A Meta-Analysis of Growth Differentiation Factor-15 and Prognosis in Chronic Heart Failure

Associations Between Biomarkers of Myocardial Injury and Systemic Inflammation and Risk of Incident Ventricular Arrhythmia

BACKGROUND

Cardiac troponins (cTns) and biomarkers of inflammation are elevated in heart failure (HF) and predict cardiovascular risk. Whether these biomarkers associate with risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess whether cTnT, growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations are associated with incident VA.

METHODS

In a prospective, observational study of patients treated with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, cTnT, GDF-15, IL-6, and CRP were measured at baseline and after 1.4 ± 0.5 years and were associated with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator-detected incident VA, HF hospitalizations, and mortality.

RESULTS

This study included 489 patients aged 66 ± 12 years and 83% were men. Median concentrations of cTnT were 15 (Q1-Q3: 9-25) ng/L at inclusion, and higher concentrations were associated with higher age, male sex, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, and HF. During 3.1 ± 0.7 years of follow-up, 137 patients (28%) had ≥1 VA. cTnT concentrations were associated with an increased VA risk (per log-unit, HR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.31-2.01; P < 0.001), also after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, coronary artery disease, HF, renal function, and left ventricular ejection fraction (P < 0.001). GDF-15, IL-6, and CRP concentrations were not associated with incident VA, but all (including cTnT) were associated with HF hospitalization and mortality. Changes in cTnT, GDF-15, IL-6, and CRP from baseline to 1.4 years were not associated with subsequent VA.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher concentrations of cTnT, GDF-15, IL-6, and CRP associate with HF hospitalization and death, but only cTnT predict incident VA. These findings suggest that myocardial injury rather than inflammation may play a pathophysiological role in VA and sudden cardiac death.

Association between growth differentiation factor-15 and adverse outcomes among patients with heart failure: A systematic literature review

Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) is an emerging biomarker in several conditions. This SLR, conducted following PRISMA guidelines, examined the association between GDF-15 concentration and range of adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). Publications were identified from Embase® and Medline® bibliographic databases between January 1, 2014, and August 23, 2022 (congress abstracts: January 1, 2020, to August 23, 2022). Sixty-three publications met the eligibility criteria (55 manuscripts and 8 abstracts; 45 observational studies and 18 post hoc analyses of randomized controlled trials [RCTs]). Of the 19 outcomes identified, the most frequently reported longitudinal outcomes were mortality (n = 32 studies; all-cause [n = 27] or cardiovascular-related [n = 6]), composite outcomes (n = 28; most commonly mortality ± hospitalization/rehospitalization [n = 19]), and hospitalization/re-hospitalization (n = 11). The most common cross-sectional outcome was renal function (n = 22). Among longitudinal studies assessing independent relationships with outcomes using multivariate analyses (MVA), a significant increase in risk associated with higher baseline GDF-15 concentration was found in 22/24 (92 %) studies assessing all-cause mortality, 4/5 (80 %) assessing cardiovascular-related mortality, 13/19 (68 %) assessing composite outcomes, and 4/8 (50 %) assessing hospitalization/rehospitalization. All (7/7; 100 %) of the cross-sectional studies assessing the relationship with renal function by MVA, and 3/4 (75 %) assessing exercise capacity, found poorer outcomes associated with higher baseline GDF-15 concentrations. This SLR suggests GDF-15 is an independent predictor of mortality and other adverse but nonfatal outcomes in patients with HF. A better understanding of the prognostic role of GDF-15 in HF could improve clinical risk prediction models and potentially help optimize treatment regimens.

Biomarkers in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Perpetually Evolving Frontier

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represents a complex clinical syndrome, often very difficult to diagnose using the available tools. As the global burden of this disease is constantly growing, surpassing the prevalence of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, during the last few years, efforts have focused on optimizing the diagnostic and prognostic pathways using an immense panel of circulating biomarkers. After the paradigm of HFpEF development emerged more than 10 years ago, suggesting the impact of multiple comorbidities on myocardial structure and function, several phenotypes of HFpEF have been characterized, with an attempt to find an ideal biomarker for each distinct pathophysiological pathway. Acknowledging the limitations of natriuretic peptides, hundreds of potential biomarkers have been evaluated, some of them demonstrating encouraging results. Among these, soluble suppression of tumorigenesis-2 reflecting myocardial remodeling, growth differentiation factor 15 as a marker of inflammation and albuminuria as a result of kidney dysfunction or, more recently, several circulating microRNAs have proved their incremental value. As the number of emerging biomarkers in HFpEF is rapidly expanding, in this review, we aim to explore the most promising available biomarkers linked to key pathophysiological mechanisms in HFpEF, outlining their utility for diagnosis, risk stratification and population screening, as well as their limitations.

The Role of Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Parameters in Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) remains a major medical and social problem. The NT-pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and its active form, brain-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), in a simple blood test are the gold-standard biomarkers for HF diagnosis. However, even good biomarkers such as natriuretic peptides fail to predict all the risks associated with HF due to the diversity of the mechanisms involved. The pathophysiology of HF is determined by numerous factors, including oxidative stress, inflammation, neuroendocrine activation, pathological angiogenesis, changes in apoptotic pathways, fibrosis and vascular remodeling. High readmission and mortality rates prompt a search for new markers for the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of HF. Oxidative-stress-mediated inflammation plays a crucial role in the development of subsequent changes in the failing heart and provides a new insight into this complex mechanism. Oxidative stress and inflammatory biomarkers appear to be a promising diagnostic and prognostic tool in patients with HF. This systematic review provides an overview of the current knowledge about oxidative stress and inflammation parameters as markers of HF.

Growth differentiation factor-15 serum concentrations reflect disease severity and anemia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Population of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is burdened by various extraintestinal manifestations which substantially contribute to greater morbidity and mortality. Growth-differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) is often over-expressed under stress conditions, such as inflammation, malignancies, heart failure, myocardial ischemia, and many others.

AIM

To explore the association between GDF-15 and IBD as serum concentrations of GDF-15 were shown to be an independent predictor of poor outcomes in multiple diseases. An additional aim was to determine possible associations between GDF-15 and multiple clinical, anthropometric and laboratory parameters in patients with IBD.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 90 adult patients diagnosed with IBD, encompassing both Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), and 67 healthy age- and sex-matched controls. All patients underwent an extensive workup, including colonoscopy with subsequent histopathological analysis. Disease activity was assessed by two independent gastroenterology consultants specialized in IBD, employing well-established clinical and endoscopic scoring systems. GDF-15 serum concentrations were determined following an overnight fasting, using electrochemiluminescence immunoassay.

RESULTS

In patients with IBD, serum GDF-15 concentrations were significantly higher in comparison to the healthy controls [800 (512-1154) pg/mL vs 412 (407-424) pg/mL, P < 0.001], whereas no difference in GDF-15 was found between patients with CD and UC [807 (554-1451) pg/mL vs 790 (509-956) pg/mL, P = 0.324]. Moreover, multiple linear regression analysis showed that GDF-15 levels predict CD and UC severity independent of age, sex, and C-reactive protein levels (P = 0.016 and P = 0.049, respectively). Finally, an association between GDF-15 and indices of anemia was established. Specifically, negative correlations were found between GDF-15 and serum iron levels (r = -0.248, P = 0.021), as well as GDF-15 and hemoglobin (r = -0.351, P = 0.021). Accordingly, in comparison to IBD patients with normal hemoglobin levels, GDF-15 serum levels were higher in patients with anemia (1256 (502-2100) pg/mL vs 444 (412-795) pg/mL, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

For the first time, we demonstrated that serum concentrations of GDF-15 are elevated in patients with IBD in comparison to healthy controls, and the results imply that GDF-15 might be involved in IBD pathophysiology. Yet, it remains elusive whether GDF-15 could serve as a prognostic indicator in these patients.

GDF-15: a novel biomarker of heart failure predicts short-term and long-term heart-failure rehospitalization and short-term mortality in patients with acute heart failure syndrome

BACKGROUND

Acute heart failure (AHF) is a potentially life-threatening clinical syndrome, usually requiring hospital admission. Growth Differentiation Factor-15 (GDF-15) is a distant member of the transforming growth factor-β. The increased expression of GDF-15 has been observed during heart failure (HF) and is associated with worse outcomes. However, the relationship between GDF-15 and AHF is not well understood with limited evidence among Thai patients.

PURPOSE

Investigate the correlation between biomarker levels (measured upon admission and discharge) and short- and long-term adverse outcomes, encompassing all-cause mortality and heart-failure (HF) rehospitalization (at 30, 90, and 180 days, as well as throughout the entire follow-up duration) in individuals experiencing acute HF.

METHODS

This is a prospective single-center investigation involving patients admitted for AHF. Biomarkers, including GDF-15, high-sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT), and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), were assessed upon admission and discharge. Outcomes, including all-cause mortality and HF rehospitalization, were examined. Logarithmic transformations were applied to the biomarker variables for subsequent analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses of cause-specific hazards were conducted using the Cox proportional hazards regression model, while subdistribution hazards were assessed using the Fine-Gray regression model to evaluate outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients were enrolled (mean age of 69 years, 52% females). The GDF-15 level significantly decreased during admission (median at the time of admission 6,346 pg/mL, median at the time of discharge 5,711 pg/mL; p < 0.01). All-cause mortality at 30 days and 180 days were 6.0% and 16.7%, respectively. HF rehospitalization at 30 days and 180 days were 15.5% and 28.6%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that total orthoedema congestion score (p = 0.02) and admission GDF-15 level (p = 0.01) were associated with 30-day all-cause mortality, whereas hsTnT or NT-proBNP levels did not show significant associations. However, higher levels of NT-proBNP upon admission were associated with all-cause mortality when considering the entire follow-up period (p < 0.01). Both univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that lower discharge GDF-15 levels and a greater reduction in GDF-15 levels from admission to discharge were associated with a lower risk of 30-day rehospitalization. Similarly, univariate analysis revealed that a greater reduction in NT-proBNP levels from admission to discharge was associated with lower 30-day rehospitalization rates. At 180 days, a greater reduction in GDF-15 levels remained associated with lower hazards and incidence of rehospitalization.

CONCLUSION

The significant decrease in Growth Differentiation Factor-15 (GDF-15) levels during hospitalization suggests its potential as a dynamic marker reflecting the course of AHF. Importantly, higher GDF-15 levels at admission were associated with an increased risk of 30-day all-cause mortality, highlighting its prognostic value in this patient population. Moreover, lower discharge GDF-15 levels, reductions in GDF-15 from admission to discharge, and decreases in NT-proBNP from admission to discharge were associated with a reduced risk of 30-day rehospitalization.

Novel Biomarkers in Early Detection of Heart Failure: A Narrative Review

Heart failure (HF) represents a significant global health challenge, characterized by a variety of symptoms resulting from cardiac dysfunction. This dysfunction often leads to systemic and pulmonary congestion. The pathophysiology of HF is complex, involving stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system, which is insufficiently balanced by the release of natriuretic peptide. This imbalance leads to progressive hypertrophy and dilatation of the heart's chambers, impairing its pumping efficiency and increasing the risk of arrhythmias and conduction disorders. The prevalence of HF is exceptionally high in industrialized nations and is expected to increase owing to an aging population and advancements in diagnostic methods. This study emphasizes the critical role of early diagnosis in reducing morbidity and mortality associated with HF, focusing specifically on the evolving importance of biomarkers in managing this condition. Biomarkers have played a key role in transforming the diagnosis and treatment of HF. Traditional biomarkers such as b-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro-b-type natriuretic peptide have been widely adopted for their cost-effectiveness and ease of access. However, the rise of novel biomarkers such as growth differentiation factor 15 and adrenomedullin has shown promising results, offering superior sensitivity and specificity. These new biomarkers enhance diagnostic accuracy, risk stratification, and prognostic evaluation in HF patients. Despite these advancements, challenges remain, such as limited availability, high costs, and the need for further validation in diverse patient populations. Through a comprehensive literature review across databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library, this study compiles and analyzes data from 18 relevant studies, offering a detailed understanding of the current state of HF biomarkers. The study examines both traditional and emerging biomarkers such as galectin-3 and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 in HF, exploring their clinical roles and impact on patient outcomes.

Growth differentiation factor-15 in patients with or at risk of heart failure but before first hospitalisation

OBJECTIVE

Identification of patients at risk of adverse outcome from heart failure (HF) at an early stage is a priority. Growth differentiation factor (GDF)-15 has emerged as a potentially useful biomarker. This study sought to identify determinants of circulating GDF-15 and evaluate its prognostic value, in patients at risk of HF or with HF but before first hospitalisation.

METHODS

Prospective, longitudinal cohort study of 2166 consecutive patients in stage A-C HF undergoing cardiovascular magnetic resonance and measurement of GDF-15. Multivariable linear regression investigated determinants of GDF-15. Cox proportional hazards modelling, Net Reclassification Improvement and decision curve analysis examined its incremental prognostic value. Primary outcome was a composite of first hospitalisation for HF or all-cause mortality. Median follow-up was 1093 (939-1231) days.

RESULTS

Major determinants of GDF-15 were age, diabetes and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, although despite extensive phenotyping, only around half of the variability of GDF-15 could be explained (R2 0.51). Log-transformed GDF-15 was the strongest predictor of outcome (HR 2.12, 95% CI 1.71 to 2.63) and resulted in a risk prediction model with higher predictive accuracy (continuous Net Reclassification Improvement 0.26; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.39) and with greater clinical net benefit across the entire range of threshold probabilities.

CONCLUSION

In patients at risk of HF, or with HF but before first hospitalisation, GDF-15 provides unique information and is highly predictive of hospitalisation for HF or all-cause mortality, leading to more accurate risk stratification that can improve clinical decision making.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02326324.

Predictive Value of GDF-15 and sST2 for Pulmonary Hypertension in Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Objective

To confirm whether growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) are indicators of pulmonary hypertension in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD-PH).

Methods

All patients admitted to the hospital with AECOPD between July 2020 and October 2021 were enrolled. The patients were then categorized into AECOPD and AECOPD-PH groups according to PH probability, and the differences in GDF-15 and sST2 serum levels in the AECOPD and AECOPD-PH groups were compared. Correlation analysis was carried out to explore the association between GDF-15 and sST2 serum levels and the length of hospital stay of patients with AECOPD-PH. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to assess the clinical significance of GDF-15 and sST2 in predicting patients with AECOPD-PH.

Results

Included in this study were 126 patients with AECOPD, including 69 with AECOPD and 57 with AECOPD-PH. The serum levels of GDF-15 and sST2 in the AECOPD-PH group were significantly higher than those in the AECOPD group (P < 0.05). There was no significant correlation between the length of hospital stay in AECOPD-PH patients and GDF-15 and sST2 serum levels (P > 0.05). The area under the curves of GDF-15, sST2, and GDF-15 + sST2 for predicting AECOPD-PH and AECOPD-PH patients with poor prognosis were >0.60 and 0.70, respectively. The optimal cutoff values of GDF-15 and sST2 for predicting AECOPD-PH were 1125.33 pg/mL and 80.68 ng/mL and 1309.72 pg/mL and 59.10 ng/mL for predicting AECOPD-PH patients with poor prognosis, respectively.

Conclusion

GDF-15 and sST2 levels may be useful in the prediction of AECOPD-PH.

Growth Differentiation Factor 15 (GDF-15), a New Biomarker in Heart Failure Management

The emergence of biomarkers across medicine's subspecialties continues to evolve. In essence, a biomarker is a biological observation that clearly substitutes a clinical endpoint or intermediate outcome not only are more difficult to observe but also, biomarkers are easier, less expensive and could be measured over shorter periods. In general, biomarkers are versatile and not only used for disease screening and diagnosis but, most importantly, for disease characterization, monitoring, and determination of prognosis as well as individualized therapeutic responses. Obviously, heart failure (HF) is no exception to the use of biomarkers. Currently, natriuretic peptides are the most used biomarkers for both diagnosis and prognostication, while their role in the monitoring of treatment is still debatable. Although several other new biomarkers are currently under investigation regarding diagnosis and determination of prognosis, none of them are specific for HF, and none are recommended for routine clinical use at present. However, among these emerging biomarkers, we would like to highlight the potential for growth differentiation factor (GDF)-15 as a plausible new biomarker that could be helpful in providing prognostic information regarding HF morbidity and mortality.

Incremental prognostic value of biomarkers in PARADIGM-HF

AIMS

It is uncertain how much candidate biomarkers improve risk prediction when added to comprehensive models including routinely collected clinical and laboratory variables in heart failure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Aldosterone, cystatin C, high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT), galectin-3, growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), kidney injury molecule-1, matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9, soluble suppression of tumourigenicity-2, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) and urinary albumin to creatinine ratio were measured in 1559 of PARADIGM-HF participants. We tested whether these biomarkers, individually or collectively, improved the performance of the PREDICT-HF prognostic model, which includes clinical, routine laboratory, and natriuretic peptide data, for the primary endpoint and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. The mean age of participants was 67.3 ± 9.9 years, 1254 (80.4%) were men and 1103 (71%) were in New York Heart Association class II. During a mean follow-up of 30.7 months, 300 patients experienced the primary outcome and 197 died. Added individually, only four biomarkers were independently associated with all outcomes: hs-TnT, GDF-15, cystatin C and TIMP-1. When all biomarkers were added simultaneously to the PREDICT-HF models, only hs-TnT remained an independent predictor of all three endpoints. GDF-15 also remained predictive of the primary endpoint; TIMP-1 was the only other predictor of both cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Individually or in combination, these biomarkers did not lead to significant improvements in discrimination or reclassification.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the biomarkers studied individually or collectively led to a meaningful improvement in the prediction of outcomes over what is provided by clinical, routine laboratory, and natriuretic peptide variables.

Circulating GDF-15 in relation to the progression and prognosis of chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) typically exhibit circulating growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) at high levels. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the potential value of GDF-15 in predicting CKD progression and prognosis. Furthermore, when sufficient information was provided, the dose-response correlation was studied.

METHODS

Studies were searched in Web of Science, Embase, and PubMed from inception until November 2022. By using random- or fixed-effects models, the pooled effect size was estimated in accordance with heterogeneity in existing research.

RESULTS

This study covered 14 studies from 12 articles with 7813 subjects participating in the research. CKD patients in the top GDF-15 tertile had notably higher risks of CKD progression (HR 2.60, 95% CI 2.06-3.27), all-cause mortality (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.44-2.92), cardiovascular mortality (HR 2.82, 95% CI 1.85-4.30), and cardiovascular events (HR 2.74, 95% CI 2.21-3.40), as compared to CKD patients in the bottom tertile. In the dose-response study, the risks for CKD progression, all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and cardiovascular events were increased by 31% (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.06-1.61), 44% (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.08-1.92), 67% (HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.37-2.03), and 55% (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.31-1.83), respectively, with per 1 ng/mL increase in GDF-15. The positive linear correlations between GDF-15 and CKD progression and prognosis in a certain GDF-15 concentration range of approximately 0-3 ng/mL were indicated by the dose-response curve.

CONCLUSIONS

Circulating GDF-15 independently predicted CKD progression and worse prognosis; however, the predicted correlations may fall into a specific range of GDF-15 concentrations.

The role of serial cardiac biomarkers in prognostication and risk prediction of chronic heart failure: additional scientific insights with hemodynamic feedback

INTRODUCTION

Heart failure (HF) is considered as a chronic long-term and lethal disease and will continue to be a major public health problem. Studying (circulating) biomarkers is a promising field of research and could be the first step toward HF tailored prognostic strategies as well as understanding the response to HF drugs in CHF patients.

AREAS COVERED

In literature, there has been considerable research on elevated biomarker levels that are related to a poor prognosis for HF. Since biomarker levels change over time, it is important to study serial (repeated) biomarker measurements which may help us better understand the dynamic course of HF illness. However, the majority of research focuses predominantly on baseline values of biomarkers. Additionally, remote monitoring devices, like sensors, can be used to link hemodynamic information to freshen biomarker data in order to further ameliorate the management of HF.

EXPERT OPINION

Novel biomarkers and additional scientific insights with hemodynamic feedback strongly aid in the prognostication and risk prediction of chronic HF.

Bad players in AL amyloidosis in the current era of treatment

INTRODUCTION

Systemic AL amyloidosis (ALA) is a clonal plasma cell (PC) disease characterized by deposition of amyloid fibrils in different organs and tissues. Traditionally, the prognosis of ALA is poor and is primarily defined by cardiac involvement. The modern prognostic models are based on cardiac markers and free light chain difference (dFLC). Cardiac biomarkers have low specificity and are dependent on renal function, volume status, and cardiac diseases other than ALA. New therapies significantly improved the prognosis of the disease. The advancements in technologies - cardiac echocardiography (ECHO) and cardiac MRI (CMR), as well as new biological markers, relying on cardiac injury, inflammation, endothelial damage, and clonal and non-clonal PC markers are promising.

AREAS COVERED

An update on the prognostic significance of cardiac ALA, number of involved organs, response to treatment, including minimal residual disease (MRD), ECHO, MRI, and new biological markers will be discussed. The literature search was done in PubMed and Google Scholar, and the most recent and relevant data are included.

EXPERT OPINION

Prospective multicenter trials, evaluating multiple clinical and laboratory parameters, should be done to improve the risk assessment models in ALA in the modern era of therapy.

GDF-15 and soluble ST2 as biomarkers of right ventricular dysfunction in pulmonary hypertension

Background: This study analyzed the utility of soluble ST2 (sST2) and GDF-15 as biomarkers of right ventricular (RV) function in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). Methods: GDF-15 and sST2 serum concentrations were measured in patients with PH (n = 628), dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 31) and left ventricular hypertrophy (n = 47), and in healthy controls (n = 61). Results: Median sST2 and GDF-15 levels in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy were higher than in patients with PH and dilated cardiomyopathy. In tertile analysis GDF-15 >1363 pg/ml and sST2 >38 ng/ml were associated with higher N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, RV systolic dysfunction, RV-pulmonary arterial uncoupling and hemodynamic impairment. Conclusion: GDF-15 and sST2 are potential biomarkers of RV dysfunction in patients with PH.

A Rising Star of the Multimarker Panel: Growth Differentiation Factor-15 Levels Are an Independent Predictor of Mortality in Acute Heart Failure Patients Admitted to an Emergency Clinical Hospital from Eastern Europe

(1) Background: Acute heart failure (HF) represents one of the most common yet extremely severe presentations in emergency services worldwide, requiring prompt diagnosis, followed by an adequate therapeutic approach, and a thorough risk stratification. Natriuretic peptides (NPs) are currently the most widely implemented biomarkers in acute HF, but due to their lack of specificity, they are mainly used as ruling-out criteria. Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) is a novel molecule expressing different pathophysiological pathways in HF, such as fibrosis, remodeling, and oxidative stress. It is also considered a very promising predictor of mortality and poor outcome. In this study, we aimed to investigate the GDF-15’s expression and particularities in patients with acute HF, focusing mainly on its role as a prognosis biomarker, either per se or as part of a multimarker panel. (2) Methods: This unicentric prospective study included a total of 173 subjects, divided into 2 subgroups: 120 patients presented in emergency with acute HF, while 53 were ambulatory-evaluated controls with chronic HF. At admission, all patients were evaluated according to standard clinical echocardiography and laboratory panel, including the assessment of GDF-15. (3) Results: The levels of GDF-15 were significantly higher in patients with acute HF, compared to controls [596 (305−904) vs. 216 (139−305) ng/L, p < 0.01]. GDF-15 also exhibited an adequate diagnostic performance in acute HF, expressed as an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.883 [confidence interval (CI) 95%: 0.828−0.938], similar to that of NT-proBNP (AUC: 0.976, CI 95%: 0.952−1.000), or troponin (AUC: 0.839, CI 95%: 0.733−0.944). High concentrations of GDF-15 were significantly correlated with mortality risk. In a multivariate regression model, GDF-15 was the most important predictor of a poor outcome, superior to NT-proBNP or troponin. (4) Conclusions: GDF-15 proved to be a reliable tool in the multimarker assessment of patients with acute HF. Compared to the gold standard NT-proBNP, GDF-15 presented a similar diagnostic performance, doubled by a significantly superior prognostic value, making it worth being included in a standardized multimarker panel.

Increased serum concentrations of growth differentiation factor-15 in children with acute rheumatic fever

AIM

In this single-centre prospective study, we aimed to evaluate the role of growth differentiation factor-15 in children with acute rheumatic fever.

METHODS

The study group included 25 children with acute rheumatic fever, and the control group included 25 healthy children. In addition to routine laboratory tests used in the diagnosis and treatment of acute rheumatic fever, growth differentiation factor-15 levels of the study group (at the time of diagnosis and after the treatment) and the control group were assessed and compared.

RESULTS

The mean growth differentiation factor-15 level of the study group at the time of diagnosis (918.40 ± 605.65 pg/ml) was significantly higher than the mean post-treatment level (653.08 ± 330.92 pg/ml) (p = 0.015). Similarly, the mean growth differentiation factor-15 level of the study group at the time of diagnosis was significantly higher than the control group (p = 0.04). However, mean growth differentiation factor-15 levels were similar between the groups after the treatment. Growth differentiation factor-15 was positively correlated with both C-reactive protein (p < 0.001) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p = 0.001) at the time of diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Growth differentiation factor-15 levels are significantly increased in children with acute rheumatic fever at the time of diagnosis and return to similar levels with healthy children after treatment. Growth differentiation factor-15 is positively and significantly correlated with erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein at the time of diagnosis.

Neutralization of GDF15 Prevents Anorexia and Weight Loss in the Monocrotaline-Induced Cardiac Cachexia Rat Model

Growth and differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) is a cytokine reported to cause anorexia and weight loss in animal models. Neutralization of GDF15 was efficacious in mitigating cachexia and improving survival in cachectic tumor models. Interestingly, elevated circulating GDF15 was reported in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and heart failure, but it is unclear whether GDF15 contributes to cachexia in these disease conditions. In this study, rats treated with monocrotaline (MCT) manifested a progressive decrease in body weight, food intake, and lean and fat mass concomitant with elevated circulating GDF15, as well as development of right-ventricular dysfunction. Cotreatment of GDF15 antibody mAb2 with MCT prevented MCT-induced anorexia and weight loss, as well as preserved lean and fat mass. These results indicate that elevated GDF15 by MCT is causal to anorexia and weight loss. GDF15 mAb2 is efficacious in mitigating MCT-induced cachexia in vivo. Furthermore, the results suggest GDF15 inhibition is a potential therapeutic approach to alleviate cardiac cachexia in patients.

Biomarkers Associated with Cardiovascular Disease in COVID-19

Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) emerged late December 2019 in the city of Wuhan, China and has since spread rapidly all over the world causing a global pandemic. While the respiratory system is the primary target of disease manifestation, COVID-19 has been shown to also affect several other organs, making it a rather complex, multi-system disease. As such, cardiovascular involvement has been a topic of discussion since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, primarily due to early reports of excessive myocardial injury in these patients. Treating physicians are faced with multiple challenges in the management and early triage of patients with COVID-19, as disease severity is highly variable ranging from an asymptomatic infection to critical cases rapidly deteriorating to intensive care treatment or even fatality. Laboratory biomarkers provide important prognostic information which can guide decision making in the emergency department, especially in patients with atypical presentations. Several cardiac biomarkers, most notably high-sensitive cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), have emerged as valuable predictors of prognosis in patients with COVID-19. The purpose of this review was to offer a concise summary on prognostic cardiac biomarkers in COVID-19 and discuss whether routine measurements of these biomarkers are warranted upon hospital admission.