Cognitive Impairment During Combined Normobaric vs. Hypobaric and Normoxic vs. Hypoxic Acute Exposure

Relative Severity of Human Performance Decrements Recorded in Rapid vs. Gradual Decompression

INTRODUCTION: Cabin decompression presents a threat in high-altitude-capable aircraft. A chamber study was performed to compare effects of rapid (RD) vs. gradual decompression and gauge impairment at altitude with and without hypoxia, as well as to assess recovery.METHODS: There were 12 participants who completed RD (1 s) and Gradual (3 min 12 s) ascents from 2743-7620 m (9000-25000 ft) altitude pressures while breathing air or 100% O₂. Physiological indices included oxygen saturation (SPo₂), heart rate (HR), respiration, end tidal O₂ and CO₂ partial pressures, and electroencephalography (EEG). Cognition was evaluated using SYNWIN, which combines memory, arithmetic, visual, and auditory tasks. The study incorporated ascent rate (RD, gradual), breathing gas (air, 100% O₂) and epoch (ground-level, pre-breathe, ascent-altitude, recovery) as factors.RESULTS: Physiological effects in hypoxic "air" ascents included decreased SPo₂ and end tidal O₂ and CO₂ partial pressures (hypocapnia), with elevated HR and minute ventilation (V˙E); SPo₂ and HR effects were greater after RD (-7.3% lower and +10.0 bpm higher, respectively). HR and V˙E decreased during recovery. SYNWIN performance declined during ascent in air, with key metrics, including composite score, falling further (-75% vs. -50%) after RD. Broad cognitive impairment was not recorded on 100% O₂, nor in recovery. EEG signals showed increased slow-wave activity during hypoxia.DISCUSSION: In hypoxic exposures, RD impaired performance more than gradual ascent. Hypobaria did not comprehensively impair performance without hypoxia. Lingering impairment was not observed during recovery, but HR and V˙E metrics suggested compensatory slowing following altitude stress. Participants' cognitive strategy shifted as hypoxia progressed, with efficiency giving way to "satisficing," redistributing effort to easier tasks.Beer J, Mojica AJ, Blacker KJ, Dart TS, Morse BG, Sherman PM. Relative severity of human performance decrements recorded in rapid vs. gradual decompression. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2024; 95(7):353-366.

Comparing neuronal oscillations during visual spatial attention orienting between normobaric and hypobaric hypoxia

Normobaric hypoxia (NH) and hypobaric hypoxia (HH) are both used to train aircraft pilots to recognize symptoms of hypoxia. NH (low oxygen concentration) training is often preferred because it is more cost effective, simpler, and safer than HH. It is unclear, however, whether NH is neurophysiologically equivalent to HH (high altitude). Previous studies have shown that neural oscillations, particularly those in the alpha band (8-12 Hz), are impacted by hypoxia. Attention tasks have been shown to reliably modulate alpha oscillations, although the neurophysiological impacts of hypoxia during cognitive processing remains poorly understood. To address this we investigated induced and evoked power alongside physiological data while participants performed an attention task during control (normobaric normoxia or NN), NH (fraction of inspired oxygen = 12.8%, partial pressure of inspired oxygen = 87.2 mmHg), and HH (3962 m, partial pressure of inspired oxygen = 87.2 mmHg) conditions inside a hypobaric chamber. No significant differences between NH and HH were found in oxygen saturation, end tidal gases, breathing rate, middle cerebral artery velocity and blood pressure. Induced alpha power was significantly decreased in NH and HH when compared to NN. Participants in the HH condition showed significantly increased induced lower-beta power and evoked higher-beta power, compared with the NH and NN conditions, indicating that NH and HH differ in their impact on neurophysiological activity supporting cognition. NH and HH were found not to be neurophysiologically equivalent as electroencephalography was able to differentiate NH from HH.

Associations between spontaneous electroencephalogram oscillations and oxygen saturation across normobaric and hypobaric hypoxia

High-altitude indoctrination (HAI) trains individuals to recognize symptoms of hypoxia by simulating high-altitude conditions using normobaric (NH) or hypobaric (HH) hypoxia. Previous studies suggest that despite equivalent inspired oxygen levels, physiological differences could exist between these conditions. In particular, differences in neurophysiological responses to these conditions are not clear. Our study aimed to investigate correlations between oxygen saturation (SpO₂ ) and neural responses in NH and HH. We recorded 5-min of resting-state eyes-open electroencephalogram (EEG) and SpO₂ during control, NH, and HH conditions from 13 participants. We applied a multivariate framework to characterize correlations between SpO₂ and EEG measures (spectral power and multiscale entropy [MSE]), within each participant and at the group level. Participants were desaturating during the first 150 s of NH versus steadily desaturated in HH. We considered the entire time interval, first and second half intervals, separately. All the conditions were characterized by statistically significant participant-specific patterns of EEG-SpO₂ correlations. However, at the group level, the desaturation period expressed a robust pattern of these correlations across frequencies and brain locations. Specifically, the first 150 s of NH during desaturation differed significantly from the other conditions with negative absolute alpha power-SpO₂ correlations and positive MSE-SpO₂ correlations. Once steadily desaturated, NH and HH had no significant differences in EEG-SpO₂ correlations. Our findings indicate that the desaturating phase of hypoxia is a critical period in HAI courses, which would require developing strategies for mitigating the hypoxic stimulus in a real-world situation.

Moderate and Severe Acute Normobaric Hypoxia and the 3-Repetition Deadlift, Hand-Release Push-Up, and Leg Tuck Events From the Army Combat Fitness Test

INTRODUCTION

The newly implemented Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) of the U.S. Army seeks to revolutionize the Army's fitness culture and reduce the rate of preventable injuries among soldiers. The initial rollout of the ACFT has been met with several challenges, including a gender-neutral scoring system. The ACFT has undergone several revisions to adapt to the present state of U.S. Army physical fitness; however, the test faces several more obstacles as more data become available. The ACFT was designed to measure combat readiness, a useful tool for units facing deployment or a change in duty station to a high-altitude environment. Reduced oxygen availability (hypoxia) at high altitude influences many physiological functions associated with physical fitness, such that there is an increased demand for oxygen in exercising muscle. Therefore, the purpose was to investigate the effects of normoxic and two levels of hypoxia exposure (moderate and severe; fraction of inspired oxygen [FiO2]: 16.0% and 14.3%) during the 3-repetition deadlift (MDL), hand-release push-up (HRP), and leg tuck (LTK) events of the ACFT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourteen recreationally active men (n = 10) and women (n = 4) soldier analogs (27.36 ± 1.12 years, height 1.71 ± 2.79 m, weight 80.60 ± 4.24 kg) completed the MDL, HRP, and LTK at normoxia and acute normobaric moderate (MH; FiO2 16%) and severe (SH; FiO2 14.3%) hypoxic exposure. Scores and performance were recorded for each event, and heart rate (HR) and total body oxygen saturation (SpO2) were monitored throughout. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess differences in modified ACFT scores, performance, HR, and SpO2 among hypoxic conditions, with follow-up one-way ANOVA and paired t-test when appropriate.

RESULTS

Total body oxygen saturation was decreased at MH and SH conditions compared to normoxia but did not vary between ACFT events. Heart rate was not influenced by altitude but did increase in response to exercise. Scores of the modified total and individual ACFT events were not different between normoxia, MH, and SH. There was also no difference in performance based on the amount of weight lifted during the MDL and number of repetitions of the HRP and LTK events in response to hypoxic exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Performance and scores of the modified ACFT were not influenced by acute normobaric MH and SH exposure compared to normoxia. Further investigations should examine the full testing battery of the ACFT to provide a comprehensive analysis and potential evidence for such differences.

Both Hypoxia and Hypobaria Impair Baroreflex Sensitivity but through Different Mechanisms

Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) is a measure of cardiovagal baroreflex and is lower in normobaric and hypobaric hypoxia compared to normobaric normoxia. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of hypobaria on BRS in normoxia and hypoxia. Continuous blood pressure and ventilation were recorded in eighteen seated participants in normobaric normoxia (NNx), hypobaric normoxia (HNx), normobaric hypoxia (NHx) and hypobaric hypoxia (HHx). Barometric pressure was matched between NNx vs. NHx (723±4 mmHg) and HNx vs. HHx (406±4 vs. 403±5 mmHg). Inspired oxygen pressure (PiO2) was matched between NNx vs. HNx (141.2±0.8 vs. 141.5±1.5 mmHg) and NHx vs. HHx (75.7±0.4 vs. 74.3±1.0 mmHg). BRS was assessed using the sequence method. BRS significantly decreased in HNx, NHx and HHx compared to NNx. Heart rate, mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures did not differ between conditions. There was the specific effect of hypobaria on BRS in normoxia (BRS was lower in HNx than in NNx). The hypoxic and hypobaric effects do not add to each other resulting in comparable BRS decreases in HNx, NHx and HHx. BRS decrease under low barometric pressure requires future studies independently controlling O2 and CO2 to identify central and peripheral chemoreceptors' roles.

Lingering Altitude Effects During Piloting and Navigation in a Synthetic Cockpit

INTRODUCTION: A study was performed to evaluate a cockpit flight simulation suite for measuring moderate altitude effects in a limited subject group. Objectives were to determine whether the apparatus can detect subtle deterioration, record physiological processes throughout hypobaric exposure, and assess recovery.METHODS: Eight subjects trained to perform precision instrument control (PICT) flight and unusual attitude recovery (UAR) and completed chamber flights dedicated to the PICT and UAR, respectively. Each flight comprised five epochs, including ground level pressure (GLP), ascent through altitude plateaus at 10,000, 14,000, and 17,500 ft (3050, 4270, and 5338 m), then postexposure recovery. PICT performance was assessed using control error (FSE) and time-out-of-bounds (TOOB) when pilots exited the flight corridor. UARs were assessed using response times needed to initiate correction and to achieve wings-level attitude. Physiological indices included S_po₂, heart rate (HR), end tidal O₂ and CO₂ pressures, and respiration metrics.RESULTS: Seven subjects completed both flights. PICT performance deteriorated at altitude: FSE increased 33% at 17,513 ft and 21% in Recovery vs. GLP. Mean TOOB increased from 11 s at GLP to 60 s in Recovery. UAR effects were less clear, with some evidence of accelerated responses during and after ascent.CONCLUSIONS: The test paradigm was shown to be effective; piloting impairment was detected during and after exposure. Physiological channels recorded a combination of hypoxia, elevated ventilation, and hypocapnia during ascent, followed by respiratory slowing in recovery. Findings indicate precision piloting and respiration are subject to changes during moderate altitude exposure and may remain altered after S_po₂ recovers, and changes may be linked to hypocapnia.Beer J, Morse B, Dart T, Adler S, Sherman P. Lingering altitude effects during piloting and navigation in a synthetic cockpit. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2023; 94(3):135-141.

The effects of normobaric and hypobaric hypoxia on cognitive performance and physiological responses: A crossover study

This partially randomised controlled, crossover study sought to investigate the effects of normobaric hypoxia (NH) and hypobaric hypoxia (HH) on cognitive performance, the physiological response at rest and after a 3-min step-test. Twenty healthy participants (10 females and 10 males, 27.6±6.2yrs, 73.6±13.7kg, 175.3±8.9cm) completed a cognitive performance test, followed by the modified Harvard-step protocol, in four environments: normobaric normoxia (NN; PiO2: 146.0±1.5mmHg), NH (PiO2: 100.9±1.3mmHg), HH at the first day of ascent (HH1: PiO2 = 105.6±0.4mmHg) and HH after an overnight stay (HH2: PiO2 = 106.0±0.5mmHg). At rest and/or exercise, SpO2, NIRS, and cardiovascular and perceptual data were collected. The cerebral tissue oxygenation index and the cognitive performance (throughput, accuracy, and reaction time) were not different between the hypoxic conditions (all p>0.05). In NH, SpO2 was higher compared to HH1 (ΔSpO2 NH vs HH1: 1.7±0.5%, p = 0.003) whilst heart rate (ΔHR NH vs HH2: 5.8±2.6 bpm, p = 0.03) and sympathetic activation (ΔSNSi NH vs HH2: 0.8±0.4, p = 0.03) were lower in NH compared to HH2. Heart rate (ΔHR HH1 vs HH2: 6.9±2.6 bpm, p = 0.01) and sympathetic action (ΔSNSi HH1 vs HH2: 0.9±0.4, p = 0.02) were both lower in HH1 compared to HH2. In conclusion, cognitive performance and cerebral oxygenation didn’t differ between the hypoxic conditions. SpO2 was only higher in NH compared to HH1. In HH2, heart rate and sympathetic activation were higher compared to both NH and HH1. These conclusions account for a PiO2 between 100–106 mmHg.

Hyperventilation and Hypoxia Hangover During Normobaric Hypoxia Training in Hawk Simulator

Introduction: In military aviation during high-altitude operations, an oxygen or cabin pressure emergency can impair brain function and performance. There are variations in individuals’ physiological responses to low partial pressure of oxygen and hypoxia symptoms can vary from one exposure to another. The aim of this study was to evaluate how normobaric hypoxia (NH) affects pilots’ minute ventilation and 10 min afterwards on Instrument Landing System (ILS) flight performance in Hawk simulator during a tactical flight sortie.

Methods: Fifteen volunteer fighter pilots from the Finnish Air Force participated in this double blinded, placebo controlled and randomized study. The subjects performed three flights in a tactical Hawk simulator in a randomized order with full flight gear, regulators and masks on. In the middle of the flight without the subjects’ knowledge, 21% (control), 8% or 6% oxygen in nitrogen was turned on. Minute ventilation (VE) was measured before, during NH and after NH. Forehead peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂), wireless ECG and subjective symptoms were documented. The flights were conducted so that both subjects and flight instructors were blinded to the gas mixture. The pilots performed tactical maneuvers at simulated altitude of 20,000 ft or 26,000 ft until they recognized the symptoms of hypoxia. Thereafter they performed hypoxia emergency procedures with 100% oxygen and returned to base (RTB). During the ILS approach, flight performance was evaluated.

Results: The mean VE increased during NH from 12.9 L/min (21% O2 on the control flight) to 17.8 L/min with 8% oxygen (p < 0.01), and to 21.0 L/min with 6% oxygen (p < 0.01). Ten minutes after combined hyperventilation and hypoxia, the ILS flight performance decreased from 4.4 (control flight) to 4.0 with 8% oxygen (p = 0.16) and to 3.2 with 6% oxygen (p < 0.01). A significant correlation (r = -0.472) was found between the subjects’ VE during 6% oxygen exposure and the ILS flight performance.

Discussion: Hyperventilation during NH has a long-lasting and dose-dependent effect on the pilot’s ILS flight performance, even though the hypoxia emergency procedures are executed 10 min earlier. Hyperventilation leads to body loss of carbon dioxide and hypocapnia which may even worsen the hypoxia hangover.

Exposure to hypoxia impairs helicopter pilots' awareness of environment

The purpose of the present study was to determine how hypoxia effects awareness of environment (AoE) in helicopter pilots operating at high altitude. Eight helicopter crews flew two operational flights in a flight simulator while breathing gas mixtures of 20.9% (equivalent to 0 m altitude) and 11.4% (equivalent to 4572 m or 15,000 ft altitude) oxygen in a single blinded, counterbalanced, repeated measures study. Each flight included five missions, during which environment items were introduced that the crews needed to be aware of, and respond to. In the 4572 m simulation, the crews missed overall 28 AoE items compared to 12 in the 0 m simulation (Z = -1.992; p = .046). In contrast, the crews' technical skills were not significantly effected by hypoxia. Remarkably, the majority of pilots did not notice they were hypoxic or recognise their hypoxia symptoms during the simulation flight at 4572 m. Practitioner summary We show that hypoxia has a detrimental effect on helicopter pilot's AoE and alertness. This can lead to an increased risk for flight safety. To mitigate this risk we recommend performing hypoxia training in a flight simulator, developing wearable systems for physiological monitoring of pilots and re-evaluating current altitude regulations. Abbreviations: ANOVA: Analysis of variance; AoE: awareness of environment; CSV: comma-separated values; HDU: helmet display unit; HR: heart rate; IQR: interquartile range; Mdn: median; NTS: non-technical skills; RNLAF: Royal Netherlands Air Force; PPM: parts per million; SpO2: oxygen saturation; SSS: Stanford sleepiness scale; TS: technical Skills.

Hypoxic Hypoxia and Brain Function in Military Aviation: Basic Physiology and Applied Perspectives

Acute hypobaric hypoxia (HH) is a major physiological threat during high-altitude flight and operations. In military aviation, although hypoxia-related fatalities are rare, incidences are common and are likely underreported. Hypoxia is a reduction in oxygen availability, which can impair brain function and performance of operational and safety-critical tasks. HH occurs at high altitude, due to the reduction in atmospheric oxygen pressure. This physiological state is also partially simulated in normobaric environments for training and research, by reducing the fraction of inspired oxygen to achieve comparable tissue oxygen saturation [normobaric hypoxia (NH)]. Hypoxia can occur in susceptible individuals below 10,000 ft (3,048 m) in unpressurised aircrafts and at higher altitudes in pressurised environments when life support systems malfunction or due to improper equipment use. Between 10,000 ft and 15,000 ft (4,572 m), brain function is mildly impaired and hypoxic symptoms are common, although both are often difficult to accurately quantify, which may partly be due to the effects of hypocapnia. Above 15,000 ft, brain function exponentially deteriorates with increasing altitude until loss of consciousness. The period of effective and safe performance of operational tasks following exposure to hypoxia is termed the time-of-useful-consciousness (TUC). Recovery of brain function following hypoxia may also lag beyond arterial reoxygenation and could be exacerbated by repeated hypoxic exposures or hyperoxic recovery. This review provides an overview of the basic physiology and implications of hypoxia for military aviation and discusses the utility of hypoxia recognition training.