Combination of non-hypotensive doses of valsartan and enalapril improves survival of spontaneously hypertensive rats with endothelial dysfunction

Thromboxane A2 receptor antagonist (ONO-8809) attenuates renal disorders caused by salt overload in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats

Epidemiological and clinical studies have demonstrated that excessive salt intake causes severe hypertension and exacerbates organ derangement, such as in chronic kidney disease (CKD). In this study, we focused on evaluating the histological and gene expression effects in the kidneys of stroke‐prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP) with a high salt intake and the thromboxane A₂/ prostaglandin H₂ receptor (TPR) blocker ONO‐8809. Six‐week‐old SHRSPs were divided into three groups and were fed normal chow containing 0.4% NaCl, 2.0%NaCl or 2.0%NaCl + ONO‐8809 (0.6 mg/kg p.o. daily). Histological analyses with immunohistochemistry and a gene expression assay with a DNA kidney microarray were performed after 8 weeks. The following changes were observed in SHRSPs with the high salt intake. Glomerular sclerotic changes were remarkably observed in the juxtamedullary cortex areas. The ED1, monocyte chemoattractant protein‐1 (MCP‐1), nitrotyrosine and hypoxia inducible factor 1α (HIF‐1α) staining areas were increased in the glomeruli and interstitial portion of the kidneys. The genes Tbxa2r (that encodes TPR), Prcp and Car7 were significantly underexpressed in the kidneys. The plasma 8‐isoprostane level was significantly elevated and was attenuated with the ONO‐8809 treatment. Thromboxane A₂ (TXA₂) and oxidative stress exaggerated renal dysfunction in the salt‐loaded SHRSPs, and ONO‐8809 as a TPR blocker suppressed these changes. Therefore, ONO‐8809 is a candidate drug to prevent CKD in hypertensive patients when CKD is associated with a high salt intake.

Dataset concerning effects of stevia (Stevia rebaudiana bertoni), amlodipine, losartan, and valsartan on water consumption, blood glucose and heart tissue in gentamycin-induced nephrotoxicity in the rat model

This dataset indicates the effect of stevia (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni); angiotensin-II type-1 receptor (AT₁) blockers, losartan and valsartan; and a calcium (Ca²⁺) channel blocker, amlodipine; on water consumption, fasting blood glucose, and cardiac histology in gentamycin-induced nephrotoxic rat model. Six groups of male Sprague-Dawley rats were selected as sham control group, gentamycin-induced nephrotoxic disease control group; gentamycin-induced disease control groups treated with stevia (200 mg/kg/day); amlodipine (4 mg/kg/day); losartan (15 mg/kg/day) and valsartan (5 mg/kg/day) respectively. Fasting blood glucose level and water consumption were recorded daily for the first week and then weekly for the rest of treatment period. Serum creatinine, blood urea, total protein and lipid profile were determined. Histological examination of the heart tissue was assessed to find out any alteration of cardiac muscle tissue following gentamycin-induced nephrotoxicity. This article provides additional data collected from the same animals previously reported [1] .

Renoprotective effects of stevia (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni), amlodipine, valsartan, and losartan in gentamycin-induced nephrotoxicity in the rat model: Biochemical, hematological and histological approaches

The current study investigated the renoprotective effects of stevia, angiotensin-II type 1 receptor (AT1) blocker and calcium (Ca2+) channel blocker in gentamycin-induced nephrotoxicity in rat models. Six groups of male Sprague-Dawley rats of eight weeks old were taken for the experiment: sham control, nephrotoxicity, treatment with amlodipine (4 mg/kg/day); stevia (200 mg/kg/day); losartan (15 mg/kg/day) and valsartan (5 mg/kg/day), accordingly. The blood sample was taken for the assessment of renal and hepatic-functional variables like serum creatinine, blood urea, BUN and SGPT, SGOT, and total serum bilirubin. Hematological parameters were also examined. Histological examination has been done on kidneys and liver. Alterations of the body weight and the organ's weight were documented. Treatment with stevia and valsartan significantly decreased serum creatinine levels. A reduction of liver enzymes, and total serum bilirubin levels were observed in all the treatment groups. Treatment with valsartan and amlodipine, remarkably and stevia, mildly reduced the renal tissue damage, inflammation, and tubular necrosis. However, the present study demonstrated that losartan treatment aggravated kidney damage by increasing protein cast, calcification, tubular necrosis, and injury. This comparison indicated that both stevia and valsartan have beneficial renoprotective effect and valsartan offers a better treatment option in renal damage over losartan.

Oral administration of veratric acid, a constituent of vegetables and fruits, prevents cardiovascular remodelling in hypertensive rats: a functional evaluation

In our previous studies, veratric acid (VA) shows beneficial effect on hypertension and its associated dyslipidaemia. In continuation, this study was designed to investigate the effect of VA, one of the major benzoic acid derivatives from vegetables and fruits, on cardiovascular remodelling in hypertensive rats, primarily assessed by functional studies using Langendorff isolated heart system and organ bath system. Hypertension was induced in male albino Wistar rats by oral administration of N ω -nitro-l-arginine methyl ester hydrochloride (l-NAME) (40 mg/kg body weight (b.w.)) in drinking water for 4 weeks. VA was orally administered at a dose of 40 mg/kg b.w. l-NAME-treated rats showed impaired cardiac ventricular and vascular function, evaluated by Langendorff isolated heart system and organ bath studies, respectively; a significant increase in the lipid peroxidation products such as thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances and lipid hydroperoxides in aorta; and a significant decrease in the activities of superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase and levels of GSH, vitamin C and vitamin E in aorta. Fibrotic remodelling of the aorta and heart were assessed by Masson's Trichrome staining and Van Gieson's staining, respectively. In addition, l-NAME rats showed increased heart fibronectin expression assessed by immunohistochemical analysis. VA supplementation throughout the experimental period significantly normalised cardiovascular function, oxidative stress, antioxidant status and fibrotic remodelling of tissues. These results of the present study conclude that VA acts as a protective agent against hypertension-associated cardiovascular remodelling.

Vanillic acid: a potential inhibitor of cardiac and aortic wall remodeling in l-NAME induced hypertension through upregulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase

The objective of the present study is to investigate the effects of vanillic acid on blood pressure, cardiac marker enzymes, left ventricular function and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) expression in N(ω)-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester hydrochloride (l-NAME) induced hypertension in male albino Wistar rats. In hypertensive rats, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, cardiac marker enzymes and organ weight were increased. Impaired left ventricular function and decreased aortic eNOS expression was also observed in hypertensive rats. Moreover, treatment with vanillic acid exhibited beneficial effect on blood pressure, left ventricular function and cardiac marker enzymes. In addition, treatment with vanillic acid on hypertensive rats had upregulated eNOS expression and showed beneficial effects evidenced by histopathology and ultrastructural observations of aorta. In conclusion, vanillic acid has enough potential to normalize hypertension and left ventricular function in l-NAME induced hypertensive rats. With additional studies, vanillic acid might be used as a functional drug or as an adjuvant in the management of hypertension.

Ang II and Ang IV: unraveling the mechanism of action on synaptic plasticity, memory, and epilepsy

The central angiotensin system plays a crucial role in cardiovascular regulation. More recently, angiotensin peptides have been implicated in stress, anxiety, depression, cognition, and epilepsy. Angiotensin II (Ang II) exerts its actions through AT(1) and AT(2) receptors, while most actions of its metabolite Ang IV were believed to be independent of AT(1) or AT(2) receptor activation. A specific binding site with high affinity for Ang IV was discovered and denominated "AT(4) receptor". The beneficiary effects of AT(4) ligands in animal models for cognitive impairment and epileptic seizures initiated the search for their mechanism of action. This proved to be a challenging task, and after 20 years of research, the nature of the "AT(4) receptor" remains controversial. Insulin-regulated aminopeptidase (IRAP) was first identified as the high-affinity binding site for AT(4) ligands. Recently, the hepatocyte growth factor receptor c-MET was also proposed as a receptor for AT(4) ligands. The present review focuses on the effects of Ang II and Ang IV on synaptic transmission and plasticity, learning, memory, and epileptic seizure activity. Possible interactions of Ang IV with the classical AT(1) and AT(2) receptor subtypes are evaluated, and other potential mechanisms by which AT(4) ligands may exert their effects are discussed. Identification of these mechanisms may provide a valuable target in the development in novel drugs for the treatment of cognitive disorders and epilepsy.

[Preclinical and clinical profile of Valsartan, a selective angiotensin II type-1 receptor blocker]

Valsartan (Diovan) is a potent, orally active, specific, and highly selective blocker for the AT1-receptor subtype. The antihypertensive effects of oral treatment with valsartan were preclinically demonstrated in the sodium-depleted marmosets, renal hypertensive rats (2K1C), spontaneous hypertensive rats (SHR) and stroke-prone SHR. Moreover, valsartan had protective effects against hypertensive end-organ damage such as cardiac hypertrophy and renal disease. In an investigation of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in normotensive male volunteers, valsartan was rapidly absorbed with the maximal plasma concentration occurring 2-3 h after oral administration. The elimination half-life was about 4-6 h, valsartan was poorly metabolized, and most of the drug was excreted via feces. Valsartan produced persistent reductions of blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension and had a good safety profile with a wide therapeutic window between the effective pharmacological doses and the toxic doses. Therefore, valsartan is expected to be a safe and effective antihypertensive agent for the treatment of essential and severe hypertension.

Combination of low-dose valsartan and enalapril improves endothelial dysfunction and coronary reserve in Nomega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester-treated spontaneously hypertensive rats

Combination of nonhypotensive doses of valsartan and enalapril markedly improved survival (+87%) compared with untreated animals (37%) in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) with endothelial dysfunction. However, the combination had no effect on kidney function, and proteinuria persisted over the 12 weeks of the study. It was hypothesized that the greater survival was due to improvement in endothelial function or coronary vasculature despite blockade of nitric oxide synthase and high blood pressure. Therefore, endothelial function was evaluated in isolated aortic ring and maximal coronary blood flow was studied in isolated perfused SHR hearts (20-24 weeks) treated with -nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) (50 mg/l) for 4 weeks. The animals received vehicle, valsartan 5 mg/kg/d, enalapril 1 mg/kg/d, valsartan 50 mg/kg/d, or the combination valsartan 5 mg/kg/d with enalapril 1 mg/kg/d in drinking water. Normotensive Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats were used as control. Blood pressure was measured by telemetry. Histopathology was performed on heart, kidney (hematoxylin-eosin), and aorta (Masson trichrome). L-NAME elevated blood pressure by 50 mm Hg after vehicle (199 +/- 5 mm Hg). Valsartan 50 mg/kg/d completely abolished this increase (150 +/- 4 mm Hg) whereas the valsartan-enalapril combination synergistically decreased blood pressure (-37 mm Hg at 162 +/- 7 mm Hg) compared with monotherapy (valsartan 5 mg/kg/d -10 mm Hg; enalapril 1 mg/kg/d -15 mm Hg). All treatments improved the histopathology, most markedly in those receiving the valsartan-enalapril combination. The severity mean grades for lesions were 2.1, 1.9, 1.7, 1.1, and 0.9 in vehicle-treated SHRs, enalapril 1 mg/kg/d, valsartan 5 mg/kg/d, valsartan 5 or 50 mg/kg/d, and the valsartan-enalapril combination, respectively, compared with 0.02 in WKY rats. Acetylcholine-induced relaxation was significantly greater in treated SHRs than after vehicle (-40% at 0.1 mmol acetylcholine) but the combination induced the maximal relaxation (-85%). The ratio of maximal tension induced by serotonin in rings with and without endothelium was 1.4 and 1.3 in vehicle and valsartan 5 mg/kg/d-treated rats whereas it did not differ from 1 in WKY rats and all other treated groups. The cardiac hypertrophy (+27%) was prevented by valsartan 50 mg/kg/d and the valsartan-enalapril combination. Coronary reserve was significantly increased by valsartan 50 mg/kg/d (+85% at 7.8 +/- 0.7 ml/min/g) and the valsartan-enalapril combination (+42% at 6.0 +/- 0.4 ml/min/g) compared with 4.2 +/- 0.5 (vehicle). This was not different of 8.8 +/- 0.5 (WKYs). Despite the maintenance of a high blood pressure, low-dose valsartan-enalapril significantly improved endothelial function and histopathology and increased coronary reserve in SHRs chronically receiving L-NAME.

Vascular and cardiac benefits of angiotensin receptor blockers

Angiotensin II not only is a vasoconstrictor, but it also affects cell growth and apoptosis, inflammation, fibrosis, and coagulation. Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system, either with inhibitors of the generation of angiotensin (angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitors) or with blockers of angiotensin receptors, reduces blood pressure and inhibits other pathophysiological actions. These other effects provide benefits in coronary heart disease, heart failure, diabetic nephropathy, and stroke beyond blood pressure reduction. These benefits were first demonstrated with ACE inhibitors. However, the mechanism of action of angiotensin receptor blockers, which block angiotensin II stimulation at the angiotensin type 1 receptor but not at the type 2 receptor, may have advantages, particularly for endothelial dysfunction and vascular remodeling, as well as cardiac and renal protection. Recent multicenter trials suggest that ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers may reduce morbidity and mortality associated with cardiovascular and renal disease beyond blood pressure reduction. Several studies with different angiotensin receptor blockers, including comparisons with ACE inhibitors, are under way, and should provide further guidance for their clinical use.