1
|
Berger V, Reeh M, Scherer M, Härterich S, Möller S, Wansing EMA, van der Linde A, Langebrake C. Enhancing drug therapy in ostomy patients: Best practice recommendations for medication management. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0305047. [PMID: 38843261 PMCID: PMC11156294 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ostomy surgery is a common procedure that poses various challenges for patients and healthcare professionals. There are numerous guidelines addressing different ostomy-related problems (ORPs) and supporting an interdisciplinary approach for ostomy care, but evidence-based literature for optimizing drug therapy after ostomy surgery is lacking. AIM To investigate and characterize typical ORPs in relation to drug therapy and provide best practice recommendations from a pharmaceutical point of view. METHODS Patients with an ileo- or colostomy were consecutively enrolled in a prospective, interventional monocentric cohort study during hospitalization, with particular attention to medication. A clinical pharmacist assessed DRPs by performing level 3 medication reviews and patient interviews. Pharmacists' interventions (PIs) were evaluated by two senior clinical pharmacists and documented in DokuPIK (Documentation of Pharmacists' Interventions in the Hospital). Following interdisciplinary discussions, physicians either accepted or rejected the proposed changes in drug therapy. Comparisons were made between ileostomy and colostomy patients regarding type and extent of PIs. RESULTS Out of the 80 patients included in the cohort, 54 (67.5%) had an ileostomy and 26 (32.5%) a colostomy. In this study, 288 PIs were documented (234 ileostomy vs. 54 colostomy), of wich 94.0% were accepted and implemented by the physicians. The most common reason for PIs in both subgroups (29.6% ileostomy vs. 26.1% colostomy) was a missing drug although indicated (e.g. no loperamide, but high stoma output). The proportion of PIs associated with the ostomy was higher in ileostomy patients (48.3% ileostomy vs. 31.5% colostomy; p = 0.025). Typical ORPs were extracted and analyzed as case studies including recommendations for their respective management and prevention. CONCLUSION This study highlights the importance of clinical pharmacists being a part of interdisciplinary teams to collaboratively improve ostomy care and patient safety. Especially ileostomy patients are more vulnerable for ORPs in the context of drug therapy and need to be monitored carefully.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivien Berger
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Reeh
- Department of General, Abdominal, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Katholisches Marienkrankenhaus, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Scherer
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Steffen Härterich
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sven Möller
- Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Annika van der Linde
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Claudia Langebrake
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Michels G, John S, Janssens U, Raake P, Schütt KA, Bauersachs J, Barchfeld T, Schucher B, Delis S, Karpf-Wissel R, Kochanek M, von Bonin S, Erley CM, Kuhlmann SD, Müllges W, Gahn G, Heppner HJ, Wiese CHR, Kluge S, Busch HJ, Bausewein C, Schallenburger M, Pin M, Neukirchen M. [Palliative aspects in clinical acute and emergency medicine as well as intensive care medicine : Consensus paper of the DGIIN, DGK, DGP, DGHO, DGfN, DGNI, DGG, DGAI, DGINA and DG Palliativmedizin]. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 2023; 118:14-38. [PMID: 37285027 PMCID: PMC10244869 DOI: 10.1007/s00063-023-01016-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
The integration of palliative medicine is an important component in the treatment of various advanced diseases. While a German S3 guideline on palliative medicine exists for patients with incurable cancer, a recommendation for non-oncological patients and especially for palliative patients presenting in the emergency department or intensive care unit is missing to date. Based on the present consensus paper, the palliative care aspects of the respective medical disciplines are addressed. The timely integration of palliative care aims to improve quality of life and symptom control in clinical acute and emergency medicine as well as intensive care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Michels
- Zentrum für Notaufnahme, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Trier, Medizincampus der Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Nordallee 1, 54292, Trier, Deutschland.
| | - Stefan John
- Medizinische Klinik 8, Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität und Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Klinikum Nürnberg-Süd, 90471, Nürnberg, Deutschland
| | - Uwe Janssens
- Klinik für Innere Medizin und Internistische Intensivmedizin, St.-Antonius-Hospital gGmbH, Eschweiler, Deutschland
| | - Philip Raake
- I. Medizinischen Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Herzzentrum Augsburg-Schwaben, Augsburg, Deutschland
| | - Katharina Andrea Schütt
- Klinik für Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin (Medizinische Klinik I), Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland
| | - Johann Bauersachs
- Klinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie, Zentrum Innere Medizin, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Thomas Barchfeld
- Medizinische Klinik II, Klinik für Pneumologie, Intensivmedizin und Schlafmedizin, Knappschaftskrankenhaus Dortmund, Klinikum Westfalen, Dortmund, Deutschland
| | - Bernd Schucher
- Abteilung Pneumologie, LungenClinic Großhansdorf, Großhansdorf, Deutschland
| | - Sandra Delis
- Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring GmbH, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Rüdiger Karpf-Wissel
- Westdeutsches Lungenzentrum am Universitätsklinikum Essen gGmbH, Klinik für Pneumologie, Universitätsmedizin Essen Ruhrlandklinik, Essen, Deutschland
| | - Matthias Kochanek
- Medizinische Klinik I, Medizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO) Cologne-Bonn, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Simone von Bonin
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland
| | | | | | - Wolfgang Müllges
- Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - Georg Gahn
- Neurologische Klinik, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe gGmbH, Karlsruhe, Deutschland
| | - Hans Jürgen Heppner
- Klinik für Geriatrie und Geriatrische Tagesklinik, Klinikum Bayreuth - Medizincampus Oberfranken, Bayreuth, Deutschland
| | - Christoph H R Wiese
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, HEH Kliniken Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Deutschland
| | - Stefan Kluge
- Klinik für Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Hans-Jörg Busch
- Universitätsklinikum, Universitäts-Notfallzentrum, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland
| | - Claudia Bausewein
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Palliativmedizin, LMU Klinikum München, München, Deutschland
| | - Manuela Schallenburger
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Palliativmedizin (IZP), Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| | - Martin Pin
- Zentrale Interdisziplinäre Notaufnahme, Florence-Nightingale-Krankenhaus Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| | - Martin Neukirchen
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Palliativmedizin (IZP), Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Atallah L, Nabian M, Brochini L, Amelung PJ. Machine Learning for Benchmarking Critical Care Outcomes. Healthc Inform Res 2023; 29:301-314. [PMID: 37964452 PMCID: PMC10651403 DOI: 10.4258/hir.2023.29.4.301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Enhancing critical care efficacy involves evaluating and improving system functioning. Benchmarking, a retrospective comparison of results against standards, aids risk-adjusted assessment and helps healthcare providers identify areas for improvement based on observed and predicted outcomes. The last two decades have seen the development of several models using machine learning (ML) for clinical outcome prediction. ML is a field of artificial intelligence focused on creating algorithms that enable computers to learn from and make predictions or decisions based on data. This narrative review centers on key discoveries and outcomes to aid clinicians and researchers in selecting the optimal methodology for critical care benchmarking using ML. METHODS We used PubMed to search the literature from 2003 to 2023 regarding predictive models utilizing ML for mortality (592 articles), length of stay (143 articles), or mechanical ventilation (195 articles). We supplemented the PubMed search with Google Scholar, making sure relevant articles were included. Given the narrative style, papers in the cohort were manually curated for a comprehensive reader perspective. RESULTS Our report presents comparative results for benchmarked outcomes and emphasizes advancements in feature types, preprocessing, model selection, and validation. It showcases instances where ML effectively tackled critical care outcome-prediction challenges, including nonlinear relationships, class imbalances, missing data, and documentation variability, leading to enhanced results. CONCLUSIONS Although ML has provided novel tools to improve the benchmarking of critical care outcomes, areas that require further research include class imbalance, fairness, improved calibration, generalizability, and long-term validation of published models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis Atallah
- Clinical Integration and Insights, Philips, Cambridge, MA,
USA
| | - Mohsen Nabian
- Clinical Integration and Insights, Philips, Cambridge, MA,
USA
| | - Ludmila Brochini
- Clinical Integration and Insights, Philips, Eindhoven, The
Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Su L, Ma X, Gao S, Yin Z, Chen Y, Wang W, He H, Du W, Hu Y, Ma D, Zhang F, Zhu W, Meng X, Sun G, Ma L, Jiang H, Shan G, Liu D, Zhou X. Evaluation of ICUs and weight of quality control indicators: an exploratory study based on Chinese ICU quality data from 2015 to 2020. Front Med 2023; 17:675-684. [PMID: 37060524 PMCID: PMC10105137 DOI: 10.1007/s11684-022-0970-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to explore key quality control factors that affected the prognosis of intensive care unit (ICU) patients in Chinese mainland over six years (2015-2020). The data for this study were from 31 provincial and municipal hospitals (3425 hospital ICUs) and included 2 110 685 ICU patients, for a total of 27 607 376 ICU hospitalization days. We found that 15 initially established quality control indicators were good predictors of patient prognosis, including percentage of ICU patients out of all inpatients (%), percentage of ICU bed occupancy of total inpatient bed occupancy (%), percentage of all ICU inpatients with an APACHE II score ⩾15 (%), three-hour (surviving sepsis campaign) SSC bundle compliance (%), six-hour SSC bundle compliance (%), rate of microbe detection before antibiotics (%), percentage of drug deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis (%), percentage of unplanned endotracheal extubations (%), percentage of patients reintubated within 48 hours (%), unplanned transfers to the ICU (%), 48-h ICU readmission rate (%), ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) (per 1000 ventilator days), catheter related blood stream infection (CRBSI) (per 1000 catheter days), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) (per 1000 catheter days), in-hospital mortality (%). When exploratory factor analysis was applied, the 15 indicators were divided into 6 core elements that varied in weight regarding quality evaluation: nosocomial infection management (21.35%), compliance with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines (17.97%), ICU resources (17.46%), airway management (15.53%), prevention of deep-vein thrombosis (14.07%), and severity of patient condition (13.61%). Based on the different weights of the core elements associated with the 15 indicators, we developed an integrated quality scoring system defined as F score=21.35%xnosocomial infection management + 17.97%xcompliance with SSC guidelines + 17.46%×ICU resources + 15.53%×airway management + 14.07%×DVT prevention + 13.61%×severity of patient condition. This evidence-based quality scoring system will help in assessing the key elements of quality management and establish a foundation for further optimization of the quality control indicator system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Longxiang Su
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Xudong Ma
- Department of Medical Administration, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Sifa Gao
- Department of Medical Administration, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Zhi Yin
- Intensive Care Unit, The People's Hospital of Zizhong, Neijiang, 641000, China
| | - Yujie Chen
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Wenhu Wang
- Intensive Care Unit, The People's Hospital of Zizhong, Neijiang, 641000, China
| | - Huaiwu He
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Wei Du
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Yaoda Hu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medicine Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & School of Basic Medicine, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Dandan Ma
- Information Center, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Feng Zhang
- Information Center, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Wen Zhu
- Information Center, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Xiaoyang Meng
- Information Center, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Guoqiang Sun
- Information Center, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Lian Ma
- Information Center, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Huizhen Jiang
- Information Center, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Guangliang Shan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medicine Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & School of Basic Medicine, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
| | - Dawei Liu
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China.
| | - Xiang Zhou
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China.
- Information Center, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kumpf O, Assenheimer M, Bloos F, Brauchle M, Braun JP, Brinkmann A, Czorlich P, Dame C, Dubb R, Gahn G, Greim CA, Gruber B, Habermehl H, Herting E, Kaltwasser A, Krotsetis S, Kruger B, Markewitz A, Marx G, Muhl E, Nydahl P, Pelz S, Sasse M, Schaller SJ, Schäfer A, Schürholz T, Ufelmann M, Waydhas C, Weimann J, Wildenauer R, Wöbker G, Wrigge H, Riessen R. Quality indicators in intensive care medicine for Germany - fourth edition 2022. GERMAN MEDICAL SCIENCE : GMS E-JOURNAL 2023; 21:Doc10. [PMID: 37426886 PMCID: PMC10326525 DOI: 10.3205/000324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
The measurement of quality indicators supports quality improvement initiatives. The German Interdisciplinary Society of Intensive Care Medicine (DIVI) has published quality indicators for intensive care medicine for the fourth time now. After a scheduled evaluation after three years, changes in several indicators were made. Other indicators were not changed or only minimally. The focus remained strongly on relevant treatment processes like management of analgesia and sedation, mechanical ventilation and weaning, and infections in the ICU. Another focus was communication inside the ICU. The number of 10 indicators remained the same. The development method was more structured and transparency was increased by adding new features like evidence levels or author contribution and potential conflicts of interest. These quality indicators should be used in the peer review in intensive care, a method endorsed by the DIVI. Other forms of measurement and evaluation are also reasonable, for example in quality management. This fourth edition of the quality indicators will be updated in the future to reflect the recently published recommendations on the structure of intensive care units by the DIVI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Kumpf
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Frank Bloos
- Jena University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena, Germany
| | - Maria Brauchle
- Landeskrankenhaus Feldkirch, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Feldkirch, Austria
| | - Jan-Peter Braun
- Martin-Luther-Krankenhaus, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexander Brinkmann
- Klinikum Heidenheim, Department of Anesthesia, Surgical Intensive Care Medicine and Special Pain Therapy, Heidenheim, Germany
| | - Patrick Czorlich
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Neurosurgery, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christof Dame
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Neonatology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rolf Dubb
- Kreiskliniken Reutlingen, Academy of the District Hospitals Reutlingen, Germany
| | - Georg Gahn
- Städt. Klinikum Karlsruhe gGmbH, Department of Neurology, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Clemens-A. Greim
- Klinikum Fulda, Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care Medicine, Fulda, Germany
| | - Bernd Gruber
- Niels Stensen Clinics, Marienhospital Osnabrueck, Department Hospital Hygiene, Osnabrueck, Germany
| | - Hilmar Habermehl
- Kreiskliniken Reutlingen, Klinikum am Steinenberg, Center for Intensive Care Medicine, Reutlingen, Germany
| | - Egbert Herting
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Campus Lübeck, Germany
| | - Arnold Kaltwasser
- Kreiskliniken Reutlingen, Academy of the District Hospitals Reutlingen, Germany
| | - Sabine Krotsetis
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Nursing Development and Nursing Science, affiliated with the Nursing Directorate Campus Lübeck, Germany
| | - Bastian Kruger
- Klinikum Heidenheim, Department of Anesthesia, Surgical Intensive Care Medicine and Special Pain Therapy, Heidenheim, Germany
| | | | - Gernot Marx
- University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Department of Intensive Care Medicine and Intermediate Care, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Peter Nydahl
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Nursing Development and Nursing Science, affiliated with the Nursing Directorate Campus Kiel, Germany
| | - Sabrina Pelz
- Universitäts- und Rehabilitationskliniken Ulm, Intensive Care Unit, Ulm, Germany
| | - Michael Sasse
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine, Hanover, Germany
| | - Stefan J. Schaller
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Berlin, Germany
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Tobias Schürholz
- University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Department of Intensive Care Medicine and Intermediate Care, Aachen, Germany
| | - Marina Ufelmann
- Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nursing, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Waydhas
- Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil, Surgical University Hospital and Polyclinic, Bochum, Germany
- Medical Department of the University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Jörg Weimann
- Sankt-Gertrauden Krankenhaus, Department of Anesthesia and Interdisciplinary Intensive Care Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Gabriele Wöbker
- Helios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal, Universität Witten-Herdecke, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Hermann Wrigge
- Bergmannstrost Hospital Halle, Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Pain Therapy, Halle, Germany
- Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Medical Faculty, Halle, Germany
| | - Reimer Riessen
- Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Intensive Care Unit, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
von Schumann S, Ullrich C, Weis A, Wensing M, Litke N. Interprofessional weaning boards for invasively ventilated patients in intensive care units: Qualitative interview study with healthcare professionals in Germany. Res Nurs Health 2023; 46:148-158. [PMID: 36453115 DOI: 10.1002/nur.22279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Numbers of mechanically ventilated patients are increasing worldwide. Weaning Boards could support weaning from the ventilator by facilitating interprofessional consultations between Weaning Centers and nonpneumological intensive care units. This study, which is linked to the project Prevention of invasive Ventilation, aimed to explore the design and implementation of future Weaning Boards. Semistructured interviews were conducted with physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, and physiotherapists of intensive care units and Weaning Centers in Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany. Participants were asked to share their views on (a) required characteristics of Weaning Boards and (b) the current care of weaning patients in their wards. Qualitative data analysis included inductive and deductive steps referring to the Template for Intervention Description and Replication checklist and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. The 14 interviewed healthcare professionals addressed characteristics of future Weaning Boards including (a) preconditions, (b) procedure, (c) interprofessional participants, (d) type of performance, and (d) time frame. Identified determinants for successful implementation were related to (a) individual characteristics of healthcare professionals, (b) ward characteristics, and (c) healthcare system characteristics. Weaning Boards could be a useful tool to advance knowledge sharing between professionals, improve education about weaning protocols, and support patient-oriented care. The implementation of Weaning Boards can be influenced by individual characteristics of participating professionals, difficulties in the interaction between professional groups, the present workplace culture, and the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selina von Schumann
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Charlotte Ullrich
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Aline Weis
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michel Wensing
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nicola Litke
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Waydhas C, Deffner T, Gaschler R, Häske D, Hamsen U, Herbstreit F, Hierundar A, Kumpf O, Rohe G, Spiekermann A, Vonderhagen S, Waeschle RM, Riessen R. Sedation, sleep-promotion, and non-verbal and verbal communication techniques in critically ill intubated or tracheostomized patients: results of a survey. BMC Anesthesiol 2022; 22:384. [PMID: 36503427 PMCID: PMC9743767 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-022-01887-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this survey was to describe, on a patient basis, the current practice of sedation, pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic measures to promote sleep and facilitation of communication in critically ill patients oro-tracheally intubated or tracheostomized. METHODS Cross-sectional online-survey evaluating sedation, sleep management and communication in oro-tracheally intubated (IP) or tracheostomized (TP) patients in intensive care units on a single point. RESULTS Eighty-one intensive care units including 447 patients (IP: n = 320, TP: n = 127) participated. A score of ≤ -2 on the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) was prevalent in 58.2% (IP 70.7% vs. TP 26.8%). RASS -1/0 was present in 32.2% (IP 25.9% vs. TP 55.1%) of subjects. Propofol and alpha-2-agonist were the predominant sedatives used while benzodiazepines were applied in only 12.1% of patients. For sleep management, ear plugs and sleeping masks were rarely used (< 7%). In half of the participating intensive care units a technique for phonation was used in the tracheostomized patients. CONCLUSIONS The overall rate of moderate and deep sedation appears high, particularly in oro-tracheally intubated patients. There is no uniform sleep management and ear plugs and sleeping masks are only rarely applied. The application of phonation techniques in tracheostomized patients during assisted breathing is low. More efforts should be directed towards improved guideline implementation. The enhancement of sleep promotion and communication techniques in non-verbal critically ill patients may be a focus of future guideline development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Waydhas
- grid.5570.70000 0004 0490 981XRuhr-Universität-Bochum, Universitätsstrasse 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany ,grid.412471.50000 0004 0551 2937Klinik Und Poliklinik Für Chirurgie, Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil Bochum, Bürkle-de-La-Camp-Platz 1, 44789 Bochum, Germany ,Present Address: Klinik Für Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum, Universitätsmedizin Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Teresa Deffner
- grid.275559.90000 0000 8517 6224Klinik Für Anästhesiologie Und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Bachstrasse 18, 07743 Jena, Germany
| | - Robert Gaschler
- Fakultät Für Psychologie, Lehrgebiet Allgemeine Psychologie: Lernen, Motivation, Emotion, FernUniversität in Hagen, Universitätsstrasse 33, 58084 Hagen, Germany
| | - David Häske
- grid.411544.10000 0001 0196 8249Center for Public Health and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tübingen, Osianderstraße 5, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Uwe Hamsen
- grid.5570.70000 0004 0490 981XRuhr-Universität-Bochum, Universitätsstrasse 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany ,grid.412471.50000 0004 0551 2937Klinik Und Poliklinik Für Chirurgie, Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil Bochum, Bürkle-de-La-Camp-Platz 1, 44789 Bochum, Germany
| | - Frank Herbstreit
- Klinik Für Anästhesiologie Und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum, Universitätsmedizin Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Anke Hierundar
- grid.413108.f0000 0000 9737 0454Klinik Für Anästhesiologie Und Intensivtherapie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Schillingallee 35, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Oliver Kumpf
- grid.7468.d0000 0001 2248 7639Klinik Für Anästhesiologie Mit Schwerpunkt Operative Intensivmedizin, Campus Charité Mitte Und Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Georg Rohe
- grid.5560.60000 0001 1009 3608University Clinic for Anaesthesiology / Intensive Care Medicine / Emergency Medicine / Pain Medicine, Klinikum Oldenburg, Medical Campus of the University Oldenburg), Rahel Straus - Str. 10, 26133 Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Aileen Spiekermann
- grid.5570.70000 0004 0490 981XRuhr-Universität-Bochum, Universitätsstrasse 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany ,grid.412471.50000 0004 0551 2937Klinik Und Poliklinik Für Chirurgie, Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil Bochum, Bürkle-de-La-Camp-Platz 1, 44789 Bochum, Germany
| | - Sonja Vonderhagen
- Present Address: Klinik Für Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum, Universitätsmedizin Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Reiner M. Waeschle
- grid.411984.10000 0001 0482 5331Klinik Für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Reimer Riessen
- grid.411544.10000 0001 0196 8249Department Für Innere Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Berger V, Sommer C, Boje P, Hollmann J, Hummelt J, König C, Lezius S, van der Linde A, Marhenke C, Melzer S, Michalowski N, Baehr M, Langebrake C. The impact of pharmacists' interventions within the Closed Loop Medication Management process on medication safety: An analysis in a German university hospital. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:1030406. [PMID: 36452222 PMCID: PMC9704051 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1030406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Single elements of the Closed Loop Medication Management process (CLMM), including electronic prescribing, involvement of clinical pharmacists (CPs), patient individual logistics and digital administration/documentation, have shown to improve medication safety and patient health outcomes. The impact of the complete CLMM on patient safety, as reflected in pharmacists' interventions (PIs), is largely unknown. Aim: To evaluate the extent and characterization of routine PIs performed by hospital-wide CPs at a university hospital with an implemented CLMM. Methods: This single-center study included all interventions documented by CPs on five self-chosen working days within 1 month using the validated online-database DokuPIK (Documentation of Pharmacists' Interventions in the Hospital). Based on different workflows, two groups of CPs were compared. One group operated as a part of the CLMM, the "Closed Loop Clinical Pharmacists" (CL-CPs), while the other group worked less dependent of the CLMM, the "Process Detached Clinical Pharmacists" (PD-CPs). The professional experience and the number of medication reviews were entered in an online survey. Combined pseudonymized datasets were analyzed descriptively after anonymization. Results: A total of 1,329 PIs were documented by nine CPs. Overall CPs intervened in every fifth medication review. The acceptance rate of PIs was 91.9%. The most common reasons were the categories "drugs" (e.g., indication, choice of formulation/drug and documentation/transcription) with 42.7%, followed by "dose" with 29.6%. One-quarter of PIs referred to the therapeutic subgroup "J01 antibacterials for systemic use." Of the 1,329 underlying PIs, 1,295 were classified as medication errors (MEs) and their vast majority (81.5%) was rated as "error, no harm" (NCC MERP categories B-D). Among PIs performed by CL-CPs (n = 1,125), the highest proportion of errors was categorized as B (56.5%), while in the group of PIs from PD-CPs (n = 170) errors categorized as C (68.2%) dominated (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our study shows that a structured CLMM enables CPs to perform a high number of medication reviews while detecting and solving MEs at an early stage before they can cause harm to the patient. Based on key quality indicators for medication safety, the complete CLMM provides a suitable framework for the efficient medication management of inpatients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivien Berger
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Sommer
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Peggy Boje
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Josef Hollmann
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Julia Hummelt
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christina König
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Susanne Lezius
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Annika van der Linde
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Corinna Marhenke
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Simone Melzer
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nina Michalowski
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michael Baehr
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Claudia Langebrake
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
COVID-19 Intensive Care—Evaluation of Public Information Sources and Current Standards of Care in German Intensive Care Units: A Cross Sectional Online Survey on Intensive Care Staff in Germany. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10071315. [PMID: 35885841 PMCID: PMC9319015 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10071315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Backround: In February 2021, the first formal evidence and consensus-based (S3) guidelines for the inpatient treatment of patients with COVID-19 were published in Germany and have been updated twice during 2021. The aim of the present study is to re-evaluate the dissemination pathways and strategies for ICU staff (first evaluation in December 2020 when previous versions of consensus-based guidelines (S2k) were published) and question selected aspects of guideline adherence of standard care for patients with COVID-19 in the ICU. Methods: We conducted an anonymous online survey among German intensive care staff from 11 October 2021 to 11 November 2021. We distributed the survey via e-mail in intensive care facilities and requested redirection to additional intensive care staff (snowball sampling). Results: There was a difference between the professional groups in the number, selection and qualitative assessment of information sources about COVID-19. Standard operating procedures were most frequently used by all occupational groups and received a high quality rating. Physicians preferred sources for active information search (e.g., medical journals), while nurses predominantly used passive consumable sources (e.g., every-day media). Despite differences in usage behaviour, the sources were rated similarly in terms of the quality of the information on COVID-19. The trusted organizations have not changed over time. The use of guidelines was frequently stated and highly recommended. The majority of the participants reported guideline-compliant treatment. Nevertheless, there were certain variations in the use of medication as well as the criteria chosen for discontinuing non-invasive ventilation (NIV) compared to guideline recommendations. Conclusions: An adequate external source of information for nursing staff is lacking, the usual sources of physicians are only appropriate for the minority of nursing staff. The self-reported use of guidelines is high.
Collapse
|
10
|
Mao JY, Zhang HM, Liu DW, Wang XT. Visual Rounds Based on Multiorgan Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the ICU. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:869958. [PMID: 35692540 PMCID: PMC9174546 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.869958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) is performed by a treating clinician at the patient's bedside, provides a acquisition, interpretation, and immediate clinical integration based on ultrasonographic imaging. The use of POCUS is not limited to one specialty, protocol, or organ system. POCUS provides the treating clinician with real-time diagnostic and monitoring information. Visual rounds based on multiorgan POCUS act as an initiative to improve clinical practice in the Intensive Care Unit and are urgently needed as part of routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-Yu Mao
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China
| | - Hong-Min Zhang
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China
| | - Da-Wei Liu
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao-Ting Wang
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China
- Department of Health Care, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Xiao-Ting Wang
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schlömmer C, Schittek GA, Meier J, Hasibeder W, Valentin A, Dünser MW. The Austrian ICU survey : A questionnaire-based evaluation of intensive care medicine in Austria. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2022; 134:351-360. [PMID: 35084589 PMCID: PMC8792524 DOI: 10.1007/s00508-021-02002-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Background While structures of intensive care medicine in Austria are well defined, data on organisational and medical practice in intensive care units (ICUs) have not been systematically evaluated. Methods In this explorative survey, organisational and medical details of ICUs in Austria were collected using an online questionnaire consisting of 147 questions. Results Out of 249 registered ICUs 73 (29.3%) responded, 60 were adult, 10 pediatric/neonatal ICUs and 19, 25 and 16 ICUs were located in level I, II and III hospitals, respectively. Of the respondents 89% reported that the ICU director was board-certified in intensive care medicine. Consultants were constantly present in 78% of ICUs during routine working hours and in 45% during nights and weekends. The nurse:bed ratio varied between 1:1 and 1:2 in 74% during day shifts and 60% during night shifts. Routine physiotherapist rounds were reported to take place daily except weekends in 67% of ICUs. Common monitoring techniques were reported to be in routine or occasional use in 85% and 83% of ICUs, respectively. The majority of ICUs provided daily visiting hours ranging between 2–12 h. Waiting rooms for relatives were available in 66% and an electronic documentation system in 66% of ICUs. Written protocols were available in 70% of ICUs. Conclusion The Austrian ICU survey suggests that ICUs in Austria are clearly structured, well-organized and well-equipped and have a high nurse:bed ratio. In view of the relatively low return rate we cannot exclude that a selection bias has led to overestimation of the survey findings. Supplementary Information The online version of this article (10.1007/s00508-021-02002-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Schlömmer
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gregor A Schittek
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Jens Meier
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kepler University Hospital and Johannes Kepler University Linz, Krankenhausstraße 9, 4020, Linz, Austria
| | - Walter Hasibeder
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Zams, Zams, Austria
| | - Andreas Valentin
- Department of Internal and Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Schwarzach, Schwarzach, Austria
| | - Martin W Dünser
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kepler University Hospital and Johannes Kepler University Linz, Krankenhausstraße 9, 4020, Linz, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Structure and concept of ICU rounds: the VIS-ITS survey. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 2021; 117:276-282. [PMID: 34125258 PMCID: PMC9061682 DOI: 10.1007/s00063-021-00830-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Objective To gather data about structural and procedural characteristics of patient rounds in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. Design A structured online survey was offered to members of two German intensive care medicine societies. Measurements and main results Intensivists representing 390 German ICUs participated in this study (university hospitals 25%, tertiary hospitals 23%, secondary hospitals 36%, primary hospitals 16%). In 90% of participating ICUs, rounds were reported to take place in the morning and cover an average of 12 intensive care beds and 6 intermediate care beds within 60 min. With an estimated bed occupancy of 80%, this averaged to 4.3 min spent per patient during rounds. In 96% of ICUs, rounds were stated to include a bedside visit. On weekdays, 86% of the respondents reported holding a second ICU round with the attendance of a qualified decision-maker (e.g. board-certified intensivist). On weekends, 79% of the ICUs performed at least one round with a decision-maker per day. In 18%, only one ICU round per weekend was reported, mostly on Sundays. The highest-qualified decision-maker present during rounds on most ICUs was an ICU attending (57%). Residents (96%) and intensive care nurses (87%) were stated to be always or usually present during rounds. In contrast, physiotherapists, respiratory therapists or medical specialists such as pharmacists or microbiologist were not regular members of the rounding team on most ICUs. In the majority of cases, the participants reported examining the medical chart directly before or during the bedside visit (84%). An electronic patient data management system (PDMS) was available on 31% of ICUs. Daily goals were always (55%) or usually (39%) set during rounds. Conclusion This survey gives a broad overview of the structure and processes of ICU rounds in different sized hospitals in Germany. Compared to other mostly Anglo-American studies, German ICU rounds appear to be shorter and less interdisciplinary.
Collapse
|
13
|
Kaltwasser A, Pelz S, Nydahl P, Dubb R, Borzikowsky C. [Cross-sectional study of COVID-19 patients on working conditions and quality of care]. Anaesthesist 2021; 70:753-760. [PMID: 33564892 PMCID: PMC7872114 DOI: 10.1007/s00101-021-00919-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Revised: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Hintergrund Die COVID-19-Pandemie stellt Mitarbeiter im Kontext der klinischen Versorgung stationärer Patienten vor zusätzliche Belastungen. Zentrale Fragen sind, ob Gesundheitspersonal in der Versorgung von COVID-19-Patienten mehr Belastungen erlebt und die Patientensicherheit und Versorgungsqualität sich verändert haben. Methodik Querschnittsstudie mittels einer Online-Umfrage von Ärzten, Pflegenden, Therapeuten in Krankenhäusern zu Arbeitsbedingungen und Versorgungsqualität während der COVID-19-Pandemie sowie Vergleich von Mitarbeitern mit (MmK) vs. ohne direkten Kontakt (MoK) mit infizierten COVID-19-Patienten. Ergebnisse Insgesamt nahmen 2122 Personen an der Online-Umfrage teil. Die meisten Teilnehmer arbeiteten in Maximalversorgern (46,0 %, n = 899), waren Ärzte (15,4 %, n = 301) und Pflegende (77,0 %, n = 1505). Jeder zweite Befragte gab an, mehr als sonst gearbeitet (46,4 %, n = 907) und zusätzliche Tätigkeiten übernommen (47,7 %, n = 932) zu haben, ein Viertel ohne Einarbeitung bzw. Geräteeinweisung (21,5 %, n = 421). Lediglich 51,5 % (n = 1006) der Befragten wurde ausreichend Schutzkleidung gestellt. Ein Drittel (32,7 %, n = 639) war mehr als sonst zufrieden. Mitarbeiter mit vs. ohne direkten Kontakt mit infizierten Covid-19 Patienten gaben mehr Belastungen an, es wurde mehr (> 2 Schichten: 24,1 %, n = 306 vs. 13,7 %, n = 63, p < 0,001) und ohne Einweisung (27,9 %, n = 364 vs. 17,1 %, n = 57, p < 0,001) gearbeitet; in der Patientensicherheit gab es mehr Mängel in der Betreuung, Beatmung und Pflege (alle p < 0,001). Schlussfolgerungen Die Querschnittsstudie weist auf eine erhöhte Belastung der Mitarbeiter hin, sowie auf eine eingeschränkte Versorgungsqualität von mit COVID-19 infizierten Patienten. Eine Patienten- bzw. Mitarbeitergefährdung kann nicht ausgeschlossen werden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnold Kaltwasser
- Akademie der Kreiskliniken Reutlingen GmbH, Reutlingen, Deutschland.
| | | | - Peter Nydahl
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Deutschland
| | - Rolf Dubb
- Akademie der Kreiskliniken Reutlingen GmbH, Reutlingen, Deutschland
| | - Christoph Borzikowsky
- Institut für Medizinische Informatik und Statistik, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Paul N, Grunow JJ, Weiß B, Spies C. [Enhanced Recovery after Intensive Care-ERIC]. Anaesthesist 2020; 69:937-939. [PMID: 33026507 PMCID: PMC7716892 DOI: 10.1007/s00101-020-00863-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- N Paul
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie mit Schwerpunkt operative Intensivmedizin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - J J Grunow
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie mit Schwerpunkt operative Intensivmedizin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - B Weiß
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie mit Schwerpunkt operative Intensivmedizin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - C Spies
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie mit Schwerpunkt operative Intensivmedizin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kumpf O, Nothacker M, Braun J, Muhl E. The future development of intensive care quality indicators - a methods paper. GERMAN MEDICAL SCIENCE : GMS E-JOURNAL 2020; 18:Doc09. [PMID: 33214791 PMCID: PMC7656810 DOI: 10.3205/000285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Revised: 04/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Medical quality indicators (QI) are important tools in the evaluation of medical quality. Their development is subject to specific methodological requirements, which include practical applicability. This is especially true for intensive care medicine with its complex processes and their interactions. This methods paper presents the status quo and shows necessary methodological developments for intensive care QI. For this purpose, a cooperation with the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies' Institute for Medical Knowledge Management (AWMF-IMWi) was established. Methodology: Review of published German manuals for QI development from guidelines and narrative review of quality indicators with a focus on evidence and consensus-based guideline recommendations. Future methodological adaptations of indicator development for improved operationalization, measurability and pilot testing are presented, and a development process is proposed. Results: The development of intensive care quality indicators in Germany is based on an established process. In the future, additional evaluation criteria (QUALIFY criteria) will be applied to assess the evidence base. In addition, a continuous exchange between the national steering committee of the DIVI responsible for QI development and guideline development groups involved in intensive care medicine is planned. Conclusion: Intensive care quality indicators will have to meet improved methodological requirements in the future by means of an improved development process. Future QI development is intended to improve the structure of the development process, with a focus on scientific evidence and a link to guideline projects. This is intended to achieve the goal of a broad application of QI and to further evaluate its relevance for patient outcome and performance of institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Kumpf
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.,National Steering Committee Peer Review, German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (DIVI), Berlin, Germany
| | - Monika Nothacker
- AWMF-Institute for Medical Knowledge Management c/o Philipps-Universität, Marburg, Germany
| | - Jan Braun
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Martin-Luther-Krankenhaus, Berlin, Germany.,National Steering Committee Peer Review, German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (DIVI), Berlin, Germany
| | - Elke Muhl
- Groß Grönau, Germany.,National Steering Committee Peer Review, German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (DIVI), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Blecha S, Weber-Carstens S, Bein T. [Health services research in intensive care medicine in Germany : Status quo and future challenges exemplified by acute pulmonary failure]. Anaesthesist 2020; 68:343-352. [PMID: 31101923 DOI: 10.1007/s00101-019-0602-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Health services research (HSR) is a multidisciplinary field of research that describes disease treatment and health care and their framework conditions. In the last 20 years, the HSR aspect became more and more the clinical focus of intensive care medicine. Under this aspect HSR investigates the use of clinical measures and their impact on patient outcome under routine intensive care medical conditions. This article provides an overview of the current state of HSR in intensive care medicine in Germany using the example of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The ARDS still represents a clinical disease with high intra-hospital mortality (30-60%) despite progress in intensive care medicine. Survivors of ARDS have substantial long-term limitations on physical and mental health. The treatment of ARDS patients is tedious, laborious for intensive care unit staff and complex. Despite evident treatment recommendations, these are only insufficiently implemented in the clinical routine. With the help of quality indicators, benchmarking, certification and peer review procedures, the quality of intensive care treatment in the clinical routine can be documented and improved. An important role in HSR is patient safety and focusing on the outcome with evaluation of the patient's will. As part of the establishment of the innovation fund for HSR, promising intensive medical care projects have been promoted to improve the quality of care and the quality of long-term outcome for intensive care patients. An important focus lies on the identification of factors that improve long-term quality of life after intensive care. The expansion of registries and telemedicine in intensive care offers the opportunity to bundle and share experiences more effectively and thereby establish (guideline-based) treatment recommendations faster in the clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Blecha
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland.
| | - S Weber-Carstens
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie mit Schwerpunkt operative Intensivmedizin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum und Campus Mitte, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - T Bein
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Adrion C, Weiss B, Paul N, Berger E, Busse R, Marschall U, Caumanns J, Rosseau S, Mansmann U, Spies C. Enhanced Recovery after Intensive Care (ERIC): study protocol for a German stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a critical care telehealth program on process quality and functional outcomes. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e036096. [PMID: 32978185 PMCID: PMC7520839 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Survival after critical illness has noticeably improved over the last decades due to advances in critical care medicine. Besides, there is an increasing number of elderly patients with chronic diseases being treated in the intensive care unit (ICU). More than half of the survivors of critical illness suffer from medium-term or long-term cognitive, psychological and/or physical impairments after ICU discharge, which is recognised as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). There are evidence-based and consensus-based quality indicators (QIs) in intensive care medicine, which have a positive influence on patients' long-term outcomes if adhered to. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The protocol of a multicentre, pragmatic, stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled, quality improvement trial is presented. During 3 predefined steps, 12 academic hospitals in Berlin and Brandenburg, Germany, are randomly selected to move in a one-way crossover from the control to the intervention condition. After a multifactorial training programme on QIs and clinical outcomes for site personnel, ICUs will receive an adapted, interprofessional protocol for a complex telehealth intervention comprising of daily telemedical rounds at ICU. The targeted sample size is 1431 patients. The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention on the adherence to eight QIs daily measured during the patient's ICU stay, compared with standard of care. Furthermore, the impact on long-term recovery such as PICS-related, patient-centred outcomes including health-related quality of life, mental health, clinical assessments of cognition and physical function, all-cause mortality and cost-effectiveness 3 and 6 months after ICU discharge will be evaluated. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany (EA1/006/18). The results will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and presented at international conferences. Study findings will also be disseminated via the website (www.eric-projekt.net). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT03671447).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Adrion
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Bjoern Weiss
- Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nicolas Paul
- Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Elke Berger
- Department of Health Care Management, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Reinhard Busse
- Department of Health Care Management, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Jörg Caumanns
- Fraunhofer Institute for Open Communication Systems, Berlin, Germany
| | - Simone Rosseau
- Weaning and Ventilation Centre, Ernst von Bergmann Klinikum, Bad Belzig, Germany
| | - Ulrich Mansmann
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Claudia Spies
- Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Deffland M, Spies C, Weiss B, Keller N, Jenny M, Kruppa J, Balzer F. Effects of pain, sedation and delirium monitoring on clinical and economic outcome: A retrospective study. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0234801. [PMID: 32877411 PMCID: PMC7467321 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Significant improvements in clinical outcome can be achieved by implementing effective strategies to optimise pain management, reduce sedative exposure, and prevent and treat delirium in ICU patients. One important strategy is the monitoring of pain, agitation and delirium (PAD bundle). We hypothesised that there is no sufficient financial benefit to implement a monitoring strategy in a Diagnosis Related Group (DRG)-based reimbursement system, therefore we expected better clinical and decreased economic outcome for monitored patients. METHODS This is a retrospective observational study using routinely collected data. We used univariate and multiple linear analysis, machine-learning analysis and a novel correlation statistic (maximal information coefficient) to explore the association between monitoring adherence and resulting clinical and economic outcome. For univariate analysis we split patients in an adherence achieved and an adherence non-achieved group. RESULTS In total 1,323 adult patients from two campuses of a German tertiary medical centre, who spent at least one day in the ICU between admission and discharge between 1. January 2016 and 31. December 2016. Adherence to PAD monitoring was associated with shorter hospital LoS (e.g. pain monitoring 13 vs. 10 days; p<0.001), ICU LoS, duration of mechanical ventilation shown by univariate analysis. Despite the improved clinical outcome, adherence to PAD elements was associated with a decreased case mix per day and profit per day shown by univariate analysis. Multiple linear analysis did not confirm these results. PAD monitoring is important for clinical as well as economic outcome and predicted case mix better than severity of illness shown by machine learning analysis. CONCLUSION Adherence to PAD bundles is also important for clinical as well as economic outcome. It is associated with improved clinical and worse economic outcome in comparison to non-adherence in univariate analysis but not confirmed by multiple linear analysis. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov NCT02265263, Registered 15 October 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Deffland
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Claudia Spies
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Bjoern Weiss
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Niklas Keller
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mirjam Jenny
- Science Communication Unit, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany
- Harding Center for Risk Literacy, Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
- Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jochen Kruppa
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Balzer
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ziemann S, Coburn M, Rossaint R, Van Waesberghe J, Bürkle H, Fries M, Henrich M, Henzler D, Iber T, Karst J, Kunitz O, Löb R, Meißner W, Meybohm P, Mierke B, Pabst F, Schaelte G, Schiff J, Soehle M, Winterhalter M, Kowark A. Implementation of anesthesia quality indicators in Germany : A prospective, national, multicenter quality improvement study. Anaesthesist 2020; 70:38-47. [PMID: 32377798 PMCID: PMC8674175 DOI: 10.1007/s00101-020-00773-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Revised: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2016 the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) and the Association of German Anesthetists (BDA) published 10 quality indicators (QI) to compare and improve the quality of anesthesia care in Germany. So far, there is no evidence for the feasibility of implementation of these QI in hospitals. OBJECTIVE This study tested the hypothesis that the implementation of the 10 QI is feasible in German hospitals. MATERIAL AND METHODS This prospective three-phase national multicenter quality improvement study was conducted in 15 German hospitals and 1 outpatient anesthesia center from March 2017 to February 2018. The trial consisted of an initial evaluation of pre-existing structures and processes by the heads of the participating anesthesia departments, followed by a 6-month implementation phase of the QI as well as a final re-evaluation phase. The implementation procedure was supported by web-based implementation aids ( www.qi-an.org ) and internal quality management programs. The primary endpoint was the difference in the number of implemented QI per center before and after implementation. Secondary endpoints were the number of newly implemented QI per center, the overall number of successful implementations of each QI, the identification of problems during the implementation as well as the kind of impediments preventing the QI implementation. RESULTS The average number of implemented QI increased from 5.8 to 6.8 (mean of the differences 1.1 ± 1.3; P < 0.01). Most frequently the QI perioperative morbidity and mortality report (5 centers) and the QI temperature management (4 centers) could be implemented. After the implementation phase, the QI incidence management and patient blood management were implemented in all 16 centers. Implementation of other quality indicators failed mainly due to a lack of time and lack of structural resources. CONCLUSION In this study the implementation of QI was proven to be mostly feasible in the participating German hospitals. Although several QI could be implemented with minor effort, more time, financial and structural resources would be required for some QI, such as the QI postoperative visit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Ziemann
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - M Coburn
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
| | - R Rossaint
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - J Van Waesberghe
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - H Bürkle
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - M Fries
- Department of Anaesthesiology, St. Vincenz Hospital Limburg, Limburg, Germany
| | - M Henrich
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, St.-Vincentius Hospital Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - D Henzler
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Surgical Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, Klinikum Herford, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herford, Germany
| | - T Iber
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Klinikum Mittelbaden, Baden-Baden, Germany
| | - J Karst
- Outpatient Anaesthesia Care Centre Karst, Berlin, Germany
| | - O Kunitz
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen, Trier, Germany
| | - R Löb
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, St. Barbara Hospital, Hamm, Germany
| | - W Meißner
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - P Meybohm
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - B Mierke
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hospital St. Elisabeth, Damme, Germany
| | - F Pabst
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - G Schaelte
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - J Schiff
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care Medicine, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - M Soehle
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - M Winterhalter
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Klinikum Bremen-Mitte, Bremen, Germany
| | - A Kowark
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ziemann S, Coburn M, Rossaint R, Van Waesberghe J, Bürkle H, Fries M, Henrich M, Henzler D, Iber T, Karst J, Kunitz O, Löb R, Meißner W, Meybohm P, Mierke B, Pabst F, Schaelte G, Schiff J, Soehle M, Winterhalter M, Kowark A. [Implementation of anesthesia quality indicators in Germany : A prospective, national, multicenter quality improvement study]. Anaesthesist 2020; 69:544-554. [PMID: 32617630 DOI: 10.1007/s00101-020-00775-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2016 the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) and the Association of German Anesthetists (BDA) published 10 quality indicators (QI) to compare and improve the quality of anesthesia care in Germany. So far, there is no evidence for the feasibility of implementation of these QI in hospitals. OBJECTIVE This study tested the hypothesis that the implementation of the 10 QI is feasible in German hospitals. MATERIAL AND METHODS This prospective three-phase national multicenter quality improvement study was conducted in 15 German hospitals and 1 outpatient anesthesia center from March 2017 to February 2018. The trial consisted of an initial evaluation of pre-existing structures and processes by the heads of the participating anesthesia departments, followed by a 6-month implementation phase of the QI as well as a final re-evaluation phase. The implementation procedure was supported by web-based implementation aids ( www.qi-an.org ) and internal quality management programs. The primary endpoint was the difference in the number of implemented QI per center before and after implementation. Secondary endpoints were the number of newly implemented QI per center, the overall number of successful implementations of each QI, the identification of problems during the implementation as well as the kind of impediments preventing the QI implementation. RESULTS The average number of implemented QI increased from 5.8 to 6.8 (mean of the differences 1.1 ± 1.3; P < 0.01). Most frequently the QI perioperative morbidity and mortality report (5 centers) and the QI temperature management (4 centers) could be implemented. After the implementation phase, the QI incidence management and patient blood management were implemented in all 16 centers. Implementation of other quality indicators failed mainly due to a lack of time and lack of structural resources. CONCLUSION In this study the implementation of QI was proven to be mostly feasible in the participating German hospitals. Although several QI could be implemented with minor effort, more time, financial and structural resources would be required for some QI, such as the QI postoperative visit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Ziemann
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland
| | - M Coburn
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland.
| | - R Rossaint
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland
| | - J Van Waesberghe
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland
| | - H Bürkle
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Fakultät für Medizin, Universitätsklinikum, Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland
| | - M Fries
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus Limburg, Limburg, Deutschland
| | - M Henrich
- Klinik für Anästhesie, Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin, St.-Vincentius-Kliniken Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Deutschland
| | - D Henzler
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, operative Intensiv‑, Rettungsmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Klinikum Herford, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Herford, Deutschland
| | - T Iber
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Klinikum Mittelbaden, Baden-Baden, Deutschland
| | - J Karst
- Ambulantes Anästhesie MVZ Karst, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - O Kunitz
- Klinik für Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin, Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen, Trier, Deutschland
| | - R Löb
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensiv‑, Notfall- und Schmerzmedizin, St. Barbara-Klinik, Hamm, Deutschland
| | - W Meißner
- Klinik für Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Deutschland
| | - P Meybohm
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - B Mierke
- Klinik für Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin, Krankenhaus St. Elisabeth, Damme, Deutschland
| | - F Pabst
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivtherapie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Rostock, Deutschland
| | - G Schaelte
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland
| | - J Schiff
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, operative Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Deutschland
| | - M Soehle
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland
| | - M Winterhalter
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Schmerztherapie, Klinikum Bremen-Mitte, Bremen, Deutschland
| | - A Kowark
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Apfelbacher C, Brandstetter S, Blecha S, Dodoo-Schittko F, Brandl M, Karagiannidis C, Quintel M, Kluge S, Putensen C, Bercker S, Ellger B, Kirschning T, Arndt C, Meybohm P, Weber-Carstens S, Bein T. Influence of quality of intensive care on quality of life/return to work in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome: prospective observational patient cohort study (DACAPO). BMC Public Health 2020; 20:861. [PMID: 32503583 PMCID: PMC7275400 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-08943-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2019] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Significant long-term reduction in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is often observed in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and return to work (RtW) is limited. There is a paucity of data regarding the relationship between the quality of care (QoC) in the intensive care unit (ICU) and both HRQoL and RtW in ARDS survivors. Therefore, the aim of our study was to investigate associations between indicators of QoC and HRQoL and RtW in a cohort of survivors of ARDS. Methods To determine the influence of QoC on HRQoL and RtW 1 year after ICU-discharge, ARDS patients were recruited into a prospective multi-centre patient cohort study and followed up regularly after discharge. Patients were asked to complete self-report questionnaires on HRQoL (Short Form 12 physical component scale (PCS) and mental component scale (MCS)) and RtW. Indicators of QoC pertaining to volume, structural and process quality, and general characteristics were recorded on ICU level. Associations between QoC indicators and HrQoL and RtW were investigated by multivariable linear and Cox regression modelling, respectively. B values and hazard ratios (HRs) are reported with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results 877 (of initially 1225 enrolled) people with ARDS formed the DACAPO survivor cohort, 396 were finally followed up to 1 year after discharge. The twelve-month survivors were characterized by a reduced HRQoL with a greater impairment in the physical component (Md 41.2 IQR [34–52]) compared to the mental component (Md 47.3 IQR [33–57]). Overall, 50% of the patients returned to work. The proportion of ventilated ICU patients showed significant negative associations with both 12 months PCS (B = − 11.22, CI −20.71; − 1,74) and RtW (HR = 0,18, CI 0,04;0,80). All other QoC indicators were not significantly related to outcome. Conclusions Associations between ICU QoC and long-term HrQoL and RtW were weak and largely non-significant. Residual confounding by case mix, treatment variables before or during ICU stay and variables pertaining to the post intensive care period (e.g. rehabilitation) cannot be ruled out. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.govNCT02637011. (December 22, 2015, retrospectively registered)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Apfelbacher
- Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
| | - Susanne Brandstetter
- Medical Sociology, Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, 93051, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Blecha
- Department of Anesthesia & Operative Intensive Care, University Hospital Regensburg, 93042, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Frank Dodoo-Schittko
- Medical Sociology, Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, 93051, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Magdalena Brandl
- Medical Sociology, Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, 93051, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Christian Karagiannidis
- Department of Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Cologne-Merheim Hospital, ARDS and ECMO Centre, Kliniken der Stadt Köln, Witten/Herdecke University Hospital, 51109, Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael Quintel
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medicine, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Stefan Kluge
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre, Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Putensen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care, University Hospital Bonn, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Sven Bercker
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Björn Ellger
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Klinikum Dortmund, 44137, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Thomas Kirschning
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Mannheim, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Christian Arndt
- Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care, University Hospital Marburg, 35042, Marburg, Germany
| | - Patrick Meybohm
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Steffen Weber-Carstens
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité -University Medicine Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Bein
- Department of Anesthesia & Operative Intensive Care, University Hospital Regensburg, 93042, Regensburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bodmann KF, Höhl R, Krüger W, Grabein B, Graninger W. Calculated initial parenteral treatment of bacterial infections: Sepsis. GMS INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2020; 8:Doc09. [PMID: 32373434 PMCID: PMC7186805 DOI: 10.3205/id000053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
This is the eleventh chapter of the guideline "Calculated initial parenteral treatment of bacterial infections in adults - update 2018" in the 2nd updated version. The German guideline by the Paul-Ehrlich-Gesellschaft für Chemotherapie e.V. (PEG) has been translated to address an international audience. Sepsis, defined as a life threatening organ dysfunction caused by a misregulated host response to an infection, is the third leading cause of death in Germany with a lethality rate of 30% to over 50%. An early, effective antimicrobial therapy is, next to infectious source control, the most important causal treatment option. It should be complemented by the mainly supportive measures of general intensive care therapy. Prior antimicrobial therapy, the patient's medical history (e.g. risk factors for multiresistant agents) and small-scale epidemiology are to be considered as part of the therapeutic and practical decisions. A modification of the often needed broad initial calculated combination therapy is desirable. In the future, prompt measurements of plasma concentrations of antiinfectives, especially for the sepsis patient with diverse and partly conflicting pathophysiological changes, will have great importance regarding efficacy, toxicity and resistance development. In order to apply those complex strategies in clinical routine, there is a requirement for a strong interdisciplinary collaboration between the intensive care unit, clinical infectiology, microbiology, and clinical pharmacology, ideally in the framework of a functional antimicrobial stewardship program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klaus-Friedrich Bodmann
- Klinik für Internistische Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin und Klinische Infektiologie, Klinikum Barnim GmbH, Werner Forßmann Krankenhaus, Eberswalde, Germany
| | - Rainer Höhl
- Institut für Klinikhygiene, Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Klinische Infektiologie, Klinikum Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Krüger
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Klinikum Konstanz, Germany
| | - Beatrice Grabein
- Stabsstelle Klinische Mikrobiologie und Krankenhaushygiene, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lentsck MH, Oliveira RRD, Corona LP, Mathias TADF. Risk factors for death of trauma patients admitted to an Intensive Care Unit. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2020; 28:e3236. [PMID: 32074207 PMCID: PMC7021481 DOI: 10.1590/1518-8345.3482.3236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2019] [Accepted: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze the risk factors for death of trauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). METHOD Retrospective cohort study with data from medical records of adults hospitalized for trauma in a general intensive care unit. We included patients 18 years of age and older and admitted for injuries. The variables were grouped into levels in a hierarchical manner. The distal level included sociodemographic variables, hospitalization, cause of trauma and comorbidities; the intermediate, the characteristics of trauma and prehospital care; the proximal, the variables of prognostic indices, intensive admission, procedures and complications. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS The risk factors associated with death at the distal level were age 60 years or older and comorbidities; at intermediate level, severity of trauma and proximal level, severe circulatory complications, vasoactive drug use, mechanical ventilation, renal dysfunction, failure to perform blood culture on admission and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II. CONCLUSION The identified factors are useful to compose a clinical profile and to plan intensive care to avoid complications and deaths of traumatized patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maicon Henrique Lentsck
- Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Departamento de Enfermagem, Maringá, PR, Brazil.,Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste, Departamento de Enfermagem, Guarapuava, PR, Brazil
| | - Rosana Rosseto de Oliveira
- Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Departamento de Enfermagem, Maringá, PR, Brazil.,Scholarship holder at the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Brazil
| | - Ligiana Pires Corona
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Ciências Aplicadas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
[Quality indicators in intensive care medicine : Background and practical use]. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 2019; 116:17-28. [PMID: 31822943 DOI: 10.1007/s00063-019-00630-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2019] [Revised: 09/16/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Quality indicators are used in medicine to indirectly reflect quality via key figures. Intensive care medicine, in particular, contains a large number of standard processes for which quality monitoring is a suitable solution. The indicators used in quality assurance have advantages and disadvantages. The evaluation of fundamental aspects of the use of indicators in intensive care medicine can be illustrated by means of different types of indicators. A comparison of different indicators-the intensive care quality indicators of the DIVI (Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin [German interdisciplinary association for intensive care and emergency medicine]) and a selection of international indicators-shows possible benefits of indicators, but also their limits in applicability and meaningfulness. The comparison also takes into account the possible applicability for individual institutions. There is no gold standard for the development of quality indicators. Nevertheless, methodological progress has been made in this area in recent years. Since the use of indicators has so far been unable to demonstrate any scientifically verifiable benefit for patient outcome, this aspect will have to come into the focus regarding development and application in the future. In addition, topics for the development of key figures are mentioned, which above all must be oriented more strongly towards the long-term well-being of patients.
Collapse
|
25
|
Brinkmann A, Röhr AC, Köberer A, Fuchs T, Krüger WA, König C, Richter D, Weigand MA, Frey OR. [Adequate anti-infective treatment : Importance of individual dosing and application]. Anaesthesist 2019; 67:461-476. [PMID: 29766208 DOI: 10.1007/s00101-018-0443-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Sepsis-induced changes in pharmacokinetic parameters are a well-known problem in intensive care medicine. Dosing of antibiotics in this setting is therefore challenging. Alterations to the substance-specific kinetics of anti-infective substances have an effect on the distribution and excretion processes in the body. Increased clearance and an increased distribution volume (Vd) and particularly compromized organ function with reduced antibiotic elimination are often encountered in patients with sepsis. Renal replacement treatment, which is frequently used in intensive care medicine, represents a substantial intervention in this system. Current international guidelines recommend individualized dosing strategies and adaptation of doses according to measured serum levels and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters as concepts to optimize anti-infective therapy in the critically ill. Likewise, the recommendation to adjust the administration form of beta-lactam antibiotics to prolonged or continuous infusion can be found increasingly more often in the literature. This article reviews the background of the individual dosing in intensive care patients and their applicability to the clinical routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Brinkmann
- Klinik für Anästhesie, operative Intensivmedizin und spezielle Schmerztherapie, Klinikum Heidenheim, Schlosshaustr. 100, 89522, Heidenheim, Deutschland.
| | - A C Röhr
- Apotheke, Klinikum Heidenheim, Heidenheim, Deutschland
| | - A Köberer
- Klinik für Anästhesie, operative Intensivmedizin und spezielle Schmerztherapie, Klinikum Heidenheim, Schlosshaustr. 100, 89522, Heidenheim, Deutschland
| | - T Fuchs
- Klinik für Anästhesie, operative Intensivmedizin und spezielle Schmerztherapie, Klinikum Heidenheim, Schlosshaustr. 100, 89522, Heidenheim, Deutschland
| | - W A Krüger
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Klinikum Konstanz, Konstanz, Deutschland
| | - C König
- Klinik für Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.,Klinikapotheke, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - D Richter
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - M A Weigand
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - O R Frey
- Apotheke, Klinikum Heidenheim, Heidenheim, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Information on nosocomial infections in the mainstream media: an opinion document. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE QUIMIOTERAPIA : PUBLICACION OFICIAL DE LA SOCIEDAD ESPANOLA DE QUIMIOTERAPIA 2019; 32:165-177. [PMID: 30880377 PMCID: PMC6441986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
This paper seeks to explore the reasons for the low impact of nosocomial infection in the mainstream media and the responsibilities of physicians and journalists in terms of this situation. To this end, a small group of 13 experts met for round-table discussions, including physicians with expertise in nosocomial infection, medical lawsuits and ethics, as well as journalists from major mainstream Spanish media outlets. The various participants were asked a series of questions prior to the meeting, which were answered in writing by one of the speakers and discussed during the meeting by the whole group, the aim being to obtain consensual conclusions for each of them. The document was subsequently reviewed, edited and forwarded to all co-authors for their agreement. The opinions expressed are the personal opinions of the participants and not necessarily those of the institutions in which they work or with which they collaborate.
Collapse
|
27
|
Ürkmez S, Erdoğan E, Utku T, Dikmen Y. Sedation Practices and Preferences of Turkish Intensive Care Physicians: A National Survey. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 2019; 47:220-227. [PMID: 31183469 DOI: 10.5152/tjar.2019.49799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Accepted: 10/08/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Sedation is one of the most common practices applied in the intensive care units (ICUs), and the management of sedation, analgesia and delirium is a quality measure in the ICUs. Several guidelines on sedation had been published, and many surveys investigated the practices of sedation in the ICUs, but knowledge on the sedation practices in Turkey is lacking. The aim of the present study was to provide baseline knowledge on the sedation practices and preferences of Turkish intensive care physicians and to establish some points to be improved. Methods An electronic survey form consisting of 34 questions was generated and posted to email addresses. The survey included questions about demographics and practices on sedation, analgesia, neuromuscular blockage and delirium. Results Of 1700 email addresses, 429 (25.0%) were returned. Sedation was practised by 98.0% of the respondents, and mechanical ventilation was indicated as the primary indication (94.0%) for sedation. The presence of a written sedation protocol was 37.0%. For drug choices for sedation, midazolam was the most preferred agent (90.0%). With regard to pain questions, the most commonly used evaluation tool was Visual Analogue Scale (69.0%), and the most preferred drug was tramadol. Nearly half of the participants routinely evaluated delirium and used the confusion assessment method in the ICU. Conclusion The results of this survey have indicated some areas to be improved, and a national guideline should be prepared taking pain, agitation and delirium in focus. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03488069.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seval Ürkmez
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Elif Erdoğan
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Tuğhan Utku
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Yalım Dikmen
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Hartog CS, Jöbges S, Kumpf O, Janssens U. [Communicating with families in the ICU : Background and practical recommendations]. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 2018; 113:231-242. [PMID: 29556682 DOI: 10.1007/s00063-018-0417-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2018] [Revised: 02/13/2018] [Accepted: 02/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Family members of adult intensive care patients are partners of the interdisciplinary team. Family members provide important contributions to patient-centered care in the intensive care unit (ICU) and beyond. At the same time, family members are stressed and are themselves in need of support ("family-centered care"). This is mainly provided through family conferences. Family members must always be treated respectfully and with consideration for their acute stress syndrome. A structured communication is recommended as well as written standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for the ICU team and brochures and written guidelines for relatives. Documentation of structured family conferences is an established quality indicator of intensive care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C S Hartog
- Patienten- und Angehörigenzentrierte Versorgung, Klinik Bavaria, An der Wolfsschlucht 1, 01731, Kreischa, Deutschland. .,Klinik für Anästhesiologie mit Schwerpunkt operative Intensivmedizin, Campus Charité Mitte und Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.
| | - S Jöbges
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie mit Schwerpunkt operative Intensivmedizin, Campus Charité Mitte und Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - O Kumpf
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie mit Schwerpunkt operative Intensivmedizin, Campus Charité Mitte und Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - U Janssens
- Klinik für Innere Medizin und Internistische Intensivmedizin, St.-Antonius-Hospital, Eschweiler, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
[Reimbursement of intensive care services in the German DRG system : Current problems and possible solutions]. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 2017; 113:13-23. [PMID: 29270667 DOI: 10.1007/s00063-017-0390-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2017] [Accepted: 11/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The reimbursement of intensive care and nursing services in the German health system is based on the diagnosis-related groups (G-DRG) system. Due to the lack of a central hospital planning, the G‑DRG system has become the most important influence on the development of the German health system. Compared to other countries, intensive care in Germany is characterized by a high number of intensive care beds, a low nurse-to-patient ratio, no official definition of the level of care, and a minimal available data set from intensive care units (ICUs). Under the given circumstances, a shortage of qualified intensive care nurses and physicians is currently the largest threat for intensive care in Germany. To address these deficiencies, we suggest the following measures: (1) Integration of ICUs into the levels of care which are currently developed for emergency centers at hospitals. (2) Mandatory collection of structured data sets from all ICUs including quality criteria. (3) A reform of intensive care and nursing reimbursement under consideration of adequate staffing in the individual ICU. (4) Actions to improve ICU staffing and qualification.
Collapse
|