1
|
Cook D, Pearson J. Musculoskeletal physiotherapists' experiences of using remote consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2024; 72:102930. [PMID: 38552401 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.102930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in the rapid implementation of remote consultations to maintain musculoskeletal physiotherapy services. However, little is known about UK musculoskeletal physiotherapists' experiences of providing services during the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVES To explore musculoskeletal physiotherapists' experiences of using remote consultations in one area of England during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN Qualitative study using hermeneutic phenomenology based on the approach of Gadamer. METHODS Semi-structured interviews with twelve musculoskeletal physiotherapists were conducted online using Microsoft Teams. Data were analysed using frameworks based on the philosophical concepts of Gadamer's hermeneutics. FINDINGS Musculoskeletal physiotherapists' experience of using remote consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic was framed by three concepts: therapeutic relationship, transformational change, and uncertainty. These concepts are underpinned by four main themes capturing their experiences: (1) Disconnection: Difficulties building a rapport and reduced non-verbal communication affected building an effective therapeutic relationship, (2) Necessity: Transformation of services to remote consultations was positive, although technology and connectivity issues had a negative impact, (3) Loss of control: Diagnostic uncertainty, being unprepared, and experience affected physiotherapists' clinical practice, (4) Protection: Peer support and the use of technology facilitated a feeling of protection for physiotherapists. CONCLUSION The findings of this study contribute to a better understanding of musculoskeletal physiotherapists' experience of using remote consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Implications for practice include the need to provide training for all musculoskeletal physiotherapists and undergraduates to enable the effective delivery of remote physiotherapy. Furthermore, digital infrastructure should be optimised to support future delivery of remote musculoskeletal physiotherapy services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren Cook
- School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England, Glenside Campus, Blackberry Hill, Bristol, BS16 1DD, United Kingdom.
| | - Jennifer Pearson
- School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England, Glenside Campus, Blackberry Hill, Bristol, BS16 1DD, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hohenschurz-Schmidt D, Scott W, Park C, Christopoulos G, Vogel S, Draper-Rodi J. [Remote management of musculoskeletal pain : A pragmatic approach to the implementation of video and phone consultations in musculoskeletal practice. German version]. Schmerz 2023; 37:360-371. [PMID: 35834004 PMCID: PMC9281242 DOI: 10.1007/s00482-022-00659-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Remote consultations through phone or video are gaining in importance for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain across a range of health care providers. However, there is a plethora of technical options for practitioners to choose from, and there are various challenges in the adaptation of clinical processes as well as several special considerations regarding regulatory context and patient management. Practitioners are faced with a lack of high-quality peer-reviewed resources to guide the planning and practical implementation of remote consultations. OBJECTIVES This Clinical Update seeks to provide practical guidance for the planning and implementation of remote consultations for the management and treatment of people with musculoskeletal pain. METHODS Recommendations are based on a brief overview of the relevant research regarding phone and video consultations for musculoskeletal practice and derived from the literature, relevant guidelines, and practical experience. RESULTS The technical feasibility of remote consultations for musculoskeletal complaints is good, patient satisfaction is high, and a growing body of evidence supports its comparative effectiveness to in-person consultations in some circumstances for improving pain and functioning. We consider in detail practical aspects such as the choosing of hardware and software, we touch on the legal and regulatory context, and we focus on the adaptation of clinical processes and communication. CONCLUSION This Clinical Update draws together best-practice evidence in a practically applicable format, enabling therapists who are working with people with pain to directly apply this knowledge to their individual clinical settings and the requirements of their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Hohenschurz-Schmidt
- Department, Surgery and Cancer, Pain Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, Imperial College London, 4th Floor, 369 Fulham Road, SW10 9NH, London, Großbritannien.
| | - Whitney Scott
- Psychology Department, Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, Großbritannien
- INPUT Pain Management Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, Großbritannien
| | - Charlie Park
- IPRS Triage and Remote Management Team, IPRS Health Limited, Little Blakenham, Suffolk, Großbritannien
| | - Georgios Christopoulos
- First Contact Practitioner, MSc Neuromusculoskeletal Care, BSc (Hons) Physiotherapy, HCPC CSP, Staffordshire, Großbritannien
| | - Steven Vogel
- Research Centre, University College of Osteopathy, London, Großbritannien
| | - Jerry Draper-Rodi
- Research Centre, University College of Osteopathy, London, Großbritannien
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gallotti M, Campagnola B, Cocchieri A, Mourad F, Heick JD, Maselli F. Effectiveness and Consequences of Direct Access in Physiotherapy: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5832. [PMID: 37762773 PMCID: PMC10531538 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12185832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background. Direct access in physiotherapy (DAPT) occurs when a patient has the ability to self-refer to physical therapy without physician referral. This model of care in musculoskeletal diseases (MSDs) has shown better outcomes than the traditional-based medical model of care that requires physician referral to access physiotherapist services. This traditional physician referral often results in a delay in care. Unfortunately, DAPT is still not permitted in many countries. Objectives. The primary objective of this systematic review was to compare the effectiveness, safety, and the accuracy of DAPT compared to the physician-led model of care for the management of patients with musculoskeletal disorders. The secondary objective of the present study is to define the physiotherapists' characteristics or qualifications involved in DAPT. Materials and methods. Databases searched included: Medline, Scopus and Web of Science. Databases were searched from their inception to July 2022. Research strings were developed according to the PICO model of clinical questions (patient, intervention, comparison, and outcome). Free terms or synonyms (e.g., physical therapy; primary health care; direct access; musculoskeletal disease; cost-effectiveness) and when possible MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) terms were used and combined with Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT). Risk of bias assessment was carried out through Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (ROB-2) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) for observational studies. Authors conducted a qualitative analysis of the results through narrative analysis and narrative synthesis. The narrative analysis was provided for an extraction of the key concepts and common meanings of the different studies, while the summary narrative provided a textual combination of data. In addition, a quantitative analysis was conducted comparing the analysis of the mean and differences between the means. Results. Twenty-eight articles met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Results show that DAPT had a high referral accuracy and a reduction in the rate of return visits. The medical model had a higher use of imaging, drugs, and referral to another specialist. DAPT was found to be more cost-effective than the medical model. DAPT resulted in better work-related outcomes and was superior when considering patient satisfaction. There were no adverse events noted in any of the studies. In regard to health outcomes, there was no difference between models. ROB-2 shows an intermediate risk of bias risk for the RCTs with an average of 6/9 points for the NOS scale for observational studies. Conclusion. DAPT is a safe, less expensive, reliable triage and management model of care that results in higher levels of satisfaction for patients compared to the traditional medical model. Prospero Registration Number: CRD42022349261.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Gallotti
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome Campus, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Benedetta Campagnola
- University Hospital Foundation Campus Bio-Medico, Rome University, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Firas Mourad
- Department of Physiotherapy, LUNEX International University of Health, Exercise and Sports, 4671 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
- Luxembourg Health & Sport Sciences Research Institute A.s.b.l., 50, Avenue du Parc des Sports, 4671 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - John D. Heick
- Department of Physical Therapy, Northern Arizona University, P.O. Box 15105, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA
| | - Filippo Maselli
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Baroni MP, Jacob MFA, Rios WR, Fandim JV, Fernandes LG, Chaves PI, Fioratti I, Saragiotto BT. The state of the art in telerehabilitation for musculoskeletal conditions. Arch Physiother 2023; 13:1. [PMID: 36597130 PMCID: PMC9810517 DOI: 10.1186/s40945-022-00155-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given the rapid advances in communication technology and the need that emerged from the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth initiatives have been widely used worldwide. This masterclass aims to provide an overview of telerehabilitation for musculoskeletal conditions, synthesizing the different terminologies used to describe telehealth and telerehabilitation, its effectiveness and how to use it in clinical practice, barriers and facilitators for the implementation in health services, and discuss the need of a curriculum education for the near future. MAIN BODY Telerehabilitation refers to the use of information and communication technologies provided by any healthcare professionals for rehabilitation services. Telerehabilitation is a safe and effective option in the management of musculoskeletal conditions in different models of delivery. There are many technologies, with different costs and benefits, synchronous and asynchronous, that can be used for telerehabilitation: telephone, email, mobile health, messaging, web-based systems and videoconferences applications. To ensure a better practice of telerehabilitation, the clinician should certify safety and access, and appropriateness of environment, communication, technology, assessment, and therapeutic prescription. Despite the positive effect of telerehabilitation in musculoskeletal disorders, a suboptimal telerehabilitation implementation may have happened due to the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in countries where telehealth was not a reality, and clinicians lacked training and guidance. This emphasizes the need to identify the necessary curriculum content to guide future clinicians in their skills and knowledge for telerehabilitation. There are some challenges and barriers that must be carefully accounted for to contribute to a health service that is inclusive and relevant to health professionals and end users. CONCLUSIONS Telerehabilitation can promote patient engagement in health care and plays an important role in improving health outcomes in patients with musculoskeletal conditions. Digital health technologies can also offer new opportunities to educate patients and facilitate the process of behavior change to a healthy lifestyle. Currently, the main needs in telerehabilitation are the inclusion of it in health curriculums in higher education and the development of cost-effectiveness and implementation trials, especially in low- and middle-income countries where access, investments and digital health literacy are limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina P. Baroni
- grid.412268.b0000 0001 0298 4494Masters and Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo 03071-000 Brazil ,Centre for Pain, Health and Lifestyle, São Paulo São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Maria Fernanda A. Jacob
- grid.412268.b0000 0001 0298 4494Masters and Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo 03071-000 Brazil ,Centre for Pain, Health and Lifestyle, São Paulo São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Wesley R. Rios
- grid.412268.b0000 0001 0298 4494Masters and Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo 03071-000 Brazil ,Centre for Pain, Health and Lifestyle, São Paulo São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Junior V. Fandim
- grid.412268.b0000 0001 0298 4494Masters and Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo 03071-000 Brazil ,Centre for Pain, Health and Lifestyle, São Paulo São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Lívia G. Fernandes
- grid.412268.b0000 0001 0298 4494Masters and Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo 03071-000 Brazil ,Centre for Pain, Health and Lifestyle, São Paulo São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Pedro I. Chaves
- grid.412268.b0000 0001 0298 4494Masters and Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo 03071-000 Brazil ,Centre for Pain, Health and Lifestyle, São Paulo São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Iuri Fioratti
- grid.412268.b0000 0001 0298 4494Masters and Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo 03071-000 Brazil ,Centre for Pain, Health and Lifestyle, São Paulo São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Bruno T. Saragiotto
- grid.412268.b0000 0001 0298 4494Masters and Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo 03071-000 Brazil ,Centre for Pain, Health and Lifestyle, São Paulo São Paulo, Brazil ,grid.117476.20000 0004 1936 7611Discipline of Physiotherapy, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, NSW 2000 Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Algarni FS, Alshammari MO, Sidimohammad U, Khayat SA, Aljabbary A, Altowaijri AM. Tele-Rehabilitation Service from the Patient's Perspective: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Patient Exp 2022; 9:23743735221130820. [PMID: 36226035 PMCID: PMC9549184 DOI: 10.1177/23743735221130820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to describe patients' perceptions of tele-rehabilitation (TR) and investigate the association between TR-related factors and both the patients' age and type of rehabilitation services. A cross-sectional survey was conducted to obtain data about patients' demographic and medical information, technological familiarity as well as patients' experience and opinions about TR. The 227 patients completing the survey reported a mean ± SD age of 40.7 ± 13.9 years and musculoskeletal disorders as the most common condition treated by TR. The majority of patients expressed satisfaction and confidence with their therapists' ability to assess and treat their problems using TR. Approximately 75.3% of participants stated that therapists demonstrated a strong understanding of their health conditions, while 82% reported that TR entailed a convenient service during COVID-19. The study found associations between age and patient's ability and confidence to use technology as well as a relationship between the type of treatment received and participants' overall opinions. Patients demonstrated acceptance, confidence, and satisfaction with TR during COVID-19. Patient age and treatment type fulfill a major role in patients' perceptions of TR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Saad Algarni
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical
Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,Fahad Saad Algarni, Department of Health
Rehabilitation Sciences at College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud
University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Majed O Alshammari
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, King Saud University Medical
City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Umkalthoum Sidimohammad
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, King Saud University Medical
City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sarah A Khayat
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, King Saud University Medical
City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah Aljabbary
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, King Saud University Medical
City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rennie K, Taylor C, Corriero AC, Chong C, Sewell E, Hadley J, Ardani S. The Current Accuracy, Cost-Effectiveness, and Uses of Musculoskeletal Telehealth and Telerehabilitation Services. Curr Sports Med Rep 2022; 21:247-260. [PMID: 35801726 DOI: 10.1249/jsr.0000000000000974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Musculoskeletal conditions are a major contributor to global morbidity. During the COVID-19 pandemic, clinicians needed to rapidly meet the evolving requirements of their patients, which resulted in an increased adoption of telehealth services. This area needs more research, as there is currently a paucity of studies, and telehealth practices are continuing to advance and evolve. This study subsequently aims to evaluate the ethics, health economics, and accuracy of current musculoskeletal telehealth services. This article combines three original studies; a telehealth accuracy systematic review; a cost-effectiveness scoping review; and a biopsychosocial narrative review. These studies were combined into one article. This article concludes that telehealth services achieve an average agreement with in-person assessments of 62% for the knee and 31% for the shoulder and that telerehabilitation services incur average cost savings per patient of £38.57 but that these savings are primarily a result of a reduced need to travel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Shina Ardani
- Department of Clinical Research, Sina Medical Technology, Manchester, UNITED KINGDOM
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Crawford T, Parsons J, Webber S, Fricke M, Thille P. Strategies to Increase Access to Outpatient Physiotherapy Services: A Scoping Review. Physiother Can 2022; 74:197-207. [PMID: 37323714 PMCID: PMC10262743 DOI: 10.3138/ptc-2020-0119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Revised: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
Purpose: Multiple Canadian jurisdictions have curtailed public funding for outpatient physiotherapy services, impacting access and potentially creating or worsening inequities in access. We sought to identify evaluated organizational strategies that aimed to improve access to physiotherapy services for community-dwelling persons. Method: We used Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review methods, including a systematic search of CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Embase for relevant peer-reviewed texts published in English, French, or German, and we performed a qualitative content analysis of included articles. Results: Fifty-one peer-reviewed articles met inclusion criteria. Most studies of interventions or system changes to improve access took place in the United Kingdom (17), the United States (12), Australia (9), and Canada (8). Twenty-nine studies aimed to improve access for patients with musculoskeletal conditions; only five studies examined interventions to improve equitable access for underserved populations. The most common interventions and system changes studied were expanded physiotherapy roles, direct access, rapid access systems, telerehabilitation, and new community settings. Conclusions: Studies evaluating interventions and health system changes to improve access to physiotherapy services have been limited in focus, and most have neglected to address inequities in access. To improve equitable access to physiotherapy services in Canada, physiotherapy providers in local settings can implement and evaluate transferable patient-centred access strategies, particularly telerehabilitation and primary care integration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tory Crawford
- Department of Physical Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Joanne Parsons
- Department of Physical Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Sandra Webber
- Department of Physical Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Moni Fricke
- Department of Physical Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Patricia Thille
- Department of Physical Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Peat G, Jordan KP, Wilkie R, Corp N, van der Windt DA, Yu D, Narle G, Ali N. Do recommended interventions widen or narrow inequalities in musculoskeletal health? An equity-focussed systematic review of differential effectiveness. J Public Health (Oxf) 2022; 44:e376-e387. [PMID: 35257184 PMCID: PMC9424108 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdac014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background It is unclear whether seven interventions recommended by Public Health England for preventing and managing common musculoskeletal conditions reduce or widen health inequalities in adults with musculoskeletal conditions. Methods We used citation searches of Web of Science (date of ‘parent publication’ for each intervention to April 2021) to identify original research articles reporting subgroup or moderator analyses of intervention effects by social stratifiers defined using the PROGRESS-Plus frameworks. Randomized controlled trials, controlled before-after studies, interrupted time series, systematic reviews presenting subgroup/stratified analyses or meta-regressions, individual participant data meta-analyses and modelling studies were eligible. Two reviewers independently assessed the credibility of effect moderation claims using Instrument to assess the Credibility of Effect Moderation Analyses. A narrative approach to synthesis was used (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019140018). Results Of 1480 potentially relevant studies, seven eligible analyses of single trials and five meta-analyses were included. Among these, we found eight claims of potential differential effectiveness according to social characteristics, but none that were judged to have high credibility. Conclusions In the absence of highly credible evidence of differential effectiveness in different social groups, and given ongoing national implementation, equity concerns may be best served by investing in monitoring and action aimed at ensuring fair access to these interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Peat
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - K P Jordan
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - R Wilkie
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - N Corp
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - D A van der Windt
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - D Yu
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - G Narle
- Public Health England, London, SE1 8UG, UK.,Versus Arthritis, Chesterfield, S41 7TD, UK
| | - N Ali
- Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, Department of Health and Social Care, London, SW1H 0EU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kelly M, Fullen B, Martin D, McMahon S, McVeigh JG. eHealth Interventions to Support Self-Management in People With Musculoskeletal Disorders, "eHealth: It's TIME"-A Scoping Review. Phys Ther 2022; 102:6506314. [PMID: 35079826 PMCID: PMC8994513 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzab307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE eHealth-mediated interventions have been proposed as one option to support self-management in those with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). This scoping review aimed to chart the evidence regarding eHealth modalities, musculoskeletal diagnosis, and outcomes of eHealth-mediated self-management support interventions in persons with MSDs and identify any gaps within the literature. METHODS Six electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews), 7 grey literature sources (eg, OpenGrey), and reference and citation lists of included studies were searched from database inception to July 2020. Published studies of adult participants with a MSD utilizing an eHealth intervention to support self-management were included. Studies were limited to those published in English. Two reviewers independently screened all studies. Data were extracted by 1 reviewer and reviewed by another reviewer. RESULTS After screening 3377 titles and abstracts followed by 176 full texts, 87 studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The majority were published in the last 5 years (n = 48; 55%), with almost one-third originating in the United States (n = 28; 32%). The most common eHealth modality type was internet based (n = 22; 35%), with almost one-half (n = 41; 47%) of the included studies involving participants with widespread musculoskeletal symptoms. The most commonly reported outcomes were related to body functions (ie, pain intensity) (n = 67; 45%), closely followed by activities and participation (ie, function) (n = 65; 44%), with environmental factors (ie, health care utilization) the least commonly reported (n = 17; 20%). CONCLUSIONS There is considerable variation within the eHealth-mediated self-management support intervention literature. Research is needed on the role of eHealth-mediated self-management support interventions across a broad range of MSDs to guide clinical practice. IMPACT This scoping review has identified gaps in the literature relating to specific eHealth modalities, musculoskeletal diagnoses, and health care utilization data, which should guide future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Kelly
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Clinical Therapies, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland,Department of Physiotherapy, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland,Address all correspondence to Marie Kelly at:
| | - Brona Fullen
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Denis Martin
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom,NIHR Applied Research Collaborative, North East and North Cumbria, United Kingdom
| | - Sinéad McMahon
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Joseph G McVeigh
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Clinical Therapies, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Curtis A, Parwaiz H, Winkworth C, Sweeting L, Pallant L, Davoudi K, Smith E, Chin K, Kelsey M, Stevenson A. Remote Clinics During Coronavirus Disease 2019: Lessons for a Sustainable Future. Cureus 2021; 13:e14114. [PMID: 33927925 PMCID: PMC8075762 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.14114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a focus on non-face-to-face (NF2F) orthopedic clinics. In this study, our aim was to establish whether NF2F clinics are sustainable according to the “triple bottom line” framework by taking into account the impact on patients, the planet, and the financial cost. Methodology This retrospective cohort study was carried out at a large district general hospital with 261 patients identified as having undergone face-to-face (F2F) or NF2F orthopedic consultations (April 2020). These patients were contacted by telephone to establish their experience, mode of transport, and preference for future consultations. Data were also collected relating to environmental and financial costs to the patient and the trust. Results The final analysis included 180 (69%) patients: 42% had an F2F consultation and 58% NF2F consultation. There was no significant difference between each group in terms of convenience, ease of communication, subjective patient safety, or overall satisfaction rating (p > 0.05). Overall, 80% of NF2F patients would be happy with virtual consultations in the future. The mean journey distance was 18.6 miles leading to a reduction in total carbon emissions of 563.9 kgCO2e (66%), equating to 2,106 miles in a medium-sized car. The hospital visit carbon cost (heating, lighting, and waste generation) was reduced by 3,967 kgCO2e (58%). The financial cost (petrol and parking) was also reduced by an average of £8.96 per person. Conclusions NF2F consultations are aligned to the National Health Service’s “Long Term Plan”: (i) delivering high patient satisfaction with equivalent outcomes as F2F consultations; (ii) reducing carbon emissions from transportation and hospital running; and (iii) becoming cheaper.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hammad Parwaiz
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, GBR
| | | | - Lauren Sweeting
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, GBR
| | | | - Kaveh Davoudi
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, GBR
| | - Eleanor Smith
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, GBR
| | - Katherine Chin
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, GBR
| | - Megan Kelsey
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, GBR
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Remote management of musculoskeletal pain: a pragmatic approach to the implementation of video and phone consultations in musculoskeletal practice. Pain Rep 2020; 5:e878. [PMID: 33344873 PMCID: PMC7743834 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000000878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Video and phone consultations for musculoskeletal pain are effective, safe, and appreciated by patients. Implementation and execution require special consideration and such guidance is provided. Introduction: Remote consultations through phone or video are gaining in importance for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain across a range of health care providers. However, there is a plethora of technical options for practitioners to choose from, and there are various challenges in the adaptation of clinical processes as well as several special considerations regarding regulatory context and patient management. Practitioners are faced with a lack of high-quality peer-reviewed resources to guide the planning and practical implementation of remote consultations. Objectives: This Clinical Update seeks to provide practical guidance for the planning and implementation of remote consultations for the management and treatment of people with musculoskeletal pain. Methods: Recommendations are based on a brief overview of the relevant research regarding phone and video consultations for musculoskeletal practice and derived from the literature, relevant guidelines, and practical experience. Results: The technical feasibility of remote consultations for musculoskeletal complaints is good, patient satisfaction is high, and a growing body of evidence supports its comparative effectiveness to in-person consultations in some circumstances for improving pain and functioning. We consider in detail practical aspects such as the choosing of hardware and software, we touch on the legal and regulatory context, and we focus on the adaptation of clinical processes and communication. Conclusion: This Clinical Update draws together best-practice evidence in a practically applicable format, enabling therapists who are working with people with pain to directly apply this knowledge to their individual clinical settings and the requirements of their patients.
Collapse
|
12
|
Gilbert AW, Jones J, Jaggi A, May CR. Use of virtual consultations in an orthopaedic rehabilitation setting: how do changes in the work of being a patient influence patient preferences? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e036197. [PMID: 32938591 PMCID: PMC7497523 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To systematically review qualitative studies reporting the use of virtual consultations within an orthopaedic rehabilitation setting and to understand how its use changes the work required of patients. METHODS Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement, we conducted a systematic review of papers to answer the research question 'How do changes in the work of being a patient when using communication technology influence patient preferences?' Electronic databases were searched for studies meeting the inclusion criteria in April 2020. RESULTS The search strategy identified 2057 research articles from the database search. A review of titles and abstracts using the inclusion criteria yielded 21 articles for full-text review. Nine studies were included in the final analysis. Six studies explored real-time video conferencing and three explored telephone consultations. The use of communication technology changes the work required of patients. Such changes will impact on expectations for care, resources required of patients, the environment of receiving care and patient-clinician interactions. This adjustment of the work required of patients who access orthopaedic rehabilitation using communication technology will impact on their experience of receiving care. It is proposed that changes in the work of being a patient will influence preferences for or against the use of communication technology consultations for orthopaedic rehabilitation. CONCLUSION We found that the use of communication technology changes the work of being a patient. The change in work required of patients can be both burdensome (it makes it harder for patients to access their care) and beneficial (it makes it easier for patients to access their care). This change will likely to influence preferences. Keeping the concept of patient work at the heart of pathway redesign is likely to be a key consideration to ensure successful implementation. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42018100896.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony W Gilbert
- Therapies Department, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, Middlesex, UK
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Jeremy Jones
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Anju Jaggi
- Therapies Department, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, Middlesex, UK
| | - Carl R May
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Demont A, Quentin J, Bourmaud A. [Impact of models of care integrating direct access to physiotherapy in primary care and emergency care contexts in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: A narrative review]. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2020; 68:306-313. [PMID: 32893028 DOI: 10.1016/j.respe.2020.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Revised: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 08/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal disorders are increasing in prevalence, principally due to sedentary behaviors. Strong evidence supports an early need for first-line treatment including physiotherapy. New and innovative models in primary and emergency care have been drawn up and put the physiotherapist's skills to work in early and first-line management of patients with musculoskeletal disorders. The objectives of this review were to identify and describe studies assessing models of care integrating direct access to physiotherapy in primary care and in emergency care for patients with musculoskeletal disorders and to provide perspectives on the application of these two models in France. METHODS A literature review was carried out including studies extracted from four scientific databases: PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and PEDro. The selected articles had to address the clinical effectiveness or efficiency of these models for the provision of care in primary or in emergency care. A narrative literature review method was used. The synthesis deals with the qualitative analysis of the included studies. RESULTS Thirty-nine studies were included in this review: 19 on assessment of the direct access to physiotherapy model in primary care and 20 on the direct access to physiotherapy model in emergency departments as concerns patients with musculoskeletal disorders. The studies showed that the different models incorporating direct access to physiotherapy in primary or in emergency care provided better outcomes in terms of quality and access to care while maintaning a similar degree of safety. However, the methodology of the studies included was estimated as being of heterogeneous quality. CONCLUSION The studies dealing with the new models for provision of care integrating direct access to physiotherapy in primary care or emergency care impart two lessons: (1) they are not designed to replace the physician; (2) collaboration between different health professionals aimed at improving patients' access to efficient care is to be encouraged. It would be worthwhile to focus upon dissemination factors that would enhance the efficiency of these innovative models in other countries, as in France.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Demont
- Inserm 1123 ECEVE, faculté de médecine, université Paris-Diderot, Paris, France; École universitaire de kinésithérapie, université d'Orléans, Orléans, France.
| | - J Quentin
- Pôle Saint-Hélier, centre de médecine physique et réadaptation, Rennes, France
| | - A Bourmaud
- Inserm 1123 ECEVE, faculté de médecine, université Paris-Diderot, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Geraghty AWA, Roberts L, Hill J, Foster NE, Yardley L, Hay E, Stuart B, Turner D, Griffiths G, Webley F, Durcan L, Morgan A, Hughes S, Bathers S, Butler-Walley S, Wathall S, Mansell G, Leigh L, Little P. Supporting self-management of low back pain with an internet intervention in primary care: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial of clinical and cost-effectiveness (SupportBack 2). BMJ Open 2020; 10:e040543. [PMID: 32819960 PMCID: PMC7440707 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Self-management and remaining physically active are first-line recommendations for the care of patients with low back pain (LBP). With a lifetime prevalence of up to 85%, novel approaches to support behavioural self-management are needed. Internet interventions may provide accessible support for self-management of LBP in primary care. The aim of this randomised controlled trial is to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the 'SupportBack' internet intervention, with or without physiotherapist telephone support in reducing LBP-related disability in primary care patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A three-parallel arm, multicentre randomised controlled trial will compare three arms: (1) usual primary care for LBP; (2) usual primary care for LBP and an internet intervention; (3) usual primary care for LBP and an internet intervention with additional physiotherapist telephone support. Patients with current LBP and no indicators of serious spinal pathology are identified and invited via general practice list searches and mailouts or opportunistic recruitment following LBP consultations. Participants undergo a secondary screen for possible serious spinal pathology and are then asked to complete baseline measures online after which they are randomised to an intervention arm. Follow-ups occur at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome is physical function (using the Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire) over 12 months (repeated measures design). Secondary outcomes include pain intensity, troublesome days in pain over the last month, pain self-efficacy, catastrophising, kinesophobia, health-related quality of life and cost-related measures for a full health economic analysis. A full mixed-methods process evaluation will be conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This trial has been approved by a National Health Service Research Ethics Committee (REC Ref: 18/SC/0388). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conferences, communication with practices and patient groups. Patient representatives will support the implementation of our full dissemination strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN14736486.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam W A Geraghty
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| | - Lisa Roberts
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton & University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| | - Jonathan Hill
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Nadine E Foster
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Lucy Yardley
- Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Elaine Hay
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Beth Stuart
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| | - David Turner
- Keele Clinical Trials Unit, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Newcastle, UK
| | - Gareth Griffiths
- School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Frances Webley
- School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Lorraine Durcan
- School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Alannah Morgan
- School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Stephanie Hughes
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| | - Sarah Bathers
- Keele Clinical Trials Unit, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
| | | | - Simon Wathall
- Keele Clinical Trials Unit, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Gemma Mansell
- School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Linda Leigh
- Patient and Public Involvement Representative, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Paul Little
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zanoni CT, Galvão F, Maria RM, Zulli R, Ricciardi JB, Cliquet A, Saad STO. Effectiveness of a home-based therapeutic exercise program on lower back pain and functionality in Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) patients. Hematol Transfus Cell Ther 2020; 43:268-279. [PMID: 32680757 PMCID: PMC8446254 DOI: 10.1016/j.htct.2020.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of a home-based therapeutic exercise program on lower back pain and functionality of SCD patients. Setting A Hematology and Transfusion Medicine Center, University of Campinas (HEMOCENTRO-UNICAMP). Methods This was a prospective study, with a three-month follow-up of SCD patients with lower back pain. The lumbar spine functionality was evaluated by questionnaires, trunk flexion and extension analyses by fiber-optic-electrogoniometry and measurements of muscle strength of trunk flexor and extensors. The Intervention Group (IG) comprised 18 volunteers, median age 44y (28–58) and the control group (CG) comprised 15 volunteers, median age 42y (19–58), who did not perform exercises. The protocol consisted of daily home-based exercises with two evaluations: at the beginning and end of a three-month program. In order to compare the groups at baseline, the Fisher´s exact test and Mann–Whitney test were used for categorical and numeric variables, respectively. The Wilcoxon test was used for related samples comparing numeric measures of each group over time with a 5% (p < 0.05) significance level. Results After the intervention, patients demonstrated a significant improvement, according to the Visual-Analog-Scale (VAS; p = 0.01), Rolland Morris Disability questionnaire (RMDQ; p < 0.01) and trunk flexion and extension muscle strength (p < 0.01). No significant differences were found for the Start-Back-Screening-Tool-Brazil (SBST) and in measures of trunk flexion and extension range-of-motion (RoM). Conclusion Results suggest that daily home-based exercises for a three-month period ameliorate pain and improve disability related to lower back pain and muscle strength.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fábio Galvão
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Roberto Zulli
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Alberto Cliquet
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ojha HA, Fritz JM, Malitsky AL, Wu J, Weiner MG, Brandi JA, Rhon DI, Mobo BHP, Fleming KM, Beidleman RR, Wright WG. Comparison of Physical Therapy and Physician Pathways for Employees with Recent Onset Musculoskeletal Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. PM R 2020; 12:1071-1080. [PMID: 32281269 DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.12382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2019] [Revised: 03/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Life expectancy of the U.S. population will continue to rise, increasing the workforce demands in the treatment of musculoskeletal pathologies. With a declining primary care physician workforce, physical therapists (PT) may be in a unique situation to help absorb this demand. OBJECTIVE Our primary objective was to compare physical function between two primary care groups, a "physical therapy-led pathway" versus "physician-led pathway" in the management of recent-onset musculoskeletal pain at 1-month follow-up. Our secondary objectives were to compare other patient-important outcomes between the groups at 1 month and health utilization at 1 month and 1 year. METHODS A pragmatic randomized controlled trial with a 1-year follow-up was conducted, enrolling 150 university employees with recent onset musculoskeletal pain. Participants were randomized at first contact to either a PT-led pathway or physician-led pathway. The primary outcome was change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) ShortForm v1-Physical Function 10a at 1 month; groups were compared with repeated measurement of analysis of variance and chi-square for both primary and secondary outcomes, except for satisfaction score at 1 month, which was cross-sectionally compared by independent two-sample t-test. At 1 year, healthcare utilization was assessed through medical record extraction, and healthcare utilization was converted to total episodic standard cost. Utilization was compared between groups using chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. RESULTS Both groups demonstrated improvement at 1-month follow-up but showed no significant between-group difference in mean PROMIS scores at 1 month (PT-led pathway vs physician-led pathway, 2.04, [95% CI -0.28 to 4.36]; P = .082). At 1 year, there was no difference in healthcare utilization or cost between groups. No harm or misdiagnosis was found, filed, or reported by participants at 1 year. CONCLUSION This study shows equivalence in outcomes for two low-cost musculoskeletal care pathways with no risk of harm. These results reinforce other findings in the literature that support PTs as safe and effective initial providers for individuals with musculoskeletal disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi A Ojha
- Physical Therapy Program, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Julie M Fritz
- College of Health, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Jingwei Wu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mark G Weiner
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, NY, USA
| | - Jason A Brandi
- Moss Rehabilitation Hospital, Physical Therapy, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Daniel I Rhon
- Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Baylor University, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Ben H P Mobo
- Temple University, Temple Employee Health Service, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | - W Geoffrey Wright
- Physical Therapy Program, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cooper K, Alexander L. Components, skills and training for conducting initial telephone consultations in primary care: a scoping review protocol. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 16:1126-1134. [PMID: 29762305 DOI: 10.11124/jbisrir-2017-003527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
REVIEW OBJECTIVE/QUESTION The objective of this scoping review is to examine the characteristics of initial telephone consultations conducted in primary care settings and to map the existing evidence on the components, skills and training recommended for initial telephone consultations in current primary care.This scoping review will be guided by the following questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kay Cooper
- School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK.,The Scottish Centre for Evidence-based, Multi-professional Practice: a Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence
| | - Lyndsay Alexander
- School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK.,The Scottish Centre for Evidence-based, Multi-professional Practice: a Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zoellner JM, Porter KJ, You W, Chow PI, Ritterband LM, Yuhas M, Loyd A, McCormick BA, Brock DJP. Kids SIPsmartER, a cluster randomized controlled trial and multi-level intervention to improve sugar-sweetened beverages behaviors among Appalachian middle-school students: Rationale, design & methods. Contemp Clin Trials 2019; 83:64-80. [PMID: 31233859 PMCID: PMC6713199 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Revised: 06/07/2019] [Accepted: 06/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
The intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) is disproportionately high in Appalachia, including among adolescents whose intake is more than double the national average and more than four times the recommended daily amount. Unfortunately, there is insufficient evidence for effective strategies targeting SSB behaviors among Appalachian youth in real-world settings, including rural schools. Kids SIPsmartER is a 6-month, school-based, behavior and health literacy program aimed at improving SSB behaviors among middle school students. The program also integrates a two-way short message service (SMS) strategy to engage caregivers in SSB role modeling and supporting home SSB environment changes. Kids SIPsmartER is grounded by the Theory of Planned Behavior and health literacy, media literacy, numeracy, and public health literacy concepts. Guided by the RE-AIM framework (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance), this type 1 hybrid design and cluster randomized controlled trial targets 12 Appalachian middle schools in southwest Virginia. The primary aim evaluates changes in SSB behaviors at 7-months among 7th grade students at schools receiving Kids SIPsmartER, as compared to control schools. Secondary outcomes include other changes in students (e.g., BMI, quality of life, theory-related variables) and caregivers (e.g., SSB behaviors, home SSB environment), and 19-month maintenance of these outcomes. Reach is assessed, along with mixed-methods strategies (e.g., interviews, surveys, observation) to determine how teachers implement Kids SIPsmartER and the potential for institutionalization within schools. This paper discusses the rationale for implementing and evaluating a type 1 hybrid design and multi-level intervention addressing pervasive SSB behaviors in Appalachia. Clincialtrials.gov: NCT03740113.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie M Zoellner
- University of Virginia, Department of Public Health Sciences, UVA Cancer Center Research and Outreach Office, 16 East Main Street, Christiansburg, VA 24073, USA.
| | - Kathleen J Porter
- University of Virginia, Department of Public Health Sciences, UVA Cancer Center Research and Outreach Office, 16 East Main Street, Christiansburg, VA 24073, USA
| | - Wen You
- Virginia Tech, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 321A Hutcheson Hall, 24060, USA
| | - Phillip I Chow
- University of Virginia, Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, 560 Ray C Hunt Drive, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA
| | - Lee M Ritterband
- University of Virginia, Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, 560 Ray C Hunt Drive, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA
| | - Maryam Yuhas
- University of Virginia, Department of Public Health Sciences, UVA Cancer Center Research and Outreach Office, 16 East Main Street, Christiansburg, VA 24073, USA
| | - Annie Loyd
- University of Virginia, Department of Public Health Sciences, UVA Cancer Center Research and Outreach Office, 16 East Main Street, Christiansburg, VA 24073, USA
| | - Brittany A McCormick
- University of Virginia, Department of Public Health Sciences, UVA Cancer Center Research and Outreach Office, 16 East Main Street, Christiansburg, VA 24073, USA
| | - Donna-Jean P Brock
- University of Virginia, Department of Public Health Sciences, UVA Cancer Center Research and Outreach Office, 16 East Main Street, Christiansburg, VA 24073, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Conducting initial telephone consultations in primary care: a scoping review. INT J EVID-BASED HEA 2019; 17 Suppl 1:S38-S40. [PMID: 31283579 DOI: 10.1097/xeb.0000000000000179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Telephone consultations are increasingly used in primary care to deliver healthcare services to patients. However, there has been no review produced which identifies and maps the elements of the components, skills and training required for delivering telephone consultations in primary care. This review maps the evidence and can be used to inform clinical service and staff development. METHOD A scoping review was conducted using Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Inclusion criteria for this review included: Participants - any study focusing on any qualified healthcare practitioner working within primary care services; Concept - was any initial telephone consultation within primary care; Context - was primary care within developed nations defined as having very high human development. A three-step search strategy was adopted to include published and unpublished literature in English from 2002 to 2017. RESULTS The search identified 3378 sources of literature. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts then full text against the inclusion criteria, which resulted in 18 articles included in this scoping review. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers relevant to the review question: components, skills and training in telephone consultations. The 18 articles involved five countries, 144 healthcare professionals and between 55 and 1506 patients. The key attributes for telephone consultations (components, skills and training) were synthesized into tabular display and provide guidance on the main elements required for providing this service in primary care.
Collapse
|
20
|
Lawford BJ, Delany C, Bennell KL, Hinman RS. “I Was Really Pleasantly Surprised”: Firsthand Experience and Shifts in Physical Therapist Perceptions of Telephone‐Delivered Exercise Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis–A Qualitative Study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2019; 71:545-557. [DOI: 10.1002/acr.23618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2018] [Accepted: 06/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
21
|
Bachelet VC, Goyenechea M, Carrasco VA. Policy strategies to reduce waiting times for elective surgery: A scoping review and evidence synthesis. Int J Health Plann Manage 2019; 34:e995-e1015. [PMID: 30793372 DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2019] [Revised: 01/14/2019] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this evidence-based review is to identify and describe the interventions that have been implemented to reduce waiting times for major elective surgery. METHODS Scoping review and presentation of the results according to the SUPPORT tools. We searched MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, SciELO, DARE-HTA, and Google Scholar. The inclusion criteria for research design were comprehensive. RESULTS We identified 5200 records. After eliminating duplicates and screening by title and abstract, 171 records remained for full-text assessment, of which 12 were ultimately included for this review because they reported specific interventions and 96 records were included for further reference. The included studies show significant variability regarding elective procedures, population, and type of provider, as well as in the characteristics of the interventions and the settings. All the studies had methodological limitations. We graded the certainty of the evidence as very low. CONCLUSIONS According to the evidence found for this review, interventions most likely should be multidimensional, with prioritization strategies on the waiting lists to incorporate equity criteria, together with quality management improvements of the surgical pathways and the use of operating rooms, as well as improvements in the planning of the surgical schedule.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivienne C Bachelet
- Escuela de Medicina, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile.,Medwave Estudios Limitada, Santiago, Chile
| | | | - Víctor A Carrasco
- Escuela de Medicina, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile.,Medwave Estudios Limitada, Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Stochkendahl MJ, Nim CG, Boyle E, Larsen OK, Axén I, Kvammen OC, Myburgh C. Managing sickness absence of patients with musculoskeletal pain - a cross-sectional survey of Scandinavian chiropractors. Chiropr Man Therap 2019; 27:1. [PMID: 30651973 PMCID: PMC6329073 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-018-0230-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 12/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Musculoskeletal pain is a major cause of work disability. Many patients with musculoskeletal pain seek care from health care providers other than their general practitioners, including a range of musculoskeletal practitioners. Therefore, these musculoskeletal practitioners may play a key role by engaging in sickness absence management and work disability prevention. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of musculoskeletal practitioners’ practice behaviours, and their perceptions and beliefs about sickness absence management by using Scandinavian chiropractors as an example, as well as to examine the association between these characteristics and two different practice behaviours. Methods As part of a mixed-methods study, we surveyed members of the national chiropractic associations in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden in 2016. Descriptive statistics were used to describe prevalence. Multilevel logistic regression with backwards stepping was used to estimate odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals between each of the two practice behaviours and the characteristics. Results Out of the 802 respondents (response rate 56%), 372 were Danish, 349 Norwegian, and 81 Swedish. In Denmark and Norway, 38.7 and 37.8% always/often considered if sick leave was appropriate for their patient compared to 21.0% in Sweden (p = 0.007); and 86.5% of the Norwegian chiropractors always/often recommended to return-to-work versus 64.5 and 66.7% in Denmark and Sweden respectively (p < 0.001). In the final models, factors associated with the two practice behaviours were age, level of clinical experience, working as a teacher, the tendency to be updated on current legislations and policies using social services, contact with general practitioners, relevance of engagement in SAM, consideration of workplace factors, SAM as part of the clinical tool box, patient out-of-pocket fee, and recommending fast return-to-work. Conclusions Whilst not always engaged in sickness absence management with regards to musculoskeletal pain, chiropractors favour a ‘return-to-work’ rather than a ‘stay-at-home’ approach. Several practice behaviours and perceptions and beliefs are associated with these outcomes; however, system or organisational barriers are linked to clinician non-engagement. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12998-018-0230-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mette Jensen Stochkendahl
- 1Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark.,2Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
| | - Casper Glissmann Nim
- 2Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
| | - Eleanor Boyle
- 2Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
| | - Ole Kristoffer Larsen
- 2Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark.,Private practice, Trimveien 41B, N-3188 Horten, Norway
| | - Iben Axén
- 4Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 13, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ole Christian Kvammen
- Private practice, Aagards plass 5, 3211 Sandefjord, Norway.,6Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166, Frederik Holsts hus, 0450 Oslo, Norway
| | - Corrie Myburgh
- 2Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hay E, Dziedzic K, Foster N, Peat G, van der Windt D, Bartlam B, Blagojevic-Bucknall M, Edwards J, Healey E, Holden M, Hughes R, Jinks C, Jordan K, Jowett S, Lewis M, Mallen C, Morden A, Nicholls E, Ong BN, Porcheret M, Wulff J, Kigozi J, Oppong R, Paskins Z, Croft P. Optimal primary care management of clinical osteoarthritis and joint pain in older people: a mixed-methods programme of systematic reviews, observational and qualitative studies, and randomised controlled trials. PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2018. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar06040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BackgroundOsteoarthritis (OA) is the most common long-term condition managed in UK general practice. However, care is suboptimal despite evidence that primary care and community-based interventions can reduce OA pain and disability.ObjectivesThe overall aim was to improve primary care management of OA and the health of patients with OA. Four parallel linked workstreams aimed to (1) develop a health economic decision model for estimating the potential for cost-effective delivery of primary care OA interventions to improve population health, (2) develop and evaluate new health-care models for delivery of core treatments and support for self-management among primary care consulters with OA, and to investigate prioritisation and implementation of OA care among the public, patients, doctors, health-care professionals and NHS trusts, (3) determine the effectiveness of strategies to optimise specific components of core OA treatment using the example of exercise and (4) investigate the effect of interventions to tackle barriers to core OA treatment, using the example of comorbid anxiety and depression in persons with OA.Data sourcesThe North Staffordshire Osteoarthritis Project database, held by Keele University, was the source of data for secondary analyses in workstream 1.MethodsWorkstream 1 used meta-analysis and synthesis of published evidence about effectiveness of primary care treatments, combined with secondary analysis of existing longitudinal population-based cohort data, to identify predictors of poor long-term outcome (prognostic factors) and design a health economic decision model to estimate cost-effectiveness of different hypothetical strategies for implementing optimal primary care for patients with OA. Workstream 2 used mixed methods to (1) develop and test a ‘model OA consultation’ for primary care health-care professionals (qualitative interviews, consensus, training and evaluation) and (2) evaluate the combined effect of a computerised ‘pop-up’ guideline for general practitioners (GPs) in the consultation and implementing the model OA consultation on practice and patient outcomes (parallel group intervention study). Workstream 3 developed and investigated in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) how to optimise the effect of exercise in persons with knee OA by tailoring it to the individual and improving adherence. Workstream 4 developed and investigated in a cluster RCT the extent to which screening patients for comorbid anxiety and depression can improve OA outcomes. Public and patient involvement included proposal development, project steering and analysis. An OA forum involved public, patient, health professional, social care and researcher representatives to debate the results and formulate proposals for wider implementation and dissemination.ResultsThis programme provides evidence (1) that economic modelling can be used in OA to extrapolate findings of cost-effectiveness beyond the short-term outcomes of clinical trials, (2) about ways of implementing support for self-management and models of optimal primary care informed by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommendations, including the beneficial effects of training in a model OA consultation on GP behaviour and of pop-up screens in GP consultations on the quality of prescribing, (3) against adding enhanced interventions to current effective physiotherapy-led exercise for knee OA and (4) against screening for anxiety and depression in patients with musculoskeletal pain as an addition to current best practice for OA.ConclusionsImplementation of evidence-based care for patients with OA is feasible in general practice and has an immediate impact on improving the quality of care delivered to patients. However, improved levels of quality of care, changes to current best practice physiotherapy and successful introduction of psychological screening, as achieved by this programme, did not substantially reduce patients’ pain and disability. This poses important challenges for clinical practice and OA research.LimitationsThe key limitation in this work is the lack of improvement in patient-reported pain and disability despite clear evidence of enhanced delivery of evidence-based care.Future work recommendations(1) New thinking and research is needed into the achievable and desirable long-term goals of care for people with OA, (2) continuing investigation into the resources needed to properly implement clinical guidelines for management of OA as a long-term condition, such as regular monitoring to maintain exercise and physical activity and (3) new research to identify subgroups of patients with OA as a basis for stratified primary care including (i) those with good prognosis who can self-manage with minimal investigation or specialist treatment, (ii) those who will respond to, and benefit from, specific interventions in primary care, such as physiotherapy-led exercise, and (iii) develop research into effective identification and treatment of clinically important anxiety and depression in patients with OA and into the effects of pain management on psychological outcomes in patients with OA.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN06984617, ISRCTN93634563 and ISRCTN40721988.FundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research Programme and will be published in full inProgramme Grants for Applied Research Programme; Vol. 6, No. 4. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine Hay
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Krysia Dziedzic
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Nadine Foster
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - George Peat
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Danielle van der Windt
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Bernadette Bartlam
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Milisa Blagojevic-Bucknall
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - John Edwards
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Emma Healey
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Melanie Holden
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Rhian Hughes
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Clare Jinks
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Kelvin Jordan
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Sue Jowett
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
- Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Martyn Lewis
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Christian Mallen
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Andrew Morden
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Elaine Nicholls
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Bie Nio Ong
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Mark Porcheret
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Jerome Wulff
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Jesse Kigozi
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
- Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Raymond Oppong
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
- Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Zoe Paskins
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Peter Croft
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Changes in health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) dimensions associated with community-based musculoskeletal physiotherapy: a multi-centre analysis. Qual Life Res 2018; 27:2373-2382. [PMID: 29948600 PMCID: PMC6133001 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-018-1883-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To determine the changes in each of the five dimensions of the EuroQol 5-dimension index associated with community-based physiotherapy. Methods Four thousand one hundred and thirty-six patients that received community-based musculoskeletal physiotherapy across five NHS centres completed the EQ-5D on entry into the service and upon discharge. Patients were categorised on symptom location and response to treatment based on their EQ-5D index improving by at least 0.1 (“EQ-5D responders”). For each symptom location, and for responders and non-responders to treatment, the mean (± SD) were calculated for each dimension pre- and post-treatment as well as the size of effect. Results The mobility dimension improved (p < 0.05) in all symptom locations for EQ-5D responders (d = 0.26–1.58) and in ankle, knee, hip and lumbar symptoms for EQ-5D non-responders (d = 0.17–0.45). The self-care dimension improved (p < 0.05) in all symptom locations for EQ-5D responders (d = 0.49–1.16). The usual activities dimension improved (p < 0.05) across all symptom locations for EQ-5D responders (d = 1.00–1.75) and EQ-5D non-responders (d = 0.14–0.60). Despite the pain/discomfort dimension improving (p < 0.05) across all symptom locations for both EQ-5D responders (d = 1.07–1.43) and EQ-5D non-responders (d = 0.29–0.66), the anxiety/depression dimension improved (p < 0.05) from higher starting levels in EQ-5D responders (d = 0.76–1.05) with no change seen for EQ-5D non-responders (d = − 0.16 to 0.06). Conclusions Clinicians should not assume that a patient presenting with pain but expressing high anxiety/depression is unlikely to respond to treatment, as they may show the best HRQoL outcomes. For patients presenting with pain/discomfort and low levels of anxiety/depression, the EQ-5D index is perhaps not a suitable tool for sole use in patient management and service evaluation.
Collapse
|
25
|
"I was really sceptical...But it worked really well": a qualitative study of patient perceptions of telephone-delivered exercise therapy by physiotherapists for people with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2018; 26:741-750. [PMID: 29572130 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.02.909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2017] [Revised: 02/21/2018] [Accepted: 02/28/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Physiotherapists typically prescribe exercise therapy for people with osteoarthritis (OA) via face-to-face consultations. This study aimed to explore peoples' perceptions of exercise therapy delivered by physiotherapists via telephone for their knee OA. DESIGN A qualitative study (based on interpretivist methodology) embedded within a randomised controlled trial. Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with 20 people with knee OA who had received exercise advice and support from one of eight physiotherapists via telephone over 6 months. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed. RESULTS Although people with OA were initially sceptical about receiving exercise therapy via telephone, they described mostly positive experiences, valuing the convenience and accessibility. However, some desired visual contact with the physiotherapist and suggested including video-conferencing calls or an initial in-person clinic visit. Participants valued the sense of undivided focus and attention they received from the physiotherapist and believed that they were able to communicate effectively via telephone. Participants felt confident performing their exercise program without supervision and described benefits including increased muscular strength, improved pain, and ability to perform tasks that they had not been previously able to. CONCLUSIONS People with knee OA held mostly positive perceptions about receiving exercise therapy from a physiotherapist via telephone, suggesting that such a service is broadly acceptable to consumers. Such services were generally not viewed as a substitute for face-to-face physiotherapy care, but rather as a new option that could increase accessibility of physiotherapy services, particularly for follow-up consultations.
Collapse
|
26
|
Stochkendahl MJ, Larsen OK, Nim CG, Axén I, Haraldsson J, Kvammen OC, Myburgh C. Can chiropractors contribute to work disability prevention through sickness absence management for musculoskeletal disorders? - a comparative qualitative case study in the Scandinavian context. Chiropr Man Therap 2018; 26:15. [PMID: 29713458 PMCID: PMC5918554 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-018-0184-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2017] [Accepted: 04/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite extensive publication of clinical guidelines on how to manage musculoskeletal pain and back pain in particular, these efforts have not significantly translated into decreases in work disability due to musculoskeletal pain. Previous studies have indicated a potential for better outcomes by formalized, early referral to allied healthcare providers familiar with occupational health issues. Instances where allied healthcare providers of comparable professional characteristics, but with differing practice parameters, can highlight important social and organisational strategies useful for informing policy and practice. Currently, Norwegian chiropractors have legislated sickness certification rights, whereas their Danish and Swedish counterparts do not. Against the backdrop of legislative variation, we described, compared and contrasted the views and experiences of Scandinavian chiropractors engaging in work disability prevention and sickness absence management. Methods This study was embedded in a two-phased, sequential exploratory mixed-methods design. In a comparative qualitative case study design, we explored the experience of chiropractors regarding sickness absence management drawn from face-to-face, semi-structured interviews. We subsequently coded and thematically restructured their experiences and perceptions. Results Twelve interviews were conducted. Thematically, chiropractors' capacity to support patients in sickness absence management revolved around four key issues: issues of legislation and politics; the rationale for being a sickness absence management partner; whether an integrated sickness absence management pathway existed/could be created; and finally, the barriers to service provision for sickness absence management. Conclusion Allied health providers, in this instance chiropractors, with patient management expertise can fulfil a key role in sickness absence management and by extension work disability prevention when these practices are legislatively supported. In cases where these practices occur informally, however, practitioners face systemic-related issues and professional self-image challenges that tend to hamper them in fulfilling a more integrated role as providers of work disability prevention practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mette Jensen Stochkendahl
- 1Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark.,2Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
| | - Ole Kristoffer Larsen
- 2Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark.,Horten, Norway
| | - Casper Glissmann Nim
- 2Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
| | - Iben Axén
- 4Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Ole Christian Kvammen
- Sandefjord, Norway.,7Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166, Frederik Holsts hus, 0450 Oslo, Norway
| | - Corrie Myburgh
- 2Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Geraghty AWA, Stanford R, Stuart B, Little P, Roberts LC, Foster NE, Hill JC, Hay EM, Turner D, Malakan W, Leigh L, Yardley L. Using an internet intervention to support self-management of low back pain in primary care: findings from a randomised controlled feasibility trial (SupportBack). BMJ Open 2018. [PMID: 29525768 PMCID: PMC5879455 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of an internet intervention for low back pain (LBP) using three arms: (1) usual care, (2) usual care plus an internet intervention or (3) usual care plus an internet intervention with additional physiotherapist telephone support. DESIGN AND SETTING A three-armed randomised controlled feasibility trial conducted in 12 general practices in England. PARTICIPANTS Primary care patients aged over 18 years, with current LBP, access to the internet and without indicators of serious spinal pathology or systemic illness. INTERVENTIONS The 'SupportBack' internet intervention delivers a 6-week, tailored programme, focused on graded goal setting, self-monitoring and provision of tailored feedback to encourage physical activity. Additional physiotherapist telephone support consisted of three brief telephone calls over a 4-week period, to address any concerns and provide reassurance. OUTCOMES The primary outcomes were the feasibility of the trial design including recruitment, adherence and retention at follow-up. Secondary descriptive and exploratory analyses were conducted on clinical outcomes including LBP-related disability at 3 months follow-up. RESULTS Primary outcomes: 87 patients with LBP were recruited (target 60-90) over 6 months, and there were 3 withdrawals. Adherence to the intervention was higher in the physiotherapist-supported arm, compared with the stand-alone internet intervention. Trial physiotherapists adhered to the support protocol. Overall follow-up rate on key clinical outcomes at 3 months follow-up was 84%. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated the feasibility of a future definitive randomised controlled trial to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the SupportBack intervention in primary care patients with LBP. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN31034004; Results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam W A Geraghty
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Rosie Stanford
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Beth Stuart
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Paul Little
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Lisa C Roberts
- Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Nadine E Foster
- Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Jonathan C Hill
- Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Elaine M Hay
- Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - David Turner
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Wansida Malakan
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Linda Leigh
- Patient and Public Involvement Representative, Southampton, UK
| | - Lucy Yardley
- School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mant A, Pape H. A qualitative work-based project exploring general practitioners' views of the Physio Direct telephone service. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERAPY AND REHABILITATION 2018. [DOI: 10.12968/ijtr.2018.25.1.29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Aideen Mant
- Senior specialist physiotherapist, Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Dewsbury and District Hopspital
| | - Hilary Pape
- Admissions tutor for sport rehabilitation, lecturer in sport and physiotherapy, School of Allied Health Professions and Midwifery, University of Bradford
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lawford BJ, Bennell KL, Kasza J, Hinman RS. Physical Therapists' Perceptions of Telephone- and Internet Video-Mediated Service Models for Exercise Management of People With Osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017; 70:398-408. [PMID: 28437566 DOI: 10.1002/acr.23260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2017] [Accepted: 04/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate physical therapists' perceptions of, and willingness to use, telephone- and internet-mediated service models for exercise therapy for people with knee and/or hip osteoarthritis. METHODS This study used an internet-based survey of Australian physical therapists, comprising 3 sections: 1 on demographic information and 2 with 16 positively framed perception statements about delivering exercise via telephone and video over the internet, for people with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. Levels of agreement with each statement were evaluated. Logistic regression models were used to determine therapist characteristics influencing interest in delivering telerehabilitation. RESULTS A total of 217 therapists spanning metropolitan, regional, rural, and remote Australia completed the survey. For telephone-delivered care, there was consensus agreement that it would not violate patient privacy (81% agreed/strongly agreed) and would save patient's time (76%), but there was less than majority agreement for 10 statements. There was consensus agreement that video-delivered care would save a patient's time (82%), be convenient for patients (80%), and not violate patient privacy (75%). Most agreed with all other perception statements about video-delivered care, except for liking no physical contact (14%). Low confidence using internet video technologies, and inexperience with telerehabilitation, were significantly associated with reduced interest in delivering telephone and/or video-based services. CONCLUSION Physical therapists agree that telerehabilitation offers time-saving and privacy advantages for people with osteoarthritis and perceive video-delivered care more favorably than telephone-delivered services. However, most do not like the lack of physical contact with either service model. These findings may inform the implementation of telerehabilitation osteoarthritis services and the training needs of clinicians involved in delivering care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kim L Bennell
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Rana S Hinman
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Caplan N, Robson H, Robson A, Barry G, Wilkes G. Associations between community-based physiotherapy for musculoskeletal injury and health related quality of life (EQ-5D): a multi-centre retrospective analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2017; 15:212. [PMID: 29065895 PMCID: PMC5655980 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-017-0789-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2017] [Accepted: 10/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Community-based musculoskeletal physiotherapy is used to improve function and health related quality of life (HRQoL). The purpose of this retrospective, multi-centre observational study was to determine the association between community-based physiotherapy management for musculoskeletal disorders and changes in HRQoL. Methods Four thousand one hundred twelve patients’ data were included in the study. Patients were included if they received a single period of treatment for a musculoskeletal injury or disorder. Patients were only included if they were being treated for a single morbidity. Patients received standard physiotherapy appropriate to their specific disorder, which could include health education/advice, exercise therapy, manual therapy, taping, soft tissue techniques, electrotherapy and/or acupuncture. Health related quality of life was assessed using the EQ-5D index. Results EQ-5D improved by 0.203 across all patients (d = 1.10). When grouped by anatomical site of symptom, the largest increases in EQ-5D was in foot pain (0.233; d = 1.29) and lumbar pain (0.231; d = 1.13). Improvements in EQ-5D greater than the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) were seen in 68.4% of all patients. The highest proportion of patients with positive responses to treatment were in ankle pain (74.2%) and thoracic pain (73.4%). The hand (40.5%), elbow (34.7%), and hip (33.9%) showed the greatest proportion of patients that did not respond to treatment. Conclusions Community-based musculoskeletal physiotherapy is associated with improved health related quality of life. A randomised controlled trial is needed to determine any causal relationship between community-based physiotherapy and health related quality of life improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick Caplan
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Northumberland Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK.
| | - H Robson
- Connect Health, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - A Robson
- Connect Health, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - G Barry
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Northumberland Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK
| | - G Wilkes
- Connect Health, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Posadzki P, Mastellos N, Ryan R, Gunn LH, Felix LM, Pappas Y, Gagnon M, Julious SA, Xiang L, Oldenburg B, Car J. Automated telephone communication systems for preventive healthcare and management of long-term conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 12:CD009921. [PMID: 27960229 PMCID: PMC6463821 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009921.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Automated telephone communication systems (ATCS) can deliver voice messages and collect health-related information from patients using either their telephone's touch-tone keypad or voice recognition software. ATCS can supplement or replace telephone contact between health professionals and patients. There are four different types of ATCS: unidirectional (one-way, non-interactive voice communication), interactive voice response (IVR) systems, ATCS with additional functions such as access to an expert to request advice (ATCS Plus) and multimodal ATCS, where the calls are delivered as part of a multicomponent intervention. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of ATCS for preventing disease and managing long-term conditions on behavioural change, clinical, process, cognitive, patient-centred and adverse outcomes. SEARCH METHODS We searched 10 electronic databases (the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; MEDLINE; Embase; PsycINFO; CINAHL; Global Health; WHOLIS; LILACS; Web of Science; and ASSIA); three grey literature sources (Dissertation Abstracts, Index to Theses, Australasian Digital Theses); and two trial registries (www.controlled-trials.com; www.clinicaltrials.gov) for papers published between 1980 and June 2015. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised, cluster- and quasi-randomised trials, interrupted time series and controlled before-and-after studies comparing ATCS interventions, with any control or another ATCS type were eligible for inclusion. Studies in all settings, for all consumers/carers, in any preventive healthcare or long term condition management role were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methods to select and extract data and to appraise eligible studies. MAIN RESULTS We included 132 trials (N = 4,669,689). Studies spanned across several clinical areas, assessing many comparisons based on evaluation of different ATCS types and variable comparison groups. Forty-one studies evaluated ATCS for delivering preventive healthcare, 84 for managing long-term conditions, and seven studies for appointment reminders. We downgraded our certainty in the evidence primarily because of the risk of bias for many outcomes. We judged the risk of bias arising from allocation processes to be low for just over half the studies and unclear for the remainder. We considered most studies to be at unclear risk of performance or detection bias due to blinding, while only 16% of studies were at low risk. We generally judged the risk of bias due to missing data and selective outcome reporting to be unclear.For preventive healthcare, ATCS (ATCS Plus, IVR, unidirectional) probably increase immunisation uptake in children (risk ratio (RR) 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18 to 1.32; 5 studies, N = 10,454; moderate certainty) and to a lesser extent in adolescents (RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.11; 2 studies, N = 5725; moderate certainty). The effects of ATCS in adults are unclear (RR 2.18, 95% CI 0.53 to 9.02; 2 studies, N = 1743; very low certainty).For screening, multimodal ATCS increase uptake of screening for breast cancer (RR 2.17, 95% CI 1.55 to 3.04; 2 studies, N = 462; high certainty) and colorectal cancer (CRC) (RR 2.19, 95% CI 1.88 to 2.55; 3 studies, N = 1013; high certainty) versus usual care. It may also increase osteoporosis screening. ATCS Plus interventions probably slightly increase cervical cancer screening (moderate certainty), but effects on osteoporosis screening are uncertain. IVR systems probably increase CRC screening at 6 months (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.25 to 1.48; 2 studies, N = 16,915; moderate certainty) but not at 9 to 12 months, with probably little or no effect of IVR (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.99, 1.11; 2 studies, 2599 participants; moderate certainty) or unidirectional ATCS on breast cancer screening.Appointment reminders delivered through IVR or unidirectional ATCS may improve attendance rates compared with no calls (low certainty). For long-term management, medication or laboratory test adherence provided the most general evidence across conditions (25 studies, data not combined). Multimodal ATCS versus usual care showed conflicting effects (positive and uncertain) on medication adherence. ATCS Plus probably slightly (versus control; moderate certainty) or probably (versus usual care; moderate certainty) improves medication adherence but may have little effect on adherence to tests (versus control). IVR probably slightly improves medication adherence versus control (moderate certainty). Compared with usual care, IVR probably improves test adherence and slightly increases medication adherence up to six months but has little or no effect at longer time points (moderate certainty). Unidirectional ATCS, compared with control, may have little effect or slightly improve medication adherence (low certainty). The evidence suggested little or no consistent effect of any ATCS type on clinical outcomes (blood pressure control, blood lipids, asthma control, therapeutic coverage) related to adherence, but only a small number of studies contributed clinical outcome data.The above results focus on areas with the most general findings across conditions. In condition-specific areas, the effects of ATCS varied, including by the type of ATCS intervention in use.Multimodal ATCS probably decrease both cancer pain and chronic pain as well as depression (moderate certainty), but other ATCS types were less effective. Depending on the type of intervention, ATCS may have small effects on outcomes for physical activity, weight management, alcohol consumption, and diabetes mellitus. ATCS have little or no effect on outcomes related to heart failure, hypertension, mental health or smoking cessation, and there is insufficient evidence to determine their effects for preventing alcohol/substance misuse or managing illicit drug addiction, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, HIV/AIDS, hypercholesterolaemia, obstructive sleep apnoea, spinal cord dysfunction or psychological stress in carers.Only four trials (3%) reported adverse events, and it was unclear whether these were related to the interventions. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS ATCS interventions can change patients' health behaviours, improve clinical outcomes and increase healthcare uptake with positive effects in several important areas including immunisation, screening, appointment attendance, and adherence to medications or tests. The decision to integrate ATCS interventions in routine healthcare delivery should reflect variations in the certainty of the evidence available and the size of effects across different conditions, together with the varied nature of ATCS interventions assessed. Future research should investigate both the content of ATCS interventions and the mode of delivery; users' experiences, particularly with regard to acceptability; and clarify which ATCS types are most effective and cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pawel Posadzki
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological UniversityCentre for Population Health Sciences (CePHaS)3 Fusionopolis Link, #06‐13Nexus@one‐northSingaporeSingapore138543
| | - Nikolaos Mastellos
- Imperial College LondonGlobal eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public HealthSt Dunstans RoadLondonHammersmithUKW6 8RP
| | - Rebecca Ryan
- La Trobe UniversityCentre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public HealthBundooraVICAustralia3086
| | - Laura H Gunn
- Stetson UniversityPublic Health Program421 N Woodland BlvdDeLandFloridaUSA32723
| | - Lambert M Felix
- Edge Hill UniversityFaculty of Health and Social CareSt Helens RoadOrmskirkLancashireUKL39 4QP
| | - Yannis Pappas
- University of BedfordshireInstitute for Health ResearchPark SquareLutonBedfordUKLU1 3JU
| | - Marie‐Pierre Gagnon
- Traumatologie – Urgence – Soins IntensifsCentre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Axe Santé des populations ‐ Pratiques optimales en santé10 Rue de l'Espinay, D6‐727QuébecQCCanadaG1L 3L5
| | - Steven A Julious
- University of SheffieldMedical Statistics Group, School of Health and Related ResearchRegent Court, 30 Regent StreetSheffieldUKS1 4DA
| | - Liming Xiang
- Nanyang Technological UniversityDivision of Mathematical Sciences, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences21 Nanyang LinkSingaporeSingapore
| | - Brian Oldenburg
- University of MelbourneMelbourne School of Population and Global HealthMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Josip Car
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological UniversityCentre for Population Health Sciences (CePHaS)3 Fusionopolis Link, #06‐13Nexus@one‐northSingaporeSingapore138543
- Imperial College LondonGlobal eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public HealthSt Dunstans RoadLondonHammersmithUKW6 8RP
- University of LjubljanaDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of MedicineLjubljanaSlovenia
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Drew CJG, Poile V, Trubey R, Watson G, Kelson M, Townson J, Rosser A, Hood K, Quinn L, Busse M. Integrating technology into complex intervention trial processes: a case study. Trials 2016; 17:551. [PMID: 27855710 PMCID: PMC5114753 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1674-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2016] [Accepted: 10/31/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trials of complex interventions are associated with high costs and burdens in terms of paperwork, management, data collection, validation, and intervention fidelity assessment occurring across multiple sites. Traditional data collection methods rely on paper-based forms, where processing can be time-consuming and error rates high. Electronic source data collection can potentially address many of these inefficiencies, but has not routinely been used in complex intervention trials. Here we present the use of an on-line system for managing all aspects of data handling and for the monitoring of trial processes in a multicentre trial of a complex intervention. We custom built a web-accessible software application for the delivery of ENGAGE-HD, a multicentre trial of a complex physical therapy intervention. The software incorporated functionality for participant randomisation, data collection and assessment of intervention fidelity. It was accessible to multiple users with differing levels of access depending on required usage or to maintain blinding. Each site was supplied with a 4G-enabled iPad for accessing the system. The impact of this system was quantified through review of data quality and collation of feedback from site coordinators and assessors through structured process interviews. RESULTS The custom-built system was an efficient tool for collecting data and managing trial processes. Although the set-up time required was significant, using the system resulted in an overall data completion rate of 98.5% with a data query rate of 0.1%, the majority of which were resolved in under a week. Feedback from research staff indicated that the system was highly acceptable for use in a research environment. This was a reflection of the portability and accessibility of the system when using the iPad and its usefulness in aiding accurate data collection, intervention fidelity and general administration. CONCLUSIONS A combination of commercially available hardware and a bespoke online database designed to support data collection, intervention fidelity and trial progress provides a viable option for streamlining trial processes in a multicentre complex intervention trial. There is scope to further extend the system to cater for larger trials and add further functionality such as automatic reporting facilities and participant management support. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN65378754 , registered on 13 March 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheney J. G. Drew
- South East Wales Trials Unit, Centre For Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, 7th Floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS UK
| | - Vincent Poile
- South East Wales Trials Unit, Centre For Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, 7th Floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS UK
| | - Rob Trubey
- South East Wales Trials Unit, Centre For Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, 7th Floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS UK
| | - Gareth Watson
- South East Wales Trials Unit, Centre For Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, 7th Floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS UK
| | - Mark Kelson
- South East Wales Trials Unit, Centre For Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, 7th Floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS UK
| | - Julia Townson
- South East Wales Trials Unit, Centre For Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, 7th Floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS UK
| | - Anne Rosser
- School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Biosciences 3, Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3BB UK
| | - Kerenza Hood
- South East Wales Trials Unit, Centre For Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, 7th Floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS UK
| | - Lori Quinn
- Department of Biobehavioral Sciences, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY USA
- School of Health Care Sciences, Cardiff University, 35-43 Eastgate House, Newport Road, Cardiff, CF24 0AB UK
| | - Monica Busse
- South East Wales Trials Unit, Centre For Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, 7th Floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS UK
- School of Health Care Sciences, Cardiff University, 35-43 Eastgate House, Newport Road, Cardiff, CF24 0AB UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hill JC, Afolabi EK, Lewis M, Dunn KM, Roddy E, van der Windt DA, Foster NE. Does a modified STarT Back Tool predict outcome with a broader group of musculoskeletal patients than back pain? A secondary analysis of cohort data. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e012445. [PMID: 27742627 PMCID: PMC5073547 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The STarT Back Tool has good predictive performance for non-specific low back pain in primary care. We therefore aimed to investigate whether a modified STarT Back Tool predicted outcome with a broader group of musculoskeletal patients, and assessed the consequences of using existing risk-group cut-points across different pain regions. SETTING Secondary analysis of prospective data from 2 cohorts: (1) outpatient musculoskeletal physiotherapy services (PhysioDirect trial n=1887) and (2) musculoskeletal primary-secondary care interface services (SAMBA study n=1082). PARTICIPANTS Patients with back, neck, upper limb, lower limb or multisite pain with a completed modified STarT Back Tool (baseline) and 6-month physical health outcome (Short Form 36 (SF-36)). OUTCOMES Area under the receiving operator curve (AUCs) tested discriminative abilities of the tool's baseline score for identifying poor 6-month outcome (SF-36 lower tertile Physical Component Score). Risk-group cut-points were tested using sensitivity and specificity for identifying poor outcome using (1) Youden's J statistic and (2) a clinically determined rule that specificity should not fall below 0.7 (false-positive rate <30%). RESULTS In PhysioDirect and SAMBA, poor 6-month physical health was 18.5% and 28.2%, respectively. Modified STarT Back Tool score AUCs for predicting outcome in back pain were 0.72 and 0.79, neck 0.82 and 0.88, upper limb 0.79 and 0.86, lower limb 0.77 and 0.83, and multisite pain 0.83 and 0.82 in PhysioDirect and SAMBA, respectively. Differences between pain region AUCs were non-significant. Optimal cut-points to discriminate low-risk and medium-risk/high-risk groups depended on pain region and clinical services. CONCLUSIONS A modified STarT Back Tool similarly predicts 6-month physical health outcome across 5 musculoskeletal pain regions. However, the use of consistent risk-group cut-points was not possible and resulted in poor sensitivity (too many with long-term disability being missed) or specificity (too many with good outcome inaccurately classified as 'at risk') for some pain regions. The draft tool is now being refined and validated within a new programme of research for a broader musculoskeletal population. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN55666618; Post results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Hill
- Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - E K Afolabi
- Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - M Lewis
- Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - K M Dunn
- Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - E Roddy
- Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - D A van der Windt
- Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - N E Foster
- Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Walsh N, Jordan JL, Babatunde OO, Powell J, Healey EL. Community-based exercise and physical activity programmes led by exercise professionals for osteoarthritis. Hippokratia 2016. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Walsh
- University of the West of England; Glenside Campus Bristol UK BS16 1DD
| | - Joanne L Jordan
- Keele University; Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care & Health Sciences; Keele Staffordshire UK ST5 5BG
| | - Opeyemi O Babatunde
- Keele University; Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care & Health Sciences; Keele Staffordshire UK ST5 5BG
| | - Jane Powell
- University of the West of England; Faculty of Life Sciences; Bristol UK
| | - Emma L Healey
- Keele University; Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care & Health Sciences; Keele Staffordshire UK ST5 5BG
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Palazzo C, Klinger E, Dorner V, Kadri A, Thierry O, Boumenir Y, Martin W, Poiraudeau S, Ville I. Barriers to home-based exercise program adherence with chronic low back pain: Patient expectations regarding new technologies. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2016; 59:107-13. [PMID: 27050664 DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2016.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2015] [Revised: 01/10/2016] [Accepted: 01/25/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess views of patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP) concerning barriers to home-based exercise program adherence and to record expectations regarding new technologies. DESIGN Qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS A heterogeneous sample of 29 patients who performed a home-based exercise program for cLBP learned during supervised physiotherapy sessions in a tertiary care hospital. INTERVENTIONS Patients were interviewed at home by the same trained interviewer. Interviews combined a funnel-shaped structure and an itinerary method. RESULTS Barriers to adherence related to the exercise program (number, effectiveness, complexity and burden of exercises), the healthcare journey (breakdown between supervised sessions and home exercise, lack of follow-up and difficulties in contacting care providers), patient representations (illness and exercise perception, despondency, depression and lack of motivation), and the environment (attitudes of others, difficulties in planning exercise practice). Adherence could be enhanced by increasing the attractiveness of exercise programs, improving patient performance (following a model or providing feedback), and the feeling of being supported by care providers and other patients. Regarding new technologies, relatively younger patients favored visual and dynamic support that provided an enjoyable and challenging environment and feedback on their performance. Relatively older patients favored the possibility of being guided when doing exercises. Whatever the tool proposed, patients expected its use to be learned during a supervised session and performance regularly checked by care providers; they expected adherence to be discussed with care providers. CONCLUSIONS For patients with cLBP, adherence to home-based exercise programs could be facilitated by increasing the attractiveness of the programs, improving patient performance and favoring a feeling of being supported. New technologies meet these challenges and seem attractive to patients but are not a substitute for the human relationship between patients and care providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clémence Palazzo
- Service de rééducation et réadaptation de l'appareil locomoteur et des pathologies du rachis, hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, Paris, France; U1153, Inserm, université Paris Descartes, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France; Inserm/CNRS, institut fédératif de recherche handicap, Paris, France.
| | - Evelyne Klinger
- Équipe innovations numériques santé handicap - ESIEA, 38, rue des Docteurs-Calmette-et-Guérin, 53000 Laval, France; Inserm/CNRS, institut fédératif de recherche handicap, Paris, France
| | - Véronique Dorner
- Programme handicaps et sociétés, EHESS, Cermes 3, Campus CNRS, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Olivier Thierry
- Programme handicaps et sociétés, EHESS, Cermes 3, Campus CNRS, Villejuif, France
| | - Yasmine Boumenir
- Équipe innovations numériques santé handicap - ESIEA, 38, rue des Docteurs-Calmette-et-Guérin, 53000 Laval, France
| | - William Martin
- Service de rééducation et réadaptation de l'appareil locomoteur et des pathologies du rachis, hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, Paris, France; U1153, Inserm, université Paris Descartes, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France; Inserm/CNRS, institut fédératif de recherche handicap, Paris, France
| | - Serge Poiraudeau
- Service de rééducation et réadaptation de l'appareil locomoteur et des pathologies du rachis, hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, Paris, France; U1153, Inserm, université Paris Descartes, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France; Inserm/CNRS, institut fédératif de recherche handicap, Paris, France
| | - Isabelle Ville
- Programme handicaps et sociétés, EHESS, Cermes 3, Campus CNRS, Villejuif, France; Inserm/CNRS, institut fédératif de recherche handicap, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Pearson J, Richardson J, Calnan M, Salisbury C, Foster NE. The acceptability to patients of PhysioDirect telephone assessment and advice services; a qualitative interview study. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16:104. [PMID: 27020840 PMCID: PMC4810506 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1349-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2015] [Accepted: 03/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In response to long waiting lists and problems with access to primary care physiotherapy, several Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) (now Clinical Commissioning Groups CCGs) developed physiotherapy-led telephone assessment and treatment services. The Medical Research Council (MRC) funded PhysioDirect trial was a randomised control trial (RCT) in four PCTs, with a total of 2252 patients that compared this approach with usual physiotherapy care. This nested qualitative study aimed to explore the acceptability of the PhysioDirect telephone assessment and advice service to patients with musculoskeletal conditions. METHODS We conducted 57 semi-structured interviews with adults from 4 PCTs who were referred from general practice to physiotherapy with musculoskeletal conditions and were participating in the PhysioDirect trial. The Framework method was used to analyse the qualitative data. RESULTS The PhysioDirect service was largely viewed as acceptable although some saw it as a first step to subsequent face-to-face physiotherapy. Most participants found accessing the PhysioDirect service straightforward and smooth, and they valued the faster access to physiotherapy advice offered by the telephone service. Participants generally viewed both the PhysioDirect service and the physiotherapists providing the service as helpful. Participants' preferences and priorities for treatment defined the acceptable features of PhysioDirect but the acceptable features were traded off against less acceptable features. Some participants felt that the PhysioDirect service was impersonal and impaired the development of a good relationship with their physiotherapist, which made the service feel remote and less valuable. CONCLUSION The PhysioDirect service was broadly acceptable to participants since it provided faster access to physiotherapy advice for their musculoskeletal conditions. Participants felt that it is best placed as one method of accessing physiotherapy services, in addition to, rather than as a replacement for, more traditional face-to-face physiotherapy assessment and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Pearson
- />Faculty of Health & Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Glenside Campus, Blackberry Hill, Bristol, BS16 1DD UK
| | - Jane Richardson
- />Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffs ST5 5BG UK
| | - Michael Calnan
- />School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research, University of Kent, Cornwallis North East, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NF UK
| | - Chris Salisbury
- />NIHR School for Primary Care Research, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS UK
| | - Nadine E. Foster
- />Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffs ST5 5BG UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Peckham E, Brabyn S, Cook L, Devlin T, Dumville J, Torgerson DJ. The use of unequal randomisation in clinical trials — An update. Contemp Clin Trials 2015; 45:113-22. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2015] [Revised: 05/21/2015] [Accepted: 05/25/2015] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|
38
|
Portela MC, Pronovost PJ, Woodcock T, Carter P, Dixon-Woods M. How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types. Postgrad Med J 2015; 91:343-54. [PMID: 26045562 PMCID: PMC4484358 DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-003620rep] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Improvement (defined broadly as purposive efforts to secure positive change) has become an increasingly important activity and field of inquiry within healthcare. This article offers an overview of possible methods for the study of improvement interventions. The choice of available designs is wide, but debates continue about how far improvement efforts can be simultaneously practical (aimed at producing change) and scientific (aimed at producing new knowledge), and whether the distinction between the practical and the scientific is a real and useful one. Quality improvement projects tend to be applied and, in some senses, self-evaluating. They are not necessarily directed at generating new knowledge, but reports of such projects if well conducted and cautious in their inferences may be of considerable value. They can be distinguished heuristically from research studies, which are motivated by and set out explicitly to test a hypothesis, or otherwise generate new knowledge, and from formal evaluations of improvement projects. We discuss variants of trial designs, quasi-experimental designs, systematic reviews, programme evaluations, process evaluations, qualitative studies, and economic evaluations. We note that designs that are better suited to the evaluation of clearly defined and static interventions may be adopted without giving sufficient attention to the challenges associated with the dynamic nature of improvement interventions and their interactions with contextual factors. Reconciling pragmatism and research rigour is highly desirable in the study of improvement. Trade-offs need to be made wisely, taking into account the objectives involved and inferences to be made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margareth Crisóstomo Portela
- Social Science Applied to Healthcare Research (SAPPHIRE) Group, Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK Department of Health Administration and Planning, National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Peter J Pronovost
- Departments of Anesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine, and Surgery, Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, School of Medicine, and Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Thomas Woodcock
- NIHR CLAHRC for Northwest London, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
| | - Pam Carter
- Social Science Applied to Healthcare Research (SAPPHIRE) Group, Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Mary Dixon-Woods
- Social Science Applied to Healthcare Research (SAPPHIRE) Group, Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Portela MC, Pronovost PJ, Woodcock T, Carter P, Dixon-Woods M. How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types. BMJ Qual Saf 2015; 24:325-36. [PMID: 25810415 PMCID: PMC4413733 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 176] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2014] [Accepted: 02/16/2015] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Improvement (defined broadly as purposive efforts to secure positive change) has become an increasingly important activity and field of inquiry within healthcare. This article offers an overview of possible methods for the study of improvement interventions. The choice of available designs is wide, but debates continue about how far improvement efforts can be simultaneously practical (aimed at producing change) and scientific (aimed at producing new knowledge), and whether the distinction between the practical and the scientific is a real and useful one. Quality improvement projects tend to be applied and, in some senses, self-evaluating. They are not necessarily directed at generating new knowledge, but reports of such projects if well conducted and cautious in their inferences may be of considerable value. They can be distinguished heuristically from research studies, which are motivated by and set out explicitly to test a hypothesis, or otherwise generate new knowledge, and from formal evaluations of improvement projects. We discuss variants of trial designs, quasi-experimental designs, systematic reviews, programme evaluations, process evaluations, qualitative studies, and economic evaluations. We note that designs that are better suited to the evaluation of clearly defined and static interventions may be adopted without giving sufficient attention to the challenges associated with the dynamic nature of improvement interventions and their interactions with contextual factors. Reconciling pragmatism and research rigour is highly desirable in the study of improvement. Trade-offs need to be made wisely, taking into account the objectives involved and inferences to be made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margareth Crisóstomo Portela
- Social Science Applied to Healthcare Research (SAPPHIRE) Group, Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK Department of Health Administration and Planning, National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Peter J Pronovost
- Departments of Anesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine, and Surgery, Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, School of Medicine, and Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Thomas Woodcock
- NIHR CLAHRC for Northwest London, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
| | - Pam Carter
- Social Science Applied to Healthcare Research (SAPPHIRE) Group, Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Mary Dixon-Woods
- Social Science Applied to Healthcare Research (SAPPHIRE) Group, Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ballini L, Negro A, Maltoni S, Vignatelli L, Flodgren G, Simera I, Holmes J, Grilli R. Interventions to reduce waiting times for elective procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2015:CD005610. [PMID: 25706039 PMCID: PMC10835204 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd005610.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long waiting times for elective healthcare procedures may cause distress among patients, may have adverse health consequences and may be perceived as inappropriate delivery and planning of health care. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing waiting times for elective care, both diagnostic and therapeutic. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following electronic databases: Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (1946-), EMBASE (1947-), the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), ABI Inform, the Canadian Research Index, the Science, Social Sciences and Humanities Citation Indexes, a series of databases via Proquest: Dissertations & Theses (including UK & Ireland), EconLit, PAIS (Public Affairs International), Political Science Collection, Nursing Collection, Sociological Abstracts, Social Services Abstracts and Worldwide Political Science Abstracts. We sought related reviews by searching the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE). We searched trial registries, as well as grey literature sites and reference lists of relevant articles. SELECTION CRITERIA We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs), controlled before-after studies (CBAs) and interrupted time series (ITS) designs that met EPOC minimum criteria and evaluated the effectiveness of any intervention aimed at reducing waiting times for any type of elective procedure. We considered studies reporting one or more of the following outcomes: number or proportion of participants whose waiting times were above or below a specific time threshold, or participants' mean or median waiting times. Comparators could include any type of active intervention or standard practice. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted data from, and assessed risk of bias of, each included study, using a standardised form and the EPOC 'Risk of bias' tool. They classified interventions as follows: interventions aimed at (1) rationing and/or prioritising demand, (2) expanding capacity, or (3) restructuring the intake assessment/referral process.For RCTs when available, we reported preintervention and postintervention values of outcome for intervention and control groups, and we calculated the absolute change from baseline or the effect size with 95% confidence interval (CI). We reanalysed ITS studies that had been inappropriately analysed using segmented time-series regression, and obtained estimates for regression coefficients corresponding to two standardised effect sizes: change in level and change in slope. MAIN RESULTS Eight studies met our inclusion criteria: three RCTs and five ITS studies involving a total of 135 general practices/primary care clinics, seven hospitals and one outpatient clinic. The studies were heterogeneous in terms of types of interventions, elective procedures and clinical conditions; this made meta-analysis unfeasible.One ITS study evaluating prioritisation of demand through a system for streamlining elective surgery services reduced the number of semi-urgent participants waiting longer than the recommended time (< 90 days) by 28 participants/mo, while no effects were found for urgent (< 30 days) versus non-urgent participants (< 365 days).Interventions aimed at restructuring the intake assessment/referral process were evaluated in seven studies. Four studies (two RCTs and two ITSs) evaluated open access, or direct booking/referral: One RCT, which showed that open access to laparoscopic sterilisation reduced waiting times, had very high attrition (87%); the other RCT showed that open access to investigative services reduced waiting times (30%) for participants with lower urinary tract syndrome (LUTS) but had no effect on waiting times for participants with microscopic haematuria. In one ITS study, same-day scheduling for paediatric health clinic appointments reduced waiting times (direct reduction of 25.2 days, and thereafter a decrease of 3.03 days per month), while another ITS study showed no effect of a direct booking system on proportions of participants receiving a colposcopy appointment within the recommended time. One RCT and one ITS showed no effect of distant consultancy (instant photography for dermatological conditions and telemedicine for ear nose throat (ENT) conditions) on waiting times; another ITS study showed no effect of a pooled waiting list on the number of participants waiting for uncomplicated spinal surgery.Overall quality of the evidence for all outcomes, assessed using the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) tool, ranged from low to very low.We found no studies evaluating interventions to increase capacity or to ration demand. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS As only a handful of low-quality studies are presently available, we cannot draw any firm conclusions about the effectiveness of the evaluated interventions in reducing waiting times. However, interventions involving the provision of more accessible services (open access or direct booking/referral) show some promise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luciana Ballini
- Osservatorio Regionale per l'Innovazione, Agenzia Sanitaria e Sociale Regionale - Regione Emilia-Romagna, viale Aldo Moro 21, Bologna, Italy, 40127.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Agostini M, Moja L, Banzi R, Pistotti V, Tonin P, Venneri A, Turolla A. Telerehabilitation and recovery of motor function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare 2015; 21:202-13. [PMID: 25712109 DOI: 10.1177/1357633x15572201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 157] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2014] [Accepted: 11/15/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Recent advances in telecommunication technologies have boosted the possibility to deliver rehabilitation via the internet (i.e. telerehabilitation). Several studies have shown that telerehabilitation is effective to improve clinical outcomes in disabling conditions. The aim of this review was to determine whether telerehabilitation was more effective than other modes of delivering rehabilitation to regain motor function, in different populations of patients.We searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library retrieving 2360 records. Twelve studies were included involving different populations (i.e. neurological, total knee arthroplasty (TKA), cardiac) of patients. Inconclusive finding were found on the effect of telerehabilitation for neurological patients (SMD = 0.08, CI 95% = -0.13, 0.29), while both for cardiac (SMD = 0.24, CI 95% = 0.04, 0.43) and TKA patients (Timed Up and Go test: MD = -5.17, CI 95% = -9.79, -0.55) the results were in favour of telerehabilitation.Conclusive evidence on the efficacy of telerehabilitation for treatment of motor function, regardless of pathology, was not reached. Nevertheless, a strong positive effect was found for patients following orthopaedic surgery, suggesting that the increased intensity provided by telerehabilitation is a promising option to be offered to patients. More and higher quality research is needed in this field especially with neurological patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michela Agostini
- Foundation IRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Laboratory of Kinematics and Robotics, Neurorehabilitation Department, via Alberoni 70, 30126, Venice, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Moja
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Orthopedic Institute Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
| | - Rita Banzi
- IRCCS-Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri", Via La Masa 19, 20156 Milan, Italy
| | - Vanna Pistotti
- IRCCS-Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri", Via La Masa 19, 20156 Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Tonin
- Foundation IRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Laboratory of Kinematics and Robotics, Neurorehabilitation Department, via Alberoni 70, 30126, Venice, Italy
| | - Annalena Venneri
- Department of Neuroscience, The University of Sheffield. Sheffield, UK Foundation IRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Laboratory of Neuroimaging, via Alberoni 70, 30126, Venice, Italy
| | - Andrea Turolla
- Foundation IRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Laboratory of Kinematics and Robotics, Neurorehabilitation Department, via Alberoni 70, 30126, Venice, Italy Department of Neuroscience, The University of Sheffield. Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Hussenbux A, Morrissey D, Joseph C, McClellan CM. Intermediate care pathways for musculoskeletal conditions--are they working? A systematic review. Physiotherapy 2014; 101:13-24. [PMID: 25442485 DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2014.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2014] [Revised: 08/27/2014] [Accepted: 09/03/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal condition assessment and management is increasingly delivered at the primary to secondary care interface, by inter-disciplinary triage and treat services. OBJECTIVES This review aimed to describe Intermediate Care pathways, evaluate effectiveness, describe outcomes and identify gaps in the evidence. DATA SOURCES PubMed, ISI Web of Science, EMBASE, Ovid Medline, PEDro, Google Scholar to October 2013. STUDY SELECTION/ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Studies in English that evaluated relevant services were considered for inclusion. Studies evaluating paediatric or emergency medicine and self-referral were excluded. RESULTS Twenty-three studies were identified. Between 72% and 97% of patients could be managed entirely within Intermediate Care with a 20% to 60% resultant reduction in orthopaedic referral rate. Patient reported outcome measures typically showed significant symptom improvements. Knee conditions were most commonly referred on to secondary care (35% to 56%), with plain films (5% to 23%) and MRI (10% to 18%) the commonest investigations. Physiotherapists' clinical decision making and referral accuracy were comparable to medical doctors in 68% to 96% of cases. Intermediate Care consistently leads to significantly reduced orthopaedic waiting times and high patient satisfaction. LIMITATIONS These findings are not based on strong evidence and there is an urgent need for high-quality, prospective, comprehensive evaluation of Intermediate Care provision, including cost-effectiveness and impact on other services. FUNDING Part funded by EPSRC and AXA-PPP. CONCLUSION Intermediate Care consistently improves patient outcome, typically results in appropriate referral and management, reduces waiting times and increases patient satisfaction. There is a case for wider provision of Intermediate Care services to effectively manage non-surgical musculoskeletal patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Hussenbux
- Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Bart's and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Hospital, Bancroft Road, London E1 4DG, UK
| | - D Morrissey
- Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Bart's and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Hospital, Bancroft Road, London E1 4DG, UK; Physiotherapy Department, Bart's Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
| | - C Joseph
- Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Bart's and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Hospital, Bancroft Road, London E1 4DG, UK
| | - C M McClellan
- Academic Department of Emergency Care, Adult Emergency Department, Bristol Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol BS28HW, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Rathod T, Belcher J, Montgomery AA, Salisbury C, Foster NE. Health services changes: is a run-in period necessary before evaluation in randomised clinical trials? Trials 2014; 15:41. [PMID: 24479729 PMCID: PMC3933371 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-41] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2013] [Accepted: 01/22/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most randomised clinical trials (RCTs) testing a new health service do not allow a run-in period of consolidation before evaluating the new approach. Consequently, health professionals involved may feel insufficiently familiar or confident, or that new processes or systems that are integral to the service are insufficiently embedded in routine care prior to definitive evaluation in a RCT. This study aimed to determine the optimal run-in period for a new physiotherapy-led telephone assessment and treatment service known as PhysioDirect and whether a run-in was needed prior to evaluating outcomes in an RCT. METHODS The PhysioDirect trial assessed whether PhysioDirect was as effective as usual care. Prior to the main trial, a run-in of up to 12 weeks was permitted to facilitate physiotherapists to become confident in delivering the new service. Outcomes collected from the run-in and main trial were length of telephone calls within the PhysioDirect service and patients' physical function (SF-36v2 questionnaire) and Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile v2 collected at baseline and six months. Joinpoint regression determined how long it had taken call times to stabilise. Analysis of covariance determined whether patients' physical function at six months changed from the run-in to the main trial. RESULTS Mean PhysioDirect call times (minutes) were higher in the run-in (31 (SD: 12.6)) than in the main trial (25 (SD: 11.6)). Each physiotherapist needed to answer 42 (95% CI: 20,56) calls for their mean call time to stabilise at 25 minutes per call; this took a minimum of seven weeks. For patients' physical function, PhysioDirect was equally clinically effective as usual care during both the run-in (0.17 (95% CI: -0.91,1.24)) and main trial (-0.01 (95% CI: -0.80,0.79)). CONCLUSIONS A run-in was not needed in a large trial testing PhysioDirect services in terms of patient outcomes. A learning curve was evident in the process measure of telephone call length. This decreased during the run-in and stabilised prior to commencement of the main trial. Future trials should build in a run-in if it is anticipated that learning would have an effect on patient outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials, ISRCTN55666618.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trishna Rathod
- Research Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK
| | - John Belcher
- School of Computing and Mathematics, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK
| | - Alan A Montgomery
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Chris Salisbury
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Community and Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Nadine E Foster
- Research Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Hartvigsen J, Natvig B, Ferreira M. Is it all about a pain in the back? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2013; 27:613-23. [PMID: 24315143 DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2013.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Multisite musculoskeletal pain is common among people suffering from low back pain. Although the mechanisms behind co-occurrence of multiple somatic symptoms and musculoskeletal pain are still unknown, patients with co-morbidities and co-occurring musculoskeletal symptoms tend to have worse functional status, a poorer prognosis and respond less favourably to treatment. Evidence also suggests that the more pain sites a patient reports, the more reduced their physical and mental function will be regardless of location of pain. At the same time, evidence suggests that strategies for diagnosis and treatment of low back pain and other musculoskeletal disorders such as neck pain and lower limb osteoarthritis are very similar. In this chapter, we discuss the prevalence, consequences, and implications of commonalities between low back pain, pain in other sites and co-occurring pain. In addition, we propose a conceptual framework for a common stepwise approach to the diagnosis and management of back and musculoskeletal pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Hartvigsen
- University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark; Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Hollinghurst S, Coast J, Busby J, Bishop A, Foster NE, Franchini A, Grove S, Hall J, Hopper C, Kaur S, Montgomery AA, Salisbury C. A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of 'PhysioDirect' telephone assessment and advice services for patients with musculoskeletal problems: economic evaluation. BMJ Open 2013; 3:e003406. [PMID: 24091423 PMCID: PMC3796275 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2013] [Revised: 08/23/2013] [Accepted: 08/27/2013] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the cost-effectiveness of PhysioDirect with usual physiotherapy care for patients with musculoskeletal problems. DESIGN (1) Cost-consequences comparing cost to the National Health Service (NHS), to patients, and the value of lost productivity with a range of outcomes. (2) Cost-utility analysis comparing cost to the NHS with Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs). SETTING Four physiotherapy services in England. PARTICIPANTS Adults (18+) referred by their general practitioner or self-referred for physiotherapy. INTERVENTIONS PhysioDirect involved telephone assessment and advice followed by face-to-face care if needed. Usual care patients were placed on a waiting list for face-to-face care. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES Primary clinical outcome: physical component summary from the SF-36v2 at 6 months. Also included in the cost-consequences: Measure Yourself Medical Outcomes Profile; a Global Improvement Score; response to treatment; patient satisfaction; waiting time. Outcome for the cost-utility analysis: QALYs. RESULTS 2249 patients took part (1506 PhysioDirect; 743 usual care). (1) Cost-consequences: there was no evidence of a difference between the two groups in the cost of physiotherapy, other NHS services, personal costs or value of time off work. Outcomes were also similar. (2) Cost-utility analysis based on complete cases (n=1272). Total NHS costs, including the cost of physiotherapy were higher in the PhysioDirect group by £19.30 (95% CI -£37.60 to £76.19) and there was a QALY gain of 0.007 (95% CI -0.003 to 0.016). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £2889 and the net monetary benefit at λ=£20 000 was £117 (95% CI -£86 to £310). CONCLUSIONS PhysioDirect may be a cost-effective alternative to usual physiotherapy care, though only with careful management of staff time. Physiotherapists providing the service must be more fully occupied than was possible under trial conditions: consideration should be given to the scale of operation, opening times of the service and flexibility in the methods used to contact patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Hollinghurst
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Joanna Coast
- Health Economics Unit, School of Health & Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - John Busby
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Annette Bishop
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Primary Care Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Nadine E Foster
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Primary Care Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Angelo Franchini
- Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Sean Grove
- Musculoskeletal Outpatient Department, Bristol Community Health, Bristol, UK
| | - Jeanette Hall
- Musculoskeletal Outpatient Department, Bristol Community Health, Bristol, UK
| | - Cherida Hopper
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Surinder Kaur
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Alan A Montgomery
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Chris Salisbury
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Salisbury C, Montgomery AA, Hollinghurst S, Hopper C, Bishop A, Franchini A, Kaur S, Coast J, Hall J, Grove S, Foster NE. Effectiveness of PhysioDirect telephone assessment and advice services for patients with musculoskeletal problems: pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2013; 346:f43. [PMID: 23360891 PMCID: PMC3558547 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f43] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/19/2012] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the clinical effectiveness, effect on waiting times, and patient acceptability of PhysioDirect services in patients with musculoskeletal problems, compared with usual care. DESIGN Pragmatic randomised controlled trial to assess equivalence in clinical effectiveness. Patients were individually randomised in a 2:1 ratio to PhysioDirect or usual care. SETTING Four physiotherapy services in England. PARTICIPANTS Adults (aged ≥ 18 years) referred by general practitioners or self referred for musculoskeletal physiotherapy. INTERVENTIONS PhysioDirect services invited patients to telephone a physiotherapist for initial assessment and advice, followed by face-to-face physiotherapy if necessary. Usual care involved patients joining a waiting list for face-to-face treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Numbers of appointments, waiting time for treatment, and non-attendance rates. Primary outcome was physical health (SF-36v2 physical component score) at six months. Secondary outcomes included four other measures of health outcome, mental component score and scales from the SF-36v2, time lost from work, and patient satisfaction and preference. Participants were not blind to allocation, but outcome data were collected blind to allocation. RESULTS Of 1506 patients allocated to PhysioDirect and 743 to usual care, 85% provided primary outcome data at six months (1283 and 629 patients, respectively). PhysioDirect patients had fewer face-to-face appointments than usual care patients (mean 1.91 v 3.11; incidence rate ratio 0.59 (95% confidence interval 0.53 to 0.65)), a shorter waiting time (median 7 days v 34 days; arm time ratio 0.32 (0.29 to 0.35)), and lower rates of non-attendance (incidence rate ratio 0.55 (0.41 to 0.73)). After six months' follow-up, the SF-36v2 physical component score was equivalent between groups (adjusted difference in means -0.01 (-0.80 to 0.79)). Health outcome measures suggested a trend towards slightly greater improvement in the PhysioDirect arm at six week follow-up and no difference at six months. There was no difference in time lost from work. PhysioDirect patients were no more satisfied with access to physiotherapy than usual care patients, but had slightly lower satisfaction overall at six months (difference in satisfaction -3.8% (-7.3% to -0.3%); P=0.031). PhysioDirect patients were more likely than usual care patients to prefer PhysioDirect in future. No adverse events were detected. CONCLUSIONS PhysioDirect is equally clinically effective compared with usual care, provides faster access to physiotherapy, and seems to be safe. However, it could be associated with slightly lower patient satisfaction. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN55666618.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Salisbury
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|