1
|
Allen JR, Karri SR, Yang C, Stoykov ME. Spinal Cord Stimulation for Poststroke Hemiparesis: A Scoping Review. Am J Occup Ther 2024; 78:7802180220. [PMID: 38477681 PMCID: PMC11017736 DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2024.050533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a neuromodulation technique that can improve paresis in individuals with spinal cord injury. SCS is emerging as a technique that can address upper and lower limb hemiparesis. Little is understood about its effectiveness with the poststroke population. OBJECTIVE To summarize the evidence for SCS after stroke and any changes in upper extremity and lower extremity motor function. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and CINAHL. The reviewers used hand searches and reference searches of retrieved articles. There were no limitations regarding publication year. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA COLLECTION This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. The inclusion and exclusion criteria included a broad range of study characteristics. Studies were excluded if the intervention did not meet the definition of SCS intervention, used only animals or healthy participants, did not address upper or lower limb motor function, or examined neurological conditions other than stroke. FINDINGS Fourteen articles met the criteria for this review. Seven studies found a significant improvement in motor function in groups receiving SCS. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Results indicate that SCS may provide an alternative means to improve motor function in the poststroke population. Plain-Language Summary: The results of this study show that spinal cord stimulation may provide an alternative way to improve motor function after stroke. Previous neuromodulation methods have targeted the impaired supraspinal circuitry after stroke. Although downregulated, spinal cord circuitry is largely intact and offers new possibilities for motor recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan R Allen
- Jonathan R. Allen, OTD, OTR/L, is Occupational Therapist, Corewell Health, Grand Rapids, MI. At the time of the study, Allen was Doctoral Student, Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Health Sciences, University of Michigan-Flint;
| | - Swathi R Karri
- Swathi R. Karri, is Osteopathic Medical Student II, Chicago College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL
| | - Chen Yang
- Chen Yang, PhD, is Postdoctoral Fellow, Max Näder Lab for Rehabilitation Technologies and Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, and Postdoctoral Fellow, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Mary Ellen Stoykov
- Mary Ellen Stoykov, PhD, OTR/L, is Research Scientist, Arms + Hands Lab, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, and Research Associate Professor, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fox-Hesling J, Wisseman D, Kantak S. Noninvasive cerebellar stimulation and behavioral interventions: A crucial synergy for post-stroke motor rehabilitation. NeuroRehabilitation 2024; 54:521-542. [PMID: 38943401 DOI: 10.3233/nre-230371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improvement of functional movements after supratentorial stroke occurs through spontaneous biological recovery and training-induced reorganization of remnant neural networks. The cerebellum, through its connectivity with the cortex, brainstem and spinal cord, is actively engaged in both recovery and reorganization processes within the cognitive and sensorimotor systems. Noninvasive cerebellar stimulation (NiCBS) offers a safe, clinically feasible and potentially effective way to modulate the excitability of spared neural networks and promote movement recovery after supratentorial stroke. NiCBS modulates cerebellar connectivity to the cerebral cortex and brainstem, as well as influences the sensorimotor and frontoparietal networks. OBJECTIVE Our objective was twofold: (a) to conduct a scoping review of studies that employed NiCBS to influence motor recovery and learning in individuals with stroke, and (b) to present a theory-driven framework to inform the use of NiCBS to target distinct stroke-related deficits. METHODS A scoping review of current research up to August 2023 was conducted to determine the effect size of NiCBS effect on movement recovery of upper extremity function, balance, walking and motor learning in humans with stroke. RESULTS Calculated effect sizes were moderate to high, offering promise for improving upper extremity, balance and walking outcomes after stroke. We present a conceptual framework that capitalizes on cognitive-motor specialization of the cerebellum to formulate a synergy between NiCBS and behavioral interventions to target specific movement deficits. CONCLUSION NiCBS enhances recovery of upper extremity impairments, balance and walking after stroke. Physiologically-informed synergies between NiCBS and behavioral interventions have the potential to enhance recovery. Finally, we propose future directions in neurophysiological, behavioral, and clinical research to move NiCBS through the translational pipeline and augment motor recovery after stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Darrell Wisseman
- Moss Rehabilitation, Elkins Park, PA, USA
- Department of Physical Therapy, Arcadia University, Glenside, PA, USA
| | - Shailesh Kantak
- Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA, USA
- Department of Physical Therapy, Arcadia University, Glenside, PA, USA
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Qurat-ul-ain, Ahmad Z, Ishtiaq S, Ilyas S, Shahid I, Tariq I, Malik AN, Liu T, Wang J. Short term effects of anodal cerebellar vs. anodal cerebral transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke patients, a randomized control trial. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:1035558. [PMID: 36507323 PMCID: PMC9730515 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1035558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Balance and gait impairments are major motor deficits in stroke patients that require intensive neuro-rehabilitation. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation is a neuro-modulatory technique recently used in stroke patients for balance and gait improvement. Majority of studies focusing on tDCS have assessed its effects on cerebral motor cortex and more recently cerebellum as well but to our best knowledge the comparison of stimulating these two regions in stroke patients is not investigated so far. Objective The current study aimed to compare the effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on cerebellar and cerebral motor cortex M1 in stroke patients. Materials and methods This double-blinded, parallel, randomized, sham controlled trial included 66 patients with a first-ever ischemic stroke were recruited into three groups; Cerebellar stimulation group (CbSG), M1 Stimulation Group (MSG), and Sham stimulation group (SSG). A total of three sessions of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation were given on consecutive days in addition to non-immersive virtual reality using Xbox 360 with kinect. Anodal tDCS with an intensity of 2 mA was applied for a duration of 20 min. Primary outcome measures berg balance scale (BBS), timed up and go test (TUG), BESTest Balance Evaluation-Systems Test (BESTest) and secondary outcomes measures montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA), mini mental state examination (MMSE), Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool (JHFRAT), twenty five feet walk test (25FWT), six minute walk test (6MWT), and tDCS Adverse Effects was assessed before initiation of treatment (T0) and at the end of third session of stimulation (T1). Results The results of between group's analysis using mean difference showed a significant difference with p-value <0.05 for balance (BBS, TUG, BESTest), walking ability (6MWT, 25FWT), risk of fall (JHFRAT). Cognitive function did not show any significant change among the groups for MoCA with p-value >0.05 but MMSE was improved having significant p-value (p = 0.013). However, 6MWT and 25FWT showed non-significant results for both between group and within group analysis. In pairwise comparison both the cerebellar and cerebral stimulation groups showed Significant difference with p-value <0.05 in comparison to sham stimulation; BBS (cerebellar vs. sham p ≤ 0.001, cerebral vs. sham p = 0.011), TUG (cerebellar vs. sham p = 0.001, cerebral vs. sham p = 0.041), Bestest (cerebellar vs. sham p = 0.007, cerebral vs. sham p = 0.003). Whereas for JHFRAT only cerebellar stimulation in comparison to sham and motor cortex stimulation showed significant improvements (cerebellar vs. M1 p = 0.037, cerebellar vs. sham p = 0.037). MMSE showed significant improvement in M1 stimulation (M1 vs. cerebellar p = 0.036, M1 vs. sham p = 0.011). Conclusion Findings of the study suggest anodal tDCS stimulation of the cerebellum and cerebral motor cortex both improves gait, balance and risk of fall in stroke patients. However, both stimulation sites do not induce any notable improvement in cognitive function. Effects of both stimulation sites have similar effects on mobility in stroke patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qurat-ul-ain
- The Key Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education, Institute of Health and Rehabilitation Science, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China,National Engineering Research Center for Healthcare Devices Guangzhou, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China,The Key Laboratory of Neuro-informatics & Rehabilitation Engineering of Ministry of Civil Affairs Xi’an, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Zafran Ahmad
- School of Economics and Management, Yunnan University, Kunming, China
| | - Summaiya Ishtiaq
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Saad Ilyas
- Faculty of Computing, Capital University of Science and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Irum Shahid
- Institute of Physical Medical and Rehabilitation, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan
| | - Iqbal Tariq
- Faculty of Rehabilitation and Allied Health Sciences, Riphah College of Rehabilitation and Allied Health Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Arshad Nawaz Malik
- Faculty of Rehabilitation and Allied Health Sciences, Riphah College of Rehabilitation and Allied Health Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Tian Liu
- The Key Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education, Institute of Health and Rehabilitation Science, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China,National Engineering Research Center for Healthcare Devices Guangzhou, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China,The Key Laboratory of Neuro-informatics & Rehabilitation Engineering of Ministry of Civil Affairs Xi’an, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Jue Wang
- The Key Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education, Institute of Health and Rehabilitation Science, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China,National Engineering Research Center for Healthcare Devices Guangzhou, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China,The Key Laboratory of Neuro-informatics & Rehabilitation Engineering of Ministry of Civil Affairs Xi’an, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China,*Correspondence: Jue Wang,
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Corominas-Teruel X, Mozo RMSS, Simó MF, Colomina Fosch MT, Valero-Cabré A. Transcranial direct current stimulation for gait recovery following stroke: A systematic review of current literature and beyond. Front Neurol 2022; 13:953939. [PMID: 36158971 PMCID: PMC9490093 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.953939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Over the last decade, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has set promise contributing to post-stroke gait rehabilitation. Even so, results are still inconsistent due to low sample size, heterogeneity of samples, and tDCS design differences preventing comparability. Nonetheless, updated knowledge in post-stroke neurophysiology and stimulation technologies opens up opportunities to massively improve treatments. Objective The current systematic review aims to summarize the current state-of-the-art on the effects of tDCS applied to stroke subjects for gait rehabilitation, discuss tDCS strategies factoring individual subject profiles, and highlight new promising strategies. Methods MEDLINE, SCOPUS, CENTRAL, and CINAHL were searched for stroke randomized clinical trials using tDCS for the recovery of gait before 7 February 2022. In order to provide statistical support to the current review, we analyzed the achieved effect sizes and performed statistical comparisons. Results A total of 24 records were finally included in our review, totaling n = 651 subjects. Detailed analyses revealed n = 4 (17%) studies with large effect sizes (≥0.8), n = 6 (25%) studies with medium ones (≥0.5), and n = 6 (25%) studies yielding low effects sizes (≤ 0.2). Statistically significant negative correlations (rho = −0.65, p = 0.04) and differences (p = 0.03) argued in favor of tDCS interventions in the sub-acute phase. Finally, significant differences (p = 0.03) were argued in favor of a bifocal stimulation montage (anodal M1 ipsilesional and cathodal M1 contralesional) with respect to anodal ipsilesional M1. Conclusion Our systematic review highlights the potential of tDCS to contribute to gait recovery following stroke, although also the urgent need to improve current stimulation strategies and subject-customized interventions considering stroke severity, type or time-course, and the use of network-based multifocal stimulation approaches guided by computational biophysical modeling. Systematic review registration PROSPERO: CRD42021256347.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Corominas-Teruel
- Department of Psychology, Neurobehavior and Health Research Group (NEUROLAB), Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain
- Cerebral Dynamics, Plasticity and Rehabilitation Group, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière, CNRS UMR 7225, Paris, France
| | | | - Montserrat Fibla Simó
- Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine Department, Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Maria Teresa Colomina Fosch
- Department of Psychology, Neurobehavior and Health Research Group (NEUROLAB), Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain
- *Correspondence: Antoni Valero-Cabré
| | - Antoni Valero-Cabré
- Cerebral Dynamics, Plasticity and Rehabilitation Group, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière, CNRS UMR 7225, Paris, France
- Cognitive Neuroscience and Information Tech. Research Program, Open University of Catalonia (UOC), Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Laboratory of Cerebral Dynamics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States
- Maria Teresa Colomina Fosch
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Veldema J, Gharabaghi A. Non-invasive brain stimulation for improving gait, balance, and lower limbs motor function in stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2022; 19:84. [PMID: 35922846 PMCID: PMC9351139 DOI: 10.1186/s12984-022-01062-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to summarize and analyze the available evidence of non-invasive brain stimulation/spinal cord stimulation on gait, balance and/or lower limb motor recovery in stroke patients. Methods The PubMed database was searched from its inception through to 31/03/2021 for randomized controlled trials investigating repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial/trans-spinal direct current/alternating current stimulation for improving gait, balance and/or lower limb motor function in stroke patients. Results Overall, 25 appropriate studies (including 657 stroke subjects) were found. The data indicates that non-invasive brain stimulation/spinal cord stimulation is effective in supporting recovery. However, the effects are inhomogeneous across studies: (1) transcranial/trans-spinal direct current/alternating current stimulation induce greater effects than repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, and (2) bilateral application of non-invasive brain stimulation is superior to unilateral stimulation. Conclusions The current evidence encourages further research and suggests that more individualized approaches are necessary for increasing effect sizes in stroke patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jitka Veldema
- Department of Sport Science, Bielefeld University, 33 501, Bielefeld, Germany. .,Institute for Neuromodulation and Neurotechnology, University Hospital and University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
| | - Alireza Gharabaghi
- Institute for Neuromodulation and Neurotechnology, University Hospital and University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ponce GV, Klaus J, Schutter DJLG. A Brief History of Cerebellar Neurostimulation. CEREBELLUM (LONDON, ENGLAND) 2022; 21:715-730. [PMID: 34403075 PMCID: PMC9325826 DOI: 10.1007/s12311-021-01310-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
The first attempts at using electric stimulation to study human brain functions followed the experiments of Luigi Galvani and Giovanni Aldini on animal electricity during the eighteenth century. Since then, the cerebellum has been among the areas that have been studied by invasive and non-invasive forms of electrical and magnetic stimulation. During the nineteenth century, animal experiments were conducted to map the motor-related regions of cerebellar cortex by means of direct electric stimulation. As electric stimulation research on the cerebellum moved into the twentieth century, systematic research of electric cerebellar stimulation led to a better understanding of its effects and mechanism of action. In addition, the clinical potential of cerebellar stimulation in the treatment of motor diseases started to be explored. With the introduction of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation, cerebellar research moved to non-invasive techniques. During the twenty-first century, following on groundbreaking research that linked the cerebellum to non-motor functions, non-invasive techniques have facilitated research into different aspects of cerebellar functioning. The present review provides a brief historical account of cerebellar neurostimulation and discusses current challenges and future direction in this field of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo V Ponce
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jana Klaus
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Dennis J L G Schutter
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bressi F, Cinnera AM, Morone G, Campagnola B, Cricenti L, Santacaterina F, Miccinilli S, Zollo L, Paolucci S, Di Lazzaro V, Sterzi S, Bravi M. Combining Robot-Assisted Gait Training and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review. Front Neurol 2022; 13:795788. [PMID: 35585844 PMCID: PMC9108455 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.795788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Gait impairment is one of the most common disorders of patients with chronic stroke, which hugely affects the ability to carry out the activities of daily living and the quality of life. Recently, traditional rehabilitation techniques have been associated with non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques, which enhance brain plasticity, with the aim of promoting recovery in patients with chronic stroke. NIBS effectiveness in improving gait parameters in patients with chronic stroke has been in several studies evaluated. Robotic devices are emerging as promising tools for the treatment of stroke-related disabilities by performing repetitive, intensive, and task-specific treatments and have been proved to be effective for the enhancement of motor recovery in patients with chronic stroke. To date, several studies have examined the combination of NIBS with robotic-assisted gait training, but the effectiveness of this approach is not yet well established. The main purpose of this systematic review is to clarify whether the combination of NIBS and robot-assisted gait training may improve walking function in patients with chronic stroke. Our systematic review was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies eligible for review were identified through PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and PEDro from inception to March 15, 2021, and the outcomes considered were gait assessments. Seven studies were included in the qualitative analysis of this systematic review, with a total population of 186 patients with chronic stroke. All studies specified technical characteristics of robotic devices and NIBS used, with high heterogeneity of protocols. Methodological studies have shown a significantly greater improvement in walking capacity recorded with 6MWT. Finally, research studies have highlighted a positive effect on walking recovery by combination of robot-assisted gait training with non-invasive brain stimulation. Furthermore, future studies should identify the best characteristics of the combined therapeutic protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Bressi
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- *Correspondence: Federica Bressi
| | - Alex Martino Cinnera
- Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Morone
- Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Benedetta Campagnola
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Cricenti
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Santacaterina
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Sandra Miccinilli
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Loredana Zollo
- Unit of Advanced Robotics and Human-Centred Technologies, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Paolucci
- Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
- Unity of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, Department of Medicine, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Sterzi
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Bravi
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Asan AS, McIntosh JR, Carmel JB. Targeting Sensory and Motor Integration for Recovery of Movement After CNS Injury. Front Neurosci 2022; 15:791824. [PMID: 35126040 PMCID: PMC8813971 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.791824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The central nervous system (CNS) integrates sensory and motor information to acquire skilled movements, known as sensory-motor integration (SMI). The reciprocal interaction of the sensory and motor systems is a prerequisite for learning and performing skilled movement. Injury to various nodes of the sensorimotor network causes impairment in movement execution and learning. Stimulation methods have been developed to directly recruit the sensorimotor system and modulate neural networks to restore movement after CNS injury. Part 1 reviews the main processes and anatomical interactions responsible for SMI in health. Part 2 details the effects of injury on sites critical for SMI, including the spinal cord, cerebellum, and cerebral cortex. Finally, Part 3 reviews the application of activity-dependent plasticity in ways that specifically target integration of sensory and motor systems. Understanding of each of these components is needed to advance strategies targeting SMI to improve rehabilitation in humans after injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jason B. Carmel
- Departments of Neurology and Orthopedics, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mitsutake T, Imura T, Hori T, Sakamoto M, Tanaka R. Effects of Combining Online Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Gait Training in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Hum Neurosci 2021; 15:782305. [PMID: 34955795 PMCID: PMC8708562 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.782305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: Combining transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive gait training may be effective for gait performance recovery after stroke; however, the timing of stimulation to obtain the best outcomes remains unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to establish evidence for changes in gait performance between online stimulation (tDCS and repetitive gait training simultaneously) and offline stimulation (gait training after tDCS). Methods: We comprehensively searched the electronic databases Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and included studies that combined cases of anodal tDCS with motor-related areas of the lower limbs and gait training. Nine studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review, of which six were included in the meta-analysis. Result: The pooled effect estimate showed that anodal tDCS significantly improved the 10-m walking test (p = 0.04; I 2 = 0%) and 6-min walking test (p = 0.001; I 2 = 0%) in online stimulation compared to sham tDCS. Conclusion: Our findings suggested that simultaneous interventions may effectively improve walking ability. However, we cannot draw definitive conclusions because of the small sample size. More high-quality studies are needed on the effects of online stimulation, including various stimulation parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsubasa Mitsutake
- Department of Physical Therapy, Fukuoka International University of Health and Welfare, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Takeshi Imura
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hiroshima Cosmopolitan University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Tomonari Hori
- Department of Rehabilitation, Fukuyama Rehabilitation Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Maiko Sakamoto
- Education and Research Centre for Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan
| | - Ryo Tanaka
- Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Manto M, Argyropoulos GPD, Bocci T, Celnik PA, Corben LA, Guidetti M, Koch G, Priori A, Rothwell JC, Sadnicka A, Spampinato D, Ugawa Y, Wessel MJ, Ferrucci R. Consensus Paper: Novel Directions and Next Steps of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation of the Cerebellum in Health and Disease. CEREBELLUM (LONDON, ENGLAND) 2021; 21:1092-1122. [PMID: 34813040 DOI: 10.1007/s12311-021-01344-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The cerebellum is involved in multiple closed-loops circuitry which connect the cerebellar modules with the motor cortex, prefrontal, temporal, and parietal cortical areas, and contribute to motor control, cognitive processes, emotional processing, and behavior. Among them, the cerebello-thalamo-cortical pathway represents the anatomical substratum of cerebellum-motor cortex inhibition (CBI). However, the cerebellum is also connected with basal ganglia by disynaptic pathways, and cerebellar involvement in disorders commonly associated with basal ganglia dysfunction (e.g., Parkinson's disease and dystonia) has been suggested. Lately, cerebellar activity has been targeted by non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to indirectly affect and tune dysfunctional circuitry in the brain. Although the results are promising, several questions remain still unsolved. Here, a panel of experts from different specialties (neurophysiology, neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychology) reviews the current results on cerebellar NIBS with the aim to derive the future steps and directions needed. We discuss the effects of TMS in the field of cerebellar neurophysiology, the potentials of cerebellar tDCS, the role of animal models in cerebellar NIBS applications, and the possible application of cerebellar NIBS in motor learning, stroke recovery, speech and language functions, neuropsychiatric and movement disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Manto
- Service de Neurologie, CHU-Charleroi, 6000, Charleroi, Belgium.,Service Des Neurosciences, UMons, 7000, Mons, Belgium
| | - Georgios P D Argyropoulos
- Division of Psychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK
| | - Tommaso Bocci
- Aldo Ravelli Research Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Neurotherapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20142, Milan, Italy.,ASST Santi Paolo E Carlo, Via di Rudinì, 8, 20142, Milan, Italy
| | - Pablo A Celnik
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Louise A Corben
- Bruce Lefroy Centre for Genetic Health Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville. Victoria, Australia
| | - Matteo Guidetti
- Aldo Ravelli Research Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Neurotherapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20142, Milan, Italy.,Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico Di Milano, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Koch
- Fondazione Santa Lucia IRCCS, via Ardeatina 306, 00179, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Priori
- Aldo Ravelli Research Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Neurotherapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20142, Milan, Italy.,ASST Santi Paolo E Carlo, Via di Rudinì, 8, 20142, Milan, Italy
| | - John C Rothwell
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neuroscience, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Anna Sadnicka
- Motor Control and Movement Disorders Group, St George's University of London, London, UK.,Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Danny Spampinato
- Fondazione Santa Lucia IRCCS, via Ardeatina 306, 00179, Rome, Italy
| | - Yoshikazu Ugawa
- Department of Human Neurophysiology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Maximilian J Wessel
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland.,Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL Valais), Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland
| | - Roberta Ferrucci
- Aldo Ravelli Research Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Neurotherapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20142, Milan, Italy. .,ASST Santi Paolo E Carlo, Via di Rudinì, 8, 20142, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mihara M, Fujimoto H, Hattori N, Otomune H, Kajiyama Y, Konaka K, Watanabe Y, Hiramatsu Y, Sunada Y, Miyai I, Mochizuki H. Effect of Neurofeedback Facilitation on Poststroke Gait and Balance Recovery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurology 2021; 96:e2587-e2598. [PMID: 33879597 PMCID: PMC8205450 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000011989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2019] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that supplementary motor area (SMA) facilitation with functional near-infrared spectroscopy-mediated neurofeedback (fNIRS-NFB) augments poststroke gait and balance recovery, we conducted a 2-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial involving 54 Japanese patients using the 3-meter Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. METHODS Patients with subcortical stroke-induced mild to moderate gait disturbance more than 12 weeks from onset underwent 6 sessions of SMA neurofeedback facilitation during gait- and balance-related motor imagery using fNIRS-NFB. Participants were randomly allocated to intervention (28 patients) or placebo (sham: 26 patients). In the intervention group, the fNIRS signal contained participants' cortical activation information. The primary outcome was TUG improvement 4 weeks postintervention. RESULTS The intervention group showed greater improvement in the TUG test (12.84 ± 15.07 seconds, 95% confidence interval 7.00-18.68) than the sham group (5.51 ± 7.64 seconds, 95% confidence interval 2.43-8.60; group difference 7.33 seconds, 95% CI 0.83-13.83; p = 0.028), even after adjusting for covariates (group × time interaction; F 1.23,61.69 = 4.50, p = 0.030, partial η2 = 0.083). Only the intervention group showed significantly increased imagery-related SMA activation and enhancement of resting-state connectivity between SMA and ventrolateral premotor area. Adverse effects associated with fNIRS-mediated neurofeedback intervention were absent. CONCLUSION SMA facilitation during motor imagery using fNIRS neurofeedback may augment poststroke gait and balance recovery by modulating the SMA and its related network. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class III evidence that for patients with gait disturbance from subcortical stroke, SMA neurofeedback facilitation improves TUG time (UMIN000010723 at UMIN-CTR; umin.ac.jp/english/).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahito Mihara
- From the Department of Neurology (M.M., Y.S.), Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki; Departments of Neurology (M.M., H.O., Y.K., K.K., H.M.) and Radiology (Y.W.), Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita; Neurorehabilitation Research Institute (H.F., Y.H., I.M.), Morinomiya Hospital, Osaka; Division of Clinical Neuroengineering (N.H.), Osaka University Global Center for Medical Engineering and Informatics, Suita; and Department of Rehabilitation (N.H.), Toyama University, Japan.
| | - Hiroaki Fujimoto
- From the Department of Neurology (M.M., Y.S.), Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki; Departments of Neurology (M.M., H.O., Y.K., K.K., H.M.) and Radiology (Y.W.), Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita; Neurorehabilitation Research Institute (H.F., Y.H., I.M.), Morinomiya Hospital, Osaka; Division of Clinical Neuroengineering (N.H.), Osaka University Global Center for Medical Engineering and Informatics, Suita; and Department of Rehabilitation (N.H.), Toyama University, Japan
| | - Noriaki Hattori
- From the Department of Neurology (M.M., Y.S.), Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki; Departments of Neurology (M.M., H.O., Y.K., K.K., H.M.) and Radiology (Y.W.), Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita; Neurorehabilitation Research Institute (H.F., Y.H., I.M.), Morinomiya Hospital, Osaka; Division of Clinical Neuroengineering (N.H.), Osaka University Global Center for Medical Engineering and Informatics, Suita; and Department of Rehabilitation (N.H.), Toyama University, Japan
| | - Hironori Otomune
- From the Department of Neurology (M.M., Y.S.), Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki; Departments of Neurology (M.M., H.O., Y.K., K.K., H.M.) and Radiology (Y.W.), Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita; Neurorehabilitation Research Institute (H.F., Y.H., I.M.), Morinomiya Hospital, Osaka; Division of Clinical Neuroengineering (N.H.), Osaka University Global Center for Medical Engineering and Informatics, Suita; and Department of Rehabilitation (N.H.), Toyama University, Japan
| | - Yuta Kajiyama
- From the Department of Neurology (M.M., Y.S.), Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki; Departments of Neurology (M.M., H.O., Y.K., K.K., H.M.) and Radiology (Y.W.), Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita; Neurorehabilitation Research Institute (H.F., Y.H., I.M.), Morinomiya Hospital, Osaka; Division of Clinical Neuroengineering (N.H.), Osaka University Global Center for Medical Engineering and Informatics, Suita; and Department of Rehabilitation (N.H.), Toyama University, Japan
| | - Kuni Konaka
- From the Department of Neurology (M.M., Y.S.), Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki; Departments of Neurology (M.M., H.O., Y.K., K.K., H.M.) and Radiology (Y.W.), Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita; Neurorehabilitation Research Institute (H.F., Y.H., I.M.), Morinomiya Hospital, Osaka; Division of Clinical Neuroengineering (N.H.), Osaka University Global Center for Medical Engineering and Informatics, Suita; and Department of Rehabilitation (N.H.), Toyama University, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Watanabe
- From the Department of Neurology (M.M., Y.S.), Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki; Departments of Neurology (M.M., H.O., Y.K., K.K., H.M.) and Radiology (Y.W.), Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita; Neurorehabilitation Research Institute (H.F., Y.H., I.M.), Morinomiya Hospital, Osaka; Division of Clinical Neuroengineering (N.H.), Osaka University Global Center for Medical Engineering and Informatics, Suita; and Department of Rehabilitation (N.H.), Toyama University, Japan
| | - Yuichi Hiramatsu
- From the Department of Neurology (M.M., Y.S.), Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki; Departments of Neurology (M.M., H.O., Y.K., K.K., H.M.) and Radiology (Y.W.), Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita; Neurorehabilitation Research Institute (H.F., Y.H., I.M.), Morinomiya Hospital, Osaka; Division of Clinical Neuroengineering (N.H.), Osaka University Global Center for Medical Engineering and Informatics, Suita; and Department of Rehabilitation (N.H.), Toyama University, Japan
| | - Yoshihide Sunada
- From the Department of Neurology (M.M., Y.S.), Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki; Departments of Neurology (M.M., H.O., Y.K., K.K., H.M.) and Radiology (Y.W.), Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita; Neurorehabilitation Research Institute (H.F., Y.H., I.M.), Morinomiya Hospital, Osaka; Division of Clinical Neuroengineering (N.H.), Osaka University Global Center for Medical Engineering and Informatics, Suita; and Department of Rehabilitation (N.H.), Toyama University, Japan
| | - Ichiro Miyai
- From the Department of Neurology (M.M., Y.S.), Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki; Departments of Neurology (M.M., H.O., Y.K., K.K., H.M.) and Radiology (Y.W.), Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita; Neurorehabilitation Research Institute (H.F., Y.H., I.M.), Morinomiya Hospital, Osaka; Division of Clinical Neuroengineering (N.H.), Osaka University Global Center for Medical Engineering and Informatics, Suita; and Department of Rehabilitation (N.H.), Toyama University, Japan
| | - Hideki Mochizuki
- From the Department of Neurology (M.M., Y.S.), Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki; Departments of Neurology (M.M., H.O., Y.K., K.K., H.M.) and Radiology (Y.W.), Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita; Neurorehabilitation Research Institute (H.F., Y.H., I.M.), Morinomiya Hospital, Osaka; Division of Clinical Neuroengineering (N.H.), Osaka University Global Center for Medical Engineering and Informatics, Suita; and Department of Rehabilitation (N.H.), Toyama University, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Billeri L, Naro A. A narrative review on non-invasive stimulation of the cerebellum in neurological diseases. Neurol Sci 2021; 42:2191-2209. [PMID: 33759055 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-021-05187-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The cerebellum plays an important role in motor, cognitive, and affective functions owing to its dense interconnections with basal ganglia and cerebral cortex. This review aimed at summarizing the non-invasive cerebellar stimulation (NICS) approaches used to modulate cerebellar output and treat cerebellar dysfunction in the motor domain. OBSERVATION The utility of NICS in the treatment of cerebellar and non-cerebellar neurological diseases (including Parkinson's disease, dementia, cerebellar ataxia, and stroke) is discussed. NICS induces meaningful clinical effects from repeated sessions alone in both cerebellar and non-cerebellar diseases. However, there are no conclusive data on this issue and several concerns need to be still addressed before NICS could be considered a valuable, standard therapeutic tool. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Even though some challenges must be overcome to adopt NICS in a wider clinical setting, this tool might become a useful strategy to help patients with lesions in the cerebellum and cerebral areas that are connected with the cerebellum whether one could enhance cerebellar activity with the intention of facilitating the cerebellum and the entire, related network, rather than attempting to facilitate a partially damaged cortical region or inhibiting the homologs' contralateral area. The different outcome of each approach would depend on the residual functional reserve of the cerebellum, which is confirmed as a critical element to be probed preliminary in order to define the best patient-tailored NICS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luana Billeri
- IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo, via Palermo, SS113, Ctr. Casazza, 98124, Messina, Italy
| | - Antonino Naro
- IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo, via Palermo, SS113, Ctr. Casazza, 98124, Messina, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Thomas SM, Delanni E, Christophe B, Connolly ES. Systematic review of novel technology-based interventions for ischemic stroke. Neurol Sci 2021; 42:1705-1717. [PMID: 33604762 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-021-05126-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify novel technologies pertinent to the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of ischemic stroke, and recommend the technologies that show the most promise in advancing ischemic stroke care. METHOD A systematic literature search on PubMed and Medscape was performed. Articles were assessed based on pre-determined criteria. Included journal articles were evaluated for specific characteristics and reviewed according to a structured paradigm. A search on www.clinicaltrials.gov was performed to identify pre-clinical ischemic stroke technological interventions. All clinical trial results were included. An additional search on PubMed was conducted to identify studies on robotic neuroendovascular procedures. RESULTS Thirty journal articles and five clinical trials were analyzed. Articles were categorized as follows: six studies pertinent to pre-morbidity and prevention of ischemic stroke, three studies relevant to the diagnosis of ischemic stroke, 16 studies about post-ischemic stroke rehabilitation, and five studies on robotic neuroendovascular interventions. CONCLUSIONS Novel technologies across the spectrum of ischemic stroke care were identified, and the ones that appear to have the most clinical utility are recommended. Future investigation of the feasibility and long-term efficacy of the recommended technologies in clinical settings is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Mulackal Thomas
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 710 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| | - Ellie Delanni
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 710 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Brandon Christophe
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 710 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Edward Sander Connolly
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 710 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Liao LY, Xie YJ, Chen Y, Gao Q. Cerebellar Theta-Burst Stimulation Combined With Physiotherapy in Subacute and Chronic Stroke Patients: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2020; 35:23-32. [PMID: 33166213 DOI: 10.1177/1545968320971735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) has been suggested to improve poststroke rehabilitation. The cerebellum is considered crucial for motor control. However, the effects of cerebellar iTBS with routine physical therapy on balance and motor recovery in subacute and chronic stroke patients have not been explored. OBJECTIVE To measure the short-term effects of cerebellar iTBS with physiotherapy on the balance and functional outcomes in subacute and chronic stroke patients with hemiparesis. METHODS Thirty hemiparetic patients were recruited for this randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled trial, and randomized into either the treatment or sham group. Both groups participated in physiotherapy 5 times per week for 2 weeks, and cerebellar iTBS or sham iTBS was performed daily, immediately before physiotherapy. The primary outcome was the Berg balance scale (BBS) score. Secondary outcomes included the trunk impairment scale (TIS) score, Fugl-Meyer assessment scale score for lower extremities (FMA-LE), Barthel index (BI), and corticospinal excitability, as measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation. The outcomes were measured before and 1 week and 2 weeks after the intervention. RESULTS Compared with those at baseline, significant increases were identified in all clinical scores (BBS, TIS, FMA-LE, and BI) in both groups after the 2-week intervention. The BBS and TIS scores improved more in the iTBS group than in the sham group. CONCLUSIONS Cerebellar iTBS with physiotherapy promotes balance and motor recovery in poststroke patients. Therefore, this method can be used in low-cost, fast, and efficient protocols for stroke rehabilitation (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR1900026450).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling-Yi Liao
- West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.,Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.,Key Laboratory of Rehabilitation Medicine in Sichuan Province, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yun-Juan Xie
- West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.,Key Laboratory of Rehabilitation Medicine in Sichuan Province, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yi Chen
- West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.,Key Laboratory of Rehabilitation Medicine in Sichuan Province, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Qiang Gao
- West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.,Key Laboratory of Rehabilitation Medicine in Sichuan Province, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Madhavan S, Cleland BT, Sivaramakrishnan A, Freels S, Lim H, Testai FD, Corcos DM. Cortical priming strategies for gait training after stroke: a controlled, stratified trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2020; 17:111. [PMID: 32799922 PMCID: PMC7429759 DOI: 10.1186/s12984-020-00744-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Stroke survivors experience chronic gait impairments, so rehabilitation has focused on restoring ambulatory capacity. High-intensity speed-based treadmill training (HISTT) is one form of walking rehabilitation that can improve walking, but its effectiveness has not been thoroughly investigated. Additionally, cortical priming with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and movement may enhance HISTT-induced improvements in walking, but there have been no systematic investigations. The objective of this study was to determine if motor priming can augment the effects of HISTT on walking in chronic stroke survivors. Methods Eighty-one chronic stroke survivors participated in a controlled trial with stratification into four groups: 1) control–15 min of rest (n = 20), 2) tDCS–15 min of stimulation-based priming with transcranial direct current stimulation (n = 21), 3) ankle motor tracking (AMT)–15 min of movement-based priming with targeted movements of the ankle and sham tDCS (n = 20), and 4) tDCS+AMT–15 min of concurrent tDCS and AMT (n = 20). Participants performed 12 sessions of HISTT (40 min/day, 3 days/week, 4 weeks). Primary outcome measure was walking speed. Secondary outcome measures included corticomotor excitability (CME). Outcomes were measured at pre, post, and 3-month follow-up assessments. Results HISTT improved walking speed for all groups, which was partially maintained 3 months after training. No significant difference in walking speed was seen between groups. The tDCS+AMT group demonstrated greater changes in CME than other groups. Individuals who demonstrated up-regulation of CME after tDCS increased walking speed more than down-regulators. Conclusions Our results support the effectiveness of HISTT to improve walking; however, motor priming did not lead to additional improvements. Upregulation of CME in the tDCS+AMT group supports a potential role for priming in enhancing neural plasticity. Greater changes in walking were seen in tDCS up-regulators, suggesting that responsiveness to tDCS might play an important role in determining the capacity to respond to priming and HISTT. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03492229. Registered 10 April 2018 – retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03492229.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangeetha Madhavan
- Department of Physical Therapy, Brain Plasticity Lab, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1919 W. Taylor St, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Brice T Cleland
- Department of Physical Therapy, Brain Plasticity Lab, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1919 W. Taylor St, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Anjali Sivaramakrishnan
- Department of Physical Therapy, Brain Plasticity Lab, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1919 W. Taylor St, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Sally Freels
- University of Illinois at Chicago, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Hyosok Lim
- Department of Physical Therapy, Brain Plasticity Lab, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1919 W. Taylor St, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Fernando D Testai
- University of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Daniel M Corcos
- Northwestern University, Physical Therapy & Human Movement Sciences, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bao SC, Khan A, Song R, Kai-yu Tong R. Rewiring the Lesioned Brain: Electrical Stimulation for Post-Stroke Motor Restoration. J Stroke 2020; 22:47-63. [PMID: 32027791 PMCID: PMC7005350 DOI: 10.5853/jos.2019.03027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Revised: 01/03/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Electrical stimulation has been extensively applied in post-stroke motor restoration, but its treatment mechanisms are not fully understood. Stimulation of neuromotor control system at multiple levels manipulates the corresponding neuronal circuits and results in neuroplasticity changes of stroke survivors. This rewires the lesioned brain and advances functional improvement. This review addresses the therapeutic mechanisms of different stimulation modalities, such as noninvasive brain stimulation, peripheral electrical stimulation, and other emerging techniques. The existing applications, the latest progress, and future directions are discussed. The use of electrical stimulation to facilitate post-stroke motor recovery presents great opportunities in terms of targeted intervention and easy applicability. Further technical improvements and clinical studies are required to reveal the neuromodulatory mechanisms and to enhance rehabilitation therapy efficiency in stroke survivors and people with other movement disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shi-chun Bao
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Ahsan Khan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Rong Song
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Raymond Kai-yu Tong
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Morya E, Monte-Silva K, Bikson M, Esmaeilpour Z, Biazoli CE, Fonseca A, Bocci T, Farzan F, Chatterjee R, Hausdorff JM, da Silva Machado DG, Brunoni AR, Mezger E, Moscaleski LA, Pegado R, Sato JR, Caetano MS, Sá KN, Tanaka C, Li LM, Baptista AF, Okano AH. Beyond the target area: an integrative view of tDCS-induced motor cortex modulation in patients and athletes. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2019; 16:141. [PMID: 31730494 PMCID: PMC6858746 DOI: 10.1186/s12984-019-0581-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive technique used to modulate neural tissue. Neuromodulation apparently improves cognitive functions in several neurologic diseases treatment and sports performance. In this study, we present a comprehensive, integrative review of tDCS for motor rehabilitation and motor learning in healthy individuals, athletes and multiple neurologic and neuropsychiatric conditions. We also report on neuromodulation mechanisms, main applications, current knowledge including areas such as language, embodied cognition, functional and social aspects, and future directions. We present the use and perspectives of new developments in tDCS technology, namely high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) which promises to overcome one of the main tDCS limitation (i.e., low focality) and its application for neurological disease, pain relief, and motor learning/rehabilitation. Finally, we provided information regarding the Transcutaneous Spinal Direct Current Stimulation (tsDCS) in clinical applications, Cerebellar tDCS (ctDCS) and its influence on motor learning, and TMS combined with electroencephalography (EEG) as a tool to evaluate tDCS effects on brain function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edgard Morya
- Edmond and Lily Safra International Institute of Neuroscience, Santos Dumont Institute, Macaíba, Rio Grande do Norte Brazil
- Brazilian Institute of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology (BRAINN/CEPID-FAPESP), University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Kátia Monte-Silva
- Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco Brazil
- Núcleo de Assistência e Pesquisa em Neuromodulação (NAPeN), Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC)/Universidade de São Paulo (USP)/Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID)/Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública (EBMSP), Santo André, Brazil
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York of CUNY, New York, NY USA
| | - Zeinab Esmaeilpour
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York of CUNY, New York, NY USA
| | - Claudinei Eduardo Biazoli
- Center of Mathematics, Computing and Cognition (CMCC), Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC), Alameda da Universidade, 3 - Anchieta, Bloco Delta – Sala 257, São Bernardo do Campo, SP CEP 09606-070 Brazil
| | - Andre Fonseca
- Brazilian Institute of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology (BRAINN/CEPID-FAPESP), University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
- Center of Mathematics, Computing and Cognition (CMCC), Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC), Alameda da Universidade, 3 - Anchieta, Bloco Delta – Sala 257, São Bernardo do Campo, SP CEP 09606-070 Brazil
| | - Tommaso Bocci
- Aldo Ravelli Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, International Medical School, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Faranak Farzan
- School of Mechatronic Systems Engineering, Simon Fraser University, Surrey, British Columbia Canada
| | - Raaj Chatterjee
- School of Mechatronic Systems Engineering, Simon Fraser University, Surrey, British Columbia Canada
| | - Jeffrey M. Hausdorff
- Department of Physical Therapy, Sackler Faculty of Medicine and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | | | - Eva Mezger
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Luciane Aparecida Moscaleski
- Brazilian Institute of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology (BRAINN/CEPID-FAPESP), University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
- Center of Mathematics, Computing and Cognition (CMCC), Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC), Alameda da Universidade, 3 - Anchieta, Bloco Delta – Sala 257, São Bernardo do Campo, SP CEP 09606-070 Brazil
| | - Rodrigo Pegado
- Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Science, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Santa Cruz, Rio Grande do Norte Brazil
| | - João Ricardo Sato
- Center of Mathematics, Computing and Cognition (CMCC), Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC), Alameda da Universidade, 3 - Anchieta, Bloco Delta – Sala 257, São Bernardo do Campo, SP CEP 09606-070 Brazil
| | - Marcelo Salvador Caetano
- Center of Mathematics, Computing and Cognition (CMCC), Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC), Alameda da Universidade, 3 - Anchieta, Bloco Delta – Sala 257, São Bernardo do Campo, SP CEP 09606-070 Brazil
| | - Kátia Nunes Sá
- Núcleo de Assistência e Pesquisa em Neuromodulação (NAPeN), Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC)/Universidade de São Paulo (USP)/Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID)/Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública (EBMSP), Santo André, Brazil
- Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública, Salvador, Bahia Brazil
| | - Clarice Tanaka
- Núcleo de Assistência e Pesquisa em Neuromodulação (NAPeN), Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC)/Universidade de São Paulo (USP)/Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID)/Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública (EBMSP), Santo André, Brazil
- Laboratório de Investigações Médicas-54, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo Brazil
| | - Li Min Li
- Brazilian Institute of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology (BRAINN/CEPID-FAPESP), University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Abrahão Fontes Baptista
- Brazilian Institute of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology (BRAINN/CEPID-FAPESP), University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
- Núcleo de Assistência e Pesquisa em Neuromodulação (NAPeN), Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC)/Universidade de São Paulo (USP)/Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID)/Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública (EBMSP), Santo André, Brazil
- Center of Mathematics, Computing and Cognition (CMCC), Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC), Alameda da Universidade, 3 - Anchieta, Bloco Delta – Sala 257, São Bernardo do Campo, SP CEP 09606-070 Brazil
- Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública, Salvador, Bahia Brazil
- Laboratório de Investigações Médicas-54, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo Brazil
| | - Alexandre Hideki Okano
- Brazilian Institute of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology (BRAINN/CEPID-FAPESP), University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
- Núcleo de Assistência e Pesquisa em Neuromodulação (NAPeN), Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC)/Universidade de São Paulo (USP)/Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID)/Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública (EBMSP), Santo André, Brazil
- Center of Mathematics, Computing and Cognition (CMCC), Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC), Alameda da Universidade, 3 - Anchieta, Bloco Delta – Sala 257, São Bernardo do Campo, SP CEP 09606-070 Brazil
- Graduate Program in Physical Education. State University of Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Picelli A, Brugnera A, Filippetti M, Mattiuz N, Chemello E, Modenese A, Gandolfi M, Waldner A, Saltuari L, Smania N. Effects of two different protocols of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation combined with transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation on robot-assisted gait training in patients with chronic supratentorial stroke: A single blind, randomized controlled trial. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2019; 37:97-107. [PMID: 30958319 DOI: 10.3233/rnn-180895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The neural organization of locomotion involves motor patterns generated by spinal interneuronal networks and supraspinal structures, which are approachable by noninvasive stimulation techniques. Recent evidences supported the hypothesis that transcranial direct current stimulation (combined with transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation) may actually enhance the effects of robot-assisted gait training in chronic stroke patients. The cerebellum has many connections to interact with neocortical areas and may provide some peculiar plasticity mechanisms. So, it has been proposed as "non-lesioned entry" to the motor or cognitive system for the application of noninvasive stimulation techniques in patients with supratentorial stroke. OBJECTIVE To compare the effects of two different protocols of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation combined with transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation on robotic gait training in patients with chronic supratentorial stroke. METHODS Forty patients with chronic supratentorial stroke were randomly assigned into two groups. All patients received ten, 20-minute robotic gait training sessions, five days a week, for two consecutive weeks. Group 1 underwent cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the contralesional cerebellar hemisphere + cathodal transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation in combination with robotic training. Group 2 underwent cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the ipsilesional cerebellar hemisphere + cathodal transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation in combination with robotic training. The primary outcome was the 6-minute walk test performed before, after, and at follow-up at 2 and 4 weeks post-treatment. RESULTS No significant difference in the 6-minute walk test between groups was found at the first post-treatment evaluation (P = 0.976), as well as at the 2-week (P = 0.178) and the 4-week (P = 0.069) follow-up evaluations. Both groups showed significant within-group improvements in the 6-minute walk test at all time points.∥Conclusions: Our findings support the hypothesis that cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the contralesional or ipsilesional cerebellar hemisphere in combination with cathodal transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation may lead to similar effects on robotic gait training in chronic supratentorial stroke patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Picelli
- Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Center, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Neurorehabilitation Unit, Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Annalisa Brugnera
- Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Center, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Italy
| | - Mirko Filippetti
- Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Center, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Italy
| | - Nicola Mattiuz
- Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Center, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Italy
| | - Elena Chemello
- Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Center, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Italy
| | - Angela Modenese
- Department of Neurosciences, Neurorehabilitation Unit, Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marialuisa Gandolfi
- Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Center, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Neurorehabilitation Unit, Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Andreas Waldner
- Villa Melitta Rehabilitation Clinic, Bolzano, Italy.,Research Unit for Neurorehabilitation South Tyrol, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Leopold Saltuari
- Research Unit for Neurorehabilitation South Tyrol, Bolzano, Italy.,Department of Neurology, Hochzirl Hospital, Zirl, Austria
| | - Nicola Smania
- Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Center, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Neurorehabilitation Unit, Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|