Efficacy and Safety of Colchicine in Post-acute Myocardial Infarction Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Empagliflozin and colchicine in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction following ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a study protocol for a randomized, double-blinded, three-arm parallel-group, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with acute myocardial infarction are at greater risk for chronic heart failure and mortality. Currently, there is limited evidence supporting the beneficial effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on cardiovascular outcomes in non-diabetic patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction following acute myocardial infarction. Furthermore, the clinical effects of the combination of standard-dose sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors with colchicine and high-dose sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in this setting have not been evaluated yet.

METHODS

A prospective, double-blinded, parallel-group, placebo control randomized trial will be carried out at Shahid Madani Heart Center, the largest teaching referral hospital for cardiovascular diseases, affiliated with Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. A total of 105 patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (≤ 40%) following the first episode of ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with stent insertion will be randomized 1:1:1 to receive empagliflozin 10 mg daily, a combination of empagliflozin 10 mg daily and colchicine 0.5 mg twice daily, or empagliflozin 25 mg daily for 12 weeks. The primary outcomes are changes in the New York Heart Association functional classification and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein from the randomization through week 4 and week 12.

DISCUSSION

The present study will be the first trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of early treatment with the combination of standard-dose empagliflozin and colchicine as well as high-dose empagliflozin in non-diabetic patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction following ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The results of this research will represent a significant step forward in the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trial ID: IRCT20111206008307N39. Registration date: 27 October 2022.

Early long-term low-dosage colchicine and major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Current evidence on the efficacy and safety of colchicine after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains controversial. This study aims to clarify early low-dose long-term colchicine's exact efficacy and safety in AMI patients via more studies.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of colchicine on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in recent AMI patients from inception to January 29, 2023, without any restriction. Additionally, we conducted subgroup analyses to assess the impact of early (≤3 days) long-term (≥1 year) low-dosage (0.5 mg/d) colchicine. Summary estimates were computed using Mantel-Haenszel and reported as risk ratios (RRs) or standard mean differences (SMDs), mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity. Review Manager software was used for the meta-analysis.

Results

Eight studies identified from 564 screened records were analyzed, with 5,872 patients after AMI. The length of follow-up varied from five days to 22.7 months, and 0.5-1.0 mg colchicine was administered daily. In summary, compared to the control group, colchicine reduced the occurrence of MACE (RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.48-0.67) with 2.99-fold gastrointestinal adverse events in patients with recent AMI. Moreover, the relation referred to a gradual decrease in the occurrence of MACE with a longer follow-up duration (≥1 year) and lower dosage (0.5 mg/d) without leading more gastrointestinal adverse events. Colchicine decreased the follow-up levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) (MD -0.66, 95% CI, -0.98- -0.35) and neutrophils (SMD -0.22, 95% CI, -0.39- -0.55) when the follow-up period was 30 days.

Conclusion

Early long-term low-dose colchicine decreases the risk of MACE via anti-inflammation without leading more gastrointestinal adverse events in patients with AMI.

The Role of Colchicine in Different Clinical Phenotypes of Behcet Disease

PURPOSE

Behcet disease (BD) is a multisystemic disorder characterized by variable clinical manifestations that affect nearly all systems and organs. Colchicine, an alkaloid plant extract, is considered as the first-line therapy for gout, pericarditis, and familial Mediterranean fever. However, the role of colchicine in the treatment of different clinical phenotypes of BD has not been clearly described. This narrative review summarizes the clinical use of colchicine in BD.

METHODS

All relevant literature from 1980 to March 2021 was searched in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library. The Medical Subject Heading terms and related words that were searched are as follows: Behcet's disease, Behcet's syndrome, BD, colchicine, management, treatment, and therapy.

FINDINGS

BD is an autoimmune systemic vasculitis with various clinical phenotypes, with involvement of skin mucosa, joints, eyes, and gastrointestinal, vascular, and neurologic systems. Colchicine has been used for centuries, acts by binding to tubulin to prevent the mitotic process, and has anti-inflammatory, antitumor, and antifibrotic properties. Colchicine has been reported to be an effective option for the treatment of skin, mucosal, and joint involvement in patients with certain BD clinical phenotypes.

IMPLICATIONS

Colchicine reduces the severity of certain clinical phenotypes and may improve the overall disease activity index in patients with BD. More randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm the value of colchicine in the treatment of BD, and further elucidation of the mechanisms is also needed, which may reveal new application of colchicine that has been used for centuries.

Efficacy of Liraglutide in Non-Diabetic Obese Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Objective: We systematically assessed the efficacy of liraglutide in non-diabetic obese adults. Methods: Six databases were searched up to July 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing liraglutide versus placebo in obese adults. Primary outcomes were body weight and body mass index (BMI). Secondary outcomes were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), hypoglycemic episodes, HbA1c, and blood pressure. Effect measures were risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with their confidence interval (95%CI). Random-effects models and inverse variance meta-analyses were used. Quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Results: Twelve RCTs (n = 8249) were included. In comparison to placebo, liraglutide reduced body weight (MD −3.35 kg; 95%CI −4.65 to −2.05; p < 0.0001), and BMI (MD −1.45 kg/m2; 95%CI −1.98 to −0.91; p < 0.0001). Liraglutide did not reduce TEAEs (RR 1.08; 95%CI 0.92 to 1.27; p = 0.25), and Hb1Ac (MD −0.76%; 95%CI −2.24 to 0.72; p = 0.31). Furthermore, it did not increase hypoglycemic episodes (RR 2.01; 95%CI 0.37 to 11.02; p = 0.28). Finally, liraglutide reduced systolic blood pressure (MD −3.07 mmHg; 95%CI −3.66 to −2.48; p < 0.0001) and diastolic blood pressure (MD −1.01 mmHg; 95%CI −1.55 to −0.47; p = 0.0003). Seven RCTs had a high risk of bias. Subgroup analyses by length of treatment and doses had effects similar to the overall analyses. Quality of evidence was low or very low for most outcomes. Conclusions: In non-diabetic obese adults, liraglutide reduced body weight, BMI and blood pressure in comparison to placebo. Adverse events, Hb1Ac levels and hypoglycemic episodes were not different than placebo.

The naturally-derived alkaloids as a potential treatment for COVID-19: A scoping review

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), which has a high mortality rate and transmissibility. In this context, medicinal plants have attracted attention due to the wide availability and variety of therapeutic compounds, such as alkaloids, a vast class with several proven pharmacological effects, like the antiviral and anti‐inflammatory activities. Therefore, this scoping review aimed to summarize the current knowledge of the potential applicability of alkaloids for treating COVID‐19. A systematic search was performed on PubMed and Scopus, from database inception to August 2021. Among the 63 eligible studies, 65.07% were in silico model, 20.63% in vitro and 14.28% clinical trials and observational studies. According to the in silico assessments, the alkaloids 10‐hydroxyusambarensine, cryptospirolepine, crambescidin 826, deoxynortryptoquivaline, ergotamine, michellamine B, nigellidine, norboldine and quinadoline B showed higher binding energy with more than two target proteins. The remaining studies showed potential use of berberine, cephaeline, emetine, homoharringtonine, lycorine, narciclasine, quinine, papaverine and colchicine. The possible ability of alkaloids to inhibit protein targets and to reduce inflammatory markers show the potential for development of new treatment strategies against COVID‐19. However, more high quality analyses/reviews in this field are necessary to firmly establish the effectiveness/safety of the alkaloids here described.

Colchicine - new horizons for an ancient drug. Review based on the highest hierarchy of evidence

Colchicine is an old, inexpensive, and relatively safe anti-inflammatory drug traditionally used in gout and over the last 50 years in familial Mediterranean fever. A search of all high-hierarchy studies (randomized controlled trials [RCTs], systematic reviews and meta-analysis of RCTs) over the last 20 years revealed myriad other evidence-based applications. Colchicine seems efficacious in the treatment of acute pericarditis and prevention of recurrences and in the prevention of postcardiac injury syndrome and atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery or percutaneous interventions. In patients already fully treated with statins and antiplatelet agents following acute coronary syndromes or stable coronary disease, adding low-dose colchicine achieved secondary prevention of major cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death) with pooled risk reduction 0.75. Colchicine may also be useful in Behcet's syndrome and most recently, in improving outcomes of COVID-19 infection. Colchicine in the low doses used in most trials (≤ 1 mg/d) was generally safe and well-tolerated, excepting diarrhea (approximately 10%) which sometimes led to drug discontinuation. Further RCTs are required to confirm these results, and will likely lead to expanding indications for low-dose colchicine. Increasing numbers of patients will be treated with colchicine in the near future, with improved health outcomes, as long as basic caveats are heeded.