1
|
Ciocca N, Lu H, Tzimas G, Muller O, Masi A, Maurizi N, Skalidis I, Gissler MC, Monney P, Schwitter J, Ge Y, Antiochos P. Head-to-Head Comparison and Temporal Trends of Cardiac MRI Recommendations in ESC versus ACC/AHA Guidelines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging 2024; 6:e230271. [PMID: 38842455 PMCID: PMC11211940 DOI: 10.1148/ryct.230271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
Purpose To provide a comprehensive head-to-head comparison and temporal analysis of cardiac MRI indications between the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines to identify areas of consensus and divergence. Materials and Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. ESC and ACC/AHA guidelines published until May 2023 were systematically screened for recommendations related to cardiac MRI. The class of recommendation (COR) and level of evidence (LOE) for cardiac MRI recommendations were compared between the two guidelines and between newer versus older versions of each guideline using χ2 or Fisher exact tests. Results ESC guidelines included 109 recommendations regarding cardiac MRI, and ACC/AHA guidelines included 90 recommendations. The proportion of COR I and LOE B was higher in ACC/AHA versus ESC guidelines (60% [54 of 90] vs 46.8% [51 of 109]; P = .06 and 53% [48 of 90] vs 35.8% [39 of 109], respectively; P = .01). The increase in the number of cardiac MRI recommendations over time was significantly higher in ESC guidelines (from 63 to 109 for ESC vs from 65 to 90 for ACC/AHA; P = .03). The main areas of consensus were found in heart failure and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, while the main divergences were in valvular heart disease, arrhythmias, and aortic disease. Conclusion ESC guidelines included more recommendations related to cardiac MRI use, whereas the ACC/AHA recommendations had higher COR and LOE. The number of cardiac MRI recommendations increased significantly over time in both guidelines, indicating the increasing role of cardiac MRI evaluation and management of cardiovascular disease. Keywords: Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Guideline, European Society of Cardiology, ESC, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, ACC/AHA Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Ciocca
- From the Division of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital and
University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland (N.C., H.L.,
G.T., O.M., A.M., N.M., I.S., P.M., J.S., P.A.); Division of Cardiovascular
Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston,
Mass (H.L.); Department of Cardiology, University of Crete, Herakleion, Greece
(I.S.); Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center
Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg,
Germany (M.C.G.); and Division of Cardiology, St Michael’s Hospital,
University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (Y.G.)
| | - Henri Lu
- From the Division of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital and
University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland (N.C., H.L.,
G.T., O.M., A.M., N.M., I.S., P.M., J.S., P.A.); Division of Cardiovascular
Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston,
Mass (H.L.); Department of Cardiology, University of Crete, Herakleion, Greece
(I.S.); Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center
Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg,
Germany (M.C.G.); and Division of Cardiology, St Michael’s Hospital,
University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (Y.G.)
| | - Georgios Tzimas
- From the Division of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital and
University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland (N.C., H.L.,
G.T., O.M., A.M., N.M., I.S., P.M., J.S., P.A.); Division of Cardiovascular
Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston,
Mass (H.L.); Department of Cardiology, University of Crete, Herakleion, Greece
(I.S.); Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center
Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg,
Germany (M.C.G.); and Division of Cardiology, St Michael’s Hospital,
University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (Y.G.)
| | - Olivier Muller
- From the Division of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital and
University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland (N.C., H.L.,
G.T., O.M., A.M., N.M., I.S., P.M., J.S., P.A.); Division of Cardiovascular
Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston,
Mass (H.L.); Department of Cardiology, University of Crete, Herakleion, Greece
(I.S.); Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center
Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg,
Germany (M.C.G.); and Division of Cardiology, St Michael’s Hospital,
University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (Y.G.)
| | - Ambra Masi
- From the Division of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital and
University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland (N.C., H.L.,
G.T., O.M., A.M., N.M., I.S., P.M., J.S., P.A.); Division of Cardiovascular
Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston,
Mass (H.L.); Department of Cardiology, University of Crete, Herakleion, Greece
(I.S.); Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center
Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg,
Germany (M.C.G.); and Division of Cardiology, St Michael’s Hospital,
University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (Y.G.)
| | - Niccolò Maurizi
- From the Division of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital and
University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland (N.C., H.L.,
G.T., O.M., A.M., N.M., I.S., P.M., J.S., P.A.); Division of Cardiovascular
Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston,
Mass (H.L.); Department of Cardiology, University of Crete, Herakleion, Greece
(I.S.); Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center
Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg,
Germany (M.C.G.); and Division of Cardiology, St Michael’s Hospital,
University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (Y.G.)
| | - Ioannis Skalidis
- From the Division of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital and
University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland (N.C., H.L.,
G.T., O.M., A.M., N.M., I.S., P.M., J.S., P.A.); Division of Cardiovascular
Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston,
Mass (H.L.); Department of Cardiology, University of Crete, Herakleion, Greece
(I.S.); Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center
Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg,
Germany (M.C.G.); and Division of Cardiology, St Michael’s Hospital,
University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (Y.G.)
| | - Mark Colin Gissler
- From the Division of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital and
University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland (N.C., H.L.,
G.T., O.M., A.M., N.M., I.S., P.M., J.S., P.A.); Division of Cardiovascular
Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston,
Mass (H.L.); Department of Cardiology, University of Crete, Herakleion, Greece
(I.S.); Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center
Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg,
Germany (M.C.G.); and Division of Cardiology, St Michael’s Hospital,
University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (Y.G.)
| | - Pierre Monney
- From the Division of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital and
University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland (N.C., H.L.,
G.T., O.M., A.M., N.M., I.S., P.M., J.S., P.A.); Division of Cardiovascular
Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston,
Mass (H.L.); Department of Cardiology, University of Crete, Herakleion, Greece
(I.S.); Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center
Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg,
Germany (M.C.G.); and Division of Cardiology, St Michael’s Hospital,
University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (Y.G.)
| | - Juerg Schwitter
- From the Division of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital and
University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland (N.C., H.L.,
G.T., O.M., A.M., N.M., I.S., P.M., J.S., P.A.); Division of Cardiovascular
Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston,
Mass (H.L.); Department of Cardiology, University of Crete, Herakleion, Greece
(I.S.); Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center
Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg,
Germany (M.C.G.); and Division of Cardiology, St Michael’s Hospital,
University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (Y.G.)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Westwood M, Almeida AG, Barbato E, Delgado V, Dellegrottaglie S, Fox KF, Gargani L, Huber K, Maurovich-Horvat P, Merino JL, Mindham R, Muraru D, Neubeck L, Nijveldt R, Papadakis M, Pontone G, Price S, Rosano GMC, Rossi A, Sade LE, Schulz-Menger J, Weidinger F, Achenbach S, Petersen SE. Competency-based cardiac imaging for patient-centred care. A statement of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). With the contribution of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), and the support of the Association of Cardiovascular Nursing & Allied Professions (ACNAP), the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC), the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC), the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), and the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 2023; 44:4771-4780. [PMID: 37622660 PMCID: PMC10691193 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Imaging plays an integral role in all aspects of managing heart disease and cardiac imaging is a core competency of cardiologists. The adequate delivery of cardiac imaging services requires expertise in both imaging methodology-with specific adaptations to imaging of the heart-as well as intricate knowledge of heart disease. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging have developed and implemented a successful education and certification programme for all cardiac imaging modalities. This programme equips cardiologists to provide high quality competency-based cardiac imaging services ensuring they are adequately trained and competent in the entire process of cardiac imaging, from the clinical indication via selecting the best imaging test to answer the clinical question, to image acquisition, analysis, interpretation, storage, repository, and results dissemination. This statement emphasizes the need for competency-based cardiac imaging delivery which is key to optimal, effective and efficient, patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Westwood
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London,Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, United Kingdom
- Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, United Kingdom
| | - Ana G Almeida
- Heart and Vessels Department, University Hospital Santa Maria, Faculty of Medicine of Lisbon University, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Emanuele Barbato
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Victoria Delgado
- Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Cardiology, Hospital University Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
- Centre de Medicina Comparativa i Bioimatge (CMCIB), Badalona, Spain
| | | | - Kevin F Fox
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Luna Gargani
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Kurt Huber
- 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinic Ottakring (Wilhelminenhospital), Vienna, Austria
- Medical School, Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pál Maurovich-Horvat
- Department of Radiology, Medical Imaging Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Jose L Merino
- Cardiology Department, La Paz University Hospital, Universidad Autonoma, IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Denisa Muraru
- Department of Cardiology, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Lis Neubeck
- School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Robin Nijveldt
- Cardiology Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Papadakis
- Cardiovascular Clinical Academic Group, St. George’s, University of London, London, United Kingdom
- St. George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gianluca Pontone
- Department of Perioperative Cardiology and Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Susanna Price
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
- Cardiology and Critical Care, Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals, Part of GSTT NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alexia Rossi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Leyla Elif Sade
- Cardiology Department, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Heart and Vascular Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jeanette Schulz-Menger
- Cardiology, WG CMR, Outpatient Research Department, Charite, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Cardiology Department, Helios Clinics berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Franz Weidinger
- 2nd Department of Medicine with Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine Vienna Healthcare Group Clinic Landstraße, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stephan Achenbach
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Steffen E Petersen
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London,Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, United Kingdom
- Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fanaroff AC, Lopes RD. Standing up for equitable treatment of coronary microvascular dysfunction and myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries. Eur J Intern Med 2023; 117:52-54. [PMID: 37758566 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2023.09.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander C Fanaroff
- Penn Cardiovascular Outcomes, Quality and Evaluative Research Center, Leonard Davis Institute, and Cardiovascular Medicine Division, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Renato D Lopes
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Westwood M, Almeida AG, Barbato E, Delgado V, Dellegrottaglie S, Fox KF, Gargani L, Huber K, Maurovich-Horvat P, Merino JL, Mindham R, Muraru D, Neubeck L, Nijveldt R, Papadakis M, Pontone G, Price S, Rosano GMC, Rossi A, Sade LE, Schulz-Menger J, Weidinger F, Achenbach S, Petersen SE. Competency-based cardiac imaging for patient-centred care. A statement of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). With the contribution of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), and the support of the Association of Cardiovascular Nursing & Allied Professions (ACNAP), the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC), the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC), the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), and the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2023; 24:1415-1424. [PMID: 37622662 PMCID: PMC10610731 DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jead216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Imaging plays an integral role in all aspects of managing heart disease and cardiac imaging is a core competency of cardiologists. The adequate delivery of cardiac imaging services requires expertise in both imaging methodology-with specific adaptations to imaging of the heart-as well as intricate knowledge of heart disease. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging have developed and implemented a successful education and certification programme for all cardiac imaging modalities. This programme equips cardiologists to provide high quality competency-based cardiac imaging services ensuring they are adequately trained and competent in the entire process of cardiac imaging, from the clinical indication via selecting the best imaging test to answer the clinical question, to image acquisition, analysis, interpretation, storage, repository, and results dissemination. This statement emphasizes the need for competency-based cardiac imaging delivery which is key to optimal, effective and efficient, patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Westwood
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, United Kingdom
- Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, United Kingdom
| | - Ana G Almeida
- Heart and Vessels Department, University Hospital Santa Maria, Faculty of Medicine of Lisbon University, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Emanuele Barbato
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Victoria Delgado
- Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Cardiology, Hospital University Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
- Centre de Medicina Comparativa i Bioimatge (CMCIB), Badalona, Spain
| | | | - Kevin F Fox
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Luna Gargani
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Kurt Huber
- 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinic Ottakring (Wilhelminenhospital), Vienna, Austria
- Medical School, Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pál Maurovich-Horvat
- Department of Radiology, Medical Imaging Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Jose L Merino
- Cardiology Department, La Paz University Hospital, Universidad Autonoma, IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Denisa Muraru
- Department of Cardiology, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Lis Neubeck
- School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Robin Nijveldt
- Cardiology Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Papadakis
- Cardiovascular Clinical Academic Group, St. George’s, University of London, London, United Kingdom
- St. George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gianluca Pontone
- Department of Perioperative Cardiology and Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Susanna Price
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
- Cardiology and Critical Care, Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals, Part of GSTT NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alexia Rossi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Leyla Elif Sade
- Cardiology Department, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Heart and Vascular Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jeanette Schulz-Menger
- Cardiology, WG CMR, Outpatient Research Department, Charite, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Cardiology Department, Helios Clinics berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Franz Weidinger
- 2nd Department of Medicine with Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine Vienna Healthcare Group Clinic Landstraße, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stephan Achenbach
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Steffen E Petersen
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, United Kingdom
- Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sierra-Galan LM, Estrada-Lopez EES, Ferrari VA, Raman SV, Ferreira VM, Raj V, Joseph E, Schulz-Menger J, Chan CWS, Chen SSM, Cheng Y, De Lara Fernandez J, Terashima M, Albert TSE. Worldwide variation in cardiovascular magnetic resonance practice models. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2023; 25:38. [PMID: 37394485 PMCID: PMC10316597 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-023-00948-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) for diagnosis and management of a broad range of cardiac and vascular conditions has quickly expanded worldwide. It is essential to understand how CMR is utilized in different regions around the world and the potential practice differences between high-volume and low-volume centers. METHODS CMR practitioners and developers from around the world were electronically surveyed by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) twice, requesting data from 2017. Both surveys were carefully merged, and the data were curated professionally by a data expert using cross-references in key questions and the specific media access control IP address. According to the United Nations classification, responses were analyzed by region and country and interpreted in the context of practice volumes and demography. RESULTS From 70 countries and regions, 1092 individual responses were included. CMR was performed more often in academic (695/1014, 69%) and hospital settings (522/606, 86%), with adult cardiologists being the primary referring providers (680/818, 83%). Evaluation of cardiomyopathy was the top indication in high-volume and low-volume centers (p = 0.06). High-volume centers were significantly more likely to list evaluation of ischemic heart disease (e.g., stress CMR) as a primary indicator compared to low-volume centers (p < 0.001), while viability assessment was more commonly listed as a primary referral reason in low-volume centers (p = 0.001). Both developed and developing countries noted cost and competing technologies as top barriers to CMR growth. Access to scanners was listed as the most common barrier in developed countries (30% of responders), while lack of training (22% of responders) was the most common barrier in developing countries. CONCLUSION This is the most extensive global assessment of CMR practice to date and provides insights from different regions worldwide. We identified CMR as heavily hospital-based, with referral volumes driven primarily by adult cardiology. Indications for CMR utilization varied by center volume. Efforts to improve the adoption and utilization of CMR should include growth beyond the traditional academic, hospital-based location and an emphasis on cardiomyopathy and viability assessment in community centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Victor A Ferrari
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania and Penn Cardiovascular Institute, Cardiovascular Division, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Subha V Raman
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Vanessa M Ferreira
- Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Vimaj Raj
- Narayana Hrudayalaya Institute of Cardiac Sciences, Hosur Road, Bangalore, India
| | | | - Jeanette Schulz-Menger
- Charité, University Medicine Berlin, ECRC, Helios-Clinics, DZHK-Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Yuchen Cheng
- West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Leshan, Sichuan, China
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Echocardiographic changes and impact on clinical management in pregnant women with heart disease. Cardiol Young 2023; 33:449-456. [PMID: 35726562 DOI: 10.1017/s1047951122001135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While guidelines recommend echocardiography for pregnant women with heart disease, there are limited data on its effect on clinical practice. In this study, we investigated pregnancy-associated echocardiographic changes and their impact on management. METHODS This was a retrospective study of pregnant women with heart disease followed at an academic medical centre from 2016 to 2020. Data on maternal intrapartum and postpartum echocardiograms were collected and the impact on management analysed. RESULTS 421 echocardiograms in 232 pregnancies were included in the study. The most common cardiac diagnosis was CHD (60.8% of pregnancies), followed by cardiomyopathy (9.9%). The frequency of baseline echocardiographic abnormalities varied by diagnosis, with abnormal right ventricular systolic pressure being the most common (15.0% of pregnancies in CHD and 23.1% of pregnancies with cardiomyopathy). 39.2% of the 189 follow-up echocardiograms had a significant change from the prior study, with the most common changes being declines in right ventricular function (4.2%) or left ventricular function (3.7%), and increases in right ventricular systolic pressure (5.3%) and aortic size (21.2%). 17.8% of echocardiograms resulted in a clinical management change, with the most common change being shorter interval follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Echocardiographic changes in pregnant women with heart disease are common, in particular increases in aortic size. Echocardiography results in changes in management in a small but significant proportion of patients. Further studies are needed to determine how other factors, including patient access and resource allocation, factor into the use of echocardiography during pregnancy.
Collapse
|
7
|
Heidenreich PA. Can We Attribute Outcome Improvements to Improved Cardiac Imaging? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2023; 16:672-674. [PMID: 36881427 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.12.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Paul A Heidenreich
- Department of Medicine, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, California, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ruberg FL, Baggish AL, Hays AG, Jerosch-Herold M, Kim J, Ordovas KG, Reddy G, Shenoy C, Weinsaft JW, Woodard PK. Utilization of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Resumption of Athletic Activities Following COVID-19 Infection: An Expert Consensus Document on Behalf of the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Leadership and Endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2023; 16:e014106. [PMID: 36541203 PMCID: PMC9848221 DOI: 10.1161/circimaging.122.014106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The global pandemic of COVID-19 caused by infection with SARS-CoV-2 is now entering its fourth year with little evidence of abatement. As of December 2022, the World Health Organization Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard reported 643 million cumulative confirmed cases of COVID-19 worldwide and 98 million in the United States alone as the country with the highest number of cases. Although pneumonia with lung injury has been the manifestation of COVID-19 principally responsible for morbidity and mortality, myocardial inflammation and systolic dysfunction though uncommon are well-recognized features that also associate with adverse prognosis. Given the broad swath of the population infected with COVID-19, the large number of affected professional, collegiate, and amateur athletes raises concern regarding the safe resumption of athletic activity (return to play) following resolution of infection. A variety of different testing combinations that leverage ECG, echocardiography, circulating cardiac biomarkers, and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging have been proposed and implemented to mitigate risk. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in particular affords high sensitivity for myocarditis but has been employed and interpreted nonuniformly in the context of COVID-19 thereby raising uncertainty as to the generalizability and clinical relevance of findings with respect to return to play. This consensus document synthesizes available evidence to contextualize the appropriate utilization of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the return to play assessment of athletes with prior COVID-19 infection to facilitate informed, evidence-based decisions, while identifying knowledge gaps that merit further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederick L. Ruberg
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine/Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA (F.L.R.)
| | - Aaron L. Baggish
- Cardiac Performance Program, Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (A.L.B.)
| | - Allison G. Hays
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (A.G.H.)
| | - Michael Jerosch-Herold
- Cardiovascular Imaging Section, Harvard Medical School/Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA (M.J.-H.)
| | - Jiwon Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY (J.K., J.W.W.)
| | - Karen G. Ordovas
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA (K.G.O., G.R.)
| | - Gautham Reddy
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA (K.G.O., G.R.)
| | - Chetan Shenoy
- Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN (C.S.)
| | - Jonathan W. Weinsaft
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY (J.K., J.W.W.)
| | - Pamela K. Woodard
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO (P.K.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Weberling LD, Lossnitzer D, Frey N, André F. Coronary Computed Tomography vs. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 13:diagnostics13010125. [PMID: 36611417 PMCID: PMC9818886 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13010125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Coronary artery disease (CAD) represents a widespread burden to both individual and public health, steadily rising across the globe. The current guidelines recommend non-invasive anatomical or functional testing prior to invasive procedures. Both coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) and stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) are appropriate imaging modalities, which are increasingly used in these patients. Both exhibit excellent safety profiles and high diagnostic accuracy. In the last decade, cCTA image quality has improved, radiation exposure has decreased and functional information such as CT-derived fractional flow reserve or perfusion can complement anatomic evaluation. CMR has become more robust and faster, and advances have been made in functional assessment and tissue characterization allowing for earlier and better risk stratification. This review compares both imaging modalities regarding their strengths and weaknesses in the assessment of CAD and aims to give physicians rationales to select the most appropriate modality for individual patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas D. Weberling
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-6221-8676
| | - Dirk Lossnitzer
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Norbert Frey
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian André
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ruberg FL, Baggish AL, Hays AG, Jerosch-Herold M, Kim J, Ordovas KG, Reddy G, Shenoy C, Weinsaft JW, Woodard PK. Utilization of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging for resumption of athletic activities following COVID-19 infection: an expert consensus document on behalf of the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention (CVRI) Leadership and endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2022; 24:73. [PMID: 36539786 PMCID: PMC9767806 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-022-00907-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by infection with severe acute respiratory suyndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is now entering its 4th year with little evidence of abatement. As of December 2022, the World Health Organization Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard reported 643 million cumulative confirmed cases of COVID-19 worldwide and 98 million in the United States alone as the country with the highest number of cases. While pneumonia with lung injury has been the manifestation of COVID-19 principally responsible for morbidity and mortality, myocardial inflammation and systolic dysfunction though uncommon are well-recognized features that also associate with adverse prognosis. Given the broad swath of the population infected with COVID-19, the large number of affected professional, collegiate, and amateur athletes raises concern regarding the safe resumption of athletic activity (return to play, RTP) following resolution of infection. A variety of different testing combinations that leverage the electrocardiogram, echocardiography, circulating cardiac biomarkers, and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging have been proposed and implemented to mitigate risk. CMR in particular affords high sensitivity for myocarditis but has been employed and interpreted non-uniformly in the context of COVID-19 thereby raising uncertainty as to the generalizability and clinical relevance of findings with respect to RTP. This consensus document synthesizes available evidence to contextualize the appropriate utilization of CMR in the RTP assessment of athletes with prior COVID-19 infection to facilitate informed, evidence-based decisions, while identifying knowledge gaps that merit further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederick L Ruberg
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine/Boston Medical Center, Boston University, 72 E Concord St, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
| | - Aaron L Baggish
- Cardiac Performance Program, Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Allison G Hays
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael Jerosch-Herold
- Cardiovascular Imaging Section, Harvard Medical School/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jiwon Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karen G Ordovas
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Gautham Reddy
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Chetan Shenoy
- Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Jonathan W Weinsaft
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pamela K Woodard
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
The Merits, Limitations, and Future Directions of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Cardiac MRI with a Focus on Coronary Artery Disease: A Literature Review. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 2022; 9:jcdd9100357. [PMID: 36286309 PMCID: PMC9604922 DOI: 10.3390/jcdd9100357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has a wide range of clinical applications with a high degree of accuracy for many myocardial pathologies. Recent literature has shown great utility of CMR in diagnosing many diseases, often changing the course of treatment. Despite this, it is often underutilized possibly due to perceived costs, limiting patient factors and comfort, and longer examination periods compared to other imaging modalities. In this regard, we conducted a literature review using keywords “Cost-Effectiveness” and “Cardiac MRI” and selected articles from the PubMed MEDLINE database that met our inclusion and exclusion criteria to examine the cost-effectiveness of CMR. Our search result yielded 17 articles included in our review. We found that CMR can be cost-effective in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) in select patient populations with various cardiac pathologies. Specifically, the use of CMR in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with a pretest probability below a certain threshold may be more cost-effective compared to patients with a higher pretest probability, although its use can be limited based on geographic location, professional society guidelines, and differing reimbursement patterns. In addition, a stepwise combination of different imaging modalities, with conjunction of AHA/ACC guidelines can further enhance the cost-effectiveness of CMR.
Collapse
|
12
|
Reeves RA, Halpern EJ, Rao VM. Cardiac Imaging Trends from 2010 to 2019 in the Medicare Population. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging 2021; 3:e210156. [PMID: 34778785 DOI: 10.1148/ryct.2021210156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Revised: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate changes in utilization of cardiac imaging-transthoracic, transesophageal, and stress echocardiography (TTE, TEE, and SE), coronary CT angiography (cCTA), cardiac MRI (cMRI), myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), and cardiac positron emission tomography (cPET). Materials and Methods The 2010-2019 Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary files were used to find imaging utilization per 100 000 Medicare beneficiaries. Global and professional claims were aggregated, representing total interpretive services. Specialty codes identified provider specialty. Results were stratified by physician offices, hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs), inpatient setting, and the emergency department. Results From 2010 to 2019, there was a partial shift from cardiologist offices to the HOPD for TTE (office: -23%; HOPD: +107%) and SE (office: -44%; HOPD: +11%). Cardiologist cCTA also shifted from the office (-57%) to the HOPD (+211%). Radiologist-performed cCTA grew in all locations but most in the HOPD (+355%), with radiologists performing more cCTA than cardiologists in all settings. cMRI rates remain low but rose in the HOPD for both cardiologists (+209%) and radiologists (+207%). Cardiologist MPI rates dropped dramatically in the office (-52%), with a smaller absolute rate increase in the HOPD (+71%). cPET nearly tripled in the cardiology office (+193%), but rates remained steady for radiologists. Conclusion While most cardiologist in-office imaging has shifted to the HOPD, there has been an increase in in-office cPET, likely due to a combination of technological advances, interpretation familiarity, and financial incentives. Radiologist cCTA rates continue to increase, representing a growing opportunity for radiologists to collaborate in cardiac imaging.Keywords: CT Angiography, Echocardiography, MR Imaging, PET, Radionuclide Studies, SPECT, Cardiac, Work Force Issues Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russell A Reeves
- Department of Radiology, Center for Research on Utilization of Imaging Service (CRUISE), Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 S 10th St, Suite 1087, Main Bldg, Philadelphia, PA 19147
| | - Ethan J Halpern
- Department of Radiology, Center for Research on Utilization of Imaging Service (CRUISE), Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 S 10th St, Suite 1087, Main Bldg, Philadelphia, PA 19147
| | - Vijay M Rao
- Department of Radiology, Center for Research on Utilization of Imaging Service (CRUISE), Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 S 10th St, Suite 1087, Main Bldg, Philadelphia, PA 19147
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Anfinogenova ND, Trubacheva IA, Popov SV, Efimova EV, Ussov WY. Trends and concerns of potentially inappropriate medication use in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2021; 20:1191-1206. [PMID: 33970732 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1928632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: The use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) is an alarming social risk factor in cardiovascular patients. PIM administration may result in iatrogenic disorders and adverse consequences may be attenuated by limiting PIM intake.Areas covered: The goal of this review article is to discuss the trends, risks, and concerns regarding PIM administration with focus on cardiovascular patients. To find data, we searched literature using electronic databases (Pubmed/Medline 1966-2021 and Web of Science 1975-2021). The data search terms were cardiovascular diseases, potentially inappropriate medication, potentially harmful drug-drug combination, potentially harmful drug-disease combination, drug interaction, deprescribing, and electronic health record.Expert opinion: Drugs for heart diseases are the most commonly prescribed medications in older individuals. Despite the availability of explicit and implicit PIM criteria, the incidence of PIM use in cardiovascular patients remains high ranging from 7 to 85% in different patient categories. Physician-induced disorders often occur when PIM is administered and adverse effects may be reduced by limiting PIM intake. Main strategies promising for addressing PIM use include deprescribing, implementation of systematic electronic records, pharmacist medication review, and collaboration among cardiologists, internists, geriatricians, clinical pharmacologists, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals as basis of multidisciplinary assessment teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina D Anfinogenova
- Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation
| | - Irina A Trubacheva
- Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation
| | - Sergey V Popov
- Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation
| | - Elena V Efimova
- Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation
| | - Wladimir Y Ussov
- Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation
| |
Collapse
|