Mothers and Babies Online Course: Participant Characteristics and Behaviors in a Web-Based Prevention of Postpartum Depression Intervention

Racial Disparity of Mental Health Service Utilization Among Low-Income Head Start Eligible Parents

Based on the Head Start Impact Study, 1706 parents who had mild, moderate, and severe depressive symptoms were selected to examine the following questions: (1) Are there racial disparities in mental health service utilization among low-income parents? (2) Does Head Start have an impact on mental health service utilization across white, African American, and Hispanic parents? The present research found that, compared to white parents, African American and Hispanic parents are significantly less likely to utilize mental health services. Head Start impact was found for white parents but not for African American and Hispanic parents. Furthermore, parents who spoke a language other than English had higher household risk factors, and reside in rural areas are less likely to utilize mental health services. Mental health providers should deliver patient-centered services that consider cultural and linguistic competency as well as the personal life context of their patients to remove any barriers to accessing mental health services.

Acceptability and Utility of a Digital Group Intervention to Prevent Perinatal Depression in Youths via Interactive Maternal Group for Information and Emotional Support (IMAGINE): Pilot Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Perinatal depression (depression during pregnancy or the first year postpartum) affects 10%-25% of perinatal individuals, with a higher risk among youths aged <25 years. The Mothers and Babies Course (MB) is an evidence-based intervention for the prevention of perinatal depression, grounded in cognitive behavioral therapy, attachment theory, and psychoeducation.

OBJECTIVE

We developed a digital adaptation of MB (Interactive Maternal Group for Information and Emotional Support [IMAGINE]) and evaluated it in a pre-post mixed methods pilot among young perinatal people in the United States.

METHODS

IMAGINE was a structured digital group of up to 7 participants, with scheduled MB content and open discussion for 12 weeks, facilitated by a social worker. Scheduled content included asynchronous SMS text messages, graphics, prerecorded videos, mood polls, and optional weekly synchronous video calls. Eligible participants were pregnant or ≤80 days postpartum, aged 16 to 24 years, had access to a smartphone, spoke English, and had a Patient Health Questionnaire score <10. Participants were recruited throughout the United States from August 2020 to January 2021 through paid social media ads, in-person outreach at clinics, and respondent-driven sampling. Participants completed quantitative questionnaires at enrollment and 3 months, and qualitative interviews at 3 months. We determined uptake, acceptability (by Acceptability of Intervention Measure score), and utility (by use of cognitive behavioral therapy skills). We compared depression symptoms (by Patient Health Questionnaire score), social support (by abbreviated Social Support Behavior score), and perceived stress (by Perceived Stress Score) between enrollment and follow-up by paired 2-tailed t test.

RESULTS

Among 68 individuals who contacted this study, 22 were screened, 13 were eligible, and 10 enrolled, for an uptake of 76.9%. Furthermore, 4 (40%) participants were pregnant at enrollment. Participants had a median age of 17.9 (IQR 17.4-21.7) years, 6 (67%) identified as Black, 5 (56%) Latinx, and 6 (67%) using Medicaid health insurance. Further, 9 (90%) participants completed follow-up. Among these, the mean acceptability score was 4.3 out of 5 (SD 0.6) and all participants said they would recommend IMAGINE to a friend. Participants reported using a median of 7 of 11 skills (IQR 5-7 skills) at least half the days. We found no significant changes in depression symptoms, perceived stress, or social support. Qualitatively, participants reported one-to-one support from the facilitator, connection with other parents, and regular mood reflection were especially helpful aspects of the intervention. Additionally, participants reported that the intervention normalized their mental health challenges, improved their ability to manage their mood, and increased their openness to mental health care.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study provides promising evidence of the acceptability and utility of IMAGINE among perinatal youths. Our study's small sample size did not detect changes in clinical outcomes; our findings suggest IMAGINE warrants larger-scale evaluation.

Feasibility and acceptability of an online mental health intervention for pregnant women and their partners: a mixed method study with a pilot randomized control trial

BACKGROUND

Untreated perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMAD) have short- and long-term health and social consequences; online cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) interventions can reduce symptoms. Despite partner support being protective online interventions rarely target couples. This study builds on research on an existing CBT-based intervention, the Mothers and Babies Online Course (eMB), by testing its feasibility with prenatal couples.

METHODS

We conducted a pilot, randomized, controlled feasibility trial using a 1:1 parallel design. To be eligible, participant dyads were pregnant people (between 13-30 weeks gestation and with a score of 10 or greater on either the GAD-7 or PHQ-9 scale indicating elevated symptoms of anxiety or depression) and their cohabitating partners, living in Missouri, with access to the internet; both in the dyad consented to participate. Recruitment occurred via Facebook ads, flyers, and a snowball approach. The intervention group received eMB, and the control group received a list of community resources. We examined retention and adherence data extracted from eMB analytics and study databases. All participants were given depression and anxiety scales at baseline, 4 and 8 weeks to test preliminary efficacy; satisfaction and acceptability were measured at trial end (i.e., eight weeks) and via interview.

RESULTS

There were 441 people who responded to recruitment materials, 74 pregnant people were screened; 19 partners did not complete enrolment, and 25 dyads were ineligible. There were 15 dyads per group (N = 30) who enrolled; all completed the study. The survey response rate was 90% but partners required nearly twice the number of reminders. No participant completed all lessons. Mean depression and anxiety scores dropped over time for dyads in control (M = -1.99, -1.53) and intervention (M = -4.80, -1.99). Intervention pregnant people's anxiety significantly decreased (M = -4.05; 95% CI [0.82, 7.27]) at time two compared to control. Twelve pregnant people and four partners participated in post-intervention interviews and suggested improvements for eMB.

CONCLUSION

Online dyadic interventions can potentially reduce PMAD symptoms. However, to feasibly study eMB with couples, strategies to increase program adherence are necessary. Tailoring interventions to overtly include partners may be advantageous.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05867680, 19/05/2023.