1
|
Mulvaney CA, Galbraith K, Webster KE, Rana M, Connolly R, Tudor-Green B, Marom T, Daniel M, Venekamp RP, Schilder AG, MacKeith S. Topical and oral steroids for otitis media with effusion (OME) in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 12:CD015255. [PMID: 38088821 PMCID: PMC10718197 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd015255.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Otitis media with effusion (OME) is an accumulation of fluid in the middle ear cavity, common amongst young children. The fluid may cause hearing loss. Although most episodes of OME in children resolve spontaneously within a few months, when persistent it may lead to behavioural problems and a delay in expressive language skills. Management of OME includes watchful waiting, medical, surgical and other treatments, such as autoinflation. Oral or topical steroids are sometimes used to reduce inflammation in the middle ear. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of topical and oral steroids for OME in children. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane ENT Register, CENTRAL, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished studies on 20 January 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomised trials in children aged 6 months to 12 years with unilateral or bilateral OME. We included studies that compared topical or oral steroids with either placebo or watchful waiting (no treatment). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes, determined by a multi-stakeholder prioritisation exercise, were: 1) hearing, 2) OME-specific quality of life and 3) systemic corticosteroid side effects. Secondary outcomes were: 1) presence/persistence of OME, 2) other adverse effects (including local nasal effects), 3) receptive language skills, 4) speech development, 5) cognitive development, 6) psychosocial outcomes, 7) listening skills, 8) generic health-related quality of life, 9) parental stress, 10) vestibular function and 11) episodes of acute otitis media. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence. Although we included all measures of hearing assessment, the proportion of children who returned to normal hearing was our preferred method to assess hearing, due to challenges in interpreting the results of mean hearing thresholds. MAIN RESULTS We included 26 studies in this review (2770 children). Most studies of oral steroids used prednisolone for 7 to 14 days. Studies of topical (nasal) steroids used various preparations (beclomethasone, fluticasone and mometasone) for between two weeks and three months. All studies had at least some concerns regarding risk of bias. Here we report our primary outcomes and main secondary outcome, at the longest reported follow-up. Oral steroids compared to placebo Oral steroids probably result in little or no difference in the proportion of children with normal hearing after 12 months (69.7% of children with steroids, compared to 61.1% of children receiving placebo, risk ratio (RR) 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97 to 1.33; 1 study, 332 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There is probably little or no difference in OME-related quality of life (mean difference (MD) in OM8-30 score 0.07, 95% CI -0.2 to 0.34; 1 study, 304 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Oral steroids may reduce the number of children with persistent OME at 6 to 12 months, but the size of the effect was uncertain (absolute risk reduction ranging from 13.3% to 45%, number needed to treat (NNT) of between 3 and 8; low-certainty evidence). The evidence was very uncertain regarding the risk of systemic corticosteroid side effects, and we were unable to conduct any meta-analysis for this outcome. Oral steroids compared to no treatment Oral steroids may result in little or no difference in the persistence of OME after three to nine months (74.5% children receiving steroids versus 73% of those receiving placebo; RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.17; 2 studies, 258 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence on adverse effects was very uncertain. We did not identify any evidence on hearing or disease-related quality of life. Topical (intranasal) steroids compared to placebo We did not identify data on the proportion of children who returned to normal hearing. However, the mean change in hearing threshold after two months was -0.3 dB lower (95% CI -6.05 to 5.45; 1 study, 78 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence suggests that nasal steroids make little or no difference to disease-specific quality of life after nine months (OM8-30 score, MD 0.05 higher, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.46; 1 study, 82 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain regarding the effect of nasal steroids on persistence of OME at up to one year. Two studies reported this: one showed a potential benefit for nasal steroids, the other showed a benefit with placebo (2 studies, 206 participants). The evidence was also very uncertain regarding the risk of corticosteroid-related side effects, as we were unable to provide a pooled effect estimate. Topical (intranasal) steroids compared to no treatment We did not identify data on the proportion of children who returned to normal hearing. However, the mean difference in final hearing threshold after four weeks was 1.95 dB lower (95% CI -3.85 to -0.05; 1 study, 168 participants; low-certainty evidence). Nasal steroids may reduce the persistence of OME after eight weeks, but the evidence was very uncertain (58.5% of children receiving steroids, compared to 81.3% of children without treatment, RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.91; 2 studies, 134 participants). We did not identify any evidence on disease-related quality of life or adverse effects. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Overall, oral steroids may have little effect in the treatment of OME, with little improvement in the number of children with normal hearing and no effect on quality of life. There may be a reduction in the proportion of children with persistent disease after 12 months. However, this benefit may be small and must be weighed against the potential for adverse effects associated with oral steroid use. The evidence for nasal steroids was all low- or very low-certainty. It is therefore less clear if nasal steroids have any impact on hearing, quality of life or persistence of OME. Evidence on adverse effects was very limited. OME is likely to resolve spontaneously for most children. The potential benefit of treatment may therefore be small and should be balanced with the risk of adverse effects. Future studies should aim to determine which children are most likely to benefit from treatment, rather than offering interventions to all children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline A Mulvaney
- Cochrane ENT, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kevin Galbraith
- Cochrane ENT, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Katie E Webster
- Cochrane ENT, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mridul Rana
- ENT Department, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Slough, UK
| | - Rachel Connolly
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK
| | - Ben Tudor-Green
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Tal Marom
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Samson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Ben Gurion University Faculty of Health Sciences, Ashdod, Israel
| | - Mat Daniel
- Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Roderick P Venekamp
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Anne Gm Schilder
- evidENT, Ear Institute, University College London, London, UK
- NIHR UCLH Biomedical Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
| | - Samuel MacKeith
- ENT Department, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
MacKeith S, Mulvaney CA, Galbraith K, Webster KE, Connolly R, Paing A, Marom T, Daniel M, Venekamp RP, Rovers MM, Schilder AG. Ventilation tubes (grommets) for otitis media with effusion (OME) in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 11:CD015215. [PMID: 37965944 PMCID: PMC10646987 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd015215.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Otitis media with effusion (OME) is an accumulation of fluid in the middle ear cavity, common amongst young children. It may cause hearing loss which, when persistent, may lead to developmental delay, social difficulty and poor quality of life. Management includes watchful waiting, autoinflation, medical and surgical treatment. Insertion of ventilation tubes has often been used as the preferred treatment. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects (benefits and harms) of ventilation tubes (grommets) for OME in children. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane ENT Register, CENTRAL, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials on 20 January 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in children (6 months to 12 years) with OME for ≥ 3 months. We included studies that compared ventilation tube (VT) insertion with five comparators: no treatment, watchful waiting (ventilation tubes inserted later, if required), myringotomy, hearing aids and other non-surgical treatments. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were determined following a multi-stakeholder prioritisation exercise and were: 1) hearing; 2) OME-specific quality of life; 3) persistent tympanic membrane perforation (as a severe adverse effect of the surgery). Secondary outcomes were: 1) persistence of OME; 2) other adverse effects (including tympanosclerosis, VT blockage and pain); 3) receptive language skills; 4) speech development; 5) cognitive development; 6) psychosocial skills; 7) listening skills; 8) generic health-related quality of life; 9) parental stress; 10) vestibular function; 11) episodes of acute otitis media. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for key outcomes. Although we included all measures of hearing assessment, the proportion of children who returned to normal hearing was our preferred method, due to challenges in interpreting the results of mean hearing thresholds. MAIN RESULTS We included 19 RCTs (2888 children). We considered most of the evidence to be very uncertain, due to wide confidence intervals for the effect estimates, few participants, and a risk of performance and detection bias. Here we report our key outcomes at the longest reported follow-up. There were some limitations to the evidence. No studies investigated the comparison of ventilation tubes versus hearing aids. We did not identify any data on disease-specific quality of life; however, many studies were conducted before the development of specific tools to assess this in otitis media. Short-acting ventilation tubes were used in most studies and thus specific data on the use of long-acting VTs is limited. Finally, we did not identify specific data on the effects of VTs in children at increased risk of OME (e.g. with craniofacial syndromes). Ventilation tubes versus no treatment (four studies) The odds ratio (OR) for a return to normal hearing after 12 months was 1.13 with VTs (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46 to 2.74; 54% versus 51%; 1 study, 72 participants; very low-certainty evidence). At six months, VTs may lead to a large reduction in persistent OME (risk ratio (RR) 0.30, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.65; 20.4% versus 68.0%; 1 study, 54 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the chance of persistent tympanic membrane perforation with VTs at 12 months (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.91; 8.3% versus 9.7%; 1 RCT, 144 participants). Early ventilation tubes versus watchful waiting (six studies) There was little to no difference in the proportion of children whose hearing returned to normal after 8 to 10 years (i.e. by the age of 9 to 13 years) (RR for VTs 0.98, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.03; 93% versus 95%; 1 study, 391 participants; very low-certainty evidence). VTs may also result in little to no difference in the risk of persistent OME after 18 months to 6 years (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.74; 15% versus 12%; 3 studies, 584 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We were unable to pool data on persistent perforation. One study showed that VTs may increase the risk of perforation after a follow-up duration of 3.75 years (RR 3.65, 95% CI 0.41 to 32.38; 1 study, 391 participants; very low-certainty evidence) but the actual number of children who develop persistent perforation may be low, as demonstrated by another study (1.26%; 1 study, 635 ears; very low-certainty evidence). Ventilation tubes versus non-surgical treatment (one study) One study compared VTs to six months of antibiotics (sulphisoxazole). No data were available on return to normal hearing, but final hearing thresholds were reported. At four months, the mean difference was -5.98 dB HL lower (better) for those receiving VTs, but the evidence is very uncertain (95% CI -9.21 to -2.75; 1 study, 125 participants; very low-certainty evidence). No evidence was identified regarding persistent OME. VTs may result in a low risk of persistent perforation at 18 months of follow-up (no events reported; narrative synthesis of 1 study, 60 participants; low-certainty evidence). Ventilation tubes versus myringotomy (nine studies) We are uncertain whether VTs may slightly increase the likelihood of returning to normal hearing at 6 to 12 months, since the confidence intervals were wide and included the possibility of no effect (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.59 to 2.53; 74% versus 64%; 2 studies, 132 participants; very low-certainty evidence). After six months, persistent OME may be reduced for those who receive VTs compared to laser myringotomy, but the evidence is very uncertain (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.38; 1 study, 272 participants; very low-certainty evidence). At six months, the risk of persistent perforation is probably similar with the use of VTs or laser myringotomy (narrative synthesis of 6 studies, 581 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There may be small short- and medium-term improvements in hearing and persistence of OME with VTs, but it is unclear whether these persist after longer follow-up. The RCTs included do not allow us to say when (or how much) VTs improve hearing in any specific child. However, interpretation of the evidence is difficult: many children in the control groups recover spontaneously or receive VTs during follow-up, VTs may block or extrude, and OME may recur. The limited evidence in this review also affects the generalisability/applicability of our findings to situations involving children with underlying conditions (e.g. craniofacial syndromes) or the use of long-acting tubes. Consequently, RCTs may not be the best way to determine whether an intervention is likely to be effective in any individual child. Instead, we must better understand the different OME phenotypes to target interventions to children who will benefit most, and avoid over-treating when spontaneous resolution is likely.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel MacKeith
- ENT Department, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Caroline A Mulvaney
- Cochrane ENT, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kevin Galbraith
- Cochrane ENT, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Katie E Webster
- Cochrane ENT, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Aye Paing
- Guideline Development Team A, NICE, London, UK
| | - Tal Marom
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Ben Gurion University, Ashdod, Israel
| | - Mat Daniel
- Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Roderick P Venekamp
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Maroeska M Rovers
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Anne Gm Schilder
- evidENT, Ear Institute, University College London, London, UK
- NIHR UCLH Biomedical Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mulvaney CA, Galbraith K, Webster KE, Rana M, Connolly R, Marom T, Daniel M, Venekamp RP, Schilder AG, MacKeith S. Antibiotics for otitis media with effusion (OME) in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 10:CD015254. [PMID: 37870130 PMCID: PMC10591283 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd015254.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Otitis media with effusion (OME) is an accumulation of fluid in the middle ear cavity, common amongst young children. The fluid may cause hearing loss. When persistent, it may lead to developmental delay, social difficulty and poor quality of life. Management of OME includes watchful waiting, autoinflation, medical and surgical treatment. Antibiotics are sometimes used to treat any bacteria present in the effusion, or associated biofilms. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of oral antibiotics for otitis media with effusion (OME) in children. SEARCH METHODS The Cochrane ENT Information Specialist searched the Cochrane ENT Register, CENTRAL, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished studies to 20 January 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials in children aged 6 months to 12 years with unilateral or bilateral OME. We included studies that compared oral antibiotics with either placebo or no treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were determined following a multi-stakeholder prioritisation exercise and were: 1) hearing, 2) otitis media-specific quality of life and 3) anaphylaxis. Secondary outcomes were: 1) persistence of OME, 2) adverse effects, 3) receptive language skills, 4) speech development, 5) cognitive development, 6) psychosocial skills, 7) listening skills, 8) generic health-related quality of life, 9) parental stress, 10) vestibular function and 11) episodes of acute otitis media. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. Although we included all measures of hearing assessment, the proportion of children who returned to normal hearing was our preferred method to assess hearing, due to challenges in interpreting the results of mean hearing thresholds. MAIN RESULTS We identified 19 completed studies that met our inclusion criteria (2581 participants). They assessed a variety of oral antibiotics (including penicillins, cephalosporins, macrolides and trimethoprim), with most studies using a 10- to 14-day treatment course. We had some concerns about the risk of bias in all studies included in this review. Here we report our primary outcomes and main secondary outcome, at the longest reported follow-up time. Antibiotics versus placebo We included 11 studies for this comparison, but none reported all of our outcomes of interest and limited meta-analysis was possible. Hearing One study found that more children may return to normal hearing by two months (resolution of the air-bone gap) after receiving antibiotics as compared with placebo, but the evidence is very uncertain (Peto odds ratio (OR) 9.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.51 to 26.18; 20/49 children who received antibiotics returned to normal hearing versus 0/37 who received placebo; 1 study, 86 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Disease-specific quality of life No studies assessed this outcome. Presence/persistence of OME At 6 to 12 months of follow-up, the use of antibiotics compared with placebo may slightly reduce the number of children with persistent OME, but the confidence intervals were wide, and the evidence is very uncertain (risk ratio (RR) 0.89, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.17; 48% versus 54%; number needed to treat (NNT) 17; 2 studies, 324 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Adverse event: anaphylaxis No studies provided specific data on anaphylaxis. Three of the included studies (448 children) did report adverse events in sufficient detail to assume that no anaphylactic reactions occurred, but the evidence is very uncertain (very low-certainty evidence). Antibiotics versus no treatment We included eight studies for this comparison, but very limited meta-analysis was possible. Hearing One study found that the use of antibiotics compared to no treatment may result in little to no difference in final hearing threshold at three months (mean difference (MD) -5.38 dB HL, 95% CI -9.12 to -1.64; 1 study, 73 participants; low-certainty evidence). The only data identified on the return to normal hearing were reported at 10 days of follow-up, which we considered to be too short to accurately reflect the efficacy of antibiotics. Disease-specific quality of life No studies assessed this outcome. Presence/persistence of OME Antibiotics may reduce the proportion of children who have persistent OME at up to three months of follow-up, when compared with no treatment (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.80; 6 studies, 542 participants; low-certainty evidence). Adverse event: anaphylaxis No studies provided specific data on anaphylaxis. Two of the included studies (180 children) did report adverse events in sufficient detail to assume that no anaphylactic reactions occurred, but the evidence is very uncertain (very low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The evidence for the use of antibiotics for OME is of low to very low certainty. Although the use of antibiotics compared to no treatment may have a slight beneficial effect on the resolution of OME at up to three months, the overall impact on hearing is very uncertain. The long-term effects of antibiotics are unclear and few of the studies included in this review reported on potential harms. These important endpoints should be considered when weighing up the potential short- and long-term benefits and harms of antibiotic treatment in a condition with a high spontaneous resolution rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline A Mulvaney
- Cochrane ENT, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kevin Galbraith
- Cochrane ENT, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Katie E Webster
- Cochrane ENT, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mridul Rana
- ENT Department, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Slough, UK
| | - Rachel Connolly
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK
| | - Tal Marom
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Ben Gurion University Faculty of Health Sciences, Ashdod, Israel
| | - Mat Daniel
- Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Roderick P Venekamp
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Anne Gm Schilder
- evidENT, Ear Institute, University College London, London, UK
- NIHR UCLH Biomedical Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
| | - Samuel MacKeith
- ENT Department, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
MacKeith S, Mulvaney CA, Galbraith K, Webster KE, Paing A, Connolly R, Marom T, Daniel M, Venekamp RP, Schilder AG. Adenoidectomy for otitis media with effusion (OME) in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 10:CD015252. [PMID: 37870083 PMCID: PMC10591285 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd015252.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Otitis media with effusion (OME) is an accumulation of fluid in the middle ear cavity, common amongst young children. The fluid may cause hearing loss. When persistent, it may lead to developmental delay, social difficulty and poor quality of life. Management of OME includes watchful waiting, autoinflation, medical and surgical treatment. Adenoidectomy has often been used as a potential treatment for this condition. OBJECTIVES To assess the benefits and harms of adenoidectomy, either alone or in combination with ventilation tubes (grommets), for OME in children. SEARCH METHODS The Cochrane ENT Information Specialist searched the Cochrane ENT Register; Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; Web of Science; ClinicalTrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 20 January 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials in children aged 6 months to 12 years with unilateral or bilateral OME. We included studies that compared adenoidectomy (alone, or in combination with ventilation tubes) with either no treatment or non-surgical treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methods. Primary outcomes (determined following a multi-stakeholder prioritisation exercise): 1) hearing, 2) otitis media-specific quality of life, 3) haemorrhage. SECONDARY OUTCOMES 1) persistence of OME, 2) adverse effects, 3) receptive language skills, 4) speech development, 5) cognitive development, 6) psychosocial skills, 7) listening skills, 8) generic health-related quality of life, 9) parental stress, 10) vestibular function, 11) episodes of acute otitis media. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. Although we included all measures of hearing assessment, the proportion of children who returned to normal hearing was our preferred method to assess hearing, due to challenges in interpreting the results of mean hearing thresholds. MAIN RESULTS We included 10 studies (1785 children). Many of the studies used concomitant interventions for all participants, including insertion of ventilation tubes or myringotomy. All included studies had at least some concerns regarding the risk of bias. We report results for our main outcome measures at the longest available follow-up. We did not identify any data on disease-specific quality of life for any of the comparisons. Further details of additional outcomes and time points are reported in the review. 1) Adenoidectomy (with or without myringotomy) versus no treatment/watchful waiting (three studies) After 12 months there was little difference in the proportion of children whose hearing had returned to normal, but the evidence was very uncertain (adenoidectomy 68%, no treatment 70%; risk ratio (RR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65 to 1.46; number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) 50; 1 study, 42 participants). There is a risk of haemorrhage from adenoidectomy, but the absolute risk appears small (1/251 receiving adenoidectomy compared to 0/229, Peto odds ratio (OR) 6.77, 95% CI 0.13 to 342.54; 1 study, 480 participants; moderate certainty evidence). The risk of persistent OME may be slightly lower after two years in those receiving adenoidectomy (65% versus 73%), but again the difference was small (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.00; NNTB 13; 3 studies, 354 participants; very low-certainty evidence). 2) Adenoidectomy (with or without myringotomy) versus non-surgical treatment No studies were identified for this comparison. 3) Adenoidectomy and bilateral ventilation tubes versus bilateral ventilation tubes (four studies) There was a slight increase in the proportion of ears with a return to normal hearing after six to nine months (57% adenoidectomy versus 42% without, RR 1.36, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.89; NNTB 7; 1 study, 127 participants (213 ears); very low-certainty evidence). Adenoidectomy may give an increased risk of haemorrhage, but the absolute risk appears small, and the evidence was uncertain (2/416 with adenoidectomy compared to 0/375 in the control group, Peto OR 6.68, 95% CI 0.42 to 107.18; 2 studies, 791 participants). The risk of persistent OME was similar for both groups (82% adenoidectomy and ventilation tubes compared to 85% ventilation tubes alone, RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.07; very low-certainty evidence). 4) Adenoidectomy and unilateral ventilation tube versus unilateral ventilation tube (two studies) Slightly more children returned to normal hearing after adenoidectomy, but the confidence intervals were wide (57% versus 46%, RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.96; NNTB 9; 1 study, 72 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Fewer children may have persistent OME after 12 months, but again the confidence intervals were wide (27.2% compared to 40.5%, RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.29; NNTB 8; 1 study, 74 participants). We did not identify any data on haemorrhage. 5) Adenoidectomy and ventilation tubes versus no treatment/watchful waiting (two studies) We did not identify data on the proportion of children who returned to normal hearing. However, after two years, the mean difference in hearing threshold for those allocated to adenoidectomy was -3.40 dB (95% CI -5.54 to -1.26; 1 study, 211 participants; very low-certainty evidence). There may be a small reduction in the proportion of children with persistent OME after two years, but the evidence was very uncertain (82% compared to 90%, RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.01; NNTB 13; 1 study, 232 participants). We noted that many children in the watchful waiting group had also received surgery by this time point. 6) Adenoidectomy and ventilation tubes versus non-surgical treatment No studies were identified for this comparison. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS When assessed with the GRADE approach, the evidence for adenoidectomy in children with OME is very uncertain. Adenoidectomy may reduce the persistence of OME, although evidence about the effect of this on hearing is unclear. For patients and carers, a return to normal hearing is likely to be important, but few studies measured this outcome. We did not identify any evidence on disease-specific quality of life. There were few data on adverse effects, in particular postoperative bleeding. The risk of haemorrhage appears to be small, but should be considered when choosing a treatment strategy for children with OME. Future studies should aim to determine which children are most likely to benefit from treatment, rather than offering interventions to all children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel MacKeith
- ENT Department, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Caroline A Mulvaney
- Cochrane ENT, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kevin Galbraith
- Cochrane ENT, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Katie E Webster
- Cochrane ENT, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Aye Paing
- Guideline Development Team A, NICE, London, UK
| | | | - Tal Marom
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Ben Gurion University Faculty of Health Sciences, Ashdod, Israel
| | - Mat Daniel
- Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Roderick P Venekamp
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Anne Gm Schilder
- evidENT, Ear Institute, University College London, London, UK
- NIHR UCLH Biomedical Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Webster KE, Mulvaney CA, Galbraith K, Rana M, Marom T, Daniel M, Venekamp RP, Schilder AG, MacKeith S. Autoinflation for otitis media with effusion (OME) in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 9:CD015253. [PMID: 37750500 PMCID: PMC10521168 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd015253.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Otitis media with effusion (OME) is an accumulation of fluid in the middle ear cavity, common amongst young children. The fluid may cause hearing loss. When persistent, it may lead to behavioural problems and a delay in expressive language skills. Management of OME includes watchful waiting, medical, surgical and mechanical treatment. Autoinflation is a self-administered technique, which aims to ventilate the middle ear and encourage middle ear fluid clearance by providing a positive pressure of air in the nose and nasopharynx (using a nasal balloon or other handheld device). This positive pressure (sometimes combined with simultaneous swallow) encourages opening of the Eustachian tube and may help ventilate the middle ear. OBJECTIVES To assess the efficacy (benefits and harms) of autoinflation for the treatment of otitis media with effusion in children. SEARCH METHODS The Cochrane ENT Information Specialist searched the Cochrane ENT Register; Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; Web of Science; ClinicalTrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 20 January 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomised trials in children aged 6 months to 12 years with unilateral or bilateral OME. We included studies that compared autoinflation with either watchful waiting (no treatment), non-surgical treatment or ventilation tubes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were determined following a multi-stakeholder prioritisation exercise and were: 1) hearing, 2) OME-specific quality of life and 3) pain and distress. Secondary outcomes were: 1) persistence of OME, 2) other adverse effects (including eardrum perforation), 3) compliance or adherence to treatment, 4) receptive language skills, 5) speech development, 6) cognitive development, 7) psychosocial skills, 8) listening skills, 9) generic health-related quality of life, 10) parental stress, 11) vestibular function and 12) episodes of acute otitis media. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. Although we included all measures of hearing assessment, the proportion of children who returned to normal hearing was our preferred method to assess hearing, due to challenges in interpreting the results of mean hearing thresholds. MAIN RESULTS We identified 11 completed studies that met our inclusion criteria (1036 participants). The majority of studies included children aged between 3 and 11 years. Most were carried out in Europe or North America, and they were conducted in both hospital and community settings. All compared autoinflation (using a variety of different methods and devices) to no treatment. Most studies required children to carry out autoinflation two to three times per day, for between 2 and 12 weeks. The outcomes were predominantly assessed just after the treatment phase had been completed. Here we report the effects at the longest follow-up for our main outcome measures. Return to normal hearing The evidence was very uncertain regarding the effect of autoinflation on the return to normal hearing. The longest duration of follow-up was 11 weeks. At this time point, the risk ratio was 2.67 in favour of autoinflation (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.73 to 4.12; 85% versus 32%; number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) 2; 1 study, 94 participants), but the certainty of the evidence was very low. Disease-specific quality of life Autoinflation may result in a moderate improvement in quality of life (related to otitis media) after short-term follow-up. One study assessed quality of life using the Otitis Media Questionnaire-14 (OMQ-14) at three months of follow-up. Results were reported as the number of standard deviations above or below zero difference, with a range from -3 (better) to +3 (worse). The mean difference was -0.42 lower (better) for those who received autoinflation (95% CI -0.62 to -0.22; 1 study, 247 participants; low-certainty evidence; the authors report a change of 0.3 as clinically meaningful). Pain and distress caused by the procedure Autoinflation may result in an increased risk of ear pain, but the evidence was very uncertain. One study assessed this outcome, and identified a risk ratio of 3.50 for otalgia in those who received autoinflation, although the overall occurrence of pain was low (95% CI 0.74 to 16.59; 4.4% versus 1.3%; number needed to treat to harm (NNTH) 32; 1 study, 320 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Persistence of OME The evidence suggests that autoinflation may slightly reduce the persistence of OME at three months. Four studies were included, and the risk ratio for persistence of OME was 0.88 for those receiving autoinflation (95% CI 0.80 to 0.97; 4 studies, 483 participants; absolute reduction of 89 people per 1000 with persistent OME; NNTB 12; low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS All the evidence we identified was of low or very low certainty, meaning that we have little confidence in the estimated effects. However, the data suggest that autoinflation may have a beneficial effect on OME-specific quality of life and persistence of OME in the short term, but the effect is uncertain for return to normal hearing and adverse effects. The potential benefits should be weighed against the inconvenience of regularly carrying out autoinflation, and the possible risk of ear pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie E Webster
- Cochrane ENT, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Caroline A Mulvaney
- Cochrane ENT, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kevin Galbraith
- Cochrane ENT, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mridul Rana
- ENT Department, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Slough, UK
| | - Tal Marom
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Samson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Ben Gurion University Faculty of Health Sciences, Ashdod, Israel
| | - Mat Daniel
- Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Roderick P Venekamp
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Anne Gm Schilder
- evidENT, Ear Institute, University College London, London, UK
- NIHR UCLH Biomedical Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
| | - Samuel MacKeith
- ENT Department, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Labree B, Hoare DJ, Fackrell K, Hall DA, Gascoyne LE, Sereda M. Establishing a Core Domain Set for early-phase clinical trials of electrical stimulation interventions for tinnitus in adults: protocol for an online Delphi study. Trials 2022; 23:1039. [PMID: 36539777 PMCID: PMC9769048 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-07020-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tinnitus is the awareness of a sound in the ear or head in the absence of an external source. It affects around 10-15% of people and current treatment options are limited. Experimental treatments include various forms of electrical stimulation of the brain. Currently, there is no consensus on the outcomes that should be measured when investigating the efficacy of this type of intervention for tinnitus. This study seeks to address this by establishing a Core Domain Set: a common standard of what specific tinnitus-related complaints are critical and important to assess in all clinical trials of electrical stimulation-based interventions for tinnitus. METHODS A two-round online survey will be conducted, followed by a stakeholder consensus meeting to identify a Core Domain Set. Participants will belong to one of two stakeholder groups: healthcare users with lived experience of tinnitus, and professionals with relevant clinical, commercial, or research experience. DISCUSSION This study will establish a Core Domain Set for the evaluation of electrical stimulation-based interventions for tinnitus via an e-Delphi study. The resulting Core Domain Set will act as a minimum standard for reporting in future clinical trials of electrical stimulation interventions for tinnitus. Standardisation will facilitate comparability of research findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bas Labree
- grid.511312.50000 0004 9032 5393NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK ,grid.4563.40000 0004 1936 8868Hearing Sciences, Mental Health and Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Derek J. Hoare
- grid.511312.50000 0004 9032 5393NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK ,grid.4563.40000 0004 1936 8868Hearing Sciences, Mental Health and Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kathryn Fackrell
- grid.511312.50000 0004 9032 5393NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK ,grid.4563.40000 0004 1936 8868Hearing Sciences, Mental Health and Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK ,grid.5491.90000 0004 1936 9297Wessex Institute, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Deborah A. Hall
- grid.511312.50000 0004 9032 5393NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK ,grid.472615.30000 0004 4684 7370Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Putrajaya, Malaysia
| | - Lauren E. Gascoyne
- grid.4563.40000 0004 1936 8868Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Magdalena Sereda
- grid.511312.50000 0004 9032 5393NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK ,grid.4563.40000 0004 1936 8868Hearing Sciences, Mental Health and Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lei R, Shen Q, Yang B, Hou T, Liu H, Luo X, Li Y, Zhang J, Norris SL, Chen Y. Core Outcome Sets in Child Health: A Systematic Review. JAMA Pediatr 2022; 176:1131-1141. [PMID: 36094597 DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.3181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Developing core outcome sets is essential to ensure that results of clinical trials are comparable and useful. A number of core outcome sets in pediatrics have been published, but a comprehensive in-depth understanding of core outcome sets in this field is lacking. OBJECTIVE To systematically identify core outcome sets in child health, collate the diseases to which core outcome sets have been applied, describe the methods used for development and stakeholder participation, and evaluate the methodological quality of existing core outcome sets. EVIDENCE REVIEW MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were searched using relevant search terms, such as clinical trials, core outcome, and children, along with relevant websites, such as Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET). Four researchers worked in teams of 2, performed literature screening and data extraction, and evaluated the methodological quality of core outcome sets using the Core Outcome Set-Standards for Development (COS-STAD). FINDINGS A total of 77 pediatric core outcome sets were identified, mainly developed by organizations or researchers in Europe, North America, and Australia and mostly from the UK (22 [29%]) and the US (22 [29%]). A total of 77 conditions were addressed; the most frequent International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision category was diseases of the digestive system (14 [18%]). Most of the outcomes in pediatric core outcome sets were unordered (34 [44%]) or presented in custom classifications (29 [38%]). Core outcome sets used 1 or more of 8 development methods; the most frequent combination of methods was systematic review/literature review/scoping review, together with the Delphi approach and consensus for decision-making (10 [14%]). Among the 6 main types of stakeholders, clinical experts were the most frequently involved (74 [100%]), while industry representatives were rarely involved (4 [5%]). Only 6 core outcome sets (8%) met the 12 criteria of COS-STAD. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Future quality of pediatric core outcome sets should be improved based on the standards proposed by the COMET initiative, while core outcome sets methodology and reporting standards should be extended to pediatric populations to help improve the quality of core outcome sets in child health. In addition, the COMET outcome taxonomy should also add items applicable to children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruobing Lei
- Chevidence Lab of Child and Adolescent Health, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Chongqing, China.,Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, China.,China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, Chongqing, China.,Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing, China
| | - Quan Shen
- Chevidence Lab of Child and Adolescent Health, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Chongqing, China.,Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, China.,China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, Chongqing, China.,Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing, China
| | - Bo Yang
- Shapingba District Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Chongqing, Chongqing, China
| | - Tianchun Hou
- Chevidence Lab of Child and Adolescent Health, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Chongqing, China.,Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, China.,China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, Chongqing, China.,Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing, China
| | - Hui Liu
- School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xufei Luo
- School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yuehuan Li
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Junhua Zhang
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | | | - Yaolong Chen
- Chevidence Lab of Child and Adolescent Health, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.,Research Unit of Evidence-Based Evaluation and Guidelines, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.,WHO Collaborating Center for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation, Lanzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hunter KE, Webster AC, Clarke M, Page MJ, Libesman S, Godolphin PJ, Aberoumand M, Rydzewska LHM, Wang R, Tan AC, Li W, Mol BW, Willson M, Brown V, Palacios T, Seidler AL. Development of a checklist of standard items for processing individual participant data from randomised trials for meta-analyses: Protocol for a modified e-Delphi study. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0275893. [PMID: 36219622 PMCID: PMC9553056 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Individual participant data meta-analyses enable detailed checking of data quality and more complex analyses than standard study-level synthesis of summary data based on publications. However, there is limited existing guidance on the specific systematic checks that should be undertaken to confirm and enhance data quality for individual participant data meta-analyses and how to conduct these checks. We aim to address this gap by developing a checklist of items for data quality checking and cleaning to be applied to individual participant data meta-analyses of randomised trials. This study will comprise three phases: 1) a scoping review to identify potential checklist items; 2) two e-Delphi survey rounds among an invited panel of experts followed by a consensus meeting; and 3) pilot testing and refinement of the checklist, including development of an accompanying R-markdown program to facilitate its uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kylie E. Hunter
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- * E-mail:
| | - Angela C. Webster
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mike Clarke
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew J. Page
- Methods in Evidence Synthesis Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sol Libesman
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peter J. Godolphin
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mason Aberoumand
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Rui Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Aidan C. Tan
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Wentao Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ben W. Mol
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Melina Willson
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Vicki Brown
- Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
| | - Talia Palacios
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anna Lene Seidler
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Core outcome set for early intervention trials to prevent obesity in childhood (COS-EPOCH): Agreement on "what" to measure. Int J Obes (Lond) 2022; 46:1867-1874. [PMID: 35927469 PMCID: PMC9492532 DOI: 10.1038/s41366-022-01198-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background Heterogeneity in the outcomes collected and reported in trials of interventions to prevent obesity in the first five years of life highlights the need for a core outcome set to streamline intervention evaluation and synthesis of effects. This study aimed to develop a core outcome set for use in early childhood obesity prevention intervention studies in children from birth to five years of age (COS-EPOCH). Methods The development of the core outcome set followed published guidelines and consisted of three stages: (1) systematic scoping review of outcomes collected and reported in early childhood obesity prevention trials; (2) e-Delphi study with stakeholders to prioritise outcomes; (3) meeting with stakeholders to reach consensus on outcomes. Stakeholders included parents/caregivers of children aged ≤ five years, policy-makers/funders, researchers, health professionals, and community and organisational stakeholders interested in obesity prevention interventions. Results Twenty-two outcomes from nine outcome domains (anthropometry, dietary intake, sedentary behaviour, physical activity, sleep, outcomes in parents/caregivers, environmental, emotional/cognitive functioning, economics) were included in the core outcome set: infant tummy time; child diet quality, dietary intake, fruit and vegetable intake, non-core food intake, non-core beverage intake, meal patterns, weight-based anthropometry, screentime, time spent sedentary, physical activity, sleep duration, wellbeing; parent/caregiver physical activity, sleep and nutrition parenting practices; food environment, sedentary behaviour or physical activity home environment, family meal environment, early childhood education and care environment, household food security; economic evaluation. Conclusions The systematic stakeholder-informed study identified the minimum outcomes recommended for collection and reporting in early childhood obesity prevention trials. Future work will investigate the recommended instruments to measure each of these outcomes. The core outcome set will standardise guidance on the measurement and reporting of outcomes from early childhood obesity prevention interventions, to better facilitate evidence comparison and synthesis, and maximise the value of data collected across studies.
Collapse
|
10
|
Cleft palate and ventilation tubes: a prophylactic dilemma. J Laryngol Otol 2022; 137:501-505. [PMID: 35611594 DOI: 10.1017/s0022215122001232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to understand, in a long-term follow-up study, whether the placement of grommets had been necessary after cleft palate surgical correction. METHOD A case-control, retrospective study was carried out on consecutive paediatric patients who underwent surgical repair of a cleft palate. RESULTS The study population included 138 patients, divided into 2 groups: group 1 - patients in whom grommets were placed at the time of cleft palate surgery, and group 2 - patients in whom grommets were not placed at the time of cleft palate surgery. During the follow up, in groups 1 and 2, 65.2 per cent and 67.8 per cent, respectively, did not need subsequent grommet placement after cleft palate surgery. CONCLUSION Of patients, 56.5 per cent did not need ventilation tubes at any point during follow up. The placement of grommets is not innocuous; therefore, its use at the time of cleft palate surgical repair should be reconsidered.
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of topical and oral steroids for otitis media with effusion (OME) in children.
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of autoinflation for otitis media with effusion (OME) in children.
Collapse
|
13
|
Khan K, Rada M, Elfituri A, Betschart C, Falconi G, Haddad JM, Doumouchtsis SK. Outcome reporting in trials on conservative interventions for pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review for the development of a core outcome set. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2021; 268:100-109. [PMID: 34894536 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.08.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Significant risk of bias and limitations in outcome selections in trials evaluating conservative treatments for the management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) have been highlighted and preclude comparability of outcomes, synthesis of primary studies and high quality evidence. OBJECTIVES As systematic review of the reported outcomes is the first step in the process of development of a Core Outcome Set (COS), we aimed to systematically review reporting of outcomes and outcome measures in Randomised Control Trials (RCTs) on conservative treatments for POP and develop an inventory of them for consideration as core outcome and outcome measures sets. We evaluated methodological quality, outcome reporting quality and publication characteristics and their associations among published RCTs. STUDY DESIGN Systematic review of RCTs identified from the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE and MEDLINE (Pubmed). RCTs evaluating the effectiveness of conservative interventions for the management of POP were considered for inclusion. Outcomes and outcome measures were obtained from the RCTs and an inventory was created. Outcomes were grouped in domains and themes. Methodological quality, outcome reporting quality and publication characteristics were evaluated and statistically analysed. RESULTS Twenty-five trials (3179 women) were included and reported 31 outcomes and 50 outcome measures. Reporting rates of the outcomes investigated ranged between 4% and 56%. The most commonly reported outcome domains were patient reported symptoms, stage of POP expressed as POP-Q stage, and quality of life. Univariate analysis demonstrated no significant correlations of methodological and outcome reporting parameters. CONCLUSIONS There is a need to increase comparability of RCTs. Reporting standardized outcomes included in a COS for conservative interventions for POP will facilitate the comparability across RCTs. While the process of developing COS is in progress, we propose the interim use of the three most commonly reported outcomes in each domain: patient-reported outcomes (symptom distress including bowel and urinary symptoms, sexual function), stage of prolapse and quality of life parameters using validated questionnaires (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 (PFDI-20), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire/Health related quality of life (PFIQ-7/HRQOL) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact Questionnaire (POPIQ-7).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimmee Khan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Epsom & St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.
| | - Maria Rada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Abdullatif Elfituri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Epsom & St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Cornelia Betschart
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gabriele Falconi
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Complex Operative Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Jorge Milhem Haddad
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Urogynaecology Division, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Stergios K Doumouchtsis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Epsom & St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK; Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research N. S. Christeas, University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece; St George's University of London, London, UK; American University of the Caribbean, School of Medicine, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA; Ross University, School of Medicine, Miramar, FL, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
de Blacam C, Baylis AL, Kirschner RE, Smith S, Sell D, Sie KCY, Harris HE, Orr DJA. Core Outcome Set for Reporting Outcomes of Interventions for Velopharyngeal Dysfunction: Final Results of the COS-VPD Initiative. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2021; 59:S84-S96. [PMID: 34398725 DOI: 10.1177/10556656211035026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To date, the recording of outcomes of interventions for velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) has not been standardized. This makes a comparison of results between studies challenging. The aim of this study was to develop a core outcome set (COS) for reporting outcomes in studies examining the management of VPD. DESIGN A two-round Delphi consensus process was used to develop the COS. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS The expert Delphi panel comprised patients and caregivers of patients with VPD, surgeons and speech and language therapists specializing in cleft palate, and researchers with expertise in VPD. INTERVENTIONS A long list of outcomes was derived from the published literature. In each round of a Delphi survey, participants were asked to score outcomes using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations scale of 1 to 9, with 1 to 3 labeled "not important," 4 to 6 labeled "important but not critical," and 7 to 9 labeled "critical." MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Consensus criteria were specified a priori. Outcomes with a rating of 75% or more of the panel rating 7 to 9 and 25% or fewer rating 1 to 3 were included in the COS. RESULTS A total of 31 core outcomes were identified from the Delphi process. This list was condensed to combine topic areas to produce a final COS of 10 outcomes, including both processes of care and patient-reported outcomes that should be considered for reporting in future studies of VPD. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of the COS-VPD will facilitate consistency of outcomes data collection and comparison of results across studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine de Blacam
- 575349Department of Plastic Surgery, 11595Children's Health Ireland at Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland.,8863Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Adriane L Baylis
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2650Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.,12305The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Richard E Kirschner
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2650Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.,12305The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Susan Smith
- 162839Department of General Practice, 8863Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Debbie Sell
- Speech and Language Therapy, 4956Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Kathleen C Y Sie
- Pediatric Otolaryngology, 7274Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | - David J A Orr
- 575349Department of Plastic Surgery, 11595Children's Health Ireland at Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland.,8809Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Koempel J, Osterbauer B, Badash I, Goel P, Fahradyan A, Zhang Z, Hammoudeh J. Exceptionally early tympanostomy tube placement in pediatric patients with cleft lip and palate. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 145:110744. [PMID: 33940380 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE At our institution, cleft lip repair is performed at or before 8 weeks of age, and tympanostomy tubes (TT) have been inserted concurrently in some of these patients. Our objective was to determine the feasibility and present the preliminary results of TT placement at this early age. METHODS A retrospective review was conducted of 22 patients born with cleft lip and/or palate who had TT placement in the first 8 weeks of life. Data collected included complications and audiologic function post TT placement. RESULTS Subjects had a mean age of 3.9 weeks at the time of TT placement and cleft lip repair. Thirteen patients (59%) reported otorrhea during the follow-up period. Eighteen of 21 (86%) patients who underwent auditory evaluation had normal audiological function following TT placement. One patient had sensorineural hearing loss and 2 patients had mild conductive hearing loss due to bilateral extruded TT and OME at 15.9 and 39.2 months after surgery. CONCLUSION Exceptionally early TT is feasible. Placing TT at or before 8 weeks of age did not result in any major complications but demonstrated a high incidence of otorrhea. A randomized, prospective study with a larger sample size is necessary to determine the benefits of TT placement at this age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Koempel
- Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 4650 Sunset Blvd. Mailstop #48, Los Angeles, CA, 90027, USA
| | - Beth Osterbauer
- Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 4650 Sunset Blvd. Mailstop #48, Los Angeles, CA, 90027, USA.
| | - Ido Badash
- University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, 1975 Zonal Ave, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Pedram Goel
- University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, 1975 Zonal Ave, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Artur Fahradyan
- Children's Hospital Los Angeles Division of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, 4650 Sunset Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, 90027, USA
| | - Zhipeng Zhang
- University of Southern California, Tina and Rick Caruso Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 1450 San Pablo St #5100, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Jeffrey Hammoudeh
- Children's Hospital Los Angeles Division of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, 4650 Sunset Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, 90027, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Veskimae E, Subbarayan S, Campi R, Carron D, Omar MI, Yuan C, Dimitropoulos K, Van Hemelrijck M, Bryan RT, N'Dow J, Babjuk M, Alfred Witjes J, Sylvester R, MacLennan S. A Systematic Review of Outcome Reporting, Definition and Measurement Heterogeneity in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Effectiveness Trials of Adjuvant, Prophylactic Treatment After Transurethral Resection. Bladder Cancer 2021; 7:221-241. [PMID: 38994538 PMCID: PMC11181687 DOI: 10.3233/blc-201510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Heterogenous outcome reporting in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) effectiveness trials of adjuvant treatment after transurethral resection (TURBT) has been noted in systematic reviews (SRs). This hinders comparing results across trials, combining them in meta-analyses, and evidence-based decision-making for patients and clinicians. OBJECTIVE We aimed to systematically review the extent of reporting and definition heterogeneity. METHODS We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) identified from SRs comparing adjuvant treatments after TURBT or TURBT alone in patients with NMIBC (with or without carcinoma in situ) published between 2000-2020. Abstracts and full texts were screened independently by two reviewers. Data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by another. RESULTS We screened 807 abstracts; from 15 SRs, 57 RCTs were included. Verbatim outcome names were coded to standard outcome names and organised using the Williamson and Clarke taxonomy. Recurrence (98%), progression (74%), treatment response (in CIS studies) (40%), and adverse events (77%) were frequently reported across studies. However, overall (33%) and cancer-specific (33%) survival, treatment completion (17%) and treatment change (37%) were less often reported. Quality of Life (3%) and economic outcomes (2%) were rarely reported. Heterogeneity was evident throughout, particularly in the definitions of progression and recurrence, and how CIS patients were handled in the analysis of studies with predominantly papillary patients, highlighting further issues with the definition of recurrence and progression vs treatment response for CIS patients. Data reporting was also inconsistent, with some trials reporting event rates at various time-points and others reporting time-to-event with or without Hazard Ratios. Adverse events were inconsistently reported. QoL data was absent in most trials. CONCLUSIONS Heterogenous outcome reporting is evident in NMIBC effectiveness trials. This has profound implications for meta-analyses, SRs and evidence-based treatment decisions. A core outcome set is required to reduce heterogeneity. PATIENT SUMMARY This systematic review found inconsistencies in outcome definitions and reporting, pointing out the urgent need for a core outcome set to help improve evidence-based treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Veskimae
- Department of Urology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | | | - Riccardo Campi
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | | | - Cathy Yuan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Konstantinos Dimitropoulos
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
- Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Mieke Van Hemelrijck
- King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Translational and Oncology Research (TOUR), London, UK
| | - Richard T Bryan
- Institute of Cancer & Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - James N'Dow
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
- Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Marek Babjuk
- Department of Urology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - J Alfred Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Borre ED, Diab MM, Ayer A, Zhang G, Emmett SD, Tucci DL, Wilson BS, Kaalund K, Ogbuoji O, Sanders GD. Evidence gaps in economic analyses of hearing healthcare: A systematic review. EClinicalMedicine 2021; 35:100872. [PMID: 34027332 PMCID: PMC8129894 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hearing loss is a common and costly medical condition. This systematic review sought to identify evidence gaps in published model-based economic analyses addressing hearing loss to inform model development for an ongoing Lancet Commission. METHODS We searched the published literature through 14 June 2020 and our inclusion criteria included decision model-based cost-effectiveness analyses that addressed diagnosis, treatment, or prevention of hearing loss. Two investigators screened articles for inclusion at the title, abstract, and full-text levels. Data were abstracted and the studies were assessed for the qualities of model structure, data assumptions, and reporting using a previously published quality scale. FINDINGS Of 1437 articles identified by our search, 117 unique studies met the inclusion criteria. Most of these model-based analyses were set in high-income countries (n = 96, 82%). The evaluated interventions were hearing screening (n = 35, 30%), cochlear implantation (n = 34, 29%), hearing aid use (n = 28, 24%), vaccination (n = 22, 19%), and other interventions (n = 29, 25%); some studies included multiple interventions. Eighty-six studies reported the main outcome in quality-adjusted or disability-adjusted life-years, 24 of which derived their own utility values. The majority of the studies used decision tree (n = 72, 62%) or Markov (n = 41, 35%) models. Forty-one studies (35%) incorporated indirect economic effects. The median quality rating was 92/100 (IQR:72-100). INTERPRETATION The review identified a large body of literature exploring the economic efficiency of hearing healthcare interventions. However, gaps in evidence remain in evaluation of hearing healthcare in low- and middle-income countries, as well as in investigating interventions across the lifespan. Additionally, considerable uncertainty remains around productivity benefits of hearing healthcare interventions as well as utility values for hearing-assisted health states. Future economic evaluations could address these limitations. FUNDING NCATS 3UL1-TR002553-03S3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan D. Borre
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Mohamed M. Diab
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Austin Ayer
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Gloria Zhang
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Susan D. Emmett
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Debara L. Tucci
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Blake S. Wilson
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Kamaria Kaalund
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Osondu Ogbuoji
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
- Center for Policy Impact in Global Health, Duke Global Health Institute, Durham NC, United States
| | - Gillian D. Sanders
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
- Duke University Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham NC, United States
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
- Corresponding author at: Gillian Sanders Schmidler, PhD, Duke-Robert J. Margolis, MD, Center for Health Policy, 100 Fuqua Drive, Box 90120, Durham, NC 27708-0120.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hermelijn S, Kersten C, Mullassery D, Muthialu N, Cobanoglu N, Gartner S, Bagolan P, Mesas Burgos C, Sgro A, Heyman S, Till H, Suominen J, Schurink M, Desender L, Losty P, Ertresvag K, Tiddens HAWM, Wijnen RMH, Schnater M. Development of a core outcome set for congenital pulmonary airway malformations: study protocol of an international Delphi survey. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e044544. [PMID: 33846152 PMCID: PMC8047990 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A worldwide lack of consensus exists on the optimal management of asymptomatic congenital pulmonary airway malformation (CPAM) even though the incidence is increasing. Either a surgical resection is performed or a wait-and-see policy is employed, depending on the treating physician. Management is largely based on expert opinion and scientific evidence is scarce. Wide variations in outcome measures are seen between studies making comparison difficult thus highlighting the lack of universal consensus in outcome measures as well. We aim to define a core outcome set which will include the most important core outcome parameters for paediatric patients with an asymptomatic CPAM. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study will include a critical appraisal of the current literature followed by a three-stage Delphi process with two stakeholder groups. One surgical group including paediatric as well as thoracic surgeons, and a non-surgeon group including paediatric pulmonologists, intensive care and neonatal specialists. All participants will score outcome parameters according to their level of importance and the most important parameters will be determined by consensus. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Electronic informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Ethical approval is not required. After the core outcome set has been defined, we intend to design an international randomised controlled trial: the COllaborative Neonatal NEtwork for the first CPAM Trial, which will be aimed at determining the optimal management of patients with asymptomatic CPAM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergei Hermelijn
- Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Casper Kersten
- Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dhanya Mullassery
- Pediatric Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - Nagarajan Muthialu
- Pediatric Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - Nazan Cobanoglu
- Pediatric Pulmonology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Silvia Gartner
- Pediatric Pulmonology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pietro Bagolan
- Department of Medical and Surgical Neonatology, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesu, Roma, Italy
| | | | - Alberto Sgro
- Pediatric Surgery, Padua University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Stijn Heyman
- Pediatric Surgery, ZNA-GZA Paola Children's Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Holger Till
- Pediatric Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Janne Suominen
- Pediatric Surgery, University of Helsinki Children's Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Maarten Schurink
- Pediatric Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth Desender
- Pediatric Surgery, Ghent University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gent, Belgium
| | - Paul Losty
- Pediatric Surgery, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Harm A W M Tiddens
- Pediatric Pulmonology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rene M H Wijnen
- Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marco Schnater
- Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hallas S, Nelson A, O'Meara S, Adderley U, Meskell P, Nixon J, O'Loughlin A, Probst S, Tawfick W, Wild T, Gethin G. Development of a core outcome set for venous leg ulceration (CoreVen) research evaluations (protocol). J Tissue Viability 2021; 30:317-323. [PMID: 33846059 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2021.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2019] [Revised: 02/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A venous leg ulcer is a chronic leg wound caused by poor venous blood circulation in the lower limbs. It is a recurring condition causing pain, malodour, reduced mobility, and depression. Randomised controlled trials evaluating treatments for venous leg ulcers provide important evidence to inform clinical decision-making. However, for findings to be useful, outcomes need to be clinically meaningful, consistently reported across trials, and fully reported. Research has identified the large number of outcomes reported in venous leg ulcer trials, impacting both synthesis of results, and clinical decision-making. To address this, a core outcome set will be developed. A core outcome set is an agreed standardised set of outcomes which should be, as a minimum, measured and reported in all trials which evaluate treatment effectiveness for a given indication. A core outcome set has the potential to reduce research waste, improve the utility of RCTs, reduce reporting bias, facilitate treatment comparisons across different sources of evidence and expedite the production of systematic reviews, meta-analyses and evidence-based clinical guidelines. AIM The aim of this project is to develop a core outcome set for research evaluating the effectiveness of interventions for treating venous leg ulceration. METHODS Through a scoping review of the literature on venous leg ulceration, we will firstly identify a list of candidate outcome domains (broad categories in relation to what is being measured) from randomised controlled trials and qualitative research, and outcomes (specific methods in relation to what is being measured). In two further stages, we will use the resulting lists of outcome domains and outcomes to design two online surveys. A range of stakeholders will be invited to participate in the surveys and they will be asked to indicate which outcome domains and outcomes are most important and should be considered as core in future research reports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Hallas
- Academic Unit of Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
| | - Andrea Nelson
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Una Adderley
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Pauline Meskell
- Department of Nursing & Midwifery, Faculty of Education & Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Jane Nixon
- Leeds Institute Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, UK
| | - Aonghus O'Loughlin
- Alliance for Research and Innovation in Wounds, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland; Saolta University Health Care Group, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland; School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland; Bon Secours Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - Sebastian Probst
- HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, School of Health Sciences, Geneva, Switzerland; University Hospital Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Wael Tawfick
- Alliance for Research and Innovation in Wounds, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland; Saolta University Health Care Group, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland; School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Thomas Wild
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; University of Applied Science Anhalt, Institute of Applied Bioscience and Process Management, Germany; Clinic of Plastic, Hand and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical Center Dessau, University of Applied Science Anhalt, Germany; Clinic of Dermatology, Immunology and Allergology, Medical Center Dessau, Medical University Brandenburg, Theodor Fontane, Medical Center Dessau, Germany
| | - Georgina Gethin
- Alliance for Research and Innovation in Wounds, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland; School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
de Blacam C, Baylis AL, Kirschner RE, Smith SM, Sell D, Sie KCY, Harris HE, Orr DJA. Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for reporting outcomes of management of velopharyngeal dysfunction. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e036824. [PMID: 32792441 PMCID: PMC7430341 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) is present in up to 40% of patients following cleft palate repair. Children with VPD display hypernasal speech, nasal air emission and are at a high risk for developing articulation disorders. The overall result is decreased intelligibility and acceptability of speech, as well as significant functional and social impairments. Although there are several surgical approaches for the management of children with VPD, standard treatment protocols have not been well defined. There is a need for a core outcome set (COS) to reduce outcome reporting bias and heterogeneity across studies of VPD. The COS-VPD Initiative is an international effort to establish a COS for the reporting of studies of the management of VPD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The study has been developed according to the Core Outcome Set-STAandards for Development standards for the design of a COS study and will be carried out according to the guidance of the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative. A long list of clinical and patient-reported outcomes will be identified from a systematic review of the literature. A two-stage Delphi consensus process will be used to refine this list into a COS. An international panel of key stakeholders including patients, parents and multidisciplinary clinical and academic experts will be invited to participate in this process. Consensus criteria will be specified a priori and the steering group will ratify the final COS. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has ethical approval through Children's Health Ireland at Crumlin Research and Ethics Committee, Ref: GEN/683/18. The study is registered with the COMET Initiative (http://www.cometinitiative.org/studies/details/1146?result=true). The COS will be disseminated by publication in the peer-reviewed literature, presentation at international research meetings and distribution to patient-representative organisations. This will facilitate the application of the COS in future studies of the management of VPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine de Blacam
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Our Lady's Children's Hospital, Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Surgical Affairs, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Adriane L Baylis
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Richard E Kirschner
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Susan M Smith
- Department of General Practice, RCSI, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Debbie Sell
- Centre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability (ORCHID), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Kathleen C Y Sie
- Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | - David J A Orr
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Our Lady's Children's Hospital, Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Liu PZ, Ismail-Koch H, Stephenson K, Donne AJ, Fergie N, Derry J, Stynes G, Kamani T, Birchall JP, Daniel M. A core outcome set for research on the management of otitis media with effusion in otherwise-healthy children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 134:110029. [PMID: 32272377 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Revised: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A Core Outcome Set (COS) is an agreed list of outcome domains to be reported by all studies investigating a condition. A COS for Otitis Media with Effusion (OME) in children with cleft palate exists (called MOMENT), but there isn't one for otherwise-healthy children. This study investigates whether the MOMENT COS could also be applicable to otherwise-healthy children. METHODS A long list of potential outcomes was generated (independently of MOMENT) via three methods: literature review to establish which outcomes are reported by OME studies, a review of outcomes contained in OME questionnaires, and a focus group asking parents of children with OME what matters to them. The long list drawn up using these sources identified no outcomes additional to ones in the MOMENT long list. An online questionnaire was subsequently undertaken, asking parents/guardians and professionals/researchers whether they think that the MOMENT final list outcomes would also be applicable to otherwise healthy children. RESULTS A total of 134 people took part: 53 parents/guardians (recruited through UK NHS hospitals) and 81 professionals/researchers (recruited internationally). Overall, 128 (95.5%) agreed that the MOMENT outcomes can also apply to otherwise healthy children (100% parents/guardians, 92.6% professionals/researchers). CONCLUSIONS The outcome domains identified in the COS for OME management in children with cleft palate can also be used in otherwise-healthy children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Zhaobo Liu
- Nottingham University Hospital / Nottingham Children's Hospital, United Kingdom.
| | | | - Kate Stephenson
- Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Adam J Donne
- Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Neil Fergie
- Nottingham University Hospital / Nottingham Children's Hospital, United Kingdom; Sherwood Forest Hospitals, United Kingdom
| | - Jo Derry
- Nottingham University Hospital / Nottingham Children's Hospital, United Kingdom
| | - Gill Stynes
- Nottingham University Hospital / Nottingham Children's Hospital, United Kingdom
| | - Tawakir Kamani
- Nottingham University Hospital / Nottingham Children's Hospital, United Kingdom
| | - John P Birchall
- Nottingham University Hospital / Nottingham Children's Hospital, United Kingdom
| | - Mat Daniel
- Nottingham University Hospital / Nottingham Children's Hospital, United Kingdom; Mat Daniel Consulting, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Rönsch H, Apfelbacher C, Brans R, Ofenloch R, Schuttelaar MLA, Weisshaar E, Bauer A. Protocol for the development of a core domain set for hand eczema trials. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2020; 34:2871-2876. [PMID: 32274874 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.16429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2019] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical hand eczema trials measure a variety of outcome domains to determine the success of interventions. This considerably limits the comparability and overall confidence in the study results, and thereby the strength of recommendations for clinical practice. OBJECTIVES The Hand Eczema Core Outcome Set (HECOS) initiative aims to develop a core outcome set (COS) for the standardized evaluation of interventions in future hand eczema trials and reviews. This COS will define the minimum that should be measured and reported in controlled and randomized-controlled trials of therapeutic hand eczema interventions. The objective of this protocol is to specify the methods to develop a core domain set. METHODS In Phase 1, a list of candidate domains will be derived from a systematic literature review concerning previously measured outcomes in hand eczema trials, from qualitative patient interviews and from expert interviews. In Phase 2, a consensus study about core domains will be conducted by an online 3-round Delphi survey and a face-to-face meeting, applying predefined consensus criteria. HECOS involves hand eczema and methods experts as well as patients and further stakeholders with an interest in the initiative. OUTLOOK When a set of core domains has been defined, HECOS is going to identify appropriate outcome measurement instruments in a development process that will be detailed in another protocol. The COS will considerably enhance the methodological quality, comparability and usefulness of hand eczema trials for clinical decision-making and the development of new therapeutic options for hand eczema, and also reduce the effort of planning, conducting, and reporting individual hand eczema studies, reviews and meta-analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Rönsch
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University, Dresden, Germany
| | - C Apfelbacher
- Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - R Brans
- Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatological Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm) at the University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - R Ofenloch
- Occupational Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, Ruprecht-Karls-University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M L A Schuttelaar
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - E Weisshaar
- Occupational Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, Ruprecht-Karls-University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A Bauer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Katiri R, Hall DA, Buggy N, Hogan N, Horobin A, van de Heyning P, Firszt JB, Bruce IA, Kitterick PT. Core Rehabilitation Outcome Set for Single Sided Deafness (CROSSSD) study: protocol for an international consensus on outcome measures for single sided deafness interventions using a modified Delphi survey. Trials 2020; 21:238. [PMID: 32131880 PMCID: PMC7057560 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-4094-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2019] [Accepted: 01/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Single-sided deafness (SSD) describes the presence of a unilateral severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss. SSD disrupts spatial hearing and understanding speech in background noise. It has functional, psychological and social consequences. Potential options for rehabilitation include hearing aids and auditory implants. Benefits and harms of these interventions are documented inconsistently in the literature, using a variety of outcomes ranging from tests of speech perception to quality of life questionnaires. It is therefore difficult to compare interventions when rehabilitating SSD. The Core Rehabilitation Outcome Set for Single Sided Deafness (CROSSSD) study is an international initiative that aims to develop a minimum set of core outcomes for use in future trials of SSD interventions. METHODS/DESIGN The CROSSSD study adopts an international two-round online modified Delphi survey followed by a stakeholder consensus meeting to identify a patient-centred core outcome domain set for SSD based on what is considered critical and important for assessing whether an intervention for SSD has worked. DISCUSSION The resulting core outcome domain set will act as a minimum standard for reporting in future clinical trials and could have further applications in guiding the use of outcome measures in clinical practice. Standardisation will facilitate comparison of research findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roulla Katiri
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), Ropewalk House, 113 The Ropewalk, Nottingham, NG1 5DU, United Kingdom
- Department of Audiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, D07 R2WY, Ireland
- Hearing Sciences, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom
| | - Deborah A Hall
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), Ropewalk House, 113 The Ropewalk, Nottingham, NG1 5DU, United Kingdom
- Hearing Sciences, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom
- University of Nottingham Malaysia, Jalan Broga, 43500, Semenyih, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
| | - Nora Buggy
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), Ropewalk House, 113 The Ropewalk, Nottingham, NG1 5DU, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas Hogan
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), Ropewalk House, 113 The Ropewalk, Nottingham, NG1 5DU, United Kingdom
| | - Adele Horobin
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), Ropewalk House, 113 The Ropewalk, Nottingham, NG1 5DU, United Kingdom
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical Centre, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom
| | - Paul van de Heyning
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
- Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Jill B Firszt
- School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America
| | - Iain A Bruce
- Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, United Kingdom
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
| | - Pádraig T Kitterick
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), Ropewalk House, 113 The Ropewalk, Nottingham, NG1 5DU, United Kingdom.
- Hearing Sciences, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom.
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical Centre, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Rieu-Chevreau C, Lavagen N, Gbaguidi C, Dakpé S, Klopp-Dutote N, Page C. Risk of occurrence and recurrence of otitis media with effusion in children suffering from cleft palate. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 120:1-5. [PMID: 30735917 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.01.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2018] [Revised: 01/29/2019] [Accepted: 01/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Rieu-Chevreau
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Amiens University Medical Center, Amiens, France
| | - Nolwenn Lavagen
- Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Amiens University Medical Center, Amiens, France
| | - Cica Gbaguidi
- Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Amiens University Medical Center, Amiens, France
| | - Stéphanie Dakpé
- Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Amiens University Medical Center, Amiens, France
| | - Nathalie Klopp-Dutote
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Amiens University Medical Center, Amiens, France
| | - Cyril Page
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Amiens University Medical Center, Amiens, France.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
O'Donnell C, Black N, McCourt K, McBrien M, Clarke M, Patterson C, Blackwood B, McAuley D, Shields M. Development of a Core Outcome Set for studies evaluating the effects of anaesthesia on perioperative morbidity and mortality following hip fracture surgery. Br J Anaesth 2019; 122:120-130. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2018] [Revised: 08/02/2018] [Accepted: 08/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
|
26
|
Hall DA, Hibbert A, Smith H, Haider HF, Londero A, Mazurek B, Fackrell K. One Size Does Not Fit All: Developing Common Standards for Outcomes in Early-Phase Clinical Trials of Sound-, Psychology-, and Pharmacology-Based Interventions for Chronic Subjective Tinnitus in Adults. Trends Hear 2019; 23:2331216518824827. [PMID: 30803389 PMCID: PMC6354310 DOI: 10.1177/2331216518824827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2018] [Revised: 12/11/2018] [Accepted: 12/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Good practice in clinical trials advocates common standards for assessing and reporting condition-specific complaints ("outcome domains"). For tinnitus, there is no common standard. The Core Outcome Measures in Tinnitus International Delphi (COMiT'ID) study created recommendations that are relevant to the most common intervention approaches for chronic subjective tinnitus in adults using consensus methods. Here, the objectives were to examine why it is important to tailor outcome domain selection to the tinnitus intervention that is being evaluated in the clinical trial and to demonstrate that the COMiT'ID recommendations are robust. The COMiT'ID study used an online three-round Delphi method with three separate surveys for sound-, psychology-, and pharmacology-based interventions. Survey data were analyzed to assess quality and confidence in the consensus achieved across surveys and stakeholder groups and between survey rounds. Results found participants were highly discriminatory in their decision-making. Of the 34 outcome domains reaching the prespecified consensus definition in the final round, 17 (50%) were unique to one intervention, while only 12 (35%) were common to all three. Robustness was demonstrated by an acceptable level of agreement across and within stakeholder groups, across survey rounds, across medical specialties (for the health-care practitioners), and across health-care users with varying tinnitus duration. There were few dissenting voices, and results showed no attrition bias. In conclusion, there is compelling evidence that one set of outcomes does not fit all therapeutic aims. Our analyses evidence robust decisions by the electronic Delphi process, leading to recommendations for three unique intervention-specific outcome domain sets. This provides an important starting point for standardization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah A. Hall
- National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Ropewalk House, UK
- Hearing Sciences, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK
- Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Queens Medical Centre, UK
- University of Nottingham Malaysia, Semeniyh, Malaysia
| | - Alice Hibbert
- National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Ropewalk House, UK
- Hearing Sciences, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Harriet Smith
- National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Ropewalk House, UK
- Hearing Sciences, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Haúla F. Haider
- ENT Department, Hospital Cuf Infante Santo – Nova Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Alain Londero
- Service ORL et CCF, Consultation Acouphène et Hyperacousie, Hôpital Européen G. Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Birgit Mazurek
- Tinnitus Center, Charite University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kathryn Fackrell
- National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Ropewalk House, UK
- Hearing Sciences, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Godinho RN, Sih T, Ibiapina CDC, Oliveira MHMDF, Rezende ALDF, Tassara RV. Cleft lip and palate associated hearing loss in Brazilian children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 115:38-40. [PMID: 30368389 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.08.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2018] [Revised: 08/07/2018] [Accepted: 08/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cleft lip and palate children have chronic otitis media related to Eustachian Tube dysfunction and associated conductive hearing loss. In this group of children, communicative skill development limitations, in association with orofacial aesthetics and functional disorders, can lead to behavioral, educational and social problems. METHODS We evaluated the minimum hearing threshold and the air-bone gap (ABG) in a range from 500 to 4000 Hz for 4-14 years old cleft lip and palate children (CLPC). This cross-sectional study took place in a multiprofessional tertiary care center and involved 89 CLPC with bilateral or unilateral postforamen or transforamen malformation, divided into two groups: those aged 4-7 and 8-14 years. The hearing tests of 89 children were evaluated: 53 (group I) aged from 4 to 7 years (67.9% male) and 36 (group II) aged from 8 to 14 years (55.6% female). RESULTS The minimum hearing threshold 500-4 KHz mean (MHT 500-4 KHz) was 19.4 dB for all children. MHT 500-4 KHz was 21.2 dB and 17.5 dB respectively for the group I and group II. Both groups demonstrated a minimum hearing threshold of up to 70 dB at certain frequencies. The global ABG 500-4 KHz average was 16.6 dB (SD 12.5): 19.7 dB (SD 12.9) in group I and 13.2 dB (SD 11.1) in group II. CONCLUSION The worst hearing thresholds were found in children of 4-7 years old: 21.2 dB MHT 500-4 KHz and 19.7 ABG 500-4 KHz, what is a disadvantage for them, as the normal hearing thresholds are up to 15 dB. The children of 8-14 years old had MHT 500-4 KHz of 17.5 dB, and ABG 500-4KHZ OF 13.2 with up to 70 dB of hearing loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo Neves Godinho
- College of Medical Sciences of Minas Gerais, Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais, Brazil.
| | - Tania Sih
- Medical College of University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kwinter A, Dworschak-Stokan A, Paradis J, Husein M. Association between symptomatic submucous cleft palate and otologic disease: A retrospective review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 115:77-81. [PMID: 30368399 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.09.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2018] [Revised: 09/19/2018] [Accepted: 09/21/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Submucous cleft palate (SMCP) is the most common congenital malformation of the posterior palate and characterized in part by palatal muscle diastasis. Patients with SMCP are considered symptomatic when suffering from velopharyngeal insufficiency which leads to hypernasality of speech and excess nasal air emission. SMCP results from defects in the muscles thought to be responsible for regulating the patency of the eustachian tube which can lead to a number of middle ear pathologies and ultimately hearing loss. Hearing loss, especially at a young age, can make speech acquisition a challenge. The purpose of this study was to review patients with symptomatic SMCP (SSMCP) who have presented to our center and report on the association between SSMCP and otologic disease. METHODS This study was a retrospective review of all patients presenting to our center between 2004 and 2016. Patients with SSMCP were identified through a patient database maintained on site. Inclusion criteria were diagnosis of SMCP and documentation of the presence or absence of otologic disease. Once identified patient records were reviewed and various demographic and patient factors were recorded. Patients were then grouped into cohorts of those with and without otologic disease and those requiring tympanostomy tubes and not. T-tests were then used to compare various factors between cohorts. RESULTS A total of 73 patients were identified and 58 met inclusion criteria (mean age 5.8 years, male:female 36:22). 27.5% of patients were diagnosed with a genetic condition. 69% of patients had otologic disease and 47% required at least one set of bilateral tympanostomy myringotomy tubes. The cohort with ear disease tended to have worse scores on ACPA testing though this was not statistically significant. There were no significant demographic differences between the cohorts. CONCLUSIONS Patients with symptomatic SMCP suffer from a higher incidence of otologic disease and bilateral myringotomy tube placement than the general population. This is an important potential comorbidity in SSMCP patients as it can act as a further barrier to speech acquisition. Further research is needed to determine if otologic disease can be used for prognostication or treatment purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Kwinter
- Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, Children's Hospital, 800 Commissioners Rd E, London, ON, N6A 5A5, Canada
| | - Ann Dworschak-Stokan
- Thames Valley Children's Center, 779 Base Line Rd E, London, ON, N6C 5Y6, Canada
| | - Josee Paradis
- Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, Children's Hospital, 800 Commissioners Rd E, London, ON, N6A 5A5, Canada
| | - Murad Husein
- Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, Children's Hospital, 800 Commissioners Rd E, London, ON, N6A 5A5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
van Miert C, Fernandes RM, Eccleson H, Bedson E, Lane S, Peak M, Thorburn K, Compton V, Woolfall K, Lacy D, Williamson P, McNamara PS. Non-invasive ventilation for the management of children with bronchiolitis (NOVEMBR): a feasibility study and core outcome set development protocol. Trials 2018; 19:627. [PMID: 30428935 PMCID: PMC6236891 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2969-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2018] [Accepted: 10/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bronchiolitis is an acute lower respiratory infection which predominantly affects young children. Treatment for bronchiolitis is limited to supportive therapy. Nasal oxygen therapy is part of routine care, and delivery now incorporates varying levels of non-invasive continuous positive airway pressure and/or high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy. Despite wide clinical use, there remains a lack of evidence on the comparative effectiveness and safety of these interventions. Furthermore, research in this field is hampered by the use of multiple outcome measures in current clinical trials. METHODS/DESIGN This mixed methods study includes a systematic review of outcome measures, telephone interviews with parents, focus group workshops and a Delphi survey with healthcare professionals and parents. These methods will be used to identify and prioritise outcomes for inclusion in a core outcome set and to explore issues pertinent to the design of a future randomised controlled trial comparing different modes of oxygen therapy for bronchiolitis. UK hospitals will also be contacted and asked to complete a survey to provide an overview of current practice to enable assessment of capability and capacity to run a future clinical trial. DISCUSSION This study will facilitate the design of a future clinical trial of non-invasive ventilation in children with bronchiolitis which is acceptable to important stakeholders. Furthermore, core outcome set development will improve standardisation, measurement and reporting of clinically important outcomes in bronchiolitis. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN75766048. Registered on 18 December 2017. This study was retrospectively registered in the ISRCTN Registry and on the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative database (15 September 2017).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare van Miert
- School of Nursing and Allied Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Room 3.12 Henry Cotton Building, 15-21 Webster Street, Liverpool, L3 2ET UK
- Paediatric Medicines Research Unit, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Hospital Trust, Eaton Road, Liverpool, L12 2AP UK
| | - Ricardo M. Fernandes
- Clinical Pharmacology Lab/Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
- Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Helen Eccleson
- Medicines for Children Clinical Trials Unit, Clinical Trials Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Institute of Child Health, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, L12 2AP UK
| | - Emma Bedson
- Medicines for Children Clinical Trials Unit, Clinical Trials Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Institute of Child Health, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, L12 2AP UK
| | - Steven Lane
- Department of Biostatistics, Block F, Waterhouse Building, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL UK
| | - Matthew Peak
- Paediatric Medicines Research Unit, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Hospital Trust, Eaton Road, Liverpool, L12 2AP UK
| | - Kent Thorburn
- Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Hospital Trust, Eaton Road, Liverpool, L12 2AP UK
| | - Vanessa Compton
- Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Hospital Trust, Eaton Road, Liverpool, L12 2AP UK
| | - Kerry Woolfall
- MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, Block B, Room B112, 1st Floor Waterhouse Building, Liverpool, L69 3GL UK
| | - David Lacy
- Department of Paediatrics, Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Arrowe Park Road, Upton, Wirral, CH49 5PE UK
| | - Paula Williamson
- Department of Biostatistics, Block F, Waterhouse Building, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL UK
| | - Paul S. McNamara
- Institute of Child Health, University of Liverpool, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Eaton Road, Liverpool, L12 2AP UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kapitanova M, Knebel JF, El Ezzi O, Artaz M, de Buys Roessingh AS, Richard C. Influence of infancy care strategy on hearing in children and adolescents: A longitudinal study of children with unilateral lip and /or cleft palate. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 114:80-86. [PMID: 30262372 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.08.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2018] [Revised: 08/09/2018] [Accepted: 08/24/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the relation between ventilation tube insertion, otitis media with effusion duration and otologic outcomes in unilateral cleft lip and/or cleft palate children from infancy to teenage age. DESIGN AND POPULATION Retrospective longitudinal charts review of patients from the multidisciplinary cleft team of the University Hospital of Lausanne over a 30-year period. 146 charts from consecutive patients with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and/or cleft palate who were born between January 1986 and January 2003 were included. RESULTS The earlier in life a cleft child experience his first otitis media with effusion (OME), the worse his long-term hearing will be. Along with the age of onset of OME, we disclosed an influence of the duration of OME without ventilation tube (VT) insertion on short and long-term hearing outcomes. Different patterns were observed between cleft palate (CP) and cleft lip palate children (CLP), with a higher incidence of otitis media with effusion for the CLP group than the CP group. Direct positive relationship between VT insertion and hearing were disclosed and evaluation of long-term complications did not reveal significant relation with VT insertion. Of note, OME in CLP children led to a higher rate (but not statistically significant) of chronic ear complications than in the CP group, that may indicate more persistent OME or different adverse effect on the middle ear mucosa between CP and CLP children. CONCLUSIONS Individualized counseling should take into account different factors such as the type of cleft, the age of onset of OME and duration of OME, keeping in mind the adverse effect of persistent middle ear fluid. In the present report, results prone an early ventilation tube insertion to prevent short and long-term injury to the middle ear homeostasis, hearing loss and related issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryna Kapitanova
- ENT, Head and Neck Surgery Department, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean-François Knebel
- Laboratory for Investigative Neurophysiology (The LINE), Department of Radiology and Department of Clinical Neurosciences University Hospital Center and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; EEG Brain Mapping Core Centre for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Oumama El Ezzi
- Cleft Palate Multidisciplinary Team, University Hospital Center and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Center of the Canton of Vaud (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Mélody Artaz
- ENT, Head and Neck Surgery Department, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland; Cleft Palate Multidisciplinary Team, University Hospital Center and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Anthony S de Buys Roessingh
- Cleft Palate Multidisciplinary Team, University Hospital Center and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Center of the Canton of Vaud (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Céline Richard
- ENT, Head and Neck Surgery Department, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland; Laboratory for Investigative Neurophysiology (The LINE), Department of Radiology and Department of Clinical Neurosciences University Hospital Center and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Cleft Palate Multidisciplinary Team, University Hospital Center and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kloukos D, Fudalej P, Sequeira‐Byron P, Katsaros C. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 8:CD010403. [PMID: 30095853 PMCID: PMC6513261 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010403.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cleft lip and palate is one of the most common birth defects and can cause difficulties with feeding, speech and hearing, as well as psychosocial problems. Treatment of orofacial clefts is prolonged; it typically commences after birth and lasts until the child reaches adulthood or even into adulthood. Residual deformities, functional disturbances, or both, are frequently seen in adults with a repaired cleft. Conventional orthognathic surgery, such as Le Fort I osteotomy, is often performed for the correction of maxillary hypoplasia. An alternative intervention is distraction osteogenesis, which achieves bone lengthening by gradual mechanical distraction. This review is an update of the original version that was published in 2016. OBJECTIVES To provide evidence regarding the effects and long-term results of maxillary distraction osteogenesis compared to orthognathic surgery for the treatment of hypoplastic maxilla in people with cleft lip and palate. SEARCH METHODS Cochrane Oral Health's Information Specialist searched the following databases: Cochrane Oral Health's Trials Register (to 15 May 2018), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (the Cochrane Library, 2018, Issue 4), MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to 15 May 2018), Embase Ovid (1980 to 15 May 2018), and LILACS BIREME Virtual Health Library (Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information database; from 1982 to 15 May 2018). The US National Institutes of Health Trials Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov) and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched for ongoing trials. No restrictions were placed on the language or date of publication when searching the electronic databases. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing maxillary distraction osteogenesis to conventional Le Fort I osteotomy for the correction of cleft lip and palate maxillary hypoplasia in non-syndromic cleft patients aged 15 years or older. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors assessed studies for eligibility. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the included studies. We contacted trial authors for clarification or missing information whenever possible. All standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane were used. MAIN RESULTS We found six publications involving a total of 47 participants requiring maxillary advancement of 4 mm to 10 mm. All of them related to a single trial performed between 2002 and 2008 at the University of Hong Kong, but not all of the publications reported outcomes from all 47 participants. The study compared maxillary distraction osteogenesis with orthognathic surgery, and included participants from 13 to 45 years of age.Results and conclusions should be interpreted with caution given the fact that this was a single trial at high risk of bias, with a small sample size.The main outcomes assessed were hard and soft tissue changes, skeletal relapse, effects on speech and velopharyngeal function, psychological status, and clinical morbidities.Both interventions produced notable hard and soft tissue improvements. Nevertheless, the distraction group demonstrated a greater maxillary advancement, evaluated as the advancement of Subspinale A-point: a mean difference of 4.40 mm (95% CI 0.24 to 8.56) was recorded two years postoperatively.Horizontal relapse of the maxilla was significantly less in the distraction osteogenesis group five years after surgery. A total forward movement of A-point of 2.27 mm was noted for the distraction group, whereas a backward movement of 2.53 mm was recorded for the osteotomy group (mean difference 4.8 mm, 95% CI 0.41 to 9.19).No statistically significant differences could be detected between the groups in speech outcomes, when evaluated through resonance (hypernasality) at 17 months postoperatively (RR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.85) and nasal emissions at 17 months postoperatively (RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.14 to 66.53), or in velopharyngeal function at the same time point (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.52).Maxillary distraction initially lowered social self-esteem at least until the distractors were removed, at three months postoperatively, compared to the osteotomy group, but this improved over time and the distraction group had higher satisfaction with life in the long term (two years after surgery) (MD 2.95, 95% CI 014 to 5.76).Adverse effects, in terms of clinical morbidities, included mainly occlusal relapse and mucosal infection, with the frequency being similar between groups (3/15 participants in the distraction osteogenesis group and 3/14 participants in the osteotomy group). There was no severe harm to any participant. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This review found only one small randomised controlled trial concerning the effectiveness of distraction osteogenesis compared to conventional orthognathic surgery. The available evidence is of very low quality, which indicates that further research is likely to change the estimate of the effect. Based on measured outcomes, distraction osteogenesis may produce more satisfactory results; however, further prospective research comprising assessment of a larger sample size with participants with different facial characteristics is required to confirm possible true differences between interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Kloukos
- University of BernDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, School of Dental MedicineFreiburgstrasse 7BernSwitzerland3010
| | - Piotr Fudalej
- University of BernDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, School of Dental MedicineFreiburgstrasse 7BernSwitzerland3010
- Palacky University OlomoucDepartment of Orthodontics, Institute of Dentistry and Oral Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and DentistryPalackého 12OlomoucCzech Republic772 00
| | - Patrick Sequeira‐Byron
- University of BernDepartment of Preventive, Restorative and Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dental MedicineFreiburgstrasse 7BernBernSwitzerlandCH‐3010
| | - Christos Katsaros
- University of BernDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, School of Dental MedicineFreiburgstrasse 7BernSwitzerland3010
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
de Graaf H, Sukhtankar P, Arch B, Ahmad N, Lees A, Bennett A, Spowart C, Hickey H, Jeanes A, Armon K, Riordan A, Herberg J, Hackett S, Gamble C, Shingadia D, Pallett A, Clarke SC, Henman P, Emonts M, Sharland M, Finn A, Pollard AJ, Powell C, Marsh P, Ballinger C, Williamson PR, Clarke NM, Faust SN. Duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy for children with acute osteomyelitis or septic arthritis: a feasibility study. Health Technol Assess 2018; 21:1-164. [PMID: 28862129 DOI: 10.3310/hta21480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is little current consensus regarding the route or duration of antibiotic treatment for acute osteomyelitis (OM) and septic arthritis (SA) in children. OBJECTIVE To assess the overall feasibility and inform the design of a future randomised controlled trial (RCT) to reduce the duration of intravenous (i.v.) antibiotic use in paediatric OM and SA. DESIGN (1) A prospective service evaluation (cohort study) to determine the current disease spectrum and UK clinical practice in paediatric OM/SA; (2) a prospective cohort substudy to assess the use of targeted polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in diagnosing paediatric OM/SA; (3) a qualitative study to explore families' views and experiences of OM/SA; and (4) the development of a core outcome set via a systematic review of literature, Delphi clinician survey and stakeholder consensus meeting. SETTING Forty-four UK secondary and tertiary UK centres (service evaluation). PARTICIPANTS Children with OM/SA. INTERVENTIONS PCR diagnostics were compared with culture as standard of care. Semistructured interviews were used in the qualitative study. RESULTS Data were obtained on 313 cases of OM/SA, of which 218 (61.2%) were defined as simple disease and 95 (26.7%) were defined as complex disease. The epidemiology of paediatric OM/SA in this study was consistent with existing European data. Children who met oral switch criteria less than 7 days from starting i.v. antibiotics were less likely to experience treatment failure (9.6%) than children who met oral switch criteria after 7 days of i.v. therapy (16.1% when switch was between 1 and 2 weeks; 18.2% when switch was > 2 weeks). In 24 out of 32 simple cases (75%) and 8 out of 12 complex cases (67%) in which the targeted PCR was used, a pathogen was detected. The qualitative study demonstrated the importance to parents and children of consideration of short- and long-term outcomes meaningful to families themselves. The consensus meeting agreed on the following outcomes: rehospitalisation or recurrence of symptoms while on oral antibiotics, recurrence of infection, disability at follow-up, symptom free at 1 year, limb shortening or deformity, chronic OM or arthritis, amputation or fasciotomy, death, need for paediatric intensive care, and line infection. Oral switch criteria were identified, including resolution of fever for ≥ 48 hours, tolerating oral food and medicines, and pain improvement. LIMITATIONS Data were collected in a 6-month period, which might not have been representative, and follow-up data for long-term complications are limited. CONCLUSIONS A future RCT would need to recruit from all tertiary and most secondary UK hospitals. Clinicians have implemented early oral switch for selected patients with simple disease without formal clinical trial evidence of safety. However, the current criteria by which decisions to make the oral switch are made are not clearly established or evidence based. FUTURE WORK A RCT in simple OM and SA comparing shorter- or longer-course i.v. therapy is feasible in children randomised after oral switch criteria are met after 7 days of i.v. therapy, excluding children meeting oral switch criteria in the first week of i.v. therapy. This study design meets clinician preferences and addresses parental concerns not to randomise prior to oral switch criteria being met. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans de Graaf
- National Institute for Health Research Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.,University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Priya Sukhtankar
- National Institute for Health Research Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.,University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Barbara Arch
- Medicines for Children Clinical Trials Unit, Clinical Trials Research Centre, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Nusreen Ahmad
- National Institute for Health Research Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.,University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.,Public Health England, Southampton, UK
| | - Amanda Lees
- Health and Wellbeing Research and Development Group, University of Winchester, Winchester, UK
| | - Abigail Bennett
- Medicines for Children Clinical Trials Unit, Clinical Trials Research Centre, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Catherine Spowart
- Medicines for Children Clinical Trials Unit, Clinical Trials Research Centre, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Helen Hickey
- Medicines for Children Clinical Trials Unit, Clinical Trials Research Centre, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Annmarie Jeanes
- Radiology, Leeds Children's Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Kate Armon
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | - Andrew Riordan
- Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jethro Herberg
- Section of Paediatrics, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, London, UK
| | - Scott Hackett
- Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Carrol Gamble
- Medicines for Children Clinical Trials Unit, Clinical Trials Research Centre, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Delane Shingadia
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - Ann Pallett
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Stuart C Clarke
- Academic Unit of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Philip Henman
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - Marieke Emonts
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - Mike Sharland
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Adam Finn
- Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Paediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK
| | - Andrew J Pollard
- Department of Paediatrics, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Colin Powell
- School of Medicine, University of Cardiff, Cardiff, UK.,Department of Paediatrics, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Peter Marsh
- Public Health England, South East Public Health England Regional Laboratory, Southampton, UK
| | - Claire Ballinger
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Paula R Williamson
- Medicines for Children Clinical Trials Unit, Clinical Trials Research Centre, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Nicholas Mp Clarke
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.,Paediatric Orthopaedics, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Saul N Faust
- National Institute for Health Research Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.,University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Orthodontic trial outcomes: Plentiful, inconsistent, and in need of uniformity? A scoping review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018; 153:797-807. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.10.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2017] [Revised: 10/01/2017] [Accepted: 10/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
34
|
Hall A, Wills AK, Mahmoud O, Sell D, Waylen A, Grewal S, Sandy JR, Ness AR. Centre-level variation in outcomes and treatment for otitis media with effusion and hearing loss and the association of hearing loss with developmental outcomes at ages 5 and 7 years in children with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate: The Cleft Care UK study. Part 2. Orthod Craniofac Res 2018; 20 Suppl 2:8-18. [PMID: 28661080 DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/09/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore centre-level variation in otitis media with effusion (OME), hearing loss and treatments in children in Cleft Care UK (CCUK) and to examine the association between OME, hearing loss and developmental outcomes at 5 and 7 years. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION Two hundred and sixty-eight 5-year-old British children with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) recruited to CCUK. MATERIALS AND METHODS Children had air and bone conduction audiometry at age 5. Information on grommet and hearing aid treatment was obtained from parental questionnaire and medical notes. Hearing loss at age 5 was defined as >20 dB in the better ear and history of OME and hearing loss was determined from past treatment. Children with sensorineural hearing loss were excluded. Associations were examined with speech, behaviour and self-confidence at age 5 and educational attainment at age 7. Centre variation was examined using hierarchical models and associations between hearing variables and developmental outcomes were examined using logistic regression. RESULTS There was centre-level variation in early grommet placement (variance partition coefficient (VPC) 18%, P=.001) and fitting of hearing aids (VPC 8%, P=.03). A history of OME and hearing loss was associated with poor intelligibility of speech (adjusted odds ratio=2.87, 95% CI 1.42-5.77) and aspects of educational attainment. CONCLUSIONS Hearing loss is an important determinant of poor speech and treatment variation across centres suggest management of OME and hearing loss could be improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Hall
- Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.,Children's Hearing Centre, St Michael's Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - A K Wills
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Unit in Nutrition, Diet and Lifestyle at the University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Bristol Dental School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - O Mahmoud
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Clifton, Bristol, UK.,Department of Applied Statistics, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - D Sell
- North Thames Regional Cleft Service, Speech and Language Therapy Department and Centre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability (ORCHID), Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Waylen
- Bristol Dental School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - S Grewal
- Bristol Dental School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - J R Sandy
- Bristol Dental School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - A R Ness
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Unit in Nutrition, Diet and Lifestyle at the University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Bristol Dental School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Nicholls W, Selvey LA, Harper C, Persson M, Robinson S. The Psychosocial Impact of Cleft in a Western Australian Cohort Across 3 Age Groups. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2018; 56:210-221. [PMID: 29649370 DOI: 10.1177/1055665618769660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of a cleft of the lip and/or palate (CL/P) involves a multidisciplinary team approach lasting from birth to potentially postskeletal maturity. This condition is complex, with both medical and psychosocial implications that may place individuals with a cleft at higher risk of developing psychosocial problems. METHODOLOGY A self-administered questionnaire was completed by a sample from the Western Australian cleft population comprising 3 age groups: child (n = 100), adolescent (n = 101), and adult (n = 158). RESULTS Public speaking, being photographed, special relationships, and participation in school were identified as the areas most impacted by having a cleft. Hearing and speech were reported to have a higher importance than facial and dental appearance. Participants rated support given to them by their parents as the most important, with high ratings for treatment providers. For teasing, the impact of cleft was significantly higher among participants with cleft lip and palate for both the adolescent and adult age groups. There was little significant difference by gender across the variables, which suggests that males are just as likely to require support as females. CONCLUSION The impact of a cleft across multiple psychosocial domains needs to be recognized and addressed as part of craniofacial team care across age groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy Nicholls
- 1 Princess Margaret Hospital Dental/Cleft Lip and Palate Unit, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Linda A Selvey
- 2 Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Craig Harper
- 3 Private Consultancy, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Smith H, Horobin A, Fackrell K, Colley V, Thacker B, Hall DA. Defining and evaluating novel procedures for involving patients in Core Outcome Set research: creating a meaningful long list of candidate outcome domains. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2018; 4:8. [PMID: 29507772 PMCID: PMC5833049 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-018-0091-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2017] [Accepted: 01/08/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
PLAIN ENGLISH SUMMARY Outcome domains are aspects of a condition that matter to patients and clinicians and can be measured to assess treatment effects. For tinnitus, examples include 'tinnitus loudness' and 'ability to concentrate'. This study focuses on the first stage of agreeing which outcome domains should be measured in all clinical trials of tinnitus. Crucially, it involves identifying outcome domains, prior to a voting process. This article describes how we effectively involved patients in that study design process, and reflects on the impact of their input.The study first compiled a long list of all possible outcome domains before asking interested parties, including patients, to vote which ones to include. Ensuring patients fully participate in this process holds unique challenges as it can be long, repetitive and its purpose far removed from their needs. These challenges may be addressed by involving patients in designing the research. There is evidence that other research teams are doing this, but its reporting is not detailed enough to guide others. Our paper seeks to address this.We describe how we involved patients (people living with tinnitus) in creating a long list of outcome domains that we included in our study. We also reflect on the benefits this brought. Two patients partnered with us in designing the survey. We also consulted an independent patient review panel. Involving patients reduced the list of domains included in the survey and made domain names and associated descriptions clearer. Our resulting survey performed well in recruiting and retaining patients as participants. ABSTRACT Background Tinnitus is a complex audiological condition affecting many different domains of everyday life. Clinical trials of tinnitus interventions measure and report those outcome domains inconsistently and this hinders direct comparison between study findings. To address this problem, an ongoing project is developing a Core Outcome Set; an agreed list of outcome domains to be measured and reported in all future trials. Part of this project uses a consensus methodology ('Delphi' survey), whereby all relevant stakeholders identify important and critical outcome domains from a long list of candidates. This article addresses a gap in the patient involvement literature by describing and reflecting on our involvement of patients to create a meaningful long list of candidate outcome domains.Methods Two Public Research Partners with lived experience of tinnitus reviewed an initial list of 124 outcome domains over two face-to-face workshops. With the Study Management Team, they interpreted each candidate outcome domain and generated a plain language description. Following this, the domain names and descriptions underwent an additional lay review by 14 patients and 5 clinical experts, via an online survey platform.Results Insights gained from the workshops and survey feedback prompted substantial, unforeseen modifications to the long list. These included the reduction of the number of outcome domains (from 124 to 66) via the exclusion of broad concepts and consolidation of equivalent domains or domains outside the scope of the study. Reviewers also applied their lived experience of tinnitus to bring clarity and relevance to domain names and plain language descriptions. Four impacts on the Delphi survey were observed: recruitment exceeded the target by 171%, there were equivalent numbers of patient and professional participants (n = 358 and n = 312, respectively), feedback was mostly positive, and retention was high (87%).Conclusions Patient involvement was an integral and transformative step of the study design process. Patient involvement was impactful because the online Delphi survey was successful in recruiting and retaining participants, and there were many comments about a positive participatory experience. Seven general methodological features are highlighted which fit with general principles of good patient involvement. These can benefit other Core Outcome Set developers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harriet Smith
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Ropewalk House, 113 The Ropewalk, Nottingham, NG1 5DU UK
- Otology and Hearing Group, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH UK
| | - Adele Horobin
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Ropewalk House, 113 The Ropewalk, Nottingham, NG1 5DU UK
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queens Medical Centre, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH UK
| | - Kathryn Fackrell
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Ropewalk House, 113 The Ropewalk, Nottingham, NG1 5DU UK
- Otology and Hearing Group, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH UK
| | - Veronica Colley
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Ropewalk House, 113 The Ropewalk, Nottingham, NG1 5DU UK
| | - Brian Thacker
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Ropewalk House, 113 The Ropewalk, Nottingham, NG1 5DU UK
| | - Deborah A. Hall
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Ropewalk House, 113 The Ropewalk, Nottingham, NG1 5DU UK
- Otology and Hearing Group, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH UK
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queens Medical Centre, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH UK
| | - for the Core Outcome Measures in Tinnitus (COMiT) initiative
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Ropewalk House, 113 The Ropewalk, Nottingham, NG1 5DU UK
- Otology and Hearing Group, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH UK
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queens Medical Centre, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Potter BK, Hutton B, Clifford TJ, Pallone N, Smith M, Stockler S, Chakraborty P, Barbeau P, Garritty CM, Pugliese M, Rahman A, Skidmore B, Tessier L, Tingley K, Coyle D, Greenberg CR, Korngut L, MacKenzie A, Mitchell JJ, Nicholls S, Offringa M, Schulze A, Taljaard M. Establishing core outcome sets for phenylketonuria (PKU) and medium-chain Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency in children: study protocol for systematic reviews and Delphi surveys. Trials 2017; 18:603. [PMID: 29258568 PMCID: PMC5735866 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-2327-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2017] [Accepted: 11/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inherited metabolic diseases (IMD) are a large group of rare single-gene disorders that are typically diagnosed early in life. There are important evidence gaps related to the comparative effectiveness of therapies for IMD, which are in part due to challenges in conducting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for rare diseases. Registry-based RCTs present a unique opportunity to address these challenges provided the registries implement standardized collection of outcomes that are important to patients and their caregivers and to clinical providers and healthcare systems. Currently there is no core outcome set (COS) for studies evaluating interventions for paediatric IMD. This protocol outlines a study that will establish COS for each of two relatively common IMD in children, phenylketonuria (PKU) and medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency. METHODS This two-part study is registered with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative. Part 1 includes a rapid review and development of an evidence map to identify a comprehensive listing of outcomes reported in past studies of PKU and MCAD deficiency. The review follows established methods for knowledge synthesis, including a comprehensive search strategy, two stages of screening citations against inclusion/exclusion criteria by two reviewers working independently, and extraction of important data elements from eligible studies, including details of the outcomes collected and outcome measurement instruments. The review findings will inform part 2 of our study, a set of Delphi surveys to establish consensus on the highest priority outcomes for each condition. Healthcare providers, families of children with PKU or MCAD deficiency, and health system decision-makers will be invited to participate in two to three rounds of Delphi surveys. The design of the surveys will involve parents of children with IMD who are part of a family advisory forum. DISCUSSION This protocol is a crucial step in developing the capacity to launch RCTs with meaningful outcomes that address comparative effectiveness questions in the field of paediatric IMD. Such trials will contribute high-quality evidence to inform decision-making by patients and their family members, clinicians, and policy-makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth K. Potter
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Drive, Ottawa, ON K1G 5Z3 Canada
| | - Brian Hutton
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Drive, Ottawa, ON K1G 5Z3 Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Tammy J. Clifford
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Drive, Ottawa, ON K1G 5Z3 Canada
- Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Nicole Pallone
- Patient/family partner and Canadian PKU & Allied Disorders Inc, Sparwood, BC Canada
| | - Maureen Smith
- Patient/family partner and Canadian Organization for Rare Disorders, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Sylvia Stockler
- BC Children’s Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada
| | - Pranesh Chakraborty
- Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | | | | | - Michael Pugliese
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Drive, Ottawa, ON K1G 5Z3 Canada
| | - Alvi Rahman
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Drive, Ottawa, ON K1G 5Z3 Canada
| | | | - Laure Tessier
- Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Kylie Tingley
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Drive, Ottawa, ON K1G 5Z3 Canada
| | - Doug Coyle
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Drive, Ottawa, ON K1G 5Z3 Canada
| | | | - Lawrence Korngut
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB Canada
| | - Alex MacKenzie
- Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | | | - Stuart Nicholls
- Clinical Research Unit, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON Canada
- Ontario Child Health SUPPORT Unit (OCHSU), Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Martin Offringa
- Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Andreas Schulze
- Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Monica Taljaard
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Drive, Ottawa, ON K1G 5Z3 Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - In collaboration with the Canadian Inherited Metabolic Diseases Research Network
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Drive, Ottawa, ON K1G 5Z3 Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON Canada
- Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, Ottawa, ON Canada
- Patient/family partner and Canadian PKU & Allied Disorders Inc, Sparwood, BC Canada
- Patient/family partner and Canadian Organization for Rare Disorders, Ottawa, ON Canada
- BC Children’s Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada
- Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON Canada
- University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB Canada
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB Canada
- McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC Canada
- Clinical Research Unit, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON Canada
- Ontario Child Health SUPPORT Unit (OCHSU), Ottawa, ON Canada
- Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Gan RWC, Daniel M, Ridley M, Barry JG. Quality of questionnaires for the assessment of otitis media with effusion in children. Clin Otolaryngol 2017; 43:572-583. [PMID: 29106777 DOI: 10.1111/coa.13026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Audiometric tests provide information about hearing in otitis media with effusion (OME). Questionnaires can supplement this information by supporting clinical history-taking as well as potentially providing a standardized and comprehensive assessment of the impact of the disease on a child. There are many possible candidate questionnaires. This study aimed to assess the quality and usability of parent / child questionnaires in OME assessment. DESIGN AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Fifteen, published questionnaires, commonly used in audiological departments (Auditory Behaviour in Everyday Life (ABEL), Children's Auditory Performance Scale (CHAPS), Children's Home Inventory for Listening Difficulties (CHILD), Children's Outcome Worksheets (COW), Evaluation of Children's Listening and Processing Skills (ECLiPS), Early Listening Function (ELF), Fisher's Auditory Problem Checklist (FAPC), Hearing Loss 7 (HL-7), Listening Inventory for Education- Revised (LIFE-R Student), Listening Inventory for Education UK Individual Hearing Profile (LIFE-UK IHP), LittlEARS Auditory Questionnaire (LittlEARS), Listening Situations Questionnaire (LSQ), Otitis Media 6 (OM-6), Quality of Life in Children's Ear Problems (OMQ-14), Parents' Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children (PEACH) were assessed according to the following 8 criteria: conceptual clarity, respondent burden, reliability, validity, normative data, item bias, ceiling/ floor effects, and administrative burden. RESULTS ECLiPS, LittlEARS and PEACH scored highest overall based on the assessment criteria established for this study. None of the questionnaires fully satisfied all 8 criteria. Although all questionnaires assessed issues considered to be of at least adequate relevance to OME, the majority had weaknesses with respect to the assessment of psychometric properties, such as item bias, floor/ceiling effects or measurement reliability and validity. Publications reporting on the evaluation of reliability, validity, normative data, item bias and ceiling/floor effects were not available for most of the questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS This formal evaluation of questionnaires, currently available to clinicians, highlights three questionnaires as potentially offering a useful adjunct in the assessment of OME in clinical or research settings. These were the ECLiPS, which is suitable for children aged 6 years and older, and either the LittlEARS or the PEACH for younger children. The latter two are narrowly focused on hearing, whereas ECLiPS has a broader focus on listening, language and social difficulties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R W C Gan
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - M Daniel
- ENT Department, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK
| | - M Ridley
- Medical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - J G Barry
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.,Medical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
MacLennan S, Williamson PR, Bekema H, Campbell M, Ramsay C, N'Dow J, MacLennan S, Vale L, Dahm P, Mottet N, Lam T. A core outcome set for localised prostate cancer effectiveness trials. BJU Int 2017; 120:E64-E79. [PMID: 28346770 DOI: 10.1111/bju.13854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop a core outcome set (COS) applicable for effectiveness trials of all interventions for localised prostate cancer. Many treatments exist for localised prostate cancer, although it is unclear which offers the optimal therapeutic ratio; which is confounded by inconsistencies in the selection, definition, measurement and reporting of outcomes in clinical trials. PATIENTS, SUBJECTS AND METHODS A list of 79 outcomes was derived from a systematic review of published localised prostate cancer effectiveness studies and semi-structured interviews with 15 patients with prostate cancer patients. A two-stage consensus process involving 118 patients and 56 international healthcare professionals (HCPs; cancer specialist nurses, urological surgeons and oncologists) was undertaken, consisting of a three-round Delphi survey followed by a face-to-face consensus panel meeting of 13 HCPs and eight patients. RESULTS The final COS included 19 outcomes. In all, 12 apply to all interventions: death from prostate cancer, death from any cause, local disease recurrence, distant disease recurrence/metastases, disease progression, need for salvage therapy, overall quality of life, stress urinary incontinence, urinary function, bowel function, faecal incontinence, and sexual function. Seven were intervention-specific: perioperative deaths (surgery), positive surgical margin (surgery), thromboembolic disease (surgery), bothersome or symptomatic urethral or anastomotic stricture (surgery), need for curative treatment (active surveillance), treatment failure (ablative therapy), and side-effects of hormonal therapy (hormone therapy). The UK-centric participants may limit the generalisability to other countries, but trialists should reason why the COS would not be applicable. The default position should not be that a COS developed in one country will automatically not be applicable elsewhere. CONCLUSION We have established a COS for trials of effectiveness in localised prostate cancer, applicable across all interventions that should be measured in all localised prostate cancer effectiveness trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Hanneke Bekema
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Marion Campbell
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Craig Ramsay
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - James N'Dow
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
- Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Sara MacLennan
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Luke Vale
- Health Economics Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, UK
| | - Philipp Dahm
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Nicolas Mottet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, St. Etienne, France
| | - Thomas Lam
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
- Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Tsichlaki A, O'Brien K, Johal A, Marshman Z, Benson P, Colonio Salazar FB, Fleming PS. Development of a core outcome set for orthodontic trials using a mixed-methods approach: protocol for a multicentre study. Trials 2017; 18:366. [PMID: 28778170 PMCID: PMC5545003 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-2098-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2017] [Accepted: 07/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Orthodontic treatment is commonly undertaken in young people, with over 40% of children in the UK needing treatment and currently one third having treatment, at a cost to the National Health Service in England and Wales of £273 million each year. Most current research about orthodontic care does not consider what patients truly feel about, or want, from treatment, and a diverse range of outcomes is being used with little consistency between studies. This study aims to address these problems, using established methodology to develop a core outcome set for use in future clinical trials of orthodontic interventions in children and young people. Methods/design This is a mixed-methods study incorporating four distinct stages. The first stage will include a scoping review of the scientific literature to identify primary and secondary outcome measures that have been used in previous orthodontic clinical trials. The second stage will involve qualitative interviews and focus groups with orthodontic patients aged 10 to 16 years to determine what outcomes are important to them. The outcomes elicited from these two stages will inform the third stage of the study in which a long-list of outcomes will be ranked in terms of importance using electronic Delphi surveys involving clinicians and patients. The final stage of the study will involve face-to-face consensus meetings with all stakeholders to discuss and agree on the outcome measures that should be included in the final core outcome set. Discussion This research will help to inform patients, parents, clinicians and commissioners about outcomes that are important to young people undergoing orthodontic treatment. Adoption of the core outcome set in future clinical trials of orthodontic treatment will make it easier for results to be compared, contrasted and combined. This should translate into improved decision-making by all stakeholders involved. Trial registration The project has been registered on the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) website, January 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aliki Tsichlaki
- Department of Orthodontics, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 1BB, UK.
| | - Kevin O'Brien
- Division of Dentistry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Ama Johal
- Department of Orthodontics, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 1BB, UK
| | - Zoe Marshman
- School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Claremont Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2TA, UK
| | - Philip Benson
- School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Claremont Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2TA, UK
| | - Fiorella B Colonio Salazar
- Department of Orthodontics, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 1BB, UK.,King's College London Dental Institute, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Padhraig S Fleming
- Department of Orthodontics, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 1BB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Williamson PR, Altman DG, Bagley H, Barnes KL, Blazeby JM, Brookes ST, Clarke M, Gargon E, Gorst S, Harman N, Kirkham JJ, McNair A, Prinsen CAC, Schmitt J, Terwee CB, Young B. The COMET Handbook: version 1.0. Trials 2017; 18:280. [PMID: 28681707 PMCID: PMC5499094 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-1978-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1066] [Impact Index Per Article: 152.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The selection of appropriate outcomes is crucial when designing clinical trials in order to compare the effects of different interventions directly. For the findings to influence policy and practice, the outcomes need to be relevant and important to key stakeholders including patients and the public, health care professionals and others making decisions about health care. It is now widely acknowledged that insufficient attention has been paid to the choice of outcomes measured in clinical trials. Researchers are increasingly addressing this issue through the development and use of a core outcome set, an agreed standardised collection of outcomes which should be measured and reported, as a minimum, in all trials for a specific clinical area.Accumulating work in this area has identified the need for guidance on the development, implementation, evaluation and updating of core outcome sets. This Handbook, developed by the COMET Initiative, brings together current thinking and methodological research regarding those issues. We recommend a four-step process to develop a core outcome set. The aim is to update the contents of the Handbook as further research is identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula R. Williamson
- MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Block F Waterhouse Building, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL UK
| | - Douglas G. Altman
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Heather Bagley
- MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Block F Waterhouse Building, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL UK
| | - Karen L. Barnes
- MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Block F Waterhouse Building, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL UK
| | - Jane M. Blazeby
- MRC ConDuCT II Hub for Trials Methodology Research, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sara T. Brookes
- MRC ConDuCT II Hub for Trials Methodology Research, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Mike Clarke
- Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
- National University of Ireland Galway and HRB Trials Methodology Research Network, Galway, Ireland
| | - Elizabeth Gargon
- MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Block F Waterhouse Building, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL UK
| | - Sarah Gorst
- MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Block F Waterhouse Building, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL UK
| | - Nicola Harman
- MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Block F Waterhouse Building, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL UK
| | - Jamie J. Kirkham
- MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Block F Waterhouse Building, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL UK
| | - Angus McNair
- MRC ConDuCT II Hub for Trials Methodology Research, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Cecilia A. C. Prinsen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jochen Schmitt
- Center for Evidence-based Healthcare, Medizinische Fakultät, Technische Univesität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Caroline B. Terwee
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bridget Young
- MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Block F Waterhouse Building, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Payne K, Davison N, Thompson AJ, O'Brien K, Bruce IA. Use of a structured elicitation exercise to estimate the prevalence of OME in children with cleft palate. Clin Otolaryngol 2016; 42:904-907. [PMID: 27743503 DOI: 10.1111/coa.12771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- K Payne
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - N Davison
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - A J Thompson
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - K O'Brien
- School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - I A Bruce
- Royal Manchester Children's Hospital and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Kloukos D, Fudalej P, Sequeira‐Byron P, Katsaros C. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 9:CD010403. [PMID: 27689965 PMCID: PMC6452788 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010403.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cleft lip and palate is one of the most common birth defects and can cause difficulties with feeding, speech and hearing, as well as psychosocial problems. Treatment of orofacial clefts is prolonged; it typically commences after birth and lasts until the child reaches adulthood or even into adulthood. Residual deformities, functional disturbances, or both, are frequently seen in adults with a repaired cleft. Conventional orthognathic surgery, such as Le Fort I osteotomy, is often performed for the correction of maxillary hypoplasia. An alternative intervention is distraction osteogenesis, which achieves bone lengthening by gradual mechanical distraction. OBJECTIVES To provide evidence regarding the effects and long-term results of maxillary distraction osteogenesis compared to orthognathic surgery for the treatment of hypoplastic maxilla in people with cleft lip and palate. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following electronic databases: Cochrane Oral Health's Trials Register (to 16 February 2016), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (the Cochrane Library, 2016, Issue 1), MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to 16 February 2016), Embase Ovid (1980 to 16 February 2016), LILACS BIREME (1982 to 16 February 2016), the US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register (ClinicalTrials.gov) (to 16 February 2016), and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (to 16 February 2016). There were no restrictions regarding language or date of publication in the electronic searches. We performed handsearching of six speciality journals and we checked the reference lists of all trials identified for further studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing maxillary distraction osteogenesis to conventional Le Fort I osteotomy for the correction of cleft lip and palate maxillary hypoplasia in non-syndromic cleft patients aged 15 years or older. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors assessed studies for eligibility. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the included studies. We contacted trial authors for clarification or missing information whenever possible. All standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane were used. MAIN RESULTS We found six publications involving a total of 47 participants requiring maxillary advancement of 4 mm to 10 mm. All of them related to a single trial performed between 2002 and 2008 at the University of Hong Kong, but not all of the publications reported outcomes from all 47 participants. The study compared maxillary distraction osteogenesis with orthognathic surgery, and included participants from 13 to 45 years of age.Results and conclusions should be interpreted with caution given the fact that this was a single trial at high risk of bias, with a small sample size.The main outcomes assessed were hard and soft tissue changes, skeletal relapse, effects on speech and velopharyngeal function, psychological status, and clinical morbidities.Both interventions produced notable hard and soft tissue improvements. Nevertheless, the distraction group demonstrated a greater maxillary advancement, evaluated as the advancement of Subspinale A-point: a mean difference of 4.40 mm (95% CI 0.24 to 8.56) was recorded two years postoperatively.Horizontal relapse of the maxilla was significantly less in the distraction osteogenesis group five years after surgery. A total forward movement of A-point of 2.27 mm was noted for the distraction group, whereas a backward movement of 2.53 mm was recorded for the osteotomy group (mean difference 4.8 mm, 95% CI 0.41 to 9.19).No statistically significant differences could be detected between the groups in speech outcomes, when evaluated through resonance (hypernasality) at 17 months postoperatively (RR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.85) and nasal emissions at 17 months postoperatively (RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.14 to 66.53), or in velopharyngeal function at the same time point (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.52).Maxillary distraction initially lowered social self-esteem at least until the distractors were removed, at three months postoperatively, compared to the osteotomy group, but this improved over time and the distraction group had higher satisfaction with life in the long term (two years after surgery) (MD 2.95, 95% CI 014 to 5.76).Adverse effects, in terms of clinical morbidities, included mainly occlusal relapse and mucosal infection, with the frequency being similar between groups (3/15 participants in the distraction osteogenesis group and 3/14 participants in the osteotomy group). There was no severe harm to any participant. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This review found only one small randomised controlled trial concerning the effectiveness of distraction osteogenesis compared to conventional orthognathic surgery. The available evidence is of very low quality, which indicates that further research is likely to change the estimate of the effect. Based on measured outcomes, distraction osteogenesis may produce more satisfactory results; however, further prospective research comprising assessment of a larger sample size with participants with different facial characteristics is required to confirm possible true differences between interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Kloukos
- University of BernDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, School of Dental MedicineFreiburgstrasse 7BernSwitzerland3010
| | | | - Patrick Sequeira‐Byron
- University of BernDepartment of Preventive, Restorative and Pediatric DentistryFreiburgstrasse 7BernSwitzerlandCH‐3010
| | - Christos Katsaros
- University of BernDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsFreiburgstr. 7BernSwitzerlandCH‐3010
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Keeley T, Williamson P, Callery P, Jones LL, Mathers J, Jones J, Young B, Calvert M. The use of qualitative methods to inform Delphi surveys in core outcome set development. Trials 2016; 17:230. [PMID: 27142835 PMCID: PMC4855446 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1356-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2015] [Accepted: 04/22/2016] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Core outcome sets (COS) help to minimise bias in trials and facilitate evidence synthesis. Delphi surveys are increasingly being used as part of a wider process to reach consensus about what outcomes should be included in a COS. Qualitative research can be used to inform the development of Delphi surveys. This is an advance in the field of COS development and one which is potentially valuable; however, little guidance exists for COS developers on how best to use qualitative methods and what the challenges are. This paper aims to provide early guidance on the potential role and contribution of qualitative research in this area. We hope the ideas we present will be challenged, critiqued and built upon by others exploring the role of qualitative research in COS development. This paper draws upon the experiences of using qualitative methods in the pre-Delphi stage of the development of three different COS. Using these studies as examples, we identify some of the ways that qualitative research might contribute to COS development, the challenges in using such methods and areas where future research is required. Results Qualitative research can help to identify what outcomes are important to stakeholders; facilitate understanding of why some outcomes may be more important than others, determine the scope of outcomes; identify appropriate language for use in the Delphi survey and inform comparisons between stakeholder data and other sources, such as systematic reviews. Developers need to consider a number of methodological points when using qualitative research: specifically, which stakeholders to involve, how to sample participants, which data collection methods are most appropriate, how to consider outcomes with stakeholders and how to analyse these data. A number of areas for future research are identified. Conclusions Qualitative research has the potential to increase the research community’s confidence in COS, although this will be dependent upon using rigorous and appropriate methodology. We have begun to identify some issues for COS developers to consider in using qualitative methods to inform the development of Delphi surveys in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Keeley
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England.
| | - P Williamson
- Department of Biostatistics, MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, England
| | - P Callery
- Midwifery and Social Work, School of Nursing, University of Manchester, Manchester, England
| | - L L Jones
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England
| | - J Mathers
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England
| | - J Jones
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England
| | - B Young
- Department of Psychological Sciences and MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, England
| | - M Calvert
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
MacLennan S, Bekema HJ, Williamson PR, Campbell MK, Stewart F, MacLennan SJ, N'Dow JMO, Lam TBL. A core outcome set for localised prostate cancer effectiveness trials: protocol for a systematic review of the literature and stakeholder involvement through interviews and a Delphi survey. Trials 2015; 16:76. [PMID: 25887437 PMCID: PMC4355995 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0598-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2014] [Accepted: 02/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Prostate cancer is a growing health problem worldwide. The management of localised prostate cancer is controversial. It is unclear which of several surgical, radiotherapeutic, ablative, and surveillance treatments is the most effective. All have cost, process and recovery, and morbidity implications which add to treatment decision-making complexity for patients and healthcare professionals. Evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not optimal because of uncertainty as to what constitutes important outcomes. Another issue hampering evidence synthesis is heterogeneity of outcome definition, measurement, and reporting. This project aims to determine which outcomes are the most important to patients and healthcare professionals, and use these findings to recommend a standardised core outcome set for comparative effectiveness trials of treatments for localised prostate cancer, to optimise decision-making. Methods/Design The range of potentially important outcomes and measures will be identified through systematic reviews of the literature and semi-structured interviews with patients. A consultation exercise involving representatives from two key stakeholder groups (patients and healthcare professionals) will ratify the list of outcomes to be entered into a three round Delphi study. The Delphi process will refine and prioritise the list of identified outcomes. A methodological substudy (nested RCT design) will also be undertaken. Participants will be randomised after round one of the Delphi study to one of three feedback groups, based on different feedback strategies, in order to explore the potential impact of feedback strategies on participant responses. This may assist the design of a future core outcome set and Delphi studies. Following the Delphi study, a final consensus meeting attended by representatives from both stakeholder groups will determine the final recommended core outcome set. Discussion This study will inform clinical practice and future trials of interventions of localised prostate cancer by standardising a core outcome set which should be considered in comparative effectiveness studies for localised prostate cancer. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0598-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven MacLennan
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Cornhill Road, Aberdeen, UK, AB25 2ZD.
| | - Hendrika J Bekema
- Department of Critical Care, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzleplein, Groningen, The Netherlands, 9700 RB.
| | - Paula R Williamson
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool, UK, L69 3BX.
| | - Marion K Campbell
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Cornhill Road, Aberdeen, UK, AB25 2ZD.
| | - Fiona Stewart
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Cornhill Road, Aberdeen, UK, AB25 2ZD.
| | - Sara J MacLennan
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Cornhill Road, Aberdeen, UK, AB25 2ZD.
| | - James M O N'Dow
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Cornhill Road, Aberdeen, UK, AB25 2ZD. .,Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Foresterhill Road, Aberdeen, UK, AB25 2ZD.
| | - Thomas B L Lam
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Cornhill Road, Aberdeen, UK, AB25 2ZD. .,Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Foresterhill Road, Aberdeen, UK, AB25 2ZD.
| |
Collapse
|