Current consensus and guidelines of contrast enhanced ultrasound for the characterization of focal liver lesions

Ultrasomics in liver cancer: Developing a radiomics model for differentiating intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma using contrast-enhanced ultrasound

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) represent the predominant histological types of primary liver cancer, comprising over 99% of cases. Given their differing biological behaviors, prognoses, and treatment strategies, accurately differentiating between HCC and ICC is crucial for effective clinical management. Radiomics, an emerging image processing technology, can automatically extract various quantitative image features that may elude the human eye. Reports on the application of ultrasound (US)-based radiomics methods in distinguishing HCC from ICC are limited.

AIM

To develop and validate an ultrasomics model to accurately differentiate between HCC and ICC.

METHODS

In our retrospective study, we included a total of 280 patients who were diagnosed with ICC (n = 140) and HCC (n = 140) between 1999 and 2019. These patients were divided into training (n = 224) and testing (n = 56) groups for analysis. US images and relevant clinical characteristics were collected. We utilized the XGBoost method to extract and select radiomics features and further employed a random forest algorithm to establish ultrasomics models. We compared the diagnostic performances of these ultrasomics models with that of radiologists.

RESULTS

Four distinct ultrasomics models were constructed, with the number of selected features varying between models: 13 features for the US model; 15 for the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) model; 13 for the combined US + CEUS model; and 21 for the US + CEUS + clinical data model. The US + CEUS + clinical data model yielded the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) among all models, achieving an AUC of 0.973 in the validation cohort and 0.971 in the test cohort. This performance exceeded even the most experienced radiologist (AUC = 0.964). The AUC for the US + CEUS model (training cohort AUC = 0.964, test cohort AUC = 0.955) was significantly higher than that of the US model alone (training cohort AUC = 0.822, test cohort AUC = 0.816). This finding underscored the significant benefit of incorporating CEUS information in accurately distinguishing ICC from HCC.

CONCLUSION

We developed a radiomics diagnostic model based on CEUS images capable of quickly distinguishing HCC from ICC, which outperformed experienced radiologists.

Principle of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography

Sonazoid, an ultrasound contrast agent, has been covered by insurance in Japan since January 2007 for the diagnosis of hepatic mass lesions and is widely used for diagnosing not only primary liver cancer but also liver metastases such as those from breast cancer and colorectal cancer. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for breast mass lesions has been covered by insurance since August 2012 after phase II and phase III clinical trials showed that the diagnostic performance was significantly superior to that of B-mode and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. This paper describes the principles of imaging techniques in contrast-enhanced ultrasonography including the filter, pulse inversion, amplitude modulation, and amplitude-modulated pulse inversion methods. The pulse inversion method, which visualizes the second-harmonic component using the nonlinear scattering characteristics of the contrast agent, is widely used regardless of the contrast agent and target organ because of its high resolution. Sonazoid has a stiffer shell and requires a higher acoustic amplitude than Sonovue to generate nonlinear vibrations. The higher transmitted sound pressure generates more tissue harmonic components. Since pulse inversion allows visualization of the tissue harmonic components, amplitude modulation and amplitude-modulated pulse inversion, which include few tissue harmonic components, are primarily used. Amplitude modulation methods detect nonlinear signals from the contrast agent in the fundamental band. The mechanism of the amplitude modulation is considered to be changes in the echo signal's phase depending on the sound pressure. Since the tissue-derived component is minor in amplitude modulation methods, good contrast sensitivity can be obtained.

Addition of contrast in ultrasound screening for hepatocellular carcinoma

Objective

Screening ultrasound for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) identifies lesions which require further characterization by a contrast-enhanced exam to non-invasively diagnose HCC. While ultrasound is recommended in screening, some HCC can be occult on grayscale imaging. The purpose of this study was to determine if the addition of ultrasound contrast (sulfahexafluoride) to screening ultrasound for HCC can identify more HCC lesions than grayscale sonographic imaging alone.

Methods

All HCC screening ultrasounds that also had contrast were evaluated in this retrospective study. Patients with a focal lesion seen only after administration of contrast (OAC) were noted, as well as any follow-up imaging or pathology results. Additional variables collected included patient demographics, cirrhosis type, and laboratory values.

Results

230 unique patients were included, of which 160 had imaging or pathology follow-up. 18 of these patients had an OAC lesion, of which 17 had follow-up. Among these OACs, there was one LIRADS M lesion (1/18, 5.6 %) and one bland portal vein thrombus identified, which were both confirmed on follow-up imaging. All LIRADS 4 OAC lesions were downgraded. No additional HCC were identified on follow-up imaging or pathology of these patients.

Conclusion

Addition of contrast to screening ultrasound did identify additional lesions, portal vein thrombus, and high grade malignancy. However, as the incidence of OAC lesions was low (7.8 %, 18/230) and most of the lesions were not malignant, addition of post contrast sweeps through the liver is of low value in the low to medium at-risk cirrhotic population in identifying occult HCC.

Development and Validation of a Nomogram to Predict the Recurrence of HCC Patients Undergoing CECT After Ablation

Purpose

We first aimed to compare the prognostic difference between the application of Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and Non-enhanced computed tomography (NECT) in hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) patients with early-stage immediately after ablation. We secondly propose to explore the risk factors for recurrence in patients undergoing CECT, and then develop a nomogram.

Patients and Methods

Clinical data were collected from 711 patients who received TACE combined with ablation from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2022, at Beijing Youan Hospital. According to the imaging methods applied after ablation, patients were categorized into the CECT group and the NECT group and then were compared by Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves. Lasso regression is used to screen risk factors for recurrence and the nomogram was plotted. Finally, discrimination, calibration plot, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to measure the performance of the nomogram.

Results

The KM curve indicates that recurrence-free survival (RFS) was longer in the CECT group than in the NECT group (HR =0.759, 95% CI 0.606-0.951, P=0.016). Six variables were selected to construct the nomogram. 1-, 3-, and 5-year area under the curves (AUCs) (0.867, 0.731, 0.773 and 0.896, 0.784, 0.773) of the training and validation cohorts proved the good predictive performance of the nomogram. Calibration curves and DCA curves suggested accuracy and net clinical benefit rates. The nomogram enabled to classify of patients into three groups according to the risk of recurrence: low risk, intermediate risk, and high risk. There was a statistically significant difference in RFS between the two groups in the training and validation cohorts (P<0.001).

Conclusion

We demonstrated that HCC patients who underwent CECT evaluation after ablation had a better prognosis, making this evaluation method highly recommended for guiding clinical management.

The added value of color parameter imaging for the evaluation of focal liver lesions with "homogenous hyperenhancement and no wash out" on contrast enhanced ultrasound

Objective

The purpose of this study was to investigate the added value of color parameter imaging (CPI) in the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions (FLLs) with "homogeneous hyperenhancement but not wash out" on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

Methods

A total of 101 patients with 108 FLLs were enrolled in this study. All the FLLs received US and CEUS examinations. The stored CEUS clips of target lesions were postprocessed with CPI analysis by radiologists. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the added value of CPI. The McNamara test was used to compare the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy between CEUS and CPI patterns. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to develop a CPI nomogram. The C index and calibration curve were used to evaluate the predictive ability of the nomogram. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to test the reproducibility and reliability of CPI. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the added value of applying CPI.

Results

The following CPI features were more frequently observed in malignant FLLs: eccentric perfusion (malignant: 70.0% vs. benign: 29.2%, p < 0.001), feeding artery (51.7% vs. 4.2%, p < 0.001), mosaic (63.3% vs. 6.3%, p < 0.001), red ingredients >1/3 (90.0% vs. 14.6%, p < 0.001). In addition, centripetal (43.8% vs. 18.3%, p = 0.004), peripheral nodular (54.2% vs. 1.7%, p < 0.001), subcapsular vessel (12.5% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.004), spoke-wheel vessels (25.0% vs. 5.0%, p = 0.003), branched vessels (22.9% vs. 5.0%, p = 0.006), blue and pink ingredients >2/3 (85.4% vs. 10.0%, p < 0.001) were more observed in benign FLLs. A nomogram incorporating peripheral nodular, spoke-wheel vessels, and red ingredients >1/3 was constructed. The model had satisfactory discrimination (AUC = 0.937), and the optimal diagnostic threshold value was 0.740 (0.983, 0.850). By the DCA, the model offered a net benefit over the treat-all-patients scheme or the treat-none scheme at a threshold probability 5%-93%.

Conclusion

Using CPI can detect and render subtle information of the main features of FLLs on CEUS; it is conducive to the radiologist for imaging interpretation, and a combining read of the CEUS and CPI of the FLLs with features of "homogenous hyperenhancement and no washout" can improve significantly the diagnostic performance of CEUS for FLLs.

Establishment and Validation of the LI-RADS Morphologic Type II Hepatocellular Carcinoma Early Recurrence Risk Scoring System

BACKGROUND

Tumor morphology links to early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Controversy exists regarding the recurrence risk of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System morphologic Type II hepatocellular carcinoma. This study aims to explore risk factors for early recurrence of Type II hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients who underwent curative resection and preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI from June 2016 to June 2020. Our patients formed the development set, and hepatocellular carcinoma patients from the TCIA database served as validation. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression identified independent risk factors for early recurrence. A risk scoring system was established for risk stratification, and an early recurrence prediction model was developed and validated.

RESULTS

95 Type II hepatocellular carcinoma patients were in the development set, and 29 cases were in the validation set. Early recurrence rates were 33.7% and 37.9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed age, histological grade, AFP, and intratumoral hemorrhage as independent risk factors for early recurrence. The model's diagnostic performance for early recurrence was AUC = 0.817 in the development set. A scoring system classified patients into low-risk (scores ≤ 3) and high-risk (scores > 3) groups. The high-risk group had significantly lower recurrence-free survival (40.0% vs 73.2%, P = 0.001), consistent with the validation set (25.0% vs 73.3%, P = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk scoring system demonstrated excellent discrimination and predictive ability, aiding clinicians in assessing early recurrence risk and identifying high-risk individuals effectively.

Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosing hepatic artery occlusion after liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Hepatic artery occlusion (HAO) is a significant complication post-liver transplantation. Doppler ultrasound (DUS) has been widely used as an initial screening test for detecting HAO; however, its performance is often not sufficient. Although other diagnostic tests such as computed tomography angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), and angiogram are more accurate, they are invasive and have several limitations. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is an emerging tool for detecting HAO; however, the results from previous studies were limited due to a small number of patients. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate its performance by performing a meta-analysis.

METHOD

We performed a systemic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating the performance of CEUS for the detection of HAO in an adult population. A literature search of EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, and Medline was conducted through March 2022. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, log diagnostic odd ratio (LDOR), and area under summary receiver operating curve (AUC) were calculated. Publication bias was assessed by Deeks' funnel plot.

RESULT

Eight studies were included, with 434 CEUS performed. Using a combination of CTA, MRA, angiography, clinical follow-up, and surgery as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, and LDOR of CEUS for detection of HAO were .969 (.938, .996), .991 (.981, 1.001), and 5.732 (4.539, 6.926), respectively. AUC was .959. The heterogeneity between studies appeared universally low, and no significant publication bias was found (p = .44).

CONCLUSION

CEUS appeared to have an excellent performance for the detection of HAO and could be considered as an alternative when DUS is non-diagnostic or when CTA, MRA, and angiogram are not feasible.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound with Optimized Aperture Patterns and Bubble Segmentation Based on Echo Phase

Amplitude modulation (AM) suppresses tissue signals and detects microbubble signals in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and is often implemented with checkerboard apertures. However, possible crosstalk between transmitting and non-transmitting array elements may compromise tissue suppression in AM. Using AM aperture patterns other than the conventional checkerboard approach (one on, one off) may reduce the degree of crosstalk and increase the contrast-to-tissue-ratio (CTR) compared with conventional AM. Furthermore, previous studies have reported that the phase difference between the echoes in AM pulsing sequences may be used to segment tissue and microbubbles and improve tissue signal suppression and the CTR of CEUS images. However, the CTR of the image produced by alternative AM aperture patterns and the effect of segmentation approach on these alternative apertures have not been investigated. We evaluated a number of AM aperture patterns to find an optimal AM aperture pattern that provides the highest CTR. We found that the aperture that uses alternating groups of two elements, AM2, had the highest CTR for the probe evaluated. In addition, a segmentation technique based on echo phase differences (between the full and half-pulses, ΔΦAM, between the complementary half-pulses, ΔΦhalf, and the maximum of the two ΔΦmax) was also considered in the AM aperture optimization process. The segmentation approach increases the CTR by about 25 dB for all apertures. Finally, AM2 segmented with ΔΦmax had a 7-dB higher CTR in a flow phantom and a 6-dB higher contrast in a perfused pig liver than conventional AM segmented with ΔΦAM, and it is the optimal transmit aperture design.

Streptococcus pyogenes infection of a mediastinal cyst after endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration

Mediastinal masses are uncommon and difficult to diagnose. Endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a minimally invasive technique for diagnosis of mediastinal lesions with few complications. Our report described a mediastinal bronchogenic cyst with soft tissue density infected by Streptococcus pyogenes (S. pyogenes) after EUS-FNA, accompanied by respiratory cardiac arrest and superior vena cava syndrome. The patient underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation to gain the chance for emergency surgery and recovered. Clinicians should be aware that mediastinal mass with soft tissue density shown on imaging may be mediastinal cyst containing high density mucin, FNA should be avoided if cystic masses cannot be ruled out.

Computer-Aided Color Parameter Imaging of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Evaluates Hepatocellular Carcinoma Hemodynamic Features and Predicts Radiofrequency Ablation Outcome

Computer-aided color parameter imaging (CPI) is a novel technique for contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) that can highlight hemodynamic features of focal lesions. The purpose of the study was to investigate the role of CPI in evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) hemodynamic features and prognosis after radiofrequency ablation (RFA). One hundred twenty-one patients with HCC underwent CEUS with CPI analysis before RFA. Eighty-nine patients had pathologically proven well- to moderately differentiated HCC (WM-HCC), and 32 patients had poorly differentiated or undifferentiated HCC (PU-HCC). Perfusion features of CEUS and contrast-enhanced computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging were compared with CPI parameters for WM-HCC and PU-HCC. The results indicated that 67.4% of WM-HCC had a centrifugal perfusion CPI pattern, whereas 84.4% of PU-HCC tumors had a centripetal pattern (p < 0.001, odds ratio = 11.2). The specificity, sensitivity and accuracy of the CPI perfusion pattern regarding HCC pathological grade were higher than those with routine CEUS (84.4% vs. 9.4%, p < 0.001; 67.4% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.001; 71.9% vs. 5.0%, p < 0.001). Moreover, multivariable analysis revealed that the CPI perfusion pattern was an independent risk factor for progression-free survival post-RFA (centripetal group: 28.3 ± 4.1 mo vs. centrifugal group: 45.8 ± 4.4 mo, p = 0.002). A novel CPI technique for CEUS could non-invasively provide valuable hemodynamic information and predict prognosis for HCC patients treated by RFA.

Diagnostic accuracy of hepatic vein arrival time performed with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for HCV liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) has increased considerably the use of ultrasound for hemodynamical analyses and quantification. Bolus injection of microbubble agents is used to evaluate transit times. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of arrival time (seconds) to the hepatic artery (HAAT), hepatic vein (HVAT), and portal vein (PVAT), based on CEUS used for the diagnosis of cirrhosis, and to correlate these arrival times with the liver stiffness and disease severity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study evaluated 29 HCV cirrhotic and 19 chronic hepatitis C patients. History, clinical examination, laboratory investigations, abdominal ultrasonography, point shear-wave elastography (pSWE), and CEUS were conducted.

RESULTS

The mean liver stiffness increased significantly in cirrhotic versus chronic HCV (22.7 versus 5.1; p-value < 0.001). The mean HAAT (p-value = 0.001), PVAT (p-value = 0.002), and HVAT values (p-value: 0.001) were significantly prolonged in cirrhotic compared with chronic HCV. The HVAT cut-off point of cirrhotic patients was 18 s with a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 96.6%, 63.2%, and 83.3%, respectively (area under curve: 0.801). Significant positive correlation was found between liver stiffness (kPa) and HVAT (s) (r = 0.585; p-value = 0.005). No significant correlation was detected between HVAT (s) and the severity of liver disease, as assessed by the Child or MELD scores in cirrhotic patients.

CONCLUSION

Measuring HVAT by CEUS yielded high-accuracy and correlation outcomes for cirrhosis detection. It could be a valuable noninvasive method for the diagnosis of cirrhosis.

Investigation of the Phase of Nonlinear Echoes From Microbubbles During Amplitude Modulation

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging relies on distinguishing between microbubble and tissue echoes. Amplitude modulation (AM), a nonlinear pulsing scheme, has been developed to take advantage of the amplitude-dependent nonlinearity of microbubble echoes. However, with AM, tissue nonlinear propagation can also degrade the image contrast. Segmentation of CEUS images based on amplitude-dependent phase difference in the echoes, defined in this article as [Formula: see text], has been proposed as an additional method of enhancing contrast-to-tissue ratio as tissue is not expected to create the same degree of [Formula: see text]; however, this has not been robustly investigated. In this work, we evaluate the source of [Formula: see text] through simulations of unshelled versus shelled microbubble oscillation and simulations of nonlinear propagation in tissue. We then validate the simulated [Formula: see text] results with experimental [Formula: see text] measurements during in vitro scattering and imaging in a flow phantom. We show that shelled and unshelled microbubbles resulted in a [Formula: see text] with similar overall magnitude with some differences in trends, and that tissue echoes have a small yet detectable degree of [Formula: see text] due to nonlinear propagation. The results from this work can help inform optimal parameter selection for phase segmentation and implementation on a clinical scanner.

High Frame Rate Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Helps Differentiate Malignant and Benign Focal Liver Lesions

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of high frame rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound (H-CEUS) of focal liver lesions (FLLs).

METHODS

From July 2017 to June 2019, conventional contrast-enhanced ultrasound (C-CEUS) and H-CEUS were performed in 78 patients with 78 nodules. The characteristics of C-CEUS and H-CEUS in malignant and benign groups and the differences between different lesion sizes (1-3 cm, 3-5 cm, or >5 cm) of C-CEUS and H-CEUS were examined. The diagnostic performance of C-CEUS and H-CEUS was analyzed. The chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used to assess inter-group differences. The receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted to determine the diagnostic performance of C-CEUS and H-CEUS.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in the enhancement area, fill-in direction and vascular architecture between C-CEUS and H-CEUS for both benign and malignant lesions (all p=0.000-0.008), but there were no significant differences in washout results (p=0.566 and p=0.684, respectively). For lesions 1-3 cm in size, the enhancement area, fill-in direction, and vascular architecture on C-CEUS and H-CEUS were significantly different (all p=0.000), unlike for lesions 3-5 cm or >5 cm in size. For differentiation of malignant from benign FLLs in the 1-3 cm group, H-CEUS showed sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of 92.86%, 95.0%, 96.3%, 90.48% and 93.75%, respectively, which were higher than those for C-CEUS (75.0%, 70.0%, 77.78%, 66.67% and 72.91%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

H-CEUS provided more vascular information which could help differentiate malignant from benign FLLs, especially for lesions 1-3 cm in size.

Cavitation Therapy Monitoring of Commercial Microbubbles With a Clinical Scanner

The ability to monitor cavitation activity during ultrasound and microbubble-mediated procedures is of high clinical value. However, there has been little reported literature comparing the cavitation characteristics of different clinical microbubbles, nor have current clinical scanners been used to perform passive cavitation detection in real time. The goal of this work was to investigate and characterize standard microbubble formulations (Optison, Sonovue, Sonazoid, and a custom microbubble made with similar components as Definity) with a custom passive cavitation detector (two confocal single-element focused transducers) and with a Philips EPIQ scanner with a C5-1 curvilinear probe passively listening. We evaluated three different methods for investigating cavitation thresholds, two from previously reported work and one developed in this work. For all three techniques, it was observed that the inertial cavitation thresholds were between 0.1 and 0.3 MPa for all agents when detected with both systems. Notably, we found that most microbubble formulations in bulk solution behaved generally similarly, with some differences. We show that these characteristics and thresholds are maintained when using a diagnostic ultrasound system for detecting cavitation activity. We believe that a systematic evaluation of the frequency response of the cavitation activity of different microbubbles in order to inform real-time therapy monitoring using a clinical ultrasound device could make an immediate clinical impact.

Accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

After the introduction of the contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS), several studies have reported on its performance, but the reported data vary considerably. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic performance of CEUS LI-RADS in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and investigate the causes of study heterogeneity.

METHODS

Original studies published until May 30, 2020, investigating the diagnostic performance of CEUS LI-RADS were identified in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases. Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Meta-analytic summary sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of HCC were calculated using a bivariate random-effects model. Meta-regression analysis was performed to explore the causes of study heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Of the 105 articles screened, eight studies were finally analyzed (5428 hepatic observations). The summary sensitivity and specificity of CEUS LI-RADS category 5 (LR-5) for diagnosing HCC were 73% [95% confidence interval (CI) 65-79%; I² = 93%] and 95% (95% CI 91-97%; I² = 89%), respectively. Substantial study heterogeneity was noted in both sensitivity and specificity. Study heterogeneity was significantly associated with the proportion of cases of HCC and the type of reference standard (p ≤ 0.05).

CONCLUSION

CEUS LI-RADS had high pooled specificity for diagnosing HCC but suboptimal pooled sensitivity. Substantial study heterogeneity was found, which was significantly associated with the proportion of cases of HCC and the type of reference standard.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography for Screening and Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Case Series and Review of the Literature

Background: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a safe and noninvasive imaging technique that can characterize and evaluate liver lesions, and has been approved for this use in the Unites States since 2016. CEUS has been shown to be similar in accuracy to computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and offers several advantages in certain patient populations who have contraindications for CT or MRI. However, CEUS has inherent limitations and has not been widely employed for evaluation of HCC. Methods: We present three retrospective cases of liver lesions in patients with cirrhosis, who underwent screening for HCC using concurrent, well-timed CT and CEUS. Results: In these cases, the liver lesions were better visualized and then diagnosed as malignancy via CEUS, whereas the lesions were best appreciated on CT only in retrospect. Conclusions: In some cirrhotic patients, a focal lesion may be more easily identifiable via CEUS than on CT and thus accurately characterized, suggesting an important and complementary role of CEUS with CT or MRI. Further studies are indicated to support the use of CEUS for the diagnosis and characterization of liver lesions in screening patients at risk for developing HCC.

Intraoperative Imaging Techniques to Visualize Hepatic (Micro)Perfusion: An Overview

The microcirculation plays a crucial role in the distribution of perfusion to organs. Studies have shown that microcirculatory dysfunction is an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality. Hence, assessment of liver perfusion offers valuable information on the (patho)physiological state of the liver. The current review explores techniques in perfusion imaging that can be used intraoperatively. Available modalities include dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound, handheld vital microscopes, indocyanine green fluorescence angiography, and laser contrast speckle imaging. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound relays information on deep tissue perfusion and is a commonly used technique to assess tumor perfusion. Handheld vital microscopes provide direct visualization of the sinusoidal architectural structure of the liver, which is a unique feature of this technique. Intraoperative fluorescence imaging uses indocyanine green, a dye that is administered intravenously to visualize microvascular perfusion when excited using near-infrared light. Laser speckle contrast imaging produces non-contact large surface-based tissue perfusion imaging free from movement- or pressure-related artefacts. In this review, we discuss the intrinsic advantages and disadvantages of these techniques and their clinical and/or scientific applications.

A pilot trial to evaluate the clinical usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in predicting renal outcomes in patients with acute kidney injury

Objectives

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) enables the assessment of real-time renal microcirculation. This study investigated CEUS-driven parameters as hemodynamic predictors for renal outcomes in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI).

Methods

Forty-eight patients who were diagnosed with AKI were prospectively enrolled and underwent CEUS at the occurrence of AKI. Parameters measured were the wash-in slope (WIS), time to peak intensity, peak intensity (PI), area under the time–intensity curve (AUC), mean transit time (MTT), time for full width at half maximum, and rise time (RT). The predictive performance of the CEUS-driven parameters for Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) AKI stage, initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT), AKI recovery, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression was assessed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CEUS.

Results

Cortical RT (Odds ratio [OR] = 1.21) predicted the KDIGO stage 3 AKI. Cortical MTT (OR = 1.07) and RT (OR = 1.20) predicted the initiation of RRT. Cortical WIS (OR = 76.23) and medullary PI (OR = 1.25) predicted AKI recovery. Medullary PI (OR = 0.78) and AUC (OR = 1.00) predicted CKD progression. The areas under the ROC curves showed reasonable performance for predicting the initiation of RRT and AKI recovery. The sensitivity and specificity of the quantitative CEUS parameters were 60–83% and 62–77%, respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.69–0.75.

Conclusion

CEUS may be a supplemental tool in diagnosing the severity of AKI and predicting renal prognosis in patients with AKI.

The AFSUMB Consensus Statements and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound using Sonazoid

The first edition of the guidelines for the use of ultrasound contrast agents was published in 2004, dealing with liver applications. The second edition of the guidelines in 2008 reflected changes in the available contrast agents and updated the guidelines for the liver, as well as implementing some nonliver applications. The third edition of the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) guidelines was the joint World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology-European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB-EFSUMB) venture in conjunction with other regional US societies such as Asian Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, resulting in a simultaneous duplicate on liver CEUS in the official journals of both WFUMB and EFSUMB in 2013. However, no guidelines were described mainly for Sonazoid due to limited clinical experience only in Japan and Korea. The new proposed consensus statements and recommendations provide general advice on the use of Sonazoid and are intended to create standard protocols for the use and administration of Sonazoid in hepatic and pancreatobiliary applications in Asian patients and to improve patient management.

The AFSUMB Consensus Statements and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound using Sonazoid

The first edition of the guidelines for the use of ultrasound contrast agents was published in 2004, dealing with liver applications. The second edition of the guidelines in 2008 reflected changes in the available contrast agents and updated the guidelines for the liver, as well as implementing some nonliver applications. The third edition of the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) guidelines was the joint World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology-European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB-EFSUMB) venture in conjunction with other regional US societies such as Asian Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, resulting in a simultaneous duplicate on liver CEUS in the official journals of both WFUMB and EFSUMB in 2013. However, no guidelines were described mainly for Sonazoid due to limited clinical experience only in Japan and Korea. The new proposed consensus statements and recommendations provide general advice on the use of Sonazoid and are intended to create standard protocols for the use and administration of Sonazoid in hepatic and pancreatobiliary applications in Asian patients and to improve patient management.

Differentiation of atypical hepatic hemangioma from liver metastases: Diagnostic performance of a novel type of color contrast enhanced ultrasound

BACKGROUND

In clinical practice, the diagnosis is sometimes difficult with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) when the case has an atypical perfusion pattern. Color parametric imaging (CPI) is an analysis software for CEUS with better detection of temporal differences in CEUS imaging using arbitrary colors. It measures the differences in arrival time of the contrast agent in lesions so that the perfusion features of atypical hemangioma and colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastasis can be distinguished.

AIM

To evaluate the role of a novel type of CPI of CEUS in the differential diagnosis of atypical hemangioma from liver metastases in patients with a history of CRC.

METHODS

From January 2016 to July 2018, 42 patients including 20 cases of atypical hemangioma and 22 cases of liver metastases from CRC were enrolled. These patients had a mean age of 60.5 ± 9.3 years (range: 39-75 years). All patients received ultrasound, CEUS and CPI examinations. Resident and staff radiologists independently and retrospectively reviewed CEUS and CPI images. Two sets of criteria were assigned: (1) Routine CEUS alone; and (2) CEUS and CPI. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of resident and staff radiologists were analyzed.

RESULTS

The following CPI features were significantly different between liver hemangioma and liver metastases analyzed by staff and resident radiologists: Peripheral nodular enhancement (65%-70.0% vs 4.5%-13.6%, P < 0.001, P = 0.001), mosaic/chaotic enhancement (5%-10% vs 68.2%-63.6%, P < 0.001, P < 0.001) and feeding artery (20% vs 59.1%-54.5%, P = 0.010, P = 0.021). CPI imaging offered significant improvements in detection rates compared with routine CEUS in both resident and staff groups. By resident radiologists, the specificity and accuracy of CEUS+CPI were significantly increased compared with that of CEUS (77.3% vs 45.5%, P = 0.030; 78.6% vs 50.0%, P = 0.006). In addition, the area under the curve (AUC) of CEUS+CPI was significantly higher than that of CEUS (0.803 vs 0.757, P = 0.036). By staff radiologists, accuracy was improved in CEUS+CPI (81.0% vs 54.8%, P = 0.010), whereas no significant differences in specificity and sensitivity were found (P = 0.144, P = 0.112). The AUC of CEUS+CPI was significantly higher than that of CEUS (0.890 vs 0.825, P = 0.013) by staff radiologists.

CONCLUSION

Compared with routine CEUS, CPI could provide specific information on the hemodynamic features of liver lesions and help to differentiate atypical hemangioma from liver metastases in patients with CRC, even for senior radiologists.

Application of new ultrasound techniques for focal liver lesions

Ultrasonography (US) has the overwhelming advantages of not entailing radiation exposure and being a noninvasive, real-time, convenient, easy-to-perform, and relatively inexpensive imaging modality. It is used as the first-line imaging modality for screening, detection, and diagnosis of focal liver lesions (FLLs) [small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), in particular]. However, with the increasing demand for accurate and early diagnosis of small HCCs, newer radiologic methods need to be explored to overcome certain limitations of US. For example, the imaging is easily negatively affected by the presence of gas, rib cage, and subcutaneous fat, and is insensitive for capturing the subtle but vital information on the blood flow. It was in response to this need that new promising technologies such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound and fusion imaging were introduced for the detection of liver lesions. This paper presents an overview of the epidemiology and mechanisms of the development of HCCs, with an emphasis on the application of US in the diagnosis and treatment of FLLs. The aim of this article is to provide the state-of-the-art developments in the imaging diagnosis of FLLs and evaluation of ablation treatment of early HCCs. By keeping abreast of these recent advances, we hope that doctors and researchers working in the field of diagnosis/treatment of liver diseases will be able to discriminate benign FLLs such as regenerative nodules and focal nodular hyperplasia from HCCs, so as to avoid unnecessary repeated tumor biopsies and overtreatment. In particular, we expect that small HCCs or precancerous nodules (such as dysplastic nodules) can be accurately diagnosed and appropriately treated even at an early stage.

A novel method to determine hepatic segments using Sonazoid, an ultrasound contrast agent

The conventional radiologic method for liver segmentation is based on the position of the hepatic and portal veins. However, during surgery, liver segments are resected based on the distribution of hepatic portal blood flow. This discrepancy can lead to a number of problems, such as miscommunication among clinicians, missing the location of the segment with the hepatic mass, and the risk of extended hepatic resection. We suggest a novel method to determine hepatic segments based on portal blood flow, as in the surgical approach, but by using high and low mechanical indexes in contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with Sonazoid. This approach is helpful for preoperatively determining hepatic segments and reducing the risk of missing the location of a hepatic tumor or extended hepatic resection.

Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of Gastric Cancer: Correlation with Perfusion CT and Histopathology

Objective

To assess the relationship between contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) parameters and perfusion CT (PCT) parameters of gastric cancers and their correlation with histologic features.

Materials and Methods

This prospective study was approved by our Institutional Review Board. We included 43 patients with pathologically-proven gastric cancers undergoing CEUS using SonoVue® (Bracco) and PCT on the same day. Correlation between the CEUS parameters (peak intensity [PI], area under the curve [AUC], rise time [RT] from 10% to 90% of PI, time to peak [TTP_US], and mean transit time [MTT_US]) and PCT parameters (blood flow, blood volume, TTP_CT, MTT_CT, and permeability surface product) of gastric cancers were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation test. In cases of surgical resection, the CEUS and PCT parameters were compared according to histologic features using Mann-Whitney test.

Results

CEUS studies were of diagnostic quality in 88.4% (38/43) of patients. Among the CEUS parameters of gastric cancers, RT and TTP_US showed significant positive correlations with TTP_CT (rho = 0.327 and 0.374, p = 0.045 and 0.021, respectively); PI and AUC were significantly higher in well-differentiated or moderately-differentiated tumors (n = 4) than poorly-differentiated tumors (n = 18) (p = 0.026 and 0.033, respectively), whereas MTT_CT showed significant differences according to histologic types (poorly cohesive carcinoma [PCC] vs. non-PCC), T-staging (≤ T2 vs. ≥ T3), N-staging (N0 vs. N-positive), and epidermal growth factor receptor expression (≤ faint vs. ≥ moderate staining) (p values < 0.05).

Conclusion

In patients with gastric cancers, CEUS is technically feasible for the quantification of tumor perfusion and may provide correlative and complementary information to that of PCT, which may allow prediction of histologic features.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Sclerotherapy for Ovarian Endometrial Cyst

We investigated contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) characteristics related to the perfusion pattern and parameters of the time-intensity curve of ovarian endometrial cysts (OECs) pre- and post-sclerotherapy. Forty-three patients with one-sided, single, untreated OECs underwent CEUS pre- and post-sclerotherapy. OEC wall thickness was measured by 2-D ultrasonography and CEUS, and CEUS enhancement patterns and time-intensity curve parameters before and after sclerotherapy were compared. OEC wall thickness remained essentially unchanged post-sclerotherapy. Wall thickness was significantly larger on 2-D ultrasonography than on CEUS. The OEC wall exhibited rapid enhancement and slow clearance both pre- and post-sclerotherapy. Wash-in and wash-out times remained unchanged. The wall exhibited iso-enhancement pre-sclerotherapy, but low and partially uneven enhancement post-sclerotherapy. Post-treatment, time to peak was delayed, peak intensity was reduced and perfusion slope was decreased. The contrast agent arrival time and area under the curve remained similar. CEUS enhancement patterns and quantitative parameters were altered post-sclerotherapy; thus, treatments involving sclerosing agent retention can help to improve the efficacy of sclerotherapy for OEC.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Versus Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography for Assessment of Residual Tumor From Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Transarterial Chemoembolization: A Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study reviewed the literature to directly evaluate the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) versus contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for assessing residual tumors of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transarterial chemoembolization.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched through April 30, 2017. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and summary receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated and compared to examine the diagnostic performance of CEUS versus CECT.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies, including 421 patients and 491 nodules were analyzed. The pooled diagnostic performances of CEUS versus CECT were as follows: (1) sensitivity (95% confidence interval), 0.97 (0.95-0.99) versus 0.72 (0.67-0.76); (2) specificity, 0.86 (0.74-0.94) versus 0.99 (0.95-1.00); (3) positive predictive value, 0.97 (0.95-0.99) versus 1.00 (0.98-1.00); (4) negative predictive value, 0.90 (0.83-0.95) versus 0.51 (0.44-0.58); (5) positive likelihood ratio, 7.79 (4.73-12.82) versus 12.50 (5.74-27.20); (6) negative likelihood ratio, 0.05 (0.03-0.09) versus 0.35 (0.26-0.48); (7) diagnostic odds ratio, 150.56 (57.03-397.49) versus 35.54 (14.89-84.83); and (8) area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.9875 versus 0.9239. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of CEUS were significantly higher than those of CECT (both P < .001). The specificity and positive predictive value of CECT were significantly higher than those of CEUS (both P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast-enhanced US, with better sensitivity and negative predictive value versus CECT, was an effective method for exclusion of residual tumors after transarterial chemoembolization. Contrast-enhanced CT, with higher specificity than CEUS, is a valid approach for identifying residual tumors.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of the Liver: Optimizing Technique and Clinical Applications

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to review the general principles, technique, and clinical applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver.

CONCLUSION

Proper technique and optimization of contrast-enhanced ultrasound require a balance between maintaining the integrity of the microbubble contrast agent and preserving the ultrasound signal. Established and emerging applications in the liver include diagnosis of focal lesions, aiding ultrasound-guided intervention, monitoring of therapy, and aiding surgical management.

Focal Liver Lesions: Computer-aided Diagnosis by Using Contrast-enhanced US Cine Recordings

Purpose To assess the performance of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems and to determine the dominant ultrasonographic (US) features when classifying benign versus malignant focal liver lesions (FLLs) by using contrast material-enhanced US cine clips. Materials and Methods One hundred six US data sets in all subjects enrolled by three centers from a multicenter trial that included 54 malignant, 51 benign, and one indeterminate FLL were retrospectively analyzed. The 105 benign or malignant lesions were confirmed at histologic examination, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and/or 6 or more months of clinical follow-up. Data sets included 3-minute cine clips that were automatically corrected for in-plane motion and automatically filtered out frames acquired off plane. B-mode and contrast-specific features were automatically extracted on a pixel-by-pixel basis and analyzed by using an artificial neural network (ANN) and a support vector machine (SVM). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) for CAD were compared with those for one experienced and one inexperienced blinded reader. A third observer graded cine quality to assess its effects on CAD performance. Results CAD, the inexperienced observer, and the experienced observer were able to analyze 95, 100, and 102 cine clips, respectively. The AUCs for the SVM, ANN, and experienced and inexperienced observers were 0.883 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.793, 0.940), 0.829 (95% CI: 0.724, 0.901), 0.843 (95% CI: 0.756, 0.903), and 0.702 (95% CI: 0.586, 0.782), respectively; only the difference between SVM and the inexperienced observer was statistically significant. Accuracy improved from 71.3% (67 of 94; 95% CI: 60.6%, 79.8%) to 87.7% (57 of 65; 95% CI: 78.5%, 93.8%) and from 80.9% (76 of 94; 95% CI: 72.3%, 88.3%) to 90.3% (65 of 72; 95% CI: 80.6%, 95.8%) when CAD was in agreement with the inexperienced reader and when it was in agreement with the experienced reader, respectively. B-mode heterogeneity and contrast material washout were the most discriminating features selected by CAD for all iterations. CAD selected time-based time-intensity curve (TIC) features 99.0% (207 of 209) of the time to classify FLLs, versus 1.0% (two of 209) of the time for intensity-based features. None of the 15 video-quality criteria had a statistically significant effect on CAD accuracy-all P values were greater than the Holm-Sidak α-level correction for multiple comparisons. Conclusion CAD systems classified benign and malignant FLLs with an accuracy similar to that of an expert reader. CAD improved the accuracy of both readers. Time-based features of TIC were more discriminating than intensity-based features. ^© RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Hepatic Vein Arrival Time Performed with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography for Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background/Aims

We identified reports in the literature regarding the diagnostic accuracy of hepatic vein arrival time (HVAT) measured by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) to assess hepatic fibrosis in cirrhosis.

Methods

The Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for all studies published up to 23 July 2015 that evaluated liver status using CEUS and liver biopsy (LB). The QUADAS-II (quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies-II) was applied to assess the internal validity of the diagnostic studies. Selected studies were subjected to a meta-analysis with MetaDisc 1.4 and RevMan 5.3.

Results

A total of 12 studies including 844 patients with chronic liver disease met our inclusion criteria. The overall summary sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of the HVAT measured by CEUS for the detection of cirrhosis compared to LB were 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 0.89), 0.75 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.79), 3.45 (95% CI, 1.60 to 7.43), and 0.28 (95% CI, 0.10 to 0.74), respectively. The summary diagnostic odds ratio (random effects model) was 15.23 (95% CI, 3.07 to 75.47), the summary receiver operator characteristics area under the curve was 0.74 (standard error [SE]=0.14), and the index Q was 0.69 (SE=0.11).

Conclusions

Based on a systematic review, the measurement of HVAT by CEUS exhibited an increased accuracy and correlation for the detection of cirrhosis.

Added Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound on Biopsies of Focal Hepatic Lesions Invisible on Fusion Imaging Guidance

Objective

To assess whether contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) with Sonazoid can improve the lesion conspicuity and feasibility of percutaneous biopsies for focal hepatic lesions invisible on fusion imaging of real-time ultrasonography (US) with computed tomography/magnetic resonance images, and evaluate its impact on clinical decision making.

Materials and Methods

The Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective study. Between June 2013 and January 2015, 711 US-guided percutaneous biopsies were performed for focal hepatic lesions. Biopsies were performed using CEUS for guidance if lesions were invisible on fusion imaging. We retrospectively evaluated the number of target lesions initially invisible on fusion imaging that became visible after applying CEUS, using a 4-point scale. Technical success rates of biopsies were evaluated based on histopathological results. In addition, the occurrence of changes in clinical decision making was assessed.

Results

Among 711 patients, 16 patients (2.3%) were included in the study. The median size of target lesions was 1.1 cm (range, 0.5–1.9 cm) in pre-procedural imaging. After CEUS, 15 of 16 (93.8%) focal hepatic lesions were visualized. The conspicuity score was significantly increased after adding CEUS, as compared to that on fusion imaging (p < 0.001). The technical success rate of biopsy was 87.6% (14/16). After biopsy, there were changes in clinical decision making for 11 of 16 patients (68.8%).

Conclusion

The addition of CEUS could improve the conspicuity of focal hepatic lesions invisible on fusion imaging. This dual guidance using CEUS and fusion imaging may affect patient management via changes in clinical decision-making.

CONSUMER PREFERENCES FOR SCANNING MODALITY TO DIAGNOSE FOCAL LIVER LESIONS

OBJECTIVES

Differences in the process of using liver imaging technologies might be important to patients. This study aimed to investigate preferences for scanning modalities used in diagnosing focal liver lesions.

METHODS

A discrete choice experiment was administered to 504 adults aged 25 ≥years. Respondents made repeated choices between two hypothetical scans, described according to waiting time for scan and results, procedure type, the chance of minor side-effects, and whether further scanning procedures were likely to be required. Choice data were analyzed using mixed-logit models with respondent characteristics used to explain preference heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Respondents preferred shorter waiting times, the procedure to be undertaken with a handheld scanner on a couch instead of within a body scanner, no side-effects, and no follow–up scans (p≤.01). The average respondent was willing to wait an additional 2 weeks for the scan if it resulted in avoiding side-effects, 1.5 weeks to avoid further procedures or to be told the results immediately, and 1 week to have the scan performed on a couch with a handheld scanner. However, substantial heterogeneity was observed in the strength of preference for desirable imaging characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

An average individual belonging to a general population sub–group most likely to require imaging to characterize focal liver lesions in the United Kingdom would prefer contrast–enhanced ultrasound over magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography. Insights into the patient perspective around differential characteristics of imaging modalities have the potential to be used to guide recommendations around the use of these technologie

Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS in children with benign and malignant liver lesions and portal vein anomalies

OBJECTIVE

Comparison of the diagnostic findings of MRI, CT and CEUS in children with benign and malignant and portal venous anomalies of the liver.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Retrospective analysis of the diagnostic findings of CEUS, MRI and CT scans in 56 children (age 0-17 years) with a total of 60 benign and malignant liver lesions and anomalies of the portal vein/perfusion. All patients underwent CEUS using sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles and a multi-frequency probe (1-5 MHz, 6-9 MHz). Cine-loops were stored up to 3 minutes. MRI was performed in 38 lesions. CT was performed in 8 lesions.

RESULTS

Out of the 56 patients 49 liver lesions (48 benign, 1 malignant), 9 anomalies of the portal vein/perfusion and 2 of the biliary system were detected. 16/49 lesions were analyzed histopathologically. Using CEUS, the characterization of the lesions was possible in 45 out of 49 cases. In 32 cases, CEUS provided the exact diagnosis. Only two benign lesions were falsely categorized as malignant.Findings of MRI and CEUS were concordant in 84% of cases (n = 32/38). CEUS considered 1 benign lesion to be malignant. 2 lesions were not detectable and in 3 lesions no definite diagnosis was established using MRI.Findings of CT and CEUS were concordant in 5 of 8 cases. In 21 lesions CEUS as the only imaging modality was found to be sufficient for diagnostics.

CONCLUSION

Despite the restricted indications for using CEUS in children, it offers a high diagnostic detection rate (93%) for characterization of liver lesions and portal vein anomalies.

Optimal injection rate of ultrasound contrast agent for evaluation of focal liver lesions using an automatic power injector: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the optimal bolus injection rate of ultrasound (US) contrast agent in vascular imaging for focal liver lesions.

METHODS

Thirteen patients with 13 focal liver lesions (5 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) with cirrhosis, 4 liver metastases, 2 hemangiomas, 1 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 1 focal nodular hyperplasia) received two bolus injections of Sonazoid (at 0.5 and 2.0 mL/s) using an automatic power injector. The lesion-to-liver contrast ratio at peak enhancement was quantitatively evaluated. Enhancement of the lesions compared to liver parenchyma was assessed by two independent readers using a five-point scale and qualitatively evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

For all lesions, the contrast ratio was not significantly different between the two injection rates. For HCCs, the contrast ratio was higher at 0.5 mL/s (7.41 ± 6.56) than at 2.0 mL/s (4.28 ± 4.66, p = 0.025). For all lesions, the mean area under the ROC curve (AUC) was not significantly different between the two injection rates. For HCCs, the AUC was greater at 0.5 mL/s than at 2.0 mL/s (AUC: 0.86, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

In contrast-enhanced US, an injection rate of 0.5 mL/s is superior to an injection rate of 2.0 mL/s for the quantitative and qualitative analysis of HCCs in the cirrhotic liver.

Contrast agents in diagnostic imaging: Present and future

Specific contrast agents have been developed for x ray examinations (mainly CT), sonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Most of them are extracellular agents which create different enhancement on basis of different vascularization or on basis of different interstitial network in tissues, but some can be targeted to a particular cell line (e.g. hepatocyte). Microbubbles can be used as carrier for therapeutic drugs which can be released in specific targets under sonographic guidance, decreasing systemic toxicity and increasing therapeutic effect. Radiologists have to choose a particular contrast agent knowing its physical and chemical properties and the possibility of adverse reactions and balancing them with the clinical benefits of a more accurate diagnosis. As for any drug, contrast agents can cause adverse events, which are more frequent with Iodine based CA, but also with Gd based CA and even with sonographic contrast agents hypersensitivity reaction can occur.

The usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma viability after transarterial chemoembolization: pilot study

Background/Aims

The therapeutic effect of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is usually assessed using multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). However, dense lipiodol depositions can mask the enhancement of viable HCC tissue in MDCT. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) could be effective in detecting small areas of viability and patency in vessels. We investigated whether arterial enhancement in CEUS after treatment with TACE can be used to detect HCC viability earlier than when using MDCT.

Methods

Twelve patients received CEUS, MDCT, and gadoxetic-acid-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at baseline and 4 and 12 weeks after TACE. The definition of viable HCC was defined as MRI positivity after 4 or 12 weeks.

Results

Eight of the 12 patients showed MRI positivity at 4 or 12 weeks. All patients with positive CEUS findings at 4 weeks (n=8) showed MRI positivity and residual viable HCC at 4 or 12 weeks. Five of the eight patients with positive CEUS findings at 4 weeks had negative results on the 4-week MDCT scan. Four (50%) of these eight patients did not have MRI positivity at 4 weeks and were ultimately confirmed as having residual HCC tissue at the 12-week MRI. Kappa statistics revealed near-perfect agreement between CEUS and MRI (κ=1.00) and substantial agreement between MDCT and MRI (κ=0.67).

Conclusions

In the assessment of the response to TACE, CEUS at 4 weeks showed excellent results for detecting residual viable HCC, which suggests that CEUS can be used as an early additive diagnosis tool when deciding early additional treatment with TACE.

Predictive factors of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the response to transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma

Background/Aims

The predictive role of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) before performing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has not been determined. We assessed the possible predictive factors of CEUS for the response to TACE.

Methods

Seventeen patients with 18 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) underwent TACE. All of the tumors were studied with CEUS before TACE using a second-generation ultrasound contrast agent (SonoVue®, Bracco, Milan, Italy). The tumor response to TACE was classified with a score between 1 and 4 according to the remaining enhancing-tumor percentage based on modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST): 1, enhancing tumor <25%; 2, 25%≤enhancing tumor<50%; 3, 50%≤enhancing tumor<75%; and 4, enhancing tumor≥75%). A score of 1 was defined as a "good response" to TACE. The predictive factors for the response to TACE were evaluated during CEUS based on the maximum tumor diameter, initial arterial enhancing time, arterial enhancing duration, intensity of arterial enhancement, presence of a hypoenhanced pattern, and the feeding artery to the tumor.

Results

The median tumor size was 3.1 cm. The distribution of tumor response scores after TACE in all tumors was as follows: 1, n=11; 2, n=4; 3, n=2; and 4, n=1. Fifteen tumors showed feeding arteries. The presence of a feeding artery and the tumor size (≤5 cm) were the predictive factors for a good response (P=0.043 and P=0.047, respectively).

Conclusions

The presence of a feeding artery and a tumor size of less than 5 cm were the predictive factors for a good response of HCC to TACE on CEUS.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Controversy over the ASSLD Guideline

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are both regarded as primary liver cancers, having different biological behaviors and prognoses. Correct differentiation between them is essential for surgical planning and prognosis assessment. In 2005, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) recommended that noninvasive diagnosis of HCC is achievable by a single dynamic technique (including contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)) showing intense arterial uptake followed by washout of contrast in the venous-delayed phases. However, CEUS has been dropped from the diagnostic techniques in the latest AASLD guideline according to the opinion of some authors from Europe that CEUS may offer false positive HCC diagnosis in patients with ICC. Since the update of AASLD guideline has been released, increased attention has been paid to this interesting topic. Remarkable controversy over this issue is present and this removal was not well received in Europe and Asia. This commentary summarized the opinions for the role of CUES in differentiation between HCC and ICC in recent years. It is concluded that prospective studies with strict design and large case series are mandatory to solve the controversies and stratification of ICC in terms of tumor size and liver background is also essential.

Biomarkers in HCV Infection

Liver-related biomarkers have been developed and validated mainly in patients with chronic hepatitis C for the prediction of liver fibrosis or cirrhosis, which is a final pathway of chronic liver injury. They are noninvasive, traceable, and easy-to-use. Biomarkers provide implications related to screening, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of chronic hepatitis. For the improvement of performance and coverage, biomarker panels, imaging biomarkers, and even genetic biomarkers have been developed. With the advancement of genomics and proteomics, earlier and more precise prediction is expected in the near future. In this review, multiple biomarker panels for the estimation of the degree of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C, biomarkers for the screening and diagnosis of hepatitis C, biomarkers for the treatment of hepatitis C, biomarkers for the prediction of complications related to the chronic hepatitis C, and future perspectives will be summarized.

Inertial cavitation threshold of nested microbubbles

Cavitation of ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) promotes both beneficial and detrimental bioeffects in vivo (Radhakrishnan et al., 2013) [1]. The ability to determine the inertial cavitation threshold of UCA microbubbles has potential application in contrast imaging, development of therapeutic agents, and evaluation of localized effects on the body (Ammi et al., 2006) [2]. This study evaluates a novel UCA and its inertial cavitation behavior as determined by a home built cavitation detection system. Two 2.25 MHz transducers are placed at a 90° angle to one another where one transducer is driven by a high voltage pulser and the other transducer receives the signal from the oscillating microbubble. The sample chamber is placed in the overlap of the focal region of the two transducers where the microbubbles are exposed to a pulser signal consisting of 600 pulse trains per experiment at a pulse repetition frequency of 5 Hz where each train has four pulses of four cycles. The formulation being analyzed is comprised of an SF6 microbubble coated by a DSPC PEG-3000 monolayer nested within a poly-lactic acid (PLA) spherical shell. The effect of varying shell diameters and microbubble concentration on cavitation threshold profile for peak negative pressures ranging from 50 kPa to 2 MPa are presented and discussed in this paper. The nesting shell decreases inertial cavitation events from 97.96% for an un-nested microbubble to 19.09% for the same microbubbles nested within a 2.53 μm shell. As shell diameter decreases, the percentage of inertially cavitating microbubbles also decreases. For nesting formulations with average outer capsule diameters of 20.52, 14.95, 9.95, 5.55, 2.53, and 1.95 μm, the percentage of sample destroyed at 1 MPa was 51.02, 38.94, 33.25, 25.27, 19.09, and 5.37% respectively.

Hepatic hemangioma -review-

Hepatic hemangiomas are benign tumors of the liver consisting of clusters of blood-filled cavities, lined by endothelial cells, fed by the hepatic artery. The vast majority of HH are asymptomatic, most often being discovered incidentally during imaging investigations for various unrelated pathologies. Typical hemangiomas, the so-called capillary hemangiomas, range from a few mm to 3 cm, do not increase in size over time and therefore are unlikely to generate future symptomatology. Small (mm-3 cm) and medium (3 cm-10 cm) hemangiomas are well-defined lesions, requiring no active treatment beside regular follow-ups. However, the so-called giant liver hemangiomas, of up to 10 cm (most commonly) and even 20+ cm in size (according to occasional reports) can, and usually will develop symptoms and complications that require prompt surgical intervention or other kind of therapy. HH belong to the class of hepatic "incidentalomas", so-called because they are diagnosed incidentally, on imaging studies performed as routine examinations or for other reasons than the evaluation of a possible liver mass. Less than half of HH present with overt clinical symptoms, consisting, most often, of upper abdominal pain (this is usually the case for large lesions, which cause the distension of Glisson's capsule). Hepatic hemangiomas require a careful diagnosis to differentiate from other focal hepatic lesions, co-occurring diagnoses are also possible.

Clinically useful diagnostic tool of contrast enhanced ultrasonography for focal liver masses: comparison to computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

Background/Aims

To evaluate the diagnostic value of contrast (SonoVue®) enhancement ultrasonography (CEUS) and to compare this method with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluating liver masses.

Methods

CEUS (n=50), CT (n=47), and MRI (n=43) were performed on 50 liver masses in 48 patients for baseline mass characterization. The most likely impression for each modality and the final diagnosis, based on the combined biopsy results (n=14), angiography findings (n=36), and clinical course, were determined. The diagnostic value of CEUS was compared to those of CT and MRI.

Results

The final diagnosis of the masses was hepatocellular carcinoma (n=43), hemangioma (n=3), benign adenoma (n=2), eosinophilic abscess (n=1), and liver metastasis (n=1). The overall diagnostic agreement with the final diagnosis was substantial for CEUS, CT, and MRI, with κ values of 0.621, 0.763, and 0.784, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 83.3%, 87.5%, and 84.0%, respectively, for CEUS; 95.0%, 87.5%, and 93.8%, respectively, for CT; and 94.6%, 83.3%, and 93.0%, respectively for MRI. After excluding the lesions with poor acoustic sonographic windows, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for CEUS were 94.6%, 87.5%, and 93.3%, respectively, with a κ value of 0.765.

Conclusions

If an appropriate acoustic window is available, CEUS is comparable to CT and MRI for the diagnosis of liver masses.

[Liver ultrasound: focal lesions and diffuse diseases]

Liver ultrasound is frequently used as a first-line technique for the detection and characterization of the most common liver lesions, especially those incidentally found focal liver lesions, and for monitoring of chronic liver diseases. Ultrasound is not only used in the Bmode, but also with Doppler and, more recently, contrast-enhanced ultrasound. It is mainly used in the diagnosis of diffuse liver diseases, such as steatosis or cirrhosis. This article presents a practical approach for diagnosis workup, in which the different characteristics of the main focal liver lesions and diffuse liver diseases are reviewed.

Influence of nesting shell size on brightness longevity and resistance to ultrasound-induced dissolution during enhanced B-mode contrast imaging

This study aims to bridge the gap between transport mechanisms of an improved ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) and its resulting behavior in a clinical imaging study. Phospholipid-shelled microbubbles nested within the aqueous core of a polymer microcapsule are examined for their use and feasibility as an improved UCA. The nested formulation provides contrast comparable to traditional formulations, specifically an SF6 microbubble coated by a DSPC PEG-3000 monolayer, with the advantage that contrast persists at least nine times longer in a mock clinical, in vitro setting. The effectiveness of the sample was measured using a contrast ratio in units of decibels (dB) which compares the brightness of the nested microbubbles to a reference value of a phantom tissue mimic. During a 40min imaging study, six nesting formulations with average outer capsule diameters of 1.95, 2.53, 5.55, 9.95, 14.95, and 20.51μm reached final contrast ratio values of 0.25, 2.35, 3.68, 4.51, 5.93, and 8.00dB, respectively. The starting contrast ratio in each case was approximately 8dB and accounts for the brightness attributed to the nesting shell. As compared with empty microcapsules (no microbubbles nested within), enhancement of the initial contrast ratio increased systematically with decreasing microcapsule size. The time required to reach a steady state in the temporal contrast ratio profile also varied with microcapsule diameter and was found to be 420s for each of the four smallest shell diameters and 210s and 150s, respectively, for the largest two shell diameters. All nested formulations were longer-lived and gave higher final contrast ratios than a control sample comprising un-nested, but otherwise equivalent, microbubbles. Specifically, the contrast ratio of the un-nested microbubbles decreased to a negative value after 4min of continuous ultrasound exposure with complete disappearance of the microbubbles after 15min whereas all nested formulations maintained positive contrast ratio values for the duration of the 40min trial. The results are consistent with two distinct stages of gas transport: in the first stage, passive diffusion occurs under ambient conditions across the microbubble monolayer within the first few minutes after formulation until the aqueous interior of the microcapsule is saturated with gas; in the second stage ultrasound drives additional gas dissolution even further due to pressure modulation. It is important to understand the chemistry and transport mechanisms of this contrast agent under the influence of ultrasound to attain better perspicacity for enhanced applications in imaging. Results from this study will facilitate future preclinical studies and clinical applications of nested microbubbles for therapeutic and diagnostic imaging.

Alcohol and hepatocellular carcinoma: A review and a point of view

It is well recognized that one cause of chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is alcohol consumption. Research in Italy and the United States concludes that the most common cause of HCC (responsible for 32% to 45% of HCC) is alcohol. It has recently been shown that a significant relationship between alcohol intake, metabolic changes, and hepatitis virus infection does exist. Alcohol may be a factor in the development of HCC via direct (genotoxic) and indirect mechanisms (cirrhosis). There is only one way of diagnosing HCC, which is early identification through surveillance, when curative treatments become possible. After stopping alcohol intake the risk of liver cancer decreases by 6% to 7% a year, and an estimated time period of 23 years is also needed. Therefore, surveillance is also important in former drinkers and, in our opinion, independently from the presence of compensated cirrhosis. In cases of very early stage (VES) and early stage with portal hypertension, liver transplantation is the optimal option; and in cases of associated disease, percutaneous ethanol injections, radiofrequency and microwave ablation are the ideal treatments. Despite the possibility of detecting microvascular invasion with HR, several studies and some randomized controlled trials revealed that overall survival and DSF rates in patients with VES HCC are much the same after ablation and HR. Therefore, ablation can be regarded as a first-line choice for patients with VES HCC. It is important to emphasize that the choice of treatment should be weighed carefully in the context of a multidisciplinary cancer team.