Long-term outcomes of noninfectious uveitis treated with systemic immunomodulatory therapy: a retrospective case series

OBJECTIVE

To study the clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of patients with noninfectious uveitis (NIU) who are treated with systemic immunomodulatory therapy (IMT).

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

PARTICIPANTS

All consecutive cases of adults with NIU under the care of 5 uveitis subspecialty tertiary care clinics between 2010 to 2021 were included.

METHODS

Patient outcomes were assessed at initial presentation and at the latest available follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 418 NIU patients receiving IMT therapy with a median age of 46.0 years and 59.3% female were identified. Each patient required an average of 1.4 agents until achieving an optimal response. Following initial treatment with prednisone, patients were most commonly initiated on methotrexate. The top 3 treatments with the highest proportion of optimal treatment response when taken alone or in combination with other agents were infliximab (79.3%), cyclosporine (75%), and adalimumab (70%). The strongest predictors for requiring a greater number of IMTs trialed were younger age, panuveitis, and a chronic or recurrent disease course. Multivariable linear regression analysis suggested that baseline visual acuity at diagnosis was the only significant predictor of final visual acuity (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

NIU patients on IMT are often trialed on multiple therapeutic agents before achieving an optimal treatment response. Visual acuity at diagnosis is a predictor of final visual outcomes, whereas chronic or recurrent disease course, younger age, and panuveitis are predictors of requiring multiagent treatment regimens.

Anti-inflammatory medication use after cataract surgery: online survey of practice patterns

PURPOSE

To determine current prescribing patterns for topical or intraocular/periocular anti-inflammatory medications (AIMs) after routine cataract surgery.

SETTING

kera-net online members.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

METHODS

An online survey was distributed to subscribers of kera-net, a global online platform sponsored by the Cornea Society. Questions were asked regarding the use of topical or intraocular/periocular AIM after cataract surgery and types of medications prescribed.

RESULTS

Of 217 surgeon respondents (23% response rate), 171 (79%) practiced in the United States and 171 (79%) were cornea subspecialists. Most of the respondents (n = 196, 97%) prescribed topical corticosteroids after routine cataract surgery. The most frequently prescribed were prednisolone acetate (n = 162, 83%), followed by dexamethasone (n = 26, 13%), difluprednate (n = 24, 12%), and loteprednol etabonate (n = 13, 7%). Corticosteroids comprised (n = 40, 32%) of total intraocular/periocular injections, with triamcinolone acetonide 10 or 40 mg (n = 19, 47.5%) most commonly used. 23 surgeons (58%) who utilized intraocular/periocular corticosteroids also prescribed topical corticosteroids. Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were prescribed postoperatively by 148 surgeons (73%).

CONCLUSIONS

Most surgeons prescribed topical AIM after routine cataract surgery. Many surgeons injected intraocular or periocular AIM while prescribing topical AIM. The diversity of practice patterns may reflect the lack of clear evidence-based guidelines.

Pathogenesis and current therapies for non-infectious uveitis

Non-infectious uveitis (NIU) is a disorder with various etiologies and is characterized by eye inflammation, mainly affecting people of working age. An accurate diagnosis of NIU is crucial for appropriate therapy. The aim of therapy is to improve vision, relieve ocular inflammation, prevent relapse, and avoid treatment side effects. At present, corticosteroids are the mainstay of topical or systemic therapy. However, repeated injections are required for the treatment of chronic NIU. Recently, new drug delivery systems that may ensure intraocular delivery of therapeutic drug levels have been highlighted. Furthermore, with the development of immunosuppressants and biologics, specific therapies can be selected based on the needs of each patient. Immunosuppressants used in the treatment of NIU include calcineurin inhibitors and antimetabolites. However, systemic immunosuppressive therapy itself is associated with adverse effects due to the inhibition of immune function. In patients with refractory NIU or those who cannot tolerate corticosteroids and immunosuppressors, biologics have emerged as alternative treatments. Thus, to improve the prognosis of patients with NIU, NIU should be managed with different drugs according to the response to treatment and possible side effects.

Management of inflammation after the cataract surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review most recent studies and clinical trials regarding pathogenesis, treatment, and prevention of inflammation after the cataract surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

FLACS gave opportunity to evaluate inflammatory cytokines in the aqueous humour right after the laser procedure, which led to acknowledging the inflammation pathogenesis during the phacoemulsification. Although there is still a lack of evidence, which would prove the long-term benefit of NSAIDs, they are indicated and effective when risk factors for PCME are present. PREMED studies showed that combination of NSAID and steroids after the surgery for healthy subjects is cost-effective. The triamcinolone injection together with topical steroids and NSAIDs for diabetic patients after the cataract surgery was the most cost-effective in preventing PCME according to the PREMED. Dropless cataract surgery is another emerging topic: dexamethasone implants and suspensions look promising as we await more clinical trials with drug-loaded IOLs.

SUMMARY

Inflammation after the cataract surgery can be prevented, and these methods are one of the most essential topics with growing phacoemulsification rate. Topical NSAIDs are cost-effective not only for patients with risk factors for PCME but also for healthy subjects. New dropless techniques are being successfully introduced in the clinical practice.

Use of Systemic Mycophenolate Mofetil Therapy in Ocular Surface Inflammatory Pathologies at the Initiative and Responsibility of the Ophthalmologist

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of systemic mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) treatment in ocular surface inflammatory diseases.

METHODS

For this retrospective study, patients who were treated with systemic MMF for ocular surface inflammatory diseases between March 2020 and March 2022 were evaluated. Apart from demographic data, examination notes including MMF treatment indication and systemic side effect interrogation and routine laboratory examinations during drug treatment were extracted from the patient records. Detailed staging scores were performed according to the diagnosis including Foster and Mondino for ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) and limbal stem cell deficiency scoring for limbal transplantation. For thorough evaluation, anterior segment pictures were used.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were enrolled to the study, with a mean age of 58 ± 12. MMP (6, 42.8%) and limbal allograft transplantation (6, 42.8%) constituted the main indications for the MMF treatment, followed by keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness (KID) syndrome (1, 7.2%) and Mooren's ulcer (1, 7.2%). Five of six patients with MMP regressed according to both staging systems. Only one remained stable which was evaluated as Stage 3. Furthermore, while all limbal transplant groups (6) stabilized and showed regression according to the individualized limbal stem cell deficiency staging system with no rejection during follow-up. Furthermore, patients with Mooren's ulcer and KID syndrome showed control of the inflammation and stabilization after MMF treatment. No significant systemic side effects apart from constipation and nausea (3) were observed in patients whose routine laboratory tests were stable throughout the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

MMF has the potential to be a valuable and safe systemic agent of first choice in the control of ocular surface inflammatory disorders, especially when topical treatment is not effective. With such studies, it is predicted that MMF may reach wider usage areas with the increase in its effectiveness and safety in its use for ocular surface inflammatory pathologies.

Guidance on brolucizumab management recommendations

PURPOSE

Brolucizumab, a new generation anti-VEGF, has demonstrated efficacy and safety in AMD in the pivotal HAWK and HARRIER trials. Post-marketing, previously undetected adverse events related to intraocular inflammation have been reported. An independent post hoc review of the pivotal trials puts the rate of IOI at 4.6%. The aim of this paper is to propose a set of recommendations for implementing the management of brolucizumab in clinical practice.

METHODS

The recommendations made by the authors are based on their clinical experience, critical review of (i) the pivotal trials, the post-hoc analysis of the Safety Review Committee, (ii), and (iii) the published literature.

RESULTS

In the pivotal trials, brolucizumab showed sustained functional gains, superior anatomical outcomes with potentially longer intervals between injections and a well-tolerated overall safety profile. Adverse events reported post-marketing include retinal vasculitis and retinal vascular occlusion. Based on the available information, experts recommend (i) ruling out non-recommended patient profiles (prior history of ORI), (ii) screening the patient prior to each injection to rule out active ORI, (iii) monitoring the patient for early warning signs, and (iv) treating immediately should any adverse events develop.

CONCLUSIONS

The adverse events reported are rare, but may be associated with severe and irreversible loss of visual acuity. The recommendations made are intended to facilitate the management of brolucizumab in the routine practice of retinologists, to ensure patient safety and, should any adverse events occur, to minimise their impact on vision.

Efficacy and safety of intravitreal and periocular injection of corticosteroids in non-infectious uveitis: a systematic review

Uveitis is among the leading causes of visual loss in the working age population. In non-infectious uveitis, corticosteroids are the first line therapy. We sought to review systematically the evidence regarding the regional corticosteroid delivery modalities in the treatment of non-infectious uveitis. A five-database search (Pubmed, ISI Web of Science, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Scopus) was performed from inception to February, 2021. Nineteen studies with a total of 1935 eyes of 1753 patients were selected from 8922 abstracts retrieved by the initial search. The most frequently compared regimens were intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection and orbital floor triamcinolone acetonide injection (2 studies), intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection and posterior sub-Tenon triamcinolone acetonide injection (2 studies), and posterior sub-Tenon triamcinolone acetonide injection with the intravitreal dexamethasone implant (2 studies). Our results show that the intravitreal injection of corticosteroids is more effective, but is associated with more adverse events, than periocular injection. Some evidence supports the use of subconjunctival triamcinolone acetonide over intravitreal/periocular triamcinolone acetonide. Moreover, the overall results of 0.59 mg dosage of the intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide implant were superior to those from the 2.1 mg dose. The evidence, however, is not robust and further studies with standardized outcomes are warranted.

Kinetics of hydrocortisone sodium phosphate penetration into the human aqueous humor after topical application

AIM OF THE STUDY

Hydrocortisone is a soft steroid with low anti-inflammatory properties and a short duration of action, used to manage several ocular conditions. The clinical benefits and side effects associated with hydrocortisone are well documented, but its basic pharmacokinetic in the eye is yet to be fully elucidated. The purpose of this study is to investigate the anterior chamber penetration capabilities of hydrocortisone when used in different concentrations as eye drops treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a double-blind, single-centre, randomised clinical trial performed at the Department of Medicine and Surgery of the University of Perugia (Italy) on consecutive patients who undergone phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation. Patients were randomly assigned on the morning of surgery to receive a single instillation of 0.33% (group A) or 0.001% (group B) hydrocortisone sodium phosphate solution. Group of patients C did not receive any treatment and was used to measure the hydrocortisone endogenous levels. Before surgery, one aliquot of aqueous humor for each patient was aspirated. The time of collection for each sample was recorded. Hydrocortisone concentrations were then stratified into six interval classes of 30 minutes each.

RESULTS

The mean concentration of hydrocortisone was significantly higher in group A (25.2 ± 12.4 ng/mL) compared with group B (7.11 ± 1.51 ng/mL) and compared with the mean hydrocortisone endogenous levels (3.92 ± 1.18 ng/mL) (P < .0001). No statistically significant differences of hydrocortisone mean concentrations between group B and the mean endogenous levels were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the frequent need for prolonged topical steroid therapies and the possible consequent undesirable side effects, ophthalmologists should consider the lowest clinically effective dose of hydrocortisone useful to obtain the desired therapeutic effect and in an adequate time, to minimise the amount of steroids into the anterior chamber and to avoid side effects like intra-ocular pressure increase or cataract development.

Rituximab for treatment of non-infectious and non-malignant orbital inflammatory disease

PURPOSE

To provide a comprehensive review of rituximab use for the treatment of non-infectious/non-malignant orbital inflammation.

METHODS

Review of literature through January 2021.

RESULTS

Individual data was available for 167 patients with refractory non-infectious/non-malignant orbital inflammation who received treatment with rituximab (RTX). Rituximab was generally utilized as third-line or later treatment (108/149, 72.5%) at a mean of 44.6 months following the diagnosis of orbital inflammation (range = 0 to 360 months; median = 13.7 months). Patients with non-infectious/non-malignant orbital inflammation either received prior treatment with corticosteroids only (27/122, 22.1%), or with one (31/122, 25.4%), two (25/122, 20.5%), or three or more (25/122, 20.5%) corticosteroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents with or without corticosteroids before initiation of RTX treatment. The rheumatologic protocol (two infusions of 1 gram of RTX separated by 14 days) was utilized most frequently (80/144, 55.6%), followed by the oncologic protocol (four weekly infusions of 375 mg/m2 RTX; 51/144, 35.4%). Various other off-label regimens were used infrequently (13/144, 9.0%). Rituximab treatments resulted in a positive therapeutic response for the majority of patients with orbital inflammation (146/166, 88.0%). Commonly treated diagnoses included granulomatosis with polyangiitis (99/167, 59.3%), IgG-4 related disease (36/167, 21.6%), and orbital inflammation of indeterminate cause (25/167, 15.0%). No side effects were reported in 83.3% (55/66) of cases. The most common RTX-induced adverse event was an infusion-related temporary exacerbation of orbital disease (4/66, 6.1%), which occurred prior to the routine use of systemic corticosteroids as pre-conditioning.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, RTX appears to be both efficacious and well-tolerated as second- or third-line therapy for patients with non-infectious/non-malignant orbital inflammation.

Rituximab for non-infectious Uveitis and Scleritis

Purpose

To provide a comprehensive review of rituximab use for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis and scleritis.

Methods

Review of literature through December 2020.

Results

Individual data was available for 229 patients with refractory non-infectious uveitis (n = 108) or scleritis (n = 121) who received treatment with rituximab (RTX). Rituximab was generally utilized as third-line or later treatment (uveitis: 67/90, 74.4%; scleritis: 90/96, 93.8%) at a mean of 33.5 months following the diagnosis of uveitis (range = 0 to 168.0 months; median = 24.0 months) and 39.4 months after diagnosis of scleritis (range = 1.0 to 168.0 months; median = 21.0 months). Patients with non-infectious uveitis and scleritis either received prior treatment with corticosteroids only (uveitis: 18/90, 20%; scleritis: 4/94, 4.3%), or with one (uveitis: 19/90, 21.1%; scleritis: 30/94, 31.9%), two (uveitis: 11/90, 12.2%; scleritis 27/94, 28.7%), or three or more (uveitis: 37/90, 41.1%; scleritis: 31/94, 33.0%) corticosteroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents with or without corticosteroids before initiation of RTX treatment. The rheumatologic protocol (two infusions of 1 gram of RTX separated by 14 days) was utilized most frequently (uveitis: 45/87, 51.7%; scleritis: 87/114, 76.3%), followed by the Foster protocol (eight weekly infusions of 375 mg/m² RTX; uveitis: 18/87, 20.7%; scleritis: 10/114, 8.8%), and the oncologic protocol (four weekly infusions of 375 mg/m² RTX; uveitis: 5/87, 5.7%; scleritis: 6/114, 5.3%). Various other off-label regimens were used infrequently (uveitis: 19/87, 21.8%; scleritis 11/114, 9.6%). Rituximab treatments resulted in a positive therapeutic response for the majority of patients with non-infectious uveitis (81/97, 83.5%). Commonly treated uveitic diagnoses included non-paraneoplastic autoimmune retinopathy (30/107, 28.0%), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (21/107, 19.6%), Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (12/107, 11.2%), and Behçet disease (11/107, 10.3%). Cases of non-infectious scleritis were most commonly attributed to granulomatosis with polyangiitis (75/121, 62.0%) and rheumatoid arthritis (15/121, 12.4%), and showed an even greater rate of positive therapeutic response (112/120, 93.3%) following RTX treatment. No side effects were reported in 76.3% (74/97) of uveitis and 85.5% (71/83) scleritis cases. Of those cases associated with RTX-induced adverse events, the most common were infusion reactions of various severity (11/35, 31.4%).

Conclusions

Overall, RTX appeared to be both effective and well-tolerated as second or third-line therapy for patients with non-infectious uveitis and scleritis.

Steroid-eluting contact lenses for corneal and intraocular inflammation

Ocular inflammation is one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide, and steroids in topical ophthalmic solutions (e.g. dexamethasone eye drops) are the mainstay of therapy for ocular inflammation. For many non-infectious ocular inflammatory diseases, such as uveitis, eye drops are administered as often as once every hour. The high frequency of administration coupled with the side effects of eye drops leads to poor adherence for patients. Drug-eluting contact lenses have long been sought as a potentially superior alternative for sustained ocular drug delivery; but loading sufficient drug into contact lenses and control the release of the drug is still a challenge. A dexamethasone releasing contact lens (Dex-Lens) was previously developed by encapsulating a dexamethasone-polymer film within the periphery of a hydrogel-based contact lens. Here, we demonstrate safety and efficacy of the Dex-Lens in rabbit models in the treatment of anterior ocular inflammation. The Dex-Lens delivered drug for 7 days in vivo (rabbit model). In an ocular irritation study (Draize test) with Dex-Lens extracts, no adverse events were observed in normal rabbit eyes. Dex-Lenses effectively inhibited suture-induced corneal neovascularization and inflammation for 7 days and lipopolysaccharide-induced anterior uveitis for 5 days. The efficacy of Dex-Lenses was similar to that of hourly-administered dexamethasone eye drops. In the corneal neovascularization study, substantial corneal edema was observed in rabbit eyes that received no treatment and those that wore a vehicle lens as compared to rabbit eyes that wore the Dex-Lens. Throughout these studies, Dex-Lenses were well tolerated and did not exhibit signs of toxicity. Dexamethasone-eluting contact lenses may be an option for the treatment of ocular inflammation and a platform for ocular drug delivery. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Inflammation of the eye can happen either on the ocular surface (i.e. the cornea) or inside the eye, both of which can result in loss of vision or even blindness. Ocular inflammation is normally treated by steroid eye drops. Depending on the type and severity of inflammation, patients may have to take drops every hour for days at a time. Such severe dosing regimen can lead to patients missing doses. Also, more than 95% drug in an eye drop never goes inside the eye. Here we present a contact lens that release a steroid (dexamethasone) for seven days at a time. It is much more efficient than eye drops and a significant improvement since once worn, the patient will avoid missing doses.

Local delivery of corticosteroids in clinical ophthalmology: A review

Locally administered steroids have a long history in ophthalmology for the treatment of inflammatory conditions. Anterior segment conditions tend to be treated with topical steroids whilst posterior segment conditions generally require periocular, intravitreal or systemic administration for penetration. Over recent decades, the clinical applications of periocular steroid delivery have expanded to a wide range of conditions including macular oedema from retino-vascular conditions. Formulations have been developed with the aim to provide practical, targeted, longer-term and more efficacious therapy whilst minimizing side effects. Herein, we provide a comprehensive overview of the types of periocular steroid delivery, their clinical applications in ophthalmology and their side effects.

Do systemic steroids increase the risk of ocular complication in uveitis patients? Focus on a Italian referral center

INTRODUCTION

To describe the ocular inflammatory and iatrogenic complications in a cohort of uveitic patients treated in an Italian referral centre.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective non-comparative case series. Medical history and clinical findings of all consecutive patients referred to the uveitis center of Pisa University from January 2015 to January 2017 were reviewed. Only patients with at least three follow-up visits in our center were included in our series.

RESULTS

Three hundred and eighty-nine patients were visited in our center during study period; only 142 patients (90 men and 52 female) satisfied the inclusion criteria. Mean age at presentation was 41 ± 14 years. The most common ocular feature was anterior uveitis (46%) and was mainly unilateral. A specific etiological diagnosis was established in 61% of patients. At presentation, 71.43% of patients were on medical therapy for rheumatic disease; 42.86% of patients used systemic steroids Cataract and ocular hypertension were the most common ocular complications during the study period but were not statistically related to systemic steroid treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic steroids treatment in uveitis patients does not seem to increase the risk of iatrogenic complications such as cataract and glaucoma. In our series, increasing age appears to be the main risk factor for cataract and glaucoma development. Key points • Cataract, ocular hypertension, and glaucoma are the most common iatrogenic complications. • Systemic steroids can be safely used in uveitis patients.

Novel Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate Treatment (DSP-Visulex) for Noninfectious Anterior Uveitis: A Randomized Phase I/II Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

Frequent steroid drops represent a challenge in patient compliance. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of 5 minute topical dexamethasone sodium phosphate-Visulex (DSP-Visulex) treatment regimen (two applications on the first week then weekly after) compared to daily prednisolone acetate 1% (PA) for noninfectious anterior uveitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-four patients were randomized to 8% DSP-Visulex with placebo eye drops (8% group, n = 14), 15% DSP-Visulex with placebo eye drops (15% group, n = 15), or Vehicle-Visulex with PA eye drops (PA group, n = 15). Patients received daily eye drops and Visulex treatments on days 1, 3, 8, and 15 with an optional treatment on day 22. Efficacy measures were change in anterior chamber cell (ACC) count from baseline and proportion of patients with zero ACC count at days 8, 15, and 29. Safety measures were adverse events (AEs), visual acuity, ocular symptoms, and intraocular pressure (IOP).

RESULTS

ACC resolution over time was similar among the three groups. The percentage of patients with clear ACC was 18%, 22%, and 15% on day 8; 27%, 56%, and 54% on day 15; and 90%, 88%, and 77% on day 29 for the 8%, 15%, and PA groups, respectively. The numbers of reported AEs were 10, 36, and 12 for the 8%, 15%, and PA groups, respectively. Ten patients among all groups experienced treatment-related AEs, which included headache, eye pain, corneal abrasion, conjunctival/corneal staining, conjunctivitis, visual acuity reduction, and keratitis all of which were resolved during the timeframe of patients' participation in the study. IOP elevation was noted in the PA group throughout the study, whereas IOP elevation in the DSP-Visulex groups was observed at day 3 but not thereafter.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of the DSP-Visulex applications was comparable to the daily PA drops in the treatment of noninfectious anterior uveitis. Both 8% and 15% DSP-Visulex treatments were safe and well tolerated.

Aldo-Keto Reductases: Multifunctional Proteins as Therapeutic Targets in Diabetes and Inflammatory Disease

Aldose reductase (AR) is an NADPH-dependent aldo-keto reductase that has been shown to be involved in the pathogenesis of several blinding diseases such as uveitis, diabetic retinopathy (DR) and cataract. However, possible mechanisms linking the action of AR to these diseases are not well understood. As DR and cataract are among the leading causes of blindness in the world, there is an urgent need to explore therapeutic strategies to prevent or delay their onset. Studies with AR inhibitors and gene-targeted mice have demonstrated that the action of AR is also linked to cancer onset and progression. In this review we examine possible mechanisms that relate AR to molecular signaling cascades and thus explain why AR inhibition is an effective strategy against colon cancer as well as diseases of the eye such as uveitis, cataract, and retinopathy.

Retrospective Study Evaluating Treatment Decisions and Outcomes of Childhood Uveitis Not Associated with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate treatment, ocular complications and outcomes of children with pediatric uveitis not associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective chart review of pediatric uveitis in children under 16 years of age, recruited from the pediatric rheumatology department at Bicêtre Hospital from 2005 to 2015. Patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated and infectious uveitis were excluded. We used the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature Working Group to classify uveitis, disease activity, and treatment end points.

RESULTS

We enrolled 56 patients and 102 affected eyes. The mean age at diagnosis was 10 ± 3.5 years (range 3-15), and the mean follow-up 4.2 ± 3.3 years (1-15). The main diagnoses were idiopathic (55%), Behçet disease (15%), and sarcoidosis (5%). The main localization was panuveitis in 44 of 102 eyes (43%). Corticosteroid sparing treatment was needed in 62 of 102 eyes (60%). Second-line therapies included methotrexate and azathioprine, and the third-line therapy was a biologic agent, mainly infliximab, in 33 of 102 eyes (32%). Infliximab achieved uveitis inactivity in 14 of 18 eyes (80%), in all etiologies. Severe complications were present in 68 of 102 eyes (67%). The most common were synechiae 33% of eyes, cataract (20%), and macular edema (25%). Of these, 37% were present at diagnosis. Remission was achieved in 22 of 102 eyes (21%).

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional therapies were insufficient to treat many of the cases of posterior or panuveitis. This study underlines the need for earlier and more aggressive treatment and antitumor necrosis factor-α therapy was rapidly efficient in most cases of refractory uveitis.

A national survey of Canadian ophthalmologists to determine awareness of published guidelines for the management of uveitis

Background

The objectives of this study are to assess Canadian ophthalmologists’ awareness of established uveitis treatment guidelines and clinical management of uveitis and to assess the frequency of government applications for immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) and identify primary prescribers.

A 25-item questionnaire was sent to 759 practicing Canadian ophthalmologists. Six questions assessed demographics including the year of residency completion, training by uveitis specialists during residency, and fellowship training. Five questions assessed application of guidelines to clinical scenarios, and 12 questions assessed referral patterns and success of obtaining coverage for IMT.

Results

Of 144 respondents, 12 (8.3 %) were uveitis specialists; 45.1 % of respondents had uveitis training during residency by a uveitis specialist. Sixty-one percent reported awareness of management guidelines. Recent graduates (2001–2012) referred patients to uveitis specialists (55.3 %) less frequently than earlier graduates. Recent graduates also managed uveitis patients more frequently with corticosteroid injections (15.6 %) than those who graduated before 1980 (9.75 %). The majority (93.6 %) of respondents submitted less than six IMT funding applications for provincial drug coverage yearly, and 5.5 % reported prescribing IMT themselves, rather than referring to other specialists.

Conclusions

Although greater than half of respondents reported awareness of uveitis treatment guidelines, Canadian ophthalmologists’ awareness of uveitis treatment guidelines and application of the guidelines to patient care could be improved. Few applications are made for IMT, and the majority of applications are sent by non-ophthalmologists. This suggests the need for further education of ophthalmologist about uveitis treatment guidelines and for more ophthalmologists trained to manage uveitis with IMT.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12348-016-0102-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The Role of Alpha-MSH as a Modulator of Ocular Immunobiology Exemplifies Mechanistic Differences between Melanocortins and Steroids

Melanocortins are a highly conserved family of peptides and receptors that includes multiple proopiomelanocortin-derived peptides and five defined melanocortin receptors. The melanocortins have an important role in maintaining immune homeostasis and in suppressing inflammation. Within the healthy eye, the melanocortins have a central role in preventing inflammation and maintaining immune privilege. A central mediator of the anti-inflammatory activity is the non-steroidogenic melanocortin peptide alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone. In this review we summarize the major findings of melanocortin regulation of ocular immunobiology with particular interest in the ability of melanocortin to induce immune tolerance and cytoprotection. The melanocortins have therapeutic potential because their mechanisms of action in regulating immunity are distinctly different from the actions of steroids.

Red eye emergencies in primary care

Severe red eye conditions can be the result of intraocular inflammation, corneal insults or inflammation, and acute glaucoma. These pathologies require the knowledge and assessment tools of an ophthalmologist. This article will discuss red eye emergencies that the NP should promptly recognize and refer to ophthalmology.

Superoxide Dismutase 1 Nanozyme for Treatment of Eye Inflammation

Use of antioxidants to mitigate oxidative stress during ocular inflammatory diseases has shown therapeutic potential. This work examines a nanoscale therapeutic modality for the eye on the base of antioxidant enzyme, superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1), termed "nanozyme." The nanozyme is produced by electrostatic coupling of the SOD1 with a cationic block copolymer, poly(L-lysine)-poly(ethyleneglycol), followed by covalent cross-linking of the complexes with 3,3'-dithiobis(sulfosuccinimidylpropionate) sodium salt. The ability of SOD1 nanozyme as well as the native SOD1 to reduce inflammatory processes in the eye was examined in vivo in rabbits with immunogenic uveitis. Results suggested that topical instillations of both enzyme forms demonstrated anti-inflammatory activity; however, the nanozyme was much more effective compared to the free enzyme in decreasing uveitis manifestations. In particular, we noted statistically significant differences in such inflammatory signs in the eye as the intensities of corneal and iris edema, hyperemia of conjunctiva, lens opacity, fibrin clots, and the protein content in aqueous humor. Clinical findings were confirmed by histological data. Thus, SOD1-containing nanozyme is potentially useful therapeutic agent for the treatment of ocular inflammatory disorders.

Side-effects of anti-inflammatory therapy in uveitis

Uveitis is a group of inflammatory ocular conditions that cause significant visual morbidity around the world. Many of the cases of blindness secondary to uveitis can be avoided with adequate and aggressive management of the intraocular inflammation. Steroids have been utilized in the treatment of noninfectious uveitis for more than 60 years, but their chronic use is associated with severe ocular and systemic side-effects. Ophthalmologists are often not familiar with the systemic steroid-sparing agents available for the management of ocular inflammation and depend primarily on the use of corticosteroids. In this article, we review the most common agents utilized in the treatment of uveitis and their side-effect profiles.

[Therapy of intermediate uveitis]

Intermediate uveitis is a form of intraocular inflammation in which the vitreous body is the major site of inflammation. Intermediate uveitis is primarily treated medicinally and systemic corticosteroids are the mainstay of therapy. When recurrence of uveitis or side effects occur during corticosteroid therapy an immunosuppressive treatment is required. Cyclosporine A is the only immunosuppressive agent that is approved for therapy of uveitis in Germany; however, other immunosuppressive drugs have also been shown to be effective and well-tolerated in patients with intermediate uveitis. In severe therapy-refractory cases when conventional immunosuppressive therapy has failed, biologics can be used. In patients with unilateral uveitis or when the systemic therapy is contraindicated because of side effects, an intravitreal steroid treatment can be carried out. In certain cases a vitrectomy may be used.

Medical management of uveitis - current trends

Uveitis is a challenging disease to treat. Corticosteroids have been used in the treatment of uveitis for many years. Immunosuppressives are gaining momentum in recent years in the treatment of uveitis. In this article we present an overview of current treatment of uveitis and the major breakthroughs and advances in drugs and ocular drug delivery systems in the treatment of uveitis.

Successful factorial design for the optimization of methylprednisolone encapsulation in biodegradable nanoparticles

Due to their crystalline nature, the encapsulation of hydrophobic corticosteroids within polymeric nanoparticles by o/w solvent evaporation method is often difficult to achieve. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of both process and formulation parameters on the encapsulation of a model corticosteroid: methylprednisolone (MP). For this purpose, a 3(2)factorial design was performed evaluating the effects of the concentration of emulsifiers and sonication time on the manufactured nanoparticles, followed by a multiresponse optimization. The study also included the evaluation of other parameters such as the type of organic solvent used, polymer characteristics and the initial mass of drug. The optimal nanoparticle formulation using 0.25% (w/v) of emulsifying agent (Polyvinyl-alcohol, PVA) and 5 min of sonication was then characterized. The highest encapsulation was obtained with an organic phase consisting of acetone: dichloromethane (1:1), polyD,L-lactide-co-glycolide (PLGA) 50:50 as polymer and an initial mass of 6.6 mg of methylprednisolone. Nanoparticles size and ζ potential of optimized formulation were respectively around 230 nm and -14 mV. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) demonstrated that the drug was molecularly dispersed within the nanoparticles. Release study showed that MP-loaded nanoparticles sustained drug release for up to 120 h. This study reflects the importance of factorial design to optimize the manufacture of nanoparticles encapsulating hydrophobic drugs.