Effect of presence of calf on milking-induced release of prolactin and oxytocin during early lactation of dairy cows

Harnessing the value of reproductive hormones in cattle production with considerations to animal welfare and human health

The human population is ever increasing while the quality and quantity of natural resources used for livestock production decline. This calls for improved product efficiency and the development of improved and sustainable cattle production methods to produce higher quality products to satisfy the demands of both the modern and transient world. The goal of this review was to summarize the interactions, challenges, and opportunities in cattle production relating to their endocrine system, and how reproductive hormones and others impact economically important traits, animal welfare, and human health. A comprehensive literature search was conducted with a focus on analysis of natural hormones and the use of exogenous hormone administration for reproduction, growth, and development of beef and dairy cattle. Hormones regulate homeostasis and enhance important traits in cattle, including fertility, growth and development, health, and the production of both meat and milk products. Reproductive hormones such as testosterone, estradiol, progesterone, and related synthetics like trenbolone acetate and zeranol can be strategically utilized in both beef and dairy cattle production systems to enhance their most valuable traits, but the impact of these substances must account for the welfare of the animal as well as the health of the consumer. This scientific review provides a comprehensive analysis of the bovine endocrine system's impact on food animals and product quality which is vital for students, researchers, livestock producers, and consumers. Although important advances have been made in animal science and related technological fields, major gaps still exist in the knowledge base regarding the influence of hormones on the production and welfare of food animals as well as in the public perception of hormone use in food-producing animals. Filling these gaps through transformative and translational research will enhance both fundamental and applied animal science to feed a growing population.

Insights into the genetic variation of maternal behavior and suckling performance of continental beef cows

BACKGROUND

In beef cattle, maternal care is critical for calf survival and growth. Our objective was to evaluate the major sources of additive genetic variation in maternal behavior and suckling performance in two genetically close beef breeds.

METHODS

Maternal performance was assessed based on maternal behavior (MB), milk yield (MY) and udder swelling score (US) of 1236 Blonde d'Aquitaine cows and 1048 Limousin cows. MB was scored just after calving to describe the intensity of the dam's protective behavior towards her calf. Most of the cows were genotyped using the low-density chip EuroG10K BeadChip, and imputed to the high-density 770K panel within breed. Genetic parameters for each trait were estimated for each breed under a multi-trait best linear unbiased prediction animal model. Genomic analysis was performed for each breed using the high-density genotypes and a Bayesian variable selection method.

RESULTS

Heritabilities were low for MB (0.11-0.13), intermediate for MY (0.33-0.45) and high for US (0.47-0.64). Genetic correlations between the traits ranged from 0.31 to 0.58 and 0.72 to 0.99 for the Blonde d'Aquitaine and Limousin breeds, respectively. Two quantitative trait loci (QTL) were detected for MB in Blonde d'Aquitaine with NPY1R and ADRA2A as candidate causative genes. Thirty to 56 QTL were detected for MY and US in both breeds and 12 candidate genes were identified as having a role in the genetic variation of suckling performance. Since very few pleiotropic QTL were detected, there was little biological explanation for the moderate (0.57) to very high (0.99) genetic correlations estimated between MY and US in the Blonde d'Aquitaine and Limousin cows, respectively. In Blonde d'Aquitaine, the correlation was largely due to the pleiotropic QTL detected in the region upstream of the CG gene, while in Limousin, this region was only identified for US, thus attesting the difference in genetic architecture between the breeds.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings question the assumption that two populations that have close genetic links share many QTL. Nevertheless, we identified four candidate genes that may explain a substantial amount of the genetic variation in suckling performance of these two breeds.

Effect of premilking stimulation and milking frequency on milking-induced prolactin release in lactating dairy cows

Four experiments were conducted to investigate the factors controlling prolactin (PRL) release at milking. Each experiment used 9 dairy cows in mid-lactation in a 3 × 3 Latin square design. Experiment 1 evaluated the effect of premilking stimulation. The milking unit was attached after 0, 20, or 120 s of manual stimulation. Blood samples were collected from 20 min before to 60 min after milking-unit attachment. The peak value and total PRL release (area under the curve) were not affected by the treatments, but the 120-s stimulation hastened PRL release. Stimulation (20 or 120 s) increased the β-endorphin peak value (P = 0.02), but the magnitudes of PRL and β-endorphin releases were not correlated. Experiment 2 evaluated the effect of milking frequency. Cows were milked twice, at 7 AM and 7 PM; 3 times, at 7 AM, 1 PM, and 7 PM; or 7 times, at 7 AM, 9 AM, 11 AM, 1 PM, 3 PM, 5 PM, and 7 PM. The amount of PRL released at the 7 PM milking decreased as the number of milkings increased (P < 0.01), and peak values were smaller with 7 milkings than with 2 and 3 milkings (P < 0.05). Beta-endorphin release was not affected by milking frequency and not correlated with the magnitude of PRL release. Experiment 3 evaluated the effect of manual stimulation between milkings on milking-induced PRL release. Cows received no stimulation; 5 stimulations (5 min each), at 9 AM, 11 AM, 1 PM, 3 PM, and 5 PM; or 1 stimulation at 5 PM. Manual stimulation reduced (P < 0.5) the amount of PRL released and the maximum PRL concentration at the 7 PM milking, but no difference were found between 1 and 5 stimulations. Manual stimulation did not affect the amount of cortisol released but did impair milk ejection. Experiment 4 evaluated the effect of milking frequency on the PRL release induced by manual stimulation. Cows were milked at 7 AM only; at 7 AM, 9 AM, 11 AM, 1 PM, 3 PM, and 5 PM; or at 7 AM and 5 PM. All cows then received manual stimulation at 7 PM. Milking every 2 h or once 2 h before manual stimulation reduced the amount of PRL released and the maximum PRL concentration but did not affect cortisol release. In conclusion, the length of premilking stimulation has no significant effect on milking-induced PRL release, but increasing milking frequency reduces the amount of PRL released at milking. This effect is due not to the number of milkings or the amount of milk harvested during the milking but to the interval since the preceding milking.

Circannual changes in progesterone secretion in intact ewes, luteinizing hormone secretion in ovariectomized estradiol-implanted ewes, and prolactin secretion in three sheep breeds anticipated to differ in seasonality of reproduction

Changes in progesterone secretion in intact ewes (7 or 9 per breed) and luteinizing hormone secretion in ovariectomized, estradiol-implanted ewes (9 or 10 per breed) were monitored for 12 mo in Suffolk, tropically adapted St. Croix, and OOS ewes. The OOS line is a composite population of 50% Dorset, 25% Rambouillet, and 25% Finnish Landrace breeding that was selected for 10 yr for ability to lamb in October and early November. Ewes were isolated from rams, and blood samples were collected twice weekly. Circulating prolactin concentrations were also determined from blood samples collected near the summer and winter solstice and vernal and autumnal equinox. Intact OOS ewes entered anestrus later, began the subsequent breeding season sooner, and had a shorter seasonal anestrus than Suffolk and St. Croix ewes (P ≤ 0.005). St. Croix ewes did not differ from Suffolk ewes in date of onset or cessation of breeding or duration of anestrus (P ≥ 0.06). Breed differences in duration of luteinizing hormone inhibition in ovariectomized ewes were essentially identical to those observed for duration of anestrous. Prolactin concentrations varied during the year: annual changes were larger in relatively seasonal Suffolk ewes than in tropically-derived St. Croix ewes (P<0.01), and OOS ewes were intermediate to, and tended to differ from (P<0.10), the other two breeds. We conclude that OOS ewes developed by selection for fertility in spring matings had an abbreviated seasonal anestrus that is one of the shortest ever reported for temperate breeds, and that tropical St. Croix sheep did not have a shorter seasonal anestrus than Suffolk sheep under temperate conditions and ram isolation.

Effects of restricted nursing on milk production and collection, kid growth and plasma prolactin and growth hormone concentrations in dairy goats

The milk production of dairy goats under various regimes of mother-young contact from day 4 post partum were studied during the first 2 months of lactation, together with the prolactin (PRL) and growth hormone (GH) responses to udder stimulation. In the control group, 13 goats and their kids were left in permanent contact and did not undergo milking. In two additional groups, goats were machine milked once a day in the morning (at 0800 h) and kids were allowed 10 hours (from 1000 to 2000 h; 10H group, n = 11) or 5 h (from 1000 to 2000 h; 5H group, n = 11) of mother-young interaction per day. In the last group (MO, n = 10), mothers were permanently separated from their kids on day 4 post partum and milked once a day. Milk production during a 24-h period at 37 days post partum performed by controlled nursing and weighing of the kids (groups with kids) or by two machine milking 12 h apart (milking only group) revealed a higher production in the three groups with some mother-young contact than in the MO group. Total milk collected by milking over the 2 months of the study did not differ between the three groups that underwent milking. Kid weights at 2 months were 3.4 to 4.8 kg. lighter in the groups that underwent milking than in the control group. Hormonal profiles were significantly affected by restricted mother-young contact, with highest pre-stimulation concentrations of PRL and GH in the 5H group. Restricting mother-young contact from the first week postpartum can permit an early collection of milk without major effects on kid growth, when compared with one daily milking in goats totally separated from their young.

Patterns of estrous cycles, estrous behavior, and circulating prolactin in spring and summer in ewes selected for autumn lambing and exposed to ambient or long-day photoperiods

Estrous behavior in response to ambient and long-day photoperiods was evaluated in ewes developed by 10 years of selection for ability to lamb in autumn. Following October lambing, 67 ewes were moved indoors and exposed to long-day (16L:8D) or ambient photoperiods from February 2 until July 6. Two vasectomized rams with marking harnesses were housed with each group. Estrous behavior was monitored twice weekly. Ewes from the selection line were unresponsive to long days, with no effects on estrous behavior, frequency of ovulation, or circulating prolactin. Adult ewes were anestrus for only 34±3 d, but 2- and 3-years-old ewes were anestrus for 72±7 and 57±10 d, respectively. Frequencies of ovulation based on circulating progesterone concentrations in March, May, and June were 97%, 95% and 52%, respectively, indicating that many ewes that did not exhibit estrus still ovulated. Prolactin concentrations increased from 10 ng/ml in February to 27 ng/ml in March and 173 ng/ml in June but were not affected by light treatment. Ten ewes that failed to exhibit estrus behavior for at most 24 d during the main study were then monitored for 74 additional long days. Nine of 10 ewes did not exhibit estrus for periods similar to 1 or 2 estrus cycles during this period, but eight ewes re-initiated cycles by the end of the study on September 18. Selection for ability to lamb in autumn thus resulted in ewes with an abbreviated seasonal anestrus and reduced sensitivity to long days.

Effects of twice-daily nursing on milk ejection and milk yield during nursing and milking in dairy cows

Milk production and hormonal responses to milking in Holstein cows that were milked twice daily, and that either also nursed calves twice daily 2 h after milking for 9 wk after calving (n = 10) or that served as nonnursing controls (n = 8) were examined to assess how nursing affected responses to machine milking. Milk yield at milking during the 9 wk of nursing was lower in nursing cows compared with control cows (26.1 +/- 1.0 vs. 35.5 +/- 1.1 kg) that were only machine milked. During nursing, the amount drunk by calves increased from 6.5 +/- 0.7 kg/d on wk 1 to 12.5 +/- 1.4 kg/d on wk 9. When this was added to the amount of milk obtained at milking, nursing cows did not differ from control cows in total milk produced (35.5 +/- 1.0 vs. 35.5 +/- 1.0 kg). Residual milk yield, after i.v. injection of oxytocin after milking, was higher in nursing cows than in control cows (8.7 +/- 0.8 vs. 3.2 +/- 0.8 kg). During the 6 wk after weaning, milk production was the same for the nursing and control cows (34.0 +/- 1.35 vs. 34.7 +/- 1.42 kg). Plasma oxytocin levels during milking were greater for control cows than for nursing cows (31.7 +/- 5.4 vs. 18.0 +/- 2.8 pg/mL), but were equivalent to concentrations in nursing cows during nursing (35.5 +/- 7.5 pg/mL). Plasma concentrations of prolactin and cortisol increased after both milking (control vs. nursing: prolactin: 40.2 +/- 6.8 vs. 32.9 +/- 6.1 ng/mL; cortisol: 6.4 +/- 1.23 vs. 7.4 +/- 1.10 ng/mL) and nursing (control vs. nursing: prolactin: 18.6 +/- 7.3 vs. 38.9 +/- 6.6 ng/mL; cortisol: 2.34 +/- 1.15 vs. 7.37 +/- 1.04 ng/mL). In contrast to previous studies, there was no obvious advantage for milk production by keeping a calf with the cow. This appears to result from the reduced oxytocin secretion during milking for the nursing cows.

Hormone release and behavior during suckling and milking in Gir, Gir × Holstein, and Holstein cows1,2

There are several different milking management systems in Latin America, because Gir cattle are reputed to be easily stressed and not well adapted to machine-milking. This paper, therefore, provides an overview of hormone release and behavior during suckling and milking in Gir cows and their cross-bred offspring. Several experiments were performed to study oxytocin release during exclusive suckling or exclusive hand- and machine-milking, oxytocin, and prolactin release during a mixed suckling-milking system and oxytocin release after weaning. Cortisol concentrations and behavior were also examined. Concentration of oxytocin, released during suckling, and both types of milking were high, but the maximum concentration measured during suckling was significantly greater than that observed during exclusive milking. In the mixed suckling-milking system, the greatest oxytocin and prolactin releases were measured during suckling. Cortisol concentrations measured before, during, and after milking demonstrated that Gir x Holstein and Holstein cows were not stressed. On the other hand, although Gir had greater concentrations of cortisol, the percentage of residual milk for Gir cows was less than for dairy cows exposed to different stressful situations. In general, Gir cows and their crossbred offspring adapted to machine-milking, although these breeds can react negatively to milkers. Gir, Gir x Holstein, and Holstein cows all had similar cortisol levels during and after milking.

Induction of milk ejection and milk removal in different production systems

Milk ejection is important during milking or suckling to obtain the alveolar milk fraction, which can represent more than 80% of the milk stored in the udder of dairy cows. In response to tactile teat stimulation, either manually or by the milking machine, milk ejection is induced by the release of oxytocin and resultant myoepithelial contraction. The time from the start of tactile stimulation until the occurrence of milk ejection spans 40 s to > 2 min and increases with a decreasing degree of udder filling. Therefore, cows need a longer prestimulation in the late stages of lactation or if the milking is performed shortly after the previous milking, whereas in full udders prestimulation is less important. Milk ejection is disturbed under several conditions, such as during milking in unfamiliar surroundings (i.e., a novel milking environment) or for several weeks immediately after parturition in primiparous cows. Disturbed milk ejection is due to a reduction of or absence of oxytocin release from the pituitary. The severity of disturbed milk ejection and the coping capacity toward a novel milking environment is related to cortisol release in response to ACTH (i.e., adrenal cortex activity). Therefore, susceptibility of individual cows to the inhibition of oxytocin release and milk ejection can be predicted by an ACTH challenge test. Comfortable surroundings, such as feeding in and lighting of the milking parlor, can increase the secretion of oxytocin. Overcoming the lack of oxytocin release by injection of exogenous oxytocin for an extended time results in a reduction of the mammary response to endogenous oxytocin. In different production systems, it has to be verified that udder stimulation is sufficient to prevent disturbed milk ejection. Different brands of automatic milking systems induce a sufficient prestimulation of the udder, even if a few minutes are needed for a successful onset of the teat clusters. Specific breeds used for less intense milk production may need the presence of their calves for sufficient oxytocin release during milking. In conclusion, in all milk production systems, the maximal possible reduction of stress has to be targeted and proper udder prestimulation must be performed for an optimal milking of the cow by the farmer.

Naloxone cannot abolish the lack of oxytocin release during unexperienced suckling of dairy cows

To evaluate the role of opioids for the regulation of oxytocin release in response to teat stimulation, 10 brown-Swiss dairy cows were randomized to two experiments during mid of lactation. In the first experiment, four cows without previous suckling experience were suckled by an alien calf between two normal milkings. Before and during milking or suckling, frequent blood samples were collected via a jugular cannula for determination of oxytocin and beta-endorphin. In the second experiment, six cows were treated with naloxone or saline, 10min before the start of the first or second suckling, respectively. The collected blood samples were assayed for oxytocin.In the first experiment, the plasma levels of beta-endorphin were elevated during and after the unexperienced suckling in three cows, but not in the fourth cow, and the release of oxytocin during suckling was markedly reduced, suggesting no release of alveolar milk. In the second experiment, the release of oxytocin during suckling was again significantly reduced. Pretreatment with naloxone before suckling did not completely abolish the adverse effect of suckling and the oxytocin plasma level did not increase to levels comparable with control milking.In emotional stress situations, the release of oxytocin from the pituitary is inhibited with simultaneously elevated beta-endorphin plasma levels. Although there is some evidence for a regulatory role of opioids for the release of oxytocin, other mediators are suggested to be more potent in regulating oxytocin under stress conditions.

Relationship between frequent milking or suckling in early lactation and milk production of high producing dairy cows

Groups of 9 or 10 cows were assigned to one of three treatments 1) machine-milking three times daily, 2) machine-milking six times daily, and 3) suckling three times daily in addition to machine- milking three times daily. Treatments were conducted during the first 6 wk postpartum; thereafter, all cows were milked three times daily. During treatment, milk production was highest for suckled cows and lowest for cows milked three times daily. The DMI were similar for suckled cows and cows milked three times daily but higher for those milked six times daily. Body weight loss was greatest for suckled cows and least for cows milked three times daily. During wk 7 to 18 postpartum, cows milked six times daily exhibited a carry-over effect on milk production that was greater than that of other groups, During treatment, plasma growth hormone and IGF-I concentrations were elevated for suckled cows and, to a lesser extent, for cows milked six times daily. Prolactin and oxytocin similarly increased, but insulin decreased in suckled cows and, to a lesser extent, in cows milked six times daily. Posttreatment differences persisted for insulin and IGF-I, but not for the other hormones. Increased frequency of udder emptying increased milk production, and suckling was superior to machine-milking. High milk production was associated with elevated growth hormone, IGF-I, prolactin, and oxytocin, although cause and effect could not be established. The failure of suckled cows to increase feed intake to match output requires further investigation.

Effect of gestational mastectomy on postpartum gonadotropin releasing hormone and thyrotropin releasing hormone-induced luteinizing hormone and prolactin response in first lactation Holstein cattle

First lactation Holstein cows were divided into two treatment groups to evaluate thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH, 0.25 microgram/kg body weight) and gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH; 200 micrograms) induced secretion of prolactin (PRL) and luteinizing hormone (LH) on days 7 and 16 postpartum. Disregarding treatment, LH response was greater (p less than 0.01) on day 16 than day 7 postpartum (7.5 +/- 0.3 ng/ml on day 7 vs 10.2 +/- 0.3 ng/ml serum on day 16). Mastectomized cattle had similar time for initiation of LH increase, but peak concentrations were achieved later. Peak PRL concentrations were reached 12 to 15 min after injection and returned to baseline within 2.5 h in both groups. However, intact cows had higher (p less than 0.01) mean serum PRL than the mastectomized cows for 1 h following injection. Peak PRL concentration was 83.3 +/- 17.6 ng/ml for mastectomized cows vs 128.0 +/- 24.7 ng/ml for intact cows. It appears that udder removal allows for greater pituitary responsiveness to GnRH but diminishes PRL response to TRH suggesting the mammary gland differentially affects pituitary secretion of LH and PRL.

Lactogenic hormones: binding sites, mammary growth, secretory cell differentiation, and milk biosynthesis in ruminants

Roles of the lactogenic hormones prolactin and placental lactogen in mammary development in ruminants were reviewed. In contrast with other ruminants, failure to detect lactogenic activity in the serum of pregnant cows (in excess of that attributed to prolactin) suggests that placental lactogen may have little direct effect on mammary growth or lactogenesis. However, replacement and ablation experiments using ergocryptine provide definitive evidence that increased periparturient secretion of prolactin is necessary for maximal milk production in cattle. Quantitative microscopy indicates a relative failure of mammary cells in cows with inhibited secretion of prolactin to differentiate structurally. Prolactin induces synthesis and secretion of alpha-lactalbumin in prepartum bovine mammary tissue. Temporary disruption of mammary microtubules immediately prepartum in pregnant heifers reduced subsequent milk production, biosynthetic capacity, and cellular differentiation. For maximal milk production, mammary secretory cells apparently must respond to lactogenic hormone stimulation during the immediate periparturient period. Colchicine may desensitize the mammary epithelium to prolactin action. Membrane binding of radiolabeled human growth hormone to ruminant mammary gland provides a measure of lactogenic hormone binding sites. Specific binding to 600 micrograms of mammary membrane protein was 296% greater in lactating, compared with nonlactating, pregnant (65 days of gestation) ewes. Binding capacity (fmol/mg membrane protein) averaged 275 +/- 57 in mammary membranes from nonlactating, pregnant ewes (100 days gestation, n = 2) and 2,325 +/- 521 in mammary membranes from lactating ewes (n = 6, 14 to 21 days postpartum). Greater understanding of hormonal regulation of the ruminant mammary gland likely will result in development of techniques to produce milk more efficiently and perhaps capability to evaluate production potential of young animals.