1
|
Momtaz D, Prabhakar G, Gonuguntla R, Ahmad F, Ghali A, Kotzur T, Nagel S, Chaput C. The 8-item Modified Frailty Index Is an Effective Risk Assessment Tool in Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion. Global Spine J 2024; 14:914-921. [PMID: 36112749 PMCID: PMC11192130 DOI: 10.1177/21925682221127229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. OBJECTIVE Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is one of the most common procedures for cervical diseases often with reliable outcomes. However, morbidity rates can be as high as 19.3% so appropriate patient selection and risk stratification is imperative. Our modified frailty index (MFI) predicts postoperative complications after other orthopaedic procedures. We hypothesized that this index would predict complications in a large cohort of ACDF patients. METHODS We reviewed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, including patients who underwent ACDF from 2015-2020. An 8-item MFI score was calculated for each patient. We recorded 30-days postoperative complications, readmission, and reoperation rates, adjusting for baseline features using standard multivariate regression. This project was approved of by the University of Texas Health Science Center Institutional Review Board and an IRB exception was granted. RESULTS We identified 17 662 ACDF cases. Patients with MFI of 5 or greater had a 37.53 times increased odds of incurring postoperative complications compared to patients with MFI of 0 (P < .001) even when age, sex, race, and ethnicity were controlled for. Specifically, life-threatening Clavien-Dindo IV complications, as well as wound, cardiac, renal, and pulmonary complications were significantly increased in patients with an MFI of 5 or greater. Also, as MFI increased from 1-2 to 3-4 to 5 or greater, the odds of readmission increased from 1.36 to 2.31 to 5.42 times (P < .001) and odds of reoperation from 1.19 (P = .185) to 2.3 to 6.54 times (P < .001). Frailty was still associated with increased complications, readmission, and reoperation after controlling for demographic data, including age, as well as operative time and length of stay. CONCLUSION Frailty is highly predictive of postoperative complications, readmission, and reoperation following ACDF. Employing a simple frailty evaluation can guide surgical decision-making and patient counseling for cervical disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Momtaz
- Orthopaedics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Gautham Prabhakar
- Orthopaedics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Rishi Gonuguntla
- Orthopaedics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Farhan Ahmad
- Orthopaedics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Abdullah Ghali
- Orthopaedics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Travis Kotzur
- Orthopaedics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Sarah Nagel
- Orthopaedics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ma B, Smith A. Outpatient minimally invasive spine surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic - A retrospective analysis of 164 consecutive cases. World Neurosurg X 2023; 20:100229. [PMID: 37456692 PMCID: PMC10344935 DOI: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2023.100229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To share our surgical experiences of minimally invasive cervical and lumbar procedures for patients who suffered from non-fatal motor vehicle accidents (MVAs) in the ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), minimally invasive laminotomy and discectomy (MILD), percutaneous endoscopic laser-assisted discectomy (PELD) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PK) were performed on carefully selected patients. Results From January 2020 to December 2021, our group performed 164 cases on 153 patients involving 249 intervertebral disc (IVD) levels. Of these, 116 cases (70.73%) on 114 patients (74.51%) were cervical, 48 cases (29.27%) were lumbar (including 8 PK cases). Eight patients had both cervical and lumbar procedures in a single anesthetic session (SAS) and were discharged on the same day. One hundred and six ACDF cases (92.17%) were at the C4-C5 and C5-C6 levels, which comprised of 146 (76.04%) IVDs. Of the 40 non-PK lumbar cases, 38 (95.0%) were at L4 to S1 lumbar levels. Six of these cases (15.0%) involved 2 lumbar levels. In contrast, 6 out of 8 kyphoplasties (75.0%) involved lower thoracic/higher lumbar vertebral columns (T11 to L2) and 2 were at the lower lumbar L4 level. Conclusions We successfully and safely performed various cervical and lumbar spine surgeries in the ASCs amid COVID-19 pandemic and all patients achieved the same-day discharge (SDD). In the non-fatal MVAs, mid-lower cervical (C4 to C6) and lower lumbar (L4 to S1) IVDs were the most affected levels.
Collapse
|
3
|
Amakiri UO, Dominy C, Kumar A, Arvind V, Pitaro NL, Kim JS, Cho SK. Previous Emergency Department Admission Is Associated With Increased 90-Day Readmission Following Cervical Spine Surgery: Evidenced Using Propensity Score Matching. Clin Spine Surg 2023; 36:E198-E205. [PMID: 36727862 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective case-control study. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to evaluate whether prior emergency department admission was associated with an increased risk for 90-day readmission following elective cervical spinal fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The incidence of cervical spine fusion reoperations has increased, necessitating the improvement of patient outcomes following surgery. Currently, there are no studies assessing the impact of emergency department visits before surgery on the risk of 90-day readmission following elective cervical spine surgery. This study aimed to fill this gap and identify a novel risk factor for readmission following elective cervical fusion. METHODS The 2016-2018 Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried for patients aged 18 years and older who underwent an elective cervical fusion. Prior emergency admissions were defined using the variable HCUP_ED in the Nationwide Readmissions Database database. Univariate analysis of patient demographic details, comorbidities, discharge disposition, and perioperative complication was evaluated using a χ 2 test followed by multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS In all, 2766 patients fit the inclusion criteria, and 18.62% of patients were readmitted within 90 days. Intraoperative complications, gastrointestinal complications, valvular, uncomplicated hypertension, peripheral vascular disorders, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer, and experiencing less than 3 Charlson comorbidities were identified as independent predictors of 90-day readmission. Patients with greater than 3 Charlson comorbidities (OR=0.04, 95% CI 0.01-0.12, P <0.001) and neurological complications (OR=0.29, 95% CI 0.10-0.86, P =0.026) had decreased odds for 90-day readmission. Importantly, previous emergency department visits within the calendar year before surgery were a new independent predictor of 90-day readmission (OR=9.74, 95% CI 6.86-13.83, P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS A positive association exists between emergency department admission history and 90-day readmission following elective cervical fusion. Screening cervical fusion patients for this history and optimizing outcomes in those patients may reduce 90-day readmission rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uchechukwu O Amakiri
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Incidence and local risk factors of infection after anterior sub-axial cervical spine surgery: retrospective database analysis of 4897 consecutive procedures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143:717-727. [PMID: 34432096 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04133-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The anterior cervical spine approach is safe and effective in many cervical spine pathologies. It is considered one of the most common approaches in spine surgery. Postoperative infections after anterior cervical surgery are rare but serious. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study is a retrospective database analysis. In this study, the incidence, and the local risk factors of postoperative infection after anterior-only sub-axial cervical spine surgery in a high-volume spine center were analyzed. The data of patients operated in a teaching hospital is electronically stored in a comprehensive medical database program. Postoperative infection after anterior cervical surgery from C2 to C7 was calculated and analyzed. In the study period, 4897 patients were operated. Twenty-four infections after a primary aseptic operation were detected. Independent local risk factors were estimated. RESULTS Postoperative infection occurred in 24/4897 patients (0.49%). The incidence of infection after cervical trauma was 3% (7/229), after spinal cord injury 4.3% (2/46), with myelopathy 1.98% (11/556), and after revision surgery 1.25% (7/560). The incidence showed a significant increase (p = 0.00, 0.01, 0.02). In 14 of the postoperatively infected patients (58.3%) an oesophageal injury was diagnosed. Odds ratios (OR) with a confidence interval (CI) of 95% was calculated. Independent risk factors for the postoperative infections were: Cervical trauma (OR 8.59, 95% CI 3.52-20.93), revision surgery (OR 3.22, 95% CI 1.33-7.82), The presence of cervical myelopathy (OR 6.71, 95% CI 2.99-15.06), and spinal cord injury (OR 9.33, 95% CI 2.13-40.83). CONCLUSIONS Postoperative infection after anterior cervical surgery is low (0.49%). In addition to the general risk factor for infection, the local risk factors are trauma, myelopathy, spinal cord injury, and revision surgeries. In the case of postoperative infection, an oesophageal injury should be excluded.
Collapse
|
5
|
Ratnasamy PP, Kammien AJ, Gouzoulis MJ, Oh I, Grauer JN. Emergency Department Visits Within 90 Days of Total Ankle Replacement. FOOT & ANKLE ORTHOPAEDICS 2022; 7:24730114221134255. [PMID: 36324696 PMCID: PMC9619275 DOI: 10.1177/24730114221134255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Total ankle replacement (TAR) utilization in the United States has steeply increased in recent decades. Emergency department (ED) visits following TAR impacts patient satisfaction and health care costs and warrant exploration. Methods This retrospective cohort study utilized the 2010 to 2019 M91Ortho PearlDiver data set to identify TAR patients with at least 90 days of follow-up. PearlDiver contains billing claims data across all sites of care throughout the United States for all indications for care. Patient factors extracted included age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI), region of the country in which surgery was performed, insurance plan, and postoperative hospital length of stay. Ninety-day postoperative ED visit incidence, timing, frequency, and primary diagnoses were identified and compared to 1-year postoperative ED visit baseline data. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine risk factors for ED visits. Results Of 5930 TAR patients identified, ED visits within 90 days were noted for 497 (8.4%) patients. Of all ED visits, 32.0% occurred within 2 weeks following surgery. Multivariate analysis revealed several predictors of ED utilization: younger age (odds ratio [OR] 1.35 per decade decrease), female sex (OR 1.20), higher ECI (OR 1.32 per 2-point increase), TAR performed in the western US (OR 1.34), and Medicaid coverage (OR 2.70; 1.71-4.22 relative to Medicare) (P < .05 each). Surgical site issues comprised 78.0% of ED visits, with surgical site pain (57.0%) as the most common problem. Conclusion Of 5930 TAR patients, 8.4% returned to the ED within 90 days of surgery, with predisposing demographic factors identified. The highest incidence of ED visits was in the first 2 postoperative weeks, and surgical site pain was the most common reason. Pain management pathways following TAR should be able to be adjusted to minimize the occurrence of postoperative ED visits, thereby improving patient experiences and decreasing health care utilization/costs. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective cohort study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip P. Ratnasamy
- Department of Orthopedics & Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Alexander J. Kammien
- Department of Orthopedics & Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Michael J. Gouzoulis
- Department of Orthopedics & Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Irvin Oh
- Department of Orthopedics & Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jonathan N. Grauer
- Department of Orthopedics & Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Jonathan N. Grauer, MD, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, 47 College Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chiang SN, Finnan MJ, Skolnick GB, Sacks JM, Christensen JM. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on alloplastic breast reconstruction: An analysis of national outcomes. J Surg Oncol 2022; 126:195-204. [PMID: 35389527 PMCID: PMC9088498 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background Immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction shifted to the outpatient setting during the COVID‐19 pandemic to conserve inpatient hospital beds while providing timely oncologic care. We examine the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database for trends in and safety of outpatient breast reconstruction during the pandemic. Methods NSQIP data were filtered for immediate alloplastic breast reconstructions between April and December of 2019 (before‐COVID) and 2020 (during‐COVID); the proportion of outpatient procedures was compared. Thirty‐day complications were compared for noninferiority between propensity‐matched outpatients and inpatients utilizing a 1% risk difference margin. Results During COVID, immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction cases decreased (4083 vs. 4677) and were more frequently outpatient (31% vs. 10%, p < 0.001). Outpatients had lower rates of smoking (6.8% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.03) and obesity (26% vs. 33%, p < 0.001). Surgical complication rates of outpatient procedures were noninferior to propensity‐matched inpatients (5.0% vs. 5.5%, p = 0.03 noninferiority). Reoperation rates were lower in propensity‐matched outpatients (5.2% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.003). Conclusion Immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction shifted towards outpatient procedures during the COVID‐19 pandemic with noninferior complication rates. Therefore, a paradigm shift towards outpatient reconstruction for certain patients may be safe. However, decreased reoperations in outpatients may represent undiagnosed complications and warrant further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah N Chiang
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Michael J Finnan
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Gary B Skolnick
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Justin M Sacks
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Joani M Christensen
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cha EDK, Lynch CP, Hrynewycz NM, Geoghegan CE, Mohan S, Jadczak CN, Parrish JM, Jenkins NW, Singh K. Spine Surgery Complications in the Ambulatory Surgical Center Setting: Systematic Review. Clin Spine Surg 2022; 35:118-126. [PMID: 34183543 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN This was a systematic review study. PURPOSE This study aims to review current literature to determine the rates of complications in relation to spine surgery in ambulatory surgery centers (ASC). BACKGROUND Recent improvements in anesthesia, surgical techniques, and technological advances have facilitated a rise in the use of ASC. Despite the benefits and lower costs associated with ASCs, there is inconsistent reporting of complication rates. METHODS This systematic review was completed utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Pertinent studies were identified through Embase and PubMed databases using the search string ((("ambulatory surgery center") AND "spine surgery") AND "complications"). Articles were excluded if they did not report outpatient surgery in an ASC, did not define complications, were in a language other than English, were non-human studies, or if the articles were classified as reviews, book chapters, single case reports, or small case series (≤10 patients). The primary outcome was the frequency of complications with respect to various categories. RESULTS Our query identified 150 articles. After filtering relevance by title, abstract, and full text, 22 articles were included. After accounting for 2 studies that were conducted on the same study sample, a total of 11,245 patients were analyzed in this study. The most recent study reported results from May 2019. While 5 studies did not list their surgical technique, studies reported techniques including open (6), minimally invasive surgery (2), endoscopic (4), microsurgery (1), and combined techniques (4). The following rates of complications were determined: cardiac 0.29% (3/1027), vascular 0.25% (18/7116), pulmonary 0.60% (11/1839), gastrointestinal 1.12% (2/179), musculoskeletal/spine/operative 0.59% (24/4053), urologic 0.80% (2/250), transient neurological 0.67% (31/4616), persistent neurological 0.61% (9/1479), pain related 0.57% (20/3479), and wound site 0.68% (28/4092). CONCLUSIONS After literature review, this is the first study to comprehensively analyze the current state of literature reporting on the complication profile of all ASC spine surgery procedures. The most common complications were gastrointestinal (1.12%) and the most infrequent were vascular (0.25%). Case reports varied significantly with regard to the type and rate of complications reported. This study provides complication profiles to assist surgeons in counseling patients on the most realistic expectations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elliot D K Cha
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Elsamadicy AA, Koo AB, David WB, Zogg CK, Kundishora AJ, Hong CS, Kuzmik GA, Gorrepati R, Coutinho PO, Kolb L, Laurans M, Abbed K. Thirty- and 90-day Readmissions After Spinal Surgery for Spine Metastases: A National Trend Analysis of 4423 Patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2021; 46:828-835. [PMID: 33394977 PMCID: PMC8278805 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000003907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate differences in 30- and 90-day readmissions for spine metastases treated with decompression and/or fusion spine surgery in a nationwide readmission database. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Patients with metastases to the spine represent a particularly vulnerable patient group that may encounter frequent readmissions. However, the 30- and 90-day rates for readmission following surgery for spine metastases have not been well described. METHODS The Nationwide Readmission Database years 2013 to 2015 was queried. Patients were grouped by no readmission (non-R), readmission within 30 days (30-R), and readmission within 31 to 90 days (90-R). Weighted multivariate analysis assessed impact of treatment approach and clinical factors associated with 30- and 90-day readmissions. RESULTS There were a total of 4423 patients with a diagnosis of spine metastases identified who underwent spine surgery, of which 1657 (37.5%) encountered either a 30-or 90-day unplanned readmission (30-R: n = 1068 [24-.1%]; 90-R: n = 589 [13.3%]; non-R: n = 2766). The most prevalent inpatient complications observed were postoperative infection (30-R: 16.3%, 90-R: 14.3%, non-R: 11.5%), acute post-hemorrhagic anemia (30-R: 13.4%, 90-R: 14.2%, non-R: 14.5%), and genitourinary complication (30-R: 5.7%, 90-R: 2.9%, non-R: 6.2%). The most prevalent 30-day and 90-day reasons for admission were sepsis (30-R: 10.2%, 90-R: 10.8%), postoperative infection (30-R: 13.7%, 90-R: 6.5%), and genitourinary complication (30-R: 3.9%, 90-R: 4.1%). On multivariate regression analysis, surgery type, age, hypertension, and renal failure were independently associated with 30-day readmission; rheumatoid arthritis/collagen vascular diseases, and coagulopathy were independently associated with 90-day readmission. CONCLUSION In this study, we demonstrate several patient-level factors independently associated with unplanned hospital readmissions after surgical treatment intervention for spine metastases. Furthermore, we find that the most common reasons for readmission are sepsis, postoperative infection, and genitourinary complications.Level of Evidence: 3.
Collapse
|
9
|
Foley C, Kendall MC, Apruzzese P, De Oliveira GS. American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification as a reliable predictor of postoperative medical complications and mortality following ambulatory surgery: an analysis of 2,089,830 ACS-NSQIP outpatient cases. BMC Surg 2021; 21:253. [PMID: 34020623 PMCID: PMC8140433 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01256-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Seventy percent of surgical procedures are currently performed in the outpatient setting. Although the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Classification ability to predict risk has been evaluated for in-patient surgeries, an evaluation in outpatient surgeries has yet to be performed. The major goal of the current study is to determine if the ASA classification is an independent predictor for morbidity and mortality for outpatient surgeries. METHODS The 2005 through 2016 NSQIP Participant Use Data Files were queried to extract all patients scheduled for outpatient surgery. ASA PS class was the primary independent variable of interest. The primary outcome was 30-day medical complications, defined as having one or more of the following postoperative outcomes: (1) deep vein thrombosis, (2) pulmonary embolism, (3) reintubation, (4) failure to wean from ventilator, (5) renal insufficiency, (6) renal failure, (7) stroke, (8) cardiac arrest, (9) myocardial infarction, (10) pneumonia, (11) urinary tract infection, (12) systemic sepsis or septic shock. Mortality was also evaluated as a separate outcome. RESULTS A total of 2,089,830 cases were included in the study. 24,777 (1.19%) patients had medical complications and 1,701 (0.08%) died within 30 days. ASA PS IV patients had a much greater chance of dying when compared to healthy patients, OR (95%CI) of 89 (55 to 143), P < 0.001. Nonetheless, over 30,000 ASA PS IV patients had surgery in the outpatient setting. Multivariable analysis demonstrated a stepwise independent association between ASA PS class and medical complications (C statistic = 0.70), mortality (C statistic = 0.74) and readmissions (C statistic = 0.67). Risk stratifying ability was maintained across surgical procedures and anesthesia techniques. CONCLUSIONS ASA PS class is a simple risk stratification tool for surgeries in the outpatient setting. Patients with higher ASA PS classes subsequently developed medical complications or mortality at a greater frequency than patients with lower ASA PS class after outpatient surgery. Our results suggest that the ambulatory setting may not be able to match the needs of high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin Foley
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 593 Eddy Street, Davol #129, Providence, RI, 02903, USA
| | - Mark C Kendall
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 593 Eddy Street, Davol #129, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
| | - Patricia Apruzzese
- Department of Anesthesiology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Gildasio S De Oliveira
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 593 Eddy Street, Davol #129, Providence, RI, 02903, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Brown AE, Saleh H, Naessig S, Pierce KE, Ahmad W, Bortz CA, Alas H, Chern I, Vasquez-Montes D, Ihejirika RC, Segreto FA, Haskel J, Kaplan DJ, Diebo BG, Gerling MC, Paulino CB, Theologis A, Lafage V, Janjua MB, Passias PG. Readmission in elective spine surgery: Will short stays be beneficial to patients. J Clin Neurosci 2020; 78:170-174. [PMID: 32360160 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.04.083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2019] [Revised: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
There has been limited discussion as to whether spine surgery patients are benefiting from shorter in-patient hospital stays or if they are incurring higher rates of readmission and complications secondary to shortened length of stays. Included in this study were 237,446 spine patients >18yrs and excluding infection. Patients with Clavien Grade 5 complications in 2015 had the lowest mean time to readmission after initial surgery in all years at 12.44 ± 9.03 days. Pearson bivariate correlations between LOS ≤ 1 day and decreasing days to readmission was the strongest in 2016.). Logistic regression analysis found that LOS ≤ 1 day showed an overall increase in the odds of hospital readmission from 2012 to 2016 (2.29 [2.00-2.63], 2.33 [2.08-2.61], 2.35 [2.11-2.61], 2.27 [2.06-2.49], 2.33 [2.14-2.54], all p < 0.001).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avery E Brown
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hesham Saleh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sara Naessig
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katherine E Pierce
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Waleed Ahmad
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Cole A Bortz
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Haddy Alas
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Irene Chern
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dennis Vasquez-Montes
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rivka C Ihejirika
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Frank A Segreto
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonathan Haskel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel James Kaplan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bassel G Diebo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael C Gerling
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carl B Paulino
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, SUNY Downstate, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Muhammad B Janjua
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter G Passias
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gerling MC, Hale SD, White-Dzuro C, Pierce KE, Naessig SA, Ahmad W, Passias PG. Ambulatory spine surgery. JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY 2019; 5:S147-S153. [PMID: 31656868 DOI: 10.21037/jss.2019.09.19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C Gerling
- Department of Orthopedics, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Steven D Hale
- Department of Orthopedics, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Claire White-Dzuro
- Department of Orthopedics, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katherine E Pierce
- Department of Orthopedics, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sara A Naessig
- Department of Orthopedics, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Waleed Ahmad
- Department of Orthopedics, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter G Passias
- Department of Orthopedics, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|