Cervical pedicle screw insertion using the technique with direct exposure of the pedicle by laminoforaminotomy

The Attallah screw: Where safety meets robustness in posterior subaxial cervical instrumentation

Posterior fixation of the subaxial cervical spine (SCS) commonly relies on the application of lateral mass screws (LMS), with pedicle screws being a less prevalent alternative. The present study provides another option: A recently introduced novel approach, the Attallah screw, intended to ensure a safety profile comparable to that of LMS, combined with a strength profile similar to that of pedicle screws. The focus of the present study is the comparative analysis of peak insertion torques for these three screw types. Employing standard surgical techniques and instruments, Attallah screws were scheduled for insertion on the right side of the SCS in 15 cadavers, pedicle screws on the left side in 8 cadavers, and LMS on the left side in the remaining 7 cadavers. The peak insertion torque was recorded using an electronic torque screwdriver. The results revealed that the peak insertion torques were similar in the pedicle and the Attallah screw at C3, C4 and C7, but differed at C5 (mean ± SD; pedicle, 79.5±19.6 cNm; Attallah, 56.7±18.5 cNm; P=0.029) and C6 (pedicle, 85.4±28.7 cNm; Attallah, 49.8±17.9 cNm; P=0.004) in favor of the superior pedicle screw measurements. The peak insertion torques of the pedicle screw were superior to the corresponding data from the LMS from C4 to C7. By contrast, the peak insertion torques of the Attallah screw were only superior to those of the LMS at C7 (Attallah, 69.5±24.5 cNm; lateral mass, 40.5±21.4 cNm; P=0.030), although similar trends were observed at the other cervical levels. On the whole, the findings presented herein indicate the level-dependent superior robustness of the Attallah screw as a posterior cervical fixation method compared to the LMS. However, from a biomechanical perspective, the pedicle screw remains the preeminent choice for fixation within the C5-C6 range.

Anatomical and Technical Considerations of Robot-Assisted Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement: A Cadaveric Study

STUDY DESIGN

Cadaver study.

OBJECTIVES

Assess the feasibility of robot-assisted cervical pedicle screw (RA-CPS) placement and understand the anatomical considerations of this technique.

METHODS

Four cadaver specimens free from bony pathology were acquired. Anatomical considerations, such as pedicle width (PW) and height (PH), transverse pedicle angle (TPA), and maximal screw length (MSL), were recorded from preoperative computational tomography (CT) scans. Intraoperative cone-beam CT was acquired and registered to the robotic system. After cervical levels were segmented, screw sizes and trajectories were planned, and RA-CPS were placed. Accuracy was assessed using Gertzbein and Robbin's classification on postoperative CT scans.

RESULTS

Thirty-five RA-CPS were placed. Major breaches (≥Grade C) occurred in 28.57% screws. Grade A or B accuracy was found in 71.43% of screws, with the most common direction of breach being medial (81.3%). The greatest proportion of breach per level occurred in the upper subaxial levels, (C3:71.4%, C4 66.6%, C5:50%) which had the smallest PW (C3: 4.34 ± .96 mm, C4: 4.48 ± .60, C5: 5.76 ± 1.11). PH was greatest at C2 (8.14 ± 1.89 mm) and ranged subaxial from 6.36 mm (C3) to 7.48 mm (C7). The mean PW was 5.37 mm and increased caudally from 4.34 mm (C3) to 6.31 mm (C7). The mean TPA was 39.9° and decreased moving caudally 46.9°) to C7 (34.4°). The MSL was 37.1 mm and increased from C2 (26.3 mm) to C7 (41.0 mm).

CONCLUSION

RA-CPS has the potential to be feasible, but technological and instrument modifications are necessary to increase the accuracy in the cervical region.

Assessment of Biomechanical Advantages in Combined Anterior-Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery by Radiological Outcomes: Pedicle Screws over Lateral Mass Screws

BACKGROUND

The combined anterior-posterior approach has shown good clinical outcomes for multilevel cervical diseases. This work describes the biomechanical advantage of cervical-pedicle-screw fixation over lateral-mass-screw fixation in combined anterior-posterior cases.

METHOD

Seventy-six patients who received combined cervical surgery from June 2013 to December 2020 were included. The patients were divided into two groups: the lateral-mass-screw group (LMS) and the pedicle-screw group (PPS). Radiological outcomes were assessed with lateral cervical spine X-rays for evaluating sagittal alignment, subsidence, and bone remodeling.

RESULTS

At 1 year postoperatively, the numbers of patients whose C2-C7 cervical lordosis was less than 20 degrees decreased by more in the PPS group (p-value = 0.001). The amount of vertical-length change from immediately to 1 year postsurgery was less in the PPS group than in the LMS group (p-value = 0.030). The mean vertebral-body-width change was larger in the PPS group than in the LMS group during 3 months to 1 year postsurgery (p-value = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

In combined anterior-posterior cervical surgery cases, maintenance of cervical lordosis and protection of the vertebral body from subsidence were better with the pedicle-screw fixation. More bone remodeling occurred when using the pedicle-screw fixation method.

Robotic-guided placement of cervical pedicle screws: feasibility and accuracy

INTRODUCTION

It has been shown that pedicle screw instrumentation in the cervical spine has superior biomechanical pullout strength and stability. However, due to the complex and variable anatomy of the cervical pedicles and the risk of catastrophic complications, cervical pedicle screw placement is not widely utilized.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective, consecutive patient review.

OBJECTIVE

To review and report our experience with robotic guided cervical pedicle screw placement.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed preoperative and postoperative CT scans of 12 consecutive patients who underwent cervical pedicle screw fixation with robotic guidance. Screw placement and deviation from the preoperative plan were assessed using the robotic system's planning software by fusing the preoperative CT (with the planned cervical pedicle screws) to the post-op CT. This process was carried out by manually aligning the anatomical landmarks on the two CTs. Once a satisfactory fusion was achieved, the software's measurement tool was used manually to compare the planned vs. actual screw placements in the axial, sagittal and coronal planes within the instrumented pedicle in a resolution of 0.1 mm. Medical charts were reviewed for technical issues and intra-operative complications.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight cervical pedicle screws were reviewed in 12 patients; mean age = 65 years, M:F = 2:1, and mean BMI = 27.99. No intra-operative complications related to the cervical pedicle screw placement were reported. Robotic guidance was successful in all 88 screws: eight in C2, 14 in C3, 16 in each of C4 and C5, 19 in C6, and 15 at C7. There were 14 pedicle screw breaches (15.9%); all were medial, less than 1 mm, and with no clinical consequences. In the axial plane, the screws deviated from the preoperative plan by 1.32 ± 1.17 mm and in the sagittal plane by 1.27 ± 1.00 mm. In the trajectory view, the overall deviation was 2.20 ± 1.17 mm. Although differences were observed in screw deviation from the pre-op plan between the right and left sides, they were not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that robotic-guided cervical pedicle screw placement is feasible and safe. The medial breaches did not result in any clinical consequences.

Medial Pedicle Pivot Point Using Preoperative Computed Tomography Morphometric Measurements for Cervical Pedicle Screw Insertion: A Novel Technique and Case Series

This study describes a new and safe freehand cervical pedicle screw insertion technique using preoperative computed tomography (CT) morphometric measurements as a guide and a medial pedicle pivot point (MPPP) during the procedure. This study included 271 pedicles at 216 cervical spine levels (mean: 4.75 pedicles per patient). A pedicle diameter (PD) ≥ 3.5 mm was the cut-off for pedicle screw fixation. The presence and grade of perforation were detected using postoperative CT scans, where perforations were graded as follows: 0, no perforation; 1, perforation < 0.875 mm; 2, perforation 0.875-1.75 mm; and 3, perforation > 1.75 mm. The surgical technique involved the use of an MPPP, which was the point at which the lines representing the depth of the lateral mass and total length of the pedicle intersected, deep in the lateral mass. The overall success rate was 96.3% (261/271, Grade 0 or 1 perforations). In total, 54 perforations occurred, among which 44 (81.5%) were Grade 1 and 10 (18.5%) were Grade 2. The most common perforation direction was medial (39/54, 72.2%). The freehand technique for cervical pedicle screw fixation using the MPPP may allow for a safe and accurate procedure in patients with a PD ≥3.5 mm.

Comparison of the maximum possible lengths of insertable screws in the Subaxial Cervical Spine

BACKGROUND

Lateral mass screws are the most commonly used fixation technique in the Subaxial Cervical Spine (SCS), their main advantages being that they are easy to insert and safe in their application. Pedicle screws are significantly longer, are quite challenging to insert in most settings and are accompanied by the risk of serious complications such as vascular and neural injuries. We have therefore developed a new technique, which permits safe insertion of long screws in the SCS.

METHODS

A radiological evaluation was carried out to determine the maximum possible insertable screw length in the SCS when using the following techniques: pedicle, lateral mass (Magerl's) and "Attallah" screws. Scans of 66 cervical spines were analyzed to determine the maximum possible screw lengths of all three screw insertion techniques, based on the standard description through the vertebrae from C3 to C7.

RESULTS

The maximum possible length of the Attallah screw of 20.7 ± 2.5 mm (mean value ± SD) is only 2.4 mm shorter than the pedicle screw (23.1 ± 1.8 mm) along the SCS. The lateral mass screw is with 10.2 ± 1.3 mm full 12.9 mm shorter than the pedicle screw.

CONCLUSIONS

The maximum possible length of the Attallah screw is close to that of the pedicle screw and significantly greater than that of the lateral mass screw. We provide a fixation method comparable to the pedicle screw in its strength and to the lateral mass screw in its safety.

Versatile Usage of the Modified Lateral Mass Screw as an Alternative to Cervical Pedicle Screw Fixation

OBJECTIVE

 Posterior subaxial cervical screw fixation is commonly performed using the cervical pedicle screws (CPS) and lateral mass screws (LMS); however, their compatibility is low. Modified lateral mass screws (mLMS, also called paravertebral foramen screw) fixation was introduced as a salvage technique for LMS fixation and has features of both LMS and CPS techniques. In the present study, the use of mLMS as an alternative to CPS was analyzed based on clinical results.

METHODS

 Seventy-eight screws (38 CPSs and 40 mLMSs) were inserted into 12 patients. The misplacement of the screws was evaluated by computed tomography (CT). The failure of instrumentation and instability were evaluated using plain radiographs.

RESULTS

 The total number of CPS misplacements was 3 (10.5%); however, neurologic complications were not observed. mLMSs were used in the middle segments of the fusion in 10 patients and 2 patients had mLMS fixation for single-level fusion. An additional bridging implant was not required for connecting both CPSs and mLMSs. Instability was not observed during the observation period (4-51 months). Complete fusion was seen in 10 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

 The alternative mLMS fixation can decrease the risk of screw misplacement compared with CPS fixation alone and achieves adequate stability leading to fusion.

Free-Hand Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement by Using Para-articular Minilaminotomy: Its Feasibility and Novice Neurosurgeons' Experience

STUDY DESIGN.

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE.

Cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement is technically demanding because of the great variation in pedicle size, dimension, and angulations between cervical levels and patients and the lack of anatomical landmarks. This retrospective study was conducted to analyze novice neurosurgeons' experience of CPS placement by using the technique with direct exposure of pedicle via para-articular minilaminotomy.

METHODS.

We retrospectively reviewed 78 CPSs in 22 consecutive patients performed by 2 surgeons. All pedicle screws were inserted under the direct visualization of the pedicle by using para-articular minilaminotomy without any fluoroscopic guidance. We analyzed the direction and grade of pedicle perforation on the postoperative computed tomography scan. The degree of perforation was classified as grade 0 to 3. Grades 0 and 1 were classified as the correct position and the others, as the incorrect position.

RESULTS.

In total, the correct position (grade 0 and 1) was found in 72 (92.3%) screws and the incorrect position (grade 2 and 3) in 6 (7.7%). Among the 16 pedicle perforations (grade 1, 2, and 3 perforations), the directions were lateral in 15 (93.8%) and superior in 1 (6.2%). There were no neurovascular complications related to CPS insertion.

CONCLUSION.

Free-hand CPS placement by using para-articular minilaminotomy seems to be feasible and reproducible.

Safety and Feasibility of Cervical Pedicle Screw Insertion in Pediatric Subaxial Cervical Spine Without Navigation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The use of cervical pedicle screws (CPSs) in pediatric subaxial cervical spine has been scarcely reported in the literature. The biomechanical superiority of CPS over other methods of fixation is beneficial in surgery for correcting severe, rigid cervical/cervicothoracic deformity. Our study aims to assess the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of CPS fixation in pediatric subaxial cervical spine without intraoperative navigation.

METHODS

Eight pediatric patients requiring rigid subaxial cervical spine fixation for complex cervical deformities were operated at a single center between 2014 and 2016. Their hospital records and imaging were retrospectively studied. The feasibility of inserting CPS was assessed by studying pedicle morphometry on preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Aberrant vertebral artery anatomy was ruled out using CT angiography. CPS were inserted into selected pedicles without navigation. Postoperative CT scans were studied to look for screw containment within pedicles. Complications were noted and clinicoradiologic follow-up was for a minimum of 36 months.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven CPS were inserted in 8 pediatric patients with a mean age of 9.2 years (range: 5 to 13 y). Surgery was done for complex cervical deformities due to various causes-neglected cervical spine trauma (n=3), posttubercular kyphosis (n=2), cervicothoracic scoliosis (n=2), and cervicothoracic osteoblastoma (n=1). The level-wise distribution of the inserted CPS was: C3=4, C4=6, C5=10, C6=10, and C7=7. Postoperative CT scans showed grade-1 medial cortical breach in 5/37 screws and grade-2 medial cortical breach in a single screw (16%). No perioperative complications were noted. At a mean follow-up of 3.6 years (range: 3 to 4.33 y), no patient had implant failure or deformity progression.

CONCLUSIONS

CPS insertion in pediatric subaxial cervical spine without neuronavigation is safe, feasible, and effective in carefully selected cases. Biomechanical advantages of CPS can be extended to the pediatric subaxial cervical spine.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-retrospective cohort.

[Assessment of the safety and accuracy of implantation of screws into the C2 vertebra using individual 3D-navigation matrices]

Introduction

Individual 3D-navigation matrices are valuable to increase the safety of screw implantation into the axis.

Objective

To analyze safety and accuracy of screw deployment into the axis using individual 3D-navigation matrices compared to free hand technique.

Material and methods

A retrospective analysis included 23 patients (group 1) who underwent implantation of 44 screws into the axis using the «free hand» technique. The screws were installed along the transpedicular or pars trajectory. A prospective analysis enrolled 17 patients (group 2) who underwent installation of 34 screws using individual navigation matrices. 3D-printing technology was applied for manufacturing these matrices. Implantation results were evaluated considering postoperative CT data and SGT (Screw Guide Template) system.

Results

In the 1st group («free hand»), grade 0 and 1 (no malposition or less than 50% of screw diameter) were recorded for 29 (65.91%) screws, grade 2 - for 13 (29.55%) screws, grade 3 - for 2 (4.45%) screws. Intraoperative injury of the vertebral artery without postoperative neurological deficit occurred in 4 (8.89%) patients. In the 2nd group, 97% of screws were implanted in accordance with grades 1 and 2. Deviation grade 2 was registered in 11 cases (32.35%). Mean deviation was 1.8 ± 1.0 mm. In the 2nd group, 28 (82.35%) out of 34 screws were completely within the bone structures (grade 0), 4 (11.76%) screws perforated pedicles for less than 50% of their diameter (grade 1). There were 2 cases of malposition grade 2 and 3 without vertebral artery injury.

Conclusion

Individual 3D navigation matrix is an effective method for screw installation into the axis. This approach exceeds fluoroscopy-assisted "free hand" technique in terms of safety of implantation.

The Subaxial Cervical Pedicle Screw for Cervical Spine Diseases: The Review of Technical Developments and Complication Avoidance

This study aimed to review information on the subaxial cervical pedicle screw (CPS) including recent anatomical considerations, entry points, placement techniques, accuracy, learning curve, and complications. Relevant literatures were reviewed, and the authors’ experiences were summarized. The CPS is used for reconstruction of unstable cervical spine and achieves superior biomechanical stability compared to other fixation techniques. Various insertion and guidance techniques are established, among which, lateral fluoroscopy-assisted placement is the most common and cost-effective technique. Generally, placement under imaging guidance is more accurate than other techniques, and a three-dimensional template allows optimal trajectory for each pedicle regardless of intraoperative changes in spinal alignment. The free-hand technique using a curved pedicle probe without a funnel-like hole increases screw stability and reduces operation time, radiation exposure, and soft tissue injury. Compared to conventional lateral fluoroscopy-assisted placement, free-hand CPS placement by trained surgeons achieves superior accuracy comparable to that of image-guided navigation; in general, 30 training cases are sufficient for learning a safe and accurate technique for CPS placement. The complications of subaxial CPS are classified into three categories: complications due to screw misplacement, complications without screw misplacement, and others. Inexperienced surgeons may benefit from advanced techniques; however, the accuracy of CPS ultimately depends on the surgeon’s experience. Inexperienced surgeons should master the placement of the thoracolumbar pedicle screw in real practice and practice CPS insertion using cadavers. During the initial phase of the learning curve, careful preparation of surgery, reiterated identification, patterned safety steps, and supervision of the expert are necessary.

Techniques of cervical pedicle screw insertion in lower cervical spine - A review

Cervical pedicle screws (CPS) have been used for stabilization of lower cervical spine since its first description by Abumi et al., in 1994^, but the usage has been limited due to the feared complications. Cadaveric studies have discouraged use of CPS in lower cervical spine due to high misplacement rates. On the contrary, clinical studies have shown limited complications due to screw misplacements and have highlighted the benefits of CPS with its superior biomechanical strength. Therefore surgeons have always tried to find a reliable, reproducible and safe CPS insertion technique to expand the usage of CPS with minimal complications. As of today Abumi et al. technique is the most popular free-hand technique used by surgeons, though many modifications have evolved to make the CPS insertions more safe and reproducible. The free hand technique should be considered as the cornerstone technique for CPS insertion and the navigation tools are essential to improve the safety of CPS in complex surgeries with altered cervical anatomy. The present review brings together the literature on the various aspects of cervical pedicle anatomy, the free-hand screw insertion techniques with their modifications, the screw misplacement rates and complications.

A new anatomical approach of cervical lateral mass for cervical pedicle screw and paravertebral foramen screw insertion

Thus far, anatomical studies have reported data on the cervical pedicle, with the focus remaining on the pedicle itself. It was necessary to obtain more comprehensive data about the relationships between the lateral mass, pedicle, and transverse foramen for cervical pedicle screwing (CPS) and paravertebral foramen screwing (PVFS), a new technique. The purpose of this study was to describe the relationships between the lateral mass, pedicle, and transverse foramen. This study analyzed computed tomography images from 77 patients (42 female, 35 male; mean age: 63.95 years). The anatomical pedicle transverse angle (PTA) and linear parameters of the lateral mass were measured, and the relationship between the calculated angles and the anatomical PTA was investigated. θp was defined as the convergence angle from the posterolateral edge of the lateral mass to the pedicle, and θc was defined as the convergence angle from the posterolateral edge of the lateral mass to the anterolateral corner of the vertebral foramen. The thickness of the cortical bone of the medial wall of the lateral mass (cT) and the medial (mT) and lateral (lT) walls of the pedicle at C3-7 were also measured. The PTA was similar to θp and θc at C3-6, but different at C7. In all cases, the transverse foramen was located more anterior to the posterior wall of the cervical body at C3-6, but not at C7. mT and cT were significantly thicker than lT at all levels. Lateral fluoroscopic images show that when the probe is inserted along θc, it meets the counter corner of the lateral mass at C3-6 without invasion of the transverse foramen if it does not cross the posterior wall of the vertebral body. This can be significant when performing CPS and PVFS.

Three Dimensional Measurement of Ideal Trajectory of Pedicle Screws of Subaxial Cervical Spine Using the Algorithm Could Be Applied for Robotic Screw Insertion

Objective

To define optimal method that calculate the safe direction of cervical pedicle screw placement using computed tomography (CT) image based three dimensional (3D) cortical shell model of human cervical spine.

Methods

Cortical shell model of cervical spine from C3 to C6 was made after segmentation of in vivo CT image data of 44 volunteers. Three dimensional Cartesian coordinate of all points constituting surface of whole vertebra, bilateral pedicle and posterior wall were acquired. The ideal trajectory of pedicle screw insertion was defined as viewing direction at which the inner area of pedicle become largest when we see through the biconcave tubular pedicle. The ideal trajectory of 352 pedicles (eight pedicles for each of 44 subjects) were calculated using custom made program and were changed from global coordinate to local coordinate according to the three dimensional position of posterior wall of each vertebral body. The transverse and sagittal angle of trajectory were defined as the angle between ideal trajectory line and perpendicular line of posterior wall in the horizontal and sagittal plane. The averages and standard deviations of all measurements were calculated.

Results

The average transverse angles were 50.60º±6.22º at C3, 51.42º ±7.44º at C4, 47.79º ±7.61º at C5, and 41.24º ±7.76º at C6. The transverse angle becomes more steep from C3 to C6. The mean sagittal angles were 9.72º ±6.73º downward at C3, 5.09º±6.39º downward at C4, 0.08º ±6.06º downward at C5, and 1.67º ±6.06º upward at C6. The sagittal angle changes from caudad to cephalad from C3 to C6.

Conclusion

The absolute values of transverse and sagittal angle in our study were not same but the trend of changes were similar to previous studies. Because we know 3D address of all points constituting cortical shell of cervical vertebrae. we can easily reconstruct 3D model and manage it freely using computer program. More creative measurement of morphological characteristics could be carried out than direct inspection of raw bone. Furthermore this concept of measurement could be used for the computing program of automated robotic screw insertion.

Application of patient-specific 3D navigation templates for pedicle screw fixation of subaxial and upper thoracic vertebrae

Objective. To analyze the safety and accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the subaxial cervical and upper thoracic spine using patient-specific 3D navigation templates.

Material and Methods. The study included 16 patients who underwent transpedicular implantation of screws in the subaxial cervical and upper thoracic vertebrae using patient-specific 3D navigation templates. A total of 88 screws were installed. All patients underwent preoperative CT angiography to assess visualization of the vertebral artery. Customized vertebral models and navigation templates were created using 3D printing technology. Models and templates were sterilized and used during surgery. The results of screw implantation, as well as the safety and accuracy of the placement, were assessed by postoperative CT.

Results. The average deviation from the planned trajectory was 1.8 ± 0.9 mm. Deviation was estimated as class 1 (<2 mm) for 57 (64.77 %) screws, class 2 (2–4 mm) for 29 (32.95 %), and class 3 for two (2.27 %). The safety of screw implantation of grade 0 (the screw is completely inside the bone structure) was in 79 (89.77 %) cases, of grade 1 (<50 % of the screw diameter perforates the bone) – in 5 (5.68 %), and of grade 3 – in 2 (2.27 %).

Conclusion. Using 3D navigation templates is an affordable and safe method of installing pedicle screws in the cervical and upper thoracic spine. The method can be used as an alternative to intraoperative CT navigation.

A Review of the Historical Evolution, Biomechanical Advantage, Clinical Applications, and Safe Insertion Techniques of Cervical Pedicle Screw Fixation

Cervical spine instrumentation is evolving with an aim of stabilizing traumatic and non-traumatic cases of the cervical spine with a beneficial reduction, better biomechanical strength, and a strong construct with minimal intraoperative, as well as immediate and late postoperative complications. The evolution from interspinous wiring till cervical pedicle screws has changed the outlook in treating the cervical spine pathologies with maximum 3D stability, decreasing the duration of postoperative immobilization and hospital stay. Some complications associated with the use of cervical pedicle screw can be catastrophic. This review article discusses the morphometry of cervical pedicle; indications, biomechanical superiority, tricks, and pitfalls of cervical pedicle screw; complications and technical advancements in targeting safe surgery; and future directions of cervical pedicle screw instrumentation.

Posterior Transpedicular Screw Fixation of Subaxial Vertebrae: Accuracy Rates and Safety of Mini-laminotomy Technique

Background and Aim:

Posterior cervical transpedicular screw fixation has the strongest resistance to pullout forces compared with other posterior fixation systems. Here, we present a case on the use of this technique combined with a mini-laminotomy technique, which serves as a guide for accurate insertion of posterior cervical transpedicular screws.

Materials and Methods:

We retrospectively analyzed data from 40 patients who underwent this procedure in our clinic between January 2014 and March 2017.

Results:

The study population comprised 27 males (67.5%) and 13 females (32.5%) aged 15–80 years (median, 51.5 years). Surgical indications included trauma (n = 18, 45%), degenerative disease (n = 19, 47.5%), spinal infection (n = 2, 5%), and basilar invagination due to systemic rheumatoid disease (n = 1, 2.5%). In the 18 trauma patients, 14 short-segment (1–2 levels) and 4 long-segment (≥3 levels) posterior cervical instrumentation and fusion procedures were performed. The mini-laminotomy technique was used in all patients to insert, direct, and achieve exact screw fixation in the pedicles. Pedicle perforations were classified as medial or lateral and were also graded. Among the 227 cervical pedicle fixations performed, 48 were at the C3 level, 49 at C4, 60 at C5, 50 at C6, and 20 at C7. Axial computed tomography scan measurements showed that 205 of 227 (90.3%, Grade 0 and 1) screws were accurately placed, whereas 22 (9.69%, Grade 2 and 3) were misplaced. However, no additional neurological injury due to misplacement was observed.

Conclusion:

As negligible complications were observed when performed by experienced surgeons, the mini-laminotomy technique can be safely used for posterior transpedicular screw fixation in the subaxial vertebrae for single-staged fusion.

Intraoperative Computed Tomography Versus 3D C-Arm Imaging for Navigated Spinal Instrumentation

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective case-series study and a retrospective analysis of historical patients for comparison of data.

OBJECTIVE

To compare accuracy and limitations of intraoperative computed tomography (iCT)- versus 3D C-arm-based spinal navigation for posterior pedicle screw implantation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Despite the higher accuracy of navigated compared to non-navigated pedicle screw implantation, it remains a matter of debate whether the use of iCT imaging may further benefit navigated spinal instrumentation compared to more commonly used isocentric 3D C-arm imaging.

METHODS

Between 2013 and 2016, 1527 pedicle screws were implanted in 260 patients with iCT (1219 screws) or 3D C-arm (308 screws)-based spinal navigation. Screw positioning was intraoperatively assessed by a second iCT or 3D C-arm (intraoperative accuracy). If necessary, immediate intraoperative screw revision was performed. Thereafter, a third iCT or 3D C-arm scan was performed to confirm repositioning (final accuracy). Clinical and patient data, intraoperative screw assessability, and accuracy rates were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed by an independent observer.

RESULTS

Intraoperative CT permitted immediate intraoperative assessment of each implanted screw. In contrast, 39 of the screws visualized with 3D C-arm imaging were intraoperatively not clearly assessable. Regarding the overall precision, iCT and 3D C-arm navigation yielded a comparable intraoperative accuracy (iCT 94.7% vs 3D C-arm 89.4%) and immediate correction of misplaced screws was feasible with both modalities (final accuracy: iCT 95.4% vs 3D C-arm 91.6%). Regarding the region specific performance, however, iCT-based navigation yielded significantly higher final accuracy rates in the cervical (iCT 99.5% vs 3D C-arm 88.9%, P < 0.01) and thoracic (iCT 97.7% vs 3D C-arm 88.8%, P < 0.001) regions.

CONCLUSION

Both iCT and 3D C-arm-based spinal navigation provides high pedicle screw accuracy rates. Immediate screw assessability and placement accuracy in the cervical-thoracic spine, however, appear to be limited with intraoperative 3D C-arm imaging alone.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Characteristics of regional bone quality in cervical vertebrae considering BMD: Determining a safe trajectory for cervical pedicle screw fixation

This study aimed to report the mechanical strength and characteristics of the lateral mass and pedicle considering BMD for the safe insertion of pedicle screws in the subaxial cervical level. We evaluated BMD and Hounsfield unit (HU) values of cortical bones at the lateral mass and pedicle of C3-7 from CT images in 99 patients. Patients were divided into three groups (Group A, T-score ≥ -1; Group B, -2.5 < T-score < -1.0; Group C, T-score ≤ -2.5). The HU numbers of cortical bone in the vertebral canal (medial wall of the lateral mass; cHU), posterior wall of the transverse foramen (fHU), and medial wall, lateral wall, and trabecular area of the pedicle (mHU, lHU, and pHU, respectively) were measured on the CT images in the middle of the pedicle. A mechanical study was also performed to measure cortical bone strength using 10 fresh cadavers. The cHU and mHU values in Group C were higher than lHU and fHU in Groups A and B, and there was a wide gap between the pHU value and other areas. The penetrating force also had a close correlation with HU number. The mean penetrating force of the medial wall of the lateral mass and the posterior wall of the transverse foramen were 210.08 ± 110.46 and 50.51 ± 46.09 N, respectively. The cortical bones in the vertebral canal and medial wall of the pedicle were stronger than the lateral wall and the trabecular area. The cHU and mHU in the osteoporotic group were higher than fHU and pHU in the normal group. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:217-223, 2018.

Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement Using Medial Funnel Technique

OBJECTIVE

Cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement is very challenging due to high risk of neurovascular complications. We devised a new technique (medial funnel technique) to improve the accuracy and feasibility of CPS placement.

METHODS

We reviewed 28 consecutive patients undergoing CPS instrumentation using the medial funnel technique. Their mean age was 51.4 years (range, 30-81 years). Preoperative diagnosis included degenerative disease (n=5), trauma (n=22), and infection (n=1). Screw perforations were graded with the following criteria: grade 0 having no perforation, grade 1 having <25%, grade 2 having 25%-50% and grade 3 having >50% of screw diameter. Grades 0 and 1 were considered as correct position. The degree of perforation was determined by 2 junior neurosurgeons and 1 senior neurosurgeon.

RESULTS

A total of 88 CPSs were inserted. The rate of correct placement was 94.3%; grade 0, 54 screws; grade 1, 29 screws; grade 2, 4 screws; and grade 3, 1 screw. No neurovascular complications or failure of instrumentation occurred. In perforated screws (34 screws), lateral perforations were 4 and medial perforations were 30.

CONCLUSION

We performed CPS insertion using medial funnel technique and achieved 94.3% (83 of 88) of correct placement. And it can decrease lateral perforation.

In vitro study of accuracy of subaxial cervical pedicle screw insertion using calipers based on the gravity line

Object

There is a high probability of iatrogenic perforation of the vertebral pedicle wall during the application of subaxial cervical pedicle screw (CPS). The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of CPS insertion at C3-C7 in vitro using novel calipers based on the gravity line.

Methods

Nine cadaveric cervical spines underwent computed tomography scanning and preoperative design. A lateral fluoroscopic view was taken to measure the intra-operative sagittal angle by C-arm with hanging cross structured K-wires. By referring to the gravity line, caliper A was used to locate the entry point, while caliper B was employed to guide the screw insertion. Postoperative CT scans were performed to assess the accuracy of the screw placements, according to the Neo classification.

Results

Overall, 78 (88.6%) of the 88 pedicle screw placements were classified as grade 0 (correct position), 4 (4.5%) were grade 1 (non-critical perforation), 4 (4.5%) were grade 2 (critical perforation), and 2 (2.3%) were grade 3 (critical perforation).

Conclusions

Using our novel calipers and referring to the gravity line was helpful for locating and guiding individual cervical pedicle screw insertions.

Monitoring reduced scattering coefficient in pedicle screw insertion trajectory using near-infrared spectroscopy

Pedicle screw (PS) implantation is an ideal treatment for severe multilevel vertebra instabilities. The accuracy of fixating PS is a key factor of spinal surgery. We developed a near-infrared spectroscopy device with a needlelike optical fiber probe to monitor optical parameters (reduced scattering coefficient) of vertebra models in real time. The fresh-frozen cadaver, cats and porcine vertebras were first studied in the experiments. Moreover, the reduced scattering coefficient (μ' s) along the different trajectories of PS insertion was obtained. In the fresh-frozen cadavera experiment, μ' s values could be used to distinguish the different compositions of the thoracic vertebra. In cat vertebra experiment, μ' s values of vertebrae bones, including cortical bone (15.30 ± 0.18 cm(-1)), cancellous bone (7.84 ± 1.11 cm(-1)) and spinal cord (19.46 ± 0.21 cm(-1)), were different in vivo. In the pig vertebrae experiment, there were obvious differences between the normal and abnormal PS puncture curves based on μ' s values. Thus, μ' s values measured by using the proposed device could be used as the pattern factor in spinal fusion surgery. Our studies demonstrate that near-infrared spectroscopy method may be potentially used for assisting the PS insertion.

Hybrid Technique for Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement: Combination of Miniopen Surgery and Use of a Percutaneous Cannula System-Pilot Study

STUDY DESIGN

Cadaver study and clinical application; a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE

To minimize muscle dissection and enhance accuracy of cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement by using a percutaneous cannula system.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Many studies have reported that the most frequent misplacement of CPSs is breach of the lateral wall; thus, an easy technique for securing medial convergence is required. We developed a percutaneous cannula system for this purpose and report the results of a cadaver study and its clinical application.

METHODS

A cadaver study was conducted to confirm the possibility of this percutaneous technique in 5 specimens (50 CPSs, C3-C7). Then, the technique was applied in 8 patients (40 CPSs, C3-C7). The surgical technique was a hybrid of miniopen surgery and the use of percutaneous cannula system under lateral fluoroscopic guidance. Entry holes were made in the open field and a cannula was used for tapping and insertion of CPSs. A stiff pedicle probe through the cannula was used to locate the pedicle in the lateral mass.

RESULTS

In the cadaver study, there were 12 (24%) misplacements among 50 CPSs used. The hybrid technique was applied clinically in 4 traumatic, 2 degenerative, and 2 failed back surgery lesions. Thirty CPSs were inserted using the percutaneous cannula system and 10 were inserted using a cannula as a retractor. Misplacement occurred in 6.7% (n = 2) and 20% (n = 2) pedicles, respectively, and there were no symptomatic complications (total incidence, 10%). An additional incision for the cannula system can be made for 2-level CPS insertions.

CONCLUSION

Use of the percutaneous cannula system facilitated a secure convergence angle for CPS insertion without extending muscle dissection or shifting cervical alignment because of muscle retraction. Moreover, this system can be used for CPS insertion in bull-necked patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: posterior decompression and pedicle screw fixation

INTRODUCTION

Posterior decompression by laminoplasty and anterior decompression/fixation have been widely accepted, and they provide sufficient results for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. However, combined procedure of posterior decompression and reconstruction is favorable for some patients accompanying local kyphosis, segmental instability, previously operated conditions on the cervical spine, etc.

DISCUSSION

Among posterior cervical instrumentations, pedicle screw fixation is a strong tool of stabilization of unstable segment and correction of deformities in sagittal and/or coronal planes for the patient with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. On the other hand, neurovascular complications including injury to the vertebral artery and nerve root cannot be completely eliminated. Even after surgeons became familiar with placement of cervical pedicle screws, screw malposition rate by freehand technique is high for patients with severe spondylotic condition. Surgeons must especially be careful for inserting pedicle screw in the cervical spine associating marked degenerative changes by spondylosis, and must obtain preoperatively sufficient anatomical information of the pedicle and surrounding structures.

CONCLUSION

Combined procedure of posterior reconstructive surgery using a pedicle screw fixation provides better clinical outcomes than laminoplasty alone for cervical spondylotic myelopathy accompanying local kyphosis or segmental instability. Further development of supporting tools for cervical pedicle screw insertion including aiming device, navigation system and neuromonitoring procedure are expected for safer screw insertion.