Long-term safety of deferiprone treatment in children from the Mediterranean region with beta-thalassemia major: the DEEP-3 multi-center observational safety study

[Guidelines for iron chelation therapy in thalassemia in China (2025)]

Iron overload is a major complication of thalassemia, clinically manifested as heart failure, liver cirrhosis, diabetes, growth and development retardation, and delayed sexual development, with severe cases leading to death. Standardized iron chelation therapy is essential to ensure long-term and high-quality survival for patients. This guideline provides recommendations on methods for detecting iron overload, the timing for initiating iron chelation therapy, treatment strategies for transfusion-dependent and non-transfusion-dependent thalassemia, and special circumstances regarding iron chelation therapy, serving as a reference for iron chelation treatment in thalassemia.

Beta Thalassemia in Children: Established Approaches, Old Issues, New Non-Curative Therapies, and Perspectives on Healing

Despite a decrease in prevalence and incidence rates, beta thalassemia continues to represent a significant public health challenge worldwide. In high-resource settings, children with thalassemia have an open prognosis, with a high chance of reaching adulthood and old age with a good quality of life. This is achievable if transfusion therapy is properly managed, effectively mitigating ineffective erythropoiesis and its associated complications while also minimizing excessive iron accumulation. Adequate iron chelation is essential to maintain reactive forms of iron within the normal range throughout life, thus preventing organ damage caused by hemosiderosis, which inevitably results from a regular transfusion regimen. New therapies, both curative, such as gene therapy, and non-curative, such as modulators of erythropoiesis, are becoming available for patients with transfusion-dependent beta thalassemia. Two curative approaches based on gene therapy have been investigated in both adults and children with thalassemia. The first approach uses a lentivirus to correct the genetic defect, delivering a functional gene copy to the patient's cells. The second approach employs CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing to directly modify the defective gene at the molecular level. No non-curative therapies have received approval for pediatric use. Among adults, the only available drug is luspatercept, which is currently undergoing clinical trials in pediatric populations. However, in many countries around the world, the new therapeutic options remain a mirage, and even transfusion therapy itself is not guaranteed for most patients, while the choice of iron chelation therapy depends on drug availability and affordability.

Rates of severe neutropenia and infection risk in patients treated with deferiprone: 28 years of data

ABSTRACT

Patients treated with deferiprone for transfusional iron overload may experience idiosyncratic drug-induced neutropenia (IDIN) that may increase risk of infection. This analysis examined the rates of severe IDIN and risk of serious infections at different absolute neutrophil count (ANC) levels during deferiprone treatment. Events of severe IDIN (ANC <0.5 × 109/L) and associated serious infections from clinical trials and postmarketing setting were analyzed by discrete ANC levels: group 1, 0.2 × 109/L to 0.5 × 109/L; group 2, 0.1 × 109/L to 0.199 × 109/L; group 3, <0.1 × 109/L. In clinical trials, 22 events of severe IDIN occurred (group 1, n = 9; group 2, n = 3; group 3, n = 10), and rates of severe IDIN per 100 patient-years were 0.45 in group 1; 0.15 in group 2; and 0.50 in group 3 (1990.26 patient-years deferiprone exposure). All serious infections were in group 3 (3/10 [30.0%]). In the postmarketing setting, 176 events of severe IDIN were reported (group 1, n = 65; group 2, n = 20; group 3, n = 91) and rates of severe IDIN per 100 patient-years were 0.06 in group 1; 0.02 in group 2; and 0.08 in group 3 (111 570.24 patient-years deferiprone exposure). Rates of serious infection were 7.7% (5/65) in group 1; 10% (2/20) in group 2; and 13.2% (12/91) in group 3. Our findings suggest a high risk of serious infections with ANC <0.2 × 109/L during deferiprone treatment, a level consistent with the recent neutropenia guidelines.

Iron chelation therapy for children with transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia: How young is too young?

In this review, we provide a summary of evidence on iron overload in young children with transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (TDT) and explore the ideal timing for intervention. Key data from clinical trials and observational studies of the three available iron chelators deferoxamine, deferiprone, and deferasirox are also evaluated for inclusion of subsets of young children, especially those less than 6 years of age. Evidence on the efficacy and safety of iron chelation therapy for children ≥2 years of age with transfusional iron overload is widely available. New data exploring the risks and benefits of early-start iron chelation in younger patients with minimal iron overload are also emerging.

Deferiprone versus deferoxamine for transfusional iron overload in sickle cell disease and other anemias: Pediatric subgroup analysis of the randomized, open-label FIRST study

BACKGROUND

Children with sickle cell disease (SCD) who are chronically transfused often, require iron chelation therapy. There are limited data that allow for comparison of the efficacy and safety of the iron chelator deferiprone versus deferoxamine in children with SCD.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis of the phase 3b/4, randomized, open-label FIRST (Ferriprox in Patients with IRon Overload in Sickle Cell Disease Trial) study (NCT02041299) included patients 17 years and younger with SCD or other anemias receiving deferiprone or deferoxamine.

RESULTS

Overall, 142 patients were evaluated; mean ages were 10.5 and 11.7 years in the deferiprone and deferoxamine groups, respectively. At 12 months: mean change from baseline in liver iron concentration was -3.3 mg/g dry weight (dw) with deferiprone and -3.4 mg/g dw with deferoxamine (p = .8216); relative mean change (coefficient of variation %) in log cardiac T2* magnetic resonance imaging was 1.02 (21.8%) with deferiprone and 0.95 (19.5%) with deferoxamine (p = .0717); and the mean (standard error) change in serum ferritin levels was -133.0 (200.3) μg/L with deferiprone and -467.1 (244.1) μg/L with deferoxamine (p = .2924). The most common deferiprone-related adverse events (AEs) were upper abdominal pain (20.2%), vomiting (13.8%), pyrexia (9.6%), decreased neutrophil count (9.6%), increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT; 9.6%), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST; 9.6%). All cases of increased ALT, increased AST, and neutropenia resolved, most without intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

This post hoc analysis of pediatric patients from FIRST corroborated previous findings in adults that deferiprone is comparable to deferoxamine in reducing iron overload. No new safety concerns were observed. Deferiprone is an oral chelation option that could improve adherence and outcomes in children.

No difference in myocardial iron concentration and serum ferritin with deferasirox and deferiprone in pediatric patients with hemoglobinopathies: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Iron overload is a common complication experienced by transfusion-dependent children with hemoglobin disorders. Chelators such as deferasirox (DFX) and deferiprone (DFP) are effective in overcoming this problem. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of DFX compared to DFP in treating iron overload amongst pediatric patients with hemoglobin disorders.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

PubMed and Cochrane Central were searched from their inception until Dec 21 2021, for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies, which assessed the efficacy of DFX compared to DFP in the treatment of inherited hemoglobin disorders. The outcomes of interest included myocardial iron concentration (MRI T2*) at the end of the trial and change in mean serum ferritin (SF) levels at the 6 and 12 months mark. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for continuous outcomes using random effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 5 studies comprising 607 children were included. The results of our analysis revealed no significant difference between DFX and DFP in MRI T2* at the end of treatment (WMD: -0.92; 95% CI [-3.35, 1.52]; p = 0.46; I² = 0). Moreover, there has been no significant difference noted in SF levels at both 6 months (WMD: 97.31; 95% CI [-236.16, 430.77]; p = 0.57; I² = 0) and 12 months (WMD: 46.99; 95% CI [-191.42, 285.40]; p = 0.70; I² = 0) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis shows no significant difference between the efficacy of DFX and DFP in the management of iron overload in children with inherited blood disorders. Future large-scale clinical trials are required to further validate our results.

Foetal haemoglobin inducers for reducing blood transfusion in non-transfusion-dependent beta-thalassaemias

BACKGROUND

Non-transfusion-dependent β-thalassaemia (NTDβT) is a subset of inherited haemoglobin disorders characterised by reduced production of the β-globin chain of haemoglobin leading to anaemia of varying severity. Although blood transfusion is not a necessity for survival, it may be required to prevent complications of chronic anaemia, such as impaired growth and hypercoagulability. People with NTDβT also experience iron overload due to increased iron absorption from food sources which becomes more pronounced in those requiring blood transfusion. People with a higher foetal haemoglobin (HbF) level have been found to require fewer blood transfusions, thus leading to the emergence of treatments that could increase its level. HbF inducers stimulate HbF production without altering any gene structures. Evidence for the possible benefits and harms of these inducers is important for making an informed decision on their use.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness and safety of the following for reducing blood transfusion for people with NTDβT: 1. HbF inducers versus usual care or placebo; 2. single HbF inducer with another HbF inducer, and single dose with another dose; and 3. combination of HbF inducers versus usual care or placebo, or single HbF inducer.

SEARCH METHODS

We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 21 August 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs comparing single HbF inducer with placebo or usual care, with another single HbF inducer or with a combination of HbF inducers; or comparing different doses of the same HbF inducer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were blood transfusion and haemoglobin levels. Our secondary outcomes were HbF levels, the long-term sequelae of NTDβT, quality of life and adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We included seven RCTs involving 291 people with NTDβT, aged two to 49 years, from five countries. We reported 10 comparisons using eight different HbF inducers (four pharmacological and four natural): three RCTs compared a single HbF inducer to placebo and seven to another HbF inducer. The duration of the intervention lasted from 56 days to six months. Most studies did not adequately report the randomisation procedures or whether and how blinding was achieved. HbF inducer against placebo or usual care Three HbF inducers, HQK-1001, Radix Astragali or a 3-in-1 combined natural preparation (CNP), were compared with a placebo. None of the comparisons reported the frequency of blood transfusion. We are uncertain whether Radix Astragali and CNP increase haemoglobin at three months (mean difference (MD) 1.33 g/dL, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54 to 2.11; 1 study, 2 interventions, 35 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether Radix Astragali and CNP have any effect on HbF (MD 12%, 95% CI -0.74% to 24.75%; 1 study, 2 interventions, 35 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Only medians on haemoglobin and HbF levels were reported for HQK-1001. Adverse effects reported for HQK-1001 were nausea, vomiting, dizziness and suprapubic pain. There were no prespecified adverse effects for Radix Astragali and CNP. HbF inducer versus another HbF inducer Four studies compared a single inducer with another over three to six months. Comparisons included hydroxyurea versus resveratrol, hydroxyurea versus thalidomide, hydroxyurea versus decitabine and Radix Astragali versus CNP. No study reported our prespecified outcomes on blood transfusion. Haemoglobin and HbF were reported for the comparison Radix Astragali versus CNP, but we are uncertain whether there were any differences (1 study, 24 participants; low-certainty evidence). Different doses of the same HbF inducer Two studies compared two different types of HbF inducers at different doses over two to six months. Comparisons included hydroxyurea 20 mg/kg/day versus 10 mg/kg/day and HQK-1001 10 mg/kg/day, 20 mg/kg/day, 30 mg/kg/day and 40 mg/kg/day. Blood transfusion, as prespecified, was not reported. In one study (61 participants) we are uncertain whether the lower levels of both haemoglobin and HbF at 24 weeks were due to the higher dose of hydroxyurea (haemoglobin: MD -2.39 g/dL, 95% CI -2.80 to -1.98; very low-certainty evidence; HbF: MD -10.20%, 95% CI -16.28% to -4.12%; very low-certainty evidence). The study of the four different doses of HQK-1001 did not report results for either haemoglobin or HbF. We are not certain if major adverse effects may be more common with higher hydroxyurea doses (neutropenia: risk ratio (RR) 9.93, 95% CI 1.34 to 73.97; thrombocytopenia: RR 3.68, 95% CI 1.12 to 12.07; very low-certainty evidence). Taking HQK-1001 20 mg/kg/day may result in the fewest adverse effects. A combination of HbF inducers versus a single HbF inducer Two studies compared three combinations of two inducers with a single inducer over six months: hydroxyurea plus resveratrol versus resveratrol or hydroxyurea alone, and hydroxyurea plus l-carnitine versus hydroxyurea alone. Blood transfusion was not reported. Hydroxyurea plus resveratrol may reduce haemoglobin compared with either resveratrol or hydroxyurea alone (MD -0.74 g/dL, 95% CI -1.45 to -0.03; 1 study, 54 participants; low-certainty evidence). We are not certain whether the gastrointestinal disturbances, headache and malaise more commonly reported with hydroxyurea plus resveratrol than resveratrol alone were due to the interventions. We are uncertain whether hydroxyurea plus l-carnitine compared with hydroxyurea alone may increase mean haemoglobin, and reduce pulmonary hypertension (1 study, 60 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Adverse events were reported but not in the intervention group. None of the comparisons reported the outcome of HbF.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We are uncertain whether any of the eight HbF inducers in this review have a beneficial effect on people with NTDβT. For each of these HbF inducers, we found only one or at the most two small studies. There is no information on whether any of these HbF inducers have an effect on our primary outcome, blood transfusion. For the second primary outcome, haemoglobin, there may be small differences between intervention groups, but these may not be clinically meaningful and are of low- to very low-certainty evidence. Data on adverse effects and optimal doses are limited. Five studies are awaiting classification, but none are ongoing.

Drug safety in thalassemia: lessons from the present and directions for the future

Introduction: Beta-thalassemia is an autosomal recessive hereditary anemia characterized by reduced or absent β-globin chain synthesis, affecting about 60,000 people peryear. Management for β-thalassemia major includes regular blood transfusions followed by iron chelating therapy and drug targeting ineffective erythropoiesis.Areas covered: The safety of licensed drugs for the management of β-thalassemia is reviewed, using evidence from clinical trials and observational research. Such drugs include the iron chelators and the erythrocyte maturation agent luspatercept. The safety of emerging treatment, such as hydroxyurea and thalidomide is also reviewed.Expert opinion: Beta-thalassemia is arare disease, and is not surprising that there are limited studies investigating the safety of drugs used in this disease. Indeed, although observational studies are the main source of drug safety information in areal-world setting, only eleven studies were identified for iron-chelators and none of these estimated the risk of agiven safety outcome. Future work should aim to better leverage existing sources of real-world datato investigate drug safety in thalassemia.

Incorporating a clinical oncology pharmacist into an ambulatory care pharmacy in pediatric hematology–oncology and transplant clinic: Assessment and significance

Background

Beta thalassemia patients, post-bone marrow transplant, and leukemia patients require long term therapy with an intense care follow-up especially for pediatric hematology–oncology origin. Emergence of side effects and noncompliance to therapy lead to reduced efficacy of medicines resulting in relapse of diseases. There is an increasing fact to support the incorporation of a pharmacist into clinical team due to their distinctive skills. Clinical oncology pharmacist with experience and specialized training in hematological cancers and bone marrow transplantation (BMT) patient care has in-depth knowledge and skills of chemotherapy regimens including drug information, monitoring parameters of cancer treatment, dose adjustment, drug–drug interactions, adverse effects, and patient counseling skills.

Aim and objectives

The main objective of our study was to assess the significance of incorporation of clinical oncology pharmacist in ambulatory care in pediatric hematology–oncology and transplant clinic.

Material and method

This study was conducted at National Institute of Blood Diseases and Bone Marrow Transplantation hospital with duration of five months from 17 March 2019 to 16 July 2019. In this study the clinical oncology pharmacist was made available at ambulatory clinic of hematology–oncology and transplantation. The activities performed by a clinical oncology pharmacist were observed by resident BMT clinical pharmacist during the visits of patients and their families in a clinic. The BMT pharmacist is a clinical oncology pharmacist with experience and specialized training in hematological cancers and BMT patient care. Only pediatrics patients with beta thalassemia major and those who were on chemotherapy treatment and post-transplant patient were included in this study.

Results

During the five months’ tenure, there were 1820 pediatric patients’ visits in total. The clinical oncology pharmacist performed 980 direct patient interviews and documented 1665 pharmacist interventions. The majority of the documented clinical oncology pharmacist interventions were review of medication histories (n: 404, 24%) and “deferiprone” dose adjustments (n:400, 24%). Genomic profiling interventions were also among the commonly reported activities by the clinical oncology pharmacist. For beta thalassemia patients undergoing hydroxyurea therapy, the genomic profiling was performed to assess whether the hydroxyurea treatment is clinically effective or not (n:396, 23%).

Conclusion

The involvement of clinical oncology pharmacist into a specialized outpatient clinic of hematology–oncology and transplant clinic plays an integral role in minimizing the adverse effect and reduction in readmission into the hospital. This is new expansion of pharmacist’s role especially in underdeveloped country, considering the relevant clinical participation of clinical oncology pharmacist into specialized clinic revealing through optimized therapy and future prospect of clinical oncology pharmacist in pediatric hematology.

Beta Thalassemia: Monitoring and New Treatment Approaches

Beta thalassemias are a significant global health problem. Globin chain imbalance leads to a complex physiologic cascade of hemolytic anemia, ineffective erythropoiesis, and iron overload. Management of the broad spectrum of phenotypes requires the careful use of red blood transfusions, supportive care, monitoring, and management of iron overload. In this article, the authors discuss recommendations for monitoring of individuals with thalassemia, as well as ongoing preclinical and clinical trials of therapies targeting different aspects of thalassemia pathophysiology.

Single-center retrospective study of the effectiveness and toxicity of the oral iron chelating drugs deferiprone and deferasirox

BACKGROUND

Iron overload, resulting from blood transfusions in patients with chronic anemias, has historically been controlled with regular deferoxamine, but its parenteral requirement encouraged studies of orally-active agents, including deferasirox and deferiprone. Deferasirox, licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2005 based upon the results of randomized controlled trials, is now first-line therapy worldwide. In contrast, early investigator-initiated trials of deferiprone were prematurely terminated after investigators raised safety concerns. The FDA declined market approval of deferiprone; years later, it licensed the drug as "last resort" therapy, to be prescribed only if first-line drugs had failed. We undertook to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and toxicities of deferiprone and deferasirox in one transfusion clinic.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Under an IRB-approved study, we retrospectively inspected the electronic medical records of consented iron-loaded patients managed between 2009 and 2015 at The University Health Network (UHN), Toronto. We compared changes in liver and heart iron, adverse effects and other outcomes, in patients treated with deferiprone or deferasirox.

RESULTS

Although deferiprone was unlicensed in Canada, one-third (n = 41) of locally-transfused patients had been switched from first-line, licensed therapies (deferoxamine or deferasirox) to regimens of unlicensed deferiprone. The primary endpoint of monitoring in iron overload, hepatic iron concentration (HIC), increased (worsened) during deferiprone monotherapy (mean 10±2-18±2 mg/g; p < 0.0003), exceeding the threshold for life-threatening complications (15 mg iron/g liver) in 50% patients. During deferasirox monotherapy, mean HIC decreased (improved) (11±1-6±1 mg/g; p < 0.0001). Follow-up HICs were significantly different following deferiprone and deferasirox monotherapies (p < 0.0000002). Addition of low-dose deferoxamine (<40 mg/kg/day) to deferiprone did not result in reductions of HIC to <15 mg/g (baseline 20±4 mg/g; follow-up, 18±4 mg/g; p < 0.2) or in reduction in the proportion of patients with HIC exceeding 15 mg/g (p < 0.2). During deferiprone exposure, new diabetes mellitus, a recognized consequence of inadequate iron control, was diagnosed in 17% patients, most of whom had sustained HICs exceeding 15 mg/g for years; one woman died after 13 months of a regimen of deferiprone and low-dose deferasirox. During deferiprone exposure, serum ALT increased over baseline in 65% patients. Mean serum ALT increased 6.6-fold (p < 0.001) often persisting for years. During deferasirox exposure, mean ALT was unchanged (p < 0.84). No significant differences between treatment groups were observed in the proportions of patients estimated to have elevated cardiac iron.

CONCLUSIONS

Deferiprone showed ineffectiveness and significant toxicity in most patients. Combination with low doses of first-line therapies did not improve the effectiveness of deferiprone. Exposure to deferiprone, over six years while the drug was unlicensed, in the face of ineffectiveness and serious toxicities, demands review of the standards of local medical practice. The limited scope of regulatory approval of deferiprone, worldwide, should restrict its exposure to the few patients genuinely unable to tolerate the two effective, first-line therapies.

Predicting factors for liver iron overload at the first magnetic resonance in children with thalassaemia major

BACKGROUND

Transfusion dependency determines iron overload in thalassaemia major, with devastating complications. Significant liver iron overload has been observed from early childhood and we aimed to evaluate factors that could predict liver iron overload at the first magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All transfusion-dependent children who underwent MRI to assess iron overload were retrospectively studied. Age, weight, height, blood requirement, chelation drug and dosage, serum ferritin and liver enzymes were evaluated at three specific steps: start of transfusion regimen, start of chelation therapy, and first MRI.

RESULTS

Among 198 patients, 25 children met inclusion criteria. No differences were detected in all the assessed parameters at start of transfusion regimen and chelation therapy (p>0.05) between patients with good iron balance (liver iron concentration [LIC] <7 mg Fe/g dry weight [dw]) and liver iron overload (LIC >7). At the first MRI, patients with iron overload had significantly higher serum ferritin (3,080.3±1,078.5 vs 1,672.0±705.3 ng/mL; p<0.01) while patients with good iron control maintained a stable ferritin value from the start of chelation therapy but showed significantly lower height Z-score (-1.48±1.02 vs -0.36±1.55; p=0.04). Serum ferritin >1,770 ng/mL was detected as the best threshold for predicting liver iron overload at the first MRI (p=0.0003).

CONCLUSION

In order to prevent liver iron overload at the first MRI, children should maintain a stable level of serum ferritin below 1,770 from the start of chelation therapy. However, strict monitoring of growth is mandatory.