Narrow-band ultraviolet B phototherapy in childhood

[Narrow-band medium-wave ultraviolet therapy in patients with atopic dermatitis: efficacy and safety]

For the treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis of moderate and heavy severity level, narrow-band medium-wave ultraviolet therapy (narrow-band phototherapy) can be used. An analysis of the results of studies of the efficacy and safety of narrow-band medium-wavelength ultraviolet therapy in patients with atopic dermatitis is presented, and a characteristic of the regimens of the phototherapy carried out is given. It has been shown that narrow-band phototherapy is an effective and safe method of treating patients with atopic dermatitis, but its effectiveness varies widely. Data were obtained on the absence of an increase in the effect during therapy with higher doses of radiation, about the higher efficiency of narrow-band phototherapy with concurrent medication, with an increase in the number of irradiation procedures, as well as in patients with a higher minimum erythemal dose, which indicates the possible existence of factors characterizing the individual characteristics of the response of patients to narrow-band phototherapy.

Off-Label Treatments for Pediatric Psoriasis: Lessons for the Clinic

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that affects up to 1.2% of children and adolescents. The treatment options for childhood psoriasis are often based on the same principles as in adults. However, most data on safety and efficacy derive from adult studies, and only a few of the frequently used treatments have achieved approval for use in children. The aim of this study was to review the current literature on off-label treatments for psoriasis in children and adolescents. We searched PubMed and identified 50 studies on off-label treatments. Of these, 23 studies were clinical trials (four randomized). There are only a small number of available studies on off-label treatments for children and adolescents with psoriasis, and many of these are retrospective reviews with few participants. Despite the current lack of studies, we still recommend the use of unapproved treatments since we have clinical experience with treatments such as topical corticosteroids, vitamin D analogs, and methotrexate that have shown promising effects. Regular clinical trials are needed to investigate the safety and efficacy of unapproved treatments. Due to The Pediatric Investigation Plans issued by The European Union, new drugs developed by pharmaceutical companies are required to undergo clinical trials in a pediatric population to get their application for marketing authorization processed. This will hopefully lead to much more data on the efficacy and safety of the new treatments, including treatments for children and adolescents with psoriasis.

Phototherapy in the Pediatric Population

Phototherapy has been used successfully to treat a wide range of pediatric skin conditions. It is a viable option in children with severe dermatologic disease or who have failed first-line treatments, and several studies have demonstrated its efficacy and safety in the pediatric population. Despite the growing body of evidence on the use of phototherapy in children, large controlled trials and long-term studies are lacking. Moreover, special considerations must be taken when using phototherapy in children. This review highlights the recent evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of phototherapy in children, with focus on the common light-sensitive pediatric skin conditions.

Use of Phototherapy in Children

BACKGROUND

Phototherapy is a well-recognized treatment in adults and children. Previous articles have reported success in treating recalcitrant skin disorders such as atopic dermatitis (AD), psoriasis, pityriasis lichenoides chronica, and vitiligo in children.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review over an 18-month period from June 2012 to December 2013 of all children receiving phototherapy in a tertiary pediatric dermatology center.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients 3 to 17 years of age (mean 10.6 years; 35 male, 40 female) were included. Forty-eight (64%) patients had AD and 21 (28%) had psoriasis. Seventy received narrowband ultraviolet B (NBUVB) treatment and five received hand and foot psoralen and ultraviolet A (PUVA) treatment. All patients with AD were treated with NBUVB and four (8.3%) were also treated with hand PUVA. After phototherapy, 76% had documented clear to almost clear skin. At the 12-month follow-up, 52% of the patients with AD remained clear. All 21 patients with psoriasis underwent NBUVB phototherapy. The clearance rate after phototherapy was 86%. At the 12-month follow-up, 43% of the patients with psoriasis remained clear.

CONCLUSION

Phototherapy can reduce disease burden in individuals with severe AD and psoriasis and should be considered as a second-line therapy if standard topical regimens are unsuccessful.