Awareness of Self and Disease Assessment: Development and Validation of a Subjective Measure in People with Alzheimer’s Disease

The use of virtual reality as a perspective-taking manipulation to improve self-awareness in Alzheimer's disease

Lack of awareness of symptoms or having a condition referred to as anosognosia is a common feature of individuals with Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Previous literature on AD reported difficulties in evaluating self-abilities, often showing underestimation of limitations. There is increasing evidence that the perspective through which information is presented may moderate the performance appraisal and that anosognosia in AD might be a consequence of a deficit in assuming a third-person perspective. In this context, some studies showed that subjects may better recognize self-and other-difficulties when exposed to a third-person perspective. Considering the variety of approaches aiming to investigate the lack of awareness, there is still a scarcity of methods that provide great ecological validity and consider more than one facet of awareness, thus failing to offer more accurate evaluations of daily experiences. The present paper primarily addresses the theme of the multidimensional character of awareness of abilities in AD and the effect of perspective-taking on its trajectories. The focus turns to virtual reality as a promising tool for a greater evaluation of perspective-taking and self-awareness. Particularly, these systems offer the possibility to involve users in cognitive and sensorimotor tasks that simulate daily life conditions within immersive and realistic environments, and a great sense of embodiment. We propose that virtual reality might allow a great level of complexity, veracity, and safety that is needed for individuals with AD to behave according to their actual abilities and enable to explore the liaison between the subject's viewpoint, performance, and self-evaluation. In addition, we suggest promising clinical implications of virtual reality-based methods for individualized assessments, investigating specific impacts on subjects' life and possible improvements in their awareness.

Awareness for People With Alzheimer’s Disease: Profiles and Weekly Trajectories

Objective: To understand awareness and fluctuations of awareness in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), it is fruitful to consider the objects of awareness, e.g., cognitive functioning or recognition of the disease, as well as the mechanisms and modes of expression underlying awareness. With a holistic and discourse-centered approach, we aimed to identify different awareness profiles and test whether these profiles were stable or whether transitions from one profile to another occurred over short time intervals.

Methods: Twenty-eight residents of nursing homes with a diagnosis of AD participated in four semistructured interviews at biweekly intervals. These interviews were cluster analyzed to determine profiles of awareness. A Markov chain was applied to model their fluctuation.

Results: Five awareness profiles were observed that differed in terms of objects and underlying processes. Awareness proved to be quite stable for four of the five profiles. Interindividual variability in awareness was also observed through numerous different trajectories that were identified.

Discussion: Self-awareness and disease awareness are characterized by profiles that vary subtly between individuals. Fluctuations in awareness underscore the need to employ assessment intervals that closely reflect daily life in institutions.

Awareness dimensions and associated factors in Alzheimer's disease

OBJECTIVES

We recently reported the major role depression and apathy in awareness among Alzheimer patients, using the stage of the disease as an exposure factor and exploring different assessment methods. Using the same patient data, we aimed here to explore the different dimensions of awareness assessed by different sub-scales in awareness scales.

METHOD

Sixty-one Alzheimer patients were examined using four awareness scales relating to three assessment methods: (a) patient-caregiver discrepancy; (b) clinical rating; and (c) prediction of performance discrepancy. Global cognition, executive functioning, autonomy, depression and apathy were also assessed. Multivariate logistic models were performed using disease stage as an exposure factor for awareness scales and sub-scales. Correlations across the different factors and patient and caregiver awareness ratings were computed.

RESULTS

The patient-caregiver discrepancy and clinical rating methods (a, b) both identified the factors associated with awareness in the overall scales and the sub-scales as being depression and/or apathy. Depression correlated with patient self-ratings while apathy correlated with caregiver ratings. The prediction of performance discrepancy method (c) identified different factors in the overall scale, executive factors in three sub-scales involving executive domains and the memory factor in a sub-scale involving the mnesic domain.

DISCUSSION

The awareness scales using a referential based on a human rating (a, b) suggest that awareness is unidimensional, with depression impacting self-reports and apathy influencing caregiver/clinical reports. Scales based on a test rating (c) appear to be more closely associated with the dimensions assessed. This highlights the role of the reference system for awareness assessment in Alzheimer's disease.

Alzheimer's and Consciousness: How Much Subjectivity Is Objective?

Does Alzheimer Disease show a decline in cognitive functions that relate to the awareness of external reality? In this paper, we will propose a perspective that patients with increasing symptoms of AD show a change in the awareness of subjective versus objective representative axis of reality thus consequently move to a more internal like perception of reality. This paradigm shift suggests that new insights into the dynamicity of the conscious representation of reality in the AD brain may give us new clues to the very early signs of memory and self-awareness impairment that originates from, in our view the microtubules. Dialog between Adso and William, in Umberto Eco's The Name of the Rose, Third Day: Vespers. "But how does it happen," I said with admiration, "that you were able to solve the mystery of the library looking at it from the outside, and you were unable to solve it when you were inside?" "Thus, God knows the world, because He conceived it in His mind, as if it was from the outside, before it was created, and we do not know its rule, because we live inside it, having found it already made."

Higher Depression of Patients with Alzheimer's Disease During than Before the Lockdown

We assessed depression in 72 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) who live in retirement homes during the COVID-19-related lockdown. We invited caregivers of 72 patients with AD who live in retirement homes to rate depression in the patients both before and during the lockdown. Analysis demonstrated increased depression in the patients during the lockdown. We attribute this increased depression to the restrictive measures on activities, visits, and physical contact between patients with AD and family members during the lockdown.

Anosognosia in dementia: A review of current assessment instruments

INTRODUCTION

Anosognosia is a common but underrated symptom in dementia and has significant impact on both patients and caregivers. A proper evaluation of anosognosia is therefore desirable. There are three common methods to determine anosognosia: (1) clinical rating, (2) patient-caregiver discrepancies, and (3) prediction of performance discrepancies. Each of them includes different instruments. This review gives an overview of the current instruments used for the assessment of anosognosia in patients with dementia and aims to determine the most suitable instrument for routine use in clinical practice.

METHODS

A search of the literature in PubMed was performed. Furthermore, electronic databases (PsycINFo, ClinicalKey, and Cochrane Library) and reference lists were searched for additional articles.

RESULTS

Forty-six articles were included in this study, comprising 10 clinical rating instruments, 25 patient-caregiver discrepancy instruments, and 14 prediction-performance discrepancy instruments. For every publication, the aims of the study, the included population, the assessment instrument used, the assessed domains, and the psychometric properties of the assessment instruments are described.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, there is no consensus on the most suitable method to determine anosognosia in dementia. We recommend the Clinical Insight Rating scale and the Abridged Anosognosia Questionnaire-Dementia as the most appropriate for routine use in clinical practice.

Modelling Awareness in Alzheimer's Disease

This study aimed to provide a model of awareness in Alzheimer's disease using the stage of the disease as a risk factor. Awareness was assessed using three methods (patient-caregiver discrepancy, prediction-performance discrepancy, clinical rating). Twenty-five healthy control subjects and sixty-one patients participated, with measures of cognition, apathy, depression, and awareness. These measures were introduced into a manual backward regression. Confounding factors impacting at least 15% of the exposure factor estimate were maintained in the model. Except for the prediction performance discrepancy, also presenting cognitive associations, the other awareness assessments suggested a major role of depression and apathy as impacting factors.

"What" and "How": A New Perspective for Understanding Unawareness in Alzheimer's Disease Through a Combination of Two Perspectives

OBJECTIVES

Assessments of unawareness in Alzheimer's disease mainly focus on the objects (the "what") of unawareness. A recent person-centered approach proposes to also assess the processes (the "how"). The present study combines 2 approaches to understand this heterogeneity in assessments of unawareness.

METHOD

We recruited 46 participants from 8 nursing homes. They underwent a semi-structured interview and were assessed using a prediction-performance paradigm. Spearman correlations were calculated, and generalized additive models were established.

RESULTS

The 2 approaches are associated through cognitive deficits, confrontation with difficulties and identity changes. Objects (the what), mechanisms, and modes of expression (the how) explain at least 29.6% of the variance of unawareness.

CONCLUSIONS

Unawareness is more than simply being unaware of something; it is a synergy between the objects and processes of arousal and expression. Moreover, unawareness extends beyond the disease to include the self. Considering the entire person seems to be necessary.