Matrix² coils in embolization of intracranial aneurysms: 1-year outcome and comparison with bare platinum coil group in a single institution

Hemodynamic Differences Between Recurrent and Nonrecurrent Intracranial Aneurysms: Fluid Dynamics Simulations Based on MR Angiography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Although the role of wall shear stress (WSS) in the initiation, growth, and rupture of intracranial aneurysms has been well studied, its influence on aneurysm recurrence after endovascular treatment requires further investigation. We aimed to compare WSS at necks of recurrent and nonrecurrent aneurysms.

METHODS

Nine recurrent coil-embolized aneurysms were identified and matched with nine nonrecurrent aneurysms. Patient-specific vessel geometries reconstructed from follow-up 3-D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography were analyzed using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. Absolute WSS and the percentage of abnormally low and high WSS at the aneurysm neck compared to the near artery were measured.

RESULTS

The median percentage of abnormal WSS at the aneurysm neck was 49.3% for recurrent and 34.7% for nonrecurrent aneurysms (P = .011). The area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve for distinguishing these aneurysms according to the percentage of abnormal WSS was .86 (95% CI .62 to .98). The optimal cut-off value of 45.1% resulted in a sensitivity and a specificity of 88.89% (95% CI 51.8% to 99.7%).

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that necks of recurrent aneurysms are exposed to abnormal WSS to a larger extent. Abnormal WSS may serve as a metric to distinguish them from nonrecurrent aneurysms with CFD simulations a priori.

Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

PURPOSE

The aim of this updated statement is to provide comprehensive and evidence-based recommendations for management of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS

Writing group members used systematic literature reviews from January 1977 up to June 2014. They also reviewed contemporary published evidence-based guidelines, personal files, and published expert opinion to summarize existing evidence, indicate gaps in current knowledge, and when appropriate, formulated recommendations using standard American Heart Association criteria. The guideline underwent extensive peer review, including review by the Stroke Council Leadership and Stroke Scientific Statement Oversight Committees, before consideration and approval by the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee.

RESULTS

Evidence-based guidelines are presented for the care of patients presenting with unruptured intracranial aneurysms. The guidelines address presentation, natural history, epidemiology, risk factors, screening, diagnosis, imaging and outcomes from surgical and endovascular treatment.

Differences in tissue proliferation and maturation between Matrix2 and bare platinum coil embolization in experimental swine aneurysms

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Recanalization of post-embolization cerebral aneurysms remains a serious problem that influences treatment outcomes. Matrix2 is a bioactive, bio-absorbable, detachable coil that was developed to reduce the risk of recanalization. We examined the short-term efficacy of the Matrix2 coil system, and evaluated the temporal profile of tissue proliferation in a swine experimental aneurysm model compared with the bare platinum (BP) coil.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-six experimental aneurysms were created in 18 swine. All aneurysms were tightly packed with Matrix2 or BP coils. Comparative histologic and morphologic analyses were undertaken 1, 2 and 4 weeks post-embolization.

RESULTS

Endothelial-like cells were observed partially lining the aneurysmal opening one week post-embolization with both coil types. At two and four weeks post-embolization, the aneurysms treated with Matrix2 coils had more extensive areas of organized thrombus than those packed with BP coils, but the numbers of functional proliferating endothelial cells identified by immunohistochemistry in the tissue were broadly comparable between the groups. Moreover, morphological analysis suggested there were more mature endothelial cells in aneurysms treated with bare platinum rather than Matrix2 coils.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that aneurysms embolized with Matrix2 coils build thicker scaffolds for endothelialization, but this is not necessarily evidence of earlier tissue proliferation and maturation than those embolized with BP coils. Matrix2 coils may not be superior to BP coils for preventing aneurysmal recanalization after endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms.

Aneurysm Recurrence Volumetry Is More Sensitive than Visual Evaluation of Aneurysm Recurrences

PURPOSE

Considerable inter-observer variability in the visual assessment of aneurysm recurrences limits its use as an outcome parameter evaluating new coil generations. The purpose of this study was to compare visual assessment of aneurysm recurrences and aneurysm recurrence volumetry with an example dataset of HydroSoft coils (HSC) versus bare platinum coils (BPC).

METHODS

For this retrospective study, 3-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography datasets acquired 6 and 12 months after endovascular therapy using BPC only or mainly HSC were analyzed. Aneurysm recurrence volumes were visually rated by two observersas well as quantified by subtraction of the datasets after intensity-based rigid registration.

RESULTS

A total of 297 aneurysms were analyzed (BPC: 169, HSC: 128). Recurrences were detected by aneurysm recurrence volumetry in 9 of 128 (7.0 %) treated with HSC and in 24 of 169 (14.2 %) treated with BPC (odds ratio: 2.39, 95 % confidence interval: 1.05-5.48; P = 0.039). Aneurysm recurrence volumetry revealed an excellent correlation between observers (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93). In contrast, no significant difference in aneurysm recurrence was found for visual assessment (3.9 % in HSC cases and 4.7 % in BPC cases). Recurrences were observed in aneurysms smaller than the sample median in 10 of 33 (30.3 %) by aneurysm recurrence volumetry and in 1 of 13 (7.7 %) by visual assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Aneurysm recurrences were detected more frequently by aneurysm recurrence volumetry when compared with visual assessment. By using aneurysm recurrence volumetry, differences between treatment groups were detected with higher sensitivity and inter-observer validity probably because of the higher detection rate of recurrences in small aneurysms.