Who is Using Telehealth in Primary Care? Safety Net Clinics and Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs)

Telemedicine Implementation for Safety Net Populations: A Systematic Review

Background: Telemedicine systems were rapidly implemented in response to COVID-19. However, little is known about their effectiveness, acceptability, and sustainability for safety net populations. This study systematically reviewed primary care telemedicine implementation and effectiveness in safety net settings. Methods: We searched PubMed for peer-reviewed articles on telemedicine implementation from 2013 to 2021. The search was done between June and December 2021. Included articles focused on health care organizations that primarily serve low-income and/or rural populations in the United States. We screened 244 articles from an initial search of 343 articles and extracted and analyzed data from N = 45 articles. Results: Nine (20%) of 45 articles were randomized controlled trials. N = 22 reported findings for at least one marginalized group (i.e., racial/ethnic minority, 65 years+, limited English proficiency). Only n = 19 (42%) included African American/Black patients in demographics descriptions, n = 14 (31%) LatinX/Hispanic patients, n = 4 (9%) Asian patients, n = 4 (9%) patients aged 65+ years, and n = 4 (9%) patients with limited English proficiency. Results show telemedicine can provide high-quality primary care that is more accessible and affordable. Fifteen studies assessed barriers and facilitators to telemedicine implementation. Common barriers were billing/administrative workflow disruption (n = 9, 20%), broadband access/quality (n = 5, 11%), and patient preference for in-person care (n = 4, 9%). Facilitators included efficiency gains (n = 6, 13%), patient acceptance (n = 3, 7%), and enhanced access (n = 3, 7%). Conclusions: Telemedicine is an acceptable care modality to deliver primary care in safety net settings. Future studies should compare telemedicine and in-person care quality and test strategies to improve telemedicine implementation in safety net settings.

Telehealth Expansion, Internet Speed, and Primary Care Access Before and During COVID-19

Importance

Primary care (PC) receipt is associated with better health outcomes. How telehealth expansion and internet speed are associated with PC use is unclear.

Objective

To examine the association of telehealth and internet speed with PC use across sociodemographic determinants of health.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study performed difference-in-differences regression of the change in in-person and telehealth PC visits between pre-COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) (June 1, 2019, to February 29, 2020) and an initial (March 1, 2020, to May 31, 2020) and prolonged (March 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021) PHE period among continuously enrolled nonpregnant, nondisabled Wisconsin Medicaid beneficiaries aged 18 to 64 years. Data were analyzed from March 2022 to March 2023.

Exposure

PHE-induced telehealth expansion.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Change in PC telehealth (using Current Procedural Terminology codes) visits: (1) count; (2) visit share completed by telehealth; (3) percentage of PHE-induced visit decline offset by telehealth. High-speed internet (HSI) defined as living in a census block group with a median block maximum download speed of 940 megabits per second or greater (June 2020 Federal Communications Commission broadband data); other census block groups classified as low-speed internet (LSI).

Results

In the total cohort of 172 387 participants, 102 989 (59.7%) were female, 103 848 (60.2%) were non-Hispanic White, 34 258 (19.9%) were non-Hispanic Black, 15 020 (8.7%) were Hispanic, 104 239 (60.5%) were aged 26 to 45 years, and 112 355 (66.0%) lived in urban counties. A total of 142 433 (82.6%) had access to HSI; 72 524 (42.1%) had a chronic condition. There was a mean (SD) of 0.138 (0.261) pre-PHE PC visits per month. In the pre-PHE period, visit rates were significantly higher for female than male participants, non-Hispanic White than non-Hispanic Black individuals, urban than rural residents, those with HSI than LSI, and patients with chronic disease than patients without. In the initial PHE period, female participants had a greater increase in telehealth visits than male participants (43.1%; 95% CI, 37.02%-49.18%; P < .001), share (2.20 percentage point difference [PPD]; 95% CI, 1.06-3.33 PPD; P < .001) and offset (6.81 PPD; 95% CI, 3.74-9.87 PPD; P < .001). Non-Hispanic Black participants had a greater increase in share than non-Hispanic White participants (5.44 PPD; 95% CI, 4.07-6.81 PPD; P < .001) and offset (15.22 PPD; 95% CI, 10.69-19.75 PPD; P < .001). Hispanic participants had a greater increase in telehealth visits than Non-Hispanic White participants (35.60%; 95% CI, 25.55%-45.64%; P < .001), share (8.50 PPD; 95% CI, 6.75-10.26 PPD; P < .001) and offset (12.93 PPD; 95% CI, 6.25-19.60 PPD; P < .001). Urban participants had a greater increase in telehealth visits than rural participants (63.87%; 95% CI, 52.62%-75.11%; P < .001), share (9.13 PPD; 95% CI, 7.84-10.42 PPD; P < .001), and offset (13.31 PPD; 95% CI; 9.62-16.99 PPD; P < .001). Participants with HSI had a greater increase in telehealth visits than those with LSI (55.23%; 95% CI, 42.26%-68.20%; P < .001), share (6.61 PPD; 95% CI, 5.00-8.23 PPD; P < .001), and offset (6.82 PPD; 95% CI, 2.15-11.49 PPD; P = .004). Participants with chronic disease had a greater increase in telehealth visits than those with none (188.07%; 95% CI, 175.27%-200.86%; P < .001), share (4.50 PPD; 95% CI, 3.58-5.42 PPD; P < .001), and offset (9.03 PPD; 95% CI, 6.01-12.04 PPD; P < .001). Prolonged PHE differences were similar. Differences persisted among those with HSI.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of Wisconsin Medicaid beneficiaries, greater telehealth uptake occurred in groups with higher pre-PHE utilization, except for high uptake among Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black individuals despite low pre-PHE utilization. HSI did not moderate disparities. These findings suggest telehealth and HSI may boost PC receipt, but will generally not close utilization gaps.

Advancing equity in challenging times: A qualitative study of telehealth expansion and changing patient-provider relationships in primary care settings during the COVID-19 pandemic

Objective

The patient-provider relationship is critical for achieving high-quality care and better health outcomes. During the COVID-19 pandemic, primary care practices rapidly transitioned to telehealth. While telehealth provided critical access to services for many, not all patients could optimally utilize it, raising concerns about its potential to exacerbate inequities in patient-provider relationships. We investigated technical and workforce-related barriers to accessing telehealth and the impacts on patient-provider relationships for vulnerable populations.

Methods

Qualitative, semi-structured interviews from May 2021 to August 2021 with 31 individuals (medical directors, physicians, and medical assistants) working at 20 primary care practices in Massachusetts, North Carolina, and Texas. Thematic analysis to better understand how barriers to using telehealth complicated patient-provider relationships.

Results

Interviewees shared challenges for providers and patients that had a negative effect on patient-provider relationships, particularly for vulnerable patients, including older adults, lower socio-economic status patients, and those with limited English proficiency. Providers faced logistical challenges and disruptions in team-based care, reducing care coordination. Patients experienced technological challenges that made accessing and engaging in telehealth difficult. Interviewees shared challenges for patient-provider relationships as commonly used telephone-only telehealth reduced channels for non-verbal communication.

Conclusion

This study indicates that barriers to virtual interaction with patients compared to in-person care likely led to weaker personal relationships that may have longer-term effects on engagement with and trust in the healthcare system, particularly among vulnerable patient groups. Additional support and resources should be available to primary care providers to optimize telehealth utilization.

Telehealth Use by Pregnancy Stage Among Commercially Insured Patients in the United States, 2016-2019

Introduction: Relatively little is known about the proportion of maternal health services utilized through telehealth and whether rural-urban disparities in telehealth use exist throughout antenatal, delivery, and postpartum phases of maternal services. In this study, we describe patterns of care, including telehealth utilization, by rurality and racial/ethnic composition of the health service area during the antenatal, labor/delivery, and postpartum stages of pregnancy among commercially insured patients between 2016 and 2019. Methods: We present univariate and comparative descriptive statistics of patient and facility characteristics and site of care by the degree of rurality and racial/ethnic composition of the health service area (defined as geozips). The individual-level utilization data for 238,695 patients were aggregated to the geo-zip level (n = 404). Results: Between 2016 and 2019, 3.5% of pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum-related visits among commercially insured patients were delivered through telehealth. Telehealth use was higher in the antenatal (3.5% of claim lines) and postpartum (4.1% of claim lines) periods, compared with labor and delivery (0.7% of claim lines). We also found that the proportion of telehealth services (of total services billed) increased with the share of Black and Latinx residents at the geozip level. Discussion: Our findings highlight disparities in telehealth use, consistent with findings from studies using different data sources and time periods. Future research is needed to examine whether the relative differences in proportion of telehealth services, even if small, are associated with telehealth capacity in the hospital or community and why the proportion of telehealth services differs across community-level characteristics, specifically rurality and proportion of Black and Latinx residents.

Pilot Survey of Adoption of Telemedicine in Mohs Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic

BACKGROUND

The Covid-19 Pandemic prompted the widespread implementation of telemedicine across healthcare.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze telemedicine adoption by Mohs Micrographic surgeons (MMS) during the COVID-19 pandemic; to analyze the attitudes and perceived barriers to its long-term continuation by MMS practices.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

An online multiple-choice survey was distributed to members of the American College of Mohs Surgeons.

RESULTS

86.1% of surveyed Mohs surgeons initiated telemedicine during the pandemic surge. The most common uses for telemedicine amongst respondents were post-surgery management (77.4%), "spot checks" (60.9%), and surgical consultations (59.1%). 73.1% report patients were receptive to telemedicine. 68.6% believe that telemedicine has a place in dermatologic surgery; 49.5% plan to incorporate telemedicine into their surgical practices long-term. Physical exam limitations, fitting telemedicine into practice workflow, and patient reception/patient training were viewed as the most significant barriers to long-term implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

While valuable use cases for telemedicine were identified with most Mohs surgeon respondents feeling that telemedicine has a place in their practices, there is uncertainty in how to implement telemedicine into the dermatologic surgery practice workflow.

Telemedicine in a primary care clinic in Fairbanks, Alaska: Not a magic bullet for providing treatment during COVID-19

Stay-at-home orders due to the COVID-19 pandemic have increased patients’ reliance on virtual physician visits, via telemedicine. Telemedicine has benefits of use during the pandemic and has benefits outside of the pandemic. It is underutilized in certain types of medical organizations, providers, and among specific populations in the United States. It is important to understand the barriers to incorporating telemedicine effectively in the areas that it is underutilized, especially in rural locations. The researcher discussed the telemedicine expansion for two family practice doctors in Fairbanks, Alaska (AK). The family practice doctors experienced barriers that partially echo what has been stated in research. Research suggests that changes to Medicare and Medicaid telemedicine policies may not be enough to address these barriers. Other supports to expand telemedicine where it is needed includes providing more incentives to providers, waivers from insurance companies for patients to purchase equipment, and more education to patients about when, how, and where to receive telemedicine. More supports need to be provided to those underserved by telemedicine, especially for clients who are on Medicaid, living in low-income areas, and/or living in rural locations.

Telehealth for HIV Care Services in South Carolina: Utilization, Barriers, and Promotion Strategies During the COVID-19 Pandemic

To ensure continuing HIV care services during the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth has been recommended and implemented in numerous HIV-related facilities. This study aims to understand telehealth utilization for HIV care services in South Carolina (SC), identify barriers to telehealth during COVID-19, and investigate strategies to facilitate remote HIV care delivery. In-depth interviews with 11 management personnel from 8 HIV-related facilities in SC were analyzed using thematic analysis. Utilizations of telehealth were diverse in delivering medical and non-medical HIV care services. Barriers included technological challenges, digital literacy, client/provider experiences, low socio-economic status of client population, and reimbursement issues. Various strategies were mentioned for promoting telehealth utilization, from client empowerment, provider training to improved organizational readiness. For successful telehealth use during and after COVID-19, it is necessary to continue efforts to promote telehealth and remove barriers to telehealth by implementing inclusive multi-level strategies for non-technologically savvy or disadvantaged populations living with HIV.

Remote enrollment into a telehealth-delivering patient portal: Barriers faced in an urban population during the COVID-19 pandemic

Telehealth drastically reduces the time burden of appointments and increases access to care for homebound patients. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many outpatient practices closed, requiring an expansion of telemedicine capabilities. However, a significant number of patients remain unconnected to telehealth-capable patient portals. Currently, no literature exists on the success of and barriers to remote enrollment in telehealth patient portals. From March 26 to May 8, 2020, a total of 324 patients were discharged from Mount Sinai Beth Israel (MSBI), a teaching hospital in New York City. Study volunteers attempted to contact and enroll patients in the MyChart patient portal to allow the completion of a post-discharge video visit. If patients were unable to enroll, barriers were documented and coded for themes. Of the 324 patients discharged from MSBI during the study period, 277 (85%) were not yet enrolled in MyChart. Volunteers successfully contacted 136 patients (49% of those eligible), and 39 (14%) were successfully enrolled. Inability to contact patients was the most significant barrier. For those successfully contacted but not enrolled, the most frequent barrier was becoming lost to follow-up (29% of those contacted), followed by lack of interest in remote appointments (21%) and patient technological limitations (9%). Male patients, and those aged 40-59, were significantly less likely to successfully enroll compared to other patients. Telehealth is critical for healthcare delivery. Remote enrollment in a telemedicine-capable patient portal is feasible, yet underperforms compared to reported in-person enrollment rates. Health systems can improve telehealth infrastructure by incorporating patient portal enrollment into in-person workflows, educating on the importance of telehealth, and devising workarounds for technological barriers.

Intent to Adopt Video-Based Integrated Mental Health Care and the Characteristics of its Supporters: Mixed Methods Study Among General Practitioners Applying Diffusion of Innovations Theory

BACKGROUND

Most people with common mental disorders, including those with severe mental illness, are treated in general practice. Video-based integrated care models featuring mental health specialist video consultations (MHSVC) facilitate the involvement of specialist mental health care. However, the potential uptake by general practitioners (GPs) is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This mixed method preimplementation study aims to assess GPs' intent to adopt MHSVC in their practice, identify predictors for early intent to adopt (quantitative strand), and characterize GPs with early intent to adopt based on the Diffusion of Innovations Theory (DOI) theory (qualitative strand).

METHODS

Applying a convergent parallel design, we conducted a survey of 177 GPs and followed it up with focus groups and individual interviews for a sample of 5 early adopters and 1 nonadopter. We identified predictors for intent to adopt through a cumulative logit model for ordinal multicategory responses for data with a proportional odds structure. A total of 2 coders independently analyzed the qualitative data, deriving common characteristics across the 5 early adopters. We interpreted the qualitative findings accounting for the generalized adopter categories of DOI.

RESULTS

This study found that about one in two GPs (87/176, 49.4%) assumed that patients would benefit from an MHSVC service model, about one in three GPs (62/176, 35.2%) intended to adopt such a model, the availability of a designated room was the only significant predictor of intent to adopt in GPs (β=2.03, SE 0.345, P<.001), supporting GPs expected to save time and took a solution-focused perspective on the practical implementation of MHSVC, and characteristics of supporting and nonsupporting GPs in the context of MHSVC corresponded well with the generalized adopter categories conceptualized in the DOI.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of GPs may function as early adopters and key stakeholders to facilitate the spread of MHSVC. Indeed, our findings correspond well with increasing utilization rates of telehealth in primary care and specialist health care services (eg, mental health facilities and community-based, federally qualified health centers in the United States). Future work should focus on specific measures to foster the intention to adopt among hesitant GPs.

Telehealth In Health Centers: Key Adoption Factors, Barriers, And Opportunities

Telehealth services have the potential to improve access to care, especially in rural or urban areas with scarce health care resources. Despite the potential benefits, telehealth has not been fully adopted by health centers. This study examined factors associated with and barriers to telehealth use by federally funded health centers. We analyzed data for 2016 from the Uniform Data System using a mixed-methods approach. Our findings suggest that rural location, operational factors, patient demographic characteristics, and reimbursement policies influence health centers' decisions about using telehealth. Cost, reimbursement, and technical issues were described as major barriers. Medicaid reimbursement policies promoting live video and store-and-forward services were associated with a greater likelihood of telehealth adoption. Many health centers were implementing telehealth or exploring its use. Our findings identified areas that policy makers can address to achieve greater telehealth adoption by health centers.