Is the Frontal Assessment Battery reliable in ALS patients?

Feasibility and diagnostics of the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed at evaluating the diagnostic properties of the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) in non-demented ALS patients by addressing the Edinburgh Cognitive Behavioural ALS Screen (ECAS) as the gold standard, as well as by examining the association between its administrability and scores with motor-functional measures.

MATERIALS

N = 348 consecutive patients were administered the ECAS and FAB. Disease severity (ALSFRS-R), duration, progression rate (ΔFS), and stages (via King's and Milano-Torino systems) were considered. Administrability rates and prevalence of below-cut-off FAB scores were compared across clinical stages; regression models allowed to test whether, net of the ECAS-Total, motor features predicted the probability of the FAB not being administrable and of a defective FAB score. Intrinsic and post-test diagnostics were explored against a combined defective ECAS-Executive and ECAS-Fluency scores.

RESULTS

85.3% of patients managed to complete the FAB. FAB administrability rates decreased with advanced clinical stages, whereas the prevalence of below-cut-off FAB scores did not. The probability of the FAB not being administrable was predicted only by lower ALSFRS-R-bulbar and ALSFRS-R-upper-limb scores; no motor features, but the ECAS-Total, predicted a below-cut-off performance on the FAB. Raw and adjusted FAB scores showed high accuracy (AUC = .85 and .81, respectively) and good intrinsic and post-test properties.

DISCUSSION

The FAB is featured by optimal diagnostics for detecting executive deficits in ALS, provided that it can be administered according to its original, standardized procedure, and thus that patients have sufficiently spared motor abilities to complete the test.

Behavioural changes predict poorer survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

The Motor Neuron Disease Behavioural Scale (MiND-B) is a clinically validated tool that was developed to detect behavioural dysfunction in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The current study aimed to evaluate behavioural impairment using MiND-B, as well as cognitive dysfunction in ALS patients, and to determine their prognostic implications.

METHOD

Patients with a clinical diagnosis of ALS were prospectively recruited from a specialised multidisciplinary ALS clinic. Patients underwent behavioural assessment with the Motor Neuron Disease Behavioural Scale (MiND-B) and cognitive evaluation using the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (ACE). Primary outcome measure was selected as survival time, defined by time from assessment to time of death or censor date. Univariate assessment of survival effect was carried out using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis followed by cox regression analysis to assess the effect of MiND-B and ACE scores on survival time.

RESULTS

A total of 134 patients were included in the study. MiND-B testing determined that 59% were classified as having behavioural dysfunction, with deficits associated with a significantly shorter survival time (HR 2.53, p = 0.003, 95% CI 1.3-4.6). Furthermore, regression analysis demonstrated that for every 1-point reduction in the MiND-B score, risk of death increased by 3%. ACE testing established that 33% of the cohort had evidence of cognitive dysfunction. Patients with cognitive dysfunction on ACE testing had a significantly shorter survival time than patients without cognitive impairment (HR 2.0, p = 0.042, 95% CI 1.04-3.3).

CONCLUSION

The presence of behavioural and cognitive impairments in ALS patients was associated with poor survival. The MiND-B and ACE inventories are simple and efficient clinical tools that can be administered in the multidisciplinary ALS clinic, that aid in the prognostication of this patient population.

Strategy for screening cognitive impairment in Chinese patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

BACKGROUND

It is an economical strategy to design a screening method to decide which patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/ motor neuron disease (ALS/MND) should enter into the stage for further comprehensive neuropsychological investigation.

METHODS

59 patients (including 8 with frank dementia) were recruited. They underwent the extensive neuropsychological evaluation and short screening batteries, namely the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Peking Union Medical College Hospital version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-P) and the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB). Results of the extensive neuropsychological evaluation were set as the gold standard to diagnose cognitive impairment, and the effectiveness of screening tests were measured against them.

RESULTS

By comparing the sensitivity and specificity, we found that the combination of FAB plus both or either of the other 2 short batteries provided a satisfactorily high sensitivity, but none of these screening batteries was significantly associated with quantitative behavioral measurements among non-demented subjects, the Frontal Behavioral Inventory-ALS version (FBI-ALS).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of the FBI-ALS, the FAB, and the MMSE or the MoCA-P or both could effectively screen comorbid dementia, cognitive and behavioral impairment in ALS but this implicates a limited specificity. And the FAB needed to be validated in large Chinese sample.

The Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen (ECAS) for Japanese ALS and FTD patients

OBJECTIVE

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients might present with cognitive and behavioural abnormalities resembling frontotemporal dementia (FTD). The Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen (ECAS) was developed as an easy to administer cognitive screen for detecting these symptoms. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate a Japanese version of the ECAS.

METHODS

In this single centre observational study, 35 ALS patients and 28 healthy controls were enrolled. Three patients in the ALS group fulfilled the criteria for behavioural variant FTD (ALS-FTD) and the rest were grouped as ALS without FTD. Participants were subjected to the Japanese version of the ECAS. ALS patients were also subjected to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Frontal Assessment Battery, ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised, and respiratory function testing. Demographic and disease characteristics (e.g., sex, age at examination, and years of education) were also recorded.

RESULTS

Internal consistency and correlations with general cognitive screenings were sufficient in the Japanese adaptation. Executive functions were the most commonly affected ECAS domain, followed by fluency and language. Compared to control subjects, ALS patients without FTD had low scores in the ECAS ALS-specific functions but not in ALS-nonspecific functions. Meanwhile ALS-FTD patients markedly underperformed both in the ECAS ALS-specific and ALS-nonspecific functions. Furthermore, the Japanese ECAS score correlated positively with years of education and negatively with age at onset.

CONCLUSION

The Japanese version of the ECAS is a valid and useful screening tool to identify multiple types of cognitive impairment in ALS patients.

An overview of screening instruments for cognition and behavior in patients with ALS: selecting the appropriate tool for clinical practice

Objective: Patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) not only show motor deficits, but may also have cognitive and/or behavioral impairments. Recognizing these impairments is crucial as they are associated with lower quality of life, shorter survival, and increased caregiver burden. Therefore, ALS-specific neuropsychological screening instruments have been developed that can account for motor and speech difficulties. This study provides an overview and comparison of these screeners. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using Medline and Embase. Articles describing cognitive/behavioral screening instruments assessed in ALS patients were included. Screening instruments were compared on multiple factors, such as domains, adaptability, required time, and validation. Results: We included 99 articles, reporting on nine cognitive screeners (i.e. ACE-R, ALS-BCA, ALS-CBS, ECAS, FAB, MMSE, MoCA, PSSFTS, and UCSF-SB), of which five ALS-specific. Furthermore, eight behavioral screeners (i.e. ALS-FTD-Q, AES, BBI, DAS, FBI, FrSBe, MiND-B, and NPI) were reported on, of which three ALS-specific. Conclusion: Considering the broad range of cognitive domains, adaptability, and satisfying validity, the ALS-CBS and ECAS appear to be the most suitable screeners to detect cognitive and behavioral changes in ALS. The BBI appears to be the best option to screen for behavioral changes in ALS, since all relevant domains are assessed, motor-related problems are considered, and has a satisfactory validity. The MiND-B and ALS-FTD-Q are promising as well. In general, all screening instruments would benefit from additional validation research to gain greater insights into test characteristics and to aid clinicians in selecting screening tools for use in clinical practice.

Cognitive and behavioral status in Japanese ALS patients: a multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients may present with cognitive and behavioral abnormalities similar to frontotemporal dementia (FTD). In this multicenter study we examined Japanese ALS patients with and without FTD in order to characterize the full extent of cognitive and behavioral abnormalities, including associations with functional motor status, anxiety and depression.

METHODS

Patients were evaluated using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised, spirometry, and verbal fluency tests. Caregivers were asked to complete the ALS-FTD-Questionnaire (ALS-FTD-Q), a behavioral screen. We defined severe cognitive impairment (MoCA < 21 or FAB < 11), mild impairment (11 ≤ MoCA ≤ 25 or 11 ≤ FAB ≤ 15), and normal cognition (MoCA > 25 or FAB > 15). Severe and mild behavioral impairments and normal behavior were defined by the ALS-FTD-Q scores.

RESULTS

In 145 ALS patients, better cognitive scores were correlated with earlier age at onset, whereas a worse behavioral score was associated with a longer disease duration and higher level of anxiety and depression. Around seventy percent of all ALS patients showed mild (40-45%) or severe cognitive impairment with cognitive impairment outnumbering behavioral impairment fivefold. Cognitive functions were more impaired in patients with age of onset over 65 years, while behavioral scores were not related to age.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the high prevalence of in particular cognitive impairment, and the diversity of impairments, the cognitive and behavioral aspects of Japanese ALS patients should be given more attention clinically.

Frontal assessment battery and frontal atrophy in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

OBJECTIVES

To determine the potential utility of the frontal assessment battery (FAB) in assessing cognitive impairments in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), we investigated the association between the FAB score and regional gray matter volume, and ascertained whether the regional brain alterations related to cognitive impairments occur in relatively mild stage of ALS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-four ALS patients with a Mini-Mental State Examination score of >23, a normal score on the Self-Rating Depression Scale, little or no disturbance in speech and handling utensils on the ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS), and normal measures on respiratory tests (respiratory function test and arterial blood gas analysis), and two age-matched normal control groups (one for FAB assessment and the other for brain morphometry) underwent FAB testing and structural magnetic resonance imaging. We applied voxel-based morphometry to investigate the relationship between the FAB score and regional brain alteration, and assessed the relationship between the altered regional brain volume and ALSFRS or respiratory tests.

RESULTS

Frontal assessment battery scores were significantly lower in ALS patients than in normal controls. Volume reduction in the right orbitofrontal gyrus in ALS was correlated with a lower FAB score. There was no correlation between the right orbitofrontal gyrus volume and ALSFRS or respiratory tests.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that the FAB is an adequate tool for detecting cognitive impairments related to frontal lobe pathology in the relatively mild stage of ALS, independent of physical dysfunctions.

Screening for cognitive and behavioural impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Frequency of abnormality and effect on survival

OBJECTIVE

To screen for cognitive and behavioural impairment in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and controls with neuromuscular disease and to correlate these with clinical features.

METHODS

108 people with ALS and 60 controls with other neuromuscular diseases were recruited and assessed with the Addenbrooke's cognitive examination-III (ACE-III), the frontal assessment battery (FAB), and the executive function component of the Edinburgh cognitive and behavioural ALS screen (ECAS). The Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-Frontotemporal dementia questionnaire (ALS-FTD-Q) and the Motor Neuron Disease Behavioural instrument (MiND-B) were administered to the caregivers of people with ALS. The prevalence of abnormalities was determined and correlated with clinical features and survival. In 37 people with ALS, serial studies were performed.

RESULTS

The frequencies of cognitive impairment based on the ACE-III and FAB were 30.0% and 14.0%, in ALS and 11.7% and 3.3% in controls, respectively. Age and years of education influence the results of the ACE-III and ECAS executive function. In ALS, the frequencies of behavioural impairment based on ALS-FTD-Q and MiND-B were 32.1% and 39.4%, respectively. There is significant correlation of ALS-FTD-Q and MiND-B with the ALSFRS-R score. ALS participants with cognitive impairment measured with ACE-III had significantly shorter survival time than those without. ALS participants with behavioural impairment measured with ALS-FTD-Q had worse prognosis than those without. No significant difference was found between the first two serial cognitive tests based on ACE-III and FAB by using generalized estimating equation.

CONCLUSION

There is a greater frequency of cognitive impairment in people with ALS than in patients with other neuromuscular diseases. The cognitive and behavioural tests are potential biomarkers of the prognosis of ALS. The results of cognitive tests are stable over 6months and possibly longer.

Longitudinal assessment of the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Screen (ECAS): lack of practice effect in ALS patients?

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to assess whether controls and ALS patients show a practice effect in the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen (ECAS) on repeated longitudinal testing and if the ECAS detects progression of cognitive or behavioural changes over time.

METHODS

The ECAS was administered serially to ALS patients (n = 24 after six months, n = 10 after 12-18 months) and controls (n = 21 after six months). The ECAS was fully performed by all participants. For comparison purposes the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) was administered to a subgroup of 14 patients and 14 controls.

RESULTS

After six months controls showed a significantly higher overall score (p < 0.001) and significantly higher scores in all subdomains of the ECAS, except for visuospatial function and fluency. ALS patients showed no significant difference in any score of the ECAS after six months and up to18 months. Behavioural changes were increasingly, but not statistically, significant, noted by patient carers. The FAB was no longer applicable due to progressive motor deficits in 20% of ALS patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, in contrast to healthy controls, ALS patients show no practice effects. This could reflect 'pre-symptomatic' cognitive decline and progressive behavioural symptoms.

Impaired Perception of Emotional Expression in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Background and Purpose

The increasing recognition that deficits in social emotions occur in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is helping to explain the spectrum of neuropsychological dysfunctions, thus supporting the view of ALS as a multisystem disorder involving neuropsychological deficits as well as motor deficits. The aim of this study was to characterize the emotion perception abilities of Korean patients with ALS based on the recognition of facial expressions.

Methods

Twenty-four patients with ALS and 24 age- and sex-matched healthy controls completed neuropsychological tests and facial emotion recognition tasks [ChaeLee Korean Facial Expressions of Emotions (ChaeLee-E)]. The ChaeLee-E test includes facial expressions for seven emotions: happiness, sadness, anger, disgust, fear, surprise, and neutral.

Results

The ability to perceive facial emotions was significantly worse among ALS patients performed than among healthy controls [65.2±18.0% vs. 77.1±6.6% (mean±SD), p=0.009]. Eight of the 24 patients (33%) scored below the 5th percentile score of controls for recognizing facial emotions.

Conclusions

Emotion perception deficits occur in Korean ALS patients, particularly regarding facial expressions of emotion. These findings expand the spectrum of cognitive and behavioral dysfunction associated with ALS into emotion processing dysfunction.

Frontal assessment battery for detecting executive dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis without dementia: a retrospective observational study

OBJECTIVE

The frontal assessment battery (FAB) is a quick and reliable method of screening to evaluate frontal lobe dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). However, previous studies were generally conducted on small samples representing different stages of disease and severity. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the FAB in detecting executive functions and its association with demographic and clinical features in ALS without dementia.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING

A multidisciplinary tertiary centre for motor neuron disease.

PARTICIPANTS

We enrolled 95 consecutive patients with ALS diagnosed with El Escorial criteria in the period between January 2006 and December 2010.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We screened the patients with ALS using the FAB. An Executive Index (EI) was also calculated by averaging the Z scores of analytic executive tests evaluating information-processing speed (Symbol Digit Modalities Test--Oral version), selective attention (Stroop test) and semantic memory (Verbal Fluency Test).

RESULTS

The FAB detected executive dysfunction in 13.7% of the patients with ALS. Moreover, using the EI standardised cut-off, 37.9% of the patients with ALS showed executive dysfunction. The receiver-operating characteristic curve showed that the optimal cut-off for the FAB in the whole sample was 16, with a sensitivity of 0.889 (95% CIs 0.545 to 1.000), a specificity of 0.593 (95% CI 0.450 to 0.907) and a moderate overall discriminatory power of 0.809. Different levels of respiratory function, duration of disease and depressive symptoms did not affect the FAB validity.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ALS without dementia, a high prevalence of executive dysfunction was present. The FAB showed good validity as a screening instrument to detect executive dysfunction in these patients and may be used when a complete neuropsychological assessment is not possible.

ALS-Plus syndrome: non-pyramidal features in a large ALS cohort

OBJECTIVE

Autopsy studies show widespread pathology in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), but clinical surveys of multisystem disease in ALS are rare. We investigated ALS-Plus syndrome, an understudied group of patients with clinical features extending beyond pyramidal and neuromuscular systems with or without cognitive/behavioral deficits.

METHODS

In a large, consecutively-ascertained cohort of 550 patients with ALS, we documented atypical clinical manifestations. Genetic screening for C9orf72 hexanucleotide expansions was performed in 343 patients, and SOD1, TARDBP, and VCP were tested in the subgroup of patients with a family history of ALS. Gray matter and white matter imaging was available in a subgroup of 30 patients.

RESULTS

Seventy-five (13.6%) patients were identified with ALS-Plus syndrome. We found disorders of ocular motility, cerebellar, extrapyramidal and autonomic functioning. Relative to those without ALS-Plus, cognitive impairment (8.0% vs 2.9%, p=0.029), bulbar-onset (49.3% vs 23.2%, p<0.001), and pathogenic mutations (20.0% vs 8.4%, p=0.015) were more than twice as common in ALS-Plus. Survival was significantly shorter in ALS-Plus (29.66 months vs 42.50 months, p=0.02), regardless of bulbar-onset or mutation status. Imaging revealed significantly greater cerebellar and cerebral disease in ALS-Plus compared to those without ALS-Plus.

CONCLUSIONS

ALS-Plus syndrome is not uncommon, and the presence of these atypical features is consistent with neuropathological observations that ALS is a multisystem disorder. ALS-Plus syndrome is associated with increased risk for poor survival and the presence of a pathogenic mutation.

Screening for frontal lobe and general cognitive impairment in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

OBJECTIVES

Cognitive impairment occurs in up to 50% of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Simple tools are required to identify such individuals, as cognitive impairment adversely impacts quality of life and survival. Our objective was to determine the potential utility of the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in evaluating frontal lobe and general cognitive impairment, respectively. We also assessed the feasibility of screening for cognitive impairment in those patients with advanced physical disability by modifying selected FAB and MoCA subtasks.

METHODS

Fifty-four consecutive ALS patients were screened; 44 completed the FAB and 39 completed the MoCA. We administered modified tasks to patients with severe hand weakness or dysarthria. The patients were classified as cognitively impaired on each measure based on published cut-off scores of 14.11 on the FAB and 26 on the MoCA.

RESULTS

Twenty-one percent and 53% of patients were impaired on the FAB and the MoCA, respectively. Scores from patients receiving modified instructions did not differ from those completing standard versions. There were statistically significant correlations between the MoCA total scores and forced vital capacity (FVC) and ALSFRS-R scores. There was no correlation between these variables and the FAB.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the FAB and MoCA detected cognitive impairment in ALS patients. While the MoCA classified more patients as cognitively impaired than the FAB, the latter was more feasible for assessing patients with physical impairment. Simple task modifications proved effective in allowing patients with speech and motor impairments to undergo screening. Future studies are required to validate both measures, establish optimal cut-off scores, and validate modifications.