Case Report: Combination of Omalizumab and Dupilumab for Recalcitrant Bullous Pemphigoid

Pathophysiology of Bullous Pemphigoid: Role of Type 2 Inflammation and Emerging Treatment Strategies (Narrative Review)

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune blistering disease that most often affects elderly individuals and has a significant negative impact on quality of life. The disease is characterized primarily by autoantibodies to hemidesmosomal proteins BP180 and/or BP230, and an inflammatory reaction with notable features of type 2 inflammation, including elevated serum IgE, increased numbers of eosinophils in lesions and peripheral blood, and elevated expression of type 2 cytokines and chemokines in skin lesions. In this review, we present what is known about BP pathophysiology, including the role of type 2 inflammation, and discuss how findings from studies of biologics targeting type 2 immune mediators have helped to clarify the biological mechanisms driving BP pathophysiology. Future studies of these targeted therapies and others in development will help to further elucidate the mechanisms underlying BP pathophysiology and potentially provide better treatment options for patients.

Omalizumab and Dupilumab for the Treatment of Bullous Pemphigoid: A Systematic Review

Background: Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the appearance of very pruritic subepidermal blisters. It appears mostly in the elderly and is associated with multiple comorbidities, which makes its management and treatment difficult. The purpose of this systematic review is to compile current information on published cases of BP treated with omalizumab (omalizumab) and dupilumab (dupilumab) in order to obtain information on clinical efficacy and safety data available. Methods: A literature search of all cases of BP treated with omalizumab/dupilumab published in the literature up to January 2024 was performed using the Pubmed database. After an exhaustive search, a total of 61 studies encompassing 886 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Results: The majority of patients with BP treated with omalizumab/dupilumab presented a significant improvement in symptomatology, being very safe drugs with minimal side effects. The main limitation of the presented review is the quality of the included studies, most of them being case series or individual cases. The development of studies with a higher level of scientific evidence in the near future would be of great interest. Conclusions: Both omalizumab and dupilumab appear to be effective options for treating BP in patients refractory to other pharmacological therapies. They are drugs with a good safety profile and the adverse reactions associated with their use are infrequent and generally mild.

Study Design of a Phase 2/3 Randomized Controlled Trial of Dupilumab in Adults with Bullous Pemphigoid: LIBERTY-BP ADEPT

BACKGROUND

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a rare, autoimmune, blistering skin disease associated with high disease burden, profoundly decreased quality of life and increased morbidity. Emerging evidence supports an important role for type 2 inflammation in disease pathogenesis. Current management relies on topical and/or systemic corticosteroids, non-selective immunosuppressants and antibiotics with anti-inflammatory properties, which are all limited by side effects and toxicities. Therefore, targeted, efficacious and safe therapies are needed. Dupilumab blocks the shared receptor component for interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13, key and central drivers of type 2 inflammation. Several reports of patients successfully treated with dupilumab have been published; however, dupilumab has not been formally assessed in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES

We report the design of LIBERTY-BP ADEPT, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in adults with BP.

METHODS

LIBERTY-BP ADEPT comprises a 35-day screening, 52-week treatment and 12-week follow-up period. Approximately 98 adults aged 18-90 years with moderate-to-severe BP are being enrolled at 51 sites on 4 continents and randomized 1:1 to subcutaneous dupilumab or placebo every 2 weeks. All participants will receive concomitant oral corticosteroids (OCS).

PLANNED OUTCOMES

The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving complete remission off steroid therapy at week 36. Key secondary endpoints include total cumulative OCS dose to week 36, percent change and proportion of patients with ≥ 4-point reduction in the weekly average of daily Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale from baseline to week 36 and percent change in Bullous Pemphigoid Area Index score from baseline to week 36.

CONCLUSION

The trial results will provide evidence on whether the efficacy and safety of dupilumab support its use as a potential novel treatment approach for BP and will provide new insights into the role of type 2 inflammation in BP pathogenesis.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04206553.

Advancements in Bullous Pemphigoid Treatment: A Comprehensive Pipeline Update

ABASTRACT

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a common autoimmune bullous disease affecting mainly the elderly, with rising incidence due to increased life expectancy. This disease is characterized by tense bullous lesions on normal or erythematous skin, accompanied by pruritus. BP pathogenesis involves autoantibodies against hemidesmosomal proteins BP180 and BP230, leading to detachment at the dermo-epidermal junction as well as blister formation. BP is associated with coexisting comorbidities and drug exposure, and its management often requires high doses or chronic use of systemic glucocorticoids, posing risks of adverse effects. This review focuses on novel treatment options for BP, exploring therapies targeting different immune pathways. Rituximab, a CD20 monoclonal antibody, depletes B-lymphocytes and has shown efficacy in severe cases. Dupilumab, targeting interleukin (IL)-4 receptor α and thus blocking IL-4 and IL-13, downregulates type 2 helper (Th2) responses and has demonstrated promising results. Targeting eosinophil-related molecules using bertilimumab and AKST4290 has yielded positive results in clinical trials. Omalizumab, an immunoglobulin (Ig) E antibody, can reduce disease severity and allows corticosteroid tapering in a number of cases. Complement inhibitors such as nomacopan and avdoralimab are being investigated. IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors such as secukinumab and tildrakizumab have shown potential in a limited number of case reports. Neonatal Fc receptor antagonists such as efgartigimod are under investigation. Additionally, topical therapies and Janus kinase inhibitors are being explored as potential treatments for BP. These novel therapies offer promising alternatives for managing BP, with potential to improve outcomes and reduce high cumulative doses of systemic corticosteroids and related toxicities. Further research, including controlled clinical trials, is needed to establish their efficacy, safety, and optimal dosing regimens for BP management.

Advancing Treatment in Bullous Pemphigoid: A Comprehensive Review of Novel Therapeutic Targets and Approaches

Bullous pemphigoid is one of the most common autoimmune bullous diseases occurring primarily in the elderly. Pathogenic autoantibodies against BP180 and BP230 at the dermal-epidermal junction cause subepidermal blisters, erosions, and intense pruritus, all of which adversely affect the patients' quality of life and may increase their morbidity and mortality. Current systemic treatment options for bullous pemphigoid are limited to corticosteroids and immunosuppressants, which can have substantial side effects on these vulnerable patients that even exceed their therapeutic benefits. Therefore, more precisely, targeting therapies to the pathogenic cells and molecules in bullous pemphigoid is an urgent issue. In this review, we describe the pathophysiology of bullous pemphigoid, focusing on autoantibodies, complements, eosinophils, neutrophils, proteases, and the T helper 2 and 17 axes since they are crucial in promoting proinflammatory environments. We also highlight the emerging therapeutic targets for bullous pemphigoid and their latest discoveries in clinical trials or experimental studies. Further well-designed studies are required to establish the efficacy and safety of these prospective therapeutic options.

Review of Dual Biologics in Specialty Pharmacy Practice

OBJECTIVE

To describe and review the published evidence on use of multiple biologics within specialty pharmacy practice.

DATA SOURCES

A search of PubMed and Embase was conducted from October 2021 through September 2022. Keywords included biologics for immune-mediated conditions along with the terms "dual," "add-on," and "combination."

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All human studies in the English language were considered. Published abstracts, case reports, case series, randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Although evidence is limited, there are published meta-analyses of combined biologic use within gastroenterology and rheumatology. There are also numerous case reports within dermatology. Clinical trials of dual biologics for severe rheumatologic conditions and inflammatory bowel disease are in progress. Existing evidence for use in pulmonology and allergy suggest dual biologic therapy can be safe and effective, but data are limited. Literature describing use of monoclonal antibodies for other overlapping conditions is lacking.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

This article reviews the evidence describing combination biologic use and outlines remaining knowledge gaps. It also describes the essential role that specialty pharmacists play in managing therapeutic mAbs.

CONCLUSIONS

High-quality evidence describing combination biologic use is limited and long-term safety data are lacking. Pharmacists should utilize their specialized training to assess appropriateness of therapy, provide patient counseling and monitor for safety and efficacy.

Evaluation of Dupilumab in Patients With Bullous Pemphigoid

Importance

Dupilumab is a theoretically novel therapy for bullous pemphigoid (BP). However, its effectiveness and safety have yet to be confirmed in a large-scale study.

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in patients with BP and evaluate factors that potentially affect short-term and long-term outcomes.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2021, to July 31, 2022. The median (IQR) follow-up period was 24.6 (11.5-38.4) weeks. This multicenter study was performed in 6 dermatology departments of the National Autoimmune Bullous Diseases Cooperative Group of China. Adult patients with BP that received 300 mg of dupilumab every 2 weeks following an initial dose of 600 mg were included. Patients were eligible if they had a clinical presentation of BP combined with immunological or pathological evidence. Patients with drug-induced BP, with less than 4 weeks of follow-up, and who received dupilumab or any other biologics within 6 months were excluded.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved disease control within 4 weeks. Disease control was defined as the absence of new lesions and pruritus, combined with the healing of existing lesions. Complete remission rates, relapse rates, changes in Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (BPDAI) scores, itching numerical rating scale (NRS) scores, laboratory results within 64 weeks, and adverse events (AEs) were also assessed.

Results

Among 146 patients (median [IQR] age, 73 [64-85] years; 86 [58.9%] male patients) included in the study, 127 (87.0%) patients achieved disease control within 4 weeks, with a median (IQR) time of 14 (7-14) days. A total of 52 (35.6%) patients achieved complete remission, and 13 (8.9%) patients relapsed during the observation period. The complete remission rate and cumulative relapse rate at week 64 were 62.5% (5 of 8) and 30.9%, respectively. There was rapid and sustained improvement in clinical indicators and laboratory examination results after dupilumab treatment, including BPDAI scores, itching NRS scores, serum anti-BP180 and anti-BP230 antibodies, total IgE levels, and eosinophil count. Of these 146 patients, 107 (73.3%) did not report any AEs. The most common AEs were infections and eosinophilia. Serum anti-BP180 antibody levels of greater than 50 relative units (RU)/mL (OR, 3.63; 95% CI, 0.97-12.61; P = .045) were associated with 4-week disease control, and male patients were more likely to relapse (HR, 10.97; 95% CI, 1.42-84.92; P = .02).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this retrospective cohort study, dupilumab treatment was associated with improved clinical symptoms in patients with BP. The safety profile was favorable, although concurrent infection and eosinophilia might pose potential concerns. This study suggests that patients with anti-BP180 antibody levels of at least 50 RU/mL and female sex may respond better.

Interventions for bullous pemphigoid

BACKGROUND

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune blistering disease. Oral steroids are the standard treatment. We have updated this review, which was first published in 2002, because several new treatments have since been tried.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of treatments for bullous pemphigoid.

SEARCH METHODS

We updated searches of the following databases to November 2021: Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase. We searched five trial databases to January 2022, and checked the reference lists of included studies for further references to relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs of treatments for immunofluorescence-confirmed bullous pemphigoid.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two review authors, working independently, evaluated the studies against the review's inclusion criteria and extracted data from included studies. Using GRADE methodology, we assessed the certainty of the evidence for each outcome in each comparison. Our primary outcomes were healing of skin lesions and mortality.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 14 RCTs (1442 participants). The main treatment modalities assessed were oral steroids, topical steroids, and the oral anti-inflammatory antibiotic doxycycline. Most studies reported mortality but adverse events and quality of life were not well reported. We decided to look at the primary outcomes 'disease control' and 'mortality'. Almost all studies investigated different comparisons; two studies were placebo-controlled. The results are therefore based on a single study for each comparison except azathioprine. Most studies involved only small numbers of participants. We assessed the risk of bias for all key outcomes as having 'some concerns' or high risk, due to missing data, inappropriate analysis, or insufficient information. Clobetasol propionate cream versus oral prednisone Compared to oral prednisone, clobetasol propionate cream applied over the whole body probably increases skin healing at day 21 (risk ratio (RR 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03 to 1.13; 1 study, 341 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Skin healing at 21 days was seen in 99.8% of participants assigned to clobetasol and 92.4% of participants assigned to prednisone. Clobetasol propionate cream applied over the whole body compared to oral prednisone may reduce mortality at one year (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.01; 1 study, 341 participants; low-certainty evidence). Death occurred in 26.5% (45/170) of participants assigned to clobetasol and 36.3% (62/171) of participants assigned to oral prednisone. This study did not measure quality of life. Clobetasol propionate cream may reduce risk of severe complications by day 21 compared with oral prednisone (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.86; 1 study, 341 participants; low-certainty evidence). Mild clobetasol propionate cream regimen (10 to 30 g/day) versus standard clobetasol propionate cream regimen (40 g/day) A mild regimen of topical clobetasol propionate applied over the whole body compared to the standard regimen probably does not change skin healing at day 21 (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.03; 1 study, 312 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Both groups showed complete healing of lesions at day 21 in 98% participants. A mild regimen of topical clobetasol propionate applied over the whole body compared to the standard regimen may not change mortality at one year (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.32; 1 study, 312 participants; low-certainty evidence), which occurred in 118/312 (37.9%) participants. This study did not measure quality of life. A mild regimen of topical clobetasol propionate applied over the whole body compared to the standard regimen may not change adverse events at one year (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.14; 1 study, 309 participants; low-certainty evidence). Doxycycline versus prednisolone Compared to prednisolone (0.5 mg/kg/day), doxycycline (200 mg/day) induces less skin healing at six weeks (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.92; 1 study, 213 participants; high-certainty evidence). Complete skin healing was reported in 73.8% of participants assigned to doxycycline and 91.1% assigned to prednisolone. Doxycycline compared to prednisolone probably decreases mortality at one year (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.89; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) = 14; 1 study, 234 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Mortality occurred in 2.4% (3/132) of participants with doxycycline and 9.7% (11/121) with prednisolone. Compared to prednisolone, doxycycline improved quality of life at one year (mean difference 1.8 points lower, which is more favourable on the Dermatology Life Quality Index, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.58 lower; 1 study, 234 participants; high-certainty evidence). Doxycycline compared to prednisolone probably reduces severe or life-threatening treatment-related adverse events at one year (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.99; 1 study, 234 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Prednisone plus azathioprine versus prednisone It is unclear whether azathioprine plus prednisone compared to prednisone alone affects skin healing or mortality because there was only very low-certainty evidence from two trials (98 participants). These studies did not measure quality of life. Adverse events were reported in a total of 20/48 (42%) participants assigned to azathioprine plus prednisone and 15/44 (34%) participants assigned to prednisone. Nicotinamide plus tetracycline versus prednisone It is unclear whether nicotinamide plus tetracycline compared to prednisone affects skin healing or mortality because there was only very low-certainty evidence from one trial (18 participants). This study did not measure quality of life. Fewer adverse events were reported in the nicotinamide group. Methylprednisolone plus azathioprine versus methylprednisolone plus dapsone It is unclear whether azathioprine plus methylprednisolone compared to dapsone plus methylprednisolone affects skin healing or mortality because there was only very low-certainty evidence from one trial (54 participants). This study did not measure quality of life. A total of 18 adverse events were reported in the azathioprine group and 13 in the dapsone group.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Clobetasol propionate cream applied over the whole body is probably similarly effective as, and may cause less mortality than, oral prednisone for treating bullous pemphigoid. Lower-dose clobetasol propionate cream applied over the whole body is probably similarly effective as standard-dose clobetasol propionate cream and has similar mortality. Doxycycline is less effective but causes less mortality than prednisolone for treating bullous pemphigoid. Other treatments need further investigation.

Concomitant use of dupilumab with glucocorticoid in bullous pemphigoid reduces disease severity: A preliminary study

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively analyze the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in the treatment of bullous pemphigoid.

METHODS

From October 2020 to October 2022, the medical records of patients with bullous pemphigoid who were treated with dupilumab in our department were collected retrospectively to analyze the therapeutic effect and changes in laboratory indexes.

RESULTS

The records of a total of 11 patients with bullous pemphigoid who were treated with dupilumab was reviewed. Within 2 weeks of the treatment, 10 (90.9%) of the 11 patients had complete or substantial control of the disease. The BPDAI scores of the patients decreased from baseline 113 (62, 181) to 37 (6, 130) at 2 weeks (p = .001) and 4 (0, 37) at 12 weeks after treatment (p < .001). In the 11 patients treated with dupilumab, the relief time of pruritus was 0-3 days (0.5, 7) days, and the pruritus was significantly alleviated after 2 weeks (t = 15.925, p < .001). The DLQI score decreased from (25.5 ± 2.5) before treatment, to (11.8 ± 4.4) at 2 weeks (t = 10.764, p < .001) and (2.1 ± 1.9) at 12 weeks (t = 30.038, p < .001). The patients had high eosinophil counts, high serum IgE levels, low serum total protein levels, and abnormal blood coagulation function. The aforementioned indicators gradually returned to normal after treatment. No adverse reactions occurred during the treatment.

CONCLUSION

Dupilumab can effectively control the condition of bullous pemphigoid, efficiently relieve pruritus symptoms, and is relatively safe.

Dupilumab in Inflammatory Skin Diseases: A Systematic Review

Dupilumab was first approved for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) and blocks the signaling of interleukin (IL)-4 and -13. Several other chronic skin conditions share mechanistic overlaps with AD in their pathophysiology, i.e., are linked to type 2 inflammation. Most recently, dupilumab was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for prurigo nodularis (PN). Given its relatively good safety profile, effective off-label use of dupilumab has been reported for a multitude of dermatologic diseases and several clinical trials for dermatologic skin conditions are currently ongoing. We conducted a systematic review of applications of dupilumab in dermatology other than AD and PN by searching the databases PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library as well as the clinical trial registry ClinicalTrials.gov. We found several reports for effective treatment of bullous autoimmune diseases, eczema, prurigo, alopecia areata, chronic spontaneous urticaria, Netherton syndrome and a variety of other chronic inflammatory skin diseases.

The efficacy and safety of dupilumab combined with methylprednisolone in the treatment of bullous pemphigoid in China

We access the safety and efficacy of methylprednisolone combined with dupilumab in treating the bullous pemphigoid. 27 patients were enrolled, of which 9 received dupilumab in addition to methylprednisolone (dupilumab group, D group), while the other 18 patients were administered methylprednisolone alone (traditional group, T group). The median time to stop the formation of the new blister was 5.5 days (3.5-11.75 days) and 10 days (9-15 days) in the D group and the T group, respectively (p = 0.032). Additionally, the median time of complete healing reached was 21 days (16.25-31 days) and 29 days (25-50 days) in the D group and the T group, separately (p = 0.042). The median amount of cumulative methylprednisolone at the time of disease control was 240 mg (140-580 mg) and 460 mg (400-840 mg) in the D group and the T group, respectively (p = 0.031). The total amount of the methylprednisolone used at the time of complete healing reached was 792 mg (597-1,488.5 mg) in the D group while that was 1,370 mg (1,000-2,570 mg) in the T group (p = 0.028). No adverse event associated with dupilumab was recorded. Methylprednisolone in combination with dupilumab appeared superior to methylprednisolone alone in control of disease progression and the methylprednisolone-sparing effect.

Research progress of omalizumab in the treatment of bullous pemphigoid

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune blistering disease associated with anti-BP180 and anti-BP230 antibodies. The pathogenic action mechanism of immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies in BP has been studied since the 1970s, and IgE antibodies have gradually been confirmed as being important in BP; therefore, anti-IgE therapy may be a new option for the treatment of BP. Omalizumab, as an IgE monoclonal antibody, has been increasingly used clinically to treat BP in recent years. Here, we collected 35 papers investigating omalizumab for BP treatment in a total of 83 patients, and the vast majority of patients showed varying degrees of improvement after treatment, except for a small number of patients with poor clinical outcomes. The patients were then divided into three groups according to dosing frequency and number of doses. Statistical analysis indicated that dosing frequency had little effect on clinical efficacy. While the groups with different numbers of doses were evaluated, the results concluded that clinical efficacy was affected by the number of doses, but there was no positive correlation between the number of doses and clinical efficacy.

Omalizumab treatment in combination with any other biologics: Is it really a safe duo?

BACKGROUND

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a mast cell-mediated disease, which is sometimes associated with various inflammatory disorders. Omalizumab is a commonly used biological agent, which is a recombinant, humanized, monoclonal antibody against human immunoglobulin E. However, there are only few reports about the combination of omalizumab for CSU with any other biologics for accompanying inflammatory diseases in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the patients whose treatment of omalizumab for CSU were combined with any other biologics for associated inflammatory disorders and to describe whether these combinations might have any safety concerns.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with CSU treated with omalizumab concurrently using another biological agent for their other dermatological conditions.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients, 19 women and 12 men, were evaluated. The mean age was 45.13 years. The median duration of omalizumab was 11 months. Biological agents which patients were treated other than omalizumab were as follows: adalimumab biosimilar (n = 3), ustekinumab (n = 4), secukinumab (n = 17) and ixekizumab (n = 7). The median duration of concurrent use of omalizumab and other biologics was 8 months. None of the drug combinations was stopped because of side effects.

CONCLUSION

This observational study demonstrated that omalizumab treatment for CSU in combination with any other biological agents for dermatological disorders appeared to be well tolerated without any major safety concerns.

The cytokine milieu of bullous pemphigoid: Current and novel therapeutic targets

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune bullous disease, characterized by severe pruritus and skin blistering. The loss of tolerance against Collagen XVII, also referred to as BP180, is the main pathogenic event of BP, leading to production of IgG autoantibodies which mainly target the juxtamembranous extracellular non-collagenous 16th A (NC16A) domain of BP180. A complex inflammatory network is activated upon autoantibody binding to the basement membrane zone; this inflammatory loop involves the complement cascade and the release of several inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and proteases from keratinocytes, lymphocytes, mast cells and granulocytes. Collectively, these events disrupt the integrity of the dermal-epidermal junction, leading to subepidermal blistering. Recent advances have led to identify novel therapeutic targets for BP, whose management is mainly based on the long-term use of topical and systemic corticosteroids. As an example, targeting type-2 T-helper cell-associated cytokines, such as Interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 has shown meaningful clinical efficacy in case series and studies; targeting IL-17 and IL-23 has also been tried, owing to an important role of these cytokines in the chronic maintenance phase of BP. In this review article, we discuss the complex cytokine milieu that characterized BP inflammation, highlighting molecules, which are currently investigated as present and future therapeutic targets for this life-threatening disease.

Bullous pemphigoid: The role of type 2 inflammation in its pathogenesis and the prospect of targeted therapy

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune disease that mainly occurs in the elderly, severely affecting their health and life quality. Traditional therapy for BP is mainly based on the systemic use of corticosteroids, but long-term use of corticosteroids results in a series of side effects. Type 2 inflammation is an immune response largely mediated by group 2 innate lymphoid cells, type 2 T helper cells, eosinophils, and inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5 and IL-13. Among patients with BP, the levels of immunoglobulin E and eosinophils are significantly increased in the peripheral blood and skin lesions, suggesting that the pathogenesis is tightly related to type 2 inflammation. To date, various targeted drugs have been developed to treat type 2 inflammatory diseases. In this review, we summarize the general process of type 2 inflammation, its role in the pathogenesis of BP and potential therapeutic targets and medications related to type 2 inflammation. The content of this review may contribute to the development of more effective drugs with fewer side effects for the treatment of BP.

Biological treatment for bullous pemphigoid

Background

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune subepidermal bullous disease. Topical or systemic corticosteroids are often used as the first-line treatment. However, long-term corticosteroid use may lead to significant side effects. Therefore, various adjuvant immunosuppressant therapies are used as steroid-sparing agents, with accumulating reports of biological treatments for severely recalcitrant BP.

Objective

To describe the clinical and immunological features of a series of patients with recalcitrant BP treated with immunobiological therapies. To assess the efficacy and safety of their therapies.

Methods

Patients receiving biological treatment for BP from two centers were assessed. Here, we described the clinical, immunopathological, and immunofluorescence findings of adult patients with BP and analyzed the clinical response and adverse events associated with various biological therapies.

Results

We identified nine eligible patients treated with rituximab (seven), omalizumab (three), or dupilumab (one). The mean age at diagnosis was 60.4 years, the average BP duration before biologic initiation was 1.9 years, and the average previous treatment failure was 2.11 therapies. The mean follow-up period from the first biological treatment to the last visit was 29.3 months. Satisfactory response, defined as clinical improvement, was achieved in 78% (7) of the patients, and total BP clearance was achieved in 55% (5) of the patients at the last follow-up visit. Additional rituximab courses improved the disease outcomes. No adverse events were reported.

Conclusions

Efficient and safe novel therapies can be considered in recalcitrant steroid-dependent BP non-responsive to conventional immunosuppressant therapies.

Insights Into the Pathogenesis of Bullous Pemphigoid: The Role of Complement-Independent Mechanisms

Bullous pemphigoid is an autoimmune blistering disease caused by autoantibodies targeting BP180 and BP230. While deposits of IgG and/or complement along the epidermal basement membrane are typically seen suggesting complement -mediated pathogenesis, several recent lines of evidence point towards complement-independent pathways contributing to tissue damage and subepidermal blister formation. Notable pathways include macropinocytosis of IgG-BP180 complexes resulting in depletion of cellular BP180, direct induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines from keratinocytes, as well as IgE autoantibody- and eosinophil-mediated effects. We review these mechanisms which open new perspectives on novel targeted treatment modalities.

Updated S2 K guidelines for the management of bullous pemphigoid initiated by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV)

BACKGROUND

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease of the skin and mucous membranes. This disease typically affects the elderly and presents with itch and localized or, most frequently, generalized bullous lesions. A subset of patients only develops excoriations, prurigo-like lesions, and eczematous and/or urticarial erythematous lesions. The disease, which is significantly associated with neurological disorders, has high morbidity and severely impacts the quality of life.

OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY

The Autoimmune blistering diseases Task Force of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology sought to update the guidelines for the management of BP based on new clinical information, and new evidence on diagnostic tools and interventions. The recommendations are either evidence-based or rely on expert opinion. The degree of consent among all task force members was included.

RESULTS

Treatment depends on the severity of BP and patients' comorbidities. High-potency topical corticosteroids are recommended as the mainstay of treatment whenever possible. Oral prednisone at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg/day is a recommended alternative. In case of contraindications or resistance to corticosteroids, immunosuppressive therapies, such as methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil or mycophenolate acid, may be recommended. The use of doxycycline and dapsone is controversial. They may be recommended, in particular, in patients with contraindications to oral corticosteroids. B-cell-depleting therapy and intravenous immunoglobulins may be considered in treatment-resistant cases. Omalizumab and dupilumab have recently shown promising results. The final version of the guideline was consented to by several patient organizations.

CONCLUSIONS

The guidelines for the management of BP were updated. They summarize evidence- and expert-based recommendations useful in clinical practice.

Rituximab, Omalizumab, and Dupilumab Treatment Outcomes in Bullous Pemphigoid: A Systematic Review

Background

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune subepidermal bullous disease of the skin. First-line treatment of systemic corticosteroids may cause serious adverse events. Rituximab, omalizumab, and dupilumab should be explored as alternative treatment options to improve outcomes.

Objective

To systematically review the rituximab, omalizumab, and dupilumab treatment outcomes in bullous pemphigoid.

Methods

A PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library search were conducted on March 10, 2022. A total of 75 studies were included using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.

Results

Use of rituximab (n=122), omalizumab (n=53) and dupilumab (n=36) were reported in 211 patients with BP. Rituximab led to complete remission in 70.5% (n=86/122) and partial remission in 23.8% (n=29/122) of patients within 5.7 months, with a recurrence rate of 20.5% (n=25/122). 9.0% (n=11/122) of patients died and infection (6.6%, n=8/122) was the most common adverse event. Omalizumab led to complete remission in 67.9% (n=36/53) and partial remission in 20.8% (n=11/53) of patients within 6.6 months, with a recurrence rate of 5.7% (n=3/53). 1.9% (n=1/53) of patients died and thrombocytopenia (1.9%, n=1/53) was observed as the most common adverse event. Dupilumab led to complete remission in 66.7% (n=24/36) and partial remission in 19.4% (n=7/36) of patients within 4.5 months of treatment without any reported adverse events, with a recurrence rate of 5.6% (n=2/36).

Conclusions

Rituximab, omalizumab, and dupilumab have similar clinical benefits for BP patients. However, rituximab resulted in higher recurrence rates, adverse events, and mortality rates.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022316454.

Use of Dupilumab in Bullous Pemphigoid: Where Are We Now?

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most frequent autoimmune subepidermal bullous disease. At present, the main treatment options are represented by corticosteroids and immunosuppressant drugs. Steroids often need to be administered in high doses, with subsequent adverse events and safety issues, as BP mainly affects elderly people. As dupilumab, a recombinant fully human IgG4 monoclonal antibody with binding specificity to human interleukin-4 receptor IL-4Rα has become paramount in the treatment of atopic dermatitis, its use in autoimmune bullous diseases has been theorized and it has been used to treat patients with BP. Dupilumab seems to be an effective and safe option to treat recalcitrant BP. Here, we report the results of a literature review on the use of dupilumab in BP, including a total of 30 treated patients in 9 papers.

A Review of the Immunologic Pathways Involved in Bullous Pemphigoid and Novel Therapeutic Targets

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a rare, chronic antibody-mediated autoimmune blistering disease primarily affecting the elderly, with an age of onset over 60. Current treatment options are limited and involve the use of corticosteroids and immunosuppressants, but their long-term use is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In Japan, human intravenous immunoglobin is approved for the treatment of corticosteroid-refractory BP. However, no treatment option is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the management of BP. Therefore, developing effective therapies free of debilitating side effects is imperative. In this review, we summarize the main immunologic pathways involved in the pathogenesis of BP, with an emphasis on the role of eosinophils, immunoglobulins, cytokines such as the interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-5, and complements. We further discuss the latest advances with novel therapeutic targets tested for the management of BP. Ongoing efforts are needed to run well-designed controlled trials and test the efficacy and safety of investigational drugs while providing much-needed access to these medications for refractory patients who will not otherwise be able to afford them as off-label prescriptions.

Rapid Disease Control in First-Line Therapy-Resistant Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid and Bullous Pemphigoid with Omalizumab as Add-On Therapy: A Case Series Of 13 Patients

The role of IgE autoantibodies has been demonstrated in the pathogenesis of bullous pemphigoid for many years. Recently, omalizumab (OMZ), a humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody that depletes total serum IgE, has been used off-label in a few case series of bullous pemphigoids demonstrating a rapid efficacy and allowing significant improvements or complete remission as add-on therapy in first-line treatment-resistant patients. Herein, we report the largest retrospective study to evaluate OMZ effectiveness in patients with subepidermal autoimmune blistering diseases. Our series included 13 patients from a single center with bullous pemphigoid or mucous membrane pemphigoid, of whom 7 had mucous membrane involvement. OMZ was added to the unchanged immunosuppressive therapies. Detailed clinical and immunological data during the first year were collected, notably for specific anti-BP180-NC16A IgE and IgG, and the median total follow-up was 30 months (range: 3-81). Our series demonstrated that OMZ induced a significant improvement in pruritus, urticarial score, and daily blister count on day 15, allowing disease control to be achieved in a 1-month median time and complete remission (CR) in a 3-month median time in 85% of these patients previously in therapeutic impasse. At the end of the follow-up, 31% of patients achieved CR on minimal therapy after OMZ weaning without relapses, and 54% achieved CR on OMZ continuation with a minimal dose of concomitant treatment. Two patients experienced therapeutic failure (15%). At baseline, clinical variables reflecting activity were significantly positively correlated with eosinophil blood count, total IgE serum level, specific anti-BP180 IgE and IgG. While baseline anti-BP180 IgG and specific anti-BP180 IgE were significantly positively correlated, only the two patients who experienced a therapeutic failure with OMZ did not fit with this correlation, demonstrating elevated levels of anti-BP180 IgG with no measurable BP180-specific IgE. Follow-up of immunological variables demonstrated a rapid decrease of eosinophilia towards normalization, whereas a slower decline towards negativation was observed over 1 year for anti-BP180 IgG and anti BP180 IgE in patients who responded to OMZ. This case series demonstrated that OMZ is a rapidly effective biologic therapy for refractory bullous pemphigoid and mucous membrane pemphigoid, permitting rapid disease control and reduction of concomitant therapeutics.

Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Moderate-to-Severe Bullous Pemphigoid

Background

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune blistering disorder that predominantly affects the elderly. As the main treatment for BP, systemic corticosteroids are often limited by their side effects. Safer treatment modalities are therefore needed. Dupilumab is a biologic agent used to treat BP in recent years.

Methods

Medical records of patients with moderate-to-severe BP were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-four patients were included (follow-up period: 32 weeks), eight of whom received dupilumab in combination with methylprednisolone and azathioprine (dupilumab group) while the other 16 patients received methylprednisolone and azathioprine (conventional group). Response to dupilumab was evaluated by comparison of several parameters (time to stop new blister formation, time to reduce the systemic glucocorticoids to minimal dose, and total amount of methylprednisolone).

Results

The median age of patients in the dupilumab and conventional groups were 64.50 years (range: 22–90 years) and 64.50 years (range: 17–86 years), respectively. The median duration of disease before admission in the dupilumab group was 2 months (range: 1–240 months) and 2.5 months (range: 1–60 months) in the conventional group. The median time to stop new blister formation was 8 days (range: 1–13 days) and 12 days (range: 5–21 days) in patients of the dupilumab and conventional groups, respectively (p = 0.028 by Kaplan-Meier analysis). In addition, the median time to reduce the systemic glucocorticoids to minimal dose (methylprednisolone 0.08 mg/kg/day) was 121.5 and 148.5 days for the dupilumab and conventional therapy groups, respectively (p = 0.0053 by Kaplan-Meier analysis). The median total amount of methylprednisolone (at the time of reaching the minimal dose) used in the dupilumab group was 1,898 mg (range: 1,624–2,932 mg) while the cumulative dose of conventional group was 2,344 mg (range: 1,708–4,744 mg) (p = 0.036 by Mann-Whitney U test). The median total amount of azathioprine (at the time of reaching the minimal dose) used in dupilumab group was 8,300 mg (range: 7,100–10,400 mg) while the total dose of conventional group was 10,300 mg (range: 8,900–14,400 mg) (p = 0.0048 by Mann-Whitney U test). No adverse event related to dupilumab was recorded.

Conclusions

Dupilumab in addition to methylprednisolone and azathioprine seems superior to methylprednisolone/azathioprine alone in controlling disease progression and accelerating the tapering of glucocorticoids.

Bullous Pemphigoid and Other Pemphigoid Dermatoses

The pemphigoid family of dermatoses is characterized by autoimmune subepidermal blistering. The classic paradigm for pemphigoid, and the most common member, is bullous pemphigoid. Its variable clinical presentation, with or without frank bullae, is linked by significant pruritus afflicting the elderly. Mucous membrane pemphigoid is an umbrella term for a group of subepidermal blistering dermatoses that favor the mucosal membranes and can scar. Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita is a chronic blistering disorder characterized by skin fragility, sensitivity to trauma, and its treatment-refractory nature. Clinicians that encounter these pemphigoid disorders may benefit from an overview of their clinical presentation, diagnostic work-up, and therapeutic management, with an emphasis on the most frequently encountered pemphigoid disease, bullous pemphigoid.

A blistering new era for bullous pemphigoid: A scoping review of current therapies, ongoing clinical trials, and future directions

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a severe autoimmune blistering skin disorder that primarily causes disease in the older population and is the most prevalent subepidermal variant of the pemphigoid diseases. It manifests as exquisitely pruritic vesiculobullous eruptions and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Studies are reporting an increase in prevalence, and, among the elderly, BP is no longer considered to be as rare as previously thought. The pathogenesis involves autoantibodies directed against proteinaceous components of hemidesmosomes, with consequent autoimmune destruction of the dermal-epidermal junction. In recent times, more complex elements of the underlying inflammatory orchestra have been elucidated and are being used to develop targeted immunotherapies. The primary treatment modalities of BP include the use of topical and systemic corticosteroids, certain non-immunosuppressive agents (tetracyclines, nicotinamide, and sulfone), and immunosuppressants (methotrexate, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, and Mycophenolate). However, in the long term, most of these agents are associated with substantial toxicities while recurrence rates remain high. Such egregious prospects led to significant efforts being directed towards developing newer targeted therapies which work by attenuating specific newly discovered pillars of the inflammatory pathway, and these efforts have garnered hope in providing safer alternatives. Our review focuses on presenting the various therapeutic options that are currently in trial since December 2019, as well as on summarizing presently established treatment guidelines to provide readers with the latest exciting updates.

•

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a severe autoimmune blistering skin disorder that primarily causes disease in the older population and is the most prevalent subepidermal variant of the pemphigoid diseases.

•

In recent times, more complex elements of the underlying inflammatory orchestra have been elucidated and are being used to develop targeted immunotherapies.

•

The present review focuses on presenting the various therapeutic options that are currently in trial since December 2019, as well as on summarizing presently established treatment guidelines to provide readers with the latest exciting updates.

Emerging Biomarkers and Therapeutic Strategies for Refractory Bullous Pemphigoid

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune subepidermal blistering disorder in the elderly. Systemic and topical use of glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants has been shown to be effective in most patients. However, refractory BP patients are challenged to clinicians with severe clinical symptoms, resistance to treatment, and high relapse rate. How to predict and assess the refractory and severity of bullous pemphigoid is the key issue in clinical practice, and the urgent need for precision medicine in refractory patients is driving the search for biomarkers and biologics. Recently, some biomarkers, such as the level of specific autoantibodies and released cytokines, have been proposed as the potential parameters to reflect the disease severity and predict the treatment response and relapse of refractory BP. Moreover, new biologics targeting pathogenic antibodies, complement, Th2 axis, eosinophils, and Th17 axis have shown potent efficacy on refractory BP. Here, we review the literature and give an overview of emerging biomarkers and therapeutic strategies for refractory bullous pemphigoid to improve the prognosis of the patient.

The pruritogenic role of the type 2 immune response in diseases associated with chronic itch

While there is a vast array of aetiologies that may lead to chronic pruritus, recent data suggests that many of these conditions share similar interactions between keratinocytes, nerves, and the immune system. Specifically, the type 2 immune response, including Th2 T Cells and their related cytokines, has been noted to play a major role in the development of pruritus in a variety of itchy conditions. To date, atopic dermatitis is the most striking example of this pathogenesis. However, the body of literature supporting its role in many other itchy conditions, including other inflammatory, bullous, as well as systemic diseases, continues to grow. In addition, new treatments targeting this type 2 immune system continue to be developed and investigated. In the current review, we present the current body of literature supporting the role of the type 2 immune response in itchy conditions beyond atopic dermatitis as well as potential therapeutic options that target this pathway for chronic itch.