Clinical sensitivity and specificity of multiple T2-hyperintensities on brain magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type 1 in children: diagnostic accuracy study

Using a semi-automated approach to quantify Unidentified Bright Objects in Neurofibromatosis type 1 and linkages to cognitive and academic outcomes

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal dominant neurocutaneous syndrome that affects multiple organ systems resulting in widespread symptoms, including cognitive deficits. In addition to the criteria required for an NF1 diagnosis, approximately 70% of children with NF1 present with Unidentified Bright Objects (UBOs) or Focal Areas of Signal Intensity, which are hyperintense bright spots seen on T2-weighted magnetic resonance images and seen more prominently on FLAIR magnetic resonance images (Sabol et al., 2011). Current findings relating the presence/absence, quantities, sizes, and locations of these bright spots to cognitive abilities are mixed. To contribute to and hopefully disentangle some of these mixed findings, we explored potential relationships between metrics related to UBOs and cognitive abilities in a sample of 28 children and adolescents with NF1 (M=12.52 years; SD=3.18 years; 16 male). We used the Lesion Segmentation Tool (LST) to automatically detect and segment the UBOs. The LST was able to qualitatively and quantitatively reliably detect UBOs in images of children with NF1. Using these automatically detected and segmented lesions, we found that while controlling for age, biological sex, perceptual IQ, study, and scanner, "total UBO volume", defined as the sum of all the voxels representing all of the UBOs for each participant, helped explain differences in word reading, phonological awareness, and visuospatial skills. These findings contribute to the emerging NF1 literature and help parse the specific deficits that children with NF1 have, to then help improve the efficacy of reading interventions for children with NF1.

A preliminary study of the different memory systems in neurofibromatosis type 1: What is impaired and what is spared?

BACKGROUND

Since 1990's, the cognitive profile of children with a neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) has been refined by many different studies. Children with NF1 may exhibit a variety of cognitive dysfunctions. Memory difficulties have been reported, but the results are contradictory and, compared to other cognitive functions, memory has been less evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the memory profile in NF1 with a particular population, children with NF1 without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

METHODS

Eighteen children with NF1 without ADHD and eighteen typically developing aged from 8 to 12.6 years were compared in terms of both their verbal and visual working memory, anterograde memory, and procedural perceptual-motor memory. We also assessed semantic and autobiographical memory.

RESULTS

Our results indicate the existence of memory difficulties in children with NF1 without ADHD in verbal working and anterograde memory but not in terms of the visual domain. They also experienced difficulties recalling personal memories but these were improved by cueing. However, semantic memory and procedural perceptual-motor memory was preserved.

CONCLUSIONS

These results highlight a difference between memory systems in children with NF1 without ADHD and the importance to assess the different memory systems, the nature of information and the processes in long-term memory in NF1 population. However, our results raise questions about the possible links between these difficulties and the executive functions. The specifics of memory profile in children with NF1 must be taken into consideration in these children's clinical follow-up, in order to understand their learning difficulties and to make adaptations to their care.

Evaluation of the sense of taste and smell in patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 1

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine if patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) have an impaired sense of smell or taste. Neurofibromin, the NF1gene protein product is ubiquitous in the body and is especially associated with the development of neurogenetic structures. Lately enlarged olfactory bulbs have been described in patients with NF1. Until now, there is no study to evaluate the sense of smell and taste in patients with NF1.

METHOD

This study has been approved by the Hamburg Ethics committee. An evaluation of the sense of smell and taste was undertaken in 26 patients with NF1 using the Burghart Sniffin' Sticks. Three patients were excluded due to a prior infection with the Corona virus. As a control group the same examination was performed in healthy individuals (same sex/ same age as the NF1 patients) by the same examiner.

RESULTS

The results show a normal sense of smell in patients with NF1. The morphologic finding of enlarged olfactory bulbs seem to have no functional equivalent. However, 8 out of 23 patients with NF1 had difficulties identifying at least one taste flavor. In total 9.8% of possible taste qualities were misidentified. In the healthy control group, all taste qualities were identified correctly. Considering each taste quality as separate case, a significant difference in the taste function was identified based on Fisher's exact test (p=0.003).

CONCLUSION

The current study does not show a correlation between NF1 and an impaired sense of smell. Yet significant reduction in the sense of taste was found in the patients with NF1. Further research will have to be conducted to find the underlying causal pathways.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

NF1 is recently being acknowledged not only for its' macroscopic aesthetic and functional impairments, but also as a neurodevelopmental disorder. Evaluating the neural structures in regard to their function is a first step in understanding more about the disease.

The role of visual electrodiagnostics in management of children with neurofibromatosis type 1

PURPOSE

To evaluate the role of visual electrodiagnostic testing in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) despite improved accessibility to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

The records from 39 children (78 eyes, 15 boys, 24 girls, average age at last visit of 11.5 ± 4.3 years, average follow-up time of 7.8 ± 3.9 years) with genetically confirmed NF1 were retrospectively analysed. They all underwent a thorough ophthalmological investigation, including age-appropriate visual acuity testing, anterior segment evaluation for Lisch nodules and a dilated fundus examination. If children were cooperative enough, colour vision was tested using the Hardy-Rand-Rittler test, visual fields were evaluated with Goldmann perimetry. All performed MRI of the brain and orbits as part of the standard of care protocol. Visual electrodiagnostics included electroretinography (ERG) and visual evoked potentials (VEP) using a standard protocol in older children, whereas with less cooperative children a modified protocol according to the Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH protocol) was used.

RESULTS

The average visual acuity was 0.8 ± 0.3, colour vision was abnormal in 6%, perimetry in 8%, Lisch nodules were present in 62%, and the optic disc was pale in 66% of all eyes. Plexiform neurofibroma of the eyelid/orbit was present in 4%. Optic pathway glioma (OPG) was detected with MRI in 22 (57%) and in 6/22 treatment was indicated. Other intracranial NF1-related lesions were documented in 70% of children. VEP were abnormal in 16/39 of all children with NF1 (41%) comprising 14/22 (65%) of children with confirmed OPG and 2/17 (12%) of children without OPG. All full-field and pattern ERG responses were within normal limits. All individual VEP results are described and three cases from this cohort of children are presented in detail to illustrate the importance of VEP testing. In Case 1, VEP abnormality suggested subsequent MRI of the brain under general anaesthesia, which was otherwise contraindicated according to normal clinical findings and his young age. In Cases 2 and 3, VEP provided more precise functional information during the follow-up of OPG, while other psychophysical tests remained unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

Electrodiagnostics has multifactorial role and importance in children with NF1, either when visual pathway function is impaired in young children, even before MRI under general anaesthesia and other psychophysical tests can be performed, as well as for a more precise monitoring of the visual pathway function before potential treatment of OPG, or after it, to evaluate its success.

Neuroanatomical correlates of working memory performance in Neurofibromatosis 1

Introduction

Neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) is a single-gene disorder associated with cognitive impairments, particularly with deficits in working memory. Prior research indicates that brain structure is affected in NF1, but it is unclear how these changes relate to aspects of cognition.

Methods

29 adolescents aged 11-17 years were compared to age and sex-matched controls. NF1 subjects were assessed using detailed multimodal measurements of working memory at baseline followed by a 3T MR scan. A voxel-based morphometry approach was used to estimate the total and regional gray matter(GM) volumetric differences between the NF1 and control groups. The working memory metrics were subjected to a principal component analysis (PCA) approach.

Results

The NF1 groups showed increased gray matter volumes in the thalamus, corpus striatum, dorsal midbrain and cerebellum bilaterally in the NF1 group as compared to controls. Principal component analysis on the working memory metrics in the NF1 group yielded three independent factors reflecting high memory load, low memory load and auditory working memory. Correlation analyses revealed that increased volume of posterior cingulate cortex, a key component of the default mode network (DMN) was significantly associated with poorer performance on low working memory load tasks.

Conclusion

These results are consistent with prior work showing larger subcortical brain volumes in the NF1 cohort. The strong association between posterior cingulate cortex volume and performance on low memory load conditions supports hypotheses of deficient DMN structural development, which in turn may contribute to the cognitive impairments in NF1.

Managing Headache Disorders Associated with Tuberous Sclerosis and Neurofibromatosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) and neurofibromatosis (NF) are neurocutaneous disorders often encountered by neurologists in clinical practice. This article aims to familiarize adult and pediatric neurologists with common features of these disorders and headache specific evaluation and management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Non-malignant intracranial tumors in TSC include cortical tubers (glioneuronal hamartomas), subependymal nodules or subependymal giant-cell astrocytomas (SEGA). Headache disorders in TSC are largely secondary and can cause headaches due to increased intracranial pressure, mass effect, obstructive hydrocephalus, or hemorrhage. Neurosurgical intervention is typically required for management of large SEGAs; however, in patients with increased surgical risk, newer treatment modalities may be offered such as neoadjuvant therapy with an mTOR inhibitor (mTORi). Newer studies indicate headache disorders are more prevalent in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Primary headache disorders can include migraine and tension-type headache, while secondary headache disorders can be due to associated neoplasms such as optic pathway gliomas or brainstem gliomas, or less commonly vasculopathies such as moyamoya syndrome. Selumetinib is an oral, small molecule mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) agent with antineoplastic activity which is in ongoing trials for treatment of NF1-associated pediatric low-grade gliomas. NF1 stands out as having a higher association with primary headache disorders such as migraine. This association may be related to effects of mutation of the neurofibromin gene on pathways involved in pain and migraine genesis, however, warrants future study. Care should be taken when formulating a headache treatment plan to address comorbidities and avoid medications that may be contraindicated.

Epilepsy in NF1: Epidemiologic, Genetic, and Clinical Features. A Monocentric Retrospective Study in a Cohort of 784 Patients

An increased lifetime risk of epilepsy has been reported in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) patients, ranging between 4% and 14%. To further analyze the correlation between NF1 and epilepsy, we retrospectively reviewed the epidemiologic, clinical, radiological, and molecular data of 784 unselected patients diagnosed with NF1 and referred to the neurofibromatosis outpatient clinics at the University Hospital of Padua. A crude prevalence of epilepsy of 4.7% was observed. In about 70% of cases, seizures arose in the context of neuroradiological findings, with the main predisposing factors being cerebral vasculopathies and hydrocephalus. In the absence of structural abnormalities, the prevalence of epilepsy was found to be 1.27%, which is approximately equal to the total prevalence in the general population. NF1 patients with seizures exhibit a higher incidence of intellectual disability and/or developmental delay, as well as of isolated learning disabilities. The comparison of causative NF1 mutations between the two groups did not reveal a specific genotype-phenotype correlation. Our data refine the current knowledge on epileptological manifestations in NF1 patients, arguing against the hypothesis that specific mechanisms, inherent to neurofibromin cellular function, might determine an increased risk of epilepsy in this condition.

Are morphological and structural MRI characteristics related to specific cognitive impairments in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) children?

INTRODUCTION

NF1 children have cognitive disorders, especially in executive functions, visuospatial, and language domains, the pathophysiological mechanisms of which are still poorly understood.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A correlation study was performed from neuropsychological assessments and brain MRIs of 38 NF1 patients and 42 controls, all right-handed, aged 8-12 years and matched in age and gender. The most discriminating neuropsychological tests were selected to assess their visuospatial, metaphonological and visuospatial working memory abilities. The MRI analyses focused on the presence and location of Unidentified Bright Objects (UBOs) (1), volume analysis (2) and diffusion analysis (fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity) (3) of the regions of interest including subcortical structures and posterior fossa, as well as shape analysis of subcortical structures (4). The level of attention, intelligence quotient, age and gender of the patients were taken into account in the statistical analysis. Then, we studied how diffusion and volumes parameters were associated with neuropsychological characteristics in NF1 children.

RESULTS

NF1 children present different brain imaging characteristics compared to the control such as (1) UBOs in 68%, (2) enlarged total intracranial volume, involving all subcortical structures, especially thalamus, (3) increased MD and decreased FA in thalamus, corpus callosum and hippocampus. These alterations are diffuse, without shape involvement. In NF1 group, brain microstructure is all the more altered that volumes are enlarged. However, we fail to find a link between these brain characteristics and neurocognitive scores.

CONCLUSION

While NF1 patients have obvious pathological brain characteristics, the neuronal substrates of their cognitive deficits are still not fully understood, perhaps due to complex and multiple pathophysiological mechanisms underlying this disorder, as suggested by the heterogeneity observed in our study. However, our results are compatible with an interpretation of NF1 as a diffuse white matter disease.

Sporadic and Familial Variants in NF1: An Explanation of the Wide Variability in Neurocognitive Phenotype?

Background: Cognitive impairment is the most common neurological manifestation in NF1 and occurs in 30–70% of NF1 cases. The onset and severity of each specific cognitive deficit varies greatly from child to child, with no apparent external causes. The wide variability of phenotype is the most complex aspect in terms of management and care. Despite multiple research, the mechanism underlying the high heterogeneity in NF1 has not yet been elucidated. While many studies have focused on the effects of specific and precise genetic mutations on the NF1 phenotype, little has been done on the impact of NF1 transmission (sporadic vs. familial cases). We used a complete neuropsychological evaluation designed to assess five large cognitive areas: general cognitive functions (WISC-IV and EVIP); reading skills (“L'Alouette,” ODEDYS-2 and Lobrot French reading tests); phonological process (ODEDYS-2 test); visual perceptual skills (JLO, Thurstone and Corsi block tests) and attention (CPT-II), as well as psychosocial adjustments (CBCL) to explore the impact of NF1 transmission on cognitive disease manifestation in 96 children affected by NF1 [55 sporadic cases (29♀, 26♂); 41 familial cases (24♀, 17♂)].

Results: Familial and Sporadic form of NF1 only differ in IQ expression. The families' socioeconomic status (SES) impacts IQ performance but not differently between sporadic and familial variants. However, SES is lower in familial variants than in the sporadic variant of NF1. No other cognitive differences emerge between sporadic and familial NF1.

Conclusions: Inheritance in NF1 failed to explain the phenotype variability in its entirety. IQ differences between groups seems in part linked to the environment where the child grows up. Children with NF1, and especially those that have early diagnoses (most often in inherited cases), must obtain careful monitoring from their early childhood, at home to strengthen investment in education and in school to early detect emerging academic problems and to quickly place them into care.

Trial Registration: IDRCB, IDRCB2008-A01444-51. Registered 19 January 2009.

Chinese patient with neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome caused by novel heterozygous NF1 exons 1-58 deletion: a case report

BACKGROUND

Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome (NFNS) is a rare autosomal dominant hereditary disease. We present a case of NFNS due to the heterozygous deletion of exons 1-58 of the NF1 gene on chromosome 17 in a 15-month-old boy.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 15-month-old boy was admitted for motor and language developmental delay, numerous café-au-lait spots, hypertelorism, left blepharoptosis, pectus excavatum, cryptorchidism, secondary atrial septal defect, and UBOs (undefined bright objects) revealed by cranial MRI T2FLAIR in basal ganglia and cerebellum. Using whole exome sequencing, we identified a de novo heterozygous deletion including exons 1-58 of the NF1 gene.

CONCLUSION

Although genetic tests are useful tools for diagnosis of NFNS, NF1, or NS, comprehensive analysis of genetic factors and phenotypes is indispensable in the clinical practice. To the best of our knowledge, this case presents the first Chinese NFNS case due to NF1 defects, and the NF1 exons 1-58 deletion-related phenotype is unlike any other reported case.

Neurofibromatosis 1 French national guidelines based on an extensive literature review since 1966

Neurofibromatosis type 1 is a relatively common genetic disease, with a prevalence ranging between 1/3000 and 1/6000 people worldwide. The disease affects multiple systems with cutaneous, neurologic, and orthopedic as major manifestations which lead to significant morbidity or mortality. Indeed, NF1 patients are at an increased risk of malignancy and have a life expectancy about 10-15 years shorter than the general population. The mainstay of management of NF1 is a patient-centered longitudinal care with age-specific monitoring of clinical manifestations, aiming at the early recognition and symptomatic treatment of complications as they occur. Protocole national de diagnostic et de soins (PNDS) are mandatory French clinical practice guidelines for rare diseases required by the French national plan for rare diseases. Their purpose is to provide health care professionals with guidance regarding the optimal diagnostic and therapeutic management of patients affected with a rare disease; and thus, harmonizing their management nationwide. PNDS are usually developed through a critical literature review and a multidisciplinary expert consensus. The purpose of this article is to present the French guidelines on NF1, making them even more available to the international medical community. We further dwelled on the emerging new evidence that might have therapeutic potential or a strong impact on NF1 management in the coming feature. Given the complexity of the disease, the management of children and adults with NF1 entails the full complement healthcare providers and communication among the various specialties.

Can the Cognitive Phenotype in Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) Be Explained by Neuroimaging? A Review

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is one of the most frequent monogenetic disorders. It can be associated with cognitive dysfunctions in several domains such as executive functioning, language, visual perception, motor skills, social skills, memory and/or attention. Neuroimaging is becoming more and more important for a clearer understanding of the neural basis of these deficits. In recent years, several studies have used different imaging techniques to examine structural, morphological and functional alterations in NF1 disease. They have shown that NF1 patients have specific brain characteristics such as Unidentified Bright Objects (UBOs), macrocephaly, a higher volume of subcortical structures, microstructure integrity alterations, or connectivity alterations. In this review, which focuses on the studies published after the last 2 reviews of this topic (in 2010 and 2011), we report on recent structural, morphological and functional neuroimaging studies in NF1 subjects, with special focus on those that examine the neural basis of the NF1 cognitive phenotype. Although UBOs are one of the most obvious and visible elements in brain imaging, correlation studies have failed to establish a robust and reproducible link between major cognitive deficits in NF1 and their presence, number or localization. In the same vein, the results among structural studies are not consistent. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies appear to be more sensitive, especially for understanding the executive function deficit that seems to be associated with a dysfunction in the right inferior frontal areas and the middle frontal areas. Similarly, fMRI studies have found that visuospatial deficits could be associated with a dysfunction in the visual cortex and especially in the magnocellular pathway involved in the processing of low spatial frequency and high temporal frequency. Connectivity studies have shown a reduction in anterior-posterior “long-range” connectivity and a deficit in deactivation in default mode network (DMN) during cognitive tasks. In conclusion, despite the contribution of new imaging techniques and despite relative advancement, the cognitive phenotype of NF1 patients is not totally understood.

Neuropsychological profile in Italian children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and their relationships with neuroradiological data: Preliminary results

BACKGROUND

Neurofibromatosis type 1 is a genetic disorder associated with cognitive deficits, learning disabilities and behavioral problems. These domains appear to have a still controversial debated association with local areas of T2-hyperintensities on MRI images, called unidentified bright objects (UBOs).

METHODS

A cohort of 36 children (aged 7-11 years) included consecutively, underwent neuropsychological and behavioral assessment to determine their cognitive and neuropsychological profile, and the frequency of specific learning disabilities. MRI examination was used to determine the impact of UBOs' presence, number, and location on the cognitive, neuropsychological and behavioral profile, and also the presence of optic glioma.

RESULTS

The mean full intelligence quotient was 104.6; only one child had mild intellectual disability. Forty one percent of children had a diagnosis of specific learning disabilities and reading was mainly involved. Twenty per cent had attention problems. All children had normal scores in visuo-motor and visuo-perceptual tests. UBOs were present in 94.0% of the MRI examinations. Two children had optic glioma. Children with UBOs in a specific location and children with UBOs elsewhere were statistically compared, no one of the location seemed to have an impact on general cognition measured with full intelligence quotient. The thalamus was associated with problems in calculation and striatum with behavioral problems. An inverse relationship between the number of UBOs and the full intelligence quotient was present, but without a statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the specific location of UBOs did not seem to influence the general cognitive profile and also the relationship between their number and the full intelligence quotient was not significant; these results are still controversial in literature. Finally, the presence of UBOs in the thalamus and striatum may represent a neuroradiological pattern that influences performances in calculation and behavior respectively in children with Neurofibromatosis type 1.

Increased prevalence of brain tumors classified as T2 hyperintensities in neurofibromatosis 1

Background

We sought to define the radiologic features that differentiate neoplastic from non-neoplastic T2 hyperintensities (T2Hs) in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and identify those lesions most likely to require oncologic surveillance.

Methods

We conducted a single-center retrospective review of all available brain MRIs from 68 children with NF1 (n = 190) and 46 healthy pediatric controls (n = 104). All T2Hs identified on MRI were characterized based on location, border, shape, degree of T1 hypointensity, and presence of mass effect or contrast enhancement, and subsequently classified using newly established radiologic criteria as either unidentified bright objects (UBOs) or probable tumors. Lesion classification was pathologically confirmed in 10 NF1 cases.

Results

T2Hs were a highly sensitive (94.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 86.4%-98.5%) and specific (100.0%; 95% CI 92.3%-100.0%) marker for the diagnosis of NF1. UBOs constituted the majority of T2Hs (82%) and were most frequently located in cerebellar white matter, medial temporal lobe, and thalamus, where they were more likely than probable tumors to be bilateral (p < 0.001) and have nondiscrete borders (p < 0.001). Surprisingly, 57% of children with T2Hs harbored lesions classified as probable tumors, and 28% of children with probable tumors received treatment. In contrast to UBOs, probable tumors were most frequently located within the globus pallidus and medulla, and rarely occurred prior to 3 years of age.

Conclusions

With the implementation of standardized radiologic criteria, a high prevalence of brain tumors was identified in this at-risk population of children, of which nearly one-third required treatment, emphasizing the need for appropriate oncologic surveillance for patients with NF1 harboring nonoptic pathway brain tumors.

Synthetic MRI for Clinical Neuroimaging: Results of the Magnetic Resonance Image Compilation (MAGiC) Prospective, Multicenter, Multireader Trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Synthetic MR imaging enables reconstruction of various image contrasts from 1 scan, reducing scan times and potentially providing novel information. This study is the first large, prospective comparison of synthetic-versus-conventional MR imaging for routine neuroimaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective multireader, multicase noninferiority trial of 1526 images read by 7 blinded neuroradiologists was performed with prospectively acquired synthetic and conventional brain MR imaging case-control pairs from 109 subjects (mean, 53.0 ± 18.5 years of age; range, 19-89 years of age) with neuroimaging indications. Each case included conventional T1- and T2-weighted, T1 and T2 FLAIR, and STIR and/or proton density and synthetic reconstructions from multiple-dynamic multiple-echo imaging. Images were randomized and independently assessed for diagnostic quality, morphologic legibility, radiologic findings indicative of diagnosis, and artifacts.

RESULTS

Clinical MR imaging studies revealed 46 healthy and 63 pathologic cases. Overall diagnostic quality of synthetic MR images was noninferior to conventional imaging on a 5-level Likert scale (P < .001; mean synthetic-conventional, -0.335 ± 0.352; Δ = 0.5; lower limit of the 95% CI, -0.402). Legibility of synthetic and conventional morphology agreed in >95%, except in the posterior limb of the internal capsule for T1, T1 FLAIR, and proton-density views (all, >80%). Synthetic T2 FLAIR had more pronounced artifacts, including +24.1% of cases with flow artifacts and +17.6% cases with white noise artifacts.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall synthetic MR imaging quality was similar to that of conventional proton-density, STIR, and T1- and T2-weighted contrast views across neurologic conditions. While artifacts were more common in synthetic T2 FLAIR, these were readily recognizable and did not mimic pathology but could necessitate additional conventional T2 FLAIR to confirm the diagnosis.

Annual review of children with neurofibromatosis type 1

We aim to provide a concise, evidence-based framework to assist secondary level, community and acute paediatricians during a 20-60 min annual review of children with neurofibromatosis type 1. This review does not cover all aspects of the disorder. We recognise the importance of an overview of the pathogenesis, molecular genetic testing, clinical manifestations and management; we shall cover some of this briefly, but this is not our focus here. We focus instead on the following areas: (A) what questions should be asked during annual review, (B) what should be included in a focused examination, (C) when to request further investigations and (D) when should a referral be made to tertiary specialists and other members of the multidisciplinary team. Ongoing debates regarding screening remain in certain areas, particularly regarding imaging and ophthalmology follow-up; here we summarise the differing opinions and make a recommendation based on the currently available evidence.

Cognitive and psychosocial phenotype of young children with neurofibromatosis-1

Children with neurofibromatosis-1 (NF1), a neurodevelopmental disorder resulting from a mutation of the NF1 gene (17q11.2), often have difficulties with learning and attention, but there is little research in the early childhood years. In this study, the cognitive and psychosocial functioning of 40 young children with NF1 (ages 3 through 6) was examined and compared both to normative data and to a contrast group comprised of unaffected siblings and community members matched for age and socio-economic status (n = 37). Children with NF1 showed significantly weaker cognitive abilities across all domains and for the vast majority of subtests. Consistent with research in older children, a variety of patterns of intra-individual strength and weakness were present for young children with NF1. Few significant group differences in psychosocial functioning were observed, but the children with NF1 showed significantly greater functional communication problems than did the unaffected group. Overall, the results indicate that in participant groups matched for age and socioeconomic status, cognitive vulnerabilities are evident for close to half of young children with NF1, with some relations to psychosocial functioning, particularly functional communication, attention problems and social skills.

Can the diagnosis of NF1 be excluded clinically? A lack of pigmentary findings in families with spinal neurofibromatosis demonstrates a limitation of clinical diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Consensus clinical diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis type I (NF1) include café-au-lait macules and skinfold freckling. The former are frequently the earliest manifestation of NF1, and as such are of particular significance when assessing young children at risk of the condition. A phenotype of predominantly spinal neurofibromatosis has been identified in a small minority of families with NF1, often in association with a relative or absolute lack of cutaneous manifestations. An association with splicing and missense mutations has previously been reported for spinal neurofibromatosis, but on the basis of molecular results in only a few families.

METHOD

Patients with spinal NF1 were identified through the Manchester nationally commissioned service for complex NF1.

RESULTS

Five families with spinal NF1 were identified, with a broad spectrum of NF1 mutations, providing further evidence that this phenotype may arise in association with any genre of mutation in this gene. Pigmentary manifestations were absent or very mild in affected individuals. Several further affected individuals, some with extensive spinal root tumours, were ascertained when additional family members were assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical NF1 consensus criteria cannot be used to exclude the diagnosis of spinal NF1, especially in childhood. This emphasises the importance of molecular confirmation in individuals and families with atypical presentations of NF1.

Modeling cognitive dysfunction in neurofibromatosis-1

Cognitive dysfunction, including significant impairments in learning, behavior, and attention, is found in over 10% of children in the general population. However, in the common inherited cancer predisposition syndrome, neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), the prevalence of these cognitive deficits approaches 70%. As a monogenic disorder, NF1 provides a unique genetic tool to identify and dissect mechanistically the molecular and cellular bases underlying cognitive dysfunction. In this review, we discuss Nf1 fly and mouse systems that mimic many of the cognitive abnormalities seen in children with NF1. Further, we describe discoveries from these models that have uncovered defects in the regulation of Ras activity, cAMP generation, and dopamine homeostasis as key mechanisms important for cognitive dysfunction in children with NF1.