Socioeconomic restraints and brain tumor surgery in low-income countries

The Association Between Socioeconomic Factors at Diagnosis and Survival in Medulloblastoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis and Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Medulloblastoma (MB) is the most common malignant brain tumor of childhood. The associations between socioeconomic statuses (SES) and survival outcomes of medulloblastoma remain unclear. The aim of this study was to develop a nomogram to predict medulloblastoma specific death (MBSD) and overall survival (OS) in patients with medulloblastoma, taking into account socioeconomic factors in patients with medulloblastoma.

METHODS

We included patients diagnosed with MB between 1975 and 2016 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was performed to reduce selection bias. Multivariate cox proportional hazards model was used to assess SES impact and clinically relevant variables of medulloblastoma specific death and overall survival. Independent prognostic factors determined by multivariate analysis were used to construct nomograms.

RESULTS

A total of 2660 patients were enrolled after matching. Study showed unemployed rate (MBSD, high level vs. low level, P = 0.020) (OS, high level vs. low level, P = 0.017), and marital status (OS, married vs unmarried/unknown, P = 0.029) were important factors affecting prognosis of medulloblastoma in male. Meanwhile, median household income (MBSD, quartile 1 vs. quartile 3, P = 0.047) (OS, quartile 1 vs. quartile 2, P = 0.017) (OS, quartile 1 vs. quartile 3, P = 0.014), residence (MBSD, urban vs. rural, P = 0.041), and insurance status (MBSD, insured vs. uninsured/unknown, P = 0.002)(OS, insured vs. uninsured/unknown, P = 0.001) were significant factors affecting prognosis of medulloblastoma in female. Through the calibration plot and C-index test, our nomogram was also of predictive significance.

CONCLUSIONS

The unique features of MB have provided a scenario for analysis of the impact of racial, ethnic, gender, and socioeconomic factors. The current findings have important public health implications for achieving the goal of a healthy population. Given the known morbidity rates, long-term psychological, financial and medical burdens that these children and their families must bear, it is critical to identify and address these gaps.

Variation in postoperative outcomes of patients with intracranial tumors: insights from a prospective international cohort study during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the international variation in surgical neuro-oncology practice and 30-day outcomes of patients who had surgery for an intracranial tumor during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

We prospectively included adults aged ≥18 years who underwent surgery for a malignant or benign intracranial tumor across 55 international hospitals from 26 countries. Each participating hospital recorded cases for 3 consecutive months from the start of the pandemic. We categorized patients' location by World Bank income groups (high [HIC], upper-middle [UMIC], and low- and lower-middle [LLMIC]). Main outcomes were a change from routine management, SARS-CoV-2 infection, and 30-day mortality. We used a Bayesian multilevel logistic regression stratified by hospitals and adjusted for key confounders to estimate the association between income groups and mortality.

RESULTS

Among 1016 patients, the number of patients in each income group was 765 (75.3%) in HIC, 142 (14.0%) in UMIC, and 109 (10.7%) in LLMIC. The management of 200 (19.8%) patients changed from usual care, most commonly delayed surgery. Within 30 days after surgery, 14 (1.4%) patients had a COVID-19 diagnosis and 39 (3.8%) patients died. In the multivariable model, LLMIC was associated with increased mortality (odds ratio 2.83, 95% credible interval 1.37-5.74) compared to HIC.

CONCLUSIONS

The first wave of the pandemic had a significant impact on surgical decision-making. While the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection within 30 days after surgery was low, there was a disparity in mortality between countries and this warrants further examination to identify any modifiable factors.

An economic study of neuro-oncological patients in a large developing country: a cost analysis

BACKGROUND

Neuro-oncological patients require specialized medical care. However, the data on the costs incurred for such specialized care in developing countries are currently lacking. These data are relevant for international cooperation.

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to estimate the direct cost of specialized care for an adult neuro-oncological patient with meningioma or glioma during hospitalization in the largest philanthropic hospital in Latin America.

METHODS

The present observational economic analysis describes the direct cost of care of neuro-oncological patients in Santa Casa de São Paulo, Brazil. Only adult patients with a common primary brain tumor were included.

RESULTS

Due to differences in the system records, the period analyzed for cost estimation was between December 2016 and December 2019. A group of patients with meningiomas and gliomas was analyzed. The estimated mean cost of neurosurgical hospitalization was US$4,166. The cost of the operating room and intensive care unit represented the largest proportion of the total cost. A total of 17.5% of patients had some type of infection, and 66.67% of these occurred in nonelective procedures. The mortality rate was 12.7% and 92.3% of all deaths occurred in emergency procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency surgeries were associated with an increased rate of infections and mortality. The findings of the present study could be used by policymakers for resource allocation and to perform economic analyses to establish the value of neurosurgery in achieving global health goals.

The clinicopathological profile and value of multidisciplinary management of pediatric brain tumors in a low-income setting

Brain tumors are the most common solid tumors in children and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality in children worldwide. Data on the epidemiology and management of pediatric brain tumors in Uganda are limited. We aimed to assess the clinicopathological profile and management of pediatric brain tumors at the national oncology center in Uganda since the inception of weekly multidisciplinary meetings. Records of children younger than19 years diagnosed with primary brain tumors at Uganda Cancer Institute between 2017 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient and tumor characteristics were collected with multidisciplinary team management treatment plans for analysis. There were 35 patients evaluated, most of whom were males (57.1%). Craniopharyngioma (n = 9, 25.7%) was the most common brain tumor, followed by astrocytoma (n = 5, 14.2%) and medulloblastoma (n = 4, 11.4%). Management included surgical resection in 28.5% of patients, chemotherapy (28.6%), radiotherapy (17.1%) and palliative care (20.0%). Over the last five years, there were increasing trends in the number of cases discussed in the multidisciplinary team and the number for whom the multidisciplinary management decisions were implemented. The majority (n = 18, 51.4%) of the children with brain tumors were alive and active in care, 34.2% abandoned treatment/lost to follow-up, and 8.6% died. The relative distribution of pediatric brain tumors types in Uganda Cancer Institute differs slightly from international reports, and there has been a notable increase in the number of cases over the years. Implementing multidisciplinary management decisions benefited patients and decreased abandonment and patient loss to follow-up.

Improving Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Survival Disparities in the United States-Mexico Border Region: A Cross-Border Initiative Between San Diego, California, and Tijuana, Mexico

PURPOSE

Treatment of children with CNS tumors (CNSTs) demands a complex, interdisciplinary approach that is rarely available in low- and middle-income countries. We established the Cross-Border Neuro-Oncology Program (CBNP) between Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego (RCHSD), and Hospital General, Tijuana (HGT), Mexico, to provide access to neuro-oncology care, including neurosurgic services, for children with CNSTs diagnosed at HGT. Our purpose was to assess the feasibility of the CBNP across the United States-Mexico border and improve survival for children with CNSTs at HGT by implementing the CBNP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prospectively assessed clinicopathologic profiles, the extent of resection, progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS) in children with CNSTs at HGT from 2010 to 2017.

RESULTS

Sixty patients with CNSTs participated in the CBNP during the study period. The most common diagnoses were low-grade glioma (24.5%) and medulloblastoma (22.4%). Of patients who were eligible for surgery, 49 underwent resection at RCHSD and returned to HGT for collaborative management. Gross total resection was achieved in 78% of cases at RCHSD compared with 0% at HGT (P < .001) and was a predictor of 5-year OS (hazard ratio, 0.250; 95% CI, 0.067 to 0.934; P = .024). Five-year OS improved from 0% before 2010 to 52% in 2017.

CONCLUSION

The CBNP facilitated access to complex neuro-oncology care for underserved children in Mexico through binational exchanges of resources and expertise. Survival for patients in the CBNP dramatically improved. Gross total resection at RCHSD was associated with higher OS, highlighting the critical role of experienced neurosurgeons in the treatment of CNSTs. The CBNP model offers an attractive alternative for children with CNSTs in low- and middle-income countries who require complex neuro-oncology care, particularly those in close proximity to institutions in high-income countries with extensive neuro-oncology expertise.