Gradient-dependent inhibition of stimulatory signaling from platelet G protein-coupled receptors

Preanalytical conditions for multiparameter platelet flow cytometry

Background

Flow cytometry is an important technique for understanding multiple aspects of blood platelet biology. Despite the widespread use of the platform for assessing platelet function, the optimization and careful consideration of preanalytical conditions, sample processing techniques, and data analysis strategies should be regularly assessed. When set up and designed with optimal conditions, it can ensure the acquisition of robust and reproducible flow cytometry data. However, these parameters are rarely described despite their importance.

Objectives

We aimed to characterize the effects of several preanalytical variables on the analysis of blood platelets by multiparameter fluorescent flow cytometry.

Methods

We assessed anticoagulant choice, sample material, sample processing, and storage times on 4 distinct and commonly used markers of platelet activation, including fibrinogen binding, expression of CD62P and CD42b, and phosphatidylserine exposure.

Results

The use of suboptimal conditions led to increases in basal platelet activity and reduced sensitivities to stimulation; however, the use of optimal conditions protected the platelets from artifactual stimulation and preserved basal activity and sensitivity to activation.

Conclusion

The optimal preanalytical conditions identified here for the measurement of platelet phenotype by flow cytometry suggest a framework for future development of multiparameter platelet assays for high-quality data sets and advanced analysis.

Repeated platelet activation and the potential of previously activated platelets to contribute to thrombus formation

BACKGROUND

Especially in disease conditions, platelets can encounter activating agents in circulation.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the extent to which previously activated platelets can be reactivated and whether in-and reactivation applies to different aspects of platelet activation and thrombus formation.

METHODS

Short-and long-term effects of glycoprotein VI (GPVI) and G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) stimulation on platelet activation and aggregation potential were compared via flow cytometry and plate-based aggregation. Using fluorescence and electron microscopy, we assessed platelet morphology and content, as well as thrombus formation.

RESULTS

After 30 minutes of stimulation with thrombin receptor activator peptide 6 (TRAP6) or adenosine diphosphate (ADP), platelets secondarily decreased in PAC-1 binding and were less able to aggregate. The reversibility of platelets after thrombin stimulation was concentration dependent. Reactivation was possible via another receptor. In contrast, cross-linked collagen-related peptide (CRP-XL) or high thrombin stimulation evoked persistent effects in α_IIbβ₃ activation and platelet aggregation. However, after 60 minutes of CRP-XL or high thrombin stimulation, when α_IIbβ₃ activation slightly decreased, restimulation with ADP or CRP-XL, respectively, increased integrin activation again. Compatible with decreased integrin activation, platelet morphology was reversed. Interestingly, reactivation of reversed platelets again resulted in shape change and if not fully degranulated, additional secretion. Moreover, platelets that were previously activated with TRAP6 or ADP regained their potential to contribute to thrombus formation under flow. On the contrary, prior platelet triggering with CRP-XL was accompanied by prolonged platelet activity, leading to a decreased secondary platelet adhesion under flow.

CONCLUSION

This work emphasizes that prior platelet activation can be reversed, whereafter platelets can be reactivated through a different receptor. Reversed, previously activated platelets can contribute to thrombus formation.

Tirofiban potentiates agonist-induced platelet activation and degranulation, despite effectively inhibiting aggregation

We aimed to investigate the effects of integrin αIIbβ3 inhibitor tirofiban on hallmarks of platelet activation, degranulation, and aggregation during its use to analyze activated but non-complexed platelets via flow cytometry. To do so, we used washed platelets from healthy human donors. We combined aggregometry, an assay of platelet functionality, with flow cytometry and ELISA to detect and correlate, respectively, platelet aggregation, activation, and granule release. While tirofiban effectively inhibited agonist-induced platelet aggregation (thrombin receptor-activating peptide 6 (TRAP), convulxin (CVX), U46619 and IV.3), the surface expression of P-selectin and CD63 and granule release of RANTES were significantly increased, indicating that tirofiban enhances degranulation, uncoupled from aggregation. The results show that tirofiban alters the activation phenotype of platelets, something that should be considered when using tirofiban to enable flow cytometric analysis of activated but unaggregated platelet suspensions.

Effects of Heparin and Bivalirudin on Thrombin-Induced Platelet Activation: Differential Modulation of PAR Signaling Drives Divergent Prothrombotic Responses

Heparin and bivalirudin are widely used as anticoagulants in the setting of acute thrombosis. In this study, we investigated how these drugs affect the ability of thrombin to generate a prothrombotic platelet response via activation of the protease-activated receptors (PARs) 1 and 4. We examined the effects of heparin/antithrombin and bivalirudin on PAR1- and PAR4-mediated intracellular calcium mobilization, aggregation, α-granule release, and procoagulant membrane exposure in platelets exposed to thrombin concentrations likely to be encountered in the thrombus microenvironment during thrombosis. At physiological antithrombin levels, heparin treatment resulted in complete and sustained inhibition of thrombin-induced PAR4-mediated platelet activation, but transient PAR1 signaling was sufficient to elicit significant α-granule release and platelet aggregation. In contrast, bivalirudin treatment resulted in rapid and profound inhibition of signaling from both PAR receptors, followed by a delayed phase of PAR4-mediated platelet activation, resulting in a robust prothrombotic response. Combination treatment with bivalirudin and subtherapeutic concentrations of heparin completely inhibited the residual platelet activation observed with single drug treatment at all time-points. Our results show that heparin and bivalirudin have different and complementary inhibitory effects on the activation of PAR1 and PAR4 by thrombin.

Multidimensional flow cytometry reveals novel platelet subpopulations in response to prostacyclin

BACKGROUND

Robust platelet activation leads to the generation of subpopulations characterized by differential expression of phosphatidylserine (PS). Prostacyclin (PGI2 ) modulates many aspects of platelet function, but its influence on platelet subpopulations is unknown.

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS

We used fluorescent flow cytometry coupled to multidimensional fast Fourier transform-accelerated interpolation-based t-stochastic neighborhood embedding analysis to examine the influence of PGI2 on platelet subpopulations.

RESULTS

Platelet activation (SFLLRN/CRP-XL) in whole blood revealed three platelet subpopulations with unique combinations of fibrinogen (fb) binding and PS exposure. These subsets, PSlo /fbhi (68%), PShi /fblo (23%), and PShi /fbhi (8%), all expressed CD62P and partially shed CD42b. PGI2 significantly reduced fibrinogen binding and prevented the majority of PS exposure, but did not significantly reduce CD62P, CD154, or CD63 leading to the generation of four novel subpopulations, CD62Phi /PSlo /fblo (64%), CD62Phi /PSlo /fbhi (22%), CD62Phi /PShi /fblo (3%), and CD62Plo /PSlo /fblo (12%). Mechanistically this was linked to PGI2 -mediated inhibition of mitochondrial depolarization upstream of PS exposure. Combining phosphoflow with surface staining, we showed that PGI2 -treated platelets were characterized by both elevated vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation and CD62P. The resistance to cyclic AMP signaling was also observed for CD154 and CD63 expression. Consistent with the functional role of CD62P, exposure of blood to PGI2 failed to prevent SFLLRN/CRP-XL-induced platelet-monocyte aggregation despite reducing markers of hemostatic function.

CONCLUSION

The combination of multicolor flow cytometry assays with unbiased computational tools has identified novel platelet subpopulations that suggest differential regulation of platelet functions by PGI2 . Development of this approach with increased surface and intracellular markers will allow the identification of rare platelet subtypes and novel biomarkers.

Long-term platelet priming after glycoprotein VI stimulation in comparison to Protease-Activating Receptor (PAR) stimulation

Platelets can respond to multiple antagonists and agonists, implying that their activation state is a consequence of past exposure to these substances. While platelets are often considered as one-time responsive cells, they likely can respond to sequential application of inhibitors and stimuli. We hypothesized that the ability of platelets to sequentially respond depends on the time and type of repeated agonist application. The present proof-of-concept data show that iloprost (cAMP elevation), tirofiban (integrin α_IIbβ₃ blocker) and Syk kinase inhibition subacutely modulated platelet aggregation, i.e. halted this process even when applied after agonist. In comparison to thrombin-activated receptor (PAR) stimulation, glycoprotein VI (GPVI) stimulation was less sensitive to time-dependent blockage of aggregation, with Syk inhibition as an exception. Furthermore, cytosolic Ca²⁺ measurements indicated that, when compared to PAR, prior GPVI stimulation induced a more persistent, priming activation state of platelets that influenced the response to a next agent. Overall, these data point to an unexpected priming memory of activated platelets in subacutely responding to another inhibitor or stimulus, with a higher versatility and faster offset after PAR stimulation than after GPVI stimulation.