NutriSTEP®is Reliable for Internet and Onscreen Use

Is the online 'creating healthy eating and active environments survey' (CHEERS) tool reliable for early childhood educators in Alberta, Canada: a randomized crossover trial

BACKGROUND

The creating healthy eating and active environments survey (CHEERS) is an audit tool used to assess the nutrition and physical activity environment in early childhood education and care (ECEC) centres. Availability of the tool has been limited to paper-based versions. Digital health initiatives offer improved reach and immediacy of support for community-based clients through novel technology products. In order to provide increased access to the CHEERS tool, an online version was developed. The objective of this study was to assess the reliability of an online version of CHEERS.

METHODS

Utilizing a randomized crossover design, ECEC educators completed either a paper-based or online-based survey and then the opposite mode with a two to three-week interval. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC, with 95% confidence interval) was used to determine the reliability between test and retest. Absolute index of reliability in the original measurement was assessed through the standard error of measurement (SEM = SD × √1-ICC). The smallest amount of change not due to inherent variation was assessed by determining minimal detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC₉₅ = SEM × 1.96 ×√2; MDC₉₅% = MDC₉₅/mean ×100).

RESULTS

Test-retest reliability was good to excellent for the online-based CHEERS total score (ICC = 0.86) and for each of the four subscales: food served (ICC = 0.82), healthy eating environment (ICC = 0.76), program planning (ICC = 0.76), and physical activity environment (ICC = 0.79). The SEM, MDC_95, and MDC₉₅% for the CHEERS overall score were 0.79, 2.19, and 9.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrate that the online-based and paper-based versions of the CHEERS audit tool share comparable accuracy. The CHEERS tool can be reliably implemented in an online environment and this provides users an alternative means to complete the centre-based health assessment. The advantage of the online-based version includes user accessibility and the potential to develop a feedback response for participants using digitally collected data.

Prevalence of nutrition risk and associated risk factors among New Zealand pre-school children

AIM

To determine the prevalence of nutrition risk using the validated, Nutrition Screening Tool for Every Pre-schooler (NutriSTEP) among pre-school children in New Zealand (NZ) and to identify socio-demographic factors associated with nutrition risk.

METHODS

Parents/caregivers of NZ pre-school children (aged 2-5 years) completed an online survey including NutriSTEP, both parent and child height and weight, as well as socio-demographic characteristics. The 17-item NutriSTEP responses were scored between 0 and 4; where item scores ≥2 indicate risk, and the maximum score is 68. Participants were stratified into low-risk (score ≤ 20) and moderate to high-risk (score > 20) groups. Strength of associations between nutrition risk and socio-demographic characteristics were explored using binary regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of 505 pre-school children, 96 (19%) were at moderate to high risk (median interquartile range NutriSTEP score 24 [22-26]) and 409 (81%) were at low risk (score 13 [10-16]). Pre-school children at highest risk were non-NZ European (P = 0.002), with solo parents (P = 0.002), from households with incomes ≤$50 000 (P ≤ 0.021) and with non-university educated parents (P ≤ 0.0001). More than 30% of pre-schoolers were at high risk for inadequate consumption of fruit, vegetables, grains, milk products, meat and meat alternatives, as well as exposure to screens during meals and overuse of supplements.

CONCLUSIONS

A fifth of NZ pre-school children were at moderate to high nutrition risk and may not have met the nutrition guidelines. Economic and ethnic disparities were apparent. Using NutriSTEP may assist to identify NZ pre-school children at highest nutrition risk who may benefit from appropriate nutrition support.

Lifestyle Screening Tools for Children in the Community Setting: A Systematic Review

Screening of children’s lifestyle, including nutrition, may contribute to the prevention of lifestyle-related conditions in childhood and later in life. Screening tools can evaluate a wide variety of lifestyle factors, resulting in different (risk) scores and prospects of action. This systematic review aimed to summarise the design, psychometric properties and implementation of lifestyle screening tools for children in community settings. We searched the electronic databases of Embase, Medline (PubMed) and CINAHL to identify articles published between 2004 and July 2020 addressing lifestyle screening tools for children aged 0–18 years in the community setting. Independent screening and selection by two reviewers was followed by data extraction and the qualitative analysis of findings. We identified 41 unique lifestyle screening tools, with the majority addressing dietary and/or lifestyle behaviours and habits related to overweight and obesity. The domains mostly covered were nutrition, physical activity and sedentary behaviour/screen time. Tool validation was limited, and deliberate implementation features, such as the availability of clear prospects of actions following tool outcomes, were lacking. Despite the multitude of existing lifestyle screening tools for children in the community setting, there is a need for a validated easy-to-administer tool that enables risk classification and offers specific prospects of action to prevent children from adverse health outcomes.

Adaptation and reliability of 'Nutrition Screening Tool for Every Preschooler' (NutriSTEP) for use as a parent administered questionnaire in New Zealand

AIM

To adapt the validated Canadian Nutrition Screening Tool for Every Pre-schooler (NutriSTEP), for use in New Zealand and test its reliability to identify nutrition risk in pre-school children aged 2-5 years, as a parent administered questionnaire.

METHODS

Adaptations to the Canadian NutriSTEP were undertaken by three registered dietitians (expert review), followed by intercept interviews with pre-schooler parents (n = 26). A second expert review was conducted to finalise the adaptions for online reliability testing. A further 79 pre-schooler parents completed online administrations of the Canadian and adapted NutriSTEP tools, 4 weeks apart in a blinded manner. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to verify test-retest reliability between the administrations. Individual questionnaire items were verified for reliability between administrations through Cohen's κ statistic (κ), Pearson's χ² value and Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Online administrations of the Canadian and adapted NutriSTEP tools were determined to be reliable (ICC = 0.91; P < 0.001). Between NutriSTEP administrations, 13 out of 17 questionnaire items had adequate (κ > 0.5) agreement, one item had excellent agreement (κ > 0.75) with a significant relationship (P < 0.05) between all items. Sensitivity for the adapted NutriSTEP was higher for pre-schoolers at nutrition risk (31.6%) versus the Canadian version (20.3%). Risk items were highest for low intake of breads and cereals (58.2%), milk and milk products (51.9%), meat and meat alternatives (40.5%), child controlling the amount consumed (35.4%) and vegetable intake (34.2%).

CONCLUSION

The Canadian NutriSTEP and the adapted NutriSTEP were reliable between online administrations when completed by parents in the community. The adapted NutriSTEP identified an additional nine preschoolers at increased nutrition risk, demonstrating increased sensitivity in comparison to the Canadian NutriSTEP. Nutrition risk can be identified in early childhood to prevent the development of chronic disease. The adapted NutriSTEP should be considered for future use to identify preschoolers at increased nutrition risk and guide appropriate nutrition intervention.

Valid and Reliable Measure of Adherence to Satter Division of Responsibility in Feeding

OBJECTIVE

To examine the validity and psychometrics of sDOR.2-6y, a 12-item measure of adherence to the Satter Division of Responsibility in Feeding (sDOR).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

SETTING

Online respondents in central Pennsylvania.

PARTICIPANTS

117 parents (94% female, 77% White, 62% in ≥1 income-based assistance program) of preschoolers aged 2-6 years (28% moderate/high nutrition risk).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The sDOR.2-6y and Nutrition Screening Tool for Every Preschooler (NutriSTEP), a measure of child nutrition risk and other validated measures of eating behavior and parent feeding practices.

ANALYSIS

Relationships were evaluated with Pearson r, t tests, ANOVA, or chi-square. Factor structure was investigated using principal components analysis with varimax rotation. Binary logistic regression and general linear model controlling for low-income status compared with sDOR.2-6y and NutriSTEP scores. Linear regression predicted NutriSTEP and Satter Eating Competence Inventory 2.0 scores from sDOR.2-6y.

RESULTS

The sDOR.2-6y ranged from 16-32 (mean, 25.9 ± 3.3; n = 114). Parents of youth at nutrition risk had lower sDOR.2-6y scores (P = 0.004). Each 1 point sDOR.2-6y increase decreased nutrition risk odds by 21% (95% confidence interval, 0.675-0.918; P = 0.002). The sDOR.2-6y scores were higher with less restriction and pressure to eat (both P < 0.001) and were associated with feeding style. Specificity was 87% with sDOR.2-6y cutoff ≥24; sensitivity was 66% with cutoff ≥26.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The sDOR.2-6y accurately and reliably indicated adherence of low-income mothers to sDOR. Larger, diverse samples for future studies are recommended.