1
|
Rana D, Westrop S, Jaiswal N, Germeni E, McGarty A, Ells L, Lally P, McEwan M, Melville C, Harris L, Wu O. Lifestyle modification interventions for adults with intellectual disabilities: systematic review and meta-analysis at intervention and component levels. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH : JIDR 2024; 68:387-445. [PMID: 38414293 DOI: 10.1111/jir.13098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adults with intellectual disabilities (IDs) are susceptible to multiple health risk behaviours such as alcohol consumption, smoking, low physical activity, sedentary behaviour and poor diet. Lifestyle modification interventions can prevent or reduce negative health consequences caused by these behaviours. We aim to determine the effectiveness of lifestyle modification interventions and their components in targeting health risk behaviours in adults with IDs. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. Electronic databases, clinical trial registries, grey literature and citations of systematic reviews and included studies were searched in January 2021 (updated February 2022). Randomised controlled trials and non-randomised controlled trials targeting alcohol consumption, smoking, low physical activity, sedentary behaviours and poor diet in adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with ID were included. Meta-analysis was conducted at the intervention level (pairwise and network meta-analysis) and the component-level (component network meta-analysis). Studies were coded using Michie's 19-item theory coding scheme and 94-item behaviour change taxonomies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (ROB) Version 2 and Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I). The study involved a patient and public involvement (PPI) group, including people with lived experience, who contributed extensively by shaping the methodology, providing valuable insights in interpreting results and organising of dissemination events. RESULTS Our literature search identified 12 180 articles, of which 80 studies with 4805 participants were included in the review. The complexity of lifestyle modification intervention was dismantled by identifying six core components that influenced outcomes. Interventions targeting single or multiple health risk behaviours could have a single or combination of multiple core-components. Interventions (2 RCTS; 4 non-RCTs; 228 participants) targeting alcohol consumption and smoking behaviour were effective but based on limited evidence. Similarly, interventions targeting low physical activity only (16 RCTs; 17 non-RCTs; 1413 participants) or multiple behaviours (low physical activity only, sedentary behaviours and poor diet) (17 RCTs; 24 non-RCTs; 3164 participants) yielded mixed effectiveness in outcomes. Most interventions targeting low physical activity only or multiple behaviours generated positive effects on various outcomes while some interventions led to no change or worsened outcomes, which could be attributed to the presence of a single core-component or a combination of similar core components in interventions. The intervention-level meta-analysis for weight management outcomes showed that none of the interventions were associated with a statistically significant change in outcomes when compared with treatment-as-usual and each other. Interventions with core-components combination of energy deficit diet, aerobic exercise and behaviour change techniques showed the highest weight loss [mean difference (MD) = -3.61, 95% credible interval (CrI) -9.68 to 1.95] and those with core-components combination dietary advice and aerobic exercise showed a weight gain (MD 0.94, 95% CrI -3.93 to 4.91). Similar findings were found with the component network meta-analysis for which additional components were identified. Most studies had a high and moderate risk of bias. Various theories and behaviour change techniques were used in intervention development and adaptation. CONCLUSION Our systematic review is the first to comprehensively explore lifestyle modification interventions targeting a range of single and multiple health risk behaviours in adults with ID, co-produced with people with lived experience. It has practical implications for future research as it highlights the importance of mixed-methods research in understanding lifestyle modification interventions and the need for population-specific improvements in the field (e.g., tailored interventions, development of evaluation instruments or tools, use of rigorous research methodologies and comprehensive reporting frameworks). Wide dissemination of related knowledge and the involvement of PPI groups, including people with lived experience, will help future researchers design interventions that consider the unique needs, desires and abilities of people with ID.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Rana
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - S Westrop
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
- Mental Health and Wellbeing, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - N Jaiswal
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - E Germeni
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - A McGarty
- Mental Health and Wellbeing, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - L Ells
- School of Clinical and Applied Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| | - P Lally
- UCL Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - M McEwan
- People First (Scotland), Edinburgh, UK
| | - C Melville
- Mental Health and Wellbeing, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - L Harris
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - O Wu
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
O'Dwyer JL, Bryant LD, Hulme C, Kind P, Meads DM. Adapting the EQ-5D-3L for adults with mild to moderate learning disabilities. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2024; 22:37. [PMID: 38685039 PMCID: PMC11059748 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-024-02254-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 1.5 million adults in the UK have a learning disability. The difference between age at death for this group and the general population is 26 years for females and 22 years for males. The NHS Long Term Plan (January 2019) recognises learning disabilities as a clinical priority area. People with a learning disability are often excluded from research by design or lack of reasonable adjustments, and self-reported health status/health-related quality of life questionnaires such as the EQ-5D are often not appropriate for this population. Here, we systematically examine the EQ-5D-3L (its wording, content, and format) using qualitative methods to inform the adaption of the measure for use with adults with mild to moderate learning disabilities. METHODS Think-aloud interviews with carers/advocates of learning-disabled adults were undertaken to explore the difficulties with completing the EQ-5D-3L. Alternative wording, language, structure, and images were developed using focus groups, stakeholder reference groups, and an expert panel. Data analysis followed a framework method. RESULTS The dimensions and levels within the EQ-5D-3L were deemed appropriate for adults with mild to moderate learning disabilities. Consensus on wording, structure, and images was reached through an iterative process, and an adapted version of the EQ-5D-3L was finalised. CONCLUSION The EQ-5D-3L adapted for adults with mild to moderate intellectual/learning disabilities can facilitate measurement of self-reported health status. Research is underway to assess the potential use of the adaptation for economic evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John L O'Dwyer
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.
| | - Louise D Bryant
- Division of Psychological & Social Medicine, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Claire Hulme
- Department of Health & Community Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Paul Kind
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - David M Meads
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Westrop SC, Rana D, Jaiswal N, Wu O, McGarty AM, Melville C, Ells L, Lally P, McEwan M, Harris L, Germeni E. Supporting active engagement of adults with intellectual disabilities in lifestyle modification interventions: a realist evidence synthesis of what works, for whom, in what context and why. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH : JIDR 2024; 68:293-316. [PMID: 38379511 DOI: 10.1111/jir.13120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lifestyle modification interventions for adults with intellectual disabilities have had, to date, mixed effectiveness. This study aimed to understand how lifestyle modification interventions for adults with intellectual disabilities work, for whom they work and in what circumstances. METHODS A realist evidence synthesis was conducted that incorporated input from adults with intellectual disabilities and expert researchers. Following the development of an initial programme theory based on key literature and input from people with lived experience and academics working in this field, five major databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and ASSIA) and clinical trial repositories were systematically searched. Data from 79 studies were synthesised to develop context, mechanism and outcome configurations (CMOCs). RESULTS The contexts and mechanisms identified related to the ability of adults with intellectual disabilities to actively take part in the intervention, which in turn contributes to what works, for whom and in what circumstances. The included CMOCs related to support involvement, negotiating the balance between autonomy and behaviour change, fostering social connectedness and fun, accessibility and suitability of intervention strategies and delivery and broader behavioural pathways to lifestyle change. It is also essential to work with people with lived experiences when developing and evaluating interventions. CONCLUSIONS Future lifestyle interventions research should be participatory in nature, and accessible data collection methods should also be explored as a way of including people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities in research. More emphasis should be given to the broader benefits of lifestyle change, such as opportunities for social interaction and connectedness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S C Westrop
- Mental Health and Wellbeing, School of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - D Rana
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - N Jaiswal
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - O Wu
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - A M McGarty
- Mental Health and Wellbeing, School of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - C Melville
- Mental Health and Wellbeing, School of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - L Ells
- Obesity Institute, School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, City Campus, Leeds, UK
| | - P Lally
- UCL Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - M McEwan
- People First (Scotland), Edinburgh, UK
| | - L Harris
- School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - E Germeni
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Russell AM. Breaking the cycle of inequalities for people with a learning disability. Br J Gen Pract 2022; 72:510-511. [PMID: 36302686 PMCID: PMC9591097 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp22x720953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Amy M Russell
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Petersen B, Vesper I, Pachwald B, Dagenbach N, Buck S, Waldenmaier D, Heinemann L. Diabetes management intervention studies: lessons learned from two studies. Trials 2021; 22:61. [PMID: 33461624 PMCID: PMC7812736 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-05017-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Several clinical studies investigated improvements of patient outcomes due to diabetes management interventions. However, chronic disease management is intricate with complex multifactorial behavior patterns. Such studies thus have to be well designed in order to allocate all observed effects to the defined intervention and to exclude effects of other confounders as well as possible. This article aims to provide challenges in interpreting diabetes management intervention studies and suggests approaches for optimizing study implementation and for avoiding pitfalls based on current experiences. Main body Lessons from the STeP and ProValue studies demonstrated the difficulty in medical device studies that rely on behavioral changes in intervention group patients. To successfully engage patients, priority should be given to health care professionals being engaged, operational support in technical issues being available, and adherence being assessed in detail. Another difficulty is to avoid contamination of the control group with the intervention; therefore, strict allocation concealment should be maintained. However, randomization and blinding are not always possible. A limited effect size due to improvements regarding clinical endpoints in the control group is often caused by the Hawthorne effect. Improvements in the control group can also be caused with increased attention paid to the subjects. In order to reduce improvements in the control group, it is essential to identify the specific reasons and adjust study procedures accordingly. A pilot phase is indispensable for this. Another option is to include a third study arm to control for enhanced standard of care and study effects. Furthermore, retrospective data collection could be a feasible option. Adaptive study designs might reduce the necessity of a separate pilot study and combine the exploratory and confirmatory stages of an investigation in one single study. Conclusion There are several aspects to consider in medical device studies when using interventions that rely on changes in behavior to achieve an effective implementation and significant study results. Improvements in the control group may reduce effect sizes and limit statistical significance; therefore, alternatives to the traditional randomized controlled trials may be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Sina Buck
- Institut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Lise-Meitner-Strasse 8/2, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
| | - Delia Waldenmaier
- Institut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Lise-Meitner-Strasse 8/2, 89081, Ulm, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tanirbergenova A, Kamaliev M, Akanov Z, Igissenova A. Analysis of Disability due to Diabetes Mellitus in a Large City. ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE 2020. [DOI: 10.29333/ejgm/9347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
7
|
Tyrer F, Ling S, Bhaumik S, Gangadharan SK, Khunti K, Gray LJ, Dunkley AJ. Diabetes in adults with intellectual disability: prevalence and associated demographic, lifestyle, independence and health factors. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH : JIDR 2020; 64:287-295. [PMID: 31976599 DOI: 10.1111/jir.12718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2019] [Revised: 10/01/2019] [Accepted: 01/13/2020] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As people with intellectual disabilities (ID) are now living longer, they are more at risk of developing non-communicable diseases, including type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, understanding of factors associated with diabetes for targeted management and prevention strategies is limited. This study aimed to investigate prevalence of diabetes in adults (aged ≥18 years) with ID and its relationship with demographic, lifestyle, independence and health factors. METHOD This was a cross-sectional analysis of interview data from 1091 adults with ID from the Leicestershire Learning Disability Register from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2016. Logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with diabetes in the study population. RESULTS The study population did not have healthy lifestyles: just under half reported having lower physical activity levels than people without ID of a similar age; one-quarter consumed fizzy drinks daily; and 20% consumed five or more fruit and/or vegetables per day. Prevalence of carer/self-reported diabetes was 7.3% (95% confidence interval 5.9-9.0). After adjustment, diabetes was positively associated with South Asian ethnicity (P = 0.03) and older age groups (P < 0.001). Diabetes was less common in people living with family members (P = 0.02). We did not find a relationship between any of the lifestyle, independence and health factors investigated. CONCLUSIONS A significant proportion of people with ID are living with diabetes. Diabetes management and prevention strategies should be tailored to individuals' complex needs and include consideration of lifestyle choices. Such strategies may want to focus on adults of South Asian ethnicity and people living in residential homes where prevalence appears to be higher.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Tyrer
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - S Ling
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - S Bhaumik
- Learning Disability Services, Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - S K Gangadharan
- Learning Disability Services, Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - K Khunti
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - L J Gray
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - A J Dunkley
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Russell AM, O'Dwyer JL, Bryant LD, House AO, Birtwistle JC, Meer S, Wright-Hughes A, Walwyn REA, Graham E, Farrin AJ, Hulme CT. The feasibility of using the EQ-5D-3L with adults with mild to moderate learning disabilities within a randomized control trial: a qualitative evaluation. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2018; 4:164. [PMID: 30397508 PMCID: PMC6205783 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-018-0357-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2018] [Accepted: 10/15/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In trials incorporating a health economic evaluation component, reliable validated measures for health-related quality of life (HRQOL) are essential. The EQ-5D is the preferred measure for cost-effectiveness analysis in UK trials. This paper presents a qualitative evaluation of the use of the EQ-5D-3L in a feasibility randomised control trial with participants who had a mild- to moderate learning disability and type 2 diabetes. Methods Researchers administered the EQ-5D-3L to 82 participants at baseline and 77 at follow-up. After each interview, researchers rated the ease of administering the EQ-5D-3L and made free-text entries on the administration experience. For a subset of 16 interviews, researchers audio-recorded more detailed journal entries. Ease of administration data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Free-text responses were subject to a basic content analysis. The EQ-5D-3L-related journal entries were transcribed, coded and analysed thematically. Results Over half of participants were perceived to experience difficulty answering some or all of the items in the EQ-5D-3L (60% at baseline; 54% at follow-up). Analysis of the free-text entries and audio journals identified four themes that question the use of the EQ-5D-3L in this population. The first theme is related to observations of participant intellectual ability and difficulties, for example, in understanding the wording of the measure. Theme 2 is related to the normalisation of adjustments for impairments, which rendered the measure less sensitive in this population. Theme 3 is related to researcher adaptation and non-standard administration. An overarching fourth theme was identified in that people with learning disabilities were viewed as ‘unreliable witnesses’ by both researchers and supporters. Conclusions It is recommended that the EQ-5D-3L should not be used in isolation to assess health-related quality of life outcomes in trials research in adults with a learning disability. Further research is required to develop and evaluate a version of the EQ-5D appropriate for this population in trials research. It is unrealistic to expect that adjustments to the wording alone will deliver an appropriate measure: supporter or researcher involvement will almost always be required. This requirement needs to be factored into the development and administration guidelines of any new version of the EQ-5D for adults with a learning disability. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN41897033 [registered 21 January 2013]. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s40814-018-0357-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M Russell
- 1Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - J L O'Dwyer
- 1Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - L D Bryant
- 1Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - A O House
- 1Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - J C Birtwistle
- 1Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - S Meer
- 1Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - A Wright-Hughes
- 1Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - R E A Walwyn
- 1Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - E Graham
- 1Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - A J Farrin
- 2Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - C T Hulme
- 1Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Taggart L, Truesdale M, Dunkley A, House A, Russell AM. Health Promotion and Wellness Initiatives Targeting Chronic Disease Prevention and Management for Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: Recent Advancements in Type 2 Diabetes. CURRENT DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS REPORTS 2018; 5:132-142. [PMID: 30148038 PMCID: PMC6096852 DOI: 10.1007/s40474-018-0142-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The aim of this paper was to review the recent international developments in health promotion and wellness initiatives targeting chronic disease prevention and management for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) targeting type 2 diabetes (T2D). RECENT FINDINGS There has been one diabetes prevention program (STOP) and two self-management T2D education programs (DESMOND-ID; OK diabetes) adapted for this population. All three programs have been adapted from other theoretically informed and tested programs developed for the general population. Each program has employed co-design and co-production techniques with all stakeholders. The three programs all target the high-risk lifestyle factors that can lead to T2D and contribute to poor glycaemia control, and have undertaken randomized-feasibility studies, the results of which are promising. SUMMARY This paper shows that any health promotion and wellness initiatives need to be tailored and reasonable adjustments made in order to address this population's cognitive impairments and communication difficulties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. Taggart
- Institute of Nursing & Health Research, Ulster University, Room 12J19, Shore Road, Newtownabbey, Co Antrim BT37 0QB Northern Ireland
| | - M. Truesdale
- School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - A. Dunkley
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, England
| | - A. House
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - A. M. Russell
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
House A, Bryant L, Russell AM, Wright‐Hughes A, Graham L, Walwyn R, Wright JM, Hulme C, O'Dwyer JL, Latchford G, Stansfield A, Ajjan R, Farrin A. Randomized controlled feasibility trial of supported self-management in adults with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and an intellectual disability: OK Diabetes. Diabet Med 2018; 35:776-788. [PMID: 29575241 PMCID: PMC5969288 DOI: 10.1111/dme.13626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/13/2018] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To undertake a feasibility randomized controlled trial of supported self-management vs treatment as usual in a population of adults with obesity, Type 2 diabetes and an intellectual disability. METHODS We conducted an individually randomized feasibility trial. Participants were adults aged >18 years with a mild or moderate intellectual disability, living in the community with Type 2 diabetes, on any therapy other than insulin. Participants had mental capacity to consent to research and the intervention. Inclusion criteria included HbA1c > 48 mmol/mol (6.5%), BMI >25 kg/m2 , or self-reported physical activity below national guideline levels. The experimental intervention was standardized supported self-management delivered by diabetes specialist nurses plus treatment as usual, compared with treatment as usual alone. Feasibility outcomes included: recruitment and retention; intervention acceptability and feasibility; data collection and completeness for physiological state and values for candidate primary outcomes (HbA1c and BMI). RESULTS A total of 82 participants (89% of those contacted and eligible) were randomized. All supported self-management sessions were completed by 35/41 participants (85%); only four completed no sessions. Data on the follow-up candidate primary outcomes HbA1c and BMI were obtained for 75/82 (91%) and 77/82 participants (94%), respectively. The mean baseline HbA1c was 56±16.5 mmol/mol (7.3±1.5%) and the mean BMI was 34±7.6 kg/m2 . CONCLUSIONS Adherence to supported self-management and willingness to have blood taken for outcome measurement was good. A definitive randomized controlled trial is feasible in this population. (Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN41897033).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. House
- Leeds Institute of Health SciencesUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
| | - L. Bryant
- Leeds Institute of Health SciencesUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
| | - A. M. Russell
- Leeds Institute of Health SciencesUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
| | | | - L. Graham
- Clinical Trials Research UnitUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
| | - R. Walwyn
- Clinical Trials Research UnitUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
| | - J. M. Wright
- Leeds Institute of Health SciencesUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
| | - C. Hulme
- Leeds Institute of Health SciencesUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
| | - J. L O'Dwyer
- Leeds Institute of Health SciencesUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
| | - G. Latchford
- Leeds Institute of Health SciencesUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
| | | | - R. Ajjan
- Division of Cardiovascular and Diabetes ResearchUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
| | - A. Farrin
- Clinical Trials Research UnitUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
House A, Latchford G, Russell AM, Bryant L, Wright J, Graham E, Stansfield A, Ajjan R. Development of a supported self-management intervention for adults with type 2 diabetes and a learning disability. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2018; 4:106. [PMID: 29862037 PMCID: PMC5975532 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-018-0291-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2017] [Accepted: 05/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although supported self-management is a well-recognised part of chronic disease management, it has not been routinely used as part of healthcare for adults with a learning disability. We developed an intervention for adults with a mild or moderate learning disability and type 2 diabetes, building on the principles of supported self-management with reasonable adjustments made for the target population. METHODS In five steps, we:Clarified the principles of supported self-management as reported in the published literatureIdentified the barriers to effective self-management of type 2 diabetes in adults with a learning disabilityReviewed existing materials that aim to support self-management of diabetes for people with a learning disabilitySynthesised the outputs from the first three phases and identified elements of supported self-management that were (a) most relevant to the needs of our target population and (b) most likely to be acceptable and useful to themImplemented and field tested the intervention. RESULTS The final intervention had four standardised components: (1) establishing the participant's daily routines and lifestyle, (2) identifying supporters and their roles, (3) using this information to inform setting realistic goals and providing materials to the patient and supporter to help them be achieved and (4) monitoring progress against goals.Of 41 people randomised in a feasibility RCT, thirty five (85%) completed the intervention sessions, with over three quarters of all participants (78%) attending at least three sessions.Twenty-three out of 40 (58%) participants were deemed to be very engaged with the sessions and 12/40 (30%) with the materials; 30 (73%) participants had another person present with them during at least one of their sessions; 15/41 (37%) were reported to have a very engaged main supporter, and 18/41 (44%) had a different person who was not their main supporter but who was engaged in the intervention implementation. CONCLUSIONS The intervention was feasible to deliver and, as judged by participation and engagement, acceptable to participants and those who supported them. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN41897033 (registered 21/01/2013).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allan House
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | - Gary Latchford
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | - Amy M. Russell
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | - Louise Bryant
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | - Judy Wright
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | - Elizabeth Graham
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | | | - Ramzi Ajjan
- Division of Cardiovascular and Diabetes Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Identifying people with a learning disability: an advanced search for general practice. Br J Gen Pract 2017; 67:e842-e850. [PMID: 29061717 PMCID: PMC5697554 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17x693461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2017] [Accepted: 06/06/2017] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with learning disabilities (LD) have poor physical and mental health when compared with the general population. They are also likely to find it more difficult than others to describe their symptoms adequately. It is therefore harder for healthcare workers to identify the health needs of those with learning disabilities, with the danger of some problems being left unrecognised. Practice registers record only a proportion of those who are eligible, making it difficult to target improvements in their health care. AIM To test a Read Code search supporting the identification of people with a mild-to-moderate learning disability who are not currently on the learning disability register. DESIGN AND SETTING An observational study in primary care in West Yorkshire. METHOD Read Code searches were created to identify individuals with a learning disability not on the LD register; they were field tested and further refined before testing in general practice. RESULTS Diagnostic codes identified small numbers of individuals who should have been on the LD register. Functional and service use codes often created large numbers of false-positive results. The specific descriptive codes 'Learning difficulties' and 'Referral to learning disability team' needed follow-up review, and then identified some individuals with LD who were not on the register. CONCLUSION The Read Code search supported practices to populate their registers and was quick to run and review, making it a viable choice to support register revalidation. However, it did not find large numbers of people eligible for the LD register who were previously unidentified by their practice, suggesting that additional complementary methods are required to support practices to validate their registers.
Collapse
|