New-Generation Quantitative Immunoassays for SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Detection: Need for Harmonization

Humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in people living with HIV

PURPOSE

To describe the humoral immune response to COVID-19 vaccines in people living with HIV and identify factors associated with the magnitude of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody concentrations.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of electronic patient files in a big single HIV center in Munich, Germany. Non-parametric methods were used for descriptive and comparative statistics. Generalized linear models were used to analyze associations of general and HIV-specific variables with anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody concentrations after standard vaccination.

RESULT

Overall, 665 people living with HIV were included into the analysis (median age: 53 [IQR: 43; 59]), 560 [84.2%] males). Median concentration of anti-SARS-CoV-2-antibodies was 1400 (IQR 664; 2130) BAU/mL. In 18 (2.7%) subjects, antibody concentrations below the threshold of 34 BAU/mL were found. Among PLWH with CD4 cell count < 200 cells/µL, median anti-SARS-CoV-2-Abs were 197 (IQR 44.6; 537.2) as compared to 1420 (IQR 687; 2216) for the group ≥ 200 cells/µL (p < 0.001). In a cumulative logit model, a vaccination scheme including an mRNA vaccine [OR: 4.64 (3.58; 6.02)], being female [OR: 2.14 (1.76; 2.61)], and having higher CD4 cells [OR per 100 cells/µL: 1.06 (1.04; 1.08)] were significantly associated with anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody concentrations in higher quartiles, when adjusted for the time after vaccination.

CONCLUSION

We found a robust antibody response in people living with HIV undergoing standard vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. mRNA-containing vaccination schemes, being female, and having a higher CD4 cell count was associated with a higher concentration of antibodies in people living with HIV in our study sample. Particularly in the subgroup with CD4 cell counts < 200 cells/µL, antibody response was poor.

The role of neutralizing antibodies by sVNT after two doses of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in a cohort of Italian healthcare workers

OBJECTIVES

Evaluating anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels is a current priority to drive immunization, as well as to predict when a vaccine booster dose may be required and for which priority groups. The aim of our study was to investigate the kinetics of anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike S1 protein IgG (anti-S1 IgG) antibodies and neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) in an Italian cohort of healthcare workers (HCWs), following the Pfizer/BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine, over a period of up to six months after the second dose.

METHODS

We enrolled 57 HCWs, without clinical history of COVID-19 infection. Fluoroenzyme-immunoassay was used for the quantitative anti-S1 IgG antibodies at different time points T1 (one month), T3 (three months) and T6 (six months) following the second vaccine shot. Simultaneously, a commercial surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT) was used for the determination of NAbs, expressed as inhibition percentage (% IH).

RESULTS

Median values of anti-S1 IgG antibodies decreased from T1 (1,452 BAU/mL) to T6 (104 BAU/mL) with a percent variation of 92.8% while the sVNT showed a percent variation of 34.3% for the same time frame. The decline in anti-S1 IgG antibodies from T1 to T6 was not accompanied by a loss of the neutralizing capacity of antibodies. In fact at T6 a neutralization percentage <20% IH was observed only in 3.51% of HCWs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings reveal that the decrease of anti-S1 IgG levels do not correspond in parallel to a decrease of NAbs over time, which highlights the necessity of using both assays to assess vaccination effectiveness.

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay: An Adaptable Methodology to Study SARS-CoV-2 Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses

The Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay is a versatile technique, which can be used for several applications. It has enormously contributed to the study of infectious diseases. This review highlights how this methodology supported the science conducted in COVID-19 pandemics, allowing scientists to better understand the immune response against SARS-CoV-2. ELISA can be modified to assess the functionality of antibodies, as avidity and neutralization, respectively by the standardization of avidity-ELISA and surrogate-neutralization methods. Cellular immunity can also be studied using this assay. Products secreted by cells, like proteins and cytokines, can be studied by ELISA or its derivative Enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) assay. ELISA and ELISA-based methods aided the area of immunology against infectious diseases and is still relevant, for example, as a promising approach to study the differences between natural and vaccine-induced immune responses against SARS-CoV-2.