Intraarticular fractures of the distal end of the radius in young adults. A 16 (2-26) year follow-up of 42 patients

The evolution of radiological measurements and the association with clinician and patient reported outcome following distal radius fractures in non-osteoporotic patients: what is clinically relevant?

Introduction: Following distal radius fractures in young non-osteoporotic patients, clinical relevancy of outcome has been scarcely reported. Outcome can be put in perspective by using measurement errors of radiological measurements and Minimal Important Change when reporting on clinician and patient reported outcome. Aim of this study was to assess the clinical relevance of radiological measurements, clinician and patient reported outcomes following distal radius fractures in young non-osteoporotic patients.Methods: Retrospective cohort study. Non-osteoporotic patients following a distal radius fracture were selected. Radiographs of both wrists were obtained at baseline, 6 weeks and at follow-up. Active range of motion and grip strength measurements were obtained at the follow-up visit and 4 questionnaires were answered to assess pain, upper extremity functioning, and health status.Results: Seventy-three patients (32 women, 41 men) with a mean age of 33.5 (SD 9.2) years at the time of injury were included. Median follow up was 62 months (IQR 53.0-84.5). Several radiological measurements evolved statistically significantly over time, however none exceeded measurement errors. Flexion/extension difference of injured compared to uninjured wrist (mean difference 11.2°, t = -7.5, df = 72, p < 0.001), exceeded Minimal Important Change, while grip strength differences did not. When comparing patients with DRFs to healthy controls, only the differences on Patient Reported Wrist Evaluation subscales "pain", "function" and total scores exceeded minimal important change (8, 10 and 13 points, respectively). Multivariable regression analysis revealed statistically significant relationships between residual step-off and respectively diminished flexion/extension (B = -36.8, 95% CI -62; -11.1, p  =  0.006), diminished radial/ulnar deviation (B = -17.9, 95% CI -32.0; -3.9, p  =  0.013) and worse ShortForm-36 "mental component score" (B = -15.4, 95% CI -26.6; -4.2, p < 0.001).Conclusion: Radiological measurements following distal radius fractures seem to evolve over time, but differences were small and were probably not clinically relevant. Range of motion, in particular flexion/extension, was impaired to such extend that it was noticeable for a patient, whereas grip strength was not impaired. The Patient Reported Wrist Evaluation was clinically relevantly diminished. Residual articular incongruency seems to influence range of motion.Implications for rehabilitationReporting Minimal Important Change regarding clinician and patient reported outcome following distal radius fractures is of more clinical value than reporting on statistical significance.Following distal radius fractures, the changes in radiological measurements do not seem to reflect a clinical relevant change.Range of motion, in particular flexion/extension, should be measured following distal radius fractures, as this might be impaired in a clinically relevant way.Measuring grip strength is of less importance following distal radius fractures, because grip strength does not seem to be affected.Residual articular incongruency seems to influence range of motion and therefore should be reduced to a minimum when treating non-osteoporotic patients.

Deterioration of initially accepted radiological alignment of conservatively treated AO type-C distal radius fractures: mid-term outcome

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

It still remains controversial how often the once-accepted radiological alignment of an AO type-C distal radius fracture deteriorates after conservative treatment, and to what extent this deterioration is perhaps associated with patient-rated outcome measures (PROms). Thus, we aimed to evaluate this radiological deterioration and its association with mid-term functional follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 66 patients (mean age at fracture 53 years, SD 14.1, range 18-73, female 65%) with 68 C-type distal radius fractures at a mean of 6.7 years (SD 0.5 years, range 5.8-7.7 years) after primary closed reduction and cast immobilization. Radiographs of the wrists were taken and analysed for any radial shortening, dorsal tilt or step-off at the joint surface. Range of motion and grip strength were measured. In addition to the radiological result, primary outcome measures included Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QDash) and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE).

RESULTS

At mid-term follow-up, an acceptable anatomical radiological result was seen in only 22 wrists (32%). Deterioration of the once-achieved and accepted primary alignment was seen in a majority of cases (68%). Radial shortening of ≥ 2 mm was found in 34 wrists (51%, mean 4 mm, range 2-8 mm), with no association with QDash (12.8 vs. 5.5, p = 0.22) or PRWE (9.1 vs. 5.7, p = 0.40). Only four patients (6%) showed step-off at the joint surface (mean 1.1 mm, range 0.5-2 mm). Twenty-two wrists (32%) showed dorsal tilt of ≥ 10° (five with volar tilt of 15°-25°), with no effect on QDash or PRWE (14.7 vs. 6.5, p = 0.241 and 10.1 vs. 5.8, p = 0.226). Altogether, patients with dorsal tilt, step-off or shortening did not show significantly worse QDash (10.3 vs. 5.7, p = 0.213) or PRWE (8.1 vs. 5.1, p = 0.126) versus those with none. Twenty-nine (43%) of the patients had deficits in range of motion (ROM), either in extension (39%), flexion (43%), supination (16%) or pronation (4%), or combinations of these. Worse extension was associated with worse QDash (15.9 vs. 5.0, p = 0.037), flexion deficit with worse PRWE (11.5 vs. 4.4, p = 0.005) and supination deficit with both QDash (21.7 vs. 6.8, p = 0.025) and PRWE (18.9 vs. 5.2, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

The initially accepted radiological alignment of AO type-C radius fractures deteriorated in a majority of cases during conservative treatment. However, this deterioration was fairly mild and showed no significant association with functional outcome. Restricted ROM showed some association with PROms.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Prevalence of posttraumatic arthritis following distal radius fractures in non-osteoporotic patients and the association with radiological measurements, clinician and patient-reported outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Outcomes of non-osteoporotic patients who sustained a distal radius fracture (DRF) have not gained much attention in recent literature. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of posttraumatic arthritis (PA), to analyze associations of radiological measurements, clinician-reported and patient-reported outcomes (CROs and PROs) with PA and gain insight into employment changes after DRF in non-osteoporotic patients.

METHODS

Non-osteoporotic patients following a DRF were selected. Radiographs of both wrists were obtained at follow-up and the degree of PA was determined. Radiological measurements consisted of grading of PA, ulnar variance, radial length, radial inclination, dorsal tilt, distal radio-ulnar joint width, scapholunate dissociation, step-off and gap. Active range of motion and grip strength measurements were performed and all patients filled in four questionnaires to assess pain, upper extremity functioning, and health status (Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand; Patient Reported Wrist Evaluation; Michigan Hand Questionnaire; Short Form-36).

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients (32 women, 41 men) with a mean age of 33.5 (SD 9.2) years were included. Prevalence of PA was 32% at a median follow-up of 62.0 months. Patients with PA had statistically significant longer radial length (1.1 mm, 95% CI - 2.1; - 0.0, p = 0.045). Patients with PA had a statistically significant diminished flexion/extension arc of motion (12.0°, p = 0.008) and ulnar/radial deviation arc of motion (6.3°, p = 0.018). When corrected for dominance, all grip strength measurements were not statistically significantly different between patients with and without PA. Statistically significant poorer PROs in patients with PA were the MHQ subscales general functioning (65 versus 75, p = 0.018), esthetics (94 versus 100, p = 0.037), satisfaction (75 versus 92, p = 0.042) and total score of the MHQ (83 versus 91, p = 0.044), as well as the SF-36 subscale physical functioning (95 versus 100, p = 0.028). In regression analyses the DASH, PRWE function and PRWE total were statistically significantly associated with flexion/extension arc of motion. Seven patients (10%) changed or left their occupation because of the DRF.

CONCLUSION

Non-osteoporotic patients had a considerably high prevalence of PA following DRFs, despite a relatively short follow-up time. Patients with longer radial length more often had PA. Irrespective of AO/OTA fracture type, patients with PA had diminished range of motion, but no altered grip strength measurements. Non-osteoporotic patients following DRFs perceived diminished general functioning and dissatisfaction, which was impacted by the diminished active range of motion. Pain or impaired general health status was not reported. The PRO MHQ might be a valuable evaluation tool in this patient group. Change of occupation following DRFs should receive attention in further research.

Prevalence of posttraumatic arthritis and the association with outcome measures following distal radius fractures in non-osteoporotic patients: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this systematic review was to analyze (1) prevalence of radiological posttraumatic arthritis (PA), (2) associations of PA with outcome measures and (3) predictors of PA following distal radius fractures in non-osteoporotic patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nineteen studies were included (10 open source data).

RESULTS

In total, 733 patients were described with a weighted mean age of 37 years (range 25-54) at the time of the injury. Follow-up ranged from 13 months to 38 years. Overall prevalence of PA was 50% and 37% in the open source data. Radial deviation was significantly worse in patients with PA (N = 49, mean 14°, SD 6° versus N = 55, mean 17°, SD 6°, p = 0.037). No analysis could be performed regarding patient reported outcome measures, because of limited data. Articular incongruence was a significant predictor for PA.

CONCLUSIONS

A high prevalence of PA was found in non-osteoporotic patients following a distal radius fracture. PA following a distal radial fracture was associated with a limited radial deviation and flexion, but not with grip strength. Articular incongruence predicted PA. Patient reported outcome measures should be investigated more thoroughly to be able to understand the value of using these instruments in interpreting outcome in follow-up of non-osteoporotic patients following a distal radius fracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level of evidence 3 (Phillips et al. Levels of Evidence-Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine, 1).

Outcomes and cost of care for patients with distal radius fractures

This study was designed to evaluate treatment patterns in open treatment and percutaneous fixation of distal radius fractures, compare morbidity rates for the 2 types of treatment, and compare costs associated with the procedure and treatment of complications up to 1 year after surgery. From a 5% sample of nationwide Medicare claims records (1997-2009), patients with distal radius fractures were identified with International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM), codes. Patients who underwent percutaneous fixation and open treatment were tracked with appropriate Current Procedural Terminology codes. Complications were identified at 3 and 12 months. Medicare charges and payments associated with the treatment groups were compiled from the claims data. The rate of surgical treatment increased from 44.7 to 82.0 surgeries per 100,000 persons (+83.0%) over the study period. A total of 9343 procedures met the inclusion criteria between 1998 and 2008. The proportion of open treatment procedures increased from 25.5% in 1998 to 73.4% in 2008. Percutaneous fixation was associated with lower adjusted risk of carpal tunnel syndrome and release and mononeuritis at 3 and 12 months. The percutaneous fixation group had lower adjusted risk of malunion/nonunion at 3 months and tendon rupture at 12 months. Average charges were lower in the percutaneous fixation group for the index operation as well as for treatment of morbidities at 3 and 12 months. The operative fixation rate for distal radius fractures in the Medicare population continues to rise, with a significant trend toward open fixation. Charges and payments associated with open treatment are significantly higher than those for percutaneous fixation.

The epidemiology of distal radius fractures

Distal radius fractures are one of the most common types of fractures. Although the pediatric and elderly populations are at greatest risk for this injury, distal radius fractures still have a significant impact on the health and well-being of young adults. Data from the past 40 years have documented a trend toward an overall increase in the prevalence of this injury in both the pediatric and elderly populations. Understanding the epidemiology of this fracture is an important step toward the improvement of treatment strategies and the development of preventive measures with which to target this debilitating injury.

Variations in the use of internal fixation for distal radial fracture in the United States medicare population

BACKGROUND

Distal radial fractures affect an estimated 80,000 elderly Americans each year. Although the use of internal fixation for the treatment of distal radial fractures is becoming increasingly common, there have been no population-based studies to explore the dissemination of this technique. The aims of our study were to determine the current use of internal fixation for the treatment of distal radial fractures in the Medicare population and to examine regional variations and other factors that influence use of this treatment. We hypothesized that internal fixation of distal radial fractures would be used less commonly in male and black populations compared with other populations because the prevalence of osteoporosis is lower in these populations, and that use of internal fixation would be correlated with the percentage of the patients who were treated by a hand surgeon in a particular region.

METHODS

We performed an analysis of complete 2007 Medicare data to determine the percentage of distal radial fractures that were treated with internal fixation in each hospital referral region. We then analyzed the association of patient and physician factors with the type of fracture treatment received, both nationally and within each hospital referral region.

RESULTS

We identified 85,924 Medicare beneficiaries with a closed distal radial fracture who met the inclusion criteria, and 17.0% of these patients were treated with internal fixation. Fractures were significantly less likely to be treated with internal fixation in men than in women (odds ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.80 to 0.89) and in black patients than in white patients (odds ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.65 to 0.85). Patients were more likely to be treated with internal fixation rather than with another treatment if they were treated by a hand surgeon than if they were treated by an orthopaedic surgeon who was not a hand surgeon (odds ratio, 2.49; 95% confidence interval, 2.29 to 2.70). Use of internal fixation ranged from 4.6% to 42.1% (nearly a ten-fold difference) among hospital referral regions. The percentage of patients treated with internal fixation within a hospital referral region was positively correlated with the percentage of patients in that region who were treated by a hand surgeon (correlation coefficient, 0.34; p &lt; 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of internal fixation for the treatment of a distal radial fracture differs widely among geographical regions and patient populations. Such variations highlight the need for improved comparative-effectiveness data to guide the treatment of this fracture.

A systematic review of outcomes and complications of treating unstable distal radius fractures in the elderly

PURPOSE

As the population in developed countries continues to age, the incidence of osteoporotic distal radius fractures (DRFs) will increase as well. Treatment of DRF in the elderly population is controversial. We systematically reviewed the existing literature for the management of DRFs in patients aged 60 and over with 5 common techniques: the volar locking plate system, nonbridging external fixation, bridging external fixation, percutaneous Kirschner wire fixation, and cast immobilization (CI).

METHODS

We reviewed articles retrieved from MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL Plus that met predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria in 2 literature reviews. Outcomes of interest included wrist arc of motion, grip strength, functional outcome measurements, radiographic parameters, and the number and type of complications. We statistically analyzed the data using weighted means and proportions based on the sample size in each study.

RESULTS

We identified 2,039 papers and selected 21 papers fitting the inclusion criteria in the primary review of articles with a mean patient age of 60 and older. Statistically significant differences were detected for wrist arc of motion, grip strength, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, although these findings may not be clinically meaningful. Volar tilt and ulnar variance revealed significant differences among groups, with CI resulting in the worst radiographic outcomes. The complications were significantly different, with CI having the lowest rate of complications, whereas the volar locking plate system had significantly more major complications requiring additional surgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review suggests that despite worse radiographic outcomes associated with CI, functional outcomes were no different from those of surgically treated groups for patients age 60 and over. Prospective comparative outcomes studies are necessary to evaluate the rate of functional recovery, cost, and outcomes associated with these 5 treatment methods.

Nonbridging external fixation of distal radius fractures

Surgical management of distal radius fractures continues to evolve because of their high incidence in an increasingly active elderly population. Traditional radiocarpal external fixation relies on ligamentotaxis for fracture reduction but has several drawbacks. Nonbridging external fixation has evolved to provide early wrist mobility in the setting of anatomic fracture reduction. Several studies of the nonbridging technique have demonstrated satisfactory results in isolated nonbridging external fixation series and in comparison with traditional spanning external fixation. Nonbridging external fixation for surgical treatment of distal radius fractures can be technically demanding and requires at least 1 cm of intact volar cortex in the distal fracture fragment for successful implementation.

Clinical and radiological outcomes after stabilisation of complex intra-articular fractures of the distal radius with the volar 2.4 mm LCP

AIM

The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the results of the treatment of intra-articular fractures with the volar 2.4 mm LCP with regard to loss of reduction, clinical outcome and complications.

PATIENTS

Patients treated with a volar 2.4 mm LCP following a complex intra-articular distal radius fracture were assessed by clinical and radiological examination of both wrists, the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome instrument, Martini score and the pain Visual Analogue Scale score. Forty patients (40 fractures: 5 type C1, 11 type C2, and 24 type C3 according to AO/OTA classification) were followed at a mean 18 months from the injury.

RESULTS

Of the initial 40 fractures, 4 fractures required surgical revision (1 because of loss of reduction, 2 due to fracture incongruity as seen on the postoperative computer tomogram and 1 case of screw displacement in the radial shaft). Radiographs in the immediate postoperative period showed a radial inclination of 22.1 degrees, volar tilt of 7.2 degrees, and ulnar deviation of 0.2 mm (means). At follow-up examination, radial inclination was 23.8 degrees, volar tilt was 6.2 degrees and ulnar deviation was 0.9 mm (means). Average final wrist range of motion was significantly (p < 0.05) decreased in comparison to contralateral wrist. Average DASH and Martini scores were 18 and 27, respectively, with no significant differences between C1-, C2- and C3-type fractures. Patients who underwent a surgical revision had poorer Martini score. Complications were an EPL tendon rupture, a tendon irritation and a complex regional pain syndrome in a patient who underwent revision.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of complex intra-articular distal radius fractures with the volar 2.4 mm LCP provides sufficient fixation to prevent clinically significant loss of articular reduction, acceptable patient outcomes and minimal soft tissue complications.

Trends in the United States in the treatment of distal radial fractures in the elderly

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, distal radial fractures in the elderly have been treated nonoperatively with casting. However, since the introduction of the volar locking plating system in 2000, there has been an interest in the use of more aggressive treatment methods. The purpose of the present study was to assess changing trends in the treatment of distal radial fractures in elderly patients in the United States.

METHODS

We evaluated a 5% sample of Medicare data from 1996 to 1997 and a 20% sample from 1998 to 2005. Information on four treatment methods (closed treatment, percutaneous pin fixation, internal fixation, and external fixation) was extracted from the dataset. Other available data were diagnosis, physician specialty, and patient age, sex, and race. We calculated frequencies and rates to compare the utilization of different treatments over time.

RESULTS

Over the ten-year time period examined, the rate of internal fixation of distal radial fractures in the elderly increased fivefold, from 3% in 1996 to 16% in 2005. Closed treatment, however, remained the predominant method (used for 82% of the fractures in 1996 and 70% in 2005). Fractures in patients with an age of eighty-five years or more were significantly more likely to be treated in a closed fashion (p < 0.0001). There was a large variation among physician specialties with regard to the fixation methods that were used. Orthopaedic surgeons were significantly more likely to use closed treatment than hand surgeons were, whereas hand surgeons were significantly more likely to use internal fixation than orthopaedic surgeons were.

CONCLUSIONS

Since 2000, although the majority of distal radial fractures are still treated nonoperatively, there has been an increase in the use of internal fixation and a concurrent decrease in the rate of closed treatment of distal radial fractures in the elderly in the United States.

The reliability of measurements taken from computer-stored digitalised x-rays of acute distal radius fractures

Sixteen observers measured eight anatomical parameters on digitalised images of six acute distal radial fractures using the Patient Archiving Communication System software and repeated the measurements at least 2 weeks later. Inter- and intraobserver reliability was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients and tolerance limits. The highest interobserver agreement was demonstrated in the dorsal tilt (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.858; tolerance limit 14.2 degrees ). When compared with the results of a study looking at observer reliability in measurement of healed distal radial fractures, the reliability of computerised measurements is not significantly different from those achieved by manual techniques (dorsal tilt interobserver tolerance limits on computer system 16 degrees , compared to 15 degrees using ruler and protractor). These results suggest that the recommended radiological reduction limits for distal radius fractures of <10 degrees change in palmar tilt, <2 mm radial shortening, <5 degrees change in radial angle and a <1 to 2 mm articular step cannot be reliably measured.

Correlation between radiological parameters and patient-rated wrist dysfunction following fractures of the distal radius

The present study investigates the correlation between radiological parameters of wrist fractures and the clinical outcome expressed by objective clinical parameters and the level of patient-rated wrist dysfunction. Thirty consecutive cases of unstable distal radial fractures treated with closed reduction and percutaneous fixation were prospectively studied for a period of one year. The outcome parameters included objective clinical and radiological parameters and the previously described and validated patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) score. Analysis showed that for unstable (AO classification types 23-A2, -A3, -C1 and -C2) fractures the fracture type affects the range of wrist palmarflexion (p=0.04) and that the presence of postoperative articular 'step-off' affects the range of wrist dorsiflexion and the patient-rated wrist function at the final time of the study (p<0.01 and p=0.02, respectively). It is also shown that permanent radial shortening and loss of the palmar angle were associated with prolonged wrist pain (p<0.01 and p=0.03, respectively). Our finding that residual articular incongruity correlates with persisting loss of wrist dorsiflexion and wrist dysfunction contradicts the view that loss of articular congruity is associated with late development of articular degeneration but not with early wrist dysfunction. Additionally, this study failed to show any association between the fracture type and the functional outcome as rated by the patients.

The impact of osteoarthritis: implications for research

Osteoarthritis, the clinical syndrome of joint pain and dysfunction caused by joint degeneration, affects more people than any other joint disease. There are no consistently effective methods for preventing osteoarthritis or slowing its progression, and symptomatic treatments provide limited benefit for many patients. Osteoarthritis disables about 10% of people who are older than 60 years, compromises the quality of life of more than 20 million Americans, and costs the United States economy more than $60 billion per year. The incidence of osteoarthritis rises precipitously with age; as a result, the prevalence and burden of this disorder is increasing rapidly. Study of the patterns osteoarthritis incidence and prevalence shows that it occurs frequently in the hand, foot, knee, spine and hip, but rarely in the ankle, wrist, elbow, and shoulder, and the most important universal risk factors are age, excessive joint loading, and joint injury. Analysis of the impact of osteoarthritis raises questions that include: Why does the incidence increase progressively with age? Why are some joints rarely affected? How do mechanical forces cause joint degeneration? What biologic and mechanical factors slow or accelerate the rate of joint degeneration? Answering these questions could lead to effective methods of preventing osteoarthritis and slowing its progression.

AO and Frykman's classifications of Colles' fracture. No prognostic value in 652 patients evaluated after 5 years

We retrospectively assessed hand and forearm symptoms of 652 patients with a Colles' fracture, 5 years after the fracture, using a questionnaire. The contralateral forearm, which was free of major injuries or illnesses, was used as control. Forearm and hand symptoms were common and only one quarter of the fractured forearms were completely free of symptoms at the time of review, whereas four fifths of the control forearms had no symptoms. Nearly half of the patients complained of impairment in various activities and 8% had had to give up leisure activities or make special arrangements at work. Demographic, and most of the fracture-related factors, were not associated with the symptoms. Neither AO nor Frykman's radiographic classifications of the primary fracture were of any use for predicting the clinical outcome.

Closed reduction and external fixation of unstable fractures of the distal radius

The anatomical and functional outcome and complications after closed reduction and external fixation of unstable fractures of the distal radius were reviewed in 29 patients. The fractures were reduced by longitudinal traction and closed manipulation under fluoroscopic control, and the reduced position was retained by a standard half-frame Hoffmann external fixator for six to eight weeks. The mean follow-up time was four (3-7) years. The reduction failed in three patients after too early removal of the fixator (three to five weeks). For the rest of the patients the dorsal angulation, the radial length, the articular step-off, and the intra-articular gap between fragments were significantly improved. Twenty-two patients had excellent or good anatomical alignment and in seven it was fair. One patient had a superficial pin infection, six patients had transient paraesthesias, and one patient transient mild dystrophia. At follow-up one patient had some finger stiffness; this was the only persistent complication. The median Gartland and Werley functional score was 3. The functional end result was excellent or good in 22 patients, fair in four, and poor in three.

Intra-articular fractures of the distal end of the radius treated with an adjustable fixator system

Twenty-five wrists with comminuted, displaced, intra-articular fractures of the distal radius were prospectively treated with an adjustable external fixator for an average of 51 days. Twenty fractures (80% [20 of 25] were available for follow-up) in 16 adults (mean age, 34 years) were treated with the Wrist Jack external fixator system (Hand Biomechanics Lab, Sacramento, CA) and evaluated at a mean follow-up period of 25 months. Ten patients (12 fractures) sustained high-energy trauma with multiple injuries, while 6 patients (8 fractures) sustained isolated distal radius fractures. Percutaneous pins supplemented the fixation in 6 fractures. All fractures were reduced to restore articular congruity to within 1 mm. At follow-up, 5% were excellent, 75% good, 20% fair, and none as poor using the demerit point system of Gartland and Werley as modified by Sarmiento. Grip strength averaged 80% of the unaffected limb. Seventeen of the 20 fractures showed some evidence of articular incongruity at follow-up evaluation. Restoration of palmar tilt, radial inclination, radial length, and range of motion were at acceptable values. Subjective analysis confirmed 85% of the patients to have only occasional pain or none at all and 15% to have some pain with weakness or limitation of motion. Two patients required additional surgery: 1 underwent a Darrach procedure and the other a tendon transfer for a rupture of the extensor pollicis longus tendon. Results suggest that an external fixator system provides an additional alternative to the surgical armamentarium for an otherwise difficult fracture fixation problem.

X-ray film measurements for healed distal radius fractures

In order to understand the effect of malunion on functional outcome, it is essential that deformity be measured in a consistent manner. A standardized method of measuring eight anatomic parameters at the distal radius was developed. By this method, six x-ray films of healed distal radius fractures were subsequently measured by 16 raters. Rater agreement was quantified by using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Tolerance limits were developed in order to estimate the expected margin of error for each parameter. Parameters measured with high rater agreement include ulnar variance, palmar tilt, and radial shift; however, even experienced clinicians did not readily agree on the size of step and gap deformity. Using the method of tolerance limits, one would expect that two randomly chosen clinicians measuring step and gap deformity on a random x-ray film will differ by more than 3 mm at least 10% of the time. Similarly, repeat step or gap measurements by the same observer are expected to differ by more than 2 mm at least 10% of the time. In view of our inability to measure deformity more accurately, the concept of a specific relationship between a given degree of deformity and outcome must be questioned. Prospective research is needed in order to improve our understanding of the precise relationship between malunion and functional outcome.