Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 1 Treated with Nusinersen

Motor function and compound muscle action potential amplitude in children with spinal muscular atrophy treated with nusinersen

BACKGROUND

Disease-modifying therapies can improve motor function in patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), but efficacy varies between individuals. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nusinersen treatment in children with SMA and to investigate prognostic factors.

METHODS

Motor function, compound muscle action potential (CMAP), and other indicators were prospectively collected before and 14 months after nusinersen treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 55 children were included in our study to assess safety. 41 patients (with at least 6 months of nusinersen treatment) were included in the final efficacy analyses, with a median age at first treatment of 4.2 years. After 14 months of treatment with nusinersen, motor function improved, with increases in CHOP INTEND (Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders), HINE-2 (Hammersmith Infant Neurological Exam-Part 2), HFMSE (Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale-Expanded) and RULM (Revised Upper Limb Module) of 5.5 (95 % CI -2.4-13.4), 0.8 (95 % CI -0.2-1.9), 5.0 (95 % CI 2.5-7.4) and 2.4 (95 % CI 0.7-4.1) points, respectively. The CMAP amplitudes of the bilateral tibial, median and ulnar nerves increased, with greatest improvements of 0.87 ± 1.41 mV, 1.08 ± 1.71 mV and 0.59 ± 1.01 mV, respectively. Spearman correlation analysis showed that age at first treatment, disease duration, joint contractures and scoliosis were associated with treatment efficacy (r = -0.4-0.7, P < 0.05). Subgroup analyses showed that the mean HFMSE and RULM scores improved in the Physical therapy group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Early treatment, mild bone and joint complications, and regular rehabilitation training were associated with better outcomes. The other motor-related functions, such as respiratory and bullar function, and prognostic factors should be studied in the future.

Gene-based therapy for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy types 1 and 2 : a systematic review and meta-analysis

Despite numerous studies identifying the advantages of therapies for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), healthcare professionals encounter obstacles in determining the most effective treatment. This study aimed to investigate the effects of gene-based therapy for SMA. A systematic search was conducted from inception to May 2024 across databases, and all studies assessing the effects of gene-based therapy on patients with SMA types 1 and 2 were included. The outcomes measured were survival, the need for ventilatory support, improvements in motor function, and the occurrence of adverse drug reactions. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model. A total of 57 studies (n = 3418) were included, and the meta-analyses revealed that onasemnogene abeparvovec showed the highest survival rate (95% [95% CI: 88, 100]), followed by risdiplam (86% [95% CI: 76, 94]) and nusinersen (60% [95% CI: 50, 70]). The number of patients needing ventilatory support was reduced after treatment with onasemnogene abeparvovec (risk ratio = 0·10 [95% CI: 0·02, 0·53]). Onasemnogene abeparvovec and risdiplam had similar proportions of patients with improvements in the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders score of ≥4 points (92% [95% CI: 62, 100] vs 90% [95% CI: 77, 97]). In contrast, nusinersen had the smallest improvement (74% [95% CI: 66, 81]). The most frequently observed adverse drug reactions were headaches, vomiting, and gastrointestinal disorders. Gene-based therapy benefits patient survival and improves motor function. Onasemnogene abeparvovec and risdiplam appear highly effective, whereas nusinersen exhibits moderate effectiveness.

Nutrition outcomes of disease modifying therapies in spinal muscular atrophy: A systematic review

The nutritional implications of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) are profound. Disease modifying therapies (DMT) have improved clinical outcomes. This review describes the impact of DMT on nutrition outcomes. A systematic search strategy was applied across seven databases until May 2023. Eligible studies measured nutrition outcomes in individuals with SMA on DMT (nusinersen, risdiplam or onasemnogene abeparvovec [OA]) compared to untreated comparators. Nutrition outcomes included anthropometry, feeding route, swallowing dysfunction, dietary intake, dietetic intervention, nutritional biochemistry, metabolism, gastrointestinal issues and energy expenditure. Articles retrieved were screened in duplicate, data were extracted and appraised systematically. Sixty three articles from 54 studies were included; 41% (n = 22) investigated nusinersen in pediatric participants with SMA type 1. Anthropometry (n = 18), feeding route (n = 39), and swallowing dysfunction (n = 18) were the most commonly reported outcomes. In combined pediatric and adult cohorts, BMI z-score remained stable post nusinersen therapy. The proportion of children with SMA requiring enteral nutrition was stable post nusinersen therapy. Ability to thrive at age 1.5 years was higher in children treated in early infancy with OA compared to historical controls. Significant heterogeneity existed across study population characteristics and outcome measures. Nusinersen may prevent deterioration in some nutrition outcomes; and OA in early infancy may be associated with improved nutrition outcomes. Timing of DMT initiation is an important consideration for future nutrition research. Studies investigating nutrition as a primary outcome of DMT, using consistent outcome measures are required for nutritional management strategies for this cohort to be appropriately tailored.

Type-1 spinal muscular atrophy cohort before and after disease-modifying therapies

BACKGROUND

 Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA-5q) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive muscle atrophy, hypotonia, and weakness, with SMA 1 presenting symptoms within the first 6 months of life. Disease-modifying therapies have been approved, with better outcomes with earlier treatment.

OBJECTIVE

 To describe the safety and clinical efficacy of disease-modifying therapies based on SMN1 and SMN2 gene strategies concerning motor, respiratory, and bulbar function. Patients with SMA 1 were divided into 2 groups: those exclusively on nusinersen (group 1) and those transitioning to onasemnogene abeparvovec (OA) (group 2).

METHODS

 Over 18 months, patients were assessed using the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders (CHOP-INTEND) scale, developmental milestones, ventilation needs and duration, nutritional support needs, consistency of food, and signs of dysphagia. There were ten patients, divided between the groups; in group 1, the average age for starting nusinersen was 53.6 (12-115) months, and, in group 2, the age was 7 (1-12) months for nusinersen and 15.2 (10-19) months for OA.

RESULTS

 Our results indicate that 70% of patients reached some motor milestones, with group 1 increasing by 10.2 points on the CHOP-INTEND scale, while group 2 increased by 33 points. Additionally, 90% of the patients experienced no respiratory decline, and 30% maintained oral feeding. No serious adverse effects or deaths were recorded.

CONCLUSION

 Both groups showed improvement in motor function and stabilization of respiratory and bulbar function, with the difference between the groups possibly being related to the earlier treatment initiation. Thus, the present study provides valuable insights into the real-world safety and clinical efficacy of disease-modifying therapies for SMA 1 patients.

Treatment Options in Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Pragmatic Approach for Clinicians

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a rare neurodegenerative neuromuscular disorder with a wide phenotypic spectrum of severity. SMA was previously life limiting for patients with the most severe phenotype and resulted in progressive disability for those with less severe phenotypes. This has changed dramatically in the past few years with the approvals of three disease-modifying treatments. We review the evidence supporting the use of currently approved SMA treatments (nusinersen, onasemnogene abeparvovec, and risdiplam), focusing on mechanisms of action, side effect profiles, published clinical trial data, health economics, and pending questions. Whilst there is robust data from clinical trials of efficacy and side effect profile for individual drugs in select SMA populations, there are no comparative head-to-head clinical trials. This presents a challenge for clinicians who need to make recommendations on the best treatment option for an individual patient and we hope to provide a pragmatic approach for clinicians across each SMA profile based on current evidence.

Gene replacement therapy for spinal muscular atrophy: safety and preliminary efficacy in a Brazilian cohort

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a motor neuron disease associated with progressive muscle weakness, ventilatory failure, and reduced survival. Onasemnogene abeparvovec is the first gene replacement therapy (GT) approved to treat this condition. An observational retrospective study was conducted to assess adverse events and efficacy of GT in SMA patients. Forty-one patients with SMA (58.5% females and 80.1% SMA type 1) were included. The mean age at GT dosing was 18 (±6.4) months. Thirty-six patients (87.8%) were under previous treatment with nusinersen, and 10 (24.4%) continued nusinersen after GT. Mean CHOP-INTEND increased 13 points after 6 months and this finding did not differ between groups according to nusinersen maintenance after GT (p = 0.949). Among SMA type 1 patients, 14 (46.6%) reached the ability to sit alone. Liver transaminases elevation at least two times higher than the upper limit of normal value occurred in 29 (70.7%) patients. Thrombocytopenia occurred in 13 (31.7%) patients, and one presented thrombotic microangiopathy. Older age (>2 years) was associated with more prolonged use of corticosteroids (p = 0.021). GT is effective in SMA patients, combined nusinersen after GT did not appear to add gain in motor function and older age is associated with prolonged corticosteroid use.

Gene-based therapies for neuromuscular disorders

Neuromuscular diseases (NMD) include a broad group of medical conditions with both acquired and genetic causes. In recent years, important advances have been made in the treatment of genetically caused NMD, and most of these advances are due to the implementation of therapies aimed at gene regulation. Among these therapies, gene replacement, small interfering RNA (siRNA), and antisense antinucleotides are the most promising approaches. More importantly, some of these therapies have already gained regulatory approval or are in the final stages of approval. The review focuses on motor neuron diseases, neuropathies, and Duchenne muscular dystrophy, summarizing the most recent developments in gene-based therapies for these conditions.

Long-Term Follow-Up Cares and Check Initiative: A Program to Advance Long-Term Follow-Up in Newborns Identified with a Disease through Newborn Screening

In the United States and around the world, newborns are screened on a population basis for conditions benefiting from pre-symptomatic diagnosis and treatment. The number of screened conditions continues to expand as novel technologies for screening, diagnosing, treating, and managing disease are discovered. While screening all newborns facilitates early diagnosis and treatment, most screened conditions are treatable but not curable. Patients identified by newborn screening often require lifelong medical management and community support to achieve the best possible outcome. To advance the long-term follow-up of infants identified through newborn screening (NBS), the Long-Term Follow-up Cares and Check Initiative (LTFU-Cares and Check) designed, implemented, and evaluated a system of longitudinal data collection and annual reporting engaging parents, clinical providers, and state NBS programs. The LTFU-Cares and Check focused on newborns identified with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) through NBS and the longitudinal health information prioritized by parents and families. Pediatric neurologists who care for newborns with SMA entered annual data, and data tracking and visualization tools were delivered to state NBS programs with a participating clinical center. In this publication, we report on the development, use of, and preliminary results from the LTFU-Cares and Check Initiative, which was designed as a comprehensive model of LTFU. We also propose next steps for achieving the goal of a national system of LTFU for individuals with identified conditions by meaningfully engaging public health agencies, clinicians, parents, families, and communities.

Safety and efficacy of growth-friendly instrumentation for early-onset scoliosis in patients with spinal muscular atrophy type 1 in the disease-modifying treatment era

Purpose

To evaluate the safety of growth-friendly instrumentation for early-onset scoliosis (EOS) in patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) type 1 who received disease-modifying treatment (DMT) and analyze short-term efficacy.

Methods

Retrospective search was conducted between 2017 and 2023. Patients with genetically confirmed SMA type 1 who were surgically treated for spinal deformity and receiving DMTs (nusinersen, risdiplam, or onasemnogene abeparvovec) were included. SMA types 2 and 3 and patients who do not receive DMTs were excluded. Clinical and radiographic data were collected at preoperative, postoperative, and latest follow-up visits.

Results

Twenty-eight patients (mean follow-up: 16 months (range 2-41)) were included. The mean age at surgery was 60 months (range 29-96). Fifteen were treated with dual magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR), four with unilateral MCGR and a contralateral guided growth system, three with Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib (VEPTR®) implants, five with self-distracting systems, and one with traditional dual growing rods. The mean amount of correction was 57% (44°± 17) for scoliosis and 83% (13°± 11) for pelvic obliquity. The mean T1-12 height gain during surgery was 31 mm (±16 mm), while the mean T1 S1 height gain was 51 mm (±24 mm), and instrumented growth was observed during follow-up. Five patients (18%) developed six serious adverse events: three surgical site infections, two anchor failures, and one rod fracture, and all required unplanned reoperations. No neurologic complication, difficulty during nusinersen injections, or respiratory decline was recorded.

Conclusion

We report that spinal deformity in this population can be safely treated with growth-friendly instrumentation, with similar complication rates when compared with SMA type 2.

Evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of current drug treatments on the clinical outcomes of paediatric spinal muscular atrophy type 1: A systematic review

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a severe hereditary lower motor neuron disorder characterised by degeneration of alpha motor neurons in the spinal cord, resulting in progressive weakness and paralysis of proximal muscles. A systematic literature search was carried out by using PRISMA guidelines and searching through different databases that could provide findings of evidence on the health outcomes of the approved therapies for the management of paediatric SMA type 1 regarding efficacy with follow-up in terms of motor and respiratory functions and the tolerability and incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) post-treatment from real-world publications. Half of the publications (50%) had a prospective observational design. Eight studies (66.7%) assessed nusinersen, and three studies (25%) assessed onasemnogene abeparvovec with a duration of follow-up ranging from 6 months to 3 years to evaluate the motor and respiratory functions using different assessment tools, hospitalisation rates, and the tolerability and incidence of ADRs post-treatment. The three currently approved treatments for SMA type 1 provided good support and health outcomes in terms of motor function, respiratory outcomes, reduction of hospitalisations, and improvement of survival. Nevertheless, uncertainties regarding continued improvement after long-term illness and the generalizability of results are still unknown.

A Critical Appraisal of Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons in Spinal Muscular Atrophy

In the absence of head-to-head trials, indirect treatment comparisons (ITCs) are often used to compare the efficacy of different therapies to support decision-making. Matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC), a type of ITC, is increasingly used to compare treatment efficacy when individual patient data are available from one trial and only aggregate data are available from the other trial. This paper examines the conduct and reporting of MAICs to compare treatments for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), a rare neuromuscular disease. A literature search identified three studies comparing approved treatments for SMA including nusinersen, risdiplam, and onasemnogene abeparvovec. The quality of the MAICs was assessed on the basis of the following principles consolidated from published MAIC best practices: (1) justification for the use of MAIC is clearly stated, (2) the included trials with respect to study population and design are comparable, (3) all known confounders and effect modifiers are identified a priori and accounted for in the analysis, (4) outcomes should be similar in definition and assessment, (5) baseline characteristics are reported before and after adjustment, along with weights, and (6) key details of a MAIC are reported. In the three MAIC publications in SMA to date, the quality of analysis and reporting varied greatly. Various sources of bias in the MAICs were identified, including lack of control for key confounders and effect modifiers, inconsistency in outcome definitions across trials, imbalances in important baseline characteristics after weighting, and lack of reporting key elements. These findings highlight the importance of evaluating MAICs according to best practices when assessing the conduct and reporting of MAICs.

Nusinersen for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III: a retrospective single-center study in South Korea

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the efficacy and safety of nusinersen, an antisense oligonucleotide, in patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) types II (OMIM: 253,550) or III (OMIM: 253,400), including those with severe scoliosis or requiring respiratory support via mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

Data from 40 patients with genetically confirmed SMA who were treated with nusinersen at our institute from March 2019 to April 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Of these, 30 patients with an age of onset < 3 years and not on permanent ventilation were selected. Clinical and genetic characteristics were investigated, and motor function was evaluated based on the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale-Expanded (HFMSE) score.

RESULTS

The mean age of symptom onset was 1.2 years. Most patients were diagnosed with SMA type II (27/30, 90%). Nusinersen was administered via computed tomography-guided or direct intrathecal injection in 87% (26/30) and 13% (4/30) of the patients, respectively. At the 6-, 14-, 22-, and 26-month follow-ups, 72%, 71%, 88%, and 86% of patients showed motor improvement, respectively, with mean changes in HFMSE scores of 2.10, 2.88, 4.21, and 5.29, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that the use of noninvasive ventilation was associated with poorer outcomes of motor function.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with SMA type II or III who received nusinersen treatment showed significant improvement in motor function. A longer treatment duration led to a higher number of patients with improved motor function. No significant side effects of nusinersen were observed. Patients with SMA, even those with severe scoliosis or on respiratory support, can be safely treated using nusinersen.

Changes in Ventilatory Support Requirements of Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Patients Post Gene-Based Therapies

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a genetic neuromuscular disease resulting in global muscular weakness and, frequently, in respiratory failure and premature death. Gene-based therapies like Nusinersen are now available for patients with SMA. The aim of this review was to assess in "real world" studies, whether novel treatments would have a positive impact on the mechanical ventilatory support requirements of SMA patients, already initiated on ventilatory support prior to treatment administration. A literature search was performed in Pubmed using multiple combinations of MESH terms and the snowball procedure. A total of 14 publications were discussed in this review. Considering all patients included in the published studies who were on ventilatory support and were treated with Nusinersen, 13/172 (7.5%) had reduced needs for ventilatory support, 1/172 (0.6%) did not need ventilation post-treatment, and 122/172 (70.9%) were maintained on the same ventilator settings. Moreover, 2/41 (4.9%) children who were offered gene therapy had no need for further ventilatory support and 12/41 (29.2%) had reduced requirements. In conclusion, available evidence suggests that among children with SMA, who are on mechanical respiratory support either noninvasively or via tracheostomy at the time of gene-based treatment, only a few will be weaned off the ventilator or have reduced ventilator needs per 24 h. Children will usually require the same level of support as before treatment.

Mid- and long-term (at least 12 months) follow-up of patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) treated with nusinersen, onasemnogene abeparvovec, risdiplam or combination therapies: A systematic review of real-world study data

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aimed to assess mid- and long-term (at least 12 months) real-world study data from all types of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) patients treated with any of the approved drugs or combination therapies.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was carried out in five databases. Two authors selected the studies based on pre-defined selection criteria and independently graded the risk of bias at study level.

RESULTS

Five hundred forty-six records were identified in the literature search and 22 studies (in 26 publications) were included in the analysis. Nusinersen, onasemnogene abeparvovec and combination therapies improved motor endpoints in SMA type 1 patients. SMA type 2 to type 4 patients treated with nusinersen showed stabilisation or small improvements in motor endpoints with some deterioration observed. Quality of life endpoints, such as respiratory and nutritional support were poorly reported on. Drug-related adverse events occurred rarely in all types of SMA patients with all assessed drugs. Mid- and long-term studies on risdiplam could not be identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The large quantity of missing data and heterogeneity of studies hinder comparability. Although stability and further improvement on the long-term is still uncertain, the results from the included evidence, as well as from pivotal trials show a striking contrast to the natural progression of the disease.