permitiu a identificação dos campos conceituais em que as crianças possuem maior ou menor domínio, assim como o reconhecimento dos recursos que os sujeitos deficientes auditivos utilizam na tentativa de nomear. Estas informações permitem que o fonoaudiólogo enfatize os campos conceituais menos conhecidos pelas crianças e abordem os traços e atributos dos objetos já conhecidos por elas, antes de apresentá-lo.

The distraction test: the last word?

OBJECTIVE

Universal Newborn Hearing Screening (UNHS) programmes have been widely implemented, but their costs, benefits and long-term logistics remain to be clearly defined. There are few rigorous evaluations of alternative strategies. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of the distraction test component of the two-tiered Victorian Infant Hearing Screening Program (VIHSP).

METHODS

All babies born in the State of Victoria, Australia in 1993 who survived the neonatal period were screened for the presence of risk factors for hearing loss. Those at-risk were referred for Auditory Brainstem Evoked Response (ABR) screening by a professional audiologist. All others were screened by modified distraction test at age 7-9 months. This birth cohort was followed through age 6 for diagnoses of congenital hearing loss resulting in fitting of hearing aids. Estimates of false-positives, false-negatives, sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive values were determined for the distraction test as a population screen. Ages at diagnosis and aid fitting for screen failures with hearing loss were compared with current goals.

RESULTS

For targeted (moderate or greater-aided) losses, the distraction test yielded eight (0.02%) documented false-negatives (one severe and seven moderate) and an estimated 4265 (99%) false-positives. Distraction test sensitivity was 65%, specificity 91% and PPV 0.3%. Mean age at diagnosis for distraction test failures across all severities, including mild losses, was 23 (SD 18) months with a mean age at aid fitting of 26 (SD 20) months.

CONCLUSIONS

The distraction test screen generated large numbers of false-positives and a significant number of false-negatives, performing particularly poorly with moderate losses. Ages at diagnosis and aid fitting for screen failures were far older than currently accepted goals. There is little evidence that the distraction test can be made to work acceptably as a population-based screen.

Hearing impairment: a population study of age at diagnosis, severity, and language outcomes at 7-8 years

BACKGROUND

Better language outcomes are reported for preschool children with hearing impairment (HI) diagnosed very early, irrespective of severity. However, population studies of older children are required to substantiate longer term benefits of early detection.

AIMS

To study impact of age of diagnosis and severity of HI in a population cohort of 7-8 year old children.

METHODS

Eighty eight 7-8 year old children born in Victoria, who were (a) fitted with hearing aids for congenital HI by 4.5 years and (b) did not have intellectual or major physical disability were studied. Main outcome measures were Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (CELF) and Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT). Predictors were pure tone average (0.5, 1, 2 kHz) in better ear at diagnosis and age at diagnosis. Marginal (adjusted) means were estimated with general linear models.

RESULTS

Response rate was 67% (n = 89; 53 boys). Mean age at diagnosis was 21.6 months (SD 14.4); 21% had mild, 34% moderate, 21% severe, and 24% profound HI; mean non-verbal IQ was 104.6 (SD 16.7). Mean total CELF score was 76.7 (SD 21.4) and mean PPVT score 78.1 (SD 18.1). Age of diagnosis, adjusted for severity and IQ, did not contribute to language scores. In contrast, adjusted mean CELF and PPVT language scores fell sequentially with increasing severity of HI.

CONCLUSIONS

More severe HI, but not later diagnosis, was strongly related to poorer language outcomes at 7-8 years. Further systematic study is needed to understand why children with hearing impairment have good or poor outcomes.

Parent-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life in Children With Congenital Hearing Loss: A Population Study

OBJECTIVE

To report 1) health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in 7- to 8-year-old children with congenital hearing loss and 2) effects of severity and age of diagnosis on parent-reported child HRQoL.

METHODS

SETTING

State of Victoria, Australia.

DESIGN

Two population-based cohorts of 7- to 8-year-old children.

PARTICIPANTS

Cohort 1 consisted of 83 children (51 boys) fitted with hearing aids or cochlear implants for congenital hearing loss by 4.5 years, born before universal newborn hearing screening, and without intellectual disability (the Children with Hearing Impairment in Victoria OUTCOME Study). Cohort 2 consisted of 895 children representative of the Victorian 7- to 8-year-old school population (the 1997 Health of Young Victorians Study).

OUTCOME

The 28-item parent-proxy Child Health Questionnaire measure of HRQoL.

RESULTS

Response rate for cohort 1 was 67%; 22% had mild, 33% had moderate, 17% had severe, and 29% had profound hearing loss; and the mean nonverbal IQ was 105.4 (SD = 16.5). Children with hearing loss scored significantly more poorly than the normative sample on 6 Child Health Questionnaire scales (Role/Social-Physical, Behavior, Mental Health, Parent Impact-Emotional, Parent Impact-Time, and Family Activities) and on the Psychosocial Summary Score. HRQoL was poorer with milder losses, accounting for 10% and 11% of variance in the Physical and Psychosocial Summary scores, respectively. Age at diagnosis did not contribute significantly to the Summary scores, but only 11 children were diagnosed <6 months of age.

CONCLUSIONS

Parent-reported psychosocial well-being of 7- to 8-year-old children with hearing loss is poorer than that of their hearing peers. Future studies should determine whether HRQoL has improved after introduction of universal newborn hearing screening.

Outcomes of Children with Mild-Profound Congenital Hearing Loss at 7 to 8 Years: A Population Study

OBJECTIVES

Improved long-term outcomes of hearing loss at a population level is the underlying reason for interventions such as newborn hearing screening programs. Therefore, high-quality population surveys are needed for older children across the spectrum of hearing losses that might be detected by such programs, against which to assess future secular improvements. Measured outcomes should cover a broad range of parameters, including health-related quality of life.

DESIGN

Population-based cohort study (CHIVOS, the Children with Hearing Impairment in Victoria Outcome Study).

SETTING

State of Victoria, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighty-six 7- to 8-yr-old children born in Victoria, who were (a) fitted with hearing aids for congenital hearing loss by 4.5 yr and (b) had no intellectual or major physical disability.

MEASURES

Standardized measures of language (CELF and PPVT), articulation (Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation), cognition (WISC), reading, adaptive functioning, health-related quality of life, parent developmental concerns, parent- and teacher-reported intelligibility and behavior, and teacher-reported school functioning.

RESULTS

Response rate was 67% (N = 89). Of the 86 able to be included in analyses, 53 were boys; 22% had mild, 31% moderate, 17% severe, and 29% profound hearing loss; the mean nonverbal IQ was 104.6 (SD 16.7). The sample scored far below (1.3 to 1.7 SDs) the normative populations on the PPVT and on the Receptive, Expressive and Total CELF scores. On average, children's reading age was delayed nearly 10 mo. For every outcome measure except physical health, these children scored significantly worse than the relevant normative population. Language and vocabulary scores worsened with increasing severity of hearing loss, but adaptive functioning, health-related quality of life, academic skills and behavior did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Comprehensive data such as these highlight the continuing plight experienced by hearing-impaired children, and will help evaluate over time whether outcomes for children with hearing loss are improving at a population level.

Slight and mild hearing loss in primary school children

Although slight/mild sensorineural hearing loss affects about 3% of the school-aged population, with many more children having such impairments at single frequencies or in only one ear, little is known about its impacts on language, learning, and quality of life. This annotation explores what is known about prevalence and impact of this condition and argues for large-scale research to better address these issues.

Etiología de la hipoacusia severa/profunda bilateral pre/perilocutiva en cantabria

OBJECTIVE

To know the etiology of preiperlingual bilateral hearing loss in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All the patients diagnosed with bilateral severe/profound, pre or perilingual hearing loss at Sierrallana and Marqués de Valdecilla Hospitals (Cantabria, Spain) during the last 20 years were included in this study.

RESULTS

A hundred patients were diagnosed with bilateral severe/profound pre/perilingual hearing loss. The most frequent etiology was hereditary (49%), followed by severe perinatal hypoxia (11%), ototoxicity (5%), meningitis (3%), hyperbilirubinemia (3%) and rubella (2%). In 21% of cases was not known.

CONCLUSIONS

The two most frequent etiologies found in severe/profound hearing loss in children in our area were hereditary and non infectious perinatal problems. Infectious disease were scarce. Will decrease when genetic test were used as clinical basis.