1
|
Nyambayo PPM, Gold MS, Mehta UC, Clarke S, Manyevere R, Chirinda L, Zifamba EN, Nyamandi T. Efficacy and feasibility of SMS m-Health for the detection of adverse events following immunisation (AEFIs) in resource-limited setting-The Zimbabwe stimulated telephone assisted rapid safety surveillance (Zm-STARSS) randomised control trial. Vaccine 2023; 41:6700-6709. [PMID: 37805357 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.09.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The mHealth active participant centred (MAPC) adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) surveillance is a promising area for early AEFI detection resulting in risk minimisation. Passive (spontaneous) AEFI surveillance is the backbone for vaccine pharmacovigilance, but has inherent drawbacks of under reporting, and requires strengthening with active surveillance methods. AIM The Zimbabwe stimulated telephone assisted rapid safety surveillance (Zm-STARSS) randomised controlled trial (RCT) sought to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of AEFI detection using a short message service (SMS) and computer assisted telephone interview (CATI) approach. METHOD A multicentre Zm-STARSS RCT enrolled consented adult vaccinees or parents or guardians of children receiving vaccines, including COVID-19 vaccines, at study vaccination clinics. At enrolment study participants were randomised to either SMS-CATI group or control group. SMS prompts were sent on days 0-2 and 14 post-vaccination to SMS-CATI group to ascertain if a medically attendance or attention due to an Adverse event following immunisation (AEFI) had occurred. However, no SMSs were sent to the control group. SMS-CATI group who responded "Yes" to SMS prompts were interviewed by research healthcare workers (RHCWs) who completed a CATI to determine if an AEFI had occurred whilst an AEFI in control group was determined from passive AEFI reporting channels. The primary study outcome was the AEFI detection rate in the SMS-CATI group compared to the control group. RESULTS A total of 4560 participants were enrolled after signed informed consent, all were encouraged to report AEFIs and randomised automatically on 1:1 basis into two arms SMS CATI intervention group (n = 2280) and a control passive AEFI surveillance group (n = 2280) on day 0. A total of 704 (31 %) participants responded to the SMS prompts, with 75 % (528/704) indicating "No" and 25 % (176/704) reporting "Yes" to seeking medical attention or attendance post-immunisation. 69 % (121/176) completed a CATI survey but in only 36 % (44/121) was the AEFI confirmed. There were no AEFIs reported in control group participants. The detection rate of a AEFI associated with medically attendance or attention using the SMS-CATI methodology was 2 % (44/2280) on an intention to treat cohort. CONCLUSION Despite the low SMS response and CATI completion rate, we demonstrated that Zm-STARSS SMS system improves AEFI detection compared to passive AEFI surveillance. We recommend that this and similar approaches are explored further using cost-effective multi-channel digital approaches for holistic pharmacovigilance to improve AEFI detection in Low Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) for all vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priscilla P M Nyambayo
- Pharmacovigilance and Clinical Trials Division, Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
| | - Michael S Gold
- University of Adelaide, Discipline of Paediatrics, Women's and Children's Health Network, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Ushma C Mehta
- Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Stephen Clarke
- Flexis Systems Pty Ltd, PO Box 352, Mayfield, NSW 2304, Australia
| | - Rumbidzai Manyevere
- Pharmacovigilance and Clinical Trials Division, Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Libert Chirinda
- Pharmacovigilance and Clinical Trials Division, Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Edlyne N Zifamba
- Pharmacovigilance and Clinical Trials Division, Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Tatenda Nyamandi
- Pharmacovigilance and Clinical Trials Division, Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gao D, Dong G, Zhu L, Jia N, Sun B. Analysis of death cases in Shenyang City, China, for immunization adverse event surveillance, 2009-2021. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2263225. [PMID: 37782096 PMCID: PMC10547072 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2263225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Through the Chinese National Immunization Adverse Event Surveillance System (CNAEFIS), we collected reports of Adverse Event Following Immunization (AEFI) deaths in Shenyang from 2009 to 2021 with the aim of analyzing AEFI-related deaths and assessing the safety of vaccination. From 2009 to 2021, a total of 12 AEFI-related deaths were reported in Shenyang City, and autopsies were performed in 6 deaths. According to the assessment of the Expert Committee on Investigation and Diagnosis of AEFI 3 (25.0%) deaths were classified as severe vaccine reactions, 9 (75.0%) deaths were classified as coincidental events, and there were no immunization errors or psychological reactions. The overall estimated AEFI-related mortality rate was 0.12 per 100,000 vaccination doses. Spearman's rank correlation analysis showed no correlation between AEFI, severe vaccine reactions, and suspected vaccination-related deaths. Coincidental events are the most common type of death following vaccination, meaning that the risk of death following immunization is low, and ongoing AEFI surveillance and scientific causality assessment are essential to ensure the vaccine confidence. Detailed pre-vaccination health status questioning is also key to avoiding and reducing adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dongmei Gao
- Immunization Planning Department, Shenyang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenyang, China
| | - Guihua Dong
- Shenyang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenyang, China
| | - Lijun Zhu
- Immunization Planning Department, Shenyang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenyang, China
| | - Nina Jia
- Immunization Planning Department, Shenyang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenyang, China
| | - Baijun Sun
- Shenyang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li-Kim-Moy J, Phillips A, Morgan A, Glover C, Jayasinghe S, Hull BP, Dey A, Beard FH, Hickie M, Macartney K. Disseminated varicella zoster virus infection following live attenuated herpes zoster vaccine: descriptive analysis of reports to Australia's spontaneous vaccine pharmacovigilance system, 2016-2020. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e067287. [PMID: 36707120 PMCID: PMC9884885 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the reported incidence and features of disseminated varicella zoster virus (VZV) infection following live attenuated herpes zoster vaccine live (ZVL: Zostavax, Merck) in immunocompromised people in Australia. DESIGN AND SETTING ZVL was funded in 2016 in Australia for people aged 70 years, with a catch-up programme for those 71-79 years. From 2016 to 2020, three deaths due to disseminated vaccine-strain VZV infection occurred following inadvertent ZVL administration in individuals with varying levels of immunocompromise. This descriptive study examined 4 years of national surveillance data reported to the Therapeutic Goods Administration's Adverse Event Monitoring System (AEMS). Denominator data for rates were from doses recorded in the Australian Immunisation Register. PARTICIPANTS Individuals vaccinated between 1 November 2016 and 31 December 2020 who experienced adverse event(s) following immunisation (AEFI) after ZVL recorded in the AEMS. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Rates and outcomes of confirmed (Oka strain positive) or probable disseminated VZV infection, and inadvertent administration of ZVL in immunocompromised individuals. RESULTS 854 AEFI were reported from 1 089 966 doses of ZVL administered (78.4 per 100 000 doses). Of those, 14 were classified as confirmed (n=6, 0.55 per 100 000) or probable (n=8) disseminated VZV infection. The confirmed cases were all hospitalised, and most (5/6) were immunocompromised; three cases died. Thirty-seven individuals were reported as vaccinated despite a contraindication due to immunocompromise (3.4 per 100 000), with 12/37 (32%) hospitalised. CONCLUSIONS Disseminated VZV is potentially life-threatening and occurs mostly in those with severe immunocompromise. Inadvertent administration of ZVL to immunocompromised individuals has occurred despite initial provider guidance and education. Multiple additional strategies to assist providers to identify contraindications have been implemented to prevent adverse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Li-Kim-Moy
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anastasia Phillips
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Adelaide Morgan
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Catherine Glover
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sanjay Jayasinghe
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Children's Hospital Westmead, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Brynley P Hull
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Aditi Dey
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Frank H Beard
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Megan Hickie
- Medicines Regulation Division, Pharmacovigilance Branch, Therapeutic Goods Administration, Woden, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Kristine Macartney
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Middleton BF, Danchin M, Fathima P, Bines JE, Macartney K, Snelling TL. Review of the health impact of the oral rotavirus vaccine program in children under 5 years in Australia: 2006 - 2021. Vaccine 2023; 41:636-648. [PMID: 36529591 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Revised: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Oral rotavirus vaccines were incorporated into the National Immunisation Program (NIP) for all Australian infants in July 2007. Initially each of the eight jurisdictions implemented Rotarix or RotaTeq rotavirus vaccine, however from July 2017 all states and territories have administered Rotarix only. This review evaluates the health impact of the oral rotavirus vaccine program for Australian children less than 5 years old over the first 15 years of the rotavirus vaccine program, observing long-term changes in rotavirus-related health care attendances, public health notifications, and vaccine effectiveness and safety data for both Rotarix and RotaTeq rotavirus vaccines. We searched Medline for studies published between January 2006 and May 2022 using the search terms 'rotavirus', 'rotavirus vaccine' and 'Australia'. Of 491 items identified, 76 items - 36 peer-reviewed articles and 40 reports - were included in the review. We found evidence that the introduction of the oral rotavirus vaccine program in Australia was associated with a prompt reduction in rotavirus-coded and all-cause gastroenteritis hospitalisations of vaccine-eligible children. In the context of less complete coverage, reduced vaccine timeliness and lower vaccine effectiveness, a less substantial and inconsistent reduction in severe rotavirus disease was observed among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children, particularly those living in rural and remote northern Australia. Additional studies report no evidence for the emergence of non-vaccine serotypes and/ or replacement serotypes in Australia during the vaccine era. While the health impact for young children and consequent cost-savings of the oral rotavirus vaccine program have been high, it is important to find strategies to improve rotavirus vaccine impact for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations to ensure health benefits for all Australian children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca F Middleton
- Global and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
| | - Margie Danchin
- Vaccine Uptake Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of General Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Parveen Fathima
- Health and Clinical Analytics, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Julie E Bines
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Infection and Immunity, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Gastroenterology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kristine Macartney
- Department of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance (NCIRS), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Thomas L Snelling
- Health and Clinical Analytics, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Phillips A, Carlson S, Danchin M, Beard F, Macartney K. From program suspension to the pandemic: A qualitative examination of Australia's vaccine pharmacovigilance system over 10 years. Vaccine 2021; 39:5968-5981. [PMID: 34376308 PMCID: PMC8445694 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.07.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 06/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2010, the Australian seasonal influenza vaccination program for children under 5 years of age was suspended due to an unexpected increase in fever and febrile convulsions causally associated with one particular influenza vaccine brand. A subsequent national review made seven recommendations to improve vaccine pharmacovigilance. Ten years on, in advance of implementing the COVID-19 immunisation program, we evaluated views on the capacity of Australia's vaccine pharmacovigilance system to promptly detect, examine and communicate a signal. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted between July and October 2020 with individuals with expertise in vaccine safety in Australia using an interview guide informed by key Australian and international frameworks. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was used to code data using a deductive approach. RESULTS Interviews with seventeen participants enabled six themes to be identified. Participants described improvement and significant innovation within Australia's vaccine pharmacovigilance system over the decade since 2010, particularly through establishment of a new active, cohort event monitoring system using short message service surveys. Participants thought Australia had a good foundation for COVID-19 vaccine safety surveillance; implementation of the COVID-19 immunisation program was seen as a potential driver for ongoing enhancement through: a) improved integration of the active surveillance and spontaneous reporting systems, and; b) development of population-level active surveillance, including through data linkage. Transparent communication was considered essential to address the unprecedented challenges of COVID-19 and broader vaccine safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS Vaccine safety experts in Australia convey confidence in the innovative pharmacovigilance systems implemented over the past 10 years. While Australia has a multifaceted system incorporating both active surveillance and spontaneous reporting systems, COVID-19 vaccine implementation represents an opportunity to enhance current systems and to develop new, systematic approaches to vaccine pharmacovigilance that should make both a local and global contribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia Phillips
- The University of Sydney, School of Public Health, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia; National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia; Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia 6009, Australia.
| | - Samantha Carlson
- Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia 6009, Australia
| | - Margie Danchin
- Vaccine and Immunisation Research Group (VIRGo), Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of General Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Paediatrics and School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Frank Beard
- The University of Sydney, School of Public Health, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia; National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia
| | - Kristine Macartney
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia; The University of Sydney, Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hu R, Peng S, Liu Y, Tang F, Wang Z, Zhang L, Gao J, Guo H. The characteristics and trend of adverse events following immunization reported by information system in Jiangsu province, China, 2015-2018. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:1338. [PMID: 34229643 PMCID: PMC8261926 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11387-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Adverse events following immunization is an important factor influencing public trust in vaccination. Publicizing its incidence timely can increase public trust. The aim of this study is to describe the incidence and characteristics of adverse events following immunization in Jiangsu province of China from 2015 to 2018. METHODS All information of adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) was gained from Jiangsu Province Vaccination Integrated Service Management Information System. The reported AEFI trend was analyzed using Chi-square test. RESULTS A total of 77,980 AEFI cases were reported through the AEFI system; Among which, 77,731 were classified as non-serious AEFI cases and 249 were serious AEFI cases. The male to female ratio was 1.31:1, cases less than 7 years old accounted for 97.7%. The total estimated AEFI rate was 62.70/100,000 doses. By severity, 60.75/100,000, 4.46/100,000 and 0.11/100,000 AEFI cases were common vaccine reaction, rare vaccine reaction, and serious rare vaccine reaction, respectively. The top two serious AEFI were thrombocytopenic purpura and febrile. The incidence rates showed the increasing trend and the linear trend of the increasing incidence rates passed the significant test at 0.05 levels. CONCLUSION The sensitivity of AEFI monitoring in Jiangsu Province is increasing and higher than the national average and most countries. The majority of AEFI cases were common adverse reactions, while the serious vaccine reactions caused by vaccines were extremely low. To elevate the sensitivity of AEFI surveillance may reduce the incidence of developing serious AEFI cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ran Hu
- Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China
| | - Shanshan Peng
- Department of Hepatology, The Second Hospital of Nanjing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Yuanbao Liu
- Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China
| | - Fengyang Tang
- Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China
| | - Zhiguo Wang
- Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China
| | - Jun Gao
- Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China
| | - Hongxiong Guo
- Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Efficacy of m-Health for the detection of adverse events following immunization - The stimulated telephone assisted rapid safety surveillance (STARSS) randomised control trial. Vaccine 2020; 39:332-342. [PMID: 33279317 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.11.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Revised: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Passive surveillance is recommended globally for the detection of adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) but this has significant challenges. Use of Mobile health for vaccine safety surveillance enables a consumer-centred approach to reporting. The Stimulated Telephone Assisted Rapid Safety Surveillance (STARSS) a randomised control trial (RCT) sought to evaluate the efficacy and acceptability of SMS for AEFI surveillance. METHODS Multi-centre RCT, participants were adult vaccinees or parents of children receiving any vaccine at a trial site. At enrolment randomisation occurred to one of two SMS groups or a control group. Prompts on days 2, 7 and 14 post-immunisation, were sent to the SMS group, to ascertain if a medical event following immunisation (MEFI) had occurred. No SMS's were sent to the control participants. Those in the SMS who notified an MEFI were pre-randomised to complete a computer assisted telephone interview or a web based report to determine if an AEFI had occurred whilst an AEFI in the controls was determined by a search for passive reports. The primary outcome was the AEFI detection rate in the SMS group compared to controls. RESULTS We enrolled 6,338 participants, who were equally distributed across groups and who received 11,675 vaccines. The SMS group (4,225) received 12,675 surveillance prompts with 9.8% being non-compliant and not responding. In those that responded 90% indicated that no MEFI had been experienced and 184 had a verified AEFI. 6 control subjects had a reported AEFI. The AEFI detection rate was 13 fold greater in the SMS group when compared with controls (4.3 vs 0.3%). CONCLUSION We have demonstrated that the STARSS methodology improves AEFI detection. Our findings should inform the wider use of SMS-based surveillance which is particularly relevant since establishing robust and novel pharmacovigilance systems is critical to monitoring novel vaccines which includes potential COVID vaccines.
Collapse
|
8
|
Adverse events following HPV vaccination: 11 years of surveillance in Australia. Vaccine 2020; 38:6038-6046. [PMID: 32709432 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.06.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Revised: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Australia was the first country to implement a fully funded vaccination program with quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine (4vHPV) in 2007, including males from 2013. We examined adverse events (AE) following vaccination with 4vHPV from 11 years of post-marketing data, focusing on a period of enhanced surveillance and adverse events of special interest (AESI). METHODS AE following 4vHPV doses administered between April 2007 and December 2017 reported to Australia's national regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration, were examined; reports collected during enhanced surveillance in 2013 and 2014 were analyzed separately. Age and sex-specific rates, using denominator data from the national HPV vaccination register, were determined. Pre-specified AESI were identified using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA®) Preferred Terms and examined in detail. FINDINGS Following nine million doses of 4vHPV vaccine administered in Australia, 4551 AE reports were identified. The crude reporting rate was 39.8 per 100 000 doses in the funded cohorts, excluding the enhanced surveillance period. The reported rate of syncope in 12 to 13-year-old males and females was 29.6 per 100 000 doses during enhanced surveillance and 7.1 per 100 000 doses during the remaining study period; rates of syncope were higher in younger compared to older adolescents. The rate of anaphylaxis (0.32 per 100 000 doses) was consistent with published rates. Other AESI including autoimmune disease, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, primary ovarian insufficiency, Guillain-Barré syndrome, complex regional pain syndrome and venous thromboembolism, were reported at low rates and analysis did not reveal unexpected patterns that would suggest causal association. INTERPRETATION AESI, apart from syncope, were reported rarely. The higher rate of syncope among younger adolescents highlights the need for management protocols to prevent syncope-related injury. Analysis of this large, longitudinal dataset in a country with high vaccine uptake, including a period of enhanced surveillance, affirms the safety profile of 4vHPV.
Collapse
|
9
|
Totterdell J, Phillips A, Glover C, Chidwick K, Marsh J, Snelling T, Macartney K. Safety of live attenuated herpes zoster vaccine in adults 70-79 years: A self-controlled case series analysis using primary care data from Australia's MedicineInsight program. Vaccine 2020; 38:3968-3979. [PMID: 32284271 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.03.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2020] [Revised: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Australia introduced a funded shingles vaccination program for older adults in November 2016, administered predominantly in primary care clinics. MedicineInsight, a nationally representative primary care database, was used to investigate the risk of pre-specified outcomes following live attenuated herpes zoster vaccine (ZVL) in Australia. METHODS Individuals aged 70-79 years who received ZVL between 1 November 2016 and 31 July 2018 were identified from MedicineInsight. The self-controlled case series (SCCS) method was used to estimate the seasonally-adjusted relative incidence (RI) of seven pre-specified outcome events (injection site reaction (ISR) [positive control], burn [negative control], myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, rash, rash with an antiviral prescription, and clinical attendance) during a plausible post-vaccination at-risk window compared with times distant from vaccination. Sensitivity analyses examined the effect of common concomitant vaccinations and restriction to first outcome events. RESULTS A total of 332,988 vaccination encounters among 150,054 individuals were identified during the study period; over 2 million clinical attendances were observed. There was an increased RI of ISR in the seven days following ZVL (RI = 77.4, 95% CI 48.1-124.6); the RI of clinical attendance (RI = 0.94, 95% CI 0.94-0.95) and stroke (RI = 0.58, 95% CI 0.44-0.78) were lower in the 42 days following administration of ZVL compared to control periods. There was no evidence of a change in the RI of MI (RI = 0.74, 95% CI 0.41-1.33), rash (RI = 0.97, 95% CI 0.88-1.08), or rash with antiviral prescription (RI = 0.83, 95% CI 0.62-1.10) in the 42 days following ZVL compared to control periods. CONCLUSION No new safety concerns were identified for ZVL in this study based on a novel, Australian primary care data source. An expected increased risk of ISR was identified; findings in relation to cardiovascular disease were reassuring but require confirmation using additional data, including hospital records.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Totterdell
- Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines & Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, 15 Hospital Ave, Nedlands, Western Australia 6009, Australia
| | - Anastasia Phillips
- Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines & Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, 15 Hospital Ave, Nedlands, Western Australia 6009, Australia; The University of Sydney, School of Public Health, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia; National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Cnr Hawkesbury Rd & Hainsworth St, Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia.
| | - Catherine Glover
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Cnr Hawkesbury Rd & Hainsworth St, Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia
| | - Kendal Chidwick
- NPS MedicineWise, Level 7 / 418a Elizabeth St Surry Hills, New South Wales 2010, Australia
| | - Julie Marsh
- Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines & Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, 15 Hospital Ave, Nedlands, Western Australia 6009, Australia
| | - Tom Snelling
- Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines & Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, 15 Hospital Ave, Nedlands, Western Australia 6009, Australia; Perth Children's Hospital, 15 Hospital Ave, Nedlands, Western Australia 6009, Australia; Curtin University, School of Public Health, Bentley, Western Australia 6102, Australia; Menzies School of Health Research and Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Kristine Macartney
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Cnr Hawkesbury Rd & Hainsworth St, Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia; The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dey A, Wang H, Quinn H, Pillsbury A, Glover C, Hickie M, Wood N, Beard F, Macartney K. Surveillance of adverse events following immunisation in Australia: annual report, 2018. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 44. [PMID: 32178607 DOI: 10.33321/cdi.2020.44.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
This report summarises Australian spontaneous surveillance data for adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) for 2018 reported to the Therapeutic Goods Administration and describes reporting trends over the 19-year period 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2018. There were 4221 AEFI records for vaccines administered in 2018, an annual AEFI reporting rate of 16.9 per 100,000 population. There was a 2.9% increase in the overall AEFI reporting rate in 2018 compared to 2017. This slight increase in reported adverse events in 2018 was likely due to new additions to the National Immunisation Program schedule, namely meningococcal ACWY vaccination for children aged 12 months, enhanced immunogenicity trivalent influenza vaccines for adults aged ≥65 years, and state- and territory-funded seasonal influenza vaccination programs for children aged 6 months to <5 years. AEFI reporting rates for most individual vaccines in 2018 were similar to 2017. The most commonly reported adverse events were injection site reaction (34%), pyrexia (15%), rash (15%), vomiting (8%), headache (6%) and pain (6%). Two deaths were reported to the TGA but no clear causal relationship with vaccination was found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditi Dey
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, The University of Sydney and The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Han Wang
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, The University of Sydney and The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Helen Quinn
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, The University of Sydney and The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexis Pillsbury
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, The University of Sydney and The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Catherine Glover
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, The University of Sydney and The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Megan Hickie
- Pharmacovigilance and Special Access Branch, Therapeutic Goods Administration, Department of Health, Canberra, Australia
| | - Nicholas Wood
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, The University of Sydney and The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Frank Beard
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, The University of Sydney and The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kristine Macartney
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, The University of Sydney and The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|